Article addresses the preservation of humanity in the era of rapidly advancing generative artificial intelligence (AI). It proceeds from the hypothesis that the fundamental danger of AI lies not in its potential sentience, but in the human tendency to reduce one's own existence to algorithmic processing. Employing an interdisciplinary approach that integrates insights from neuroscience (Penfield, Egnor), philosophy of mind (Feser, Searle), and theology, the research demonstrates the ontological irreducibility of the human being to a material machine. The analysis of neuroscientific evidence refutes biological reductionism and affirms the immaterial nature of the intellect and will. Furthermore, the article exposes the epistemological gap between AI syntax and human semantics, defining AI as a “logical other” or a simulacrum lacking internal insight. Finally, the discussion shifts to eschatological and ethical dimensions, where the author, through a critique of transhumanism and the concept of “technological idolatry,” argues that humanity can only be preserved by embracing existential vulnerability, finitude, and the capacity for silence—qualities that digital immortality cannot offer.

Rights