Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 133-144. doi: 10.2478/raon-2024-0006 133 research article The influence of cytotoxic drugs on the immunophenotype of blast cells in paediatric B precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia Tomaz Prelog 1,2 , Simon Bucek 3 , Andreja Brozic 3 , Jakob Peterlin 4 , Marko Kavcic 1 , Masa Omerzel 5 , Bostjan Markelc 5 , Tanja Jesenko 2,5 , Veronika Kloboves Prevodnik 2,3,6 1 Department of Haemato-Oncology, University Children’s Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 2 Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 3 Department of Cytopathology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 4 Institute for Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 5 Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 6 Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 133-144. Received 14 May 2023 Accepted 6 December 2023 Correspondence to: Prof. Veronika Kloboves Prevodnik, M.D., Ph.D., Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia. E-mail: vkloboves@onko-i.si Disclosure: No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Background. Flow cytometry plays is important in the diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and when antigen-specific immunotherapy is indicated. We have investigated the effects of prednisolone, vincristine, daunoru- bicin, asparaginase and methotrexate on the antigen expression on blast cells that could influence the planning of antigen-specific therapy as well as risk-based treatment assignment. Patients and methods. Patients aged ≤ 17 years with de novo B-cell ALL (B-ALL) were enrolled in the study. Blast cells were isolated and exposed in vitro to 5 individual cytotoxic drugs in logarithmically increasing concentrations. Then, the expression of CD10, CD19, CD20, CD27, CD34, CD45, CD58, CD66c and CD137 antigens was determined by quantitative flow cytometry. Results. Cytotoxic drugs caused dose-dependent or dose-independent modulation of antigen expression. Daunorubicin caused a dose-dependent down-modulation of CD10, CD19, CD34, CD45 and CD58 and an up-mod- ulation of CD137. Vincristine caused a dose-dependent down-modulation of CD19 and CD58 and an up-modulation of CD45. Daunorubicin also caused dose-independent down-modulation of CD27 and prednisolone down-modula- tion of CD10, CD19, CD27, CD34 and CD58. Down-modulation of CD20 was detected only in relation to the specific dose of daunorubicin. Conclusions. The results of the study have shown that cytotoxic drugs can alter the expression of antigens that are important for immunotherapy. Importantly, daunorubicin, prednisolone and vincristine caused down-modulation of CD19 and CD58, suggesting that these drugs are better avoided during bridging therapy prior to bispecific antibodies or CAR-T cell therapy. In addition, immunophenotypic changes on blast cells induced by different drugs could also influence risk-based treatment assignment. Key words: immunophenotypic changes; chemotherapy; immunotherapy; paediatric B-ALL Introduction Flow cytometry is one of the methods used in the diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). It provides important information about the ex- pression of antigens on blast cells and is important for determining minimal residual disease (MRD), Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 133-144. Prelog T et al. / The influence of drugs on the immunophenotype of paediatric B-ALL 134 which allows assessment of response to therapy and further planning of treatment. 1,2 According to the International Berlin-Frankfurt- Münster Study Group clinical trial (ALL IC BFM 2009) the intensity of therapy for childhood ALL is based on risk stratification. 1 The patients are di- vided into three risk groups, standard risk (SR), intermediate risk (IR) and high risk (HR). HR pa- tient must fulfil at least one of the following crite- ria: presence of specific genetic alterations (t(9;22) or t(4;11)), hypodiploid blast cells, > 1000 blast cells in 1 mL peripheral blood on day 8 of therapy, MRD on day 15 > 10% and patients not in morphological remission on day 33. 1 SR patients are 1-6 years old, have a white blood cell count of < 20000/mL at the time of diagnosis, < 1000 blasts per mL of periph- eral blood on day 8 of therapy, MRD on day 15 < 0.1% and are in morphological remission on day 33 of therapy. 1 All others are IR patients. 1 SR and IR patients are treated with 4 consecu- tive chemotherapy blocks: induction, early inten- sification, consolidation and reinduction, followed by maintenance therapy. HR patients receive more intensive consolidation with 6 blocks of chemo- therapy or 3 blocks followed by bone marrow transplantation. 1 In induction prednisolone, vin- cristine, daunorubicin, asparaginase and intrathe- cal application of methotrexate are used. 1 In later phases, other cytostatic drugs are administered. 1 In relapsed or refractory disease, when immu- notherapy with bispecific antibodies or chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells is commonly in- dicated, the choice of therapeutic approach is of- ten based on the immunophenotype of the blast cells. For instance the expression of antigens such as CD19, CD20 and CD58 is essential for planning treatment with blinatumomab, rituximab and CAR-T therapy. 2-6 Some studies have already investigated the im- pact of the cytotoxic drugs on antigen expression of blast cells and showed that chemotherapy can cause a change in their expression, which may be related to cell death, the efficacy of therapy and the overall prognosis of the disease. 7-10 Moreover, chemotherapy may also influence expression of antigens which are essential for effective treat- ment with bispecific antibodies and CAR-T cells. 10 Certain antigens expressed on blast cells may also be associated with the prognosis of the ALL patients. Expression of CD27, CD34, CD45 and CD66c antigens has already been reported to be associated with prognosis of ALL. 11-18 Additionally, expression of CD66c strongly correlates with BCR/ ABL rearrangement. 17 To our knowledge there is no data about the influence of chemotherapeutic drugs on expression of these prognostic markers in the literature. In Table 1 we present the antigens which are important for planning the treatment of ALL patients or are associated with the prognosis of the ALL. The aim of the study was to assess the influ- ence of drugs included in ALL induction therapy on antigen expression of blast cells which are com- mon targets for immunotherapy (CD19, CD20) or TABLE 1. Antigens expressed on acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) blasts which are essential for planning the treatment or may influence the prognosis of the disease Antigen Expression of the antigen in normal and pathological conditions Clinical significance CD10 Normal lymphoid progenitors, neutrophils and blast cells of B-ALL 19 Associated with favourable presenting features in paediatric B-ALL and possible target for emerging CAR-T 19-21 CD19 Normal and malignant B lymphocytes 22 Target of blinatumomab and CAR-T 22-24 CD20 Normal and malignant B lymphocytes 21 Target of rituximab, up-modulated in B-ALL patients with poor prognosis 7,21 CD27 T cells, natural killer cells and thymocytes, also memory B cells, and in some subsets of B-ALL 11 Positive in B-ALL with BCR/ABL or CRLF2 rearrangement, high positivity was associated with poor prognosis 11-13 CD34 Pluripotent stem cells 14 Lack of expression associated with worse event free and overall survival of ALL 15 CD45 Cells of hematopoietic origin 25 High expression associated with high risk disease and worse event free survival, and worse rate of complete remission after the induction therapy 16,26 CD58 Hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic cells 27 Lack of expression reduces the efficacy of blinatumomab and anti-CD19 CAR-T 4,5 CD66c Granulocytes and their precursors, most common myeloid antigen on malignant B lymphoblasts 17 Associated with specific genetic alterations such as BCR/ABL, hypodiploidy, hypodiploidy and CRLF2-positivity in B-ALL 17,18 CD137 T lymphocytes and natural killer cells but also on activated B cells of naive origin 28 Enhances B cell survival 28 B-ALL = B-cell ALL; CAR-T = chimeric antigen receptor T; CRLF2 = cytokine receptor-like factor 2 Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 133-144. Prelog T et al. / The influence of drugs on the immunophenotype of paediatric B-ALL 135 possess the potential to impact its effectiveness (CD58). Additionally, we have studied the anti- gens that could play a role in categorizing patients into distinct treatment risk groups, enhancing the precision of patient stratification (CD10, CD27, CD34, CD45, CD66c and CD137). Importantly, we analysed the influence of drugs and their dosage separately. Patients and methods Patients Between March 2018 and November 2021, we performed bone marrow aspiration or peripheral blood withdrawal in case of extreme leukocytosis in all children with suspected acute leukaemia. Informed consent was obtained from the patient and parents or consent from a proxy before enrol- ment in the study. The National Medical Ethics Committee approved the study (protocol number: KME 25/05/15). First, we performed all routine diagnostic pro- cedures, and if B-cell ALL was confirmed, the re- maining bone marrow sample was further culti- vated in vitro. In total, we recruited 35 patients and collected 34 bone marrow samples and one periph- eral blood sample. Six samples were not included in the final analysis because the number of cells after isolation was too low to perform the treat- ment with cytostatic drugs (4 cases) or because viable cells in the control group were lost during the treatment with cytostatic drugs (2 cases). In to- tal, we treated and analysed blast cells from the remaining 29 samples. Twenty-seven of the included patients older than one year were treated according to the ALL IC-BMF 09 protocol 1 , more than half of them ac- cording to the intermediate risk arm. Two patients younger than 1 year were treated according to the Interfant 06 protocol. 29 None of the included pa- tients had blasts in the cerebrospinal fluid at the time of diagnosis. One patient who failed induc- tion therapy received anti-CD19 CAR-T cell thera- py, followed by bone marrow transplantation. Two other high-risk patients were treated with alloge- neic stem cell transplantation. The clinical charac- teristics and outcome of all included patients are summarised in Table 2. The response to therapy in patients treated ac- cording to the ALL IC-BFM 09 protocol is summa- rised in Table 3. Among two patients, who were treated accord- ing to Interfant 06 protocol one of them had ex- treme hyperleukocytosis, finished the therapy and is in a remission. The other patient died of progres- sive disease. Isolation and cultivation of blast cells After confirming B-ALL diagnosis, blast cells from bone marrow or peripheral blood were isolated by density gradient centrifugation using Ficoll- Paque (GE HealthCare Technologies Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) media and SepMate TM -15 centrifuga- tion tubes (STEMCEL Technologies, Vancouver, Canada). After centrifugation and harvesting from the top of the Ficoll layer, cells were washed 2 times in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10 mM HEPES buffer (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Medium was supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco), Gluta-MAX (100 x, Gibco), and penicillin-streptomycin (100 x, Sigma-Aldrich, Merck, Darm-stadt, Germany). Cells were plated at high density in T-75 or T-182 flasks (VWR, Radnor, PA, USA) in cell culture me- dia and incubated in a humidified incubator with 5% CO 2 at 37°C until the treatment with cytotoxic drugs (maximum 3 days). TABLE 2. Clinical characteristics of all included patients No. of all included patients with B-ALL N = 29 Male/female N 17/12 Mean age at diagnosis Years 4.76 (newborn 17) Flow cytometric findings at diagnosis Pro-B Pre-B Common type N (%) 3 (10) 6 (21) 20 (69) Cytogenetic and molecular finding at diagnosis normal karyotype hyperdiploid t(12;21) N (%) 6 (21) 10 (34) (28) complex karyotype (3) MLL changes of unknown risk potential 1 (3) 3 (10) Outcome N (%) Alive 93) Died 2 (7) Cause of death N pancreatitis* 1 progressive disease** 1 * = tr eat ed ac c or ding t o ALL IC-BF M 2009 pr o t oc ol ; ** = tr eat ed ac c or ding t o In t erf an t 06 protocol; MLL = mixed-lineage leukaemia rearrangement; N = number of patients; Pro-B, Pre-B and common B = stage of differentiation Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 133-144. Prelog T et al. / The influence of drugs on the immunophenotype of paediatric B-ALL 136 Treatment of blast cells with cytotoxic drugs Cells were collected and a suspension of 1×10 6 cells in 1.8 mL of fresh culture medium was plat- ed in each well of the 24-well plate (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA). Then, 0.2 mL of different con- centrations of cytotoxic drugs (prednisolone, dau- norubicin, methotrexate, asparaginase or vincris- tine) diluted in saline were added to the cells. Each drug was used in three logarithmically increasing concentrations, which were determined before the beginning of the study. Few logarithmically in- creasing concentrations were tested and final con- centrations used in the study were selected based on blast viability. More specifically, the lowest con- centration was chosen such that it was not signifi- cantly cytotoxic. In the experiments, prednisolone (Predisolut, MIBE GmbH Arzneimittel, Brehna, Germany) was used at final concentrations of 1, 0.1 and 0.01 mM, daunorubicin (Daunoblastin, Pfizer, New York, NY, USA) at concentrations of 1, 0.1 and 0.01 µg/mL, methotrexate (Methotrexate, Medac Pharma, Wedel, Germany) at concentra- tions of 1, 0.1 and 0.01 mg/mL and asparaginase (Oncaspar Pegaspargase, Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC, Boston, MA; USA) at concentrations of 1, 0.1 and 0.01 units/mL. Vincristine (Vicristine, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Tel Aviv, Israel) was used at con- centrations of 0.1, 0.01 and 0.001 µg/mL, with the exception of two experiments, performed at the time when optimal concentration was to be deter- mined. In those two experiments vincristine was used at concentration of 10, 1 and 0,1 µg/mL. Each experiment also included a population of blast cells not exposed to any cytotoxic drug (addition of 0.2 mL saline), which was used as a control. After the addition of the cytotoxic drugs, the cells were incubated in a 5% CO 2 humidified incuba- tor at 37 °C for three days and then prepared for immunophenotypic analysis by quantitative flow cytometry. Quantitative flow cytometric measurements To quantify the antigen expression a calibra- tion chart was used. It was based on Quantum™ Simply Cellular® beads (Bangs Laboratories Inc., Fishers, IN, USA) and was generated at the time of each experiment. The sample and bead meas- urements were performed on the same day under the same conditions. The measured fluorescence of each antibody on the surface of the blast cells was converted to an antibody count using the cali- bration chart and expressed as antibody binding capacity. Measurements, analysis and interpreta- tion of the results were performed according to the Instructions for Use of Quantum™ Simply Cellular® Beads (Bangs Laboratories Inc.). Cell count and sample preparation for flow- cytometric analysis was carried out as previously described by our group. 30,31 The sample aliquot containing half a million cells was first put in a test tube. Antibodies against CD10, CD19, CD20, CD27, CD34, CD45 CD58, CD66c and CD137 antigens were added at saturation concentrations (Table 4). 1µL of propidium iodide (concentration 200µg/mL) was also added to determine the viability of cells. After 20 min incubation, erythrocyte lysis was car- ried out using a commercial lysing solution (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The samples were than acquired using a FACSCanto 10-colour flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) with three lasers (405, 488 and 633 nm) and FACSDiva 8.0.2 software (BD Bioscience). The flow cytometer was routinely set up and calibrated by measuring FACSDiva TM CS &T IVD beads (BD Biosciences) and Sphero TM Rainbow Calibration particles (Spherotech Inc., Lake Forest, IL, USA). TABLE 3. Response to the therapy in patients treated according ALL IC BFM 09 protocol Patients treated according to ALL IC-BFM 2009 protocol No. of patients 27 Treatment arm SR IR HR N (%) 6 (22) 18 (66) 3 (11) Response to prednisolone on day 8 good response* poor response** N (%) 27 (100) 0 (0) Minimal residual disease on day 15 < 0.1% 0.1−10% > 10% N (%) 10 (37) 15 (56) 2 (7) Minimal residual disease on day 33 neg < 0.1% 0.1−10% > 10% N (%) 16 (59) 6 (22) 3 (11) 2 (7) Outcome alive died N (%) 26 (96) 1 (4) * = prednisolone good response is defined as blast count of less than 1000 per mL of peripheral blood on the day 8 of induction therapy; ** = prednisone poor response is defined as blast count of more than 1000 per mL of peripheral blood on the day 8 of induction therapy; HR = high risk; IR = intermediate risk; N = number of patients; SR = standard risk Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 133-144. Prelog T et al. / The influence of drugs on the immunophenotype of paediatric B-ALL 137 For the final analyses, the software BD FlowJo 10.8.1 (BD Biosciences) was used. First a gate for mononuclear cells on the forward versus side scat- ter plot was selected. In the next step, single cells were selected by gating on the height against the area for forward scatter. Gating on propidium io- dide was used to select only viable cells. In the fi- nal step, blast cells were gated according to their immunophenotype, in most cases by selecting CD10-positive cells on CD10 versus CD45 plots. An example of a gating procedure is shown in Figure 1. Finally, we determined the fluorescence of each antigen analysed from the histogram. Statistical analysis The analysis was performed using R (R version 4.1.0) 32 and Julia (version 19.2). 33 Linear mixed mod- els were fitted using R package nlme (version 3.1- 157) 34 and using MixedModels.jl (version 4.13.1) 35 in Julia. The optimal transformation of the depend- ent variables and the assessment of the goodness of fit of linear mixed models were performed with the help of the goodness of fit procedure described in publication by Peterlin et al. 36 The significance of the parameters was assessed with Wald’s test in the nlme package, and the confidence intervals were computed with the help of the parametric boot- strap with 10 6 repetitions in MixedModels.jl. All p values and confidence intervals are two-sided and were adjusted with the Bonferonni-Holm pro- cedure, with a significance level of 0.05. The mar- ginal effects were calculated with the help of the lmeresampler package (version 0.2.4) with residual bootstrap with 10 4 repetitions. The 95% confidence intervals for these marginal effects are unadjusted and provided only in graphic form, serving as a tool to aid in understanding the results rather than as definitive statistical result. We have analyzed every single antigen expres- sion (CDn) with a separate linear mixed model. Before analyzing the data with linear mixed mod- els, we transformed the dependent variables CDn and the number of cytotoxic drugs given. We have done this to improve the resulting models’ good- ness of fit. We have used 9 models described by the formula: TABLE 4. The description of the antibodies used for flow cytometry Antibody Antibody clone Antibody vendor Antibody volume (μL) CD10 Anti-CD10 Horizon™ BV605 HI10a BD Biosciences 5 CD19 CD19-BD Horizon™ V450 Mouse Anti-Human CD19 SJ25C1 BD Biosciences 5 CD20 CD20-BD™ CD20 APC L27 BD Biosciences 7 CD27 CD27-BD Horizon™ APC-R700 Mouse Anti-Human CD27 M-T271 BD Biosciences 5 CD34 CD34-BD™ CD34 PE -Cy™7 8G12 BD Biosciences 5 CD45 CD45-BD™ CD45 APC-Cy™7 2D1 BD Biosciences 3 CD58 CD58-BD Pharmingen™ FITC Mouse Anti-Human CD58 1C3 BD Biosciences 3 CD66c CD66c-BD OptiBuild™ BV510 Mouse Anti-Human CD66c B6.2/ CD66 BD Biosciences 5 CD137 CD137-BD Pharmingen™ PE Mouse Anti-Human CD137 4B4-1 BD Biosciences 7 FIGURE 1. Example of a gating procedure. Mononuclear cells were selected on the forward versus side scatter plot (A) and single cells by gating on the area against the width for forward scatter (B). Propidium iodide (PI) was used to select viable cells (C). The final selection of blasts was based on their immunophenotype, in this case by selecting CD10- positive cells on the CD10 versus CD45 plots (D). Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 133-144. Prelog T et al. / The influence of drugs on the immunophenotype of paediatric B-ALL 138 In the above formula, the term indicates the antigen expression, indicates control, indicates the cytotoxic drugs that were pre- sent in this study, determines the patient and indicates an indicator function ( if is not true and if is true). The fixed effects parameters of the above model are then - base value for units in the data that were not exposed to any cy- totoxic drugs, and k_d are the - base value and the slope for the units that were exposed to the cy- totoxic drug . We assessed the significance of the parameters and k_d. Results For every drug d and marker CDn antigen, we have primarily been focused on the statistical significance of the coefficients d, which signifies the effect that we observed that was independent of the amount (for the amounts that we have examined), and the coefficient k_d, which describes how the value of the log(CD + 0.1) changes with respect to the log_{10} (amount) of a drug d, which signifies the effect that we observed that was dependent on the amount. For a given CDn and drug d that appear in the same row in Table 5, one of four things can happen: A) Both coefficients (d, k_d) were statistically signif- icantly different from 0. In this case, which we highlight with red in Table 5, we can interpret this as merely giving a drug to a cell culture, significantly changing observed antigen expres- sion on blast cells, and that it also matters in which amount the drug is given to the culture. One such example was CD19 and vincristine. In the case of CD19 and vincristine, we can there- fore expect that the value of the will decrease by for a given patient and amount in the range exam- ined by our study. Note that the amounts of vin- cristine examined by our analysis ranged from to . Hence, depending on the amount, we expect the decrease of to be between to and it de- creases linearly with respect to . Other combinations of drug and observed CDn antigen with the same pattern of influence are daunorubicin and CD10, CD137, CD19, CD34, CD45 and CD58, as well as vincristine and CD45 and CD58. B) If just the coefficient d was significant, which we highlight with blue in Table 5, we can inter- pret that giving a drug d to cell culture signifi- cantly changes antigen expression. However, the amount of drug d that is used, if the amount is within the range of the drug d given in this study, does not significantly alter the expression of observed CDn antigen. One such example is CD19 and prednisolone. In the case of prednisolone and CD19, we can say that we expect that the patient’s value of decreases by , regardless of the amount of prednisolone, as long as this amount is in the range examined by our study, which was and . Other combinations of drug and observed an- tigen with the same pattern of influence were daunorubicin and CD27, as well as predniso- lone and CD10, CD27, CD34 and CD58. C) If only the coefficient k_d was significant, which we highlight with green in Table 5, we cannot say that just giving some amount (in the range examined by our study) of drug d to blast cells is either up or downmodulating the CDn anti- gen expression without specifying the amount of this drug. Example of this is CD20 and dau- norubicin. In the case of daunorubicin and CD20, we can say that the value of patients’ changes by when the amount is between and , which is the range examined by our study. This means that the value of can either change by or increase by - 0.22 (0.01) = 0.44, depending on the value of , with respect to which, it chang- es linearly. D) If neither the coefficient d nor k_d is statistically significantly different from 0, we cannot say that the drug d affects the CDn marker—an ex- ample is vincristine and CD10 (Table 5). Marginal effects for these nine models are shown in Figure 2A and Figure 2B. From these figures, we can easily see which cytotoxic drugs change a specific CDn antigen expression. However, since this study is primarily con- cerned with the effects of cytotoxic drugs condi- tionally on the individual and these figures are primarily informative, the confidence intervals in these two figures are not adjusted. Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 133-144. Prelog T et al. / The influence of drugs on the immunophenotype of paediatric B-ALL 139 Discussion Our in vitro study has shown that prednisolone, methotrexate, vincristine, daunorubicin and as- paraginase used in the induction treatment of ALL cause up- or down-modulation of some antigens on ALL blast cells. The effect of the drugs was dose- dependent or dose-independent. We showed that the drugs used in induction therapy influence an- tigen expression which has been not yet described in the literature such as CD27, CD45, CD137 and CD66c. Moreover, the results of our study showed that cytotoxic drugs used in the induction treat- ment of ALL can influence CD19, CD20 and CD58 antigen expression on blast cells that can play an essential role in the treatment of resistant or re- lapsed disease or antigens that could potentially influence the future stratification of patients into risk groups important for planning the treatment. CD20 expression was stable with all cytotoxic drugs except daunorubicin. When the effect of daunorubicin was analysed with our statistical model, there were no changes in CD20 expression. However, when only the role of dose was exam- ined, a modulation of CD20 expression was ob- served. Accordingly, we cannot say that just giving some amount of daunorubicin to blast cells causes an up- or down-modulation of CD20 expression without specifying the amount of the drug. These results are difficult to interpret, but as our study was not designed to explain the isolated effect of the dose when there is no effect of the drug in the model. To clarify the discrepancy between the ef- fect of the drug and its dose, further analyses with a larger number of patients and a larger number of different concentrations of daunorubicin are needed. Dworzak et al. have published that CD20 is up-modulated in the early phases of therapy, es- pecially in patients with poor prognosis and high MRD at the end of induction treatment. 7 Similar changes also occurred after blasts were exposed to different cytotoxic drugs in vitro. 7 Prednisolone and a single intrathecal dose of methotrexate are usually the only drugs used in the first week of ALL therapy and in some protocols, the response to prednisolone is one of the criteria for stratify- ing patients into risk groups. It is defined by the number of blast cells in the peripheral blood on day 8 of treatment. If the patient has more than 1000 blasts per millilitre of blood, they are defined as a prednisolone poor responder and thus a high- risk patient. 1 If the number of blasts is very high at the start of treatment, a patient may not reach FIGURE 2A. The plots of the marginal effects for the fixed effects coefficients of the models for CD137, CD34 and CD19. The lines correspond to the estimates of the marginal effects and the coloured areas to the 95% confidence intervals. FIGURE 2B. The plots of the marginal effects for the fixed effects coefficients of the models for CD20, CD45, CD27, CD66c, CD10, and CD58. The lines correspond to the estimates of the marginal effects and the coloured areas to the 95% confidence intervals. Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 133-144. Prelog T et al. / The influence of drugs on the immunophenotype of paediatric B-ALL 140 TABLE 5. The coefficients obtained by using separate mixed model which showed the effect of single drug in CDn antigen expression. The coefficient d showed the presence of CDn antigen and coefficient of k_d the influence of drug dose on antigen expression. The way how the given drug influences the antigen expression is shown in different colours: RED (coefficients d and k_d are statistically significantly different from 0), BLUE (the coefficient d is significantly different from 0), GREEN (coefficient k_d is significantly different from 0) and WHITE (neither the coefficient d nor k_d is statistically significantly different from 0). 95% confidence intervals, and corresponding p values are also shown. All confidence intervals and p values were adjusted with Holm’s method Drug CD Coefficient d (presence) p value for d Coefficient k_d (log(amount)) p value for k_d Asparaginase CD10 -0.12, [-0.33, 0.1] 1 -0.01, [-0.11, 0.1] 1 CD137 -0.18, [-0.46, 0.1] 1 0, [-0.11, 0.12] 1 CD19 -0.09, [-0.42, 0.24] 1 -0.01, [-0.14, 0.13] 1 CD20 -0.15, [-0.39, 0.09] 1 0, [-0.09, 0.1] 1 CD27 -0.03, [-0.28, 0.22] 1 -0.01, [-0.12, 0.11] 1 CD34 -0.15, [-0.4, 0.09] 1 -0.09, [-0.23, 0.04] 1 CD45 -0.04, [-0.27, 0.2] 1 -0.02, [-0.16, 0.11] 1 CD58 -0.05, [-0.23, 0.13] 1 0.01, [-0.08, 0.1] 1 CD66c -0.05, [-0.36, 0.27] 1 0.02, [-0.15, 0.19] 1 Daunorubicin CD10 -1.1, [-1.38, -0.83] < 0.001 -0.47, [-0.63, -0.31] < 0.001 CD137 1.05, [0.72, 1.37] < 0.001 0.4, [0.21, 0.59] < 0.001 CD19 -1.05, [-1.48, -0.62] < 0.001 -0.35, [-0.6, -0.1] < 0.001 CD20 -0.24, [-0.53, 0.05] 0.35 -0.22, [-0.39, -0.05] 0.002 CD27 -0.6, [-0.92, -0.27] < 0.001 -0.09, [-0.27, 0.09] 1 CD34 -1.48, [-1.8, -1.16] < 0.001 -0.74, [-0.93, -0.55] < 0.001 CD45 -0.58, [-0.9, -0.27] < 0.001 -0.28, [-0.47, -0.1] < 0.001 CD58 -0.73, [-0.97, -0.5] < 0.001 -0.32, [-0.46, -0.19] < 0.001 CD66c 0.28, [-0.13, 0.69] 1 0.13, [-0.1, 0.37] 1 Methotrexate CD10 -0.1, [-0.52, 0.33] 1 -0.04, [-0.32, 0.24] 1 CD137 0.11, [-0.33, 0.56] 1 0.02, [-0.24, 0.29] 1 CD19 -0.33, [-1, 0.35] 1 0.02, [-0.38, 0.42] 1 CD20 -0.21, [-0.68, 0.27] 1 0.04, [-0.26, 0.34] 1 CD27 -0.26, [-0.79, 0.27] 1 -0.03, [-0.34, 0.29] 1 CD34 0.08, [-0.4, 0.56] 1 0.04, [-0.28, 0.35] 1 CD45 -0.04, [-0.5, 0.41] 1 0.03, [-0.29, 0.35] 1 CD58 0.01, [-0.25, 0.27] 1 0.02, [-0.21, 0.26] 1 CD66c -0.05, [-0.64, 0.54] 1 -0.02, [-0.4, 0.37] 1 Prednisolone CD10 -0.42, [-0.64, -0.21] < 0.001 -0.01, [-0.12, 0.1] 1 CD137 -0.06, [-0.32, 0.19] 1 0.05, [-0.1, 0.19] 1 CD19 -0.61, [-0.94, -0.27] < 0.001 -0.03, [-0.2, 0.15] 1 CD20 0.14, [-0.09, 0.37] 1 0.02, [-0.1, 0.14] 1 CD27 -0.5, [-0.76, -0.23] < 0.001 -0.15, [-0.3, 0] 0.055 CD34 -0.35, [-0.6, -0.11] < 0.001 0.03, [-0.1, 0.16] 1 CD45 -0.12, [-0.36, 0.12] 1 -0.07, [-0.2, 0.07] 1 CD58 -0.19, [-0.38, -0.01] 0.034 -0.05, [-0.15, 0.05] 1 CD66c 0, [-0.19, 0.19] 1 -0.02, [-0.2, 0.15] 1 Vincristine CD10 -0.14, [-0.37, 0.1] 1 -0.05, [-0.14, 0.05] 1 CD137 0.01, [-0.22, 0.25] 1 0.07, [-0.04, 0.18] 1 CD19 -0.56, [-0.94, 0] < 0.001 -0.17, [-0.32, -0.03] 0.004 CD20 0.06, [-0.19, 0.31] 1 0.01, [-0.08, 0.09] 1 CD27 -0.06, [-0.34, 0.23] 1 0, [-0.09, 0.09] 1 CD34 -0.18, [-0.45, 0.1] 1 -0.04, [-0.14, 0.06] 1 CD45 0.36, [0.07, 0.64] 0.002 0.16, [0.05, 0.26] < 0.001 CD58 -0.27, [-0.48, -0.06] 0.001 -0.11, [-0.19, -0.03] < 0.001 CD66c -0.04, [-0.39, 0.3] 1 -0.02, [-0.15, 0.11] 1 Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 133-144. Prelog T et al. / The influence of drugs on the immunophenotype of paediatric B-ALL 141 the threshold despite a relatively good response to therapy, resulting in a classification in a high-risk group with a more aggressive and toxic treatment. None of our patients was classified as HR due to a poor response to prednisolone and CD20 expres- sion remained stable in the in vitro settings after the addition of prednisolone. Those results are consistent with the publication by Dworzak et al. showing that CD20 up-modulation in early treat- ment phases is associated with a worse prognosis. 7 However, since all patients in our experiment re- sponded well to prednisolone, we cannot confirm that CD20 modulation could be a stratification cri- terion replacing the number of blasts in peripheral blood on day 8 of therapy. To confirm this hypoth- esis, we would need to include more patients. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody, has been shown to improve survival in adult patients with CD20-positive B-cell ALL. 2 Based on the data pub- lished by van der Sluijs-Gelling et al. describing CD20 up-modulation after in vitro exposure of blast cells to prednisolone, dexamethasone, vin- cristine or asparaginase 10 , one might assume that rituximab has the best efficacy when one of these drugs is used prior to initiation of the therapy. In contrast to the published results, our study sug- gests that the use of rituximab is equally justified in all phases of therapy that include steroids, vin- cristine, methotrexate or asparaginase. CD19 expression in ALL is of clinical importance due to the efficacy of anti-CD19 therapies such as blinatumomab or CAR-T cells. 23,24 According to our results, daunorubicin, vincristine and pred- nisolone can induce down-modulation of CD19, which is partly consistent with data published by Van der Sluijs-Gelling et al. showing that CD19 is down-modulated after exposure to prednisolone, dexamethasone, vincristine or asparaginase. 10 These changes may have implications for the treat- ment of children with resistant or relapsed ALL who receive blinatumomab or anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy. In the 4−6 weeks between leukapheresis and CAR-T administration, bridging therapy re- duces the disease burden and keeps the patient’s clinical condition stable. After reviewing the pa- tient’s medical history and response to previous treatment, a multidisciplinary team usually selects cytotoxic drugs for bridging therapy. There are no specific recommendations for the choice of thera- peutic approach at this crucial stage. 3 Our results show that daunorubicin, vincristine and predni- solone can induce down-modulation of CD19 on blast cells suggesting these drugs and especially prednisolone, whose effect is dose-independent, should be better avoided in bridging therapy so as not to impair the effectiveness of anti-CD19 immu- notherapy. The presence of CD58 has been shown to be very important for the efficacy of bispecific anti- CD19 antibodies and anti-CD19 CAR-T cell ther- apy, as the lack of CD58 decreases T-lymphocyte activation and reduces the success of treatment. 4,5 In our experiment, CD58 was down-modulated when daunorubicin, prednisolone or vincristine was added. The effect of prednisolone was dose- independent, while the dose of daunorubicin and vincristine was also important. Gaipa et al. de- scribed the down-modulation of CD58 expression on day 33 of treatment in patients with ALL, and these changes were considered to be prognosti- cally significant. 8 Our results and the data from Gaipa’s study suggest that it may be useful to avoid daunorubicin, prednisolone or vincristine immediately before specific anti-CD19 therapy as well as for bridging therapy to prevent CD58 down-modulation and a possible decrease in treat- ment efficacy. Specific changes in CD10 and CD34 expression during ALL therapy is controversial, but it has been shown that CD10 positivity in B-ALL had been associated with disease prognosis. 15 CD10, also known as the common acute lymphoblastic leukaemia antigen, can be detected in the blast cells of most patients with B-ALL. 15 The prognostic significance of CD10 expression is associated with several favourable features such as a hyperdiploid karyotype, age less than nine years and a standard risk group. 15,19 Our study showed down-modula- tion of CD10 after treatment with daunorubicin or prednisolone, and the effect of prednisolone was dose-independent. This is consistent with pub- lished data showing a transient down-modulation of CD10 in the early phase of ALL treatment, with the changes being more pronounced in patients with a good response to prednisolone and a better prognosis of the disease. 8–10,37 CD34, the pluripotent stem cell antigen, plays an important role in stem cell attachment to the extra- cellular matrix and its presence on blast cells has been shown to be a good prognostic factor in adult patients with ALL, who have undergone stem cell transplantation in the first remission. 14 Its positiv- ity in ALL is also associated with a lower leuko- cyte count, a favourable karyotype and a better prognosis compared to CD34-negative ALL. 15 In our experiment, prednisolone and daunorubicin triggered a significant down-modulation of CD34, which again is partly consistent with published da- Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 133-144. Prelog T et al. / The influence of drugs on the immunophenotype of paediatric B-ALL 142 ta, where down-modulation of CD34 on blast cells after in vitro exposure to prednisolone and in vivo during the early phase of ALL therapy has been shown, especially in patients with a better progno- sis. 9,10,37 According to our data, methotrexate, vin- cristine and asparaginase, drugs also used in in- duction therapy, had no effect on CD34 expression. In our study CD10 and CD34 were shown to be down-modulated in blast cells after exposure to prednisolone and daunorubicin, which is part- ly consistent with data published by Gaipa et al. showing correlation between a better response to prednisolone and down-modulation of CD10 and CD34. 9 Since our study included only a small num- ber of patients and all responded well to predniso- lone, our data do not allow us to draw any conclu- sions about the importance of changes in antigen expression as a prognostic marker. Therefore, a larger number of patients, including prednisolone- poor responders would need to be enrolled in the study to confirm changes in CD10 and CD34 ex- pression as stratification parameters. In addition to CD10, CD19, CD20, CD34 and CD58, we analysed other antigens whose modu- lation significance in patients with B-ALL has, to our knowledge, not yet been described. The exper- iment allowed us to assess shifts in the expression of CD27, CD45, CD66c and CD137. Lower expression of CD45, an essential modula- tor of signal transduction pathways in blast cells, is associated with a higher rate of complete re- missions at day 29 of B-ALL treatment and high expression of CD45 was associated with unfa- vourable prognostic factors and worse event free survival of the disease. 10,16,26,38 In our experiment, CD45 was down-modulated after exposure to in- creasing concentrations of daunorubicin, and a dose-dependent up-modulation was observed after the addition of vincristine to the blast cells. Since it was shown that CD45 expression is high- er in immature pro-B-ALL than in pre-B-ALL we could speculate that vincristine causes modulation of antigen expression towards the immunophe- notype of pro-B-ALL. 16 Additionally, it has been show that increased CD45 expression in blast cells is associated with decreased cell proliferation and treatment resistance but to determine the impor- tance of changes in CD45 expression after expo- sure to daunorubicin and vincristine, further test would be needed. 16 CD137 is known to be present in T lympho- cytes and natural killer cells. 39 The antigen is also expressed in human B lymphocytes, particularly on activated B cells. 28 Despite the low expression of CD137 (data not shown), we were able to detect an up-modulation of the antigen, but only after exposure to daunorubicin. Zhang et al. has pub- lished that CD137 mediates cell proliferation and that B cell survival was improved by CD137 liga- tion. 28 Potentially in case of CD137 up-modulation on blast cells after exposure to daunorubicin, the survival of blast cells could be improved, influenc- ing the response to therapy. To evaluate the clini- cal impact of CD137 modulation, further analysis would be needed. CD27, a member of the tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily, is mainly present on T cells, natural killer cells and thymocytes. 40 It can also be detected on the surface of memory B cells as well as on high risk B-ALL with Philadelphia chro- mosome, cytokine receptor-like factor 2 (CRLF2) rearrangement or in B-other ALL with unknown or not classifying genetic aberrations, where it is additional poor prognostic factor. 11,13,41 In oncology, CD27 is important in induction of cytotoxic T lym- phocyte activation and CD27 agonists were proven to induce antitumor immunity. 13,42 Additionally Vitale et al. have shown that anti-CD27 antibod- ies have also a direct affect against CD27 positive blast cells. 43 Our study showed a dose-independ- ent down-modulation of CD27 on blast cells after exposure to daunorubicin or prednisolone. Our re- sults suggest that down-modulation of CD27 may attenuate the efficacy of a direct anti-CD27 anti- body against blast cells. Since we have shown that CD27 is down-modulated in blast cells, it would be very interesting to investigate the effect of dauno- rubicin and prednisolone on CD27 expression and activation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, for which further studies are needed. Patients diagnosed with Philadelphia chromo- some positive ALL are usually treated with a com- bination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and stand- ard chemotherapy. 44 CD66c is the myeloid antigen commonly expressed on malignant B lympho- blasts, has no clear prognostic significance but is associated with important genetic alterations such as the presence of a Philadelphia chromosome, hy- perdiploidy, hypodiploidy and CRLF2-positivity in B-ALL. 17,18 After analysing the effects of chemother- apy, we found that CD66c expression was mostly low but quantifiable and that none of the drugs had an impact on its expression. Importantly, none of the included patients had Philadelphia chromo- some positive ALL. Since the expression of CD66c was stable after the exposure to all tested drugs, CD66c could be a good candidate to MRD detec- tion in patients with CD66c positive B-ALL. Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 133-144. Prelog T et al. / The influence of drugs on the immunophenotype of paediatric B-ALL 143 Conclusions The present in vitro study and statistical model al- lowed us to determine the effects of each drug and its dose separately. We were able to shown that cy- totoxic drugs can induce changes in the expression of antigens that play an important role in planning immunotherapy or that are prognostically impor- tant. Importantly we have shown that CD19 and CD58 were down-modulated after exposure to daunorubicin, prednisolone or vincristine, sug- gesting that these drugs are better avoided dur- ing bridging therapy prior to CAR-T cell therapy or bispecific antibodies. Furthermore, we have shown that in some cases the dose of the drug, as opposed to the addition of the drug itself, had no effect on antigen expression. An example of this is prednisolone, where all antigen modulations were dose-independent, meaning that even low doses of the drug can induce immunophenotypic changes. Moreover, according to our results, cytotoxic drugs trigger other changes in the expression of antigens that could be prognostically important. However, further analyses with a larger number of patients are required to determine the clinical significance of these changes. Acknowledgement The research was supported by the Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency (ARIS) [grant numbers P3-0003, P3-0289 and P3-0154) and by the University Medical Centre Ljubljana grant 20200252. References 1. Campbell M, Castillo L, Riccheri C, Janic D, Jazbec J, Kaiserova E, et al. ALL IC- BFM 2009. A randomized trial of the I-BFM-SG for the management of child- hood non-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Final version of therapy protocol from August 14 2009. [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 15]. Available at https:// www.bialaczka.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/ALLIC_BFM_2009.pdf 2. Maury S, Chevret S, Thomas X, Heim D, Leguay T, Huguet F, et al. Rituximab in B-lineage adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 1044-53. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1605085 3. Hayden PJ, Roddie C, Bader P, Basak, GW, Bonig H, Bonini C, et al. Management of adults and children receiving CAR T-cell therapy: 2021 best practice recommendations of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT (JACIE) and the European Haematology Association (EHA). Ann Oncol 2022; 33: 259-75. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.12.003 4. Li Y , Moriyama T, Yoshimura S, Zhao X, Li Z, Yang X, et al. PAX5 epigenetically orchestrates CD58 transcription and modulates blinatumomab response in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci Adv 2022; 8: eadd6403. doi: 10.1126/ sciadv.add6403 5. Yan X, Chen D, Ma X, Wang Y, Guo Y, Wei J, et al. CD58 loss in tumor cells confers functional impairment of CAR T cells. Blood Adv 2022; 6: 5844-56. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007891 6. Hunger SP, Raetz EA. How I treat relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the pediatric population. Blood 2020; 136: 1803-12. doi: 10.1182/ blood.2019004043 7. Dworzak MN, Schumich A, Printz D, Pötschger U, Husak Z, Attarbaschi A, et al. CD20 up-regulation in pediatric B-cell precursor acute lympho- blastic leukemia during induction treatment: setting the stage for anti- CD20 directed immunotherapy. Blood 2008; 112: 3982-88. doi: 10.1182/ blood-2008-06-164129 8. Gaipa G, Basso G, Maglia O, Leoni V, Faini A, Cazzaniga G, et al. Drug-induced immunophenotypic modulation in childhood ALL: implications for mini- mal residual disease detection. Leukemia 2005; 19: 49-56. doi: 10.1038/ sj.leu.2403559 9. Gaipa G, Basso G, Aliprandi S, Migliavacca M, Vallinoto C, Maglia O, et al. Prednisone induces immunophenotypic modulation of CD10 and CD34 in nonapoptotic B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 2008; 74: 150-5. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20408 10. van der Sluijs-Gelling AJ, van der Velden VHJ, Roeffen ETJM, Veerman AJP, van Wering ER. Immunophenotypic modulation in childhood precursor-B- ALL can be mimicked in vitro and is related to the induction of cell death. Leukemia 2005; 19: 1845-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403911 11. Chen D, Gerasimčik N, Camponeschi A, Tan Y , Wu Q, Brynjolfsson S, et al. CD27 expression and its association with clinical outcome in children and adults with pro-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood Cancer J 2017; 7: e575. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2017.55 12. Riether C, Schürch CM, Bührer ED, Hinterbrandner M, Huguenin AL, Hoepner S, et al. CD70/CD27 signaling promotes blast stemness and is a viable therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukemia. J Exp Med 2017; 214: 359-80. doi: 10.1084/jem.20152008 13. Starzer AM, Berghoff AS. New emerging targets in cancer immunotherapy: CD27 (TNFRSF7). ESMO Open 2020; 4(Suppl 3): e000629. doi: 10.1136/ esmoopen-2019-000629 14. Aljurf M, Chaudhri NA, Almhareb F, Walter CU, Nounou R, Khalil S, et al. CD34 expression in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) Is a favorable prognostic factor in patients treated with stem cell transplant in first remis- sion. Blood 2011; 118: 4091. doi: 10.1182/blood.v118.21.4091.4091 15. Dakka N, Bellaoui H, Bouzid N, Khattab M, Bakri Y, Benjouad A. CD10 and CD34 expression in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in morocco: clinical relevance and outcome. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2009; 26: 216-31. doi: 10.1080/07357900902897557 16. Cario G, Rhein P , Mitlöhner R, Zimmermann M, Bandapalli OR, Romey R, et al. High CD45 surface expression determines relapse risk in children with precursor B-cell and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated accord- ing to the ALL-BFM 2000 protocol. Haematologica 2014; 99: 103-10. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.090225 17. Guillaume N, Penther D, Vaida I, Gruson B, Harrivel V, Claisse JF, et al. CD66c expression in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: strength and weakness. Int J Lab Hematol 2011; 33: 92-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2010.01254.x 18. Kiyokawa N, Iijima K, Tomita O, Miharu M, Hasegawa D, Kobayashi K, et al. Significance of CD66c expression in childhood acute lymphoblastic leuke- mia. Leuk Res 2014; 38: 2-48. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2013.10.008 19. Consolini R, Legitimo A, Rondelli R, Guguelmi C, Barisone E, Lippi A, et al. Clinical relevance of CD10 expression in childhood ALL. The Italian Association for Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (AIEOP). Haematologica 1998; 83: 967-73. PMID: 9864914 20. Mitwasi N, Arndt C, Loureiro LR, Kegler A, Fasslrinner F, Berndt N, et al. Targeting CD10 on B-cell leukemia using the universal CAR T-cell platform (UniCAR). Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23: 4912. doi: 10.3390/ijms23094920 21. Gökbuget N, Hoelzer D. Treatment with monoclonal antibodies in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Current knowledge and future prospects. Ann Hematol 2004; 83: 201-5. doi: 10.1007/s00277-003-0752-8 22. Wang K, Wei G, Liu D. CD19: a biomarker for B cell development, lymphoma diagnosis and therapy. Exp Hematol Oncol 2012; 1: 1-7. doi: 10.1186/2162- 3619-1-36 Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(1): 133-144. Prelog T et al. / The influence of drugs on the immunophenotype of paediatric B-ALL 144 23. Brown PA, Ji L, Xu X, Devidas M, Hogan L, Borowitz JB, et al. A randomized phase 3 trial of blinatumomab vs. chemotherapy as post-reinduction therapy in high and intermediate risk (HR/IR) first relapse of B-acute lymph- oblastic leukemia (B-ALL) in children and adolescents/young adults (AYAs) demonstrates superior efficacy and tolerability of blinatumomab: a report from children’s oncology group study AALL1331. Blood 2019; 134(Suppl 2): LBA-1. doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-132435 24. Fabrizio VA, Phillips CL, Lane A, Baggott C, Prabhu S, Egeler E, et al. Tisagenlecleucel outcomes in relapsed/refractory extramedullary ALL: A Pediatric Real World CAR Consortium Report. Blood Adv 2022; 6: 600-10. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005564 25. Schnitzlein WM, Zuckermann FA. Determination of the specificity of CD45 and CD45R monoclonal antibodies through the use of transfected hamster cells producing individual porcine CD45 isoforms. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1998; 60: 389-401. doi: 10.1016/S0165-2427(97)00113-X 26. Balasubramanian P, Singh J, Verma D, Kumar R, Bakhshi S, Tanwar P, et al. Prognostic significance of CD45 antigen expression in pediatric acute lymph- oblastic leukemia. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2021; 89: 102562. doi: 10.1016/j. bcmd.2021.102562 27. Zhang Y , Liu Q, Yang S, Liao Q. CD58 Immunobiology at a glance. Front Immunol 2021; 12: 1-20. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.705260 28. Zhang X, Voskens CJ, Sallin M, Maniar A, Montes CL, Zhang Y, et al. CD137 promotes proliferation and survival of human B cells. J Immunol 2010; 184: 787-95. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901619 29. Pieters R, Schrappe M, Valsecchi MG, Biondi A, de Rossi G, Suppiah R, et al. International collaborative treatment protocol for the infants under one year with acute lymphoblastic or biphenotypic leukemia - INTERFANT 06. 2008; version 11(17 July 2007). Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Available at: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/central/doi/10.1002/ central/CN-01834165/full 30. Brozic A, Pohar Marinsek Z, Novakovic S, Kloboves Prevodnik V . Inconclusive flow cytometric surface light chain results; can cytoplasmic light chains, Bcl-2 expression and PCR clonality analysis improve accuracy of cytological diagnoses in B-cell lymphomas? Diagn Pathol 2015; 10: 1-10. doi: 10.1186/ s13000-015-0427-5 31. Brožič A. [Clonality and antigenic properties of reactive and neoplas- tic lymphocytic proliferations]. [Slovenian]. Doctoral Dissertation; 2016. [Internet]. Available at: https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva. php?lang=slv&id=84423 32. Team RC. A Language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computin; 2020. [Internet]. [cited 2023 Feb 15]. Available at: cwww.r-project.org/ 33. Bezanson J, Edelman A, Karpinski S, Shah VB. Julia: a fresh approach to numerical computing. SIAM Rev 2017; 59: 65-98. doi: 10.1137/141000671 34. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D. Team, R.C. Nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R Package Version Nov 27 2023. [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec]. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ nlme/nlme.pdf 35. Bates D, Alday P, Kleinschmidt D, Calderón JBS, Noack A, Kelman T, et al. JuliaStats/MixedModels.jl: v2.3.0 (v2.3.0). Zenodo; 2020 [Internet]. [cited 2023 Feb 16]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3727845 36. Peterlin J, Kejžar N, Blagus R. Correct specification of design matrices in linear mixed effects models: tests with graphical representation. TEST 2023; 32: 184-210. doi: 10.1007/s11749-022-00830-1 37. Dworzak MN, Gaipa G, Schumich A, Maglia O, Ratei R, Veltroni M, et al. Modulation of antigen expression in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia during induction therapy is partly transient: evidence for a drug- induced regulatory phenomenon. Results of the AIEOP-BFM-ALL-FLOW- MRD-study group. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 2010; 78: 147-53. doi: 10.1002/ cyto.b.20516 38. Espinoza-Gutarra MR, Agarwal P, Ferrer L, Czader M, Dave U. Relationship between CD45 expression and outcomes in B lymphoblastic leukemia/ lymphoma. Blood 2020; 136(Suppl 1): 24. doi: 10.1182/blood-2020-142085 39. Schwarz H, Valbracht J, Tuckwell J, Von Kempis J, Lotz M. ILA the human 4-1BB homologue, is inducible in lymphoid and other cell lineages. Blood 1995; 85: 1043-52. doi: 10.1182/blood.v85.4.1043.bloodjournal8541043 40. Borst J, Hendriks J, Xiao Y . CD27 and CD70 in T cell and B cell activation. Curr Opin Immunol 2005; 17: 275-81. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2005.04.004 41. Agematsu K, Hokibara S, Nagumo H, Komiyama A. CD27: a memo- ry B-cell marker. Immunol Today 2000; 21: 204-6. doi: 10.1016/S0167- 5699(00)01605-4 42. Taraban VY, Rowley TF, Kerr JP, Willoughby JE, Johnson PM, Al-Shamkhani A, et al. CD27 costimulation contributes substantially to the expansion of functional memory CD8+ T cells after peptide immunization. Eur J Immunol 2013; 43: 3314-23. doi: 10.1002/eji.201343579 43. Vitale LA, He LZ, Thomas LJ, Widger J, Weidlick J, Crocker A, et al. Development of a human monoclonal antibody for potential therapy of CD27-expressing lymphoma and leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18: 3812- 21. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3308 44. Biondi A, Schrappe M, De Lorenzo P, Castor A, Lucchini G, Gandemer V, Pieters R, et al. Imatinib after induction for treatment of children and adolescents with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (EsPhALL): a randomised, open-label, intergroup study. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: 936-45. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70377-7