Slovenian Society for Gynaecological Oncology, Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, National Programme and Registration ZORA - Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Association of Slovenian Gynaecologists and Obstetricians Prevention of cervical cancer in Balkan region and in Finland in the HPV era Brdo Congress Centre, Slovenia 13. november 2019 Book of proceedings of the 4th Regional symposium on prevention of cervical cancer Prevention of cervical cancer in Balkan region and in Finland in the HPV era Book of proceedings Brdo Congress Centre, Slovenia, 13. november 2019 Editors: associate prof. Špela Smrkolj, PhD, MD and Urška Ivanuš, PhD, MD Publishers: Združenje za ginekološko onkologijo, kolposkopijo in cervikalno patologijo SZD (Slovenian Society for Gy naecological Oncology, Colposcopy and Cervical Pa thology), and NP ZORA - Institute of Oncology Ljubljana (DP ZORA - Onkološki inštitut Ljubljana) Scientific committee: Špela Smrkolj, Urška Ivanuš, Dražan Butorac, Joško Zekan, Goran Dimitrov, Ermina Ilijazović, Ajoša Mandić, Pekka Nieminen, Adolf Lukanović Organizing committee: Špela Smrkolj, Urška Ivanuš, Mojca Florjančič, Martina Pečlin, Ivan Verdenik, Mojca Poženel, Blaž Podobnik, Tine Jerman Kataložni zapis o publikaciji (CIP) pripravili v Narodni in univerzitetni knjižnici v Ljubljani COBISS.SI-ID=303100160 ISBN 978-961-93998-5-9 (pdf) ___________________________ ___________________________ 2 Contents Contributing authors ........................................................................................................... 4 Introduction to brief reports from representatives of different countries Špela Smrkolj, Urška Ivanuš .................................................................................................. 5 Prevention of cervical cancer in Croatia Dražan Butorac .................................................................................................................... 7 Prevention of cervical cancer in Serbia Aljoša Mandić ....................................................................................................................... 9 Prevention of cervical cancer in Republic of N. Macedonia Goran Dimitrov .................................................................................................................. 13 Prevention of cervical cancer in Bosnia and Herzegovina Ermina Iljazović ................................................................................................................. 16 National Cervical Cancer Screening Programme in Montenegro Đurđica Ostojić ................................................................................................................... 19 Cervical cancer prevention In Finland Pekka Nieminen .................................................................................................................. 22 Prevention of cervical cancer in Slovenia Urška Ivanuš ....................................................................................................................... 23 What can we learn from each other in our region? Suggestions for future activities Joško Zekan......................................................................................................................... 31 Cervical cancer Vitaly Smelov ...................................................................................................................... 33 ___________________________ ___________________________ 3 Contributing authors Prim. doc. dr. Dražan Butorac, dr. med. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Centre „Sestre milosrdnice“, Zagreb, Croatia Prof. dr. Goran Dimitrov, dr. med. Medical faculty, University of Skopje; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Centre of Skopje, North Macedonia Prof. dr Ermina Iljazović, dr. med. Medical faculty, University of Tuzla; Department of Pathology, Clinical centre of Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina Dr. Urška Ivanuš, dr. med. National program ZORA, Institute for Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia Prof. dr. Aljoša Mandić, dr. med. Medical faculty, University of Novi Sad; Department of Onco-Gynecology, Institute for Oncology Vojvodina, Serbia Prof. dr. Pekka Nieminen, dr. med. Department of. Obstetrics and Gynecology Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, EFC president Dr. Đurđica Ostojić, dr. med. Acting director of the Centre for Control and Prevention of Noncommunicable Diseases, Institute for Public Health of Montenegro Dr. Vitaly Smelov, dr. med., IARC WHO – Lyon, France Prof. dr. Špela Smrkolj, dr. med. Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical centre Ljubljana, Slovenia Prim. prof. dr. Joško Zekan, dr. med. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb (KBCZ), Zagreb, Croatia ___________________________ ___________________________ 4 Prevention of cervical cancer in Balkan region and in Finland in the HPV era: An introduction to brief reports from representatives of different countries Špela Smrkolj, Urška Ivanuš Dear participants of the 4th Regional Symposium on Prevention of Cervical Cancer, We are glad that the tradition of regional meetings of experts working hard for cervical cancer prevention in our region continues and that the 4th meet- ing will take place in the beautiful Brdo Estate in Slovenia. Slovenian Socie- ty for Gynaecologic Oncology, Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and National Cervical Cancer Screening Programme ZORA work hand in hand to fight this deadly yet almost completely preventable disease in Slovenia. We believe that working together is the key to success and the only way to reach the World Health Organisation’s 2030 goals toward elimination of cervical cancer as the public health problem which are that 90% of girls fully are vaccinated against HPV by 15 years of age, 70% of women screened for cancer screening in a high quality programme at least at 35 and 45 years of age and that 90% of women with identified cervical disease receive treat- ment. In the mid November days in 2019 we wil exchange knowledge and experi- ence in the field of cervical cancer prevention in the region and we wil learn from each other. Successful cervical cancer prevention needs a good organi- sation and management, but also enthusiastic professionals with the good insight in the current evidence that are wil ing to push things forward in the evidence based way and adapted to local context, even when it seems that nothing can be done. Dear colleagues gynaecologists, pathologists and epidemiologists from Croa- tia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Monte Negro, North Macedonia and Slovenia we come from different countries and different specialisations. But we do share a common history and common goal of the elimination of cer- ___________________________ ___________________________ 5 vical cancer in our region. And we al believe it can be done easier, if we wil continue to work together! We wish that the symposium will meet you expectations and that we will al go home with new ideas and boosted motivation how to approach the situa- tion in this field in our own countries. Associate Prof. Špela Smrkolj, MD, PhD President of the Slovenian Society for Gynecologic Oncology, Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Urška Ivanuš, MD, PhD, Head of Cervical Cancer Screening Pro- gramme and Registry ZORA ___________________________ ___________________________ 6 Prevention of cervical cancer in Croatia Dražan Butorac What is the incidence of cervical cancer in the country? Crude incidence rate 2018. 12,3; 2018. 266 new cervical cancer cases How is cervical cancer screening program organized? Does it fulfil criteria for the organised population-based programme? An opportunistic screening program based on the Pap test has been used in Croatia since 1953. In this moment we are prepearing a new organized screening program based on the combination of pap smear and hpv tests depending on age groups. What are the age range of the target population and the frequency of screening? There are three groups: 20-29 years, 30-34 years, and 35-64 years • First - group Pap test, • second co test Pap HPV, • and third group HPV test What test is used in the primary screening? Do they use liquid- based technology? Pap test, HPV test, and co test. We will not use liquid-based tecnology in program How is the invitation system organised? What is the coverage of the target population with invitations? What is the coverage of the target population with screening tests? We will see ___________________________ ___________________________ 7 HPV test used in the country and how is it used? HPV for women in third age group 35-64 years , and cotest with Pap in second groups How is vaccination against HPV organised? What is vaccination coverage? Do you vaccinate girls and boys In 2019, the target group for vaccinations are girls and boys, eighth grade students. Due to more vaccines are recommended for high school girls and boys. Depending on the county, the response to the vaccination is 2-80%. On average 15% ___________________________ ___________________________ 8 Prevention of cervical cancer in Serbia Aljoša Mandić Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Serbia Cervical cancer is still one of the main problems in female population in Serbia. The incidence of cervical cancer in Serbia is among the highest one in the Europe. According to our National Register, cervical cancer is on forth places among female cancers in Central Serbia but also in Vojvodina, North part of Serbia, with incidence rate 20-23/100.000. Graph 1. and 2 Graph 1: Linear-trend of incidence and mortality rate in Vojvodina ___________________________ ___________________________ 9 Graph 2. Comparison of age-specific cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates in Serbia (estimates for 2018)- ref.4 About 1,327 new cervical cancer cases are diagnosed annually in Serbia and the 2nd most common female cancer in women aged 15 to 44 years in Ser- bia. About 551 cervical cancer deaths occur annual y in Serbia. Cervical cancer ranks as the 6th leading cause of female cancer deaths in Serbia and the 2nd leading cause of cancer deaths in women aged 15 to 44 years in Serbia. Despite the promotion of the cervical screening program, still we have op- portunistic one, and smal number of community-health center is covered with full capacities to organized such a program in their communities. The cervical cancer screening program is based on conventional PAP smear and the cornerstone for implementation of the program are the communities- health centers with their gynecologists and cytoscreeners. According to our national screening program the target population that have to be screened are about 2.100.000 women, age 25 to 64, every three years. Co-testing with HPV test is not calculated but, HPV testing can be per- formed in triage in ASCUS, PAP smears. So, HPV testing is recommended in our National guidelines for prevention, detection and treatment of cervi- cal cancer, mostly as triage test. The coverage of the target population is about 35-40%,. According to screening program, target population will be called by post with brochure about importance of screening, schedule time for visiting the gynecologist with telephon number of community health center. Plan is to cover 700.000 in one year with our goal to cover about 75% of the target population ___________________________ ___________________________ 10 (550.000). In Serbia 15 Central laboratory are organized for screening program and according to standards we need 4-5 cytoscreeners with full time job and one supervisor in each center. The primary prevention program for eradication of cervical cancer by im- plementation of HPV vaccination is still at the beginning and still we do not have plan for implementation. The HPV vaccination is in National vaccina- tion calendar as recommended one, but we still do not have plan how to implement organizing vaccination program. The Quadrivalent and Bivalent HPV vaccines are registred in Serbia but the Health Insurance Fund does not cover them; they are quite expensive for ordinary citizens, and not easily obtained in clinics and pharmacies. In study Mitrovic J et al. quantitative research was conducted through the internet in December of 2016, using the survey method. Participants in the study were parents whose children were candidates for the vaccination. The research has shown that nearly one third of respondents do not know what HPV is, and about the same number of respondents know that HPV causes cancer. With adequate awareness of safety, 97% of respondents would decide to vaccinate their children but the main problem according to results was cost of vaccinae and only 39% of parents could afford the vaccination. Consequently, 97.5% of the respond- ents would option for vaccination in the case that it is free. Authors con- cluded that the social networks is the main stone in the campaigne focuses on the raising awareness of the need for HPV vaccination and cancer pre- vention, including disseminating information to the target population. Ac- cording to this and similar studies here in Serbia target population is stil need more informations about HPV vaccination and the role of parents and health workers is crucial, as the vaccine is not mandatory, and parents’ ap- proval is required but also the government of Serbia, have to make a great steps for health promotion and disease prevention. The governments of the European Union countries, as well as the government of Serbia, currently only spend a small part of the health budget for health promotion and dis- ease prevention – around 3%. Will it be enough for all these very important pre-steps to spread an information before decision to implement HPV vac- cination to buy it and to cover as much as it is possible of target population. We can not separate information and promotion programs and our wish to get coverage that wil justify the cost-effectiveness of the vaccination pro- gram. ___________________________ ___________________________ 11 References 1. Institute for public Health of Serbia „Dr Milan Jovanović Batut”. Incidence and mortality rate of cancers in Centra Serbia. Registar za rak u Centralnoj Srbiji 2015. Izveštaj br. 17 Beograd, 2017. 2. Register of malignant neoplasias in Vojvodina Oncology institute of Vojvodina (un-publish datas 2018). 3. Bruni L, Albero G, Serrano B, Mena M, Gómez D, Muñoz J, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S. ICO/IARC Information Centre on HPV and Cancer (HPV Information Centre). Hu- man Papillomavirus and Related Diseases in Serbia. Summary Report 17 June 2019. 4. Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, Znaor A, Soerjomataram I, Bray F (2018). Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today, accessed [05 October 2018]. 5. Naumovic T, Jovanovic V, Ilic D, Rakic U, Mirkov D, Perisic Z. Performance indica-tors col ected from primary health centres included in organised cervical cancer screening programme in the Republic of Serbia. J BUON. 2015 May-Jun;20(3):842-6. 6. Ministry of Health. The Institute of Public Health of Serbia. Results of the National Health Survey of the Republic of Serbia, 2013. Belgrade (2014). 7. Jelena Mitrović, Sandra Knežević, Jelena Žugić, Milica Kostić-Stanković, Marija Jović, Radmila Janičić. Creating social marketing strategy on the internet within preventive health care – human papilloma virus vaccination campaign. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2019 May-Jun;147(5-6):355-359 8. Health 2020. A European Policy Framework for Action at Al Levels of Government and Society for Health and Wel being. [Internet]. World Health Organization. 2012. Available from: http://www. zdravlje.gov.rs/downloads/2012/Decembar/WHO2020.pdf ___________________________ ___________________________ 12 Prevention of cervical cancer in Republic of N. Macedonia Goran Dimitrov Crude incidence rate of cervical cancer in the Republic of North Macedonia was 14.5. About 151 new cervical cancer cases are diagnosed annually in Macedonia (2018). Cervical cancer ranks as the 6th leading cause of female cancer in Macedonia. Cervical cancer is the 3rd most common female can- cer in women aged 15 to 44 years in Macedonia. About 59 cervical cancer deaths occur annual y in Macedonia (2018). Cervi- cal cancer ranks as the 11th leading cause of female cancer deaths in Mace- donia. Cervical cancer is the 5th leading cause of cancer deaths in women aged 15 to 44 years in Macedonia. [1] Based on the specified screening age range (24‐60 years), the population estimates for Macedonia in 2013 indicate the total eligible cervical screening population is ≈516,000 women. Therefore, using a 3-year screening interval, the total annual target population would be ≈172,000 women. [2] Cervical screening has also been funded by the government since 2006 when a program was established giving every women the right to voluntarily access free of charge screening through public hospitals. However, the initial cervi- cal screening participation rates were low so this service was transferred to PHC (Primary Health Care) gynecologists in 2010, who were also given responsibility for sending letters of invitation to eligible women registered with the HIF (Health Insurance Fund) and assigned to their practices. Ap- proximately 90% of Macedonian population is registered with the HIF so this system would ensure the majority of women aged 24-60 (the cervical screening age range) receive an invitation. However, no other elements of an organized cervical screening program have yet been implemented. [2] The type of screening test used in the Republic of N. Macedonia is not uni- form: 80% of the testing is done with a conventional Pap smear, and 20% with liquid-based cytology. Cytotechnologists and cytopathologists at 12 government based or private cytology laboratories use modified Bethesda ___________________________ ___________________________ 13 classification to evaluate cervical smears; however, there is no quality control monitoring program for cytology laboratories in the country. [3] The coverage of the target population of women has been relatively low (estimated on 15–25%), since the beginning of the opportunistic screening in 1967 til nowadays (2018). The initial try for organized screening in 2012 was char- acterized with a very low response rate to invitation letters (10-15%) and this correlates well with estimates that only 20,000 women were screened, compared to the “projected” total annual target of 172,000 women. [2] Although new updated screening Guidelines have been produced at the end of July, 2018 by an expert group formed by the Macedonian Society for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy, Ministry of Health, Health Insurance Fund, UNFPA-Macedonia and other stakeholders there has not been any signs for its implementation. The emphasis was on HPV testing as primary screening tool. The use of HPV testing is still for triage of women with borderline or ab- normal cytology results. Recommended and reimbursed indication for HPV testing in addition to borderline and low-grade cytology is also prediction of the outcome after treatment of CIN2+ (test of cure). HPV testing is per- formed in government-based or private microbiology/virology laboratories, mostly by in-house PCR tests. Both the quadrivalent and bivalent vaccine have been registered in Republic of North Macedonia: the quadrivalent one since 2007, and the bivalent one since 2008. The official recommendations for the use of HPV vaccines were issued in 2007 by the Commission for Contagious Diseases within the Min- istry of Health, the Macedonian Association of Gynecologists and Obstetri- cians, the HPV Society of Macedonia, and the Macedonian Society for Cer- vical Pathology and Colposcopy. Vaccination was recommended for females between 9 and 26 years old. By a decision of the Ministry of Health from 2008, HPV vaccination was introduced into the national immunization program in October 2009 as obligatory for 12-year-old girls. The quadriva- lent vaccine has been used in the national immunization program and is delivered through a school-based program. The catch-up vaccination (2009- 2011) was provided for 13 to 26-year old girls and women, and was free of charge and delivered through healthcare facilities. HPV vaccine coverage is monitored at the national level. Coverage for three doses increased from 37% for the 2009/2010 school year to 67% for the 2010/2011 school year, and then declined to 65% for the 2011/2012 school year. [4] In the school ___________________________ ___________________________ 14 year 2014/2015, with the decision of the Ministry of Health according to a procurement act, a revert to the bivalent vaccine has been done. From that time till now the vaccination is with the bivalent HPV vaccine. In the school year 2015/2016 the coverage even for 2 doses (of the bivalent vaccine) dropped to less than 50%. From June 2018 there is a National recommen- dation for gender neutral vaccination but stil only girls are vaccinated with- in the school Program. References 1. Bruni L, Albero G, Serrano B, Mena M, Gómez D, Muñoz J, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S. ICO/IARC Information Centre on HPV and Cancer (HPV Information Centre). Hu- man Papillomavirus and Related Diseases in Macedonia. Summary Report 17 June 2019. [Date Accessed: 30-10-2019] 2. Davies Philip & Dimitrievska Vera. (2015). Situation Analysis of Cancer Breast, Cervical and Prostate Cancer Screening in Macedonia. 10.13140/RG.2.1.3749.1922. [Date Accessed: 30-10-2019] 3. Maver PJ, Seme K, Korać T, Dimitrov G, Döbrőssy L, Engele L, Iljazović E, Kesić V et al. Cervical cancer screening practices in central and eastern Europe in 2012. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat. 2013;22(1):7-19. 4. Seme K, Maver P, Korać T, Canton A, Cástková J, Dimitrov Go. et al. (2013). Current status of human papil omavirus vaccination implementation in central and eastern Europe. Acta dermatovenerologica Alpina, Panonica, et Adriatica. 22. 21-25. ___________________________ ___________________________ 15 Prevention of cervical cancer in Bosnia and Herzegovina Ermina Iljazović Abstract: : Bosnia and Herzegovina do not have a population-based registry of malignant disease. Crude incidence rate in B&H was from 23.07 in 2011 to 29.14 in 2015 (per 100.000 women aged 15 and older). B&H has an opportunistic instead of organized screening, based on cytology (mostly conventional Pap test). According to the Strategy of the control, prevention and monitoring of malignant disease in FB&H for 2012-2020, a target population are woman aged 21 to 60 ys. The main aim is to reach women ages from 21 to 60 with recommended guidelines to reach 70% of recom- mended screening. According to the data from the Retrospective International Survey and HPV Time Trends Study Group (UCC Tuzla lab was participated in the project) the incidence of HPV infection in the cervical cancer tissue was 55.17%, mostly present as single infection. Al types of HPV vaccine are registered in B&H, but without any recommendation who should be vaccinated. Introduction: Bosnia and Herzegovina do not have a population-based reg- istry of malignant disease and the number of new cases, of cervical cancer per year, varies depending on the size of the city or region. According to the recent study in East Europe, based mostly on the estimation from neigh- bouring countries, crude incidence rate for Bosnia and Herzegovina is 26.6. According to the report of Public Health Institute in FB&H, incidence of cervical cancer is on the second place, just after breast cancer. In this study we presented preliminary data of approximate cervical cancer incidence in Bosnia and Herzegovina, col ected during the period of 2011 til 2015. Crude incidence rate in B&H was from 23.07 in 2011 to 29.14 in 2015 (per 100.000 women aged 15 and older). B&H has an opportunistic instead of organized screening, based on cytology (mostly conventional Pap test). According to the Strategy of the control, prevention and monitoring of ma- lignant disease in FB&H for 2012-2020, a target population are woman ___________________________ ___________________________ 16 aged 21 to 60 ys. The main aim is to reach women ages from 21 to 60 with recommended guidelines to reach 70% of recommended screening. Infection with one of the few oncogenic human papil omavirus (HPV) types is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer. HPV testing in Bosnia and Herzegovina started at 2000. in Tuzla University Clinical Center, and today is the most experience laboratory in this field and the greatest number of the performed tests (Qiagen HRHPV DNA II). There is not unique data inci- dence for whole country yet, but most complete and most reliable data (12 years data base) exist for the Tuzla region. According to the data from the Retrospective International Survey and HPV Time Trends Study Group (UCC Tuzla lab was participated in the project) the incidence of HPV in- fection in the cervical cancer tissue was 55.17%, mostly present as single infection. The frequency of HPV infection among female in the same region is between 31.37% (2001.) and 59.25% (2003.) with more stable rate over the past 6 years (app 45%). The HPV incidence at Sarajevo region is also app 45%, with 47.7% in 2005. and 45.9% in 2011. All types of HPV vaccine are registered in B&H, but without any recom- mendation who should be vaccinated. Conclusion: Presented data are of limited value due to lack of official last census data (2013) as well as lack of data base registry. Although of limited value, these data represent the more relevant results than the available data in the literature. All those facts underline the importance of the adoption of organized screen- ing programme. One of the first steps of Bosnia and Herzegovina in the near future should be establishing of the registry of malignant disease, Pap test database and setting up wel -organized cervical cancer prevention pro- grammes as proposed by the European Council Recommendation. Key words: cervical cancer, HPV status, incidence, Bosnia and Herzegovina References 1. 1. Iljazović E, Mehinović N, Ljuca D, Karasalihović Z, Adžajlić A, Omeragić F, Avdić S. Estimate of cervical cancer incidence and mortality rate in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Col Antropol. 2014 Sep;38(3):933-7. 2. Iljazović E, Mena M, Tous S, Alemany L, Omeragić F, Sadiković A, Clavero O, Vergara M, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S. Human papil omavirus genotype distribution in invasive ___________________________ ___________________________ 17 cervical cancer in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Cancer Epidemiol. 2014 Oct;38(5):504-10. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Aug 11. 3. Strategy for prevention, treatment and control of malignant disease in FB&H from 2012-2020. Sarajevo, December 2011. (file:///C:/Users/l_erm/Downloads/Strategija%20za%20prevenciju%20i%20kontrolu% 20malignih%20neoplazmi%202012-2020%20(4).pdf ___________________________ ___________________________ 18 National Cervical Cancer Screening Programme in Montenegro Đurđica Ostojić 1 What is the incidence of cervical cancer in Montenegro? The first annual report of the Registry of Malignant Neoplasms of Monte- negro presents the basic data on the morbidity and mortality from malig- nant neoplasms in Montenegro for 2013. The most frequent malignant neoplasms sites in females were: • breast, • non-melanoma malignant skin neoplasms, • colon, rectum and anus, • trachea, lung and bronchus, • cervix uteri, and corpus uteri. Among young adults (20-34 years), the leading malignant neoplasms site in males was testicular neoplasm (42.4%), and neoplasms of breast and cervix uteri were the most frequent sites in females (25.8% each). In the age group 35-49 years, most frequently reported sites in males were lung neoplasms (23.3%), and breast (36.6%) and cervix uteri (20.6%) neoplasms in females. According the first annual report of the Registry of Malignant Neoplasms of Montenegro, 106 women are diagnosed cervical cancer in 2013. With an age-standardized incidence rate (world standard WHO 2001) of 27,6/100.000 Montenegro has one of the highest cervical cancer incidence rates in Europe. 2 How is cervical cancer screening program organized? Does it fulfil criteria for the organised population-based programme? National cervical cancer screening program in Montenegro is being con- ducted in accordance with the recommendations of the European Guide- lines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening Second Edition ___________________________ ___________________________ 19 Supplements, EU 2015 and the Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Control: A guide to essential practice - 2nd edition, 2014. Legal framework for this programme and data management is in place. The target group for the National Cervical Cancer Screening Programme are women registered to chosen doctors for women- gynecologists in Primary Health Care Centres. The organized screening programme which includes screening test, additional diagnostics and treatment is free of charge for al participants. 3 What are the age range of the target population and the frequency of screening? According to the National Programme for early detection of cervical cancer in Montenegro, target population age range is 30-64.The screening pilot project began on July 18, 2016 in municipality Podgorica. Target popula- tion were women aged 30-34 years. Organised, population-based, nation- wide screening programme was implemented on February 1, 2018. Target population were women aged 30-34 years, in Podgorica women aged 30-36 and from February 1, 2019. target population are women aged 30-42 years. Programme is managed by Ministry of Health and Institute for Public Health of Montenegro, which collect data, monitor and evaluate each step of the programme. 4 What test is used in the primary screening? Do we use liquid- based technology? Screening is performed with HPV DNA test as a primary screening test within 18 Primary Health Care Centers in Montenegro. The screening cycle is five years. The accredited HPV testing laboratory is located at the Insti- tute for Public Health of Montenegro. The Abbott RealTime hrHPV test detects the fol owing genotypes: HPV16, HPV18 and hrHPV (31,33,35,39,45,51,52,56,58,59,66,68). The result of the test can be: positive (with some of the genotypes individual y identified or combinations), negative, inadequate and negative that should be repeated after 12 months. HPV positive women are called for colposcopy and after three months liq- uid-based cytology (LBC) testing. The period between HPV DNA testing and LBC sampling is three months because tests that are used for these tests ___________________________ ___________________________ 20 are from different manufacturers. Premature sampling of the PAPA test by the LBC method in less than three months period from the HPV testing might induce false negative results. The PAPA LBC method is examined by pathologists at the Pathology Clinic of Clinical Center of Montenegro. 5 How is the invitation system organized? What is the coverage of the target population with invitations? What is the coverage of the target population with screening tests? Screening programme is conducted in Public health care system in Monte- negro, organized in three levels: 1. Primary health care level (18 Primary Health Care Centers in al mu- nicipalities) 2. Secondary health care level (General Hospitals in the seven largest cit- ies) 3. Tertiary health care level (Institute for Public Health and Clinical Centre of Montenegro in Podgorica). Screening programme is supported by electronic health information system (e-HIS) at all health care levels and for every step of the process. Teams of chosen gynecologists call women (from the group of target popu- lation) by phone or SMS and schedule an appointment. If the woman does not respond, she is called two more times: after 3 and after 6 months. Screening participants fulfill two questionnaires. The first questionnaire aims to identify possible risk factors for cervical cancer, and the second ques- tionnaire is eliminatory - with questions from personal and family history. In 2018, 10,677 women or 52.23% of the planned cohort were invited to participate in the program. A total of 7,038 (65.92%) women responded to the invitation to participate in the cervical cancer screening program, and 6,634 (94.26%) were sampled for HPV testing (cervical swabs). 6 How is HPV vaccination organised? What is vaccination coverage? Do we vaccinate girls and boys? Montenegro is in the process of implementation of HPV vaccination for girls. Start of the programme is planned for the end of the current year. ___________________________ ___________________________ 21 Cervical cancer prevention In Finland Pekka Nieminen Incidence in year 2017: 4,8 and mortality 1,0 (world standard) (www.cancer.fi) Organized nationwide screening from year 1963 Also a lot of opportunistic screening Invitations are drawn from the population registry. Cal -recall system. All 30-60 year old women are invited with 5 year interval, some municipali- ties invite also 25 and 65 year old women. Target population: 1,3 million women Coverage of invitations is 98 %, attendance rate to organized screening is 72 % Referral to colposcopy 1,1%, follow-up cytology recommended in 5,4% CIN 2+ cases 0,4% of screened women ( in programme) Over 90% of 20-65 year-old women have had at least one Pap-smear during the last 5 years (organized, opportunistic or both) A shift from the conventional Pap-smear to HrHPV-test in primary screen- ing is going on in Finland. Year 2019 the Southern Finland implemented HPV-screening with cytology triage. No co-testing. Very little LBC is used in the screening. National HPV vaccination started in year 2013. Target group is 10-11 year- old girls. School based vaccination. Coverage is 70%. The programme wil be gender-neutral in year 2020, when boys wil be included. Bi-valent con- nive presently. ___________________________ ___________________________ 22 Prevention of cervical cancer in Slovenia Urška Ivanuš What is the incidence of cervical cancer in Slovenia? The population-level effects of organised population-based screening in Slovenia can already be observed with cervical cancer incidence reducing by half since the implementation of organised population-based cervical cancer screening programme ZORA in 2003 (Table 1). In the recent years, approx- imately 120 women are diagnosed and 40‒50 women die in Slovenia every year because of cervical cancer. With an age-standardized incidence rate (world standard) of about 7/100.000 and mortality rate of about 2/100.000 women, Slovenia is one of the European countries with the lowest cervical cancer burden. This is an outstanding achievement, since Slovenia used to have one of the highest cervical cancer incidence rates in Europe. In 2017, Slovenia observed a record low cervical cancer incidence with only 85 new cases of cervical cancer (Table 1). This is undoubtedly a good news, but it should be interpreted with caution and re-evaluated in a year or two because of the smal number of patients. Nevertheless, the decreasing trend in cervical cancer incidence in the recent years indicates Slovenia is, similarly to other countries with well-organised screening and vaccination programmes, fol owing a path outlined in the spring of 2018 by the World Health Organization – the path to cervical cancer elimination. ___________________________ ___________________________ 23 Table 1. The incidence of cervical cancer since the implementation of programme ZORA. Cervical cancer incidence data source is Cancer Registry of Slovenia, which is a dynamic database with possible changes in the number of new cases. Number of new cases is regularly updated in case of major changes via the website ZORA (https:/ zora.onko-i.si/) . More information on cervical cancer and CIN3 up to 2016 can be found on the website SLORA (www.slora.si). Number of new Number of new cervical cancer Age-standardized incidence rate YEAR cervical cancer cases/100.000 women (crude of cervical cancer/100.000 cases (incidence) incidence rate) women (world standard) 2017 85 8,2 4,9 2016 123 11,8 7,8 2015 119 11,4 7,4 2014 114 11,0 6,8 2013 124 11,9 8,0 2012 118 11,4 7,7 2011 142 13,7 9,0 2010 141 13,6 9,3 2009 131 12,7 8,8 2008 130 12,7 8,8 2007 154 15,0 10,5 2006 162 15,8 11,3 2005 182 17,8 12,7 2004 198 19,4 13,7 2003 211 20,7 15,3 How is cervical cancer screening program organized? Does it fulfil criteria for the organised population-based programme? Organised, population-based, nationwide screening programme ZORA was implemented in 2003. The organised screening process includes screening, diagnostics, treatment and fol ow-up after treatment (Figure 1). Programme is managed by the coordination office at the Institute of Oncology Ljublja- na, which (in collaboration with the experts) provide guidelines, collect data, monitor and evaluate each step of the process. Target population are women aged 20–64 years. Screening is performed with conventional cytology within primary health care network of gynaecologists every 3 years. National evi- ___________________________ ___________________________ 24 dence-based national guidelines are aligned with the European guidelines for women's management and laboratory procedures. Legal regulations exists for programme and data management (2 new regulations in 2018, aligned with GDPR). Centralised and personalised screening registry registers per- sonalised data on women and is nightly synchronised with Central Popula- tion Registry, it is also linked to Cancer registry of Republic of Slovenia. Copies of all cervical cytology results, HPV test results and all cervical histopathology results including information about the hysterectomy from al women are sent to the central screening registry, regardless the reason for the test or procedure. Cytology and HPV data are standardised and received in electronic format, histopathology reports are not yet standardised and are received as a paper copy of the original report. Programme has public fund- ing. What are the age range of the target population and the frequency of screening? Screening is performed with conventional cytology within primary health care network of gynaecologists every 3 years. What test is used in the primary screening? Do we use liquid- based technology? Conventional cytology is used for screening since the introduction of the programme in 2003. Due to the good quality of smears (inadequacy rates are lower than 1%) there was no need to introduce liquid-based cytology in the past. However, according to new HPV-related knowledge and new technologies available, Slovenia is considering the introduction of HPV screening in women aged 35(30) years and more and in girls who were vac- cinated against HPV within the national vaccination programme. The two of the first steps in the project of the renewal of the Slovenian cervical cancer screening policy are: (1) the introduction of liquid-based technology, that enables reflex testing with different tests (project started in 2019); (2) the renewal of the cervical cancer screening information system, that enables the real-time exchange of data between clinicians, laboratories and different national databases (including HPV vaccination registry) which will in the future enable risk-stratified screening, according to women’s age, HPV- vaccination status and some other risk-factors (project started in 2017). ___________________________ ___________________________ 25 Figure 1. Clinical path of women in Slovenian cervical cancer screening programme ZORA How is the invitation system organised? What is the coverage of the target population with invitations? What is the coverage of the target population with screening tests? Women have free access to their personal gynaecologists and do not need a special invitation to schedule a screening appointment. If a woman fails to make an appointment on time, her personal gynaecologist should invite her to make one (with a reminder if needed). The central cervical screening registry serves as a final supervisor of screening attendance. Women who not ___________________________ ___________________________ 26 had cytology result registered for four years, receive a central invitation, which is sent to her in the fifth year by the central coordination office at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana. With the new information system that is under development, gynaecologists will have an option to choose to contin- ue to use the current invitation protocol, or all the protocol where all the invitations wil be sent from the central coordination office. Regular screening attendance is key for diagnosing precancerous and early cancerous lesions of the cervix. In the past five years, a little over 80% of women in the target population were screened in Slovenia, which places us amongst the most successful European countries. The recent three-year screening test coverage rate in Slovenia is over 70%, which is in line with our goals (Figure 2). The coverage rate in women aged 50 to 64 years has not reached our target values; however, in this age group coverage is slowly increasing (Figure 1). There are also differences in the coverage between the administrative units, three out of nine regions did not reach targeted 70% coverage in the last 3-year period (Figure 3). Figure 2. The three year coverage of the target population (%) by age in three three-year intervals (1 July 2009‒30 June 2012, 1 July 2012‒30 June 2015, 1 July 2015‒30 June 2018). (Reference: Zora Registry, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, January 2019, available at https:/ zora.onko- i.si/publikacije/kazalniki). ___________________________ ___________________________ 27 Figure 3. The three year coverage of the target population in Slovenian regions in last three three-year interval (1 July 2015‒30 June 2018). (Reference: Zora Registry, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, January 2019, available at https:/ zora.onko-i.si/publikacije/kazalniki). HPV test used in Slovenia and how is it used. HPV test was introduced in Slovenian cervical cancer screening programme ZORA in 2011 as a triage test and as test of cure after HSIL treatment. In- dications for HPV triage are low grade cervical pathology (cytological con- firmed ASC-US, cytological confirmed LISL≥35 years old or histologically confirmed LSIL) or histologically negative AGC-NOS. Hybrid Capture 2 test (Qiagen, Germany) is used since the introduction of HPV test in 2011. According to the Regulation on cancer screening two laboratories in the country, can perform HPV testing. If HPV test wil become a screening test in the future, we will strongly consider to select only one, clinically validated HPV test for all indications where HPV test will be used: screening of older women and HPV vaccinated, triage of younger women stil screened with cytology and possibly also for HPV-self sampling of non-responders to regu- lar screening. We are and we wil strongly recommend against opportunistic use of HPV test outside the organised screening, especial y in young women. ___________________________ ___________________________ 28 How is HPV vaccination organised? What is vaccination coverage? Do we vaccinate girls and boys? Slovenia has been vaccinating girls in the 6th grade of primary school against HPV free of charge since 2009, with the possibility of free vaccinations for order girls who missed their scheduled vaccination (catch-up vaccination). In last years, a 9-valent vaccine is used. According to the National Institute of Public Health (NIPH), the routine HPV vaccination coverage is around 50%, which is too low. In 2019 NIPH proposed to include also boys at 6th grade in the national vaccination schedule, however this is not yet imple- mented. Main messages on cervical cancer screening Cervical cancer is an exception amongst cancers, since we now have suffi- cient knowledge and technology available to be able to prevent almost every new case. This is why in 2018, the World Health Organization issued a global call for action towards the elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem with HPV vaccination, organised cervical cancer screening and treatment of cervical lesions with the cut-off level for elimination set at cervical cancer incidence rate (world standard) 4/100.000 women. The slow and gradual development of cervical cancer allows us to use differ- ent ways of preventing cervical cancer with primary prevention measures (healthy lifestyle, HPV vaccination) as well as with secondary (early detec- tion and treatment of precancerous and early cancerous cervical lesions in organised population-based screening programmes (Figure 4). Vaccination is very effective and safe and it is able to prevent 70-90% of al cervical cancers and high-grade precancerous lesions. Because vaccinated women can stil develop disease from a HPV genotype not covered by the vaccine, vaccinat- ed women should also attend screening. In order to achieve the optimal balance between harms and benefits of screening, only organised, population-based screening should be considered and implemented. Screening programmes should be organised according to Council recommendation on cancer screening (2003) and European guide- lines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening (2008 with extension about HPV testing and vaccination in 2015). ___________________________ ___________________________ 29 Figure 4. The prevalence of infection with at least one high risk HPV (green line, left axis) and the incidence of precancerous lesions HSIL/CIN3 and cervical cancer (blue and red line, right axis) in Slovenia, by age. The dashed line represents data extrapolated from foreign studies, since Slovenian data for these age groups do not exist. Reference: prevalence study of HPV infections in Slovenia (Učakar et al, Vaccine 2012) and website of Cancer registry of Slovenia – SLORA, for years 2005‒2009 (Institute of Oncology Ljubljana). ___________________________ ___________________________ 30 What can we learn from each other in our region? Suggestions for future activities Joško Zekan, Southeast European HPV Forum Abstract: During the transition period, most of the Southeast European countries experienced significant changes in the healthcare system, especial y in the area of medical general practice. Privatization waves have significantly influenced health standards and the availability of health care. Part of the health care has been significantly improved. However, one part of health care has maintained the previous standards or there has been a weakening, especially in the case of diseases and conditions that have a public health significance. Among the world’s leading causes of morbidity and mortality, cervical cancer have understandably been the primary focus of research and development and the dominant motivation for international cooperative efforts at prevention and control. Objectives: Successfully organized, population-based cervical cancer screening programs have not yet been implemented in most southeast European countries, despite the greatest burden of cervical cancer. Effective perfor- mance of the national program of organized screening in Slovenia started in 2003. Incidence of cervical cancer decreased since then by 44%. However, from 2012 to 2016 the incidence of cervical cancer recorded the plateau. HPV vaccine coverage is about 50%. In Croatia, the organized cervical can- cer screening started in 2012. Through 3 years of program, the incidence of disease was reduced by 18%. Since 2015, gender-neutral vaccination has been integrated into national immunization schedule and currently provides routine vaccination free of charge to the primary target population. Unfortunately, coverage by vaccination is less than 20% at the state level. In Bulgaria, Romania, Serbia, and Macedonia the implementation of organized cervical cancer prevention programs are in progress, current standard is op- portunistic screening. Montenegro implemented organized HPV-based screening program In July 2016 (the only HPV-based program in the re- gion). Also, there are no reliable data on HPV vaccination uptake. National- ___________________________ ___________________________ 31 based screening solutions need to be found, while being cognizant of the criteria that have enabled successful screening programs. Conclusions: The reframed programs of cervical cancer prevention will include strategic combinations of at least two major components: extension and advancement of existing screening programs using HPV-based technology and routine introduction of HPV vaccines to both sex in all countries. Success in basic, clinical and epidemiological research has expanded the possibilities of cervical cancer prevention by introducing HPV-based cervical cancer screen- ing and most importantly, by making available remarkably efficacious prophy- lactic HPV vaccines. Understanding the nature of these tools, how to use them and how to evaluate their impact is a pressing social demand for the scientific, medical and public health communities. HPV vaccine uptake is reported, and support for conceptual models that move beyond purely moti- vational accounts of HPV vaccine uptake is adduced. The Southeast European HPV Forum is a non-profit and non-governmental organization of southeast European countries with a goal to promote the research of all aspects of hu- man papillomavirus (HPV) infection, to study diseases caused by HPV and help to implement and/or improve primary and secondary prevention pro- grams of cervical cancer and other HPV-related tumors. References 1. Poljak M. Towards cervical cancer eradication: joint force of HPV vaccination and HPV-based cervical cancer screening. Clin Microbiol Infect 2015;21:806-7. 2. Catarino R, Petignat R,Dongui G, Pierre Vassilakos P. Cervical cancer screening in developing countries at a crossroad: Emerging technologies and policy choices. World J Clin Oncol 2015;6: 281–290. 3. Májek O, Anttila A, Arbyn M, van Veen EB, Engesæter B, Lönnberg S. The legal framework for European cervical cancer screening programmes. Eur J Public Health 2019;29:345-350. 4. Vaccarel a S, Franceschi S, Zaridze D, Poljak M, Veerus P, Plummer M, Bray F. Preventable fractions of cervical cancer via effective screening in six Baltic, central, and eastern European countries 2017-40: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:1445-1452. 5. Basu P, Ponti A, Anttila A, Ronco G, Senore C, Vale DB, Segnan N, Tomatis M, Soerjomataram I, Primic Žakelj M, Dil ner J, Elfström KM, Lönnberg S, Sankaranarayanan R. Status of implementation and organization of cancer screening in The European Union Member States-Summary results from the second European screening report. Int J Cancer 2018;142:44-56. ___________________________ ___________________________ 32 Cervical cancer Vitaly Smelov WHO recommends a comprehensive approach for cervical cancer preven- tion and control that has 3 pil ars: • Primary prevention, which consists mainly in HPV vaccination of girls 9-13 years. HPV vaccination does not fully abolish the need for cervical cancer screening in vaccinated cohorts as it does not prevent 100% of cervical cancers. • Secondary prevention, which consists in screening and for those found positive, follow-up and treatment. Cervical cancer screening should primarily be ensured for women aged 30-49. • Tertiary prevention, which ensures that women with invasive can- cer have rapid access to diagnosis and effective treatment, as well as pal iative care if needed. WHO guidelines on cervical cancer screening specify that: • HPV test, PAP smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) are al recommended screening tests, with a preference for HPV test. Pap test is not recommended if it is not already existing and functioning in the country. HPV test can be used alone or be fol- lowed by a triage test • Cryotherapy, loop electrosurgical excision procedure (e.g. LLETZ or LEEP) and thermal ablation can provide effective and appropri- ate treatment for the majority of women who screen positive for cervical pre-cancer; • Screening needs to be performed at least once in a lifetime for every woman aged 30-49. If resources allows, frequency of screening should be intensified, up to every 5 years if using HPV test and eve- ry 3 years if using PAP smear. Shortening further screening intervals increase costs without bringing any substantial health benefit. • Screening should primarily be proposed to women aged 30-49. If high coverage is obtained and resources are available then older co- ___________________________ ___________________________ 33 horts may be screened, up to 60 or 65 year of age. Screening with HPV test before age 30 is not recommended because of the high rate of false positives. Screening with cytology or VIA before 25 is not encouraged for the same reason. Screening does not only carry potential for benefit but also for harms (e.g. false negative/positive tests, too aggressive/suboptimal treatments of pre- cancerous lesions, anxiety, (in)direct financial costs associated, etc). To secure the benefits of screening and minimize the harms, quality is the key. Low quality screening results in no benefit while harms were observed, which is unethical and has to be avoided at all cost. High quality screening requires: • Minimizing false positives and false negatives: those depend highly on performance of professionals running the tests. Professionals must be informed about their performances in order to be able to improve, keeping in mind that false positives and false negatives can never be totally avoided. • Rapid, efficient, safe and free-of-charge follow up for women screened positive: Fol ow-up is ful y part of the screening program and has to be planned, given resources and implemented prior to launching the program. A referral system should also be implement- ed. • High screening coverage of the target population: Population-based screening has to be preferred to opportunistic screening. • Equity: special efforts need to be made to screen “hard to reach” women (e.g. poor/rural population). • Information systems: monitoring of process and outcome are crucial for attaining and for maintaining quality, and for guiding further improvement. ___________________________ ___________________________ 34 Document Outline Contents Contributing authors Prevention of cervical cancer in Balkan region and in Finland in the HPV era: An introduction to brief reports from representatives of different countries Prevention of cervical cancer in Croatia Prevention of cervical cancer in Serbia Prevention of cervical cancer in Republic of N. Macedonia Prevention of cervical cancer in Bosnia and Herzegovina National Cervical Cancer Screening Programme in Montenegro Cervical cancer prevention In Finland Prevention of cervical cancer in Slovenia What can we learn from each other in our region? Suggestions for future activities Cervical cancer