Acta Chim. Slov. 2006, 53, 29–35 29 Minireview Comparison of Different Characteristics of TiO2 Films and Their Photocatalytic Properties† Urh Černigoj, Urška Lavrenčič Štangar, Polonca Trebše, Primož Rebernik Ribič Nova Gorica Polytechnic, P.O.B. 301, 5001-Nova Gorica, Slovenia Received 12-07-2005 †Paper based on a presentation at the 14th International Symposium “Spectroscopy in Theory and Practice”, Nova Gorica, Slovenia, 2005. Abstract TiO2 is known as a photocatalyst and is often utilized for the oxidative mineralisation of pollutants. The correlation between the thickness, mass, surface topography and the type of support of the titania films and their photocatalytic activities were studied in this work. TiO2 films were deposited on two different glass supports via sol-gel methods. Film thicknesses and weights have been measured. Film surfaces were characterized by AFM measurements. The presence of surfactant in the sol and the type of support influence the morphology of film’s surface and the UV absorption characteristics. The addition of surfactants also increases the thicknesses of calcined films. For the photocatalytic experiments the titania film was immersed in an aqueous solution of Plasmocorinth B. Sodium glass support reduces the photocatalytic activity compared to protected glass support with a thin silica layer. The photocatalytic activity was found to increase with the number of TiO2 layers in all cases. However, when comparing different films with the same number of TiO2 layers, the addition of Pluronic F-127 surfactant in the sol was shown to have a significant positive effect on the photocatalytic activity. The use of this surfactant results in thicker and heavier films and consequently in more efficient absorption of UVA light. Key words: TiO2 thin films, UV-Vis, surface morphology, photocatalysis, azo dye. Introduction Conventional water purification methods often do not successfully deal with chemically and microbiologically stable synthetic organic compounds that are dissolved in water at low concentrations (textile dyes, agricultural or industrial effluents). In order to cleanse water of these extra-stable organics, so-called Advanced Oxidation Methods (AOMs) have been developed. Most AOMs are ambient-temperature processes that use energy to produce highly reactive intermediates of high oxidizing or reducing potential, which then attack and destroy the target compounds. TiO2 photocatalysis belongs to AOMs. The photocatalytic behaviour of TiO2 has been the subject of intensive studies for more than 20 years.1-3 Basically, the photocatalytic process is initiated by the photogeneration of hole/electron pairs in the semiconductor by absorption of UV-light with energy equal to or higher than the corresponding band gap. Electrons and holes can either recombine, dissipate energy, or be available for redox reactions with electron-donor or acceptor species, adsorbed at the semiconductor surface or localized in the electrical double layer surrounding the particle. In the second scenario, positive holes oxidize water molecules or OH– ions with the formation of highly reactive hydroxyl radicals. On the other hand adsorbed oxygen molecules react with negative electrons producing superoxide anions, which can be in the following steps converted to hydrogen peroxide and also to hydroxyl radicals, both able to oxidize stable organic molecules. TiO2 is mostly used in a powder form for photocatalytic experiments.4-6 However, the major drawback of slurry-type photoreactors is the final particle-fluid separation for the catalyst recycling. If TiO2 is immobilized on a rigid support as a thin (nano-or micro-scale) film, such a problem is avoided. A large number of studies have been made in the last ten years to immobilize the catalyst on a rigid support via different deposition techniques, such as chemical or physical vapour deposition, spray pyrolysis, sol-gel technique etc.3 Sol gel process is among all other processes most frequently used because of its relatively low cost and flexible applicability to wide range of size and shape of substrate (deposition on optical fibers7, spherical ceramic balls8, glass rods9 etc). However, there are certain problems regarding Černigoj et al. Comparison of Different Characteristics of TiO2 Films and 30 Acta Chim. Slov. 2006, 53, 29–35 Table 1. Composition of titania sols the symbol Ti precursor complexing of titania sol - Ti(OiPr)4 agent U 8.96 mL AcOH 1.74 mL R 8.96 mL AcOH 1.74 mL D 8.96 mL EAA 3.94 mL C 8.96 mL EAA 3.94 mL the photocatalytic activity of the immobilized TiO2 i.e. (i) a lower rate of electron and hole transfer across the semiconductor-solution interface because of the decreased catalyst’s surface in immobilized TiO2; (ii) light absorption characteristics because of the limited amount of TiO2 particles capable of absorbing the light; (iii) a substrate since it may have a negative influence on the photocatalytic activities of the titania films.3 Nanostructured materials are preferred over dense structures, because of their larger active surface. The production of nanostructured films is nowadays an established method and TiO2 nanoparticles and mesoporous films are among the materials routinely produced through the sol-gel chemistry processing.10-14 It is very important to prepare TiO2 films that are capable of harvesting incident light to a great extent, and at the same time films with a high surface area and porosity to increase the rate of reaction between photogenerated species and the pollutants.15-18 In this work, we have tested the photocatalytic activities of TiO2 films prepared by dip-coating deposition from sols containing two different surfactants as templating agents. The effects of different supports, thickness, weight and surface structure of the films on their efficiencies for photocatalytic decolorisation of an aqueous solution of azo dye were evaluated. Plasmocorinth B, a member of a group of azo dyes was chosen as a model compound. It is known that toxicity and potentially carcinogenic nature of azo dyes and their precursors represent an increasing danger to aquatic life. Therefore the investigations of azo dye degradation are important. Several studies still nowadays deal with the photocatalytic treatment of aqueous wastes containing single or mixed azo dyes.19-22 Experimental 1 Preparation of sols SiO2 sol: Tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) (15.0 g) was dissolved in ethanol (EtOH) (22.0 g). Separately 11.5% solution of nitric(V) acid was prepared by dissolving concentrated (65%) nitric(V) acid (1.85 g) in water (10.5 g). After ten minutes both solutions were mixed together and the resultant sol was used after ageing at room temperature for two hours. The sol was unstable, solvent - surfactant MeOCH2CH2OH 30.4 mL / 30.4 mL Brij 56 7 g 32.4 mL / 32.4 mL Pluronic F-127 4.7 g it gelled in one day and therefore it was always freshly prepared. TiO2 sols: Titanium(IV) isopropoxide (Ti(OiPr)4) was added to acetic acid (AcOH) or to ethyl acetoacetate (EAA) during constant stirring. The prepared solution was dissolved in 2-methoxyethanol (MeOCH2CH2OH) after 5 minutes.23 The resultant alkoxide solution was stirred at room temperature for solvolysis and condensation reactions at least for three hours. After using, the sol was kept in the refrigerator. It was conditioned at room temperature for at least one hour before the next use. The procedure for the preparation of the sols with added surfactants was basically the same as described above. The only difference was that the surfactant, either polyoxyethylene(10) cetyl ether (Brij 56) or triblock copolymer Pluronic F-127, was dissolved in the sol after the addition of MeOCH2CH2OH.24 The quantities of particular chemicals, used for different TiO2 sols preparation, are given in Table 1. 2 Deposition of films TiO2 films: Soda-lime glass plates (75 mm x 25 mm x 1 mm) were washed with ethanol and dried before use. The TiO2 films were deposited on them using the dip-coating technique with a withdrawal speed of 10 cm/min. The substrates coated with gel films were left at room temperature in air for 30 min and then they were calcined at 500 °C for 30 min. The thickness of the TiO2 films was increased by repeating the dipping and heat-treatment cycle up to five times. SiO2 protecting layer: The SiO2 protective layer was deposited on the sodium glass support from SiO2 sol by the dip–coating technique in an ambient atmosphere. The withdrawal speed was 5 cm/min. The substrates coated with gel films were left at room temperature in air for 30 min and then they were calcined at 500 °C for 30 min. TiO2 films were deposited on SiO2 protective layer as it is described above. 3 Characterization of films Thicknesses of TiO2 films deposited from sols U, R, D and C on SiO2 precoated sodium glass by 1, 3 and 5 coating-heating cycles have been measured. For this purpose, a part of the coating was removed from the Černigoj et al. Comparison of Different Characteristics of TiO2 Films and Acta Chim. Slov. 2006, 53, 29–35 31 substrate by a mixture of zinc powder and concentrated HCl until the sharp step was obtained between the substrate and the intact TiO2 film. Thicknesses of titania films were measured with a Talysurf profilometer (Taylor – Hobson). Absorption spectra (340 - 400 nm spectral range) of clean and calcined both-sided TiO2 films deposited on two different supports were recorded on HP 8453 UV-Vis spectrophotometer. Sodium glass, protected with SiO2 layer, was used as a blank. The band gap energies were calculated and estimated from UV-transmission spectra of the titania films according to Sreemany and Sen.25 Surface topography of TiO2 films made by 1 dipping-heating cycle was evaluated by atomic force microscopy (AFM) on CP-II scanning probe microscope (Veeco) in non-contact mode at constant force in air. The tip was also a Veeco product (model RFESPA-M). 4 Photocatalytic experiments A flow cell was constructed from Teflon and boral glass with the capability of purging with different gases, cooling with tap water and on-line absorbance measuring of the solutions. A 335 nm cut-off filter was used in front of the photocatalytic cell. A 125 W Xe lamp (Cermax xenon parabolic lamp) was used as a light source. One side of TiO2 thin film (23 mm x 23 mm) was irradiated along the normal direction. Aqueous solution (4.8 mL) of Plasmocorinth B – 3-(5-chloro-2-hydroxyphenylazo)-4,5-dihydroxy-2,7-naphthalene disulfonic acid, disodium salt (insert in Figure 5) – (40 mg/L) was used as a photodegradation medium in the experiments. The solution was constantly purged with oxygen during the irradiation. The peristaltic pump Heidolph PD 5001 with silicon hose was used to drive the solution with the rate of 10 mL/min from the flow cell to the sample compartment of the UV-Vis spectrophotometer and back to the flow cell. Thus, on-line measuring of the absorbance of the solution was possible. Results and discussion 1 Film characterization It is expected that more viscous sol is obtained when surfactant with higher molecular weight is added to the primary sol. Pluronic F-127 has molecular weight of 12600 g/mol and it is a much larger molecule than, for example, Brij 56 with molecular weight of 363 g/mol. The expectations were confirmed, since thicker and crack-free films were obtained from sols with added Pluronic F-127. The other observations were that linear dependence exists between the thicknesses of the films and number of layers (Figure 1) and that the thicknesses of the films, deposited from the same sol on different supports, are the same. Figure 1. The influence of number of TiO2 layers on thicknesses of the titania films Along with a thickness increase, the mass of titania films also increased when using surfactants (Table 2). An interesting observation was that the density of the film, deposited from the sol with added Pluronic F-127, was only half as dense as film without added Pluronic F-127. Supposing that we had the same crystalline phase in both cases (anatase) it could be concluded that the film with added Pluronic F-127 in the sol was more porous than the others. The presence of anatase phase in all cases was confirmed with XRD measurements of titania films.24 Another contribution to lower density of the films obtained by using surfactants may be also the higher portion of amorphous phase (having undefined structure and density) in the templated films, where the crystallization process is retarded with regard to the crystallization in films made without surfactants.24 Table 2. The measured masses, calculated surface densities and densities of four-layered titania films, deposited on SiO2 support sol titania mass surface density density (mg) (g/m2) (g/dm3) U 3.0 1.4 4200 R 3.6 1.8 3300 D 3.0 1.3 4300 C 5.8 2.6 2200 To observe the differences in film morphologies, AFM images were taken (Figure 2). The addition of surfactant into titania sols increases the thickness of the films (Figure 1) and also selectively influences their surface roughness. The films, deposited from sol C, have twice as high surface roughness as the films, deposited from sols U or D. Černigoj et al. Comparison of Different Characteristics of TiO2 Films and 32 Acta Chim. Slov. 2006, 53, 29–35 Results revealed also that the surface morphology of the films depends on the substrate (Figure 2, Table 3). A different morphology noted for the films deposited on glass support without the SiO2 protecting layer (Figure 2 A), indicated the influence of the glass support. This effect can be attributed to the diffusion of Na+ ions from bare glass support in the interior of the film contributing to the formation of a mixed oxide phase26 and larger anatase grains.24, 27 The effect is the most pronounced for films deposited from sol R and less for films deposited from sol U or D. It seems that there is a simultaneous effect of sodium diffusion and the surfactant on growth of the nano grains of TiO2. O 100 200 hm 0 100 200 nm C) IIÔ 200 nm Figure 2. AFM images (200 nm x 200 nm) of calcined, single-layered TiO2 films: A) sol C, sodium glass support; B) sol C, SiO2 support; C) sol D, SiO2 support Table 3. Thicknesses and surface roughnesses (calculated from AFM images) of single-layered titania films sol and support thickness (nm) RMS roughness (nm) U, SiO2 support 80 1.23 U, sodium glass support 80 0.90 R, SiO2 support 131 1.29 R, sodium glass support 150 3.62 D, SiO2 support 79 0.95 D, sodium glass support / 0.85 C, SiO2 support 228 1.87 C, sodium glass support / 2.21 Similarly, light absorption properties of titania films depend not only on the sol, used for preparation of the films, but also on the type of the substrate. Films deposited on sodium glass support obtained by the single deposition cycle absorb much less light between 300 and 400 nm than the same films, deposited on SiO2 support irrespectively of the addition of surfactant. UV spectra of films deposited from sol R are represented in Figure 3. Interestingly, the difference of the absorption becomes much lower when four-layered films are studied. Figure 3. The dependence of the support used for the preparation of TiO2 films on their UV absorption characteristics; sol R A similar set of experiments was performed also with different films deposited on SiO2 support. The absorption of light increases with the number of layers of TiO2 films regardless the use of surfactant. Figure 4 shows the results obtained with films deposited from sol with added surfactant Pluronic F-127. An increase in the number of dippings produces a red-shift of the absorption edge of the TiO2 film which involves a decrease of the band gap energies from 3.49 eV (1 layer) to 3.31 eV (5 layers). On the other hand, when comparing the films with the same number of layers the Černigoj et al. Comparison of Different Characteristics of TiO2 Films and Acta Chim. Slov. 2006, 53, 29–35 33 Figure 4. The dependence of number of layers of TiO2 on UV absorption properties of TiO2 films with added surfactant Pluronic F-127 in the sol (sol C); SiO2 support addition of Pluronic F-127 results in a higher absorption of light between 300 and 400 nm. This is true for films made by 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 dipping cycles. 2 Photocatalytic experiments Plasmocorinth B was used as a model azo compound in photocatalytic experiments. Figure 5 represents the degradation curves of the dye solution catalyzed by one-layered TiO2 films deposited on SiO2 support. The same experiments were done also with two-, three-, four- and five- layered films, deposited on SiO2 support, and with one- and four-layered films, deposited on sodium glass support. All degradation curves indicate first – order kinetics, therefore they were fitted as first order reactions regarding the decrease of absorbance at 527 nm. The mean half-times and standard deviations were calculated for each catalyst separately. Some of the results are included in Table 4. Temperature of calcination of the films was 500 °C, which is the optimal temperature for sodium glass substrate. Lower temperatures of annealing result in lower photocatalytic activity of photocatalyst since the photocatalyticaly active TiO2 crystaline phase (anatase) is not yet developed in the films at lower annealing temperatures. Higher temperature would result in melting of sodium glass support. Time of calcination was 30 minutes, which was long enough to degrade all the organic residues captured in the film. The highest photodegradation rates were achieved when the solution was purged with oxygen during the experiment. Purging with argon or no purging resulted in lower degradation rates. We compared the films deposited from the same sol on both substrates. Na+ cations from the glass substrate diffuse into the TiO2 film’s grains during the thermal treatment with an adverse effect on the photocatalytic Figure 5. The influence of addition of surfactants in sols on photodecolorisation of Plasmocorinth B solution with one-layered TiO2 films deposited on SiO2 support; insert: chemical structure of Plasmocorinth B activity.3 This was truly noticed also in our experiments. The only photocatalyticaly active single-layered titania film was the one deposited from sol with added Pluronic F-127. Its photocatalytic activity was also lower than the activity of the same film, deposited on SiO2 support (lines 7 and 8 in Table 4). Similar observations were noticed also with four-layered films. The films deposited from sols D and U (lines 10 and 14 in Table 4) were still not photocatalyticaly active. The other two films (lines 12 and 16 in Table 4) showed some activity against the photodecolorisation of Plasmocorinth B, but this again was still lower than with the same films, deposited on SiO2 support. Table 4. The calculated half-times and rate constants of pho-todecolorisation of aqueous Plasmocorinth B solutions using calcined TiO2 films (1 and 4 layers) sol number of layers support half-time -mean value (s) rate constant (s1 × 10-4 1 U 1 SiO2 6500 1.07 2 U 1 sodium glass X 0 3 R 1 SiO2 6500 1.07 4 R 1 sodium glass X 0 5 D 1 SiO2 6500 1.07 6 D 1 sodium glass X 0 7 C 1 SiO2 3700 1.87 8 C 1 sodium glass 6400 1.08 9 U 4 SiO2 2200 3.15 10 U 4 sodium glass X 0 11 R 4 SiO2 1750 3.96 12 R 4 sodium glass 2250 3.08 13 D 4 SiO2 2150 3.22 14 D 4 sodium glass X 0 15 C 4 SiO2 1150 6.03 16 C 4 sodium glass 1300 5.33 Černigoj et al. Comparison of Different Characteristics of TiO2 Films and 34 Acta Chim. Slov. 2006, 53, 29–35 By increasing the thickness of the deposited films obtained by performing multiple dipping cycles, the effect of sodium diffusion diminishes and the upper part of the TiO2 film becomes more or less free of sodium ions impurities and the films become photocatalyticaly active. Accordingly, a set of experiments was performed with different films deposited on SiO2 support. Results presented in Table 4 show that the photocatalytic activity of the films when deposited on the glass slides with the SiO2 protective layer increases with the film thickness (Figure 1) in all cases. On the other hand it is shown that when comparing different films with the same number of layers of TiO2, the addition of Pluronic F-127 has a noticeable effect on the increasing photocatalytic activity of the films when deposited on the glass slides with the SiO2 barrier film. Our photodegradation studies showed that photocatalytic activity of the films increases with the film thickness and consequently with the film’s mass irrespective of addition of surfactants into the sols (Figure 6). The relation between the thickness (the number of layers, the mass of titania film) and the degradation rate is quite linear for films, deposited from sols U, R and D. This could be simply accounted for by the increase in the number of active sites and in the amount of photons absorbed by TiO2. Another proof for this are UV-Vis spectra of the films (Figure 4). Comparison of film thicknesses and the UV-Vis spectra shows that thicker layer of TiO2 results in increased absorbance of the film in UV region. On the contrary, the rate constants of films, deposited from sol C, do not increase linearly with the number of coatings in the whole range (Figure 6). Films from sol C are thicker than films deposited from sols U and D and photogenerated holes and electrons from the bottom of the films could not reach the surface of the films, where they can react with the organic molecule. C -¦J -J 6- i- K 'p 4- /j* - -¦—solU 2- s'Ji - d- sol R ¦ ¦ a-¦ sol D s* — A--S01C 1- K3 300 600 900 1200 1500 the mass of irradiated titania (fig) 1 S(X> Figure 6. The influence of irradiated titania mass on the rate constant for the photodecolorisation of aqueous solution of Plasmocorinth B; SiO2 support Therefore the photocatalytic activity cannot correlate infinitely with the film thickness. The different masses of irradiated titania films are involved also when comparing different TiO2 films with the same number of layers and their photodegradation rates. It was calculated from degradation rates that one-layered TiO2 film deposited from sol C (surfactant Pluronic F-127) is twice more photocatalyticaly active than similar film deposited from sol D (without surfactant). The mass of the first film is 360 µg, the mass of the second is 180 µg. Higher mass means more photoactive sites and more efficient absorption of light and consequently higher number of reactive species on the surface of the film capable of reacting with azo dye. It seems from the Figure 6 that the mass of titania is the only parameter defining the final photocatalytic activity, because all deposited films have similar photocatalytic activity per unit of mass. This was not expected because it was believed that surface structure and the porosity of the film could also be involved in improving the photocatalytic activity. More work is planned in investigations of the influence of porosity on photocatalytic activities of the films (e.g. measuring the photocatalytic activities of well-ordered mesoporous titania films). Conclusions Results reveal that the surface morphology of the films depends on the surfactant used and on the substrate. Adding surfactant in the sol increases dip coating efficiency and presumably also the porosity of prepared films. Increased thickness (mass) of titania films means more efficient absorption of light and consequently higher number of reactive species of the film capable of reacting with azo dye. Additional layers of TiO2 also result in higher thickness of the films and consequently in higher photocatalytic activities of the prepared films but the photodegradation rates do not increase linearly with the number of coatings, because photogenerated holes and electrons from the bottom of the thicker films recombine before they reach the surface of the films, where they can react with the organic molecule. For the films made with surfactant the increase is linear in the broader thickness range. Sodium glass support results in a decrease of photocatalytic activities of the films because of the diffusion of sodium cations into the titania layer during the heat treatment. The negative influence of sodium cations could be observed in UV spectra of prepared films, where those films deposited on sodium glass support absorb much less UV light than the films deposited on SiO2 support. Films deposited on sodium glass show some photocatalytic activity only if they are thick enough. Černigoj et al. Comparison of Different Characteristics of TiO2 Films and Acta Chim. Slov. 2006, 53, 29–35 35 Acknowledgements This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia. Authors thank dr. Miha Čekada from Jožef Stefan Institute for the film thickness measurements, doc. dr. Gvido Bratina for helping us with AFM measurements and dr. Boris Orel from National Institute of Chemistry for discussion and revising the paper. References 1. C.-Y. Hsiao, C.-L. Lee, D.F. Ollis, J. Catal. 1983, 82, 418-423. 2. A. Mills, R.H. Davies, D. Worsley, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1993, 22: 417-425. 3. M. Kaneko, I. Okura, Photocatalysis: science and technology; Springer, 2002, pp. 18-182. 4. A.S. Topalov, D.V. Šojić, D.A. Molnar-Gabor, B.F. Abramović, M.I. Čomor, Appl. Catal. B 2004, 54, 125-133. 5. M. Stylidi, I. Kondarides, X. E. Verykios, Appl. Catal. B, 2002, 1252, 1-16. 6. V. Augugliaro, C. Baiocchi, A. Bianco Prevot, E. GarciaLopez, V. Loddo, S. Malato, G. Marci, L. Palmisano, M. Pazzi, E. Pramauro, Chemosphere 2002, 49, 1223-1230. 7. N.J. Peill, L. Bourne, M.R. Hoffmann, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem., 1997, 108, 221-228. 8. D.D. Dionysios, M.T. Suidan, I. Baudin, J.-M. Laine, Appl. Catal. B 2004, 50, 259-269. 9. A.K. Ray, A.A.C.M. Beenackers, Catal. Today, 1998, 40, 73-83. 10. C. Guillard, B. Beaugiraud, C. Dutriez, J.M. Herrmann, H. Jaffrezic, N. Jaffrezic-Renault, M. Lacroix, Appl. Catal. B, 2002, 39, 331-342. 11. C. H. Kwon, H. Shin, J.H. Kim, W.S. Choi, K.H. Yoon, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2004, 86, 78-82. 12. J. Yu, X. Zhao, Mater. Res. Bull., 2001, 36, 97-107. 13. J.C. Yu, H.Y. Tang, J. Yu, H.C. Chan, L. Zhang, Y. Xie, H. Wang, S.P. Wong, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem., 2002, 153, 211-219. 14. Y.U. Ahn, E.J. Kim, H.T. Kim, S.H. Hahn, Mater. Lett., 2003, 57, 4660-4666. 15. M. Keshmiri, M. Mohseni, T. Troczynski, Appl. Catal. B 2004, 53, 209-219. 16. E. Stathatos, P. Lianos, C. Tsakiroglou, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 2004, 75, 255-260. 17. C. Guillard, D. Debayle, A. Gagnaire, H. Jaffrezic, J.-M. Herrmann, Mater. Res. Bull., 2004, 39, 1445-1458. 18. P. Bouras, E. Stathatos, P. Lianos, C. Tsakiroglou, Appl. Catal. B, 2004, 51, 275-281. 19. D. Li, Y. Guo, C. Hu, C. Jiang, E. Wang, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2004, 207, 183-193. 20. I. M. Arabatzis, T. Stergiopoulos, D. Andreeva, S. Kitova, S.G. Neophytides, P. Falaras, J. Catal., 2003, 220, 127-135. 21. C. Baiocchi, M.C. Brussino, E. Pramauro, A. Bianco Prevot, L. Palmisano, G. Marci, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 2002, 214, 247-256. 22. M. Karkmaz, E. Puzenat, C. Guillard, J. M. Herrmann, Appl. Catal. B, 2004, 51, 183-194. 23. U. Lavrenčič Štangar, B. Orel, A. Régis, Ph. Colomban, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol., 1997, 8, 965-971. 24. U. Černigoj, U. Lavrenčič Štangar, P. Trebše, U. Opara Kraševec, S. Gross, Thin Solid Films, 2006, 495, 327 – 332. 25. M. Sreemany, S. Sen, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2004, 83, 169-177. 26. H. Schroederm in : Physics of Thin Film, Vol. 5; Academic Press, New York, 1969, pp. 87-88. 27. H.-J. Nam, T. Amemiya, M. Murabayashi, K. Itoh, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2004, 108, 8254-8259. Povzetek TiO2 je znan fotokatalizator, ki ga pogosto uporabljamo pri oksidativni mineralizaciji organskih onesnaževal. Namen naše raziskave je bila primerjava med različnimi lastnostmi pripravljenih TiO2 filmov in njihovimi fotokatalitskimi aktivnostmi. TiO2 filme smo nanašali na dve različni podlagi s pomočjo sol-gel tehnike. Merili smo debeline in mase tako pripravljenih žganih filmov. Površine filmov smo okarakterizirali z mikroskopom na atomsko silo. Uporaba surfaktanta in vrsta podlage vplivata na morfologijo in na UV absorpcijske lastnosti filmov. Dodatek surfaktanta v sol vpliva tudi na povečano debelino žganih filmov. V tipičnem fotokatalitskem eksperimentu smo obsevali TiO2 film v prisotnosti vodne raztopine Plazmokorinta B. Natrijevo steklo kot substrat zmanjša fotokatalitsko aktivnost filmov v primerjavi s SiO2. Fotokatalitska aktivnost vseh filmov raste s številom plasti TiO2, ko pa smo primerjali različne filme z enakim številom plasti, smo ugotovili, da dodatek Pluronic F-127 v solu pozitivno vpliva na fotokatalitsko aktivnost. Z uporabo surfaktanta dobimo debelejše in težje filme, kar posledično pomeni večjo učinkovitost absorpcije UVA svetlobe. Černigoj et al. Comparison of Different Characteristics of TiO2 Films and