Original scientific article UDC 597.317:591.4(262) Received: 2010-11-08 MORPHOLOGICAL ABNORMALITIES IN TWO BATOID SPECIES (CHONDRICHTHYES) FROM NORTHERN TUNISIAN WATERS (CENTRAL MEDITERRANEAN) Néjia MNASRI, Olfa EL KAMEL, & Moncef BOUMAÏZA Laboratoire d'Hydrobiologie Littorale et Limnique, Université du 07 novembre à Carthage, Faculté des Sciences, Zarzouna, 7021 Bizerte, Tunisia E-mail: nejiamnasri@yahoo.com Mohamed Mourad BEN AMOR Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer, port de pêche, 2025 La Goulette, Tunisia Christian REYNAUD & Christian CAPAPÉ Laboratoire interdisciplinaire de Recherche sur la Didactique, l'Education et la Formation, E. A. 3749, case 77, Université Montpellier II, Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc, 34095 Montpellier cedex 5, France ABSTRACT The authors present two cases of abnormalities recorded in two elasmobranch species from northern Tunisian waters. A pregnant common torpedo Torpedo torpedo captured in the Lagoon of Bizerte in northern Tunisia, carried three embryos, two of which, one female and one male, were abnormal, both having the pectoral fin non-adherent to the head. A juvenile female Raja polystigma captured off northern coast of Tunisia presented a morphological abnormality at distal end of tail in the shape of a fork. These two cases of abnormalities are described, commented and discussed. Key words: Chondrichthyes, Torpedo torpedo, Raja polystigma, morphological abnormalities, Lagoon of Bizerte, central Mediterranean ANOMALIE MORFOLOGICHE IN DUE SPECIE BATOIDI (CHONDRICHTHYES) Dl ACQUE SETTENTRIONALI DELLA TUNISIA (MEDITERRANEO CENTRALE) SINTESI Gli autori presentano due casi di anomalie riscontrate in due specie di elasmobranchi di acque settentrionali della Tunisia. Una femmina gravida di torpedine ocellata Torpedo torpedo, catturata nella Laguna di Biserta (Tunisia settentrionale), portava tre embrioni dei quali due, una femmina ed un maschio, presentavano anomalie, ossia la pinna pettorale non aderente alla testa. Una giovane femmina di Raja polystigma catturata al largo della costa settentrionale della Tunisia presentava un'anomalia morfologica all'estremita distale della coda, ossia una forca. Nell'articolo questi due casi di anomalie vengono descritti, commentati e discussi. Parole chiave: Chondrichthyes, Torpedo torpedo, Raja polystigma, anomalie morfologiche, Laguna di Biserta, Mediterraneo centrale INTRODUCTION Morphological abnormalities also called 'monstrosities' by authors were reported in fish species and listed by Dawson (1964, 1966, 1971) and Dawson & Heal (1971). It appears that such phenomena are more frequently recorded in osteichthyan species than in chon-drichthyan species. It is probably due to the low commercial value that has characterized the latter for several years and difficulties to obtain a significant number of specimens to detect abnormalities (Hoenig & Walsh, 1983; Ribeiro-Prado et a!., 2008). Additionally, they represent a minor group in term of captures, 0.85% of total world captures (Vannucini, 1988). Morphological abnormalities were listed in sharks (Barrull et a!., 2002; Saidi et a!., 2005; Mancini et a!., 2006), but also in skates and rays (Ribeiro-Prado et a!., 2008; El Kamel et a!., 2009a), for both embryos and free-swimming specimens. Morphological abnormalities concern skeleton, chondrodranium and vertebral column in the former, while in the latter they concern fins, mainly pectoral fins. Investigations conducted from early 2006 to date in northern Tunisian waters to establish elasmo-branch monitoring in the area allowed the capture of a pregnant female of the common torpedo Torpedo torpedo Linnaeus, 1758 carrying abnormal embryos, and an abnormal female of the speckled ray Raja po!ystigma Regan, 1923. Both specimens are described in the present paper, together with comments and a discussion on morphological abnormalities reported in batoid species. MATERIAL AND METHODS Investigations were conducted from June 2006 to October 2010 in northern Tunisian waters, including the northern Tunisian coast from Algerian border (8"37' E) to Kelibia (11 "03' E), and the Lagoon of Bizerte (Fig. 1). The latter is a brackish water area located in northeastern Tunisia, between 37"8' and 37"14' N, and between 9"46' and 9"56' E (Fig. 2), where elasmobranch species are regularly caught by gill-nets, longlines or trammel nets (El Kamel et a!., 2009b, c). Fig. 1: Map of the Mediterranean showing the Lagoon of Bizerte, the sampling area (SA) off northern Tunisian coast and pointing out the capture site (black star) of the abnormal Raja polystigma (FSB-Raj-pol-01). Sl. 1: Zemljevid Sredozemlja z Laguno Bizerte, območjem vzorčenja (SA) ob severni tunizijski obali in označeno točko ulova (črna zvezda) abnormalnega primerka vrste Raja polystigma (FSB-Raj-pol-01). Fig. 2: Map of the Lagoon of Bizerte showing the capture site (black star) of the pregnant common torpedo, Torpedo torpedo, (FSB T-torp.04). Sl. 2: Zemljevid Lagune Bizerte z označeno točko ulova (črna zvezda) breje samice navadnega električnega ska-ta, Torpedo torpedo, (FSB T-torp.04). Soon after captures and identification, both specimens were photographed and measured. Morphometric measurements were recorded to the nearest millimetre following Mejri et al. (2004) and masses to the nearest decigram. They were preserved in 5% buffered formalin, deposited in the Ichtyological Collection of the Faculté des Sciences de Bizerte and received catalogue number. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Torpedo torpedo Torpedo torpedo is known off the eastern Atlantic from the Bay of Biscaye (Quéro et al., 2003) to the Gulf of Guinea (Blache et al., 1970), and southward to South African waters (Smith & Heemstra, 1986). T. torpedo is reported throughout the Mediterranean Sea, but it is more common in southern areas (Capapé, 1989). The species is reported off the Tunisian coast (Bradaï et al., 2004), but it was also recorded in Tunisian brackish areas such as the Bahiret El Biban (Capapé et al., 2004), Tunis Southern Lagoon (Mejri et al., 2004) and the Lagoon of Bizerte where a sustainable population has probably found favourable environmental conditions to develop and reproduce (El Kamel et al., 2009b, c). On 21 July 2010, a female T. torpedo was captured by commercial gill-nets at 1.5-2.5 m, on sandy-muddy bottom in the Lagoon of Bizerte, at 37"12'23" N and 9"56'86" E. It was 275 mm in total length and weighed 361.8 g in total mass, while the eviscerated body mass reached 313.4 g. The female was dissected soon after its capture and the uteri contained 3 embryos which were removed and analysed; two of them presented morphological abnormalities, one was normal. The pregnant female was referenced FSB T-torp.04, while the 3 embryos FSB T-torp.05, FSB T-torp.06 and FSB T-torp.07. Morphometric measurements were carried out in the 4 specimens and are presented in Table 1. The first abnormal embryo (FSB T-torp.05) was a male having 70 mm in total length and weighting 4.69 g. The left pectoral fin was non-adherent to the head and a large region of the fin was missing. The pectoral fin was constituted by a short curve ending by a distal point. Additionally, a large region of the left pelvic fin was also missing and less developed that the right pelvic fin (Fig. 3). The second abnormal embryo (FSB T-torp.06) was a female smaller than the abnormal male; its total length was 52.16 mm and it weighed 1.96 g. The right pectoral fin of this embryo presented a slight non-adherence to the head while the right pelvic fin was not completely formed and smaller than the left pectoral fin (Fig. 4). Fig. 3: Abnormal embryo (FSB T-torp.05), removed from a pregnant female T. torpedo, scale bar = 20 mm. Sl. 3: Abnormalni zarodek (FSB T-torp.05), odstranjen iz breje samice vrste T. torpedo, merilo = 20 mm. Fig. 4: A. Abnormal embryo (FSB T-torp.06), removed from a pregnant female T. torpedo scale bar= 10 mm. B. Insert showing the pectoral non-adherent to the head, scale bar = 2 mm. Sl. 4: A. Abnormalni zarodek (FSB T-torp.06), odstranjen iz breje samice vrste T. torpedo, merilo = 10 mm. B. Izsek prikazuje prsno plavut, ki se ne stika z glavo, merilo = 2 mm. Tab. 1: Morphometric measurements and meristic counts recorded in the pregnant common torpedo (FSB T-torp.04), and its uterine content: two abnormal embryos (FSB T-torp.05 and FSB T-torp.06) and a normal embryo (FSB T-torp.07). Tab. 1: Morfometrični in meristični podatki za brejo samico navadnega električnega skata (FSB T-torp.04) in tri zarodke: dva abnormalna (FSB T-torp.05 and FSB T-torp.06) in en normalen zarodek (FSB T-torp.07). Reference FSB T-torp.04 FSB T-torp.05 FSB T-torp.06 FSB T-torp.07 Sex F M F F Total mass (g) 361.80 4.69 1.96 5.07 Measurements mm % TL mm % TL mm % TL mm % TL Total length (TL) 275.00 70.76 52.16 68.58 Disc length 140.00 50.91 36.72 51.89 25.42 48.73 32.39 47.23 Disc width 175.00 63.64 39.35 55.61 28.76 55.14 39.31 57.32 Disc depth 22.98 8.36 5.43 7.67 4.58 8.78 5.14 7.49 Eyeball length 7.65 2.78 3.24 4.58 2.36 4.52 3.00 4.37 Cornea 3.98 1.45 2.09 2.95 1.72 3.30 1.67 2.44 Pre-orbital length 20.52 7.46 5.64 7.97 4.44 8.51 5.89 8.59 Inter-orbital width 11.90 4.33 5.49 7.76 2.47 4.74 3.10 4.52 Nasal curtain 15.58 5.67 3.95 5.58 4.36 8.36 5.05 7.36 Spiracle diameter 5.92 2.15 2.29 3.24 1.39 2.66 1.53 2.23 Inter-nasal width 12.89 4.69 3.56 5.03 3.58 6.86 3.68 5.37 Space between eye and spiracle 7.36 2.68 2.30 3.25 1.92 3.68 1.11 1.62 Inter-spiracular width 13.93 5.07 6.91 9.77 4.72 9.05 4.99 7.28 Pre-oral length 24.73 8.99 7.95 11.24 3.51 6.73 6.17 9.00 Mouth width 17.03 6.19 5.07 7.17 4.23 8.11 4.56 6.65 First gill slit 5.99 2.18 1.27 1.79 1.14 2.19 1.52 2.22 Second gill slit 6.45 2.35 1.56 2.20 1.45 2.78 1.52 2.22 Third gill slit 7.14 2.60 2.01 2.84 1.90 3.64 1.83 2.67 Fourth gill slit 7.38 2.68 1.82 2.57 0.45 0.86 1.90 2.77 Fifth gill slit 4.81 1.75 1.03 1.46 1.52 2.91 0.98 1.43 Width between first gill slit 41.74 15.18 11.35 16.04 5.31 10.18 9.39 13.69 Width between first gill slit 36.98 13.45 10.16 14.36 4.49 8.61 9.58 13.97 Snout tip to eye 21.59 7.85 7.05 9.96 5.67 10.87 7.21 10.51 Snout tip to mouth 26.83 9.76 8.11 11.46 5.44 10.43 7.02 10.24 Snout tip to first gill slit 59.18 21.52 12.94 18.29 7.22 13.84 10.07 14.68 Snout tip to fifth gill slit 83.22 30.26 18.84 26.63 16.37 31.38 17.48 25.49 Snout tip pelvic fin 143.00 52.00 36.91 52.16 24.66 47.28 32.03 46.70 Snout tip to vent 162.00 58.91 38.86 54.92 27.38 52.49 37.15 54.17 Pectoral fin anterior margin 70.28 25.56 25.04 35.39 16.52 31.67 16.81 24.51 Pectoral fin posterior margin 91.53 33.28 17.77 25.11 15.52 29.75 18.91 27.57 Pectoral fin inner margin 11.24 4.09 2.03 2.87 3.25 6.23 1.70 2.48 Pelvic fin anterior margin 36.15 13.15 10.14 14.33 5.60 10.74 6.79 9.90 Pelvic fin posterior margin 54.55 19.84 10.77 15.22 7.07 13.55 12.51 18.24 Pelvic fin inner margin 10.69 3.89 3.13 4.42 2.21 4.24 2.39 3.48 Span of pelvic fins 85.67 31.15 19.03 26.89 13.88 26.61 17.47 25.47 Tail base width 25.57 9.30 7.15 10.10 4.26 8.17 6.02 8.78 Tail base depth 15.26 5.55 3.25 4.59 2.27 4.35 3.47 5.06 Tail length 101.35 36.85 24.87 35.15 19.68 37.73 24.82 36.19 Snout tip to first dorsal 178.00 64.73 43.65 61.69 29.37 56.31 41.50 60.51 Snout tip to second dorsal 215.00 78.18 52.34 73.97 34.66 66.45 49.31 71.90 Snout tip to birth of dorsal ca udal 245.00 89.09 60.53 85.54 43.13 82.69 55.12 80.37 Snout tip to birth of ventral ca udal 240.00 87.27 59.41 83.96 42.31 81.12 55.48 80.90 Caudal superior 44.58 16.21 12.68 17.92 7.20 13.80 12.98 18.93 Caudal inferior edge 37.03 13.47 11.63 16.44 7.43 14.24 8.69 12.67 Caudal posterior edge 47.48 17.27 10.55 14.91 5.96 11.43 9.52 13.88 First dorsal anterior edge 35.57 12.93 6.78 9.58 2.98 5.71 3.20 4.67 First dorsal posterior edge 23.33 8.48 4.40 6.22 3.36 6.44 4.82 7.03 First dorsal inner edge 6.59 2.40 4.31 6.09 2.28 4.37 2.77 4.04 First dorsal base 18.80 6.84 4.17 5.89 3.93 7.53 4.00 5.83 Second dorsal anterior edge 25.14 9.14 4.20 5.94 42.87 82.19 3.93 5.73 Second dorsal posterior edge 16.40 5.96 4.00 5.65 2.78 5.33 3.40 4.96 Second dorsal inner edge 5.87 2.13 2.73 3.86 2.12 4.06 2.25 3.28 Second base 12.76 4.64 3.84 5.43 3.06 5.87 3.53 5.15 Inter-dorsal distance 14.60 5.31 3.60 5.09 2.69 5.16 3.95 5.76 Second dorsal to caudal birth 13.65 4.96 3.64 5.14 3.13 6.00 4.20 6.12 Caudal careen 40.48 14.72 11.36 16.05 7.48 14.34 11.83 17.25 Clasper length - 5.82 8.22 - - Tab. 2: Morphological abnormalities recorded in the ichthyological literature in specimens of the genus Torpedo. Tab. 2: Morfološke nepravilnosti, zabeležene v ihtiološki literaturi pri primerkih iz rodu Torpedo. Species Case of abnormality Marine region Authors T. marmorata Pectoral non adherent to the head Adriatic Sea Valle (1931) T. marmorata Pectoral non adherent to the head Adriatic Sea Jardas & Homen (1977) T. nobiliana Pectoral non adherent to the head Atlantic Ocean Palmer & Wheeler (1958) T. torpedo Surnumerary dorsal fin Lagoon of Bizerte Ben Brahim & Capape (1997) T. torpedo Lack of gill-slit Lagoon of Bizerte El Kamel et a/. (2009a) T. torpedo Pectoral non adherent to the head Lagoon of Bizerte This study T. torpedo Pectoral non adherent to the head Lagoon of Bizerte This study The atypical morphological characteristics observed in the embryos carried by the pregnant female T. torpedo were pectoral fins non-adherent to the head, rarely recorded in torpedinid species (Ribeiro-Prado et a/., 2008). Three cases were recorded to date in free swimming specimens (Tab. 2), two for the marbled electric ray Torpedo marmorata Risso, 1810 and a single case for the black torpedo Torpedo nobi/iana Bonaparte, 1835. Consequently, such abnormality was reported herein for the first time in the common torpedo. However, it was found in developing embryos; the question is whether their development would complete and if they would be able to live in the wild after birth. It could explain why no free swimming common torpedos presenting similar abnormality were found to date. In contrast Ribeiro-Prado et a/. (2008) listed 24 similar cases in rajid species and 11 cases in stingrays. This relatively frequent occurrence of abnormalities in this species rather than in torpedinids appears difficult to explain. It may be due to sampling, but also to disk shape, rectangular in skates and rays, rounded in torpedos; it could mean that it is more difficult for pectoral fins to develop adherent to the head in the former than in the latter. According to Bigelow & Schroeder (1953), such morphological abnormality occurs when the pectoral fins fail to fuse together in front of the head in early development. Additionally, Thorson et a/. (1983) described embryonic development in the two freshwater stingrays Potamotrygon conste//ata (Vaillant, 1880) and P. motoro (Müller & Henle, 1841) as follows: in early embryos, the stingray's pectoral fins begin to separate, then fuse in medium embryos and finally form the complete disc in near term embryos. Three common torpedos presenting abnormalities were reported from the Lagoon of Bizerte (see Table 2, Ben Brahim & Capape, 1997; Ben Brahim et a/., 1998). This relatively high frequency could be explained by the pollution, affecting a restricted brackish area such as the Lagoon of Bizerte, polluted by both inorganic and organic nutriments and heavy metals. The common torpedo lives buried in sandy bottoms (El Kamel et a/., 2009a, b, c), where pollutants are collected (Mzoughi et a/., 2002; Harzallah, 2003). However, this hypothesis needs further confirmation. Raja polystigma The speckled ray Raja polystigma Regan, 1923 is probably endemic to the Mediterranean Sea (Capape, 1989), and up to date, unknown off the eastern side of the Atlantic (Quero et a!., 2003). The species was reported in northern Mediterranean areas, such as the Catalan Sea (Matallanas, 1977), southern France (Capape et a!., 2006a, b), the Italian Seas (Tortonese, 1956; Arbocco, 1966), off Greece (Kaspiris, 1974). Southward, R. polystigma is known off the Maghreb shore, Morocco (Lloris & Rucabado, 1998), Algeria (Hemida et a!., 2007), Tunisia, where the species is rather common in northern areas (Capape et a!., 1980; BradaT et a!., 2004). On 25 May 2010, a speckled ray was captured off northern coast of Tunisia by trawler (37"31'9.36" N; 9"51'26.71" E), at depth between cca. 150 and 200 m, on sandy-muddy bottom (Fig. 5). The specimen of R. po!ystigma was identified following Clark (1926), Tortonese (1956) and Capape et a!. (1980, 2006b), as follows: disc sub-quadrangular, obtuse in front, with snout rounded, anterior margin slightly concave at level of eyes and outer corners; outer angles broadly rounded; posterior margins convex; first dorsal larger than second dorsal. Disc depth 11%, disc length 77.8%, pre-oral length 15.9%, pelvic span 37%, pelvic fin anterior margin all in disc width (DW). Dorsal surface greyish-brownish with dark and yellowish spots, belly beige with the outer margin of disc slightly brownish. Additional morphological measurements and meristic counts (see Table 3) are in agreement with those reported by these authors. The specimen was 374 mm DW, 541 mm total length, the total body mass and the eviscerated body mass were 1104.3 g and 921 g, respectively, while the liver mass was 38.7 g. The gonads were thread-like and both weighed 5.2 g, the oviducal glands were inconspicuously developed and both weighed 0.94 g. The specimen was still juvenile, in agreement with Capape & Quignard (1978) who noted that females over 400 mm DW were mature. The gut was empty, with no food or remains of food. Fig. 5: Abnormal R. polystigma caught off northern Tunisian coast, scale bar = 50 mm. Sl. 5: Abnormalni primerek vrste R. polystigma, ujet ob severni tunizijski obali, merilo = 50 mm. However, the specimen presented a morphological abnormality at distal end of tail in the shape of a fork (Fig. 6). This morphological abnormality in tail is not due to an injury as it is generally the case in skates (see Mnasri et al., 2009). No scar was visible in this fork which is also covered by pigmented skin. To our knowledge, it is the first time that such abnormality was re- A Fig. 6: Tail of abnormal R. polystigma with black arrow pointing out the morphological abnormality or fork, scale bar = 10 mm. (A) Dorsal surface, (B) ventral surface. Sl. 6: Rep abnormalnega primerka vrste R. polystigma s črno puščico, ki kaže na morfološko deformacijo v obliki škarjastega repa, merilo = 10 mm. (A) Hrbtna stran, (B) trebušna stran. corded to date in skates. Ribeiro-Prado et al. (2008) listed all morphological abnormalities recorded to date in skates and rays, and noted that abnormalities occurred in disc, with pectoral fins non-adherent to the head being the most recorded one. The latter not only concerned skates but also rays and rarely torpedinids. A single case of abnormality reported to date was in a rough ray Raja radula Delaroche, 1809 by Capape & Pantoustier (1975). Another case of morphological abnormality in tail was observed in a common torpedo T. torpedo in Tunisian waters, the specimen exhibiting a surnumerary dorsal fin (Ben Brahim & Capape, 1997). Literature review shows that cases of abnormalities are relatively rare in elasmobranch species (see Dawson, 1964, 1966, 1971; Dawson & Heal, 1971; Hoenig & Walsh, 1983; Ribeiro-Prado et al., 2008). However, the percentage of abnormalities recorded is not representative of the real number of cases, because all specimens came from fisheries. So, in order to obtain a more accurate percentage, samples from scientific surveys should be considered. The causes of such abnormalities remain doubtful and still hypothetical. Unfavourable environmental conditions, such as large exposures to pollutants for instance, probably play a role in occurrence of abnormalities (Ribeiro-Prado et al., 2008). It could explain why abnormalities are more often observed in oviparous species than in viviparous species; in the former, embryos develop in egg cases directly deposited in water, while in the latter embryos are protected in the mother's uteri (Casarini et al., 1996). However, we cannot totally exclude the role of the polluted environment in abnormalities observed in viviparous elasmobranch species. Some instances were reported herein concerning the common torpedo from the Lagoon of Bizerte. Bensam (1965) noted that embryonic deformities could be caused by intrauterine pressure exerted by other embryos in a same litter. In contrast, Bonfil (1989) argues that in a litter, embryos are exposed to the same space and growth conditions, so the origin of pre-natal abnormalities would be related to mutation or other developmental irregularities. Rosa et al. (1996) noted that abnormalities could be due to disturbance in the initial stages of ontogeny known as shark stage, where embryos have fins separated from the head, resembling shark embryos. According to Rosa et al. (1996) the fact that adult skates exhibiting abnormalities occur alive and in good condition, means that these deformities do not interfere with the biological activities, mainly feeding. Additionally, an interesting instance was described by Oldfield (2005) of a female ocellated freshwater stingray P. mo-toro placed in captivity, which gave birth to a couple of abnormal specimens. Oldfield (2005) noted that the first specimen died two days after birth, while the second specimen born as a 'Batman ray' did fantastic, eating Tab. 3: Morphometric measurements and meristic counts recorded in the abnormal Raja polystigma (FSB-Raj-pol-01). Tab. 3: Morfometrični in meristični podatki za abnormalnem primerek vrste Raja polystigma (FSB-Raj-pol-01). Reference FSB-Raj-pol-01 Morphometric measurments mm % DW Total length 541 144.6 Disc length 291 77.8 Disc width (DW) 374 Disc depth 41.4 11.1 Eyeball length 18.2 4.9 Cornea 13.1 3.5 Pre-orbital length 59.1 15.8 Inter-orbital width 24.5 6.6 Spiracle length 14.7 3.9 Spiracle width 6.15 1.6 Inter-nasal width 37.2 9.9 Nasal curtain 47.9 12.8 Interspiracular width 35.4 9.5 Pre-oral length 59.6 15.9 Mouth width 47.9 12.8 First gill slit 14.1 3.8 Second gill slit 14.5 3.9 Third gill slit 13.6 3.6 Forth gill slit 13.6 3.7 Fifth gill slit 8.5 2.3 Width between first gill slit 76.5 20.4 Width between fifth gill slit 38.9 10.4 Snout tip to eye 71.3 19.1 Snout tip to mouth 66.1 17.7 Snout tip to first gill slit 103 27.5 Snout tip to fifth gill slit 146 39.1 Snout tip to pelvic fin 230 61.5 Snout tip to vent 254 67.9 Pectora fin anterior margin 250 66.8 Pectoral fin posterior margin 195 52.1 Pectoral fin inner margin 37.9 10.2 Pelvic fin anterior margin 57.3 15.3 Pelvic fin posterior margin 84.6 22.6 Pelvic fin inner margin 31.7 8.5 Span of pelvic fin 142 37.97 Tail base width 28.7 7.6 Tail base depth 17.4 4.7 Tail length 255 68.2 Snout tip to first dorsal 472 126.2 Snout tip to second dorsal 510 136.4 Superior caudal edge 8.8 2.4 Inferior caudal edge 5.9 1.6 First dorsal anterior edge 26 6.9 First dorsal posterior edge 11.8 3.1 First dorsal base 27.9 7.5 Second dorsal anterior edge 25.7 6.8 Second dorsal posterior edge 13.8 3.7 Second dorsal base 25.6 6.8 Inter-dorsal distance d1-d2 9.1 2.4 Third dorsal anterior edge 7.8 2.1 Third dorsal posterior edge 2.1 0.6 Third dorsal base 5.1 1.4 Inter-dorsal distance d2-d3 3.9 1.1 Third dorsal caudal birth 0.8 0.2 Tooth rows upper jaw 54 Tooth rows lower jaw 57 Pseudo-branchial lamellae 16/16 Nictitating lamellae 13/13 Pectoral rays 75/75 Truncal vertebrae 28 healthily, growing rapidly, and developing a nice colour pattern. These observations confirm that such morphological abnormalities do not necessarily play a negative role in embryonic development and beyond, during life in the wild of specimens having the pectoral fin non-adherent to the head. MORFOLOŠKE NEPRAVILNOSTI PRI DVEH VRSTAH SKATOV (CHONDRICHTHYES) IZ SEVERNIH TUNIZIJSKIH VODA (OSREDNJE SREDOZEMLJE) Néjia MNASRI, Olfa EL KAMEL, & Moncef BOUMAÏZA Laboratoire d'Hydrobiologie Littorale et Limnique, Université du 07 novembre à Carthage, Faculté des Sciences, Zarzouna, 7021 Bizerte, Tunisia E-mail: nejiamnasri@yahoo.com Mohamed Mourad BEN AMOR Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer, port de pêche, 2025 La Goulette, Tunisia Christian REYNAUD & Christian CAPAPÉ Laboratoire interdisciplinaire de Recherche sur la Didactique, l'Education et la Formation, E. A. 3749, case 77, Université Montpellier II, Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc, 34095 Montpellier cedex 5, France POVZETEK Avtorji članka predstavljajo dva primera nepravilnosti, zabeležena pri dveh vrstah skatov iz severnih tunizijskih voda. Breja samica navadnega električnega skata Torpedo torpedo, ujeta v Laguni Bizerte v severni Tuniziji, je nosila tri zarodke, od katerih sta bila dva, en ženski in en moški, abnormalna, s prsno plavutjo, ki se ni stikala z glavo. Mladostna samica vrste Raja polystigma, ujeta ob severni tunizijski obali, pa je imela abnormalen rep škarjaste oblike. Primera nepravilnosti sta opisana, komentirana in diskutirana. Ključne besede: Chondrichthyes, Torpedo torpedo, Raja polystigma, morfološke abnormalnosti, Laguna Bizerte, osrednje Sredozemlje REFERENCES Arbocco, G. (1966): Primo riperto di Raja polystigma Reg. nel Golfo di Genova. Doriana, 3(116), 1-6. Barrull, J. L. M., I. Mate & M. Bueno (2002): Presence of atypical characteristics in a specimen of small-spoted catshark Scyliorhinus canicula (Linnaeus, 1758) caught in the Mediterranean. Annales, Ser. Hist. Nat., 12(1), 23-26. Ben Brahim, R. & C. Capapé (1997): Nageoire dorsale supplémentaire chez une torpille ocellée, Torpedo (Torpedo) torpedo des eaux tunisiennes (Méditerranée Centrale). Cybium, 21(2), 223-225. Ben Brahim, R., A. A. Seek & C. Capapé (1998): Albinisme chez la torpille ocellée, Torpedo (Torpedo) torpedo (Linnaeus, 1758). Cybium, 22(1 ), 83-86. Bensam, P. (1965): On a freak embryo of the grey shark Carcharhinus limbatus M. & H. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. India, 7(1), 206-207. Bigelow, H. B. & W. C. Schroeder (1953): Fishes of the western north Atlantic. Part 2. Sawfishes, guitarfishes, skates, rays and chimaeroids. Mem. Sears Found. Mar. Res., No. 1, part 2, pp. 1-577. Blache, J., J. Cadenat & J. Stauch (1970): Clés de détermination des poissons de mer signalés dans l'Atlantique oriental tropical (entre le 20ème parallèle N. et le 15ème parallèle S.). Faune. Trop., ORSTOM, 18, 1-479. Bonfil, R. (1989): An abnormal embryo of the reef shark Carcharhinus perezi (Poey) from Yucatan, Mexico. Northeast Gulf Sci., 10(2), 153-155. Bradaï, M. N., J.-P. Quignard, A. Bouaïn, O. Jarboui, A. Ouannes-Ghorbel, L. Ben Abdallah, J. Zaouali & S. Ben Salem (2004): Ichtyofaune autochtone et exotique des côtes tunisiennes: recensement et biogéographie. Cybium, 28(4), 315-328. Capapé, C. (1989): Les Sélaciens des côtes méditerranéennes: aspects généraux de leur écologie et exemples de peuplements. Océanis, 15, 309-331. Capapé, C. & G. Pantoustier (1975): Anomalies chez quelques Sélaciens des côtes tunisiennes. Arch. Inst. Pasteur Tunis., 52(3), 251-260. Capapé, C. & J.-P. Quignard (1978): Contribution à la biologie des Rajidœ des côtes tunisiennes. XIV. Raja polystigma Regan, 1923: répartition géographique et bathymétrique, sexualité, reproduction, fécondité. Cah. Biol. Mar., 19, 233-244. Capapé, C., J.-P. Quignard. & F. Kartas (1980): Nouvelle descripition de Raja polystigma Regan, 1923 (Pisces, Rajiformes). Bull. Off. natn Pêch Tunis., 4(1), 2745. Capapé, C., O. Guélorget, J.-P. Quignard, A. El Abed, J. Zaouali & J. Ben Souissi (2004): The Elasmobranch species from the Bahiret El Biban (Southern Tunisia, Central Mediterranean): a survey. Annales, Ser. Hist. Nat., 14(1), 19-28. Capapé, C., O. Guélorget, Y. Vergne & J.-P. Quignard (2006a): On a rare skate, the speckled ray, Raja polystigma Regan, 1923 (Chondrichthyes: Rajidae) captured off the coast of Languedoc (Southern France, Northern Mediterranean). Annales, Ser. Hist. Nat., 16(1), 37-42. Capapé, C., O. Guélorget, Y. Vergne, A. Marques & J.-P. Quignard (2006b): Skates and rays (Chondrichthyes) from waters off the Languedocian coast (southern France, northern Mediterranean). Annales, Ser. Hist. Nat., 16(2), 166-178. Casarini, L. M., U. L. Gomes & O. B. G. Gadig (1996): Would be Santos habour dredged material dumping a reason of teratogeny on Raja agassizi. In: Congresso Latino-Americano sobre Ciências do Mar Colacmar. Clark, R. S. (1926): Rays and Skates, a revision of the european species. Fish., Scotl., Scient. Invest., 1, 1-66. Dawson, C. (1964): A bibliography of anomalies of fishes. Gulf Res. Rep., 1, 308-399. Dawson, C. (1966): A bibliography of anomalies of fishes. Gulf Res. Rep., 2, 169-176. Dawson, C. (1971): A bibliography of anomalies of fishes. Gulf Res. Rep., 3, 215-239. Dawson, C. & E. Heal (1971): A bibliography of anomalies of fishes. Gulf Res. Rep., 3 (suppl.), 215-239. El Kamel, O., N. Mnasri, M. Boumaïza & C. Capapé (2009a): Atypical abnormality in a common torpedo, Torpedo torpedo (Chondrichthyes: Torpedinidae) from the Lagoon of Bizerte (northern Tunisia, central Mediterranean). Cah. Biol. Mar., 50(1 ), 97-101. El Kamel, O., N. Mnasri, J. Ben Souissi, M. Boumaïza, M. M. Ben Amor & C. Capapé (2009b): Inventory of elasmobranch species caught in the Lagoon of Bizerte (north-eastern Tunisia, central Mediterranean). Panam JAS, 4(4), 383-412. El Kamel, O., N. Mnasri, J. Ben Souissi, M. Boumaïza, M. M. Ben Amor & C. Capapé (2009c): Production of elasmobranch species in the Lagoon of Bizerte (northern Tunisia, central Mediterranean). Elasmovisor, 4, 8-11. Harzallah, A. (2003): Transports de polluants dans la lagune de Bizerte simulé par un modèle de circulation de l'eau. Bull. Inst. Natl. Sci. Tech. Oceanogr. Peche Salammbo, 30, 121-133. Hemida, F., W. Sergoua & R. Seridji (2007): Analyse des données morphométriques de quelques espèces du genre Raja Linnaeus, 1758, dans le bassin algérien. Rapp. P. V. Réun. Comm. Int. Explor. Scient. Mer Médit., 38, pp. 497. Hoenig, J. M. & A. H. Walsh (1983): Skeletal lesions and deformities in large sharks. J. Wildl. Dis., 19, 27-33. Jardas, I. & Z. Homen (1977): Nouvelles trouvailles sur les anomalies anatomiques des exemplaires tératologi-ques des poissons adriatiques. Biljeske-Notes, 34, 1-10. Kaspiris, P. (1974): Primi riperti di Mustelus mediterra-neus Quign. Cap. e Raja polystigma Reg. (Selachii) nel Mar Jonio (golfo di Patrasso e dintorno). Doriana, 5(218), 1-3. Lloris, D. & J. Rucabado (1998): Guide FAO d'identification des espèces pour les besoins de la pêche. Guide d'identification des ressources marines vivantes pour le Maroc. FAO, Rome, 263 p. Mancini, P. L., A. L. Casas & A. F. Amorim (2006): Morphological abnormalities in a blue shark Prionace glauca (Chondrichthyes: Carcharhinidae) foetus from southern Brazil. J. Fish Biol., 69, 1881-1884. Matallanas, J. (1977): Algunas consideraciones sobre Raja polystigma Regan 1923 (Rajiformes, Rajidae) de la Mar Catalana. Vie Milieu, 27(1), 101-110. Mejri, H., J. Ben Souissi, J. Zaouali, A. El Abed, Y. Vergne, O. Guélorget & C. Capapé (2004): On the recent occurrence of elasmobranch species in a perimediterra-nean lagoon: the Tunis Southern Lagoon (Northern Tunisia). Annales, Ser. Hist. Nat., 14(2), 143-158. Mnasri, N., M. Boumaïza & C. Capapé (2009): Mor-pological data, observations and occurrence of a rare skate, Leucoraja circularis (Chondrichthyes: Rajidae), off the northern coast of Tunisia (central Mediterranean). PanamJAS, 4(1), 70-78. Mzoughi, N., F. Hellal, M. Dachraoui, J.-P. Villeneuve, C. Cattini, S. de Mora S. & A. El Abed (2002): Méthodologie de l'extraction des hydrocarbures polycycliques. Application à des sédiments de la lagune de Bizerte (Tunisie). C. R. Geoscience, 334, 893-901. Oldfield, R. (2005): Biology, husbandry, and reproduction of freshwater stingrays. http://deepblue.lib.umich. edu/index.jsp Palmer, G. & A. C. Wheeler (1958): Teratological example of an electric ray, Torpedo nobiliana Bonaparte. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 130, 449-454. Quéro, J. C., P. Porché & J. J. Vayne (2003): Guide des poissons de l'Atlantique européen. Les Guides du naturaliste. Delachaux & Niestlé, Lonay (Switzerland)-Paris, 465 p. Ribeiro-Prado, C. C., M. C. Oddone, M. M. B. Gonzalez, A. Ferreira de Amorim & C. Capape (2008): Morphological abnormalities in skates and rays (Chon-drichthyes) from off Southeastern Brazil. Arq. Cien. Mar. Fortaleza, 41(2), 21-28. Rosa, R. S., U. L. Gomes & O. B. G. Gadig (1996): Um caso de teratogeniana raia de agua doce Potamotrygon motoro (Natterer in Müller e Henle, 1841) (Chondrich-thyes: Potamotrygonidae). Rev. Nord. Biol., 11(2), 125132. Saidi, B., M. N. Bradai, S. Marouani, O. Guelorget & C. Capape (2006): Atypical characteristics in a partial albinos embryo Carcharhinus plumbeus (Chondrichthyes: Carcharhinidae) from the Gulf of Gabes. Acta Adriat., 47(2), 167-174. Smith, M. C. & P. C. Heemstra (1986): Smiths'sea fishes. Springer-Verlag editor, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo, 1047 p. Thorson, T. B., J. K. Langhammer & M. I. Oetinger (1983): Reproduction and development of the South American freshwater stingrays, Potamotrygon circularis and P. motoro. Environ. Biol. Fish, 9(1), 3-24. Tortonese, E. (1956): Fauna d'ltalia. Leptocardia, Ciclo-stomati, Selachii. Calderini, Bologna, 334 p. Valle, A. (1931): Contributo alla teratologia dei Crosta-cei e dei Pesci Adriatici. Atti Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat. Trieste, 11(2), 360-363. Vannucinni, S. (1988): Shark, utilization, marketing and trade. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, No. 389. FAO, Rome, 470 p.