Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 119/2, 1–9, Ljubljana 2023 doi:10.14720/aas.2023.119.2.2645 Original research article / izvirni znanstveni članek Classification of pomegranate cultivars by multivariate analysis of bio- chemical constituents of HPLC Mohammad SAADATIAN 1, 2 , Haval ABDULLAH 1 , Fatima YOUSIF 1 , Rwa ASKANDAR 1 , Roya RIZGAR 1 , Maryam SABER 1 Received April 01, 2022; accepted April 02, 2023. Delo je prispelo 1. aprila 2022, sprejeto 2. aprila 2023 1 Soran University, Faculty of Education, General Science Department, Soran, Kurdistan Regional Government, Iraq 2 Corresponding author, e-mail: Mohammad.saadatian@soran.edu.iq Classification of pomegranate cultivars by multivariate analy- sis of biochemical constituents of HPLC Abstract: Pomegranate fruits are highly diverse and may be divided into geographical groupings based on their char- acteristics. Genetic research has verified these categories in recent years and further categorized variants into geographic- genetic groupings. This study aimed to assess the biochemical contents of eight varieties of pomegranate fruit seed and the categorization of pomegranate using multivariate statistical analysis. Polyphenolic chemicals are key secondary metabo- lites in pomegranate, and their presence influences the quality and sensory qualities of the fruit they produce. Fruit extracts from the Faqyan cultivar contained the highest total phenolic content of all studied cultivars. Pomegranate cultivars such as Shaqlawa, Halabja Sour, and Faqyan were shown to have the highest antioxidant activity. Gallic acid, caffeic acid, chloro- genic acid, p-coumaric acid, cinnamic acid, rutin, apigenin, rosmaric acid, and quercetin were the most abundant phyto- chemical components in the study. According to the results of multivariate analysis, pomegranate cultivars were divided into four major groups. The pomegranate fruit seed is the most abundant source of antioxidants and beneficial phytochemical elements. Finally, the Sidakan Sweet and Shaqlawa cultivars in- cluded a significant content polyphenolic compounds. Key words: antioxidant; gallic acid; chlorogenic acid; Pu- nica granatum, phenolic compounds Razvrščanje sort granatnega jabolka z multivariatno analizo biokemičnih sestavin izmerjenih s HPLC Izvleček: Plodovi granatnega jabolka so zelo raznoliki in jih lahko razdelimo v geografske skupine na osnovi njihovih la- stnosti. Genetske raziskave so v zadnjih letih potrdile te skupi- ne in jih nadalje razčlenile v geografsko genetetske podskupine. Namen te raziskave je bil ugotoviti biokemično sestavo plodov osmih sort granatnega jabolka z multivariatno analizo. Polife- noli so glavna sestavina sekundarnih metabolitov v granatnem jabolku, njihova prisotnost vpliva na kakovost in senzorične la- stnosti plodov. Izvlečki plodov iz sorte Faqyan so vsebovali naj- več polifenolov izmed vseh preučevanih sort. Sorte granatnega jabolka kot so Shaqlawa, Halabja Sour in Faqyan so se izkazale z največjo antioksidacijsko aktivnostjo. Galna, kavna, klorogen- ska, p-kumarna, cimetna in rožmarinska kislina, rutin, apige- nin, in kvercetin so bile najboj pogoste fitokemične komponen- te v tej raziskavi. Na osnovi multivariatne analize so bile sorte granatnega jabolka razdeljene v štiri glavne skupine. Sočen ovoj semen granatnega jabolka je najbolj pogost vir antioksidantov in drugih ugodnih sestavin. Sorti Sidakan Sweet in Shaqlawa sta se izkazali z značilno veliko vsebnostjo polifenolov. Ključne besede: antioksidanti; galna kislina; klorogenska kislina; Punica granatum; fenolne spojine Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 119/2 – 2023 2 M. SAADATIAN et al. 1 INTRODUCTION The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) which is originally described throughout Mediterranean region is a fruit crop that belongs to the Punicaceae family and has gained popularity in recent years due to its multi-func- tionality and high nutritional value when consumed as part of a healthy diet. In present it is grown worldwide in a variety of geographical regions, meeting the nutri- tional and medicinal requirements of people in a variety of countries. (Holland et al., 2009). Countries such as Iran, India, Egypt, China, Israel, Tunisia, Syria, Lebanon, Turkey; Greece; Cyprus; Italy; France; Spain; Chile; Por- tugal; the United States; Oman; and most recently, South Africa are growing in commercial pomegranate orchards a variety of pomegranate cultivars (Caleb et al., 2012; Holland et al., 2009). Among the many nutrients found in the edible part of the fruit are high concentrations of acids, sugars, polyphenolics, and essential minerals (Al- Maiman & Ahmad, 2002). The fruit is most commonly consumed as fresh arils or processed products, primar- ily juice. The color of the pomegranate fruit’s outer peel does not indicate how ripe it is or whether if it is ready for consumption (Holland et al., 2009). Fruit quality as- sessment and classification are frequently based on fac- tors such as the color of the aril, the total soluble solids content, and the presence of organic acids (Cristosto et al., 2000; Martinez et al., 2006). The extraordinarily high antioxidant capacity of pomegranates, directly correlated with the high amount and unique composition of phe- nolic compounds in the fruit, is credited with the fruit’s favorable health properties. (Borochov-Neori et al., 2011; Fischer et al., 2011; Gil et al., 2000). Pomegranate seeds, which are a byproduct of pome- granate juice manufacturing, include a variety of nutra- ceutical components, including sterols, alpha-tocopher- ol, punicic acid, and hydroxybenzoic acids, among other substances (Kwan & Kowalski, 1978), suggesting that the extracts of pomegranate seed residue might be used as a nutraceutical resource, according to the research (Revilla & González-SanJosé, 2002) On the other hand, according to some researchers Pomegranate aril and juice contain a significant amount of polyphenolics, primarily com- posed of ellagitannins (punicalagin), gallic acid, ellagic acid, anthocyanins, catechins, caffeic acid, and quercetin derivatives. (Viuda‐Martos et al., 2010). The amounts of these substances are dependent on the cultivars, the environment conditions, of the growing location where pomegranate ochards are established (Melgarejo et al., 2000). Many different pomegranate cultivars from Iran, Turkey, the United States, Italy, and South Africa have been investigated thus far for their polyphenolic content in their juice. However, prior to this study, no profile comparison of polyphenol composition and antioxidant capacity in sweet and sour pomegranates from different regions of Iraq’s Kurdistan region was conducted. Kurdistan is a regional supplier of pomegranate, and it has more favorable growing circumstances than any other region where the fruit crop is grown. Pomegranates grown in the neighborhood are di- verse and have been adapted to the many natural states of Kurdistan’s environment. As a result, the loss of geneti- cal diversity in crop species as a result of commercializa- tion has prompted the need to safeguard the genetic re- sources that are currently available. Unfortunately, there is currently no information available on the diversity in chemicalcomposition of pomegranate fruit in Kurdistan, aside from a recent article by Mohammad et al. (2018) that looked at the physic-chemical properties of selected fruit cultivars at commercial harvest. In this study, the goal was to develop; using chemical analyses, as a clas- sification model that would allow to classify Kurdistan pomegranates according to cultivars without regard to the effects of climate or geographical origin, and that would be based on the phenolic composition of the seed arils of pomegranates. 2 MATERIAL AND METHODS 2.1 POMEGRANATE SAMPLES Fruits of selected cultivars of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) (4 kg) were manually collected at com- mercial maturity from commercial Kurdistan region vineyards in the eight geographical regions (see Table 1). Samples were transported on ice and stored at -20 °C un- til required and destemmed while frozen. 2.2 POLYPHENOLICS 2.2.1 Extraction and analysis of polyphenolics: In order to extract polyphenolics, 2 g of the pow- dered sample was removed and after adding 4 ml of methanol solvent containing 1 % acetic acid, the extrac- tion process was performed under ultrasonic waves for 20 minutes. The phenolic acids studied in this study were isolated, identified, and quantified applying HPLC (high- performance liquid chromatography) device model 1100 series (Agilent USA), prepared with an injection loop of 20 microliters, four solvent gradient pump, degassing sys- tem, Column oven (set at 25 °C), and diode array detec- tor, set at 250, 272 and 310 nm, respectively. Isolation on the Ceylon octadecyl column (inner diameter 4.6 mm, Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 119/2 – 2023 3 Classification of pomegranate cultivars by multivariate analysis of biochemical constituents of HPLC length 25 cm, a particle size of 5 micrometers ZORBAX Eclipse XDB). In order to process the data, Chemstation software was applied. 2.3 TOTAL ANTIOXIDANT Total antioxidant was measured according to the method of Brand Williams et al. (1995) (Brand-Williams et al., 1995) by DPPH standard. 2.4 TOTAL PHENOLIC CONTENT Following the colorimetric oxidation/reduction reaction of phenolics, the total phenolics content was measured using the Folin Ciocalteau technique described by Singleton et al. (1999), with minor modifications. Polyphenolics were extracted by adding 10 ml 85 per- cent methanol to 1 g fine powder of samples and mixing thoroughly. After that, by the addition of 2.5 ml of Folin- Cicalteau reagent and 2 ml of 7.5 % sodium carbonate. For 1.5 to 2 hours, the samples were shaken vigorously. A spectrophotometer was used to measure the absorb- ance of the samples at 765 nm (PG Instruments T80 UV , UK). The calibration curve was created using gallic acid. The results were presented in milligrams of GAE per 100 grams of fresh mass (FM). 2.5 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS SAS 9.2 software was used to analyze all of the data (SAS, 2009). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, and significant differences between groups were determined using Tukey’s multiple range tests at a p ≤ 0.05. In addition, distinct genotypes were classified based on the presence of phytochemical sub- stances. In order to analyze the variables, principal com- ponent analysis (PCA) and hierarchical cluster analy- sis (HCA) were carried out with the help of the Excel spreadsheet program XLSTAT (2018). 3 RESULT AND DISCUSSION 3.1 HPLC ANALYSIS OF THE SAMPLES Figure 1 demonstrates the chromatogram of nine standards that were injected into an HPLC system. Between the eight cultivars studied in this study, the amounts of specific phenolic acid acids (gallic acid, caf- feic acid, chlorogenic acid, p-coumaric acid, cinnamic acid, and rosmaric acid), as well as flavonoids (rutin, apigenin, and quercetin), were found to be considerably different (Table 2). Gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, and coumaric acid were found as the most abundant phe- nolic compounds in the extracts of grape fruits. The high concentrations of gallic acid (68.6 mg kg -1 ), caffeic acid (19.2 mg kg -1 ), chlorogenic acid (202.2 mg kg -1 ), p‐cou- maric acid (74.25 mg kg -1 ), cinnamic acid (3.3 mg kg -1 ), rutin (6.12 mg kg -1 ), apigenin (11.26 mg kg -1 ), rosmaric acid (2.51 mg kg -1 ) and quercetin (10.17 mg kg -1 ) were obtained in ‘Sidak Sweet’ , ’Hiran’ , ’Shaqlawa’ , , and ’Bala- kayati’ pomegranate seed fruit extracts, respectively. The highest concentrations of gallic acid, caffeic acid, rutin, and apigenin were observed in Sidak Sweet cultivar fruit extracts and p-coumaric acid, rosmaric acid, and cinamic acid concentration in ‘Shaqlawa’ fruit seed aril grown in Erbil province. 3.2 ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY According to Figure 2, the antioxidant activity was influenced by both the cultivar and the samples’ location. According to the results, the highest antioxidant activity was achieved from ‘Shaqlawa’ fruit extract (80 %), and Table 1: Sampling locations of the different pomegranate cultivars studied Cultivar province Height (m) Latitude Longitude ‘Sidakan Sweet’ Erbil 1502.0 36.5579 44.8283 ‘Sidakan Sour’ Erbil 777.0 36.6085 44.5239 ‘Shaqlawa’ Erbil 975.0 36.7990 44.6704 ‘Balakayati’ Erbil 1145.0 36.4098 44.3201 ‘Halab Sweet’ Sulaymaniyah 928.0 36.2995 44.4136 ‘Halab Sour’ Sulaymaniyah 927.0 36.4098 44.3202 ‘Faqyan’ Erbil 870.0 36.54 44.539 ‘Hiran’ Erbil 650.0 36.283 44.496 Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 119/2 – 2023 4 M. SAADATIAN et al. Table 2: Content of biochemical compounds in fruits of different pomegranate cultivars Cultivars Gallic acid (mg kg -1 ) Caffeic acid (mg kg -1 ) Chlorogenic acid (mg kg -1 ) Rutin (mg kg -1 ) p-Coumaric acid (mg kg -1 ) Rosmaric acid (mg kg -1 ) Quercetin (mg kg -1 ) Cinnamic acid (mg kg -1 ) Apigenin (mg kg -1 ) Sidak Sweet 68.6a 19.2a 95.7c 6.12a 28.08c 0.78f 3.29e 0.57d 11.26a Sidak Sour 39.45b 10.77b 56.88e 0.72d 10.85e 0.36g 1.77g o.31g 2.9f Shaqlawa 28.5c 2.91e 136.5b 0.6f 74.25a 2.51a 9.99b 3.3a 7.83b Balakayati 28.35d 1.92f 82.26d 3.24b 28.15b 1.06d 10.17a 0.86c 6.02d Halab Sweet 13.32e 0.26h 18.51f 0.1g 6.71g 1.35b 1.28h 0.54e 2.48g Halab Sour 13.23f 0.55g 19.97g 0.06h 4.47h 1.17c 2.81f 0.47f 3.79e Faqyan 11.75g 4.66c 11.96h 0.67e 10.15f 0.3h 4.64c 1.1b 6.89c Hiran 11.31h 3.73d 202.25a 0.93c 11.69d 1e 3.68d 0.31g 1.49h Figure 1: HPLC chromatograms of nine biochemical standards Figure 2: Antioxidant activities of different cultivars of pome- granate seeds by DPPH assay Figure 3: Total Phenolic content (TPC) of different cultivars of pomegranate seed Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 119/2 – 2023 5 Classification of pomegranate cultivars by multivariate analysis of biochemical constituents of HPLC the lowest antioxidant activity was found in ‘Hiran’ fruit extract (38 %). 3.3 TOTAL PHENOLIC CONTENT (TPC) The TPC values of fruit extracts of pomegranate seed cultivars are presented in Figure 3. The amount of TPC in the fruits extracts obtained varied from 33 mg GAE 100 ml -1 extract in Halabja sour cultivar to 338.2 mg GAE 100 ml -1 extract in Faqyan cultivar. Results showed that TPC of extracts was influenced significantly by sam- pling location. 3.4 CLASSIFICATION OF POMEGRANATE CUL- TIV ARS HCA, PCA and were performed to classify the pomegranate cultivar regarding the 11 main traits (TPC, DPPH, gallic acid, caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, p‐cou- maric acid, cinnamic acid, rosmaric acid, rutin, apigenin, and quercetin). The Ward linkage method carried out the cluster analysis (Figure 4). Based on this analysis, the pomegranate cultivars were classified into four main clusters group. In the first cluster, cultivars of ‘Faqyan’ were designated as the cultivars with the highest TPC. In the second cluster, a cultivar of ‘Halabja’ sweet and ‘Hala- bja’ sour were determined due to high amounts of antiox- idant capacity. As a result of significant concentrations of gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, p-coumaric acid, and TPC, the ‘Balakayati’ , ‘Sidakan Sweet’ , and ‘Sidakan Sour’ were found in the third cluster. Finally but not least, the cul- tivar of Shaqlawa and Hiran was found to have a signifi- cant concentration of chlorogenic acid, coumaric acid, and TPC, which contributed to its classification as the fourth cluster. PCA graph is shown in Figure 5. A PCA was per- formed, which reduced the multidimensional structure of the data and produced a two-dimensional map that could be used to explain the observed variation. 65.1 % of the total variation could be attributed to the first two components of the PCA (35.06 % for component 1 and 30.05  % for component 2). Correlations between the first component (PC1) and coumaric acid, quercetin, cinnamic acid, and apigenin are extremely strong posi- Figure 4: Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) of pomegranate cultivars based on the 11 main traits Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 119/2 – 2023 6 M. SAADATIAN et al. tive. Gallic acid, caffeic acid, and rosmaric acid are the primary constituents of the second principal component (PC2), separating the samples. 4 DISCUSSION Results exhibited considerable variation in geno- types. According to previous research, the levels of poly- phenolic compounds of gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, and caffeic acid in pomegranates grown in Chinese farms have been reported in 70-1400, 900-4800, and 1100-2440 mg kg -1 DM, respectively (Li et al., 2015). The total phe- nolic content (TPC) of the juice samples ranged from 0.87 to 1.93 mg of gallic acid equivalents per mL (Russo et al., 2018). Other researchers have also discovered in- consistencies in the concentration of particular phenolic acids in different cultivars of the same plant (Fischer et al., 2011; Gundogdu & Yilmaz, 2012; Lansky & Newman, 2007). These differences were generated not only by vari- ations in cultivar, growing region, and maturity level of the pomegranates under investigation but also by varia- tions in the analytical procedures employed. It is possible to endogenously regulate the biosynthesis of the phenolic composition of fruits during various developmental vari- ations in their life cycle (Gholizadeh-Moghadam et al., 2019) which exogenous agents can influence metabo- lism pathways. It is obvious that the antiradical activity against DPPH and ABTS radicals increases along with the overall phenolic concentration regardless of the ma- trix. This is something that can be observed. This indi- cates that the phenolic compounds that possess antiradi- cal characteristics are the ones that were discovered in the samples (Russo et al., 2018). Exogenous factors such as environmental conditions (temperature, biotic and abiotic stress, light intensity, humidity) and agricultural practices (soil fertility, irrigation) have an impact on the biosynthesis and accumulation of phenolic compounds in medicinal plants, which are fully addressed below (Alirezalu et al., 2018; Ghasemzadeh et al., 2012). The amino acid phenylalanine, which is synthesized via the shikimic acid pathway, is a precursor for several phenolic compounds. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase is responsi- ble for forming these compounds due to the de-amina- tion of phenylalanine (PAL) (Shahidi & Chandrasekara, 2010). Environmental factors, remarkably light, are one of the most potent factors in phenolic metabolism, and they are significant. The light that impacts PAL increases the synthesis of phenolic compounds in the presence of oxygen(Macheix et al., 2018). Wang et al. (2003) reported that the amount of phe- nolic compounds in a solution increases dramatically with increasing temperature and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) concentration. There is a possibility that the differences discovered in phenolic compounds between genotypes in this study are related to environmental factors such as geographic variations (altitude, latitude, and height), light intensity, and temperature. Figure 5: Principal component analysis (PCA) of pomegranate cultivars based on the 11 main traits Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 119/2 – 2023 7 Classification of pomegranate cultivars by multivariate analysis of biochemical constituents of HPLC According to the DPPH assay, pomegranate has a range of antioxidant activity ranging from 45 percent to 82 percent, consistent with our present findings. The ex- amination of the antioxidant capacity of the fruit extract revealed that this cultivar possesses significant antioxi- dant potential due to the presence of simple phenolics, anthocyanins, phenolic acids, and flavonoids in the ex- tract (Çam et al., 2009). Investigators have suggested that carotenes, vitamin C, butylated hydroxytoluene, and phenolic compounds are among the components in fruit extracts with significant radical scavenging capability and that these compounds are found in high concentrations in some fruits (Sayyah et al., 2010; Yildiz et al., 2014). The antioxidant activity of the pomegranate extract is highly correlated with the extract’s phenolic contents, including rutin, caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, and apigenin. This study found a substantial correlation between rutin and caffeic acid and antioxidant activity, which is consistent with earlier studies (Chen & Ho, 1997; Mariangel et al., 2013). Considering a study conducted by Castelluccio et al. (1995) on the antioxidant activity of chlorogenic acid and caffeic acid, they concluded that these compounds were more active than p-coumaric acid. Furthermore, Cos et al. (2002) noted that, caffeic acid had the highest scavenging activity in fruits. According to earlier research, the TPC of pome- granate fruits has previously been observed to range from 53 to 200 (mg GAE ml -1 ) across pomegranate culti- vars obtained from South Africa (Fawole & Opara, 2013). The relationship between latitude and total polyphenolic concentration, total reducing capacity, and DPPH radical scavenging capacity (Li et al., 2015) was positive, reveal- ing that pomegranates grown in high latitude and low latitude longitude regions are more likely to accumulate more polyphenolics and have more significant antioxi- dant potential in their aril juice. As far as we know, the factors that regulate and control the production of fruit polyphenols have not been identified because the factors that influence polyphenol production among cultivars range from intrinsic genetic factors to various extrinsic environmental factors their interactions have varied over time and space (Hättenschwiler & Vitousek, 2000). The PCA and cluster analysis were acceptable meth- odologies for determining cultivar classification among pomegranate varieties. The antioxidant capabilities of pomegranates have been demonstrated in several phyto- chemical investigations conducted on several pomegran- ate cultivars. In addition, it has been established by many research groups that the polyphenol content and flavo- noids present in the fruits of pomegranate varietals have antioxidant properties. 5 CONCLUSION There were significant variances in polyphenolic content amongst the different cultivars, which was no- ticed. This observation demonstrates that the relation- ship between genotype and environment is one of the most important elements influencing the accumulation and concentration of polyphenolics in pomegranate fruit. Furthermore, these findings demonstrated that pomegranate varieties are prospective sources of natural antioxidants and phenolic compounds employed in the food industry and that multivariate analysis was an ap- propriate method for classifying the pomegranate sam- ples. 6 REFERENCES Al-Maiman, S. A., & Ahmad, D. (2002). Changes in physical and chemical properties during pomegranate (Punica gra- natum L.) fruit maturation. Food Chemistry, 76(4), 437- 441. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00301-6 Alirezalu, A., Salehi, P., Ahmadi, N., Sonboli, A., Aceto, S., Hatami Maleki, H., & Ayyari, M. (2018). Flavonoids profile and antioxidant activity in flowers and leaves of hawthorn species (Crataegus spp.) from different regions of Iran. In- ternational Journal of Food Properties, 21(1), 452-470. htt- ps://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2018.1446146 Borochov-Neori, H., Judeinstein, S., Harari, M., Bar-Ya’akov, I., Patil, B. S., Lurie, S., & Holland, D. (2011). Climate ef- fects on anthocyanin accumulation and composition in the pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) fruit arils. Journal of Ag- ricultural and Food Chemistry, 59(10), 5325-5334. https:// doi.org/10.1021/jf2003688 Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M.-E., & Berset, C. (1995). Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 28(1), 25-30. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5 Caleb, O. J., Opara, U. L., & Witthuhn, C. R. (2012). Modified atmosphere packaging of pomegranate fruit and arils: a re- view. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 5(1), 15-30. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11947-011-0525-7 Çam, M., Hışıl, Y., & Durmaz, G. (2009). Classification of eight pomegranate juices based on antioxidant capacity measured by four methods. Food Chemistry, 112(3), 721- 726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.06.009 Castelluccio, C., Paganga, G., Melikian, N., Paul Bolwell, G., Pridham, J., Sampson, J., & Rice-Evans, C. (1995). Anti- oxidant potential of intermediates in phenylpropanoid metabolism in higher plants. FEBs Letters, 368(1), 188-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(95)00639-Q Chen, J. H., & Ho, C.-T. (1997). Antioxidant activities of caf- feic acid and its related hydroxycinnamic acid compounds. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 45(7), 2374- 2378. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf970055t Cos, P ., Rajan, P ., V edernikova, I., Calomme, M., Pieters, L., Vli- etinck, A. J., . . . Berghe, D. V . (2002). In vitro antioxidant pro- Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 119/2 – 2023 8 M. SAADATIAN et al. file of phenolic acid derivatives. Free Radical Research, 36(6), 711-716. https://doi.org/10.1080/10715760290029182 Cristosto, C., Mitcham, E., & Kader, A. (2000). Pomegranate: recommendations for maintaining postharvest quality. Pro- duce Facts. Postharvest Research and Information Centre, University of California, Davis, USA. Csomós, E., Héberger, K., & Simon-Sarkadi, L. (2002). Principal component analysis of biogenic amines and polyphenols in Hungarian wines. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chem- istry, 50(13), 3768-3774. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf011699a Fawole, O. A., & Opara, U. L. (2013). Effects of maturity sta- tus on biochemical content, polyphenol composition and antioxidant capacity of pomegranate fruit arils (‘Bhagwa’). South African Journal of Botany, 85, 23-31. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.sajb.2012.11.010 Fischer, U. A., Carle, R., & Kammerer, D. R. (2011). Identifi- cation and quantification of phenolic compounds from pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel, mesocarp, aril and differently produced juices by HPLC-DAD–ESI/MSn. Food Chemistry, 127(2), 807-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.food- chem.2010.12.156 Ghasemzadeh, A., Omidvar, V ., & Jaafar, H. Z. (2012). Polyphe- nolic content and their antioxidant activity in leaf extract of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas). Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 6(15), 2971-2976. https://doi.org/10.5897/ JMPR11.1353 Gholizadeh-Moghadam, N., Hosseini, B., & Alirezalu, A. (2019). Classification of barberry genotypes by multivari- ate analysis of biochemical constituents and HPLC pro- files. Phytochemical Analysis, 30(4), 385-394. https://doi. org/10.1002/pca.2821 Gil, M. I., Tomás-Barberán, F. A., Hess-Pierce, B., Holcroft, D. M., & Kader, A. A. (2000). Antioxidant activity of pome- granate juice and its relationship with phenolic composition and processing. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 48(10), 4581-4589. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf000404a Gundogdu, M., & Yilmaz, H. (2012). Organic acid, phenolic profile and antioxidant capacities of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars and selected genotypes. Scientia Horticulturae, 143, 38-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scien- ta.2012.05.029 Hättenschwiler, S., & Vitousek, P. M. (2000). The role of poly- phenols in terrestrial ecosystem nutrient cycling. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 15(6), 238-243. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01861-9 Holland, D., Hatib, K., & Bar-Ya’akov, I. (2009). 2 Pomegran- ate: Botany, horticulture, breeding. Horticultural Reviews, 35(2), 127-191. Kwan, W., & Kowalski, B. (1978). Classifi- cation of wines by applying pattern recognition to chemi- cal composition data. Journal of Food Science, 43(4), 1320- 1323. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470593776.ch2 Lansky, E. P ., & Newman, R. A. (2007). Punica granatum (pome- granate) and its potential for prevention and treatment of inflammation and cancer. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 109(2), 177-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2006.09.006 Li, X., Wasila, H., Liu, L., Yuan, T., Gao, Z., Zhao, B., & Ah- mad, I. (2015). Physicochemical characteristics, polyphe- nol compositions and antioxidant potential of pomegran- ate juices from 10 Chinese cultivars and the environmental factors analysis. Food Chemistry, 175, 575-584. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.003 Macheix, J.-J., Fleuriet, A., & Billot, J. (2018). Fruit phenolics. CRC press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351072175 Mariangel, E., Díaz, M. R., Alvarez, W . L., Bensch, E., Schalchli, H., & Ibarra, P . (2013). The antioxidant properties of calafate (Berberis microphylla) fruits from four different locations in southern Chile. Ciencia e Investigación Agraria: Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias de la Agricultura, 40(1), 161- 170. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-16202013000100014 Martinez, J., Melgarejo, P., Hernández, F., Salazar, D., & Mar- tinez, R. (2006). Seed characterisation of five new pome- granate (Punica granatum L.) varieties. Scientia Hor- ticulturae, 110(3), 241-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. scienta.2006.07.018 Melgarejo, P., Salazar, D. M., & Artes, F. (2000). Organic acids and sugars composition of harvested pomegranate fruits. European Food Research and Technology, 211(3), 185-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002170050021 Mohammad, S., Abdurahman, P., Salim, K., Younis, P., Ab- durahman, H., & Mohammad, S. (2018). Physico-chemical characteristics of pomegranate accessions from the Kurdis- tan Region, Iraq. Journal of Agricultural Sciences (Belgrade), 63(4), 355-366. https://doi.org/10.2298/JAS1804355M Revilla, I., & González-SanJosé, M. L. (2002). Multivariate eval- uation of changes induced in red wine characteristics by the use of extracting agents. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50(16), 4525-4530. https://doi.org/10.1021/ jf020175n Russo, M., Fanali, C., Tripodo, G., Dugo, P ., Muleo, R., Dugo, L., . . . Mondello, L. (2018). Analysis of phenolic compounds in different parts of pomegranate (Punica granatum) fruit by HPLC-PDA-ESI/MS and evaluation of their antioxidant activity: application to different Italian varieties. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 410(15), 3507-3520. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-0854-8 Sayyah, M., Boostani, H., Pakseresht, S., & Malayeri, A. (2010). Comparison of Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn. with fluox- etine in the treatment of obsessive− compulsive disorder. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 34(2), 362-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pn- pbp.2009.12.016 Shahidi, F., & Chandrasekara, A. (2010). Hydroxycinnamates and their in vitro and in vivo antioxidant activities. Phyto- chemistry Reviews, 9(1), 147-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11101-009-9142-8 Singleton, V. L., Orthofer, R., & Lamuela-Raventós, R. M. (1999). [14] Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. In Methods in enzymology, 299, 152-178). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1 Viuda‐Martos, M., Fernández‐López, J., & Pérez‐Álvarez, J. (2010). Pomegranate and its many functional components as related to human health: a review. Comprehensive Re- views in Food Science and Food Safety, 9(6), 635-654. htt- ps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00131.x Wang, S. Y ., Bunce, J. A., & Maas, J. (2003). Elevated carbon di- oxide increases contents of antioxidant compounds in field- Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 119/2 – 2023 9 Classification of pomegranate cultivars by multivariate analysis of biochemical constituents of HPLC grown strawberries. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chem- istry, 51(15), 4315-4320. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf021172d Yildiz, H., Ercisli, S., Sengul, M., Topdas, E. F., Beyhan, O., Ca- kir, O., . . . Orhan, E. (2014). Some physicochemical char- acteristics, bioactive content and antioxidant characteris- tics of non-sprayed Barberry (Berberis vulgaris L.) fruits from Turkey. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 56(4), 123-129. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10341-014-0216-4