Digitalna knjižnica Slovenije
Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica
Splošne knjižnice
Celjsko območje
Vse knjižnice območja
Osrednja knjižnica Celje
Knjižnica Laško
Osrednja knjižnica Mozirje
Knjižnica Šentjur
Knjižnica Šmarje
Knjižnica Velenje
Medobčinska splošna knjižnica Žalec
Dolenjsko območje
Knjižnica Mirana Jarca Novo mesto
Knjižnica Brežice
Knjižnica Kočevje
Valvasorjeva knjižnica Krško
Knjižnica Miklova hiša, Ribnica
Gorenjsko območje
Mestna knjižnica Kranj
Občinska knjižnica Jesenice
Knjižnica A. T. Linharta, Radovljica
Knjižnica Ivana Tavčarja, Škofja Loka
Knjižnica dr. Toneta Pretnarja, Tržič
Goriško območje
Vse knjižnice območja
Goriška knjižnica Franceta Bevka Nova Gorica
Lavričeva knjižnica, Ajdovščina
Mestna knjižnica in čitalnica Idrija
Knjižnica Cirila Kosmača Tolmin
Koroško območje
Koroška osrednja knjižnica dr. Franca Sušnika Ravne na Koroškem
Knjižnica Radlje ob Dravi
Knjižnica Ksaverja Meška, Slovenj Gradec
Obalno-kraško območje
Osrednja knjižnica Srečka Vilharja Koper
Knjižnica Makse Samsa, Ilirska Bistrica
Mestna knjižnica Izola - Biblioteca civica di Isola->Matična knjižnica Izola
Mestna knjižnica Piran
Kosovelova knjižnica Sežana
Osrednjeslovensko območje
Mestna knjižnica Ljubljana
Knjižnica Jožeta Udoviča, Cerknica
Knjižnica Domžale
Knjižnica Grosuplje
Knjižnica Franceta Balantiča Kamnik
Knjižnica Litija
Knjižnica Logatec
Knjižnica Medvode
Cankarjeva knjižnica Vrhnika
Pomursko območje
Pokrajinska in študijska knjižnica Murska Sobota
Javni zavod Knjižnica Gornja Radgona
Splošna knjižnica Ljutomer
Spodnjedravsko območje
Knjižnica Ivana Potrča Ptuj
Knjižnica Franca Ksavra Meška Ormož
Štajersko območje
Mariborska knjižnica
Knjižnica Lenart
Knjižnica Josipa Vošnjaka Slovenska Bistrica
Druge knjižnice
Bayerische StaatsBibliotek
Centralna pravosodna knjižnica
Centralna tehniška knjižnica Univerze v Ljubljani
Knjižnica Dušana Černeta Trst
Kraljeva knjižnica, Danska nacionalna knjižnica in univerzitetna knjižnica v Kopenhagnu
Narodna in študijska knjižnica
Österreichische Nationalbibliothek
Semeniška knjižnica
Slovenska študijska knjižnica Celovec
Škrabčeva knjižnica
Univerzitetna knjižnica Maribor
Arhivi in muzeji
Arhiv Republike Slovenije
Goriški muzej
Loški muzej Škofja Loka
Muzej in galerije mesta Ljubljana
Muzej Miklova hiša
Muzej novejše zgodovine Celje
Narodni muzej Slovenije
Pokrajinski arhiv Maribor
Pokrajinski muzej Kočevje
Prirodoslovni muzej Slovenije
Slovenian Museum and Archives - Slovenski muzej in arhiv
Slovenski etnografski muzej
Slovenski šolski muzej
Škofijski arhiv Koper
Menu
SLO
|
ENG
author
full-text
keywords
date
title
source
publisher
collection
AND
OR
NOT
author
full-text
keywords
date
title
source
publisher
collection
AND
OR
NOT
author
full-text
keywords
date
title
source
publisher
collection
AND
OR
NOT
author
full-text
keywords
date
title
source
publisher
collection
AND
OR
NOT
ADVANCED SEARCH
About us
Cooperation
Terms of use
dLib Statistics
Partners
News
Virtual exhibitions
Contact us
My dLib.si
Email
:
Pass.:
Login
Register!
Forgoten password
home
query
URN:NBN:SI:DOC-EYBDY4TG
Zapri
Zapri
Legal remedies in asylum and immigration law : the balance between effectiveness and procedural autonomy?
1. PDF document (263 kB)
1. TXT document (43 kB)
Add to EndNote (RIS format)
Contibutor(s)
Králová, Alžbeta (author)
Language
english
Source
Central European Public Administration Review
Year
2018
Numbering
volume 16,
issue 1
Publisher
Fakulteta za upravo
Provider
Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za upravo
(Obvezni izvod spletne publikacije)
description
The paper tackles a widely discussed but still rather under-researched area of asylum and immigration law, more precisely its procedural aspects and its interactions within the public administration and administrative judiciary. It contributes to the debate about the Europeanization of public administration within the specific context of asylum and immigration law. The purpose of the paper is to examine the influence of European Union law on the legal regulation of administrative and judicial review of decisions rendered in asylum and immigration procedures. The research is based on an in-depth analysis of the dynamics of amendments and the motivation of national legislation while adopting new procedural rules in the above-mentioned areas on the case of the Czech Republic (based on the description and analysis of the legal regulation, explanatory memoranda and the case law, supplemented with certain comparative aspects). The procedural autonomy principle gets increasingly limited by other principles, namely the effectiveness principle and the principle of effective judicial protection. The paper therefore focuses on the margin of appreciation left to the national legislator: it determines whether the principle of procedural autonomy keeps the real relevancy while harmonising the asylum and immigration law and what is the influence of tensions between the aforementioned principles. The research shows that the legislator still maintains quite a wide degree of margin of appreciation in the administrative and judicial review of asylum and immigration decisions (apart from the visa procedures). However, a broadening of the interpretation of the effective judicial protection principle as provided by Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU decreases the scope of procedural autonomy and has the potential to influence not only individual legal remedy, but also the system of administrative or judicial remedies as such. Besides the overall findings related to the influence of European Union law on the review in asylum and immigration procedures, the article tackles numerous practical implications of amendments based in European Union law and practical challenges for the administrative and judicial review in concerned area of law. The paper provides a reaction to tensions coming from the need to find the balance between the obligation to provide an effective remedy and between the autonomy of Member States and their attempts to preserve national procedural traditions and specificities within the system of administrative and judicial review. It is original by its overall view on the problematic of remedies in asylum and immigration law and by a new perspective of interactions between national legislation and European Union law. Although the research is limited to the case study of the Czech Republic, certain aspects apply to other Member States with similarities within their system of administrative and judicial review.
Rights
URN
URN:NBN:SI:DOC-EYBDY4TG
COBISSID
5203886
Added
14.07.2020
Metadata
Citation
APA:
Králová, Alžbeta (2018). Legal remedies in asylum and immigration law.
Central European Public Administration Review
, volume 16, issue 1, str. 67-79
.
URN:NBN:SI:DOC-EYBDY4TG
from http://www.dlib.si
MLA:
Králová, Alžbeta. "Legal remedies in asylum and immigration law."
Central European Public Administration Review
volume 16. issue 1 (2018) str. 67-79.
<http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-EYBDY4TG>
Central European public administration review
2018-
(Assembly record)