ISSN 1408-3671 UDK 57(497.4) izdajate! j/pu bi isher Društvo biologov Slovenije ISSN 1408-3671 UDK 57(497.4) ~ACTA ~ BIOLOGICA SLOVENICA VOL. 46 ŠT. 2 LJUBLJANA 2003 prej/formerly BIOLOŠKI VESTNIK izdajatelj/publisher Društvo biologov Slovenije Acta Biologica Slovenica ACTA BIOLOGICA SLOVENICA LJUBLJANA 2003 Vol. 46, Št. 2 : 1- 60 Glasilo Društva biologov Slovenije - Joumal of Biological Society of Slovenia Izdaja - Published by Društvo biologov Slovenije - Biological Society of Slovenia Glavni in odgovorni urednik - Editor in Chief Mihael Jožef Toman, e-mail: mihael.toman@uni-lj .si Tehnični urednik - Managing Editor Branko Vreš, e-mail: branevr@zrc-sazu.si Uredniški odbor - Editorial Board Matija Gogala (SI), Nada Gogala (SI) Peter Maček (SI), Alenka Malej (SI), Andrej Martinčič (SI) , Harald Niklfeld (A), Livio Poldini (I), Boris Sket (SI), Robert Zorec (SI), Mitja Zupančič (SI), Thomas F. J. Martin (USA), Mark Tester (UK), Gerhard Thiel (D) Naslov uredništva - Adress of Editorial Office Acta Biologica Slovenica, Večna pot 111, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenija http://bijh.zrc-sazu.si/abs/ Oblikovanje - Design Žare Vrezec ISSN 1408-3671 UDK 57(497.4) Natisnjeno - Printed on: 2003 Tisk - Print: Tiskarna Pleško d.o.o. , Ljubljana Naklada: 500 izvodov Cena letnika (dve številki): 3.500 SIT za posameznike, 10.000 SIT za ustanove Številka žiro računa pri Ljubljanski banki: 50100-678-0045858 Publikacijo je sofinanciralo Ministrstvo za šolstvo, znanost in šport Republike Slovenije. Acta Biologica Slovenica je indeksirana v - is indexed in: Biological Abstracts, Zoological records. ACTA BIOLOGICA SLOVENICA LJUBLJANA 2003 Vol. 46, Št. 2 : 3 - 1 O Sprejeto (accepted): 2003-10-30 Non-foliar photosynthesis and its contribution to the overall carbon balance of plants Guido ASCHAN and Hardy PFANZ Institute of Applied Botany, University of Duisburg - Essen, 45117 Essen, FRG lntroduction Abstract. In addition to the green leaves, commonly considered as the main sources of photosynthate production, higher plants can potentially use nearly all vegetative and reproductive structures to perform photosynthetic CO 2 assimilation. Green leaves, stems and green sterile flower organs, optimized for light harvesting and photosynthetic performance, are characterized by net photosynthetic assimilation utilizing mainly the atmospheric carbon dioxide. In contrast, chlorophyll-containing bark and wood tissue, most fruit, root and fertile flower organs are primary sub- ordinated to non-photosynthetic functions, but typically perform an effective intemal CO 2 recycling using the respiratory released CO 2 • Non-foliar photosynthesis, either manifested as positive net photosynthesis or internal CO 2 refixation is regarded as an important strategy of additional carbon acquisition. The main strategies of additional carbon acquisition by non-foliar chlorophyllous organs are illustrated, presenting selected examples developed in reproductive as well as in vegetative plant structures. Keywords: floral photosynthesis, aerial roots, orchids, Helleborus, chlorophyll fluorescence Abbreviations: Chl = chlorophyll The visual impression of higher plants is typically dominated by green leaves as the main photosynthetic organ, but a closer look on herbaceous or even woody plants reveals a variety of non-foliar vegetative and moreover reproductive structures which contain chlorophyll and are thus potentially able to conduct photosynthetic CO 2 assirnilation. The positive net photosynthesis by green stems or flowers contrasts remarkably to the exclusive recycling of respiratory released CO 2 in fleshy fruits or bark tissues (BLANKE & LENZ 1989, PFANZ & AL. 2002). Independent of positive net photosynthesis or interna! CO 2 refixation there is no doubt, that photosynthesis of chlorophyllous tissues other than leaf mesophyll will both partially pay for their own carbon requirements and thus positively contribute to the overall carbon gain of plants. Since most existing information on the CO 2 exchange and carbon gain of higher vascular plants refers to Jeaves, data on the carbon budgets of stems, roots or fruits are almost entirely lacking (e.g. in epiphytes, see Zon & HIETZ 2001). Therefore, we intend to illurninate the importance of non- 4 Acta Biologica Slovenica, 46 (2), 2003 foliar photosynthesis as a strategy of additional carbon acquisition, presenting selected examples evolved in reproductive as well as in vegetative plant structures. While the photosynthetic activity of stem and bark tissues is mentioned elsewhere in this issue (see also PFANZ & AscHAN 2001, PFANZ & AL. 2002), we are focussing here on representative case studies of flora! and root photosynthesis. Methods Carbon fixation in non-foliar plant organs has typically -been measured using gas exchange or 14C-uptake techniques, but both methods may underestimate photosynthetic rates (e.g. BLANKE & LENZ 1989). Changes in extemal CO 2 often not adequately reflect CO 2 uptake in photosynthesis and in particular the amount of intemally-generated photosynthetically fixed CO 2 because of a low epidermal and cuticular permeability (cf. PFANZ & AscHAN 2001). Especially on bulky green fruit, root or stem material, chlorophyll fluorescence techniques are advantageous, because photosynthetic performance doesn' t depend on wether the CO 2 fixed originates extemally, or intemally via respiratory processes (see SMILLIE 1992). Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements on intact leaves and non-foliar organs were performed with a chlorophyll fluorometer PAM-210 (Walz, Effeltrich, Germany) under laboratory conditions (20°C). Instant light-response curves of the effective quantum yield (Y = Af< q, -2 N o o -4 o 500 1000 1500 2000 PFD [µmol photons m-2s-1] Fig. 1: Photosynthetic light response curves of Green Hellebore (Helleborus viridis) leaves (circles) and sepals (triangles). Measurements were performed in spring under constant climatic conditions (20°C, 75 % relative hurnidity) and a controlled CO 2 supply (350 ppm) using a CO 2 -porometer. Means with s.d. are presented; n = 12-14. The sepals of the germane Christmas Rose (Helleborus niger) are whitish at anthesis and get gradually green (in shaded plants) or pinkish-red (in sun-exposed plants) during seed ripening. Maximum electron transport rates (ETR) of green sepals reached slightly lower values about 60% of the leaves ' rates at medium PFDs (ca. 600 µmol photons m·2s· 1), as assessed by Chl fluorescence measurements, The maximum electron transport rates of red sepals, coloured by anthocyan-like pigments, were clearly reduced to about one fourth of the respective leaf rates. As expected, Helleborus leaves use the quantum energy 1.5 fold more efficient than the green sepals, whereas the red ones need three times more quantum energy to transport the same amount of electrons within PSII (see ASCHAN & PFANZ 2003). Using another method (0 2 gas-exchange) SALOPEK-SONDI & AL. (2000) reported photosynthetic capacities of greenish Helleborus niger sepals about 40-50 % of those of the green leaves. In greenish Helleborus sepals one third of the leaf Chl content (390 mg m·2, n = 6) was found, whereas red 6 Acta Biologica Slovenica, 46 (2), 2003 sepals contained only about 80 mg m·2 Chl. Also for orchid bracts Chl contents about one third of the respective leaves were obtained (e.g. Spiranthes cernua: ANTLFINGER & WENDEL 1997), whereas those of the pure white petals only amounted to 4 %. The pendulous, bell-shaped flowers of the Spring Snowflake (Leucojum vernum) have six equal white petals each tipped with an emerald green spot at the top. While the white areas of the petals are not photosynthetically active, even these small greenish spots achieve about 25 % of the ETR of the respective leaves (Fig. 2). Remarkably, similar photosynthetic activity was obtained for the shorter inner petals of the white-flowering Snowdrop (Galanthus nivalis), which are also marked with a terminal green spot (data not shown). 140 CI) -"' 120 l.. t:: o C. 100 u, C ~ 80 -C e 60 -(J CI) "i 40 CI) > ~ 20 "' "i l.. f o o ---------- / / / / /'/ • leaf ,, ... green pe a spo 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 PFD [µmol photons m·2s·11 1400 Fig. 2: Photosynthetic light response curves of leaves (circles) and green peta! spots (triangles) of Spring snowflake (Leucojum vernum). Relative electron transport rate (ETR), calculated as ETR = 0.5 x 0.84 x PFD x "F/Fm" (e.g. SCHREIBER ET AL. 1995), against photon flux density (PFD). Measurements were performed using a PAM-Fluorometer. Means with s.d. are presented; n = 9-15. In general, photosynthetic rates of flowers vary widely between less than 1 to 170 nmol CO 2 g·1 DW s·1 or 30--,200 µmol CO 2 g·1 Chl s·1, many perennials having lower values than those of annuals (see HEILMEIER & WHALE 1987). Even the CO 2 -assimilation of Lilium anthers at 100 µmol m·2 s·1 represents 73 % of the respective leaf CO 2 -fixation (CLEMENT & AL. 1997a), whereas the CO 2 fixation rate of green Cymbidium flower was only around 10 % of the leaf (DUEKER & ARDIITI 1968). Tab. l summarizes the photosynthetic rates ofdifferent green flowering plant species in comparison to the resp. leaf rates. G. Aschan, H. Pfanz: Non-foliar photosynthesis and its contribution to the ... 7 Table 1: Floral and leaf net photosynthetic rates of green flowering plants. Species Flora! Leaf Author photosynthesis [µmol m·2s·1] Helleborus viridis (Ranunculaceae) 2.3 (sepals) 10.6 own measurements Aciphylla glaucescens (Apiaceae): 11.0 13.5 HOGAN & AL. (1998) spines Helleborus niger (Ranunculaceae) 295 (sepals) 592-741* SALOPEK-SONDI & AL. (2000) Lilium hvb. enchantment (Liliaceae) 2.3 (anther)l.8 (tepals) 3.2 QEMENT & AL. (1997 a: b) Ranunculus adoneus (Ranunculaceae) -3.42 (young) 14.0-18.1 GALEN & AL. (1993) -0.25 (fully expanded) 3.45 (petals abscised) Spiranthes cernua (Orchidaceae) 2.5 (flower), 3.7 (bud) 9.2 ANTLFINGER & WENDEL (1997) * in (µmol 0 2 h·1g·1 DW). Flora! photosynthesis is considered to be an important additional source for assimiJates within usuall y heterotrophic inflorescences and may thus provide a significant po rti on of the C requirement of reproduction. Reproductive structures could gain up to 60 % of their totaJ carbon requirement, either acquired by flora! or fruit photosynthesis ( e.g. BAzzAZ & AL. 1979, WEISS & AL. 1988, MARCELIS & HOFMAN-EJJER 1995). II. Carbon acquisition by non-foliar vegetative organs Non-foliar vegetative photosynthetic organs couJd represent the primary assimilate source, as often realized in stems (NILSEN 1995, PFANZ & AscHAN 2001) and occasionally in roots, e.g. in Jeafless and nearly stemless orchid species (BENZING & AL. 1983, HEW & AL. 1984). Generally characterized by the Jack of Jeaves as well as of stomates, the aerial roots of epiphytes ( orchids, bromeJiads, aroids) and vines, the green pneumatophores of mangroves or the stilt roots of some paJms often contain chlorophyll and exhibit a well deveJoped photosynthetic capability. In epiphytic orchids the chJorophyllous parenchymaJ tissues usually were masked by a spongy whitish Jayer, the ve/amen radicum, but the growing apex of the root is commonJy green. AeriaJ root chJorophyll of some orchid species was found to range between 9 % and 55 % of respective Jeaf Chl contents, proportionateJy up to 89 % reJated to the fresh weight (AscHAN & PFANZ 2003; see aJso BENZING & Orr 1981). The roots of some orchid species are sufficiently autotrophic to either maintain themseJves or contribute substantially to their needs (e.g. Dvcus & KNuosoN 1957). However, most green orchid roots (and stems) show nonet photosynthesis (HEw & AL. 1984; BENZING & PocKMAN 1989), because of their stout structure, their Jack of a reguJated gas exchange and their predominant role for absorption and storage (BENZING & AL. 1983). Regarding these functionaJ properties of roots, the recycling of internally respired CO 2 is considered as the main task of green, photosynthesizing root tissues. Preliminary gas-exchange measurements with aerial roots of two orchid species reveaJed CO 2 refixation rates ranging from 49 % (Doritis pulcherrima coerulea) to 67 % (Vanda spec. data not shown), whereas nonet photosynthesis was detected. In earJy gas-exchange experiments with the Warburg apparatus a reduction of respiratory CO2 evoJution by aeriaJ orchid roots is shown under high illumination (Dvcus & KNuosoN 1957). 8 Acta Biologica Slovenica, 46 (2), 2003 Based on these