Eric P. Hamp CDU 811.163.6: 811.18 Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago THREE BRIEF STUDIES: SLOVENE AND ALBANIAN I. Slovene enajst Bernard Comrie, in his contribution on the Slavic languages to the volume edit­ed by J. Gvozdanovicl (p. 766), reports a fact of particular historical interest. In pre­senting the forms and behavior of the 'teens amongst the numerals' Comrie states that two accentual patterns apply, an oxytone and a recessive, i.e. -najst and VNIT­najst. However, he points out that exceptionally in the case of '11' only enajst the oxy­tone occurs. In the same volume, as it happens, I have mentioned (919-20) my observations2 ofthe IE rule deleting 'l' in complex phrases. It would seem that we may reconstruct enajst as *na(d)es(?)t by this rule, and then only later a »normalizing« e(n)-would have been added. An interesting archaism matching OLith. liekas. Since I am no Anglist I do not know what has been said on this, but contrary to German elf, zwolf (and apparently Speyer Gothic ainlif) English has e/even but twe/ve3. This should point to a post-Verner *lif(V)n, but *tw6lifunder the same rule, preserved in this marginal insular dialect. Jadranka Gvozdanovic ed., lndo-European Numerals. Berlin: Mouton 1992. 2 To the references cited add 'first', ZCP 45, 1992, 85-6. To D. Greene's report (502-4) 1 have some further comment to offer in the pages of Eriu. 3 1 notice the following, which seem surprisingiy inadequate and inattentive. Chambers 1993 (normally compact, sound, and independent) OE en(d)Ie(o)fan: Go ainiif perh. (10 and) one left: Lat. linguere. Merriam-Webster Collegiate 10 (a popuiar reputabie standard) ME enieven < adj. < OE < end--iin + -Ieofan : Ieon 'Iend' : Ioan eif, ON ellifu: LEAVE < Ieven < Irefan (caus.): Iiif'remainder': OHG Ieiban'--+ bieiben, ON Ieifa: Go. -Iaibjan. The mention Iii refers one to Iave2. Of course, in such dictionaries much must be omitted, and not only rich detail; but not the main features of shape and content of the word, while introducing dubious reievance. From the forms cited we may recover the English series: end'Ieofan > en'Ieven (with removaI or reduction of whatever seemed to be end-) > e!'Iefne (by phonetic simplification) > e'Ieven (further reduc­tion) > [J"!svQ.] (modem vaiues). The following reconstructions are then imposed by known comparanda: *en-'Iefan-< *aina-'Iiq,ana (Old English post-Verner intervocalic spirant voicing) ~*aina+'liq,a-na-(Germanic initiaI accent) ~*'Iiq,a­(na-)(+'tehun) (loss of deietion ruie for phantom 10, and survivaI of entai!ed inflexion or suffix) or *'lihJa­: OLith. Iiekas; versus *NumeraI [du.jpl.] + 'lihJ/kwa-(+'10) < *(1-deietion) + Numeral + I(e)ikw-o-+X. The last stage belonged to a more general PIE rule for NPs than just Numeral sequences; 11 is a precious relic. II. Albanian kercas and kercej L V. Orel in treating Alb. kercas 'shout, resound' (1998: 180) subscribes to a rea­sonable conclusion, that we have an early borrowing from Slavic, but his account of the detail is inexact. The affricate c is not the direct reflex of Slavic č. The primary modem result is Alb. s, e.g. porosis