Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 85 - 1, maj 2005 str. 91 - 96 Agrovoc Descriptors: soil, nitrogen, nitrogen content, soil chemistry, soil fertility, fertilizer application soil testing, analytical methods, chemical composition Agris Category Codes: H20, F01, Q04 COBISS code 1.01 Effects of rugose wood and GLRaV-1 on yield of cv. ‘Refošk’ grapevinesa Irma TOMAŽIČ1, Nataša PETROVIČ2, Zora KOROŠEC-KORUZA3 Received October 10, 2004; accepted May 12, 2005. Delo je prispelo 10. oktobra 2005; sprejeto 12. maja, 2005. ABSTRACT The influences of rugose wood (RW) disease and grapevine leafroll associated Closterovirus 1 (GLRaV-1) on yield in grapevine cv. Refošk were studied. Both diseases were shown to reduce the yield. The grape quality expressed as sugar degree (°Oe) was higher in GLRaV-1 infected vines probably due to lower yield and consequent early ripeness. 18 % of plants with RW symptoms on the rootstock part of the vine have died 10 years after planting. Key words: grapevine, selection, grapevine leafroll associated virus 1, rugose wood, yield. IZVLEČEK VPLIV BOLEZNI RAZBRAZDANJA LESA TER GLRaV-1 NA PRIDELEK SORTE 'REFOŠK'b Proučevan je bil vpliv bolezni razbrazdanja lesa ter virusnega zvijanja listov vinske trte (Grapevine leafroll associated Closterovirus 1, GLRaV-1) na pridelek sorte 'Refošk'. Tako GLRaV-1 kot bolezen razbrazdanja lesa vplivata na zmanjšanje pridelka. Kakovost grozdja, izražena v °Oe stopinjah sladkorja, je bila boljša pri trsih okuženih z GLRaV-1, verjetno tudi zaradi manjšega pridelka in posledično hitrejšega dozorevanja grozdja okuženih trsov. 18 % trsov z boleznijo razbrazdanja lesa, izraženo na podlagah okuženih trsov, je propadlo že 10 let po sajenju. Ključne besede: vinska trta, selekcija, virusno zvijanje listov vinske trte 1, razbrazdanje lesa, pridelek. a The article is a part of master thesis, supervisor Ph. D. Assistant Professor Zora Korošec-Koruza 1 Ph. D. Nova Gorica Polytechnic, Vipavska 13, p.p. 301, SI-5000, Nova Gorica, irma.tomazic@p-ng.si 2 Ph. D. National Institute of Biology, Večna pot 111, SI-1000 Ljubljana, natasa.petrovic@nib.si 3 Assist. Prof., Ph. D. University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Agronomy, Jamnikarjeva 101, p.p. 2995, SI-1111, Ljubljana, zora.korosec@bf.uni-lj.si b Prispevek je del magistrske naloge, mentorica doc. dr. Zora Korošec-Koruza Acta agriculturae Slov 92 enica, 85 - 1, maj 2005 1 INTRODUCTION Virus infections may cause significant negative consequences for the grapevine yield. The impact of virus infection is not easy to predict as the type and severity of symptoms vary with the virus, the variety, scion/rootstock combination, and the environmental conditions (Mannini et al., 1999; Walter and Martelli 1997). Leafroll is an extremely widespread disease that induces typical and often intense symptoms in V. vinifera, but is latent in almost all American Vitis species and their hybrids. In European grapevine varieties, disease symptoms consist of downward rolling of leaf blades, accompanied by a reddish or yellowish discolouration of the intervenial tissues in red-berried and white-berried varieties, respectively. All leafroll-associated viruses (GLRaVs) belong to the family Closteroviridae. Heretofore, ten serologically different GLRaVs viruses have been described (Digiaro et al., 1999; Boscia et al., 1995; Marteli, 2003). Although the number of newly discovered viruses is increasing, their impact on yield has not been evaluated for each individual virus. There are only the general reports describing the economic importance of the overall leafroll disease (Walter and Martelli; 1997). Knowing the impact of each individual virus on grapevines is very important when we are taking decision about the opportunity and the standards of sanitary selection (Martins and Carneiro, 1997). In case of GLRaV-3, all authors agreed that the leafroll disease caused yield losses due to a decrease in the plant vigor, sugar content of musts, and increase of titratable acidity. On the contrary, little is known about the influence of GLRaV-1. Another very important graft transmissible disease is a rugose wood (RW) complex. RW designate a group of distinct disorders, mainly characterized by the development of pitting and grooving in the woody cylinder. The disease may be present as a latent stage on Vitis vinifera cultivars and only manifest itself following grafting on to American rootstocks. The severity of symptoms varies according to the variety of rootstock. RW wood has been reported from almost all grape-growing regions of the world. Cultivar ‘Refošk’ is showing high RW and leafroll disease incidence. ELISA analysis and visual inspection of potential mother plants revealed 37 % GLRaV-1 positive and 15 % RW positive vines, respectively. These vines were included in a study to assess the impact of RW and GLRaV-1 on yield. 2 MATERIAL AND METHODS Plant material: The trial was conduced in the 18 years old vineyard of cv. ‘Refošk’, located in Komen (Karst region of Western Slovenia). The planting materials were 76 blocks of potential mother plants of cv. ‘Refošk’ grafted on standard SO4 rootstock. Vines were trained on double Guyot with 25 buds/vine. The vineyard was permanently green covered. GLRaV-1 was tested using antisera produced by Bioreba (Switzerland) in indirect standard DAS ELISA procedure (Clark and Adams, 1977). All of the 1680 vines from selection vineyard were visually inspected for rugose wood symptoms with unknown etiology. TOMAŽIČ, I. in sod.: Effects of rugose wood and GLRaV-1 on yield of cv. ‘Refošk’… 93 Chemical analysis of grapes In the vintage of 1998 the grape sugar, titratable acid, and the weight of 100 berries have been measured for each of the 76 potential elite group. We further measured the number of clusters per vine and the crop per vine for 181 plants. The data were statistically analyzed using STATGRAPHIC 5.0 software. Analysis of variance was used to test for significant differences among the means; furthermore, Sheffe's multiple range test was used to determine which means are significantly different. 3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The chemical and yield analyses revealed that RW had no significant influence on sugar content and berry weight in fruits of cv. ‘Refošk’. However, the total acid content is significantly higher in grapes of the vines showing no RW. The later, from a viticulturist point of view, means that these grapes are not ripe yet and are able to accumulate more sugar in a proper time as the diseased vines that show RW symptoms. During the process of ripening, the acid content is decreasing while the sugar content is increasing accordingly. Therefore, high acid content simply means that the ripening period has not ended (Figure 1). The number of clusters per vine and the cluster weight are significantly higher in vines showing no RW, resulting in a higher crop per vine. Notably, among vines, which showed pits on the rootstock, recognized as RW, 18 % of the vines died only eight years after planting, which is the first report of this kind of RW impact (Table 1). Reynolds at al. (1997) reported that Rupestris stem pitting, which is believed to be one of the components of the RW disease complex, had no major impact on grapevine growth and yield, but may advance fruit maturity in terms of titratable acidity and pH. The results of the present study confirmed some of these effects, but showed more pronounced damaging effects of RW on quality of grapes than reported previously. 85 83 81 79 77 75 73 71 69 67 65 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Total acids (g/L) Figure 1: The influence of rugose wood disease upon the yield of cv. ‘Refošk’, Komen, Slovenia 1998. o no symptoms • stem pitting - - Linear (no symptoms) Linear (stem pitting) y = -2 88x y = -2.47x + 108.69 • -D nO. w 0 • 0 * °0U 0 °° * * * 0 10 11 12 13 14 Total acids (g/L) 15 16 17 Figure 2: The influence of GLRaV-1 upon the yield of cv. ‘Refošk’, Komen, Slovenia 1998. TOMAŽIČ, I. in sod.: Effects of rugose wood and GLRaV-1 on yield of cv. ‘Refošk’… 95 Table 2: The influence of GLRaV-1 upon the yield of cv. ‘Refošk’, Komen, Slovenia, 1998. Virus status Sugar (°Oe) Titratable acidity (g/L) 100 Berry % Dead Yield/vine Clusters weight (g) vines (kg) /vine 1 Cluster weight (g) GLRaV-1 (-) 73.0 13.5* 303.0 3.53 7.78* 28.8* 265.4 GLRaV-1 (+) 78.6* 12.3 304.1 8.59 5.11 20.4 247.2 * - significant a t the p<0.0 5 Furthermore, we assessed the grape yield loss per hectar (ha) per growing area, for diseased and healthy vines. The calculations were made from data obtained for the collection vineyard in 1998. We found out that the yield per hectar of the vineyard with 100 % of vines infected with GLRaV-1 would give 36 % less crop per hectar, and the yield in vineyard infected with RW disease would be decreased by 34 % (Table 3). Notably, the later would be mostly a direct consequence of the high incidence of dead vines. Table 3: Calculations for yield per growing area in hectars (yield/ha) comparatively for diseased and healthy vines cv. ‘Refošk’, Komen, Slovenia, 1998. Sanitary status % of dead vines Yield/vine (kg) Planting density 3000 vines/ha No. dead vines/ha Yield/hectar (kg) No rugose wood symptoms 2.51 7.91 75 23134 Rugose wood symptoms on rootstock 17.85 5.95 536 14662 Rugose wood symptoms on scion 7.61 5.73 228 15882 GLRaV-1 (-) 3.53 7.78 106 22516 GLRaV-1 (+) 8.57 5.11 258 14342 These data are comparable with data reported from Woodham et al (1984) who demonstrated that leafroll induced 35 % reductions of yield. Similarly reported of yield reduction due leafroll infection McCarty et al. (1989), Diagaro et al. (1999) and Garau et al. (1997). According to Garau (1985) and Teliz et al. (1980) RW disease cause 20 % to 70 % crop losses, whereas Rynolds et al. (1997) reported that Rupestris stem pitting virus, which is considered to be component of RW complex, had no major impact on grapevine yield. The differences are expected since the rugose wood is complex disease and different viruses could be involved in. The results indicate that GLRaV-1 alone has different influence on the yield than GLRaV-3, or GLRaV-1 in mixed infection with GVA. GLRaV-1 infection seems to improve the quality of the must, which was found to be only on the account of the high yield reduction. GLRaV-1 and RW were both shown to cause yield reduction in Acta agriculturae Slov 96 enica, 85 - 1, maj 2005 cv. ‘Refošk’. In case of RW, this is the first report where the yield loss was shown to be a direct consequence of dying of the vines. 5 REFERENCES Boscia, D., Greif C, Gugerli P., Martelli G.P., Walter B., Gonsalves D. 1995. Nomenclature of grapevine leafroll-associated putative closteroviruses. Vitis 34:171-175. Cabaleiro, C, Segura A., Garćia-Berrios J.J. 1999. Effect of grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 on the physiology and must of Vitis vinifera L. cv Albari*o following contamination in the field. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 50:40-44. Clark, M.F. Adams A.N.. 1977. Characteristics of microplate method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. J. Gen. Virol. 34:475-483. Digiaro, M., Garau R., Savino V. 1999. Closteroviruses and grapevine diseases: a review of the situation before the establishment of the network. In: Proceedings of the Mediterranean Network on Grapevine Closteroviruses 1992-1997 and the Viruses and Virus-like Diseases of the Grapevine: Bibliographic Report, 1985-1997. G P. Martelli and M. Digiaro Eds.). pp. 67-81. Tecnomack, Bari. Garau, R., Cugusi, M., Dore, M., Prota, U. 1985. Investigations on the yield of 'Monica' and 'Italia' vines affected by legno riccio (stem pitting).- Proc. 8th Meet. ICVG, Bari, Phytopath. medit., 24, s. 64-67. Garau, R., Padilla, V., Rumbos, I., Walter, B., Savino, V. 1997. Indexing for the identification of virus and virus-like diseases of the grapevine.- V: Sanitary selection of the grapevine. Paris, INRA, s. 97-117. Mannini, F., Argamante N., Credi R. 1999. Contribution of virus infections to clonal variability of some Vitis vinifera L. cultivars. Bulletin de l'O.I.V. 817-818:145-160. Martins, A., Carneiro L.C. 1997. Methods for the evaluation of virus effects on grapevines. In: Proceedings of the 12th Meeting of ICVG. pp. 159-160. Lisbon, Portugal. Marteli, GP. 2003. Grapevine virology highlights 2000-2003. In: Proceedings of the 14th Meeting of ICVG. pp. 3-10. Locorotondo (Bari), Italy. McCarthy, M.G., Cirami R.M., Van Velsen R.J. 1989. Virus thermotherapy effects on the performance of a Muscadelle selection. Vitis 28:13-19. Reynolds, A.W., Lanterman W.S., Wardle D.A. 1997. Yield and berry composition of five Vitis cultivars as affected by Rupestris stem pitting virus. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 48:449-458. Téliz, D., Valle P., Goheen A.C., Luevano S. 1980. Grape corky bark and stem pitting in Mexico. I. Occurrence, natural spread, distribution, effect on yield and evaluation of symptoms in 128 grape cultivars. In: Proceedings of the 7th Meeting of ICVG. A. J. McGinnis (Ed.). pp. 51-64. Niagara Falls, Canada. Walter, B., Martelli G.P. 1997. Clonal and sanitary selection of the grapevine. In: Sanitary selection of the grapevine. B. Walter (Ed.). pp 43-95. INRA, Paris. Woodham R.C., Antcliff A.J., Krake L.R., Taylor R.H. 1984. Yield differences between Sultana clones related to virus status and genetic factors. Vitis 23:73-83.