c e p s Journal | V ol.12 | N
o
3 | Y ear 2022 13
The Inclusion of Differentiation in Literacy Lessons 
in the First and Second Grades of Slovenian Primary 
School 
Jasna Švajger
1
• In the modern educational process, teachers adapt lessons to the stu -
dent’s individual abilities, prior knowledge, interests and social skills. 
The present study, whose aim is to examine the inclusion of differentia -
tion in literacy lessons in the first and second grades of Slovenian pri -
mary schools, was carried out on a smaller scale ( N = 79). It aims to 
determine the views of first- and second-grade primary school teachers 
on differentiation, and to find out how differentiation takes place in lit -
eracy lessons and which factors affect student performance in class. The 
results show that the inclusion of differentiation in literacy lessons is 
present in the entire initial literacy teaching process, and that Slovenian 
teachers undergo regular training and professional development courses 
in this area, thus contributing to the educational success of students and 
affecting their personal growth and development. T eachers estimate that 
the intertwining of individual abilities, family environment, engagement 
in co-curricular activities and well-developed social skills represents a 
key factor in student success. It was expected that internal differentia -
tion would be more effective than external differentiation. Surprisingly, 
however, teachers report that heterogeneous groups do not enhance 
educational efficiency.
 Keywords: differentiation, lessons, student, teacher, teaching literacy 
1 Drska Primary School Novo mesto, Slovenia; jasna.svajger@os-drska.si.
varia
doi: 10.26529/cepsj.1042

14 the inclusion of differentiation in literacy lessons in the first and second ...
Vključevanje diferenciacije pri pouku opismenjevanja v 
prvem in drugem razredu osnovne šole
Jasna Švajger
• V sodobnem vzgojno-izobraževalnem procesu učitelji prilagajajo pouk 
učenčevim individualnim zmožnostim, predznanju, interesom in soci -
alnim spretnostim. Raziskavo, katere namen je bil preučiti vključevanje 
diferenciacije pri pouku opismenjevanja v prvem in drugem razredu 
slovenske osnovne šole, smo izvedli v manjšem obsegu (N = 79). Ci -
lji raziskave so bili ugotoviti, kakšna so stališča učiteljev, ki poučujejo 
v 1. in 2. razredu osnovne šole, do diferenciacije. Želeli smo izvedeti, 
kako poteka diferenciacija pri pouku opismenjevanja in kateri dejavniki 
vplivajo na uspešnost učencev pri pouku. Rezultati so pokazali, da je 
vključevanje diferenciacije v pouk opismenjevanja prisotno v celotnem 
procesu začetnega opismenjevanja in da se slovenski učitelji redno izo -
bražujejo in izpopolnjujejo na tem področju ter s tem vplivajo na uspe -
šnost učencev na učnem in osebnostnem področju. Učitelji ocenjujejo, 
da so med glavnimi dejavniki za uspešnost učencev preplet individualne 
zmožnosti, družinskega okolja, vključenosti učencev v šolsko dejavnost 
in razvite socialne spretnosti. Pričakovana je ugotovitev, da je notra -
nja diferenciacija učinkovitejša od zunanje, presenetljiva pa je ugoto -
vitev, da heterogene skupine po mnenju učiteljev ne prispevajo k večji 
učinkovitosti.
 Ključne besede: diferenciacija, opismenjevanje, pouk, učenec, učitelj

c e p s Journal | V ol.12 | N
o
3 | Y ear 2022 15
Introduction
In 1996, the Primary School Act was adopted in Slovenia (Official Jour -
nal of the Republic of Slovenia, No. 81/06 – official consolidated text, 102/07, 
107/10, 87/11, 40/12 – Financial Balance Act, 63/13 and 46/16 – Organisation 
and Financing of Education Act), which states in Article 40 that teachers are 
obliged to differentiate lessons and other types of organised work in accordance 
with the students’ abilities. This applies to all primary school students (grades 
1 to 9). Differentiation was introduced into teaching after the Second World 
War, in 1958, with the abolition of the dualistic system and the introduction of 
eight-year, and later nine-year, primary school (Blažič et al., 2003). In the 1970s, 
internal differentiation and individualisation also began to be implemented in 
practice, followed by flexible differentiation, which was introduced slightly later 
(Strmčnik, 2001).  
The present article focuses on differentiation in literacy lessons in Slove -
nian schools. The Slovenian legislation stipulates that a child has to be enrolled 
in school in the calendar year in which s/he reaches the age of six. If a child is 
not yet mature enough to enter school, school enrolment may be delayed for 
one year based on a proposal submitted by parents or healthcare services (Of -
ficial Journal of the Republic of Slovenia, No. 81/06 – official consolidated text, 
102/07, 107/10, 87/11, 40/12 – Financial Balance Act, 63/13 and 46/16 – Organisa -
tion and Financing of Education Act).
Early literacy lessons – that is, learning the alphabet, acquisition of read -
ing and writing techniques – take place in the first and second grades of pri -
mary school, whereas in the third grade, literacy lessons are focused on con -
solidation (Primary School Curriculum: Slovenian Language. Syllabus, 2018). 
During the period of early literacy lessons, the foundations for further 
reading and writing lessons are laid. Due to the large differences between stu -
dents upon entering school, it is essential for teachers to be aware of the impor -
tance of individualisation and differentiation, which should be used in class on a 
regular basis. This is precisely why the present article aims to analyse the situation 
in the field of differentiation in literacy lessons in Slovenian primary schools. 
Overview of the literature on differentiation 
Tomlinson (2004) defined differentiation as a teaching concept that en -
sures that the knowledge obtained by the student corresponds with the student’ s 
academic readiness or his/her ability level and interests, as well as the learning 
techniques that prove to be most suitable for the student. Differentiation is a 

16 the inclusion of differentiation in literacy lessons in the first and second ...
teaching concept that takes into account the talents and learning styles of the 
individual (Morgan, 2014). Differentiation techniques have been designed to 
satisfy students’ needs, ensuring that students consequently develop certain 
virtues such as responsibility, cooperation and mutual assistance (Grimes & 
Stevens, 2009). Strmčnik (2001) defines differentiation as an organisational 
measure used by the teacher to guide and manage students in accordance with 
their specific differences. Students are split into homogeneous or heterogene -
ous learning groups, either temporary or permanent, in order to achieve better 
social and individual educational results by adapting objectives, content and di -
dactic-methodical teaching concepts. Differentiation begins with the teacher’s 
reflection on the content and teaching methods, as well as on the assessment of 
knowledge or progress and the student’s understanding. During a working day, 
students can be split into different groups according to their needs and abilities. 
In schools around the world, the Response to Intervention (RTI) dif -
ferentiated approach has been introduced in classrooms. Within this approach, 
students are placed in three different tiers according to their abilities. Students 
placed in tier 1 are provided with high-quality lessons that are not differentiated; 
in tier 2, differentiated work takes place in small groups; and in tier 3, students 
acquire basic knowledge and need extra support and assistance (Jefferson at al., 
2016). The latter is often provided outside the framework of regular classes, in 
the form of remedial classes, individual learning support and additional profes -
sional assistance (Pečjak & Potočnik, 2011). The teacher monitors the student’s 
progress and identifies his/her interests, and when tier 1 knowledge has been 
reached, the student is moved to a higher level (tier), which will facilitate his/
her further progress (Policastro et al., 2019).
Modern education aims to develop social, emotional, moral and intel -
lectual abilities that allow students to become integrated into the community 
(Stropnik Kunič, 2012). In differentiated learning, the teacher has to take into 
account the differences between students that emerge as a result of their in -
dividual abilities, which include intellectual and verbal abilities, and due to 
their family environment and other factors, such as social skills and student 
participation in co-curricular activities (Marjanovič Umek, 2007). In Slove -
nian schools, migrant children and Roma children represented a special group 
of students. In their case, language barriers should be taken into account as 
the major obstacle faced by students in literacy learning (Klopčič, 2013; Knez, 
2009).

c e p s Journal | V ol.12 | N
o
3 | Y ear 2022 17
Differentiation strategies in literacy lessons 
The teacher’s role is to adjust learning objectives in accordance with 
student abilities, and to create a learning environment that promotes students’ 
progress and success (Waldron & McLeskey, 2001). Tomlinson (2003) includes 
differentiation in literacy lessons in three different ways: the use of reading ma -
terials at different levels; preparation of literacy centres containing activities 
with certain adjustments that are in line with the abilities and interests of stu -
dents in a certain class; and the establishment of a centre where the teacher can 
work individually with a student who still has knowledge gaps.  
Literacy teaching is defined in the literature as a process that involves 
all four communication skills, i.e., listening, speaking, reading and writing 
(Grginič, 2005; Haughbrook et al., 2017). Pečjak and Potočnik (2011) define it as 
a perceptual decoding process that includes: 1) letter recognition, resulting in 
the ability to visually distinguish and use support keys in decoding, which in -
cludes a grapho-phonetic or phonetic-letter key, a semantic key and a syntactic 
key; and 2) phonological awareness, which includes phonemic analysis and the 
ability to distinguish different phonemes. 
The 2018 updated syllabus for the Slovenian language states that early 
literacy lessons take place individually, gradually and systematically through -
out the first educational period (students aged 6 to 8), not only in Slovenian 
language but also in other subjects (Primary School Curriculum. Slovenian 
Language. Syllabus 2018).
The student population in primary school is very diverse, and the work 
therefore needs to be differentiated. However, it is precisely this diversity and 
the variety of student needs that may result in the same teaching strategies not 
suiting all students (Puzio et al., 2020). The teacher must therefore know his/her 
students well, formulate clear goals, take into account different student abilities, 
and plan the teaching materials according to the students’ needs and interests. 
In order to accomplish the syllabus goals and objectives, the teacher must be 
flexible and take into account the level of difficulty of the teaching material and 
its compliance with the students’ development level and abilities. In the light of 
the above, the International Reading Association identified differentiation as a 
core teaching competence (International Reading Association, 2000). 
The work of Arquette (2007) contains some suggestions for the suc -
cessful implementation of differentiation in literacy lessons that could be also 
appropriate in Slovenian classes. The author suggests that teachers should es -
tablish classroom centres for various activities that can increase student mo -
tivation and engagement in literacy learning. The Reading Centre should be 

18 the inclusion of differentiation in literacy lessons in the first and second ...
equipped with materials that are appealing to students (e.g., fairy tales, comics, 
picture books) and provide reading tasks (e.g., reading with a friend, writing 
down questions and unknown words). The Big Book Centre should be sepa -
rated from the Reading Centre, as it will allow students to undertake tasks that 
apply to certain books only (e.g., reading aloud to a classmate). In the Listen -
ing Centre, students have access to listening devices and can listen to various 
texts. Post-listening activities should be well thought out and should keep stu -
dents active and engaged. The Reading and Listening Centres should encourage 
students with reading difficulties to make progress using the applications that 
motivate them to read, including sound recordings with correct pronunciation, 
which is extremely beneficial for students. The Writing Centre is designed to 
improve students’ writing skills. Students write letters to their classmates and 
can also practise writing on a computer. In the ABC/Word Study Centre, stu -
dents work on letter recognition, practise writing, and develop visual and audi -
tory perception.
Differentiation in literacy lessons in Slovenia
The Slovenian Language Syllabus (2018) states that students are to reach 
their goals through activities adapted to their age, their communicative, cogni -
tive and imaginative abilities, and their experience and interests, which means 
that the teacher is obliged to plan lessons that use differentiated instruction (DI) 
to suit the student’s distinct aptitudes. Differentiation has been present in the 
Slovenian school system for a long time. Research findings (Pečjak & Potočnik, 
2011; Žalik, 1988) in the field of differentiation have shown that the teacher’s 
role is to perceive students’ abilities upon their entry into school; rather than 
viewing students as equal, the teacher should allow them to make progress at 
their own pace. Differentiation requires teachers to be flexible and is very time 
consuming. Consequently, teachers often wonder how to plan for differentia -
tion successfully. It is important that the teacher takes into account the charac -
teristics and abilities of the student that are necessary for the development of 
reading and writing skills, while also seeking to optimise the development of 
the student’s abilities. In doing so, teachers are often confronted with factors 
that may hinder differentiation, e.g., the number of students in the class, re -
strictions and regulations, as well as fear that internal differentiation may turn 
into external differentiation. The most effective model of differentiation, also in 
Slovenia, is the RTI model (Pečjak & Potočnik, 2011), which separates teaching 
into three tiers: 
In tier 1, the lessons are intended for all students. The lessons must be 

c e p s Journal | V ol.12 | N
o
3 | Y ear 2022 19
of high quality and should involve differentiated instruction and opportunities 
to promote the development of students’ interests. Within this tier, the teacher 
identifies students struggling with reading and writing gaps, who therefore 
need extra help. In this regard, it would be good for teachers to have a table 
with goals, where they would mark the status of each student with regard to the 
attainment of their objectives. Students may have problems in different areas 
and each student needs support and assistance (Yssel et al. 2014). 
In tier 2, the lessons are held in smaller groups and student progress is 
monitored more often than in tier 1. The teacher uses student progress data to 
prepare an individualised programme for each student and to plan the transi -
tion from one tier to another. In tier 2, the teacher’s duty is to assist students in 
performing tasks at the appropriate level of difficulty (Adams et al., 2012). Tier 2 
work is limited to 30 minutes per day. It is performed in such a way that the teach -
er assists a group of students with reading and writing difficulties, while other 
groups are left to work on their tasks independently (Pečjak & Potočnik, 2011).
Tier 3 comprises students who need more support and assistance than 
tier 2 can offer. Lessons can be based on group work or individual work, de -
pending on the students’ needs. 
Tier 3 lessons are even more systematic and focused on the individual 
student. This tier comprises students with serious reading and writing difficul -
ties. Lessons are usually held outside regular school hours. The RTI differentia -
tion model proves effective and suitable for students with reading and writing 
difficulties as well as for high-performing students (ibid.).
Research problem and research questions
The study aims to examine the inclusion of differentiation in the first 
and second grades of primary school in Slovenia. In her doctoral dissertation, 
Pečar (2018) deals in detail with differentiation in general as well as teachers’ 
attitudes towards differentiation. This paper presents the results of a small-scale 
study concerned with differentiation in literacy lessons. The study aims to es -
tablish the attitudes of teachers of first- and second-grade students in primary 
school towards differentiation in literacy lessons. The aim was to find out the 
ways in which differentiation takes place in literacy lessons, and to determine 
which students are provided with differentiated learning. We examined which 
factors, according to teachers, affect students’ performance in literacy lessons, 
how the inclusion of differentiation affects literacy lessons in various teaching 
strategies, and the correlation between the teacher’s attitude towards differen -
tiation in literacy lessons and its frequency in various teaching strategies. 

20 the inclusion of differentiation in literacy lessons in the first and second ...
The research questions were as follows: 
1. How important is the inclusion of differentiation in literacy lessons for 
teachers, and which elements of differentiation do teachers consider im -
portant or unimportant? 
2. Which differentiation methods are used by teachers in literacy lessons 
and which students are, with regard to their abilities, most frequently 
provided with differentiation? 
3. In the opinion of teachers, which factors have the greatest impact on 
student performance in literacy lessons? 
4. In the view of teachers, how does the inclusion of differentiation affect 
literacy lessons in various teaching strategies? What is the correlation 
between the teacher’s attitude towards differentiation in literacy lessons 
and the frequency of differentiation in various teaching strategies? 
Hypotheses:
H1:  Teachers consider differentiation in literacy lessons to be very impor -
tant, as it significantly affects the development of students’ personality 
traits, social skills and learning abilities. 
H2:  In literacy lessons, teachers differentiate their work by using various 
teaching methods and strategies, and it is those students who deviate 
from the average population who are most commonly provided with 
differentiated instruction.
H3:  According to teachers, student performance in literacy lessons is affect -
ed by students’ intellectual abilities, their home environment and social 
skills. 
H4:  Teachers maintain that different teaching strategies significantly affect 
student performance, while also having a powerful impact on student 
motivation and self-confidence. The teacher’s attitude towards differ -
entiation affects the frequency of differentiation in various forms of 
teaching. 
Method
Sample
Due to the fact that, according to the syllabus, early literacy lessons take 
place in the first and second grades of primary school, teachers who taught 
first- and second-grade students in the 2019/20 school year were invited to par -
ticipate in the survey. A total of 79 participants
2
 decided to take part in the 
2  The results cannot be generalised to the entire population.

c e p s Journal | V ol.12 | N
o
3 | Y ear 2022 21
survey, of which 78 (98.7%) were female and 1 (1.3%) was male. Precisely 48 par -
ticipants (60.8%) taught the first grade and 31 (39.2%) taught the second grade. 
Participation in the research study was voluntary and the responses were 
anonymous. 
Research instrument 
For the purpose of this research study, an online questionnaire was 
created. It was based on the literature on the subject of differentiation, which 
had been previously studied and examined. The online survey questionnaire 
comprises questions that are used to either confirm or reject the previously 
stated hypotheses. The questionnaire contains the demographic data needed 
to present the sample and provide data analysis. The survey questionnaire en -
compasses five-point (the first part of the questionnaire) and three-point (the 
second part of the questionnaire) Likert scales, which are used to measure the 
respondents’ opinions about a given subject. The table of the five-point scale 
assessing attitudes and opinions contains a variety of statements about the 
inclusion of differentiation in literacy lessons. The survey participants had to 
assess the relevance of each statement related to the implementation of their 
lessons.
3
 The three-point-scale table also contains statements about the inclu -
sion of differentiation in literacy lessons. The participants had to evaluate the 
extent to which each statement pertains to the implementation of their lessons.
4
 
The survey questionnaire filled out by the teachers also contains the following 
open-ended question: “Considering the results in your class, what are the posi -
tive effects of differentiation?”
Research design
On the basis of the literature and subsequent research questions, we 
prepared a survey questionnaire for teachers who taught the first or second 
grade of primary school in the 2019/20 school year. The survey questionnaire 
was distributed to teachers through an online portal in one phase only. The 
questionnaire was completed by 79 teachers. The data obtained was transferred 
from the web collector to Excel, and later to an SPSS document. The survey 
questionnaire showed a high degree of reliability, as the Cronbach’s alpha coef -
ficient is .92 for the first part of the questionnaire and .81 for the second part. 
The third part of the questionnaire comprised an open-ended question, which 
was analysed by means of a descriptive research method. 
3 The set of statements covers a range of options that vary from one extreme to another: 1 – 
unimportant, 2 – of little importance, 3 – moderately important, 4 – important, 5 – very important.
4 The assessment of statements covers a range of options: 1 – agree, 2 – partly agree, 3 – disagree.

22 the inclusion of differentiation in literacy lessons in the first and second ...
Results and Discussion
The survey results bring to light the responses to the research questions. 
The first research question aims to determine the views of first- and sec -
ond-grade primary school teachers on differentiation in literacy lessons. Their 
responses were obtained in the first part of the questionnaire, where they as -
sessed the importance of various statements, as well as in the third part of the 
questionnaire, where the respondents had to provide answers to an open-ended 
question on the positive effects of differentiation.
Data analysis shows that the teachers regard differentiation in literacy 
lessons as very important ( f = 43; 54.4%) or important ( f = 31; 39.2%), which is 
also confirmed by the data for the statement regarding the time spent on pre -
paring differentiation strategies in literacy lessons. The majority of the teachers 
answered that they spend a lot of time on differentiation ( f = 36; 45.6%) or that 
this statement is at least partly true ( f = 41; 51.9%). It can therefore be concluded 
that particular attention is given to this teaching technique by the teachers.   
The third part of the questionnaire contains an open-ended question on 
the positive effects of differentiation in literacy lessons. The results show that 
most teachers focus their attention on the individual student, while the positive 
impact of differentiation on students represents a great professional success for 
teachers. This demonstrates that there is a connection between students and 
teachers, which is consistent with the findings of T omlinson (2003), who claims 
that teacher-student relationships play a key role in the planning and imple -
mentation of differentiated teaching. 
When asked about the positive effects of differentiation, most of the re -
spondents stated that students’ self-esteem is boosted during differentiated lit -
eracy lessons. As students progress from lower to higher taxonomic task levels, 
they gain a sense of success and accomplishment. 
The survey questionnaire shows that teachers consider the element of 
differentiation to be very important ( M = 4.58). The teachers surveyed believe 
that students are more motivated to work if literacy lessons are based on dif -
ferentiation and if they are performed in a dynamic way, characterised by group 
work and subject content that is consistent with students’ abilities, interests and 
needs. The first part of the questionnaire examines the importance of student 
motivation regarding literacy lessons, and the third part explores the situation 
in the respondents’ classes. It was established that the correlation between the 
results of the survey statements is statistically significant ( p = 0.038), which 
suggests that the teacher should ensure additional student motivation in lit -
eracy lessons, providing s/he finds it important. 

c e p s Journal | V ol.12 | N
o
3 | Y ear 2022 23
The vast majority of teachers assessed the adaptation of lessons to stu -
dents’ abilities as important (the first part of the survey questionnaire) ( M = 
4.54). They also assessed as important the fulfilment of student needs ( M = 4.35) 
and the adjustment of lessons to student interests ( M = 3.67). 
The surveyed teachers devote a great deal of attention to the didactic-
methodological way of teaching, which they consider very important in their 
work ( M = 4.41). They also listed some interesting teaching strategies that may 
increase student interest in reading and writing: the use of the phonomimic 
method of teaching alphabet letters, learning letters through songs and rhymes, 
and learning by movement. When executing these activities, the teachers are 
autonomous and they find it important to adjust the learning content ( M = 
3.99) and goals ( M = 4.00) in literacy lessons for the benefit of their students. 
The teachers also listed some other elements of differentiation that they con -
sider important in literacy lessons: the development of responsibility ( M = 32) 
and independence ( M = 4.48), and encouraging students to help and assist each 
other ( M = 4.44). The teachers stated that all of these elements represent a posi -
tive outcome of differentiation in literacy lessons in their teaching practice. 
The second research question was intended to check which differentia -
tion methods are used in literacy lessons in practice, and which students are 
most frequently provided with a differentiated teaching approach. 
The response to the first research question exposed some of the teach -
ing methods used by teachers while giving lessons (the phonomimic method, 
learning through rhymes and songs, learning by movement). In addition to 
teaching methods, we were also interested in teaching strategies used in dif -
ferentiated literacy lessons. We wanted to find out which teaching strategies are 
most frequently used by teachers in literacy lessons. 
Table 1
Teaching strategies most frequently used by teachers in literacy lessons 
Statements
True Partly true Not true Total
f f % f f % f f % f f %
In literacy lessons, I most frequently use the 
frontal teaching method.
3 3.8 51 64.6 25 31.6 79 100.0
My literacy lessons are most frequently 
based on group work activities, with all 
groups having the same task.  
0 0.0 46 58.2 33 41.8 79 100.0
My literacy lessons are most frequently 
based on group work activities, with each 
group working on tasks that are adjusted to 
the students’ abilities.
28 35.4 50 63.3 1 1.3 79 100.0

24 the inclusion of differentiation in literacy lessons in the first and second ...
The results presented in Table 1 illustrate that, in most cases, literacy les -
sons are rather diverse. The teachers use the following three types of teaching 
strategies in class: frontal teaching, groupwork with all groups doing the same 
tasks, and groupwork where the tasks are adjusted to individual students and 
their abilities. Each of these strategies plays an important role in the individual 
stages of literacy lessons, and it is important not to favour one strategy over oth -
ers: they need to be given equal importance and should be intertwined. 
Only 3 teachers (3.8%) most frequently use the frontal teaching strategy 
in literacy classes, while this is partly true for 51 teachers (64.6%). Some teachers 
stated that they perform the frontal teaching strategy mainly in the introductory 
part of the lesson – e.g., singing a song related to a certain letter of the alphabet 
– and in the final part, when they revise the subject matter covered during the les -
son. The results show that group work with all groups working on the same task 
is the least frequently used teaching strategy in literacy lessons. The respondents 
stated in their answers that this teaching strategy is used primarily to assess and 
evaluate their students’ existing knowledge. The activities that the majority of the 
teachers (28 respondents or 35.4%) tend to use most frequently are group work 
activities adapted to the students’ abilities. With the exception of one teacher, the 
other respondents evaluated this statement as partly true. The teachers maintain 
that the group work method is the most effective in the consolidation stage, when 
reading and writing skills are reinforced. By means of the listed teaching meth -
ods, differentiation can be performed in all three tiers of the RTI model. Tier 
3 can be additionally strengthened by using forms of assistance outside regular 
school hours, such as remedial classes (for low-performing students) and supple -
mentary lessons (for high-performing students). Are literacy lessons included in 
this type of extra help and assistance as well?
Table 2
The inclusion of literacy lessons in remedial and supplementary classes 
Statement
True Partly true Not true Total
f f % f f % f f % f f %
I often teach literacy in remedial classes. 45 57.0 21 26.6 13 16.5 79 100.0
I often teach literacy in supplementary 
lessons. 
25 31.6 33 41.8 21 26.6 79 100.0
Table 2 shows that academically weak students are more likely to 
be placed in tier 3. A study by Jožef (2019) explains why teachers do not fo -
cus so much on developing communication skills in supplementary classes, 

c e p s Journal | V ol.12 | N
o
3 | Y ear 2022 25
demonstrating that teachers conducting supplementary classes mostly focus on 
preparing their students for competitions and therefore seek to improve stu -
dent performance in mathematics. We are very critical of this argument, as the 
development of communication skills represents the foundation for developing 
skills in other areas. 
Table 3
Students who are, with regard to their abilities, provided with differentiated 
instruction
Statement
True Partly true Not true Total
f f % f f % f f % f f %
Academically weak students 60 75.9 19 24.1 0 .0 79 100.0
High-performing students 55 69.6 24 30.4 0 .0 79 100.0
Average students 49 62.0 30 38.0 0 .0 79 100.0
Table 3 shows that differentiation is used in literacy lessons by all teach -
ers, who, at least partly, employ differentiated instructional strategies by de -
voting more attention to academically weak students. As expected, teachers 
consider differentiation especially important in the case of academically weak 
students, as these students would not accomplish their objectives without ad -
ditional support and assistance. However, the results show that teachers use 
differentiation in other groups as well, since none of the teachers opted for the 
answer “Not true” for any of the groups. 
Nevertheless, it would have been preferable for the response “True” to 
score better (to achieve a higher percentage) in the case of high-performing 
and average students, since the main goal of differentiation is to create an envi -
ronment in which student abilities are optimally developed under the teacher’s 
guidance. In the modern school, we should not only strive to gain basic knowl -
edge, but to maximise the progress of each individual student. 
The third research question aims to determine which factors, according 
to teachers, have the most significant effect on student performance in literacy 
lessons: individual abilities (intellectual and speaking skills), family environ -
ment, student engagement in co-curricular activities or their social skills. 
The survey questionnaire contains questions regarding these factors, 
along with corresponding statements and a three-point attitude scale to meas -
ure the teachers’ opinions. 

26 the inclusion of differentiation in literacy lessons in the first and second ...
Table 4
Factors that, in the teachers’ opinion, have the greatest impact on student 
performance in literacy lessons. 
M SD N
The impact of individual abilities 1.52 .503 79
The impact of family environment 1.76 .430 79
The impact of social skills 2.05 .658 79
The impact of student engagement 
in co-curricular activities 
1.81 .482 79
As maintained by the teachers (Table 4), it is the individual abilities 
of students, which include, inter alia, intellectual and speaking abilities, that 
have the most significant impact on student performance. According to Musk 
(2014), these two types of ability represent a precondition for achievements in 
the field of mental abilities, independent of physical and psychomotor skills. 
As reported by the teachers, it is the following factors that significantly affect 
student performance (in order of importance): family environment, student 
engagement in co-curricular activities, and students’ social skills ( M = 2.05), 
which, according to Rozman (2006), include cooperation, listening, discus -
sions, empathy, manner of expression, having consideration for oneself and 
others, conflict resolution, and the ability to use one’s own internal resources. 
All of the claims about various types of impact on student performance 
in literacy lessons were assessed by the teachers as “partly true” , which can be 
explained by the fact that the influences are intertwined and mutually affect 
each other: if one of the influences becomes stronger, the others become stron -
ger as well. 
The purpose of the fourth research question was to establish the effects 
(success, motivation, self-confidence) that, according to the teachers, differen -
tiation has in various teaching strategies (frontal teaching, groupwork – homo -
geneous grouping, groupwork – heterogeneous grouping, remedial classes and 
supplementary lessons). We also wanted to gather the teachers’ opinions on 
the importance of integrating differentiation in literacy lessons using various 
teaching strategies. 
The results related to the effects of differentiation in various teaching 
strategies showed that, in the teachers’ opinion, frontal teaching does not affect 
the students’ performance, motivation and self-confidence. In homogenous 
groups, students deal with the same or different tasks that help them achieve 
common learning goals, while at the same time having an opportunity to 

c e p s Journal | V ol.12 | N
o
3 | Y ear 2022 27
cooperate and, with regard to their abilities, boost their progress. In the teach -
ers’ view, this teaching strategy affects student performance but does not have 
an impact on their motivation and self-confidence. According to the teachers, 
activities in heterogeneous groups, in which students are assigned either the 
same or different tasks, affect neither student performance nor the motiva -
tion and self-confidence of students. This result is rather surprising, as more 
able students can help academically weaker students in heterogeneous groups, 
which could increase the motivation of all group members, both those who give 
and those who receive help. We also wanted to find out more about the teach -
ers’ views on the importance of external differentiation in the form of remedial 
classes and supplementary lessons. The teachers believe that remedial classes 
do not significantly affect students’ performance, motivation and self-esteem. 
As a matter of fact, the teachers report a positive effect of remedial classes on 
student performance and motivation, yet they also claim that remedial classes 
do not improve students’ self-esteem. While the positive impact on student 
performance and motivation can be attributed to the individualised teaching 
approach, the absence of a positive effect on student self-esteem can be linked 
to prejudice about remedial classes, which are offered to academically weak 
students. In supplementary lessons, teachers set higher-order learning objec -
tives for their advanced students (in accordance with Bloom’s Taxonomy Levels 
of Learning), which promotes the development of their mental processes and 
consequently brings about students’ progress and success. Students involved in 
co-curricular activities usually show interest in additional learning activities 
and are motivated to work. A link between the teachers’ assessment of the im -
portance of integrating differentiation in literacy lessons and the organisation 
of different teaching strategies was established. Statistically significant results 
were identified in the following three cases: the assessment of the importance 
of differentiation and frontal teaching (p = 0.000), the assessment of the im -
portance of differentiation and groupwork with students working on the same 
tasks (p = 0.003), and the assessment of the importance of differentiation and 
groupwork with students tackling different tasks (p = 0.000). There are no sta -
tistically significant links between the teachers’ assessment of the importance 
of integrating differentiation and remedial classes and supplementary lessons. 
The results are as expected, since all three types teaching strategy – one frontal 
and two groupwork strategies – take place during regular classes with students 
of different ability levels learning together in heterogeneous groups. In this 
process, the teacher should take into account the students’ abilities and strive 
for the progress of each individual student. Remedial classes and supplemen -
tary lessons each comprise students with similar abilities, and this results in 

28 the inclusion of differentiation in literacy lessons in the first and second ...
the formation of homogeneous groups, which means that the teaching strategy 
itself is differentiated. 
Conclusion
The research presented in this paper is based primarily on teachers’ 
views obtained by a survey questionnaire. The results would most likely have 
be different if lesson observations had been conducted, which would also have 
allowed for greater objectivity. 
The research results demonstrate that first- and second-grade primary 
school teachers devote a lot of their time and attention to differentiation in 
literacy lessons. When planning such work in the classroom, teachers devote 
particular attention to the positive effects of differentiation on students. Teach -
ers believe that in differentiated literacy lessons, students boost their self-es -
teem due to the fact that they gain a sense of accomplishment and success by 
completing the easiest tasks first and then working their way up to more de -
manding tasks. Teachers maintain that students make greater progress and are 
more motivated if lessons are adapted to students’ abilities, interests and needs. 
Moreover, students are more likely to become actively engaged in dynamic les -
sons with a variety of teaching methods, and if reading and writing skills are 
practised through movement, singing and reciting. At the same time, teachers 
often adapt the learning objectives and literacy content to their students. By 
means of differentiation, teachers also contribute to the development of stu -
dents’ personal traits, especially independence and a sense of responsibility, 
while students are also encouraged to help their peers and support each other. 
In the classroom, however, differentiation alone does not fully meet students’ 
needs. According to differentiation principles, one should also take into ac -
count individualisation or the adaptation of the learning process to each in -
dividual student (Pečar, 2018). Research by Pečar (2018) showed that teachers 
believe it is essential for them to determine students’ prior knowledge and to 
link the subject matter with students’ interests if they want to ensure success -
ful adaptation of their lessons. In this way, student motivation is increased and 
they are encouraged to persevere in the process. Differentiation in literacy les -
sons is organised in various ways: frontal teaching, groupwork with students 
working on the same task, and groupwork with students doing different tasks 
depending on their abilities. All of the survey participants use these teaching 
strategies, which are often intertwined. Teachers select their teaching strate -
gies according to the stage of student learning: the introductory stage, where 
students are introduced to the new topic; the revision and consolidation stage; 

c e p s Journal | V ol.12 | N
o
3 | Y ear 2022 29
and the knowledge assessment stage. Although literacy lessons are carried out 
in remedial classes and supplementary lessons, the research data suggests that 
little attention is paid to tier 3 in these classes. During literacy lessons, most 
students are provided with differentiation, but those students who stand out 
– either as high-performing or low-performing students – are more likely to 
be provided with differentiation. Teachers divide students into groups that are 
either heterogeneous or homogeneous. Students in heterogeneous groups are 
selected either randomly or systematically, whereas a homogeneous grouping 
of students is planned by the teacher in advance. The purpose of groupwork is 
to promote collaborative learning that helps develop students’ communication 
skills, in our case reading and writing (Rot Vrhovec, 2015). In her study, Pečar 
(2018) also highlights adjustments with regard to the number of tasks, as well 
as teaching methods and the learning environment. It is interesting to note that 
teachers adapt their lessons mainly in mathematics and Slovenian, while les -
sons are adapted to a lesser extent in other subjects. 
According to teachers, student performance is affected by four factors: 
students’ individual abilities, their family environment, student engagement in 
co-curricular activities, and students’ social skills. Although teachers maintain 
that student performance is mainly affected by individual abilities, none of the 
other three parameters deviates greatly from the leading one, which means 
that all of the parameters are interdependent and affect each other. Research by 
Pečar (2018) demonstrates that, according to teachers, students’ performance 
is mostly affected by their family environment, followed by students’ active en -
gagement in co-curricular activities. It is extremely important to develop the 
abilities of the individual student as optimally as possible. Slovenian primary 
school teachers who teach first- and second-grade students are well aware of the 
importance of this principle, and they take it into account in their literacy les -
sons. Research has shown that academically weak students and gifted students 
are provided with differentiation to a greater extent than average students. The 
findings of the present paper are in line with those outlined in research by Pečar 
(2018), who also established that teaching is adapted mainly to high-perform -
ing and low-performing students. Pečar maintains that teachers are in favour 
of differentiation, but they often encounter obstacles such as state regulation 
of class size, a lack of time for differentiation, curriculum overload, discipline 
problems, and students’ lack of interest. Rot Vrhovec (2020) points out, among 
other things, the importance of adapting lessons to foreign students, but further 
research would be required on this topic. 

30 the inclusion of differentiation in literacy lessons in the first and second ...
References
Adams, C. M., Yssel, N., & Anwiler, H. (2012). Twice exceptional gifted learners and RTL: Targeting 
both sides of the same coin . In M. R. Coleman & S. K. Johnsen (Eds.), Implementing RTL with gifted 
students: Service models, trends, and issues (pp. 229–252). Prufrock. 
Arquette, C. (2007). Multiple activity literacy centers: Promoting choice and learning differentiation. 
Illinois Reading Council Journal , 35(3), 3–9.
Grginič, M. (2005). Porajajoča se pismenost [Emerging literacy]. Izolit.
Grimes, K. J., & Stevens, D. D. (2009). Glass, bug, mud. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 677–80.
Haughbrook, R., Hart, S. Schatschneider, C., & Taylor, J. (2017). Genetic and environmental 
influences on early literacy skills across school grade contexts. Developmental Science , 20(5), 1–12.
International Reading Association. (2000). Making a difference means making it different: Honouring 
children’s rights to excellent reading instruction . In M. Block, C. Borsheim-Black & T. Hicks (Eds.), 
Michigan reading journal (pp. 6–7). Michigan Reading Association.
Jefferson, R. E., Grant, C. E., & Sander, J. B. (2017). Effects of tier 1 differentiation and reading 
intervention on reading fluency, comprehension, and high stakes measures. Reading Psychology , 38(1), 
97–124.
Jožef, J. (2019). Razvijanje govora v prvem vzgojno-izobraževalnem obdobju osnovne šole. [Speech 
development in the initial stages of primary school education]. In K. Podbevšek & N. Žavbi (Eds.), 
Govor v pedagoški praksi (pp. 49–56). Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete.
Klopčič, V . (2013). The paths of Roma language. In A. Žele (Ed.), Obdobja 32 symposium: The social 
functionality of language (aspects, criteria, definitions) (pp. 213–218). Centre for Slovene as a Second 
and Foreign Language.
Knez, M. (2009). Linguistic inclusion (and exclusion) of immigrant children. In M. Stabej (Ed.), 
Obdobja 28 symposium: The infrastructure of Slovene and Slovene language studies . (pp. 197–202). 
Centre for Slovene as a Second and Foreign Language.
Marjanovič Umek, L. (2007). Diferenciacija  v šoli; enako ali različno za različne otroke 
[Differentiation in school: Same or different for different children]. Sodobna pedagogika , 58 (2), 
108–127.
Morgan, H. (2014). Maximizing student success with differentiated learning. Clearing House , 87(1), 
34–38. 
Musek, J. (2014). Psihološki temelji družbe prihodnosti [The psychological foundations of the 
society of the future]. Inštitut za etiko in vrednote Jože Trontelj.
Pečar, M. (2018). Izkušnje in stališča učiteljev o prilagajanju pouka predznanju in interesom učencev 
[Teachers’ experience and views on adapting lessons to students’ prior knowledge and interests] 
(Doctoral dissertation). Univerza v Ljubljani, Pedagoška fakulteta.
Pečjak, S., & Potočnik, N. (2011). Razvoj zgodnje pismenosti ter individualizacija in diferenciacija 
dela v prvem razredu osnovne šole [Early literacy development, individualisation and work 
differentiation in the first class of primary school]. Razvoj komunikacijskih zmožnosti v vrtcu in 

c e p s Journal | V ol.12 | N
o
3 | Y ear 2022 31
začetno opismenjevanje.  Zavod RS za šolstvo. 
Policastro, M. M., Mazeski, D., & Wach, N. (2019). Getting to know our students: The heart of 
differentiation in the balanced literacy classroom. Illinois Reading Council Journal , 47(4), 19–28.
Poznanovič Jezeršek, M., Cestnik, M., Čuden, M., Gomivnik Thuma, V ., Honzak, M., Križaj 
Ortar, M., Rosc Leskovec, D., Žveglič, M., & Ahačič, K. (2019). Učni načrt. Program osnovna šola. 
Slovenščina. [School curriculum. Primary school education programme. Slovenian language]. 
Ministrstvo za šolstvo in šport: Zavod Republike Slovenije za šolstvo. 
Puzio, K., Colby, G. T., & Algeo-Nichols, D. (2020). Differentiated literacy instruction: Boondoggle 
or best practice? Review of Educational Research , 90(4), 459–498.
Rot Vrhovec, A. (2015). Collaborative learning strategies in the linguistic part of Slovene language 
lessons in primary school. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal , 5(3), 156–181.
Rot Vrhovec, A. (2020). Teaching students whose first language is not Slovenian. Faculty of Education.
Rozman, U. (2006). Trening socialnih veščin [Social skill training]. Educa.
Strmčnik, F. (2001). Didaktika. Osrednje didaktične teme [Didactics. Central didactic themes]. 
Znanstveni Inštitut Filozofske Fakultete.
Stropnik Kunič, N. (2012). Individualization and differentiation as a model of new communication in 
the learning process. Informatologia , 45(1), 44–52.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: Strategies and tools for 
responsive teaching . Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2004). Sharing responsibility for differentiating instruction. Roeper Review , 26(4), 
188–189.
Waldon, N., & McLeskey, J. (2001). Nancy Waldron and James McLeskey: Helping schools include all 
learners. Sage Journals , 36(3), 175–181. 
Yssel, N., Adams, C., & Clarke, L. S. (2014). Applying an RTI model for students with learning 
disabilities who are gifted. Teaching Exceptional Children , 46(3), 42–52.
Zakon o osnovni šoli [Primary School Act]. (2006). Uradni list RS [Official Journal of 
the Republic of Slovenia] št. 81/06  – uradno prečiščeno besedilo [official consolidated 
text],  102/07, 107/10, 87/11, 40/12  – ZUJF, 63/13  in 46/16  – ZOFVI-L).
Žalik, L. (1988). Diferenciacija in individualizacija dela v prvem razredu [Differentiation and 
individualisation of work in the first class of primary school]. Vzgoja in izobraževanje , 19(3), 28–33.

32 the inclusion of differentiation in literacy lessons in the first and second ...
Biographical note
Jasna Šv ajger is a Primary School teacher at OŠ Drska in Novo mesto. 
Currently she is doing her PhD at the Faculty of Education, University of Lju -
bljana, majoring in teacher education. Her research interests include develop -
ment of teaching practice and teacher education in the area of special theoreti -
cal and applied didactics of the Slovene language. Her research work is mainly 
focused on modern didactic approaches to teaching children in the first three 
grades of primary school.