Review article UDC 593.72/.73:591.9(262.3-13) Received: 2009-09-08 PLANKTONIC CNIDARIANS IN THE OPEN SOUTHERN ADRIATIC SEA: A COMPARISON OF HISTORICAL AND RECENT DATA Davor LUCIC, Adam BENOVIC, Ivona ONOFRI, Mima BATISTIC, Barbara GANGAI, Marijana MILOSLAVIC, Vladimir ONOFRI, Jakica NJIRE, Igor BRAUTOVIC & Dubravka BOJANIC VAREZIC University of Dubrovnik, Institute for Marine and Coastal Research, HR-20000 Dubrovnik, Damjana Jude 12, Croatia E-mail: davor.lucic@unidu.hr Mira MOROVIC Institute for Oceanography and Fisheries, HR-21000 Split, Setaliste I. Mestrovica 63, Croatia Tjasa KOGOVSEK Marine Biology Station, National Institute of Biology, 6330 Piran, Fornace 41, Slovenia ABSTRACT This review compares historical data sets (1967-68, 1974-1976, 1993-1995) to the most recent data (2002-2004) on the composition, abundance, bathymetric distribution, and vertical migration of cnidarians of the deep southern Adriatic. 18 species of medusae are typical open-ocean holoplantonic species and 6 of these were either always or frequently found in samples, namely Rhabdoon singulare, Aglaura hemistoma, Persa incolorata, Rhopalonema vela-tum, Sminthea eurygaster, andSolmissus albescens. The most common calycophore siphonophores are Lensia subtilis, L. meteori, Eudoxoides spiralis, Sphaeronectes gracilis, and S. irregularis followed by Hippopodius hippopus, Vogtia penthacantha, Lensia conoidea, L. fowleri, Chelophyes appendiculata, Kephyes ovata, and Bassia bassensis. Some differences in presence and abundance between historical and recent data are noted. Key words: South Adriatic, medusae, calycophoran siphonophores, composition, abundance, bathymetric distribution CNIDARI PLANCTONICI IN ACQUE APERTE DELL'ADRIATICO MERIDIONALE: CONFRONTO FRA DATI STORICI E RECENTI SINTESI L'articolo confronta serie di dati storici (1967-68, 1974-1976, 1993-1995) con quelli piu recenti (2002-2004) inerenti la composizione, l'abbondanza, la distribuzione batimetrica e la migrazione verticale dei cnidari delle ac-que profonde dell'Adriatico meridionale. 18 specie di meduse sono tipiche specie oloplanctoniche di acque aperte; 6 di queste sono state ritrovate sempre o molto frequentemente nei campioni. Si tratta di Rhabdoon singulare, Aglaura hemistoma, Persa incolorata, Rhopalonema velatum, Sminthea eurygaster, e Solmissus albescens. I piu co-muni sifonofori calicofori sono Lensia subtilis, L. meteori, Eudoxoides spiralis, Sphaeronectes gracilis e S. irregularis, seguiti da Hippopodius hippopus, Vogtia penthacantha, Lensia conoidea, L. fowleri, Chelophyes appendiculata, Kephyes ovata e Bassia bassensis. Nell'articolo vengono presentate alcune differenze nella presenza e nell'abbon-danza fra dati storici e recenti. Parole chiave: Adriatico meridionale, meduse, sifonofori calicofori, composizione, abbondanza, distribuzione batimetrica INTRODUCTION Planktonic cnidarians are an important and often conspicuous component of the top trophic level of many marine ecosystems. Knowledge of their spatial and temporal variability and their production dynamics is essential to understand the flow of energy and cycle of materials in these systems (Persad et a/., 2003).0wing to the comparative difficulties of open-ocean sampling, it is not surprising that relatively fewer observations of diversity and abundance have been reported for pelagic cnidarians and other pelagic gelatinous taxa than for those in more accessible nearshore waters (Youngbluth et a/., 2008). The combination of over-fishing, eutrophication, climate change, translocation, and habitat modification that have been documented over the recent years in a wide range of marine areas appear to have favoured the development of jellyfish populations over that of other marine organisms (Molinero et a/., 2008; Richardson et a/., 2009). This upsurge of jellyfish was sufficiently dramatic and wide-spread that it attracted notable scientific and even popular attention (Purcell, 2005). This same pattern has also been reported in the Adriatic Sea, but so far only for coastal waters. For example, previously unrecorded blooms of Muggiea at/antica was found in the northern Adriatic (Krsinic & Njire, 2001), the formerly dominant M. kochi was replaced by a congener, M. at/antica, in the eastern southern Adriatic, and schyphomedusae, especially Pe/agia nocti/uca, underwent unusually persistent blooms along the eastern Adriatic coast (Benovic & Lučic, 2001; Miloš, 2009). Research on planktonic cnidarians has a long tradition in the Adriatic Sea (see Benovic & Lučic, 1996; Gamulin & Kršinic, 2000). The open southern Adriatic Sea is one of the few parts of the Mediterranean that has been subjected to relatively constant study of cnidarians over the past 70 years (Gamulin, 1966, 1968, 1977; Benovic, 1973, 1976; Bender & Benovic, 1986; Benovic & Bender, 1987; Gamulin & Kršinic, 1993a,b, 2000; Benovic & Lučic, 1996, 2001; Batistic et a/., 2004; Benovic et a/, 2005, Lučic et a/, 2005, 2009). Comparative analysis of data collected over this period is made easier by the similar sampling methodology used in all studies: that is, vertical tows in several specific layers with standard plankton nets. Although the presentation of results differs from paper to paper, certain useful indicators of system change, such as species composition, relative abundance, and bathymetric distribution, can be extracted from the published data. Four comprehensive older publications were used in the current analysis: Benovic (1976) describes the monthly distribution and abundance of hydromedusae from July 1967 to June 1968; Bender & Benovic (1986) and Benovic & Bender (1987) evaluate the distribution of medusae based on material collected during seasonal cruises from 1974 to 1976 at five stations in the deep southern Adriatic; Gamulin & Krsinic (2000) consolidate older data on calycophore siphonophores in the Adriatic Sea based on monthly sampling from July 1967 to June 1968, seasonal cruises from 1974 to 1976, and five cruises from 1993 to 1995. Similar but more recent investigations began again in 2002 for the international cooperative project "Medusa", summarized by Benovic et aI. (2005) and Lucic et aI. (2005) who described the bathymetric distribution of medusae and calycophoran siphonophorae during spring 2002, and Lucic et al. (2009) who reported on diel vertical migrations of medusae in July 2003. This review compares historical and recent data on cnidarians from the deep southern Adriatic, with unpublished data from February and October 2004 incorporated into the analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS Study area The Southern Adriatic Sea is a semicircular oligo-trophic basin with depths to about 1200 m (Fig. 1). It is confluent with the Eastern Mediterranean Sea via inflow of Ionian Surface Water and Levantine Intermediate Water through the Strait of Otranto (~ 800 m depth), and Fig. 1: Location of sampling in the southern Adriatic. SI. 1: Lokacija vzorčenja v južnem Jadranu. with other regions of the Adriatic Sea via currents moving along the Adriatic coast. The region is a source of deep-water that participates in the broader circulation of the Mediterranean Sea (Vilibic & Orlic, 2001) and also features a cyclonic gyre that is present throughout the year (Gačic ef a/., 2002). Each water mass has a characteristic species assemblage, and the above circulation patterns therefore play an important role in the spatial and seasonal distribution of small zooplankton of the southern Adriatic (Kršinic & Grbec, 2006). The thermocline starts to form in May and is well developed at 14 m by July or August (Morovic ef a/., 2006). In the deepest layers, temperature is rather constant (from 13 to 15 °C) during the whole year. Salinity is generally higher than 38 throughout the water column (Morovic ef a/., 2006). In September and October, the thermocline is still relatively shallow, at 40 m. As in other parts of the Mediterranean, the thermocline disappears completely in late autumn and winter owing to vertical mixing driven by strong winds. Whereas temperature changes in the upper 100 m are easily traced to seasonal influences of the local climate, those in deep layers are governed by inter-annual variations in circulation caused by larger-scale pressure differences (Grbec ef a/., 2009). The deep Mediterranean water that passes through the Strait of Otranto is relatively warmer, saltier, and richer in nutrients than the typical southern Adriatic water. Nutrients often enhance planktonic productivity and, precisely phytoplankton blooms linked to these deeper water masses have been observed (Gačic ef a/., 2002). Material and methods All data analyzed in this paper were collected in the deepest area of the southern Adriatic (1000-1200 m depth). Benovic (1976) sampled monthly with an Indian Ocean standard closing net (250 'm mesh, 100 cm diameter) at 0-100, 100-200, 200-300, 300-400, 400- 600, and 600-1000 m. Bender & Benovic (1986) and Benovic & Bender (1987) used the same nets but sampled with vertical hauls from bottom to surface. The same methodologies were used to collect samples for description of calycophorans during the same period (Gamulin & Krsinic, 2000); from 1993-1995 samples were collected at 0-50, 50-100, 100-200, 300-400, 400-600, and 600-1000 m (Tab. 1). Project "Medusa" used Nansen opening-closing nets (200 'm mesh, 113-cm diameter) within the following layers: 0-50, 50-100, 100-200, 300-400, 400-600, 600-800, 800-1200 m. The most extensive sampling was conducted in July 2003 when nineteen series (152 vertical hauls) were collected. Owing to a strong thermocline at about 15 m, samples were taken from 0-15 m (above the thermocline) and from 15-50 m depth. Benovic et a/. (2005) and Lucic et a/. (2005, 2009) provide a detailed description of the study area, sampling program, and methodology for spring and summer cruises. The same methodology was used in February and October 2004 (unpubl. data) when six (48 hauls) and three (24 hauls) sample series, respectively, were collected (Tab. 1). All plankton samples were preserved in 2.5% formalin-sea water solution buffered with CaCO3. Cnidarians were identified with a stereomicroscope. Results from historical investigations were presented as the total number of specimens (Benovic, 1976; Benovic & Bender, 1987) or number of individuals per m2 (Bender & Benovic, 1986; Gamulin & Krsinic, 2000). Medusae and calycophoran nectophores (polygastric only) in the recent work are expressed as the number of individuals per m3 or 10 m3. Because of these differences, historical and recent comparisons are based on relative frequency of occurrence and abundance where relative frequency of occurrence is: r = rare, observed in < 10% samples during the sampling period; f = frequent, observed in 10%-50% samples during the sampling period; vf = very frequent, observed in >50% during the sampling period. Tab. 1: Historical and recent arrangement of sampling methodology in the Southern Adriatic Sea. Tab. 1: Pregled pretekle in sedanje metodologije vzorčenja v južnem jadranskem morju. Sampling years Methodology of sampling Depth layers (m) 1967-1968 Indian Ocean standard closing net, 100 cm diameter, 250 cm long, mesh size 250 'm 100-0, 200-100, 300-200, 400-300, 600400,1000-600 1974-1976 Indian Ocean standard closing net, 113 cm diameter, mesh size 250 'm From bottom to surface 1993-1995 Nansen opening-closing net, 113 cm diameter, 350 cm long, mesh size 250 'm 50-0, 100-50, 200-100, 300-200, 400-300, 600-400, 1000-600 2002-2004 Nansen opening-closing net, 113 cm diameter, 350 cm long, mesh size 200 'm 15-0, 50-15, 100-50, 200-100, 400-200, 600-400, 800-600, 1200-800 RESULTS AND DISSCUSION Medusan frequency of occurrence Most of the 55 medusan species that have been identified in the Adriatic Sea (Benovic & Lucic, 1996) have a bentho-pelagic metagenetic life cycle and are carried to the open southern Adriatic with water currents. 18 species of medusae are typical open-ocean holoplantonic species (Tab. 2), 6 of which were always - or frequently - found in the Adriatic Sea: Rhabdoon singulare, Aglaura hemistoma, Persa incolorata, Rhopa-lonema velatum, Sminthea eurygaster, and Solmissus albescens. 3 - Bythotiaria murrayi, Krampella dubia, and Haliscera bigelowi - were rare. The frequency of occurrence of Solmundella bitentaculata and Paraphyllina intermedia appears to be seasonal. The bathypelagic tra-chymedusan Haliscera bigelowi and the coastal an-thomedusan Dicodonium adriaticum were found only in recent investigations (Benovic et al., 2005). Other differences between historical and recent data are worthy of note. For example, Liriope tetraphylla, tra- ditionally among the most frequently encountered hy-dromedusae in this region, was collected only very rarely in recent investigations. In fact, the last time that this medusa was found frequently in samples from the southern Adriatic was November 1993 (Benovic & Lucic, 1996). L. tetraphylla was observed to undergo large inter-annual variations in abundance and seasonality in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea, but these variations do not appear to be linked to long-term changes in hydrographic conditions (Buecher et al., 1997). There was, however, an inverse relationship between the numbers of L. tetraphylla and the schy-phomedusn Pelagia noctiluca (Buecher et al., 1997). A mass occurrence of P. noctiluca observed in the Adriatic from 1997 to 2006 (unpubl. data) coincided with a drastic decrease of L. tetraphylla abundance. Oceania armata, Amphinema rubra, Leuckartiara octona, Octo-phialucium funerarium, and Arctopodema australis are now found more frequently than in previous investigations and may be considered characteristic of the open southern Adriatic. Rhopalonema funerarium, on the other hand, has been found only in recent investigations. Species 1967-1968 1974-1976 May 2002 July 2003 Feb 2004 Oct 2004 Rhabdoon singulare vf vf vf vf vf f Oceania armata r f f f r Amphinema rubra r vf vf vf f Leuckartiara octona r r f f Bythotiara murrayi r r r Krampella dubia r r Octophialucium funerarium r r r vf vf Haliscera bigelowi r r Liriope tetraphylla vf vf r Aglaura hemistoma vf vf vf vf vf f Arctapodema australis r f vf vf f Persa incolorata vf vf vf vf vf vf Rhopalonema funerarium r r f r Rhopalonema velatum vf vf vf vf vf vf Sminthea eurygaster vf f f f f r Solmundella bitentaculata f vf f f f Solmissus albescens vf vf vf vf vf vf Paraphyllina intermedia f f Tab. 2: List of typical Southern Adriatic Sea medusae collected from 1967 to 2004 and their relative frequency of occurrence: r = rare; f = frequent; vf = very frequent. Data sources: 1967-1968, Benovic (1976); 1974-1976, Bender & Benovic (1986) and Benovic & Bender (1987); May 2002, Benovic et al. (2005); July 2003, Lučič et al. (2009); February and October 2004, unpubl. Tab. 2: Seznam tipičnih meduz južnega Jadranskega morja, zbranih od 1967 do 2004 in relativna pogostost njihovega pojavljanja: r = redko; f = pogosto; vf = zelo pogosto. Podatkovni viri: 1967-1968, Benovič (1976); 19741976, Bender & Benovič (1986) in Benovič & Bender (1987); maj 2002, Benovič et al. (2005); julij 2003, Lučič et al. (2009); februar in oktober 2004, neobjavljeno. One obvious difference between historical and recent data is the presence of coastal species in the surface waters of the open southern Adriatic. Hydromedusae of the genera Hydractinia, Boungainvillia, Clytia, and Obelia, previously encountered very frequently, are now found only very rarely. This might be related to the substantial changes in the Anthomedusan and Leptomedu-san fauna that have occurred in the northern Adriatic (Benovic et al., 1987). Namely, as the majority of these meta-genetic species has disappeared in the north, they are no longer transported along the Italian coast to populate the southern Adriatic fauna (Benovic et al., 2000). Calycophoran frequency of occurrence 23 calycophore species were recorded, all in the southern Adriatic. Except for Muggiaea kochi and M. atlantica, all of these species are common to, or exclusively found in, the open sea. Compared with historical data, only the rarely encountered Rosacea cymbiformis and Sulculeolaria quadrivalvis were not found in thee recent work. Calycophore frequency of occurrence does not differ substantially in historical and recent data (Tab. 3). The southern Adriatic's well-developed cyclonic gyre (Gacic et al., 2002) probably contributes to maintaining a relatively constant composition of the plankton community, including gelatinous taxa. The most common species are Lensia subtilis, L. meteori, Eudoxoides spiralis, Sphaero-nectes gracilis, and S. irregularis, followed by Hippopo-dius hippopus, Vogtia penthacantha, L. conoidea, L. fowleri, Chelophyes appendiculata, Kephyes ovata, and Bassia bassensis. The calycophoran K. ovata, previously known as Clausophyes ovata, was reclassified by Pugh (2006). Species 1965-1994 May 2002 July 2003 Feb 2004 Oct 2004 Rosacea cymbiformis r Hippopodius hippopus f f r f Vogtia pentacantha r r f f r Sulculeolaria quadrivalvis r Sulculeolaria turgida r Sulculeolaria chuni r r r Diphyes dispar r Lensia conoidea f f f f r Lensia multicristata r r r Lensia fowleri r f f f Lensia subtilis vf vf vf vf vf Lensia campanella r r r Lensia meteori vf vf vf vf vf Lensia subtiloides r r Chelophyes appendiculata f r r f f Eudoxoides spiralis vf vf vf f vf Sphaeronectes gracilis f vf vf vf Sphaeronectes irregularis vf f vf vf f Sphaeronectes gamulini r r Sphaeronectes fragilis r r r Kephyes ovata r f f f r Abylopsis tetragona f r r Bassia bassensis f r f f r Tab. 3: List of typical Southern Adriatic Sea calycophoran nectophores collected from 1965 to 2004 and their relative frequency of occurrence: r = rare; f = frequent; vf = very frequent. Data sources: 1965-1994, summarized in Gamulin & Kršinič (2000); May 2002, Lučič et al. (2005); July 2003, Lučič et al. (2009); February and October 2004, unpubl. Tab. 3: Seznam tipičnih kalikofornih cevkašev južnega Jadranskega morja, zbranih od 1965 do 2004 in relativna pogostost njihovega pojavljanja: r = redko; f = pogosto; vf = zelo pogosto. Podatkovni viri: 1965-1994, povzeto v Gamulin & Kršinič (2000); maj 2002, Lučič et al. (2005); julij 2003, Lučič et al. (2009); februar in oktober 2004, neobjavljeno. Medusan abundance These data suggest that important changes have occurred in medusan abundance. Total abundance appears to be higher in recent studies. This is especially the case for Rhabdoon singulare, Oceania armata, Octo-phialucium funerarium, and Arctapodema australis. These species were historically relatively rare, but they are decidedly more abundant and sometimes dominant in our more recent samples (Tab. 4). On the other hand, Liriope tetraphylla, previously one of the more numerous medusae, has undergone a dramatic decrease, and in some cases it was absent altogether. Aglaura hemis-toma, Persa incolorata, Rhopalonema velatum, and Solmissus albescens, however, have remained regularly abundant. The massive appearance of meroplanktonic coastal species that occurred seasonally in historical studies has not been observed in our more recent work. Nevertheless, medusan densities above 100 m in May 2002 and July 2003 are among the highest reported for any open-sea environment (see Benovic et al., 2005 and Lucic et al., 2009). For example, particularly high densities of Rhopalonema velatum were found in the 50-100 m layer, with 358 ind. 10 m-3 in May 2002, 93 ind. 10 m-3 in July 2003, and 51 ind. 10 m-3 in February and October 2004. Calycophoran abundance There was no detectable change in the abundance of calycophoran species between earlier and recent samples. Lensia subtilis continues to be the most numerous species, followed by Eudoxoides spiralis and L. meteori. Sphaeronectes gracilis and S. irregularis also were abundant. Several species do, however, appear at notably higher abundance in recent investigations (Tab. 5). In particular, Kephyes ovata was more numerous; in July 2003, there was an unusually high number of Vogtia pentacantha. Further, one of the highest nectophore densities yet reported for the open sea (275 nectophores 10 m-3) was found above 50 m at night in May 2002, due primarily to L. subtilis (Lucic et al., 2005). Species 1967-1968 1974-1976 May 2002 |uly 2003 Feb 2004 Oct 2004 Rhabdoon singulare c c ccc ccc c c Oceania armata + c c cc c Amphinema rubra + c cc c + Leuckartiara octona + + c + Bythotiara murrayi + + + Krampella dubia + + Octophialucium funerarium + + + c c Haliscera bigelowi + + Liriope tetraphylla ccc ccc + Aglaura hemistoma ccc ccc c ccc ccc c Arctapodema australis + + c c + Persa incolorata ccc cc cc cc ccc c Rhopalonema funerarium + + + + Rhopalonema velatum ccc ccc ccc ccc ccc ccc Sminthea eurygaster cc + c c + + Solmundella bitentaculata + cc c c c Solmissus albescens cc c cc ccc ccc c Paraphyllina intermedia + + Tab. 4: Relative abundance of Southern Adriatic Sea medusae collected from 1967 to 2004. Historical data were recalculated as number of individuals per 10 m3: + = <1 ind. 10 m3; c = 1-5 ind. 10 m3; cc = >5-10 ind. 10 m3; ccc = >10 ind. 10 m3. Data sources: 1967-1968, Benovic (1976); 1974-1976, Bender & Benovic (1986) and Benovic & Bender (1987); May 2002, Benovic et al. (2005); July 2003, Lučic et al. (2009); February and October 2004, un-publ. Tab. 4: Relativna številčnost meduz južnega Jadranskega morja, zbranih od 1967 do 2004. Podatki iz preteklih študij so bili preračunani na število osebkov na 10 m3: + = <1 ind. 10 m3; c = 1-5 ind. 10 m3; cc = >5-10 ind. 10 m3; ccc = >10 ind. 10 m3. Podatkovni viri: 1967-1968, Benovic (1976); 1974-1976, Bender & Benovic (1986) in Benovic & Bender (1987); maj 2002, Benovic et al. (2005); julij 2003, Lučic et al. (2009); februar in oktober 2004, neobjavljeno. Tab. 5: Relative abundance of Southern Adriatic Sea calycophoran nectophores collected from1965 to 2004. Historical data were recalculated as number of nectophores per 10 m3: + = <1 ind. 10 m3; c = 1-5 ind. 10 m3; cc = >5-10 ind. 10 m3; ccc = >10 ind. 10 m3. Data sources: 1965-1994, summarized in Gamulin & Kršinič (2000); May 2002, Lučič ef a/. (2005); july 2003, Lučič ef a/. (2009); February and October 2004, unpubl. Tab. 5: Relativna številčnost kalikofornih cevkašev južnega jadranskega morja, zbranih od 1965 do 2004. Podatki iz preteklih študij so bili preračunani na število nektoforov na 10 m3: + = <1 ind. 10 m3; c = 1-5 ind. 10 m3; cc = >5-10 ind. 10 m3; ccc = >10 ind. 10 m3. Podatkovni viri: 1965-1994, povzeto v Gamulin & Kršinič (2000); maj 2002, Lučič ef a/. (2005); julij 2003, Lučič ef a/. (2009); februar in oktober 2004, neobjavljeno. Species 1965-1994 May 2002 July 2003 Feb 2004 Oct 2004 Rosacea c\mb/Yorm/s + +/ppopod/us K/ppopus c c + c Vogt/a pentacantKa + + cc + + Su/cu/eo/ar/a quadr/va/v/s + Su/cu/eo/ar/a turg/da + Su/cu/eo/ar/a cKun/ + + + D/pK\es d/spar + /ens/a cono/dea + c c + + /ens/a mu/t/cr/stata + + + /ens/a /ow/er/ + + c + /ens/a subt///s ccc ccc ccc ccc ccc /ens/a campane//a + + + /ens/a meteor/ ccc ccc ccc ccc ccc /ens/a subt//o/des + + CKe/opK\es append/cu/ata c + + c c Eudoxo/des sp/ra//s cc ccc ccc c ccc SpKaeronectes grac///s c ccc ccc cc SpKaeronectes /rregu/ar/s cc c cc cc c SpKaeronectes gamu//n/ + + SpKaeronectes frag/7/s + + + .epK\es ovata + c c c + $b\/ops/s tetragona c + + Bass/a bassens/s c + c c + There are several potential explanations for the increased abundance of planktonic cnidarians in recent samples: a. Higher average water temperatures than in previous years (Gacic et a/., 2006) could have stimulated an increase in general plankton production. Accordingly, recent investigations found particularly high micro- and mesozooplankton densities (except in October 2004, when the total number of cnidarians was low). b. Unlike previously, our recent investigations emphasized day-night sampling, with higher densities near the surface at night. c. The short-term, repetitive sampling used in our recent work provides a more thorough temporal coverage of the study area and so it can be expected to characterize abundance more reliably and also capture less abundant components. Medusan bathymetric distribution and vertical migration As noted above, full understanding of the role of planktonic cnidarians in pelagic food webs requires knowledge of bathymetric distribution and migration patterns. Of many factors proposed to explain vertical migratory behavior, most attention was given to light intensity, hydrographic variables, feeding, and predator avoidance. Medusan vertical distributions and migration in the southern Adriatic have been described in recent papers (see Lucic et a/., 2009), except for So/m/ssus a/-bescens (Benovic, 1973). Table 6 summarizes these data. Tab. 6: Seasonal bathymetric distribution of typical Southern Adriatic Sea medusae. Data sources only from recent investigations (2002-2004). Tab. 6: Sezonska batimetrijska distribucija tipičnih meduz južnega Jadranskega morja. Podatkovni viri: samo novejše raziskave (2002-2004). Species Winter SPrin£ Summer Autumn Rhabdoon singulare 0-200 50-600 15-600 50-200 Oceania armata 0-100 0-600 15-200 30-400 Amphinema rubra 15-400 100-600 100-800 100-200 Leuckartiara octona 50-400 50-600 Bythotiara murrayi 200-400 Krampella dubia 400-600 Octophialucium funerarium 400-1200 200-800 200-1200 Haliscera bigelowi 600-800 600-800 Liriope tetraphylla 0-100 0-15 Aglaura hemistoma 0-100 0-100 0-100 0-30 Arctapodema australis 200-1200 200-800 200-1200 400-800 Persa incolorata 0-1200 100-800 50-1200 0-600 Rhopalonema funerarium 400-1200 200-600 600-800 400-1200 Rhopalonema velatum 0-600 0-1200 0-800 0-600 Sminthea eurygaster 50-400 50-600 100-1200 Solmundella bitentaculata 0-200 0-400 15-400 Solmissus albescens 0-1200 0-1200 15-1200 50-1200 Paraphyllina intermedia 600-1200 400-1200 The only pelagic cnidarian found exclusively above 100 m was Aglaura hemistoma, an omnivore that feeds on microphytoplankton and protists (Colin et al., 2003). Most A. hemistoma occur quite near the surface, except during summer months when it aggregates just above the thermocline. Liripe tertraphylla is also a surface species. Rhopalonema velatum, Rhabdoon singulare, and Oceania armata are sub-surface species found mainly above 100 m. These medusae rarely breached the thermocline, but during winter months they were sometimes abundant near the surface at night. Part of the R. vela-tum and R. singulare populations, however, sought deeper layers at night. The more frequent and abundant medusae are characteristic members of the southern Adriatic's upper mesopelagic fauna. These are: Amphinema rubra, Persa incolorata, Leuckartia octona, Sminthea eurygaster, and Solmundella bitentaculata, as well as the rare species Bythotiaria murrayi. The highest frequency of occurrence and population density of these species is between 100 and 400 m. A common behavioral feature of this group is that they migrate in both directions at night, that is, both toward the surface and toward the bottom. Their vertical movements are also seasonal, such that in winter these species swim to the surface at night whereas at other times of the year they do not migrate shallower than 100 m depth. Characteristic species of the lower mesopelagic are Octophialucium funerarium, Arctapodema australis, Rhopalonema velatum, and a very rare Krampella dubia. These species undergo extensive vertical migrations, with their upper border being 200 m. The scyphomedusa Paraphyllina intermedia is mostly bathypelagic and migrates to within 400 m of the surface at night. The most important vertical migrant is Sollmisus albescens, behaviorally distinguished from all other species: it has the widest vertical distribution and undertakes the most extensive diel migration, spanning more than 800 m at the average speed of 222 m/h (K. Katja Yong, pers. comm.). It aggregates within 400-800 m layer at midday and toward evening moves to upper layers. The highest abundance was found at night between the surface and 50 m. An exception to this pattern occurs in summer and autumn when its upward movement is blocked by a well-developed thermocline. S. albescens primarily eats other gelatinous organisms (Raskoff, 2002). Thus, its extensive migrations to surface layers might be explained by appreciably higher densities of their potential prey above 100 m at night. Calycophoran bathymetric distribution and vertical migrations There was substantial variation in the depth range of most common calycophorans (Tab. 7): Lensia conoidea (100-1200), L. meteori (100-1200), L. subtilis (0-600), Sphaeronectes irregularis (0-600), L. fowleri (100-600), Kephyes ovata (800-1200), and Sphaeronectes gracilis (0-200). The species distributed mainly above 100 m depth were Hippopodius hippopus, Lensia subtilis, L. campanula, Chelophyes appendiculata, Eudoxoides spiralis, Sphaeronectes gracilis, S. irregularis, S. gamulini, and Bassia bassensis. Typical nocturnal movements toward the surface were recorded only for L. subtilis and Sphaeronectes gracilis, both of which aggregated below the thermocline during summer. E. spiralis migrated both toward the surface and below 100 m. Calycophores found mainly below 100 m depth were Sulculeolaria chuni, Lensia multicristata, L. fowleri, L. meteori, L. subtiloides, and Sphaeronectes fragilis. These species migrated to shallower layers primarily in winter, except for L meteori, which was collected near the surface. Most specimens of L. conoidea and Vogtia penthacantha were collected below 400 m during the day but were as shallow as 100 m at night. K. ovata appears to be non-migratory. There are some differences between historical (Ga-mulin & Krsinic, 2000) and recent data regarding the maximum depth of some calycophores. In particular, V. penthacantha was described earlier as a typical deep-sea species, but our recent collections show that it is routinely found as shallow as 100 m at night. These seeming historical differences are clearly a function of nighttime samples that characterize our more recent field work. Additionally, the maximum depth earlier reported for Hippopodius hippopus, Lensia subtilis, L. campanulla, and Chelophyes appendiculata was 1000 m, but this is not substantiated by recent investigations. CONCLUSIONS The present work reports historical and recent data on the species composition, abundance, bathymetric distribution, and vertical migrations of planktonic cni-darians in the water column over the deepest area of the oligotrophic South Adriatic Sea. 11 species were found on all cruises, with the more abundant being medusa Rhopalonema velatum and the siphonophore Lensia subtilis. Species Winter Sprin£ Summer Autumn Hippopodius hippopus 0-200 0-100 0-200 Vogtia pentacantha 0-800 100-200 200-1200 400-600 Sulculeolaria chuni 100-400 0-200 Lensia conoidea 100-1200 400-1200 100-1200 400-600 Lensia multicristata 100-400 100-400 Lensia fowleri 50-400 100-400 100-600 Lensia subtilis 0-600 0-200 0-600 0-200 Lensia campanella 50-100 50-400 Lensia meteori 0-400 50-800 100-600 200-600 Lensia subtiloides 100-600 Chelophyes appendiculata 0-200 0-100 15-50 200-600 Eudoxoides spiralis 0-200 0-300 0-1200 0-800 Sphaeronectes gracilis 0-200 0-400 0-200 Sphaeronectes irregularis 0-600 50-200 15-600 50-400 Sphaeronectes gamulini 50-100 Sphaeronectes fragilis 100-400 15-800 Kephyes ovata 600-1200 600-1200 600-1200 Abylopsis tetragona 100-400 0-50 Bassia bassensis 0-100 0-100 0-200 0-50 Tab. 7: Seasonal bathymetric distribution of typical Southern Adriatic Sea open-sea calycophores. Data sources from recent investigations (2002-2004). Tab. 7: Sezonska batimetrijska distribucija tipičnih, v odprtih vodah južnega Jadranskega morja živečih kalikofornih cevkašev. Podatkovni viri: novejše raziskave (2002-2004). Liriope tetraphylla, formerly among the most frequently encountered hydromedusae in the southern Adriatic, has become rare or absent in recent samples. On the other hand, Oceania armata, Amphinema rubra, Leuckartiara octona, Octophialucium funerarium, and Arctopodema australis, are now far more abundant than before. These 5 species are now quite common members of the open southern Adriatic planktonic ecosystem. With the exception of O. armata, all of these species are characteristic of mid-depth and bathypelagic layers. One obvious difference between historical and recent collections is the presence of coastal species in the surface waters of the open southern Adriatic. Hydromedusae of the genera Hydractinia, Boungainvillia, Clytia, and Obelia that were frequently encountered in our older zooplankton samples are now quite rare. There is, however, no substantial difference in the frequency of occurrence of calycophores between historical and recent samples. There is, nonetheless, an indication that cnidarians are generally more abundant in our more recently collected samples. This is especially the case for Rhabdoon singulare, Oceania armata, Octophialucium funerarium, and Arctapodema australis, species that were previously present only in low abundance and are now more abundant or, in some cases, even dominant. Higher abundances were recorded for other species during recent investigations, too. This could be explained by the increase of average temperature in the last decade and its influence on the general increase of plankton abundance, or it may be a sampling artifact associated with more frequent sampling at night. The most common species migrated over a substantial depth range, presumably due to daily changes of ir-radiance and feeding biology. Higher surface layers temperature appeared to be an effective upper barrier for many cnidarians, especially mesopelagic species. Some populations performed migrations that appeared to track light intensity preference. Certain species also characterize given depth ranges. Long-term sampling programs are critical for an understanding of the planktonic species assemblages in the water column. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Ministry of Science, Education and Sport of the R Croatia funded this work, project no. 275-09827053047. We also acknowledge the support of the US National Science Foundation (OCE-O116236). PLANKTONSKI OŽIGALKARJI V ODPRTIH VODAH JUŽNEGA JADRANSKEGA MORJA: PRIMERJAVA PODATKOV IZ PRETEKLIH IN NOVEJŠIH RAZISKAV Davor LUČIČ, Adam BENOVIČ, Ivona ONOFRI, Mirna BATISTIČ, Barbara GANGAI, Marijana MILOSLAVIČ, Vladimir ONOFRI, Jakica NJIRE, Igor BRAUTOVIČ & Dubravka BOJANIČ VAREZIČ University of Dubrovnik, Institute for Marine and Coastal Research, HR-20000 Dubrovnik, Damjana Jude 12, Croatia E-mail: davor.lucic@unidu.hr Mira MOROVIČ Institute for Oceanography and Fisheries, HR-21000 Split, Šetalište I. Meštrovica 63, Croatia Tjaša KOGOVŠEK Marine Biology Station, National Institute of Biology, 6330 Piran, Fornače 41, Slovenia POVZETEK V pričujočem članku avtorji primerjajo podatke iz preteklih (1967-68, 1974-1976, 1993-1995) in novejših raziskav (2002-2004), in sicer o zgradbi, številčnosti, batimetrijski distribuciji in vertikalni migraciji ožigalkarjev v globokih vodah južnega Jadrana. 18 vrst meduz je tipičnih holoplantonskih vrst, živečih v odprtih morjih; vzorci so vedno ali pogosto vsebovali 6 od teh, in sicer Rhabdoon singulare, Aglaura hemistoma, Persa incolorata, Rhopalo-nema velatum, Sminthea eurygaster in Solmissus albescens. Najpogostejši kalikoforni cevkaši so Lensia subtilis, L. meteori, Eudoxoides spiralis, Sphaeronectes gracilis in S. irregularis ter Hippopodius hippopus, Vogtia penthacantha, Lensia conoidea, L. fowleri, Chelophyes appendiculata, Kephyes ovata in Bassia bassensis. Pri primerjanju podatkov iz preteklih in novejših raziskav so bile ugotovljene nekatere razlike v prisotnosti in številčnosti. Ključne besede: južno Jadransko morje, meduze, kalikoforni cevkaši, zgradba, številčnost, batimetrijska distribucija REFERENCES Batistic, M., F. Krsinic, N. Jasprica, M. Caric, D. Vilicic & D. Lucic (2004): Gelatinous invertebrate of the South Adriatic: species composition and vertical distribution. J. Plankton Res., 4, 459-474. Benovic, A (1973): Diurnal vertical migration of Solmis-sus albescens (Hydromedusae) in the southern Adriatic. Mar. Biol., 18, 298-301. Benovic, A. (1976): Hydromedusae (Cnidaria) from two stations in the southern Adriatic and Thyrrenian Seas in the year 1967-1968. P.S.Z.N.I. Mar. Ecol., 40, 1-10. Bender, A. & A. Benovic (1986): Medusae from the open eaters of the Adriatic Sea (1974-1976). Stud. Mar., 17/18, 55-74. Benovic, A. & A. Bender (1987): Seasonal distribution of medusae in the Adriatic Sea. In: Bouillon, J., F. Boero, F. Cicogna & P. F. S. Cornelius (eds.): Modern Trends in the Systematics, Ecology and Evolution of Hydroids and Hydromedusae. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 117-131. Benovic, A. & D. Lucic (1996): Comparison of hydromedusae findings in the northern and southern Adriatic sea. Sci. Mar., 60, 129-135. Benovic, A. & D. Lucic (2001): Jellyfish outbreaks: natural cycle or stress response effect? CIESM, 2001. Gelatinous zooplankton outbreaks: theory and practice. CIESM Workshop Series no 14, pp. 59-62. Benovic, A., D. Justic & A. Bender (1987): Enigmatic changes in the hydromedusan fauna of the northern Adriatic Sea. Nature, 6113, 597-600. Benovic, A., D. Lucic & V. Onofri (2000): Does change in an Adriatic hydromedusan fauna indicate an early phase of marine ecosystem destruction? P.S.Z.N.I. Mar. Ecol., 21, 221-231. Benovic, A., D. Lucic, V. Onofri, M. Batistic & J. Njire (2005): Bathymetric distribution of medusae in the open waters of the middle and south Adriatic Sea during spring 2002. J. Plankton Res., 27, 79-89. Buecher, E., J. Goy, B. Planque, M. Etienne & S. Dallot (1997): Long-term fluctuations of Liriope tetraphylla in Villefranche Bay between 1966 and 1993 compared to Pelagia noctiluca populations. Oceanol. Acta, 20, 145158. Collin, S. P., J. H. Costello & E. Klos (2003): In situ swimming and feeding behavior of eight co-occuring hydromedusae. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 253, 305-309. Gacic, M., G. Civitarese, S. Miserocchi, V. Cardin, A. Crise & E. Mauri (2002): The open-ocean convection in the Southern Adriatic: a controlling mechanism of the spring phytoplankton bloom. Cont. Shelf Res., 22, 18971908. Gacic, M., V. Cardin & V. Kovacevic (2006): Variations of thermal conditions in the southern Adriatic from XBT measurements in the period October 2002 - June 2003. Acta Adriat., 47, 19-31. Gamulin, T. (1966): Contribution to the knowledge of Lensia fowleri (Bigelow) (Siphonophora, Calycophorae). P.S.Z.N.I. Mar. Ecol., 35, 1-6. Gamulin, T. (1968): Les Siphonophores calycophores de la cote orientale de l'Adriatique. Rapp. Comm. Int. Mer Medit., 19, 479-480. Gamulin, T. (1977): Repartition des calycophores en mer Adriatique. Rapp. Comm. Int. Mer Medit., 24, 103-104. Gamulin, T. & F. Krsinic (1993a): Distribution and abundance of Calycophores (Siphonophora, Calycophorae) in the Mediterranean and Adriatic Sea. P.S.Z.N.I. Mar. Ecol., 14, 97-111. Gamulin, T. & F. Krsinic (1993b): On the occurrence of Calycophorae (Siphonophora) in the southern Adriatic and Tyrrhenian Sea: a comparison of the annual cycles off Dubrovnik and Naples. J. Plankton Res., 15, 855865. Gamulin, T. & F. Krsinic (2000): Calycophores (Sipho-nophora, Calycophorae) of the Adriatic and Mediterranean Seas. Nat. Croat., 2, 1-198. Grbec, B., M. Morovic, G. Beg-Paklar, G. Kuspilic, S. Matijevic, F. Matic & Z. Nincevic-Gladan (2009): The relationship between the atmospheric variability and productivity in the Adriatic Sea area. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U. K. doi:1 0.1 01 7/S002531 5409000708. Krsinic, F. & J. Njire (2001): An invasion by Muggiaea atlantica Cunningham 1982 in the northern Adriatic Sea in the summer of 1997 and the fate of small copepods. Acta Adriat., 41, 49-59. Krsinic, F. & B. Grbec (2006): Horizontal distribution of tintinnids in the open waters of the South Adriatic (Eastern Mediterranean). Sci. Mar., 70, 77-88. Lucic, D., A. Benovic, M. Batistic, J. Njire & V. Onofri (2005): Calycophorae (Siphonophora) in the open waters of the Central and Southern Adriatic Sea during spring 2002. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U. K., 85, 495-501. Lucic, D., A. Benovic, M. Batistic, M. Morovic & I. Onofri (2009): Diel vertical migration of medusae in the open Southern Adriatic Sea over a short time period (July 2003). Mar. Ecol., 30, 16-32. Milos, C. (2009): Biometry and elemental analysis of Scyphomedusae in the Golf of Trieste with emphasis on RK/zostoma pu/mo. M.Sc. Thesis. Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, 72 p. Molinero, J. C., M. Casini & E. Buecher (2008): The influence of the Atlantic and regional climate variability on the long-term changes in gelatinous carnivore populations in the northwestern Mediterranean. Limnol. Oceanogr., 53, 1456-1467. Morovic, M., F. Matic, B. Grbec, V. Dadic, & D. Ivan-kovic (2006): South Adriatic phenomena observable through VOS XBT and other ADRICOSM data. Acta Adriat., 47, 33-49. Persad, G., R. H. Hapcroft, M. K. Webber & J. C. Roff (2003): Abundance, biomass and production of cteno- phores and medusae off Kingston, Jamaica. Bull. Mar. Sci., 73, 379-396. Pugh, P. R. (2006): Reclassification of the clausophyd siphonophorae C/ausopKyes ovafa into the genus .epKyes gen. nov. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U. K., 86, 9971004. Purcell, J. E. (2005): Climate effects on formation of jellyfish and ctenophore blooms: a review. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U. K., 85, 461-476. Raskoff, K. A. (2002): Foraging, prey capture, and gut contents of the mesopelgic narcomedusa So/m/ssus spp. (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa). Mar. Biol., 141, 1009-1107. Richardson, A. J., A. Bakun, G. C. Hays & M. J. Gibbons (2009): The jellyfish joyride: causes, consequences and management responses to a more gelatinous future. Trends Ecol. Evol., 24, 312-322. Vilibic, I. & M. Orlic (2001): Least-squares tracer analysis of water masses in the South Adriatic (1967-1990). Deep-Sea Res. Part I, 48, 2297-2330. Youngbluth, M., T. Srrners, A. Hosia & L. Stemmann (2008): Vertical distribution and relative abundance of gelatinous zooplankton, /'n s/fu observations near the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Deep-Sea Res. Part II, 55, 1 19-125.