AN INFORMATIONAL APPROACH OF INFORMATICA 2/92 BEING-THERE AS UNDERSTANDING i r Keywords: Heideggerian Being-there information, Anton P. Železnikar informational formulas, philosophy, text formalization, Volaričeva ulica 8 understanding 61111 Ljubljana This text is a continuation of the essay pertaining to the formalization of texts and, in particular, to Heideggerian philosophy of Being-there as understanding [BT, §31]. To the text paragraphs 1 to 15 in the previous part, in this continuation, paragraphs 16 to 18 are formalized in a sentence by sentence fashion. In Section 3 of this continuation, paragraphs as a whole are treated. First, the informational connection among sentences is explained via the metaphysical link between the equally marked operand and operator entities in different formula systems of text sentences. This type of informational connectedness are supplementary formulas of the kind a\= a, (x\= (p(a), etc , vvhere a' s on the left and the right side of operator \= belong to different sentence formulas. Then, aH 18 paragraphs are presented by 18 formula systems together with the Greek operand, Frakmr operand, and operator lists. These lists include data on formal entities appearances in particular sentence formulas. Lastly, paragraph systems can be composed into a unique formula system depicting the so-called initial informational program of §)31 in [BT]. The problem which pertains to the same operands appearing on different places in informational formulas is discussed exhaustively and in a formalized way in Section 5.1 . At the end of the essay a dictionary of used operands and operators is appended, however, in this part of the essay, only the Greek operands are listed. The presented formula system of the text of §31 [BT] is in no way a final decision. Improvements can be made through considering the original German text [SZ] and also translations of this text into other languages, for instance, [BV]. Informacijski pristop k biti-tu kot razumevanju H* To besedilo je nadaljevanje spisa, ki obravnava formalizacijo besedil in še posebej, Heideggrovo filozofijo biti-m kot razumevanje [BT, §31]. V tem delu so k prejšnjim odstavkom 1-15 formalizirani še odstavki 16-18 poglavja 31, in sicer postopno, stavek za stavkom. V poglavju 3 tega spisa so prikazani odstavki besedila kot formalizirane celote. Najprej se pojasnjujejo informacijske povezave med stavki s pomočjo metafizičnih oblik med enako označenimi opemadnimi in operatorskimi entitetami, ki nastopajo v različnih formulskih sistemih stavkov besedila. Ta vrsta informacijske povezanosti so dodatne formule oblike a |= a, a 1= (p(a, itd., kjer entitete, označene z a, na levi in desni strani operatorja \= pripadajo različnim stavčnim formulam. Nato je vseh 18 odstavkov predstavljenih z 18 formulskimi sistemi, skupaj s seznami grških in fraktumih operandov ter operatorjev. Ti seznami vključujejo podatke o pojavitvah formalnih entitet v posameznih stavčnih formulah. Naposled so odstavčni sistemi združeni v edinstveni informacijski sistem, ki je upodobitev t.i. začemega informacijskega programa za besedilo §31 v [BT]. Problem pojavljanja enih in istih operandov na različnih mestih v informacijskih formulah je obravnavan izčrpno in na formaliziran način v odstavku 5.1 . Na koncu spisa je dodan slovar uporabljenih operandov in operatorjev, vendar v tem delu le za grške operande. Opisani formulski sistem besedila 18531 [BT] nikakor ni končna verzija. Izboljšave sistema so mogoče ob upoštevanju izvirnega nemškega besedila [SZ] pa mdi prevodov besedila v druge jezike, npr. [BV]. *This essay is a pri vate author's work and no part of it may be used, reproduced or translated in any manner whatsoever vvithout vvritten permission except in the čase of brief quotations embodied in cri tičal articles 2.16. THE SIKTEENTH PARAGRAPH OF § 31 fBTJ [16.1] The disclosedness of the "there" [Odis­close('^there)] ^^ understanding is itself a way of Dasein' s potentiality-for-Bein g [5Bway(Trfor-BeingC®)))]­ Informational formula for this sentence is, for instance, (16.1) (^discloseCT^Uiere) ^'^)\= (^disclose(''^there) N ®way(^for-Being(®))) • [16.2] In the way [C 5Bvvay] i" vvhich its Being [^(^disclose)] is projected both upon [[=project­°Nupon] the "for-the- sake-of-which" [(jPsakel ^"^ upon significance (the world) [CTsign(9Bworld)]. there lies [Cjig] the disclosedness of Being in gen­eral [9disclose(®) Ngenerall- For this sentence the following formula can be posited: [Nhavel understanding of Being [11(83)], and has this as constimtive for its Being [[=const ®(o')]­One can posit the following formula in ac­cord with the last sentence: (16.5) (^(83(a)) f=essen ^project(*in-tlie-world)) ^ (« Nhave (m) Nconst «(«))) • [16.6] What [SJvvhatl w ^ posited dogmatically [Nposit°Ndogmal »t an earlier stage [astage(Searly)] now gets [^no^oj^get] exhibited [Seshibitl ^ terms of the Constimtion of the Being [Econst(55)] iu which Dasein as understanding is its "there" [Tthere( (l?(93)|=(U^=^ith6nu„d))) ; (((Oone Pd o '^so/ Fi n 9phenomenal (°'adequate(^way ))) Nto 9fiill(^disclose('^there))) = ^ C^one r^must°Pwork_oiit Tconcrete(''^diis(t^niulti(Sexist)))) As we see, the last formula is an implicative ex­pression.with three components in its premise. By diis formula our informational investigation of the Heideggerian Being-there as understanding is completed so far. D 3. FORMULA SYSTEMS OF PARAGRAPHS AS INFORMATIONAL ENTITIES 3.0. PARA GRAPHS AS INFORMA TIONAL ENTIRETIES What is the informing between sentences of a particular paragraph, their mutual »communica­tion«? We have to say more in concem to this communicative, that is, informational connected­ness; how does it arise and which forms does it take at ali? How does a paragraph of sentences inform in its entirety? Is this connectedness of sentences in a paragraph automatic, that is, conditioned in an axiomatic way? What is the essential difference between a mathematical and an informational con­nectedness of this type? The answer is that the connectedness among informational formulas is posited axiomatically, so, one does not need to describe this connected­ness explicitly, by additional formulas. This con­nectedness is always metaphysical, where the basic connective form a |= a can be decomposed [FIP] anew, in a specific way and never definitely, in each particular čase of connectedness. The ques­tion is what is the subject of informational impact among formulas possessing particular markers of the one and the same operand? We shall discuss this matter more exhaustively in section 5. L Let us comment the informational formula systems in the paragraph by paragraph manner. In this čase we proceed systematically, so, we point out the following facts in the framework of a paragraph informational system: (1) operands, (2) operators, and (3) operand informational connec­tions in single and in different formulas of the paragraph system. This information might be rel­evant in respect to the possibilities of further (in­formational) development of the paragraph systems (PS). Operands of a PS can be found in the Operand Dictionary, where they are explained ver­bally and in the shortest form in English, German, and Slovene. These operands perform as regular informational entities which inform and are in­formed. Certainly, they could be formalized ini­tially, additionally, and fundamentally, that is, foundationally. We shall show the operand con­nectedness by the references of formulas in which they appear. Operators of a paragraph formula system will be listed together with information in vvhich formulas of the system do they appear. The shortest verbal explanation (in English, German, and Slovene) of particular informational operators will be found in the Operator Dictionary at the end of the essay. The metaphysical connections of the type a f= a, a 1= 9(a), ... will be listed together with operands and sometimes discussed separately. Another aspect of the formalistic treatment of sentences in a paragraph is to observe and clas­sify the so-called input, output, and processing (understanding) informational operands. It may happen that a paragraph is not a complete informa­tional system in the sense of its input and output informational variables and in the sense of input-output processing variables vvhich ali together con­stitute an »informational machine«. Some parts of such informational system may be »distributed« in other paragraphs, thus, only the entire section of paragraphs is, for instance, more or less a complete system, but, certainly, remaining informationally open for informing (in the sense of operand »sig­naling«) and structural impacts onto the already established informational system. At this point the traditional linguistic theory encounters a new, un­common »sight« of the problem vvhich may sub­stantially exceed the domain of the linguistic semiotics as a scientific discipline. Namely, the new substance of the problem concems the domain of informational arising. 3A.A FORMULA SYSTEM OF THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF §J / fBT] The informational formula system of the first para­graph is the folloNving: (1 • 1) ®mind ^ °^exist' (®there \= <^exist) \= ®there"' (1.2) (Smind, *^ l^const ^there) r^equi_p' (1.3) (U ^always ^mind) Psupp' (1.4) 5IR(U)C^^aysU; (1.5) %) C S); fibasic e %)•­ ((%)Nint ^ ) N Sfund) =^ (i^basic ^ %)): (1.6) ((«1 ^ ^cogn) Fint "exist) ^ ^prini' •^iJiere P v^prim ^ ^diere)' U9^®expl This system is the initial (texmal) informational program corresponding to the first paragraph. To this program one can imagine the so-called diction­ary (library) of informational operands being in­formationally determined as basic informational programs in operand dictionary. This dictionary can be understood to be a regular part of the so-called operating system of an informational ma­chine which performs the informing in a dedicated field, for instance, informing of Being- there as understanding. Further, we must not forget that operators, in a given formula simation, pertain always to concrete operands, particularizing operands' specific faculties of informing. And last but not least, metaphysical connections of a for­mula system have to be pointed out with the aim to offer possibilities for a further metaphysical de­composition of the formula system. Let us show the appearing operands for para­graph (1) in the Greek and Fraktar alphabetical order and the occurring operators: •'exist' 1.6; Sftrnd: 1-5; t^basic" l'-^' 1--^' ''exist-1.1,1.1 ; Q53)OrS8(S)): 1.5, 1.5; »there: l-L l-L 1-2, 1.6, 1.6; D: 1.5; ®, expl-1.6; j^cogn: 1.6; aR: 1.4; 2R(U):1.4; vf^j,^: lA, 1.2, 1.3; U:1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6;Aprini:1.6; \=: 1.1,1.5,1.6 ; Pconst^ 1.2; Pequi_p" 1-^' Nint^ 1-5, 1.6; Psupp- 1-3; =^: 1.5; C: 1.5, 1.6; ^always" ^••^' ^•^' L : 1.1, 1.5, 1.6; ^: 1.6; . Additional formulas for a possible supplementary metaphysical decomposition are: •^6X151^*^6X151: l-l l-l ' ®th6r6N%6re: 1-1 —l-l', Sniind N ®niind: 1.1-1.2-1.3 ; 9Jl(U) ^ U: 1.4 and connections to other occur­rences of U and vice versa; U\=V.: 1.2-1.3-1.41.5—1. 6 etc. These and other formulas can be used for the supplementary explanation of the formula system (1). As we see, entities Being-there »there ^^^ understanding U dominate in the first paragraph formula system. It seems that this paragraph determines, in part, the kemel part of the under­standing system and that something to be under­stoo d and the characteristi c result s of understanding (for instance, meaning, signifi­cance, etc. of something) are postponed to the informational game of concemed entities to for­mula systems of paragraphs which follovv. 3.2. A FORMULA SYSTEM OF THE SECOND PARAGRAPH OF §J7 fBT] The formula system for the second paragraph is (2.1) [Acomment]; (2.2) (@ ^ ; ^ S)) ^ TthereO)) ^^(^vvorldNT^diere); ®diere(®world) t= ®m'. (2.3) (53inN'rdiere)=»(®NNS)) ; (2.4) ((*in-th6-world Ndiscl ^ ) ^ ^5ak6' 9sake => ((((S)f=;[=®)h=Tthere(®))<^ (®world t= "^there))' (®diere(9Bworld) N «in); ((93inNtdiere)=^(®NNS)))) ; (2.5) (^sign ^ U(9sake)) Ndiscl^ (2.6) ((U Ndiscl) Nas ("(9sake Pdiscl' ssign Pdiscl)) ~^6qiii_p '°in-die-worId» (2.7) ^world(^5ign) Ndiscl ^world'' (2.8) (95ake' ^5ign Qiscl ^) ' ^ ((S> Nas ®in-the-world) N S)) Let us see the list of informational operands and operators in the last system: ^sign- 2.5 , 2.6, 2.7, 2.8; T^j^ere- 2-2, 2.3 , 2.4, 2.4; Tthere(S3): 2.2, 2.4; (Psake: 2.4, 2.4, 2.5 , 2.6, 2.8; % : 2.2, 2.3 , 2.4, 2.4; ^in-the-world: 2.4, 2.6, 2.8; %ere : 2.2, 2.4; 58there(2Bworld): 2.2, 2.4; ®: 2.2, 2.2, 2.3 , 2.3 , 2.4, 2.4, 2.8, 2.8; U: 2.6, 2.6; UCcps^ke): 2.5; m^oM- 2.2, 2.4, 2.7; ®world(^sign): 2.7; [IZ:: 2.2, 2.3 , 2.4, 2.8; [=35: 2.6, 2.8; Ndisci: 2.4, 2.5 , 2.6, 2.7; C: 2.4, 2.5 ; Cjisci: 2.8; ^ : 2.3 , 2.4; <^ : 2.2, 2.8; ^equi_p" 2.6 Possible metaphysical informing between and within formulas can be added in a spontaneous way, according to the initial formula situations. 3.3. A FORMULA SYSTEM OF THE THIRD PARAGRAPH OF §57 fBTJ Formulas of the third paragraph constitute a part of the understanding system, that is. (3.1) Font.some (ll(a) \= (tJsign(Nable_nian «) . (3.2) t^sign(pmatch <^)' t^sign(pcomp Of)))? (®what Ncomp a; 33 Nas ( « N? N ®)) <= (3.3) ("• Nas Sexist)» (3.4) ((^(83) C S) Nas ^for-Being) Cexist ^J (^ M;omp (-^ b^ ^present-at-hand)) Nextra' (3.5) (^ Nprim 33possible) > (3.6) (2)N(®N;N2)))N^(S)); ((-' Npertain ^for-Being) Npertaiii ^ ) ^alway s (('Opossible Nessen_for •^) Npertain (((^solicitude(®) Nfo r w) ; (3.7) (7i:(3) Nconce m 2Bworld)) Hchar)) : (((2) C 93possible) Nexist) 7^sharply ((^log Nempty ) > Tcont(°'present-at-hand))) (3.8) *^so-far-as y^ N "^present-at-hand) (Tmdaal(^at-hand/) Ha s ( ^ Nsig n ((o' Nact)' ( a N '^at_any_tinie)))' (3.9) 7t p=char ^merely_poss' (3.10) (TT Nont '^lovver) Nthan (»act-^) ' (3.11) (7t Nas Sexist) IN ((Nchar 2)) C Uway) Nont' (3.12) 7rNas(®existN;N®exist); (3.13) (U Nas ^for-Being) Nprov ((9basis ^'^)\= 9basis) From the last formula system we can extract infor­ mational operands and operators in the form of the folIowing list: a:3.1,3.1,3.2 , 3.4, 3.7, 3.8, 3.8; O'^act'3.10; '^merely_poss* 3." . O^present-at-hand* •'•4» •^•'» Tcont('-*^present-at-hand)- -'•' ' Tniodal(^present-at-hand)' 3.o. ^exist* •^•2, 3.11; '^lovver* 3.1U, Usigii: 3.1 , 3.1 ; v: 3.10; "^''at_any_time-^•°' 7r:3.8, 3.9, 3.10, 3.11,3.12 , 3.13; Tc(S)): 3.5, 3.6; ^for-Being^ 3.3 , 3.6, 3.13; Ttiog: 3.7; TTat.hai^d- 3-8; ^solicitude(®)- 3-6; Wway' 3.11 , 3.11 ; 9basis-3.13, 3.13; co: 3.6; 93:3.2,3.2,3.3 ; 93, possible* 3.4,3.6,3.7 ; S : 3.3 , 3.4, 3.4, 3.5, 3.5, 3.6, 3.6, 3.7; ®exi«:t- 3.12, 3.12; J?: 3.J'. 11:3.1,3.2,3.3,3.13 ; lt(a): 3.1 ; ^what: 3.2; 3Bworld: 3.6; N:3.1,3.2 , 3.5,3.12 , 3.13; Nable_nian' •'•^' Nas:3.2 , 3.11,3.12 , 3. 13; Nchar- 3.9, 3.11 , Ncomp" 3.1 ; Nconcem- 3-6; Nempty" 3.' ; Nessen_for- 3.6; Nexist- 3- ' j Nextra' 3.4; Nfor: 3.6; Nniatch- 3.1 ; |=:ont: 3.10, 3.11 ; Nont,some" 3.1 . Npertain-3.6; Nprim- 3.4; Nprov- 3.13, Nsign- -'-° ' Nthan^ 3.10; N : 3.4, 3.8; Nact^ 3.8; Ncomp- 3.2; ^as- 3.0, Hchar- -'•"» IN" 3.11; C:3.2, 3.3 , 3.7,3.11 ; ^always- 3-6 , C *-conip- • 3 4- •^-^' ^xist -•^••^' ^so-far-as- 3.7; 7^sharply: 3. 7 In this way, the survey of the involved informa­tional entities of the third paragraph is completed. 3.4. A FORMULA SYSTEM OF THE FOURTH PARAGRAPH OF §57 [BTJ The fourth paragraph is constituted by the follow­ing formula system: (4.1) (jz Pa s Lexist) Msign ((^fo r-Being N ' N '^for-Being) f= ^sense(^liber( ^ indiff))) ­ (4.2) (Sniind ^essen (4.3) ( S t=as (^for-Being N^ N ^for-Being)) Ppass_by (^v''^for-Being)' -' Fwaive K(93(S))); (®Nseize^(«(S))))N(^niistake; (4.4) (p(4.3) < ^ ((((S) \= OSpossible) Ndeliver S)) P ^throvvn)) Pthrough' (4.5) (S) 1= 7r(®free)) Nfor ^for-BeingC®); (4.6) (58possibIe@) N traiis ^poss_ways The list of informational operands and operators appearing in this formula system is: '^poss_ways* ^-O, :4.1 ; -exist I-indiff: 4.1 ; ^liber^ 4.1 ; ^liberC!-indiff)" 4.1 ; M-niistake- 4-3 ; 7r:4.1,4.3 , 4.3 , 4.5 ; 7r(53(S))): 4.3 , 4.3 ; TTdef: 4.2 ; ^for-Being: 4.1-, 4.1 , 4.3 , 4.3 ; 4.5 ; ^for-Being(S)): 4.5 ; 7r(S8free): 4.5 ; ^thrown" 4.4 ; ^sense'4.1 ; c^senseC^IiberCt-indiff)): 4.1 ; 9(3.4): 4.4 ; 93: 4.3 ; 95(2)): 4.3 , 4.3 ; %ee : 4.5 ; •^TKJSsible* ^•^> 4.0 ; S3possible(®): 4.6 ; ®: 4.2 , 4.2 , 4.3 , 4.3 , 4.4 , 4.4 , 4.5 , 4.5 , 4.6 , 4.6; ©nund^ 4.2 ; |=:4.1,4.3 , 4.4 , 4.5 , 4.6 ; Falready"- 4.2 ; Pas* 4.1 , 4 . J ; Pdeliver- 4.4 ; Nfor: 4.5 ; Pseize' 4.3 ; Fpass_by* •^' Pthrough^ 4.4 ; Ptrans- 4.6 ; Pvvaive* 4-3 ; Psign^ 4.1 ; C: 4.2 ; :4.2; -essen <^:4. 4 So, the operand and operator list is completed. 3.5. A FORMULA SVSTEM OF THE FIFTH PARAGRAPH OF §57 [BTJ The formula system of the fifth paragraph is con­stituted by the follovving seven formula subsys­tems: (5.1) (U ^ 93(7tfor.Being)) N^ (•^still-out Pas_not_yet ^at_hand)' ((93(7tfor-Being) Nas ^) Messen ^at_hand) ^^i, „ (93(®) C ^exist/' (5.2) (2) V (S) Hu; S) ^y)) N O N ; t= ®); (5.3) (S)NasU)l=know((S)Ncap) . ^for-Being (S)) Ncap); (5.4) ^know(®)Nfirst^inini(®); ^know(S)) C (93(Tthere) Nessential ^) ' (5.5) (((S) 1= U) t= S)) 1= TthereO)) = » Nastray' ® t=faiLto_recognize S)); (5. o) ((U [=accomp_by ^niind) Pexist_surr "^tliroNvn) ^ (®Vaiready(S)|=astray®; ® Nfail. .to_recognize S))); (5.7) o C TTfor-BeingO)) Ndeliver (^(® |=first_find S)) C 7t(®)) Operands and operators of the system are : a : 5.1 ; »still-out^ 5.1 ; 7r: 5.7 , 5.7 ; TTatjjand^ ^-l'^-l ' 7r(®): 5.7 , 5.7 ; 7r(S) [=first_find ®): 5.7 ; ^for-Being^ 5.1 , 5.1 , 5.3 , 5.7 ; 7i:for-Being(®): 5.7 ; a, exist :5.1 ; ''^there- 5-5 ; 'fthereC®): 5.5 ; ''^thrown- •^•"» 93:5.1,5.1,5.4 ; 93(2)): 5.1 ; ®(^for-Being): 5.1 , 5.1 ; 93(Tthere): 5.4 ; S : 5.2 , 5.2 , 5.3 , 5.3 , 5.4 , 5.4 , 5.5 , 5.5 , 5.6 , 5.6 , 5.7 , 5.7 ; ^know: 5.4 , 5.4 ; ^know(®): 5.4 , 5.4 ; ^i^: 5.4 ; ^inirnO) : 5.4 ; e^^d­ 5-6; 11:5.1,5.3,5.4,5.6 ; |= : 5.1 , 5.2 , 5.5 ; Paccomp_by- -*•"' Pas* J-A, J.J , Pas_not_yet' -'•I * Pastray- 5.5> 5.6 ; Pcap- 5.3 ; Pdeliver- ^-' i Pessential' -^-4^ Pexist_surr: 5.6 ; Pfail_to_recognize' ^•^' ^•"' Pfirst_find- 5.7 ; Pknovv- 5.3 ; Nu : 5.2; Fwith- 5.1 ; [7^:5.1; Pessen- 5.1; l=5^first: 5.4; N^u: 5.2; C: 5.1 , 5.4, 5.7; ^ : 5.5, 5.6; V: 5.2; '^already' 5.6 In this list, entity 7t(S [=first_find N^) should be mentioned as a complex functional possibility TT. 3.6. A FORMULA SYSTEM OF THE SFKTH PARAGRAPH OF §57 [BT] Within this paragraph only one sentence is consid­ered since the second one is taken as a suppressed comment: (((a C SB^orld) => (« Nfree « » (7r(a) [=free «)) ; (7.4) ( a [=2 -as ^service(^)' '^ r^as •'^use(°')' '^ Pa s ^detriment('^)) Pdiscover_as (aN^to-hand) ; (7.5) (SBcategorial Preveal_as '^total(^involve)/ Po f ^interconn(™to-hand)' (7.6) (Ndisčl ^(^imity))) =^ (pdiscover (^mity(t^nianifold('^at-hand))' ^uiity(9^))); (7.7) ((^question Pabout (^(•'O Paim_at Tcond(^(33(9^))))) Naccid) Nquest; (7.8) 9(7.7) Nqiiest ®what; (7.9) (Ncoiifront (9(7.7) Nquest °0) =^ ((((a t^Tchar(®))N u «(«))< = (Tcond(^(°^)) Ndiscl O')) Nwhy); (7.10) [An insignificant comment] ; (7.11) [A comment] (6.1) ((U [= 58exist((® N TCfor-Being(S))) N S) ) Pdiscl -°exist/ Pca p ^what(-°exist)' (6.2) [A comment to that what has to follow] In short, there is: ^for-Being- "•! ; ^for-Being(®): 6.1 ; «exist:6.1,6.1 ; S : 6.1 , 6.1 ; U:6.1 ; 2Bwhat: 6.1 ; ®what(«exist):6.1; N6.1; Pcap- 6.1 ; hdisci: 6.1 The analysis of this paragraph as a whole can bring new views of its role witliin the understanding system. 3.7. >l FORMULA SYSTEM OF THE SEVENTH PARAGRAPH OF §57 [BTJ Th e sevent h paragrap h is informationall y described by the system of the first nine sentences' subsystems: (7.1) (ll^as%scl ) "pertain ^basic_state(^in-the-world)» (7.2) (OSjn t=as ^for(®in-the-world)» (7.3) ((5Bworld Pa s ^^"world) Pdiscl ssign_poss) Nbut Th e list of operands and operators is as follows: a:7.3 , 7.3,7.4 , 7.4 , 7.9 , 7.9 ; Tchar: 7.9 ; TcharO): 7.9 ; Tcond' '•' ' '•9 ; Tcond(^(a)): 7.9 ; Tcond(^(58(?R))): 7.7 ; ''in volve' '•5> ^niaiiifold- 7.6 ; f^manifold(^at-hand): 7.6 ; 7T: 7.3 , 7.6 , 7.7 , 7.9 ; ^sign_poss" ' •-'' 7r(a): 7.3 , 7.9 ; ummy. 7.7; ^(^inity): 7.6 ; ^at-hand^ 7.6 ; Ttfor: 7.2 ; ^for(®in-die-world)- 7.2 ; ^interconn- '•5» ^interconn(™to-hand/' '•^•> '^total- 7.5 ; '^total(''invoIve))' '•5 ; U'imity : 7.6; ^unity(t^niaiiifold(^at-hand))- 7.6 ; Uiu,i,y(?R): 7.6 ; 9(7.7): 7.8 , 7.9 ; detriment 7.4; ^detriment('^)" 7.4 ; 91, (a) : 7.4 ; servicc 7.4; service •^use" '•'*; 9ru3e(a): 7.4 ; 93:7.7,7.9 ; 93(a): 7.9 ; «8(in): 7.7 ; 58i„: 7.2 ; An-die-vvorld* '-1 ' '•^' ®: 7.9 ; %sci : 7.1 ; ^: 7.6 , 7.7 ; n • *-'qiiestion' • 7 7-' •'» ^to-hand" '•4» '.5 ; 11:7.1; ®basic_state" 7-1 ; ^basic state(®in-the-world)- 7.1 ; 28, tategorial :7.5 ; 5Bwhat: 7.8 ; ®worId- 7.3 , 7.3 ; \=: 7.4 ; 7.7; "about Faccid" '•' ' Paim_at' '•'> ^as:7.1,7.2,7.3,7.4;i:=but:7.3; Nconfront-'•"» Ndiscl-^-3 ' 7.6, 7.9; r^discover_as" '-^^ 7.6; t=free-7-3; Nof: 7.5; \=^,,^,^: 7.7, 7.8, 7.9; Preveal_as* 7-5; p•^: 7.9; Nwhy: 7.9; [7^: 7.9; C: 7.3; =»: 7.3, 7.6, 7.9; 4=: 7.9; ^pgj^ain: 7.1 This paragraph is evidently active in an input, output, and processing (understanding) way. 3.8. A FORMULA SVSTEM OF THE EIGHTH PARA GRAPH OF §i / [BTJ The eighth paragraph is depicted by the fpllowing formula system: (8.1) (((Ldim(a ^ ) (=alLpress_for ^) \= ^) r^quest -^why! ((a \= Sdim) N a) N Ldim(a); (^ Qiscl Sdim(a)) "^discl ^ ' (8.2) ((c^eKist'-^) N ^project) =^ 9(8.1);" (8.3) .upon (9sake(^). ^sign Nas ®worldhood(®cur_world(1i))) 5 (8.4) v(TcharW Fas ''^project) Fconst '°in_the-world) Pwith_regard •^discl(®of-Being(Tchar(^)) Nexist_const) '•> (TcharC^) Nby 9fact(^for-Being)) Nget ^leeway (TcharC*-^))' (8.5) ^~' Pas '^thrown) Pthrown (^(93)|=fPproject); (8.6) rproject P (^comportv^oneself) Ptowards vvPthink_out '^plan) Haccord(®Narr«(®)))); (8.7) ® Ncontra ((® Nas ®) Nproject §)); ((i)^;l=S))|= (8.8) as_long_as (((® h ; N S) Nas_long_as S) Nal.underst (8.9) s)Nas^(®); (TcharW N Rproject) N «; (8.10) ^ p^grasp_theina ((tl(a) h project a), 7t); (®grasp(U) N m_nianner 9(8.9)) Ntake..away ((^ 1= ^roject(a)) Nas 7r(Tchar(11))); ®grasp(" Nreduce ( " Nto Tcontent(t^mind)); Tt,project) N ((TI |=as 7t) [=; 1= (TU ]=^ 7t)); CC^project ^ ^throw) Nthrow_before (8.11) d N (^(U) Nas ^(U))) C ((U Nas Voject) N ^(53(S)))) In this system the following operands and operators appear: a: 8.1, 8.1, 8.9, 8.9, 8.9, 8.10; Tchar--8.4, 8.4, 8.9, 8.10; Tchar(U):8.4, 8.4, 8.9, 8.10; Tcontent" 8-10; Tcontent(M^nund)' 8.10; Sdinv 8.1, 8.1; Ldim(a):8.1; Ldini(°^ Qiscl 11): 8.1; O^isci: 8.4; •9discl(®of-Being(Tchar(^)) Nexist_const): 8.4; Xleeway:8.4; ^leeway(Tchar(^)): 8.4; t^niind-8.10; L,sign" 8.3; 7t: 8.1, 8.8, 8.9, 8.10, 8.10, 8.11; ^(Tchar(U)):8.10; 7r(S)): 8.8; •rt(U): 8.11; ^for-Being* 8.4; ^piaiv 8.6; Voject:8.2, 8.4, 8.9, 8.10, 8.10; ^exist* "•'^' ''^throvvn* °-~>y 9fact: 8.4; 9fact(^for-Being): 8.4; 9sake-8.3; 9sake(^)-8.3; 9(8.1): 8.2; ^(gg): 8.10; ^oneself^ 8.6; 93:8.3,8.6,8.11; 53(2)): 8.3,8.6,8.11; ®in-the-world: 8.4; S,comport 8.6; ^coniport('^oneself): 8.6; ©: 8.3, 8.5, 8.6, 8.7, 8.7, 8.8, 8.8, 8.11; ®grasp: 8.10, 8.10; ®grasp(U): 8.10, 8.10; ^ : 8.5,8.11; 5?(93): 8.5; ^(83(2))): 8.11; ^project:8.5, 8.6, 8.7, 8.10, 8.11; Voject(«):8.10; ©of-Being: 8.4; ®of-Being(Tchar(^)): 8.4; Sf^rov: 8.10; U: 8.1, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.3, 8.4, 8.4, 8.5, 8.5, 8.9, 8.9; 8.10, 8.10, 8.11,8.11; U(a): 8.9; 2Bcur_world: 8.3; ^cur_world(^): 8.3; 2Bwhy: 8.1; -^worldhood' "•3*> ^worldhood(^cur_world(^))' 8.3; [=:8.2, 8.5, 8.7, 8.8, 8.9, 8.10; NalLpress.for^ 8.1; NaLunderst-8-8; Nan-: 8.6; \=^: 8.3, 8.4, 8.5, 8.7, 8.8, 8.10, 8.11; Nas_long_as' 8.7, 8.8; Pby: 8.4; Nconst* 8.4; Pcontra-"-'' Nexist_const* 8.4; Nget-°-^» Nin_manner'8.10; pproject-"•'> °-"' hproj_upon' 8.3; Pquest - °-^' Rreduce- o-l^ ; Ptake_away- 8. lU; t=think_out' ^-^ i Fthrow_before- o-"-' ! Ko : 8.10; Pthrown" °'-' ' F^tovvards' °-" ' F^witli_cq_p: o--^' pwith_regard' °-^ ' M: 8.6; F^grasp_tlienia' °-" ' Haccorci: 8.6 ; C:8.2 , 8.10 , 8.11 ; Cdiscb 8.1 ; =^:8. 2 The eighth paragraph is one of the most complex one. Several informational curiosities can be ob­served. For instance, a as something which is the object of understanding, that is, a kind of input variable, becomes as object informed within the systemof understanding. This is the phenomenon of the so-called understanding internalization of an extemal, in fact, only observed entity by different ontological entities (for instance, Being. Dasein, projection, projecting, possibilities, significance, etc.) and, certainly, by understanding as the key entity in this context. Various, to the understanding related entities arise as a kind of output variables, including with those, which could be viewed as the intemal processing devices. For instance, projec­tion, projecting, significance and understanding, ali together arise in the process of Being-there as understanding. And counter-informationally, this is trne also for the so-called basic constitutive entities, as there are Being, Dasein, possibilities, etc. as completely open entities in the realm of Being and tirne. It is also important to mention the function of informational operators. At this point of under­standing, the general informational operator j= (the operational joker of an informational realm) is always an attribute which offers to the involved operands the possibility of the accessibility of the entire informational background. In short, vvithin the formalization of the eighth paragraph, with experience obtained through the informational analysis of the text, new possibilities of under­standing a text in an informational sense are com­ing to the consciousness, opening the perspective of fiirther, yet nontraditional (notmerely linguistic or semiotic) kind of informational investigation. Wtthin this perspective, the informational of a text is not only a classical analysis and synthesis of the meaning; it comprises the informational arising. 3.9. A FORMULA SYSTEM OF THE NINTH PARAGRAPH OF §i / fBTJ The ninth paragraph constitute the following four formula systems: (9-1 ) (OoneNable ((^one r^niake v''inventory'^) F^as <^at_hand))' (Oone Nlist Tcontem(*(®))))) =» ((^existv^project) Rconst "(-o) ) = ? ((® l=constaHtly l^more(®)) Nthaii ( ^ Nfacnially' Nfacuially ®))) ; (9.2) (S) N^niore_thaii C^ Nfactically)) <^ (^for-Being(®) ^essen 9fact(®)); (9.3) ( O ha s Vssible ) N^less « ) Nyet ®: (S) Nexist a ) Ni n (® Nye t ^^for-BcingC®)); (9.4) ((S(Tthere) l=say »(^there) ) Nsay_with ^(^(."^thert))) Ponly_because ((58(T(iigre) preceiv e Ntlirough (("• ' Tcharv^) Pa s ^project)' (^(^there) N ; N «(^there) ; 7Lia3(Tthere);Q3(^there)?N))) The appearance of operands and operators in the last formula system is the following: a: 9.3, 9.3; ^atjiand : 9.1 ; Tchar^ "•'*' Tchar(U): 9.4 ; Tconst(33('rthere)): 9.4 ; Tconst-"•^ ' Tcontent(58(3))):9.1; Tcontent-"•^ ' 9.1; 2exist(^proJect): 9.1 ; -exist ''inventory -'•^' ''inventoryv--'): "-I , (-*more' "•' » timore(S)):9.1 ; Oone: 9.1 , 9.1; ^for-Being: 9.2 , 9.3 ; ^for-Being(®): 9.2, 9.3; ^project: 9.1 , 9.4 ; Tthere: 9.4, 9.4; (pf^a- 9-2; (Pfact(S)): 9.2; 58:9.1,9.1,9.4,9.4 ; 83(®):9.1 ; «(Tthere): 9.4 , 9.4 ; 93possible: 9-3 ; S : 9.1 , 9.1 , 9.2 , 9.2,9.3,9.3 ; ^:9.1 ; ^(93) : 9.1 ; U: 9.4 , 9.4 ; Umr^^,^): 9.4; 1=: 9.4; Nable: 9.1 ; Ks : 9.1 , 9.3, 9.4; Pconst - 9.1 ; Pconstantly- "-I I Pexist : 9.3 , Pfactiially: 9-1 , 9.2 ; Nin: 9.3; hist:9.1 ; Nniake: 9.1", r^only_because- "•'* ' Preceive- ^-^J Psay' "•'^ ' Psay_with' "-^ Pthai v 9.1 ; Pthrough- "-^-^ Pvet -^•-' ' N^less- 9.3; Pmor e than-"••^'' Fryet' 9-3 ; F • 9 ?• A- 9.4; =>:9.1 ; <=:9. 2 By this the list of operands and operators is com­pleted. Similar comments as those in čase of the previous paragraph can be made. 3.10. /1 FORMULA SVSTEM OF THE TENTH PARAGRAPH OF §i / [BTj The formal depiction of the tenth paragraph is as follows: (10.1) TT, Palways°P r project r-aiways"|—pertaiii 9full(^disclose(®in-the-world))'' 7r(U) C (U \=^^ TTfor-Being)); ^(U) Nsketch_oiit_beforeliand (^C^) ^ ((Prange Pessen°Pdiscl ^what) Pessen ° Pdiscl Prange))' (10.2) v^ Pdevote ^ ) Pprim_to ^disclosev^"world)' (S) 1=^ S)) (=p,„^o[r=„,„,j_p„, gB,vorid@); (10.3) ("• Pthrow ^) Pprimjnto 9sakc' -^ Pexist_as ^ ' (10.4) ( ^ Peither (^auth Parise_oiit (^selKOone) Nas ^^self))) Nor (^N^inaiuh) ; (10.5) v''in Po f ''inauth/ Nmean ((S) Ncut_off S ) Nfroni ^selK®)): '•inauth Nmeaii (® Nu°Nonly ®world); (10.6) v-^vvorld Pa s -°in-the-world) ^ -Oones-Self' (10.7) v*^auth' '^inautli Neither Tgeniiine) Nor v^auth' ^inauth P Tgeniiine^' (10.8) ^ Npernieate C^ Nas ^for-Being)' (10.9) (^basic_l W Ndivert ^one) ^ (Nlay_aside ^basic_2(^)); (10.10) ((U Nas ^in-the -world/ Palways°Nc -as lways " r-pertain 9full(^disclose(S)))) ((•^diversionv*^) Pa s '^whole) Nexist M^modiK^proj ect)) '•> (10.11) U(2Bworld) Nalways°Nu ®in(U(2B^orld)); (^(Sex) Nas U(Sex)) Nalways U(^world) The survey of the operands and operators of formula system (10) and their appearance in for­mula subsystems (10.i), i = 1, .. 11 is given by the following list: 10.7,10.7 ; Sex: 10-11'10.11 ; I L;enuine' 9disclose: 10.1 , 10.2, 10.10; 9disclose(®): 10.10; ^disclose('°iii-die-world)- !'-'• 1' ^disclose(^world)- 10.2; v^jjversion 10.10; «diversion(U): 10.10; Li„: 10.5; t-inaiitir 10.5, 10.5; (^modif: 10.10; P-modiKVoiect): 10.10; Oone: 10.4, 10.9; Tt: 10.1 , 10.8 ; " ' "" " 7t(ll): 10.1 , 10.1 ; ^basic_l- 10.9; :rbasic_l(ll): 10-9; ^basic_2: 10.9; Ttbasic 2(U): 10.9; ^for-Being- 10-1 , 10.8 Voject : 10.1,10.10 ; 10.1. 10.1 ; '^self-10.4, 10.4, 10.5; -'raiigc' aseitO) : 10.5; ^selt) Ninto ^C^)) In this formula only the following operands and operators occur: T:: 11.1; TtCU): 11.1 ; ^for-Being: H-l ; ^for-Being(S): H-U ©: 11.1, 11.1; %act:ll-l ; U: 11.1; Nas: 11.1; Ndivert^ H-l ^ Ninto:!!-! This completes the operand and operator list of formula system (U) . One recognizes hovv this system is without a particular significance if it is asserted outside of the understanding system as a whole. 3.12. A FORMULA SVSTEM OF THE TWELFTH PARAGRAPH OF %31 fBTJ The twelfth paragraph is informationally charac­terized by the following formula system: (12.1) Tchar(Voject(U)) Nin (^ Ninake_up°Nexist f^sight(®)); (12.2)CTsightC^) Nwith wdisclose('^there) Nexist)' ((S) \= asight(2))) Nequi_p°Nalways 58(®)) Nas vTcircunispvTconcem.)' Tconsider(^solicitude)» ^sight((» Nas 93) Nsake O N i N ©)» ; (12.3) (SexNre l .prim_whole ^sig ht(S)) N ^transpar' (12.4) T^traiispar N (^know(cfself) N '^sense(^well)); ("^traiispar rr ^perceptv^^self) F^but C^seizeC^funC-^discloseC^in-the-^M/orld))) Nthroughout°Nall ('-itenivTconst/ F^essen ("^transpar' (12.5) U))); (« Nsight ®exist(o^)) Nso_far (a p ('^traiisparC'^) Nwitli°Nequal ^prini(''item N ^cKistC'^)))' ®exist(<^) N ®alongside(®world' ®witli(w)) I In this system the following operands and operator ar involved: a: 12.5, 12.5; Tchar: 12-1; Tchar(^prqject(ll^))* 12-1 ; Tcircumsp- 12.2; TcircunispUconcem)- i•^•2, Tconcera: 12.2 ; Tconsider^ 12.2; Tconsider(''^solicitude) • 12.2; Tconst- 12.4; 'ex" 12.3; ^disclose* A'^.'^> i'^.4, ^disclosev™in-the-world) • 12.4; "disclosev'^there)* 12.2; ''itenv 12.4, 12.5; ''itemvTconst/• 12-4, ' iteni TT, 12.5; prini-Hnri n|v " j [=®exist(«)):12.5; "^pnmv^-iteni ^project(li): 12.1; 7T. project : 12.1; ^solicitiide- 12.2; Oseif: 12.4, 12.4; 'sense : 12.4; Cfsense(llwell): 12-4; asight: 12.1, 12.2, 12.2, 12.3; asightC®): 12.1, 12.2, 12.2, 12.3; asight((« Nas 58) Nsake (^ N ; N S))): 12.2; •^diere: 12.2; ^transpar 12.3, 12.4, 12.4, 12.5; T^transparC«): 12-5; (PfuU: 12-4; ^fuIlC^^discIoseC^in-the-vvorld)) '• 12-4; w: 12.5; « : 12.2, 12.2; «(S)): 12.2; -^alongside- 12.5; ^alongside(^world' ^with(w))'. 12.5; ®in-the-worId: 12-4; ®with: 12-5; 93witii(a)): 12.5; S : 12.1, 12.2, 12.2, 12.3; ®exist: 12.5; ®exist(a): 12.5. 12.5; ^know' 12.4; ^know(c^self): 12-4; q5percept: 12-4; ^rcept(c^self): 12-4; S • • 12 4­ ^-'seize-'•^•^f Sseize(9fiill(^disclose(^in-the-world))): 12.4; U: 12.1, 12.1, 12.4; Uweli: 12.4; SB^orld: 12.5; \=: 12.2, 12.3, 12.4, 12.5; Nali: 12.4; Nalways: 12.2; Nas: 12.2; Nbut: 12.4; Nin: 12.1; Pequai: 12.5; Nequi_p: '^^•^y Pequi_p°Palways: 12.2; Fessen: l^^.^« Nexist: 12.1 , 12.2; Nmake_up: l-^-lJ Pmake_up°Nexist: 12.1; Frel_prim_whole: 1 -^. J! Nsake: 12.2; Nsight: 12-5; Nso_far: 12.5; Nthroughout: 12.4; Nthroughout °NaH: 12.4 Nwith: 12.2, 12.5; Nwit]i°Nequai: 12.5 N : 12.4; o: 12.1 , 12.2, 12.4, 12.5 Thus, the operand and operator list for the twelfth paragraph is completed. 3.13. X FORMULA SVSTEM OF THE THIRTEENTH PARAGRAPH OF §31 [BTJ The text of the thirteenth paragraph, which in­cludes only one sentence, delivers the follovving formula system: (13.1) Oopaque(®) Nroot°Nprini_sol Sego(®NdeceptS)); *^opaque Nroot°Njust_as_nuich ^lackC^acquaiiit Nwith ®world) The operand and operator list of the last two for­mulas is: Sego:' 13.1 ; Sego(S) hdecept §)): 13.1 ; l-llack: 13.1; P^lack(^acquaint Nwitli ®world): 13.1 ; 21acquaiiit: 13.1 ; S : 13.1 , 13.1 ; Qopaque: 13.1,13.1 ; Dopaque(®): 13.1 ; aCworid: 13.1; Ndecept: 13.1; Njust_as_much: 13.1 ; Nprim_sol* 13.1; Nroot: 13.1; Nroot ° Njust_as_much: 13.1; Nwith: 13.1; Nroot: 13.1; Nroot°Nprim_soi: 13-1; °- 13.1 This completes the list of operands and operators of the thirteenth paragraph. 3.14. A FORMULA SVSTEM OF THE FOURTEENTH PARA GRAPH OF §57 [BTJ The formula system for the fourteenth paragraph is, for instance. (14.1) (Oone N guard_against "mis'^express(^sight/)) —^ (°one Psure) ' (14.2) ^expressv^sight) Pcorresp (Tcleared Nchar ^disclose('^there))> (14.3) nipan °F-—inst V-Pnprrpivp F~with •'see Nnieaii°Pjust (rperceive ^eyes(Pbody)) > S, see Pmean (2Iaware(°^)Npure°N sense (( a [= apresent_at_haiid) ^ ^at-handC'^))); (14.4) ('-'one Ngive ^sign_exist(*^sight)) Ndraw_upon ° Nnierely 9feature(^peculiar(^see)/ > '^ Nencounter°Nconceal \^ Naccess 9feature(^peculiarv^see))/' (14.5) (•^senseNdo 9(14.4) C •^doniain(^disclose('-^sense)) > (14.6) 3begin('t^trad(^philo)) Norient ° vNprim ° Ntowards) (^see Pa s ('^•way(^access) Pt o ^ ' '"/) ' (14.7) "^trad Nconnect (•^one Nformalize (^sight' ®see Nenough°Nobtain ('^temi_uni Nchar ('^access Pt o v<^' -^ Pa s (^access ^ ®generaj)))))) In this formula system the following operands and operators occur: a: 14.3, 14.3, 14.4, 14.4, 14.6, 14.7; '^present_at_hand* 14.3 ; Rbegin- 14.0, Pbegin('^trad(^philo)): 14.6; 3body: 14.3 ; Tcleared: 14-2; ^express: 14.1, 14.2 ; ^express(^sight/: 14.1, 14.2; Leyes: 14.3 ; ^eyes(l-;body/: 14.3 ; ^disclose' 14.2, 14.5 ; v^isclosev'^there): 14.2; "doniain: 14.5 ; ^domain(^discloseV*^sense)): 14.5, O : 14.1, 14,1, 14.4, 14.7; one ^at-hand: 14-3; ^at-handCo'): 14.3; ^peculiar: !'+•'+, 14.4, VculiarCSsee): 14-4, 14.4; Tt •philo: 14.6; crsignesist^ 14.4; '^sign_exist(^sight)- 14.4; crse^sg: 14.5; Gsight: 14.1 , 14.4, 14.7; Tterni_u,ii: 14.7; TI^,^,^: 14.2; Ttrad: 14.6, 14.7; ^tradCVilo): 14-6; : 15.1, 15.4; o: 15.1 Thus, the operand and operator list for this para­graph is completed. 3.16. A FORMULA SYSTEM OF THE SIKTEENTHPARAGRAPH OF §i / fBTJ The collection of formulas for the sixteenth para­graph is as foIlows: (16.1) (^disclose('^there) ^ U) |= (^discloseCt^there) \= ®way(^for-Being(®))); (16.2) (^discloseC™) Pgeneral) ^lie ((-oC^Jjjsclose) Pproject°Pupon (9sake' C?sign(5Sworld))) CI 3Q3way); (16.3) ^(®) Nhave°((Nalready°Nbeen)°Ntake) ((®grant ^ ^roject ) Nupon ^) ' (16.4) ((N u ^ ) C Ttproject) Nthough CF7^onto°Pconceive '") ' (16.5) (l?(S3(a)) [=essen ^project(®in-tiie-world)) ^(«Nhave(li(«)Nconst®(«))) ; (16.6) v^stage(^early) Pposit°Pdognia ^what) pnow°pge t Sexhibit(^const(®))' ( O C (Sconst(58)) Nas ^) N "^thereC^constC®))' (16.7) SinterC^temporalC®)) Pclarify a^existNoftl(58)); (t^exist Nof ^(®)) Msatisfy °Qlarify ^limitC'' investigate) > 9(1.1). 9(1.2)' ••• . 9(18.1) N hnvestigate Operands and operators of this formula collection are: a: 16.5, 16.5; Searly: 16.6; Sexhibit* 16-6; Sexhibit(Sconst(®)): 16-6; ^disclose- l^-l . 16.1, 16.2, 16.2; ^discloseC®)- 16-2; %sclose('^there)- 16-1, 16.1; "-investigate' 16-7, 16.7; X\[j^i: 16.7; ^limitCl-investigate)- 16.7; fjg^ist' 16.7, 16.7; 7r: 16.3; Ttfor-Being^ 16.1; ^for-Being(S>): 16.1 ; Trproject^ 16-4, 16.5; ^project(-^in-the-worId/- lo-5 , CTsign: 16.2; c^siEn(®5world)' 16-2; '^stage-16.6; '^stage(^early)- 16.6; ^there- 16.1 , 16.1 , 16.6; 9sake: ^6.2; 9(1.1). 9(1.2)' ••• '9(18.1)-* 16.7; 53: 16.2, 16.2, 16.3 , 16.4, 16.4, 16.5, 16.5, 16.6, 16.7, 16.7; 58(a): 16.5, 16.5 ; ^(^disclose): 16-2; '°in-tlie-world" 16.5; Sconst^ 16-6, 16.6; Sconst(58): 16.6, 16.6; S): 16.1, 16.6; ®grant- 16-3; Sinter: 16-7; Sinter(2^temporal(®)): 16-7; fi: 16.5 ; R(83(a)): 16.5; rproject' 16.3 ; '^'teniporal' I"-' . ^temporal(^): 16-7 U: 16.1 , 16.3 , 16.5 , 16.6, 16.7, 16.7; U(93): 16.3 , 16.5 , 16.7, 16.7; 5Bway: 16.1 , 16.2 ; 2Bway(^for-Being(®)): 16-1 ; 5B,^ha,: 16.6; ffi^orld: 16.2; t=: 16.1 , 16.6, 16.7; |=already: 16-3; Palready°Pbeen' 16.3 ; (Nalready°Nbeen)°Ntake' 16.3 ; Nas- 16.6; Nbeen: 16.3; Nclarify- 16.7; Nconceive- 16.4; Ndognia- 16.6; Nessen- 16.5 ; Ngeneral- 16.2 ; Nget- 16-6; Nhave- 16-3, 16.5 ; '• Nhave ° ((Nalready ° Nbeen) ° Ntake): 16.3 ; Niiow: 16.6; Nnow°Nget- 16-6; Nof- 16.7;, Nposit^ 16-6; Nposit° Ndognia- 16-6; pproject- 16.2; Nproject°Nupon- 16.2; ptake- 16.3; Ntliough: 16.4; Nu^ 16-4; Nupon- 16.2, 16.3; |^onto: 16.4; Nonto°Nconceive- 16.4; p7=satisfy" 16.7; Nsatisfy°Cclarify: 16.7; C: 16.1, 16.2, 16.3, 16.4, 16.6; '^clarify: 16-7; Cn^: 16.2; =^: 16.5; o: 16.2, 16.3, 16.4, 16.6,16.7 This completes the list of operands and operator of informational system (16). The seventeenth paragraph is characterized by the' following informational formula system: . 3.17. A FORMULA SYSTEM OF THE SEVENTEENTH PARAGRAPH OF §J/ fBTJ (17.1) ((UmultiCSmind)' "^ Nas l^miilti(Sexist)) Pehar ^prini(^disclose(^-°in-the-world)/' (17.2) (2Bway(aJi)N®)Nsee TtO \=; ^ S)); (17.3) (S) C 7tproject(^disclose(^@)))) r^have°Palways •^' (17.4) 7rproject(^for-Being(®)) Ndeliver (9fact('^throw(^)) ^I T^iere); (17.5) ((93(2)) Mniore°Nnow Senignia) Nthat ((Oone Pexplicate ^exist(Tconst(®('^diere)))) ^ '^sense(''^throw(^project)))) [=CLquest(®(®)); (17.6) (aians^er Nto Clq„est(58(S)))) N ''indeed' (17.7) ( '-indeed* 17.6; M^niiilti^ 17.1. 17.1; K'multi(Sexist)-17.1; l-tmulti(®nund)* 17.1; v • 17 7-v. k?(^ques Pa anew -i'. ' > ''anewv'-^quest t—aboiit (® Nof T^throvvC^projectC^in-the-vorld)))) '• 17.7; Oone: 17.5, 17.7, 17.7; TT: 17.2, 17.3; TTO): 17.3; 7r(S)|=;|=S):17.2; ^for-Being: 17.4; ^for-Being(®): 17-4; ^prim* -i' • A j ^primC^disclose(-°in-the-world/) • 1' • 1! Voject^ 17-3, 17.4, 17.5, 17.7; ^projectC^discloseC^J^C®)))-17.3; Voject(^for-Being(®)): 17-4; ^project(-"in-die-world)-1'-'» 17.5;•'sense­ 17.5; *^sense('^throwC^project)) • •^solution" i '. '; ^solution(^): 17.7; T^there: 17.4, 17.5; -Cthrovv: 17.4, 17.7; '^throw('^project(-°in-the-world)) • !'•'"> '^throw(®): 17.4; '^throw(^project)-17-5; 9fact: 17.4; Nas: 17.1; Ncliar^ 17.1; Ncome* *•'• '\ Pdeliver^ 1'.4; Nemerge' 1 '•'» Peven' !'.''> Nexplicate' 1'.5; Nfirst^ 17.7; 17.7; Pfirst ° (plet ° Pemerge) '• Nfomnilate' 1 '• '^ Nhave-1 '.-^' Phave°Palways" 1'.3; Nlet: 17.7; Plet°Pemerge-^l-'\ Pnow: >• I•->•> Nof: 17.7; Nover-!'•' i Psee-1'.2; Nthat^ 17.5; Ko : 17.6; Pmore: 1'--^ C: 17.3, 17.4, 17.5;Pmore ° Piiovv: 1' . J > =»: 17.7; o: 17.3; 17.5 Thus, the operand and operator list for the seven­teenth paragraph is completed. 3.18. /1 FORMULA SYSTEM OF THE EIGHTEENTH PARAGRAPH OF §J7 [BTJ For the last, eighteenth paragraph the foUovving formula system is obtained: (18.1) ((t=but°(Nfirst°Neven) (•^one Njust°Nbring SeverydayC"('0)) Finto "^vievv) '•> (^(«)N(UNwithSmind))) ; (((Oone t=do ^so) Nin 'Pphenomenalv'^adeqiiate(^way))) Nto ^funC^discloseC^^there))) =^ (°one Fnnist ° Pwork_out Tconcrete('^this(^^nnlltiv^exist)))) The operands and operators occurring in this sys­tem are: '^adequate- lo-l ! ^adeqiiatev-"^way)-1 o-11 Tconcrete- lo-l J Tconcretev'^this(t^multi vLexist/)) • 18.1 ; ^everyday- lo'l » Leveryday(^(«)): 18-1 ; ^exist' ^o-l> ^^multi• 18-1 ; ^disclose- lo-l J ^disclose('^there)- 18.1 ; ^^nlulti(Sexist)• 18.1 ; ''-'vievv- 18.1 ; Oone: 18.1 , 18.1 ; CTso:18.1; "^there- 18.1 ; "^this- 18-1; '^this(l-^multi(2^exist)) • 18.1 ; (Pfuii: 18.1 ; : 18.1; o : 18.1 Thus, we arrived to the end of the symbolical survey of the paragraphs taken from the section §31 of the Heidegger's Being-there as Understanding in his epochal work Being and Time. The task which remains is to give a fmal formal picture of the system which models Section 31 as a whole. Further, we are obliged to comment the significance of the transition from a text to an informational formula system and point out possi­bilities of the initial formal system obtained from verbal text and system's informational develop­ment. 4. SECTION 31 (§31 OF [BT]) AS AN INFORMING INFORMATIONAL SYSTEM 4.1. INFORMATIONAL FORMALIZATION OF TEXT What could be the difference between a written text (a sequence of sentences expressed in a natural language) and to this text corresponding formula system expressed in the proposed'informational language? As we usually say, the written text has its meaning which can be differently understood by different observers. An observant text understand­ing (belonging to someone or to something) in­forms its specific text meaning in the so-called intelligent metaphysical informational cycle vvhere informing, counter-informing, and embedding of text information take plače. This meaning is con­stimted in several, serial and parallel, traditionally atoraized (semiotic) ways, for instance, through semantics, syntax, and- pragmatics of the given text. Of these three, pragmatics is that atomized semiotic component which could reach farthest in its specific informational understanding, inform­ing the meaning of text, by its own, individual semantics and syntax, within its own, specifically oriented, intended, and significantly structured in­formational system. What does such position mean in concem to an informational formula system which in its initial state models the originally writ­ten text? A formula is a sequence of operands and operators figuring as informationally active and passive informational entities simultaneously. Through formalization, a word or a word group in a sentence becomes the informing (arising, chang­ing, variable) entity within the corresponding for­mula or formula system. It is no more an informationalIy static (meaningly constant), for ali times written and linguistically determined entity, for vvhich one can compose, decompose, and con­struct meaning solely by means of a dictionary. however, in his or her own mind. Through trans­fonnation of vvords or word groups of a text into informing entities, the introduced operands and operators begin to inform in their own (spontane­ous and circular) way. And that situation only confirms the attimde of a text observer when the text is read, smdied, and/or thought through an observing perspective. Through formalization, vvords and word groups begin to act, perform, interact, observe, and mutually observe each other informationally in the full sense of informing of Information. Through informational concepmal­ization, the previously static text components now inform and are informed, impact and are impacted within an informational formula system. For instance, by the introduction of an in for­mational formula system, a new happening arises which riever take plače in čase of a computer program. An informational formula arises, changes, is variable, while the computer program performs as a text (recipe, fixed procedure). The informational formula is simultaneously a written and an informationally executing program, while the computer program has two different and inde­pendent states (natures): its record as a machine program on the hard disc and its record as an executing procedure within the high-speed mem­ory; both records must not be changed. If the first record is changed, the program is modified by the user; if the second one is changed during the pro­gram execution, this change is irregular, illegal, malfunctioning, and unforeseeable, for instance, virological. After this discussion it is possible to feel the difference which exists between a written text and to the text corresponding formula system, which is an initial situation, before this system with its operand and operator entities begins to inform in its own way, that is, spontaneously and circularly. This informing models the way of happening in the mind of observer when a text is read, studied, and envisioned repeatedly into details, delivering in­formational interaction, relation, and interdepend­ence through arising strucmring and organization. A formula system which initially modeled a text becomes an informing system and entities—origi­nally words and word groups—become informing entities (operands and operators) which change their meaning (semantics, syntax, and pragmatics) and let it arise in an informationally strucmred and organized manner. One sees how reading a text is not only a semiotic affair in the sense of a traditional (scien­tific) semantic, syntactic, and pragmatic atomiza­tion; reading a text has its own spontaneous and circular nature of an open informational system in which new, different, and contradictory seman­tics, syntax, and pragmatics can arise. »Words« begin to impact »other words« and »diemselves«, they become informational relatedness impacting the arising of the instantaneous formula system. However, through informing, this relatedness grows, changes and vanishes, becomes influenced by the »affectedness«, that is, »informingness« of the system in question. Thus, modeling a text by a formula system is not only a traditionally semiotic problem; the development of the formula system hides its own informational potentiality of arising, that is, its own, unforeseeable informational na­ture—of understanding. 4.2. SECTI0N3JASA WHOLE At last, we have to integrale the paragraph infor­mational systems (1) to (18) into the unique section system. In this way we obtain a unique informa­tional program for which operand and operator entities mustbe informationally determined. At the end of this essay a dictionary of operands and operators is listed and in this dictionary operands can be additionally formalized (in fact, in­formationally determined in an entity metaphysi­cal-parallel way) to the necessary extent. The verbal explanations in three different natural lan­guages can be extended from single words or idi­oms to informational strucmres corresponding to the meanings of words found in different dictionar­ies of natural languages (and, maybe, also to someone's attitude or taste). By this procedure, additional metaphysical and parallel formulas for particular operand entities are obtained and can be added to the integral informational system of Sec­tion 31 . Certainly, later on, in the formula develop­ment cycle, further inadequacies can be observed. This state of inappropriateness can call for supple­mentary modification, correction, and extension of the existing formula sy$tem with the goal to reach the adequate state of informational excellence. This is the main strategy of a text understanding and its perfection through an informational for­mula system. Improvements in this sense can al­ways be added, broadening the realm of informing of information which concerns a verbal text. At the end of the paragraph formula" system integration into the section system. the^ foUpvving mustbe stressed repeatedly. In depicting afeXt into a system of informational formulas, words and word groups are transformed into informational operands and operators. Hovvever, operands and operators are not uords and word groups anymore; they perform (inform) as informing entities and not as statically, within a given dictionary determined items. Operands are entities which develop in an informational way. This kind of informing is in­formational arising npt-0nly in the \vay of meaning of entities, but also iiftheir formal stnicture and organization, which is interaction, intervveaving, impacting, observation of the appearing entities of the system. Thus, formalizing a text means giving to the text words and their grammatically organized groups an inforraationally arising character, which spontaneously and circularly, also intentionally, projects the informational system, stnicturing and organizingitdynamically. Through formalization, a text becomes informationally dynamic and keeps the namre of the original text within a certain intentionof informational arising, however, flexi­bly letting the spontaneity and circularity to be and perform in an investigational and developmental manner. 5. AN INFORMATIONAL FORMULA SVSTEM MAGING A WRnTEN TEXT 5.1. THE IMPACT OF OPERANDS APPEARING SEVERAL TIMES IN INFORMATIONAL FORMULAS In a formula or formula system, an informational operand or an subscripted operator marker can appear several times, on different places, in a single or in different formulas, and in different forms. Such operands or markers can be free stand­ing entities or they can be formaIly nested in com­plex formal stnictures, for instance, as operands of the form (V.l) a, rp(a), rp((|j(a)). ... or as subscripted operators, for instance, (.V . 2 ) 1=^ , f=:^^(3), t=r^^,;^(3(y), ... The basic question is, how do the informational connections between. entities, possessing a, per­form \vhen a appears in operand and operator entities. several times in a single formula or in different formulas of a formula system? • In a system of mathematical formulas, the connection between different appearances of a variable a follows the metaphysical scheme a. = a, which in such cases is the cdnsequence of the mathematical axiom of equivalence of the appear­ing variable. Mathematics postulates the identity of a variable a in the form of equality (equality symbol —) between several appearances of one and the same symbol a. that is, a [= a. How does the informational theory understand this question in čase of operand appearances in an informational formula system? Every informational formula is an autono­mous informational entity in which formula's con­stimtive entities, that is, operands and operators, are involved. Informational formulas arise, that is, develop (grow, change, reduce, vanish) in their own way and by the connective (observing, oper­and linked, etc.)impactofother formulas. And this happens also to operands and operators which occur in formulas of a formula system. In­formationally linked entities can be always meta­physically decomposed, enriching a system o f formulas in a new, linking way. Let in a formula system some »equally« marked entities appear, for instance, oc, ((a (= a; a =1 a; (a|=3)t=(T[=«); etc. In this way, formulas are informationally con­nected, intenveaved, mutually dependent, com­municating (informing, cooperating) through equ­ally marked operand entities. 5.2. A FORMULA SVSTEMDEVELOPING ON THE BASIS OF THE WRITTEN TEXT IMA GIN G In this section we have to give short answers to the following questions: What does the formalization of a written text mean and what is the purpose of such formalization? How can the initial formaliza­tion of a text develop afterwards and what can this development offer as an arising informational sys­tem? How do these questions touch the problem of the so-called informational machine which is a tool for informing of information? What does the formalization of a written text mean and what is the purpose of such formaliza­tion? Formalization is nothing else than a transcrip­tion of the literal text from a namral into the informational language. This language constimte operands, operators, and pairs of parentheses. The language presupposes that everything informa­tional can be expressed in a mixed active and passive way, by informing, vvithin which operand and operator entities act, interact, impact each other according to the basic informational princi­ples. In this way, a text formalization is always possible. Even more: the process of formalization possesses its own analysis and synthesis, that is, informational composition and decomposition, and it is possible to transcribe a text sufilciently precisely, supplementary, complementary, and also additionally. The result of a text formalization can be a perfected, also improved, informationally well-determined formula system, which from now up performs as an informational program (IM). An IM by itself is informational and behaves as an informational operand. Thus, the purpose of for­malization is to make a text informing as to the text corresponding formula system, This system develops, arises vvith the intention towards a more perfect or fmal state. How can the initial formalization of text develop afterwards and what can this development offer as an arising informational system? The ini­tial formula system is as precise as possible infor­mational interpretation of the written text. It is not always sufficiently exact »copy« of the original text, so, supplementary formulas, additional inter­ pretation, and extension of the initial system are possible. One can experience substantial differen­ces in trials to formalize, for instance, the English and the German version of one and the same text. The well-known problem of interpretation occurs in every attempt to translate a text into a natural or formal language. In the next development cycle, the initial or any later formula system can be corrected, made more precise or satisfactory for someone's taste or for an informational machine understanding. By this process of »improvement«, the formula system arises intentionally, where in­tentional spontaneity and circularity come to one's j r a system's constructive and de-constructive con­sciousness. How do the previous questions touch the problem of the so-called informational machine, which is a tool for informing of informational entities? Within an IM, operands and operators must keep the pr6perty to inform and to be in­formed, that is, counter- inform and embed the arriving and arisen information in a spontaneous and circular way. Within its architecmre and oper­ating system, the IM must offer possibilities and necessities of spontaneous and circular informing of informational entities and enable the informa­tional interaction among entities. In this context, the spontaneous means an automatic, impulsive, unpremediated, arising action which is simulta­neously unconstrained, unreasoned, namral, etc. in an entity-intentional and phenomenal way, keep­ing the sense of an entity's phenomenalism, ex­ternalism, internalism, and metaphysics. The circular has the meaning of a circulating way of informing not only in an indirect and cyclic way, but al;so in a spread, exchange, mumally impact­ing, rotating manner, etc. An IM is programmed by informational formula systems which are noth­ing other than informational programs, describing the involved informational entities information-ally. 6. CONCLUSION We see how a linguistic, for instance, a traditional grammatical and semantical approach to the anal­ysis (and synthesis) of sentences, paragraphs, and texts is an artificially reduced, atomically broken, grammatically structured, etc , and by this not in the possible entirety informing system. Whatcould be said to this observation is that informational entities of a written text, that is words, idioms, word groups, sentences, paragraphs, etc. inform among each other and are informed in such a way. Informational approach of text interpretation sur­passes the conventional styles of linguistic under­standing, which in its atomic strucmre is not a dynamically strucmred and arising system of un­derstanding. Certainly, the informational ap­proach can consider traditional and scientifically posited stmctures and methods of a text recogni­tion; however, this may be regularly not sufficient for the dynamically understood vvritten text within an informational environment, in the world where information and its understanding arise in every moment. REFERENCES [BIW] Dreyfus, H.L., Being-in-the-World, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma (1991). [SZ] Heidegger, M., Sein und Zeit, Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tubingen (1986). [BT] Heidegger, M., Being and Time, Harper & Row, New York (1962). [BV] Heidegger, M., Bitak i vrijeme (in Croatian), Naprijed, Zagreb (1985). [WIT] Heidegger, M., What Is a Thing, Regnery/Gateway Inc., South Bend, In (1967). [OK] Popper, K., Objective Knowledge, An Evolutionary Approach, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1972). [OWI] Železnikar, A.P., On the Way to Information, Informatica 11 (1987) 1,4-18. [UAI2] Železnikar, A.P., Understanding as Information II, Informatica 14 (1990) 4, 5-30. [FIP] Železnikar, A.P., Formal Informational Principles, Cybemetica 35 (1992)(inpress). Appendix: Index ofOperands and Operators pertaining to Being-there in Heidegger's Being and Time (§31) A DICTIONARV OFINFORMA TIONAL OPERANDS (Operand symbols with English, German, and Slovene explanation) Greek Operands a. something; thing | etwas; Ding, das | nekaj; stvar | (3.1), (3.2), (3.4) (3.8), (5.1), (7.3), (7.4), (7.9), (8.1), (8.9),(8.10),(9.3), (12.5), (14.3), (14.7), (16.5)D a^ct actuality | Wirklichkeit, die | aktualnost | (3.10) D °'^adequate adequateness; adequate | hinreiGhend | zadostnost; zadosten | (18.1) D aadequate adequate way | hinreichend in den Blick I zadosten v pogledu | (18.1) D <^at_hand something-at-hand | Vorhandene, das| nekaj-priročnega | (9.1) D '^merely_poss something merely possible | nur Mogliche, das | edino mogoče | (3.9) D '^poss_ways different possible ways and degrees | verschiedene mogliche Wei^en und Grade, die | različni možni načini in stopnje | (4.6) D °^present-at-hand something present-at-hand | ein Vorhandenes | nekaj priročnega | (3.4), (3.7), (14.3) D °^still_out something stili outstanding | Noch-nicht-vorhandenes, das | še-ne-razpoložljivo | (5.1) D Pbegin beginning, the | Anfang, der| začetek (14.6) D PbeginCi^tradC^philo)) beginning onwards the tradition of philosophy, the | Tradition der Philosophie von Anfang an, die | tradicija filozofije od začetka | (14.6) D 3body t)ody I Leib, der | telo | (14.3) D (3breakdown breakdown I Weise, die; Bruch, der | način; prelom | (17.7) D Tchar character | MaBige, das; '-maBig'; Charakter, Entvvurfcharakter, der | karakter; primemo | (7.9), (8.4), (8.9), (8.10), (9.4), (12.1), (17.7) D T char(Lenignia(®(S)))) ftill enigmatical character of Dasein's Being, the | volle Ratselhaftigkeit des Seins des Daseins, die | polna skrivnostnost biti tubiti | (17.7) D TcharC^^projectv*^)^ understanding's projective character, the I Entwurfcharakter des Verstehens, der I projektivni karakter razumevanja | (12.1) D Tchar(®) character of Dasein | MaBige des Da­seins, das I tubiti primemo | (7.9) D Tchar(^) character of understanding | Entwurfcharakter des Verstehens, der | karakter razumevanja; razumevajoče | (8.4), (8.9), (8.10), (9.4) D Tcircunisp circumspection | Umsicht, die| preudarnost | (12.2), (15.1) D TcircunispUconcem) circumspection of concem | Umsicht des Besorgens, die | preudarnost preskrbe | (12.2), (15.1) 0 Tcleared claredness | Gelichietheit, die | osvetljenost | (14.2) D Tconim common | gemeinsam | skupen | (15.1) D Tconini(^sense) common sense | Verstandigkeit, die | razumnost | (15.1) D TconcepLex explicit coneeptions | expliziten Begriffe, die | eksplicitni pojmi | (15.4) D Tconcept_exC-^/ explicit coneeptions of Being | expliziten Begriffe von Sein, die | eksplicitni pojmi biti | (15.4) D Tconcem concem I Besorgen, das | preskrba | (12.2), (15.1) D Tconcrete concreteness; concretely | konkret | konkreten | (18.1) D T concrete''^this'i^multiv^exist))) these existentialia concretely | konkrete diese Existenzialien, die | ti konkretni eksistenciali | (18.1) D Tcond condition | Bedingung, die | pogoj I (7.7), (7.9) D Tcond(^(«)) conditions of the possibility of entities | Bedingungen der Moglichkeit des Seiendes, die | pogoji možnosti bivajočega | (7.9) D conditions of possibilities of the Being of Nature | Bedingungen der Moglichkeit nach der Frage des Seins der Natur, die | pogoji možnosti biti narave | (7.7) D Tconsider considerateness | Riicksicht, die | ozir I (12.2) D Tconsider(^solicitiide) considerateness of solicitude, the | Riicksicht der Fiirsorge, die | ozir skrbi | (12.2) D Tconst Constitution; constitution| Konstitution, die | konstitucija | (9.4), (17.5) D Tconst(^('^ther&)) Constitution of the Being of the "there" | Konstitution des Seins des Da, die| konstitutcija Tu-biti | (9.4), (12.4), (17.5) D fcont contingency | Kontingenz, die | kontingenca; naključnost | (3.7) D ") contv^present-at-hand) contingency of something present-at-hand | Kontingenz eines Vorhandenen, die | naključnost priročnega | (3.7) D Tcontent contents, the | Bestand, der | vsebina; Štanjel (8.10), (9.1) 0 Tcontent (^'mind) contents of mind; contents one has in mind | gemeinte Bestand, der | mišljena vsebina; vsebina uma | (8.10) 0 Tcontent(«(S))) contents of Dasein's Being, the | Seinsbestand des Daseins, der | stanje biti mbiti | (9.1) 0 Tgenuine genuine | durchsetzt | uveljavljen; resničen | (10.7), (17.7) O Tgenuine(Pbreakdown) genuine breakdown | echte Weise, die I pravi način | (17.7) O Tniodai category, modal | modale Kategorie, die | modalna kategorija | (3.8) O TniodaK^at-hand) category, modal of presence-at-hand | modale Kategorie der Vorhandenheit, die I modalna kategorija priročnosti | (3.8) D Spvict derivative, existential | -'exist existenziale Derivat, das | eksistencialni derivat | (1.6) D Sd i ini essential dimension [ wesenhaften Dimensionen, die | bistvene dimenzije | (8.1) O S(jini(a) essential dimension of that vvhich (of something which) | wesenhaften Dimensionen des/der... | bistvene dimenzije nečesa | (8.1) D Sdim(a Oiiscl U) essential dimension of that vvhich can be disclosed in understanding | die vvesenhaften Dimensionen des im Verstehen ErschlieBbaren | bistvene dimenzije tega, kar se v razumevanju razkrival (8.1) D Learly earlier | fruher | prej | (16.6) D egocentric | egozentrisch | -ego egocentričen | (13.1) O ego(® Ndecept ®) egocentric self-deceptions of Dasein | egozentrischen Selbsttauschungen des Daseins, die | egocentrične samoprevare tubiti | (13.1) D 'cnigma enigmatical | ratselhaft | skrivnosten | (17.5), (17.7) O Senigraa(«(S))) enigmatical Being of Dasein | Ratselhaftigkeit des Seins von Dasein, die I skrivnostnost biti tubiti | (17.7) O essences I Wesen, das | bistvo ^-essence (15.3)D Leveryday everyday | alltaglich | vsakdanji | (18.1) D Severyday(^(®)) everyday kind of Being | alltagliche Seinsart, die | vsakdanji način biti | (18.1) D existence | Existenz, die | eksistenca | -ex (10.11), (12.3) D Sexhibit exhibited | Aufweisung, die | izkazanost | (16.6) D ^exhibit(^const(®)) exhibited in terms of the Constitution of the being | Aufweisung aus der Konstitution des Seins, die | izkazanost konstitucije biti | (16.6) D Sexist existentiale | Existenzial, das | eksistencial | (3.2), (3.11), (4.1), (9.1), (17.1), (17.5), (18.1) D Sexist(T constv®('^there)))) existential constitution of the Being of the "there" | existenziale Verfassung des Seins des Da, die | eksistencialno stanje biti-tu | (17.5) D ^existv'^project/ existentiale of projection | Existenzial des Entwurfs, das |eksistencial projekta | (9.1) D -express expression | Ausdmch, der | izraz | (14.1), 14.2) D =-expressv'^sight) expression 'sight', the | Ausdruck »Sicht«, der | izraz »vid« | (14.1), (14.2) D eyes | Augen, die | oči | (14.3) D -eyes =-eyes Obody ) bodily eyes, the | leibliche Augen, die I telesne oči | (14.3) D Sfund existentiale, fundamental | fundamentales Existenzial | fUndamentalni eksistencial | (1.5) D ^derive_remote derivatives, remote | entfemte Derivate, die | oddaljeni derivati | (15:2) D ^derive_remote remote derivatives of understanding | entfemte Derivate des Verstehens, die oddaljeni derivati razumevanja I (15.2) D ^discl O"" ^disclose disclosedness | Erschlossenheit, die | razprtost I (8.4), (10.1), (10.2), (10.10), (12.2), (12.4), (14.2). (14.5), (16.1), (16.2), (17.1), (17.3), (18.1)n ^discK^^of-BeingvTcharV*^)) Pexist_const/ disclosednes of existentially constitutive state-of-Being of the character of understanding | Erschlossenheit des konstitutiven Seinkonnens hinsichtlich des Entwurfcharakters des Verstehens, die I razprtje eksistencialno konstimtivne moči-biti glede na projektni karakter razumevanja | (8.4) D • 9disclose(^)(2))) disclosure of possibilities of Dasein | Erschlielien von Moglichkeiten des Daseins, das | razprtje možnosti mbiti I (17.3) D • ^disclosev'^there) disclosedness of the "there", the | Erschlossenheit des Da, die | razprtje Tuja I (12.2), (14.2), (16.1), (18.1) D ^disclosev'"/ disclosedness of Being | Erschlossenheit von Sein, die | razprtost biti | (16.2) D • ^disclose(®in-the-world) disclosedness of Being-in-the-world | Erschlossenheit des In-der-Welt-seins, die | razprtost biti-v-svem | (10.1), (12.4), (17.1) 0 ^disclosev-') Dasein's disclosedness | Erschlossenheit des Daseins, die | razprtost tubiti | (10.10) D • '^discloseC-^^Nvorld) disclosedness of the world, the | Erschlossenheit der Welt, die | razprtost sveta | (10.2) D ^diversion diversion | Sichverlegen, das| samoodlaganje | (10.10) D • ^diversion(^) diversion of the understanding | Sichverlegen des Verstehens, das | samoodlaganje razumevanja | (10.10) D ^domain domain | innerhalb (des Bezirkes) | razumevanja | (8.4) D znotraj (območja) | (14.5) D ^domain ("disclosev^^sense)) domain of discovery of sense | innerhalb des Enteckungsbezirkes des Sinns | znotraj odkritega območja smisla | (14.5) D ijn in-| Un-, das | ne- | (10.5) D I- inauth inauthentic | von Selbst abgeschnurt | neavtentičen | (10.5) D "-indeed indeed, the | Tat, die | dejanje | • (17.6) D "•indiff indifference | Gleichgultigkeit, die | indiferenca | (4.1) D "•intuition intuition | Anschauen, das; Anschauung, die | gledanje; zrenje | (15.1), (15.2), (15.3) D '' intuitionC^essence) intuition of essences | »Wesensschau«, die | videz bistva | (15.3) D ''inventory inventory I Vorhandenes, das | razpoložljivo | (9.1) D ''inventory(^) inventory of Dasein | Vorhandene des Daseins, das | razpoložljivo tubiti I (9.1) D Linvestigate itivestigation I Untersuchung, die | raziskava | (16.7) D ''involve involvement | Bewandtnis, die | zapletenost | (7.5) D ijtem item(s) | Moment(e) | del(i) | (12.4), (12.5) D '' itemUconst) constitutive items, the | Verfassungsmomente, die | konsitutivni deli | (12.4) D Xiack lack I Un-; Mangel, der | ne-; pomanjkanje | (13.1) D Xlack(*^acquamt Fwith ®world) lack of acquaintance with the world | Unkenntnis der Welt, die | neznanje sveta | (13.1) D ^leeway leeway I Spielraum, der | igralni prostor; diskurz | (8.4) D XleewayCT charv^)) leeway of the character of understanding | Spielraum des Entwurfcharakters des Verstehens, der I diskurz projektenga karakterja •^liber liberty | Willkur, die | prostost | (4.1) D ''^liberChndiff) liberty of indifference | Gleichgultigkeit der Willkur, die | prostost brezpomembnosti; brezpomembnost prostosti | (4.1) 0 X|in^t limits I Grenzen, die | meje | (16.7) D '^liniitv'' investigate) limits of investigation | Grenzen der Untersuchung, die | meje raziskave | (16.7)D ^logic logical I logisch | logično | (15.4) D '^logic(9phenomenal) phenomenological | phanomenologisch | fenomenološko | (15.4) D ^lower le vel, lower j niedriger | niže | (3.10)0 l^basic mode, basic | Grundmodus, der | osnovni modus | (1.5) O |iexist meaning, existential | existenziale Sinn, der | eksistenčni smisel | (16.7) O (-^niaiiifold manifold | Mannigfaltige, das | raznovrsmo | (7.6) D Pniaiiifold^^at-hand) manifold present-at-hand, the | mannigfaltige Vorhandene, das | raznovrstno priročno | (7.6) O t^niind "1^^^ I Gemeinte, das | mišljeno, umsko | (8.10) O l^niistake mistake I Vergreifen, das | napačno prijetje | (4.3) D l^modif modification | Modifikation, die | modifikacija I (10.10) 0 l^niodifv'^project) modification of projection \ Modifikation des Entwurfes, die | modifikacija zasnove | (10.10) 0 l-iniore 'more' I »mehr« | »več« | (9.1) O f^more@) 'more' of Dasein, the | »Mehr« des Daseins, das | »več« tubiti | (9.1) O (^multi some; multi- | einige | nekateri | (17.1), (18.1) O l^niultiv^exist) existentialia | Existenzialien, die | eksistenciali I (17.1), (18.1) O M-multi(®niind) states-of-mind | Befindlichkeiten, die | počutnosti I (17.1) D t^sign meaning; significance | Bedeutung, die | pomen | (3.1) D necessity | Notwendigkeit, die | nujnost I (3.10) 0 anew | emeut | nanovo | (17.7) D anew '^anew(*-'quest r^about (^ Pof '^throw(^project(®in-the-world)))) anew the question about the Being of thrown projective Being-in-the-world I emeut die Frage nach dem Sein des geworfen-entwerfenden In-der-Welt-sein | nanovo vprašanje po biti vržene-projektirajoče biti-v-svetu | (17.7) D "^•'at_any_time the necessary at any tirne | jemals Notwendige, das | kdaj nujno | (3.8) 0 vview view I Blick, der | pogled | (18.1) O ^sign significance | Bedeutsamkeit, die | pomembnost | (2.5), (2.6), (2.7), (2.8), (8.3) O ^sign_poss significance, possible mogliche Bedeutsamkeit, die | mogoča pomembnost | (7.3) O Oone one | wir | mi | (9.1), (10.4), (10.9), (14.1), (14.4), (14.7), (15.1), (15.4), (17.5), (17.7), (18.1) O Oontology ontology I ontologisch | ontološki | (15.1)O 7t possibility; potentiality | Moglichkeit, die; Konnen, das | možnost; potencialnost | (3.8), (3.9), (3.10), (3.11), (3.12), (3.13), (4.1), (4.3), (4.5), (5.7), (7.3), (7.6), (7.7), (7.9), (8.1), (8.8), (8.9), (8.10), (8.11),(10.1), (10.8), (11.1), (16.3), (17.2), (17.3) 0 7r(a) possibilities of an entity | Moglichkeiten des Seindes, die | možnosti bivajočega | (7.3), (7.9) O 7r(rchar(U)) possibility of the character of understanding | Moglichkeit des Entwurfcharakters des Verstehens, die I možnost karakterja razumevanja | (8.10) D 7t(umiity) possibility of unity | Moglichkeit der Einheit, die | možnost enosti | (7.6) O 7t(93(S))) possibilities of Dasein's Being | Moglichkeiten des Daseins Sein, die | možnosti biti tubiti | (4.3) O 7r(?8(9'^)) possibility of the Being of Namre | Moglichkeit des Seins von Natur, die I možnost biti narave | (7.7) O 7r(Q3free) possibility of Being-free, the | Moglichkeit des Freiseins, die | možnost prosto-biti | (4.5) D 7T(S)) Dasein'spossibility | Moglichkeit des Daseins, die | možnost tubiti | (3.5), (3.6),(5.7), (8.8), (17.3)D 7r(S)^;[zzS)) possibilities of Dasein as it is | Moglichkeiten des Daseins aus denen her es ist, die | možnosti biti, iz katerih bitje | (17.2) O 7r(U) possibilities of understanding I Moglichkeit des Verstehens, die | možnost razumevanja | (8.11), (10.1), (ll.l) D ^(® Nfirst_find M) possibility of first finding Dasein again, the | sich in Daseins Moglichkeiten erst wieder zu finden | se v možnostih tubiti šele ponovno najti | (5.7) O ^at-hand presence-at-hand | Vorhandenheit, die | priročnost | (3.8), (5.1), (7.6), (14.3), (15.1) O TTat-haiidC'^) presence-at-hand of something | Vorhandenheit von etwas, die | priročnost nečesa | (14.3) D ^basic.I OJ" ^basic_2 basic possibilities | Grundmoglichkeiten, die | temeljne možnosti | (10.9) D ^basic_l(U) Or T^b2&ic_20^) basic possibilities of understanding | Grundmoglichkeiten des Verstehens, die I temeljne možnosti razumevanja | (10.9) D Ttjef possibility, definite | bestimmte Moglichkeit | določena možnost | (4.2) O Ttfor potentiality-for-| (Sein-)k6nnen-, das I možnost-za- i (7.2) D 7^for(®in-the-world) potentiality-for-Being-in-the-world | Sein-konnen-in- der-Welt, das | bit-možnosti-v-svetu | (7.2) D ^for-Being potentiality-for-Being | Seinkonnen, das | moči-biti | (3.3), (3.6),(3.13), (4.1),(4.3), (4.5), (5,1), (5.3), (5.7), (6.1), (8.4), (9.2), (9.3), (10.1), (10.8), (11.1), (16.1), (17.4) D ^for-Being(2)) Dasein's potentiality-for-Being | Seinkonnen des Daseins, das | potencialnost biti tubiti; moči-biti tubitir(4.5), (5.7), (6.1), (9.2), (9.3), (11.1), (16.1), (17.4) D Ttjnterconn possible interconnection | Moglichkeit des Zusammenhangs, die I možnost povezave | (7.5) D ^interconnv^to-hand) possible interconnection of the ready-to-hand | Moglichkeit des Zusammenhangs von Zuhandenem, die I možnost povezave priročnega | (7.5) D TCjog possibility, logical | logische Moglichkeit, die | logična možnost | (3.7) D ^peculiar peculiar | eigen | svojski | (14.4) D ^peculiarv^see) peculiar ofseeing, the | Eigenedes Sehens, das | svojsko videnja | (14.4) D ^philo philosophy | Philosophie, die | filozofija I (14.6) D TCpian plan | Plan, der | načrt | (8.6) D ^prim primordiality; primordial | gleichurspriinglich | prvobiten | (12.5), (17.1) D ''^prim(^disclose(^m-the-world)) primordial disclosedness of Being-in-the-world | urspriingliche Erschlossenheit des In-der-Welt-seins, die | izvirna razprtost biti-v-svetu | (17.1) D ^primC^-itera) F ®exist(°')) primordiality in those items vvhich are constitutive for existence of entities | gleichurspriinglich der konstitutiven Momente der Existenz des Seiendes I prvobitno konstitutivnega v eksistenci bivajočega | (12.5) D priority | Vorrang, der | prednost | 7T. prior (15.1) D ^prior(^at-liand ^ '^tradv°ontology// priority of the present- at-hand in traditional ontology, the | traditionelle ontologische Vorrang des Vorhandenen, der | tradicionalna ontološka prednost priročnega | (15.1)n v'^Durev'' intuition)/ 7t, pnorV^purev priority of pure intuition | Vorrang des puren Anschauen, der | prednost čistega pogleda | (15.1) D Tiproject projection | Entwurf, der | osnutek; projekcija | (8.2), (8.4), (8.9), (8.10), (9.1), (9.4), (10.1), (10.10), (12.1), (16.4), (16.5), (17.3), (17.4), (17.5), (17.7) D •^project(^disclose(^(^))) projective disclosure of possibilities of Dasein, the | entwerfende ErschlieBen der Moglichkeiten von Dasein, das | projektirajoče razprtje možnosti tubiti I (17.3) D ^project(^for-Being(®)) projection of Dasein' s potentiality-for-Being ( Entwurf des Daseins Seinkonnens, der | projekt moči-biti tubiti | (17.4) D ^projectv-^in-the-world/ projection of Being-in-the-world | Entwurf des In-der-Welt-seins, der | projekt biti-v-svem | (16.5), (17.7) D TrprojectCU) projectionofunderstanding | Entvvurf des Verstehens, der | zasnova razumevanja | (12.1) D TCnnr^ pure | pur I čist | (15.1) D •^pure Tt, intuition/ i pure' pure intuition | pure Anschauen, das | čisti pogled I (15.1) D %purev v"-intuition Fo f ^priorv^pureC''intuition))) pure intuition of its priority | pure Anschauen seines Vorranges, das | čisti pogled njegove prednosti | (15.1) D ^solicitude ways of solicitude; solicitude | Weisen des Besorgens, die | načini (možnosti) skrbi | (3.6), (12.2) D ^solicitudeC®) ways of solicitude of Dasein | Daseins Weisen des Besorgens, die j načini skrbi tubiti | (3.6) D ^throvvn possibility, thrown | geworfene Moglichkeit, die | vržena možnost | (4.4) D Prange range I Umkreis, der | območje | (10.1) D ''exist structure, existential | existenziale Struktur, die | eksistencialna strukmra | (1.1), (5.1), (8.2) 0 «7self Self, the I Selbst, das | Se | (10.4), (10.5), (12.4) D ^selKoone) one's own Self | sein Selbst, das | svoj Se I (10.4) D •^selK®) Dasein's Self | Selbst des Daseins, das| Se tubiti | (10.5) D ^sense sense I Sinn, der | smisel | (4.1), (12.4), (14.5), (15.1), (17.5) n ^senseC^liberv'- indiff)) sense of the liberty of indifference, the I Simi der Gleichgultigkeit der "VVillkiir, der | smisel prostosti in diference | (4.1) D ^sense('^throw(^project)) sense of thrown projection, the | im Sinne des geworfenen Entwurfs | v smislu vrženega projekta | (17.5) D *^sense(^well) sense which is well understood | »Selbsterkenntnis«, die | samospoznanje | (12.4) D <^sight "sight"; sight | Sicht, die | vid | (12.1),(12.2),(12.3), (14.1), (14.4), (14.7), (15.1) D asight(S)) Dasein's "sight" | Sicht des Daseins, die I vid mbiti | (12.2), (12.2), (12.3) D . «7sight((53 Nas ®) Nsake i^ N ; N ®)) sight which is directed upon Being as such, for the sake of which any Dasein is as it is | die Sicht auf das Sein als solches, umwillen dessen das Dasein je ist, wie es ist | vid biti kot take, zaradi katerega je tubit to, kar je I (12.2) D •'sign significance | Bedeutsamkeit, die pomembnost | (16.2) D 'si en (2Bworld) significance of the world j Bedutsamkeit der Welt, die | pomembnost sveta | (16.2) D ^sign_exist existential signification | existenziale Bedeutung, die | eksistemcialni pomen | (14.4) D '^sign_exist('^sight) existential signification to "sight" | existenziale Bedeutung der Sicht, die | eksistencialni pomen videnja | (14.4) D a,n so I So, das | Tako | (18.1) D -•so ^solutio n 'solution' I »Losung«, die | »rešitev« | (17.7) D ^solution(® ) Being's solution | Seins Losung, die | bima rešitev | (17.7) 0 Ojtage stage | Smfe, die | stopnja | (16.6) D '^stage(^early) earlier stage | friiher | prej | (16.6) D ^stmcnire Structure | Struktur, die | strukmra | (15.4) D •^stnictureC®) strucmre of Being | Seinsstrukmr, die I struktura biti | (15.4) D '^terni_iuii universal term | universale Terminus, der I univerzalni termin | (14.7) D Tthere t^ere, the | Da, das | m | (2.2), (2.3), (2.4), (5.4), (5.5), (9.4), (12.2), (14.2), (16.1), (16.6), (17.4), (17.5), (18.1)D Tthere(S)) there of Dasein, the | Da des Daseins, das I tu tubiti | (2.2), (2.4), (5.5) D Tthis these I diese | te | (18.1) D '^this(M^multi(Sexist)) these existentialia | diese Existenzialien | ti eksistenciali | (18.1) D throwness; thrown | Gevvorfenheit, die; geworfen | vrženost; vržen | (5.6), (8.5), (17.4), (17.7) D '^throw(^project) thrown projection | gevvorfene Entwurf, der | vrženi projekt | (17.5)D ''^throw(^project('"in-the-world/) thrown projective Being-in-the-world | geworfen-entwerfende In-der-Welt-sein, das | vržena projektirajoča bit-v-svetu | (17.7) D "^throvvC®) Dasein's throwness | Geworfenheit des Daseins, die | vrženost tubiti | (17.4) D "^total totality | Ganzheit, die | celost I (7.5) D '^tota](''involve) totality of involvements, the | Bewandtnisganzheit, die | celotna vpletenost | (7.5) D ''^trad tradition; traditional | Tradition, die; traditionell | tradicija; tradicionalen | (14.6). (14.7), (15.1) D '^trad('^ontology) traditional ontology | traditionell ontologisch | tradicionalno ontološki I (15.1) D "^tradC^^^philo) tradition of philosophy | Tradition der Philosophie, die| filozofska tradicija | (14.6) D "T^transpar "transparency" | Durchsichtigkeit, die I transparentnost; prozornost | (12.3), (12.4), (12.5) D '^transparv'-''--' transparent to entities | durchsichtig gewordene Seiende, das | transparentno nastalo bivajoče | (12.5)n Uujijty unity | Einheit, die | enost I (7.6) D ^lnity(^^nlanifoldv^at- hand)) unity of the manifold present-at-hand, the | Einheit des mannigfaltigen Vorhandenen, die | enotnost raznolično priročnega | (7.6) D Uuiuty(9'l) unity of Nature, the | Einheit der Natur, die | enotnost narave | (7.6) D Uway the most primordial and ultimate positive way | ursprunglichste und letzte positive ontologische Bestimmtheit, die | najizvomejša in poslednja pozitivna ontološka določenost | (3.11) D 9basis phenomenal basis | phanomenale Boden, der | fenomenahio ozadje | (3.13) D (Pfact factical; facticity | faktisch; Faktizitat, die | faktičen; fakticitetal (8.4), (9.2), (17.4) D 9fact(^for-Being) factical potentiaIity-for-Being, the | faktische Seinkonnen, das | faktična možnost biti | (8.4) D 9fact(''^tlirow(S')) fact of Dasein's throvvness | Faktum der Geworfenheit des Daseins, das | fakt vrženosti mbiti i (17.4) D 9fact(®) facticity of Dasein | Faktizitat des Daseins, die | fakticiteta tubiti | (9.2) D ^feature feamre | Eigenschaft, die | značilnost | (14.4) D 9feature(^peculiar(^see/^ peculiar feature of seeing, the | Eigentiimlichkeit des Sehens, die | posebnost videnja | (14.4) D (Pf„li fuU; fullness | voli | poln | (10.1), (10.10), (12.4), (17.7), (18.1) D 9full(Tchar(Seni§ma(®(®)))) ftill enigmatical character of Dasein's Being | volle Ratselhaftigkeit des Seins des Daseins, die | polna skrivnostnost biti mbiti | (17.7) D 9full(^disclose('^there)) full disclosedness of the "there", the | volle Ersčhlossenheit des Da, die | polna razprtost Tuja | (18.1) D 9fiill(^disclose(®in-the-\vorld)) full disclosedness of Being-in-the-world, the | volle Ersčhlossenheit des In-der-Welt-seins, die | polna razprtost biti-v-svem | (10.1), (12.4) D 9full(^disclose(®)) Dasein's full disclosedness | volle Ersčhlossenheit des Daseins, die | polna razprtost mbiti | (10.10) D ^phenomenal phenomenological; phenomenal | phanomenologisch; phanomenal | fenomenološki; fenomenski | (15.3), (15.4), (18.1) D 9phenomenal('^adequate(™world/^ phenomenally adequate way | phanomenal hinreichend in den Blick fenomensko zadosten v pogledu | (18.1) D 9phenomenalC'• intuition(Sessence)) phenomenological intuition of essences | phanomenologische »Wesensschau« | fenomenološki pogled na bistvo | (15.3) D 9sake "for-the-sake-of-which" | Worum-willen, das | zaradi-česa | (2.4), (2.5), (2.6), (2.8), (8.3), (10.2), (16.2) D