Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the treatment of unicentric Castlemans disease: a case report and review of the use of radiotherapy in the literature Chance Matthiesen, Rajeev Ramgopol, Jonathan Seavey, Salahuddin Ahmad, Terence Herman Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA Radiol Oncol 2012; 46(3): 265-270. Received 25 September 2011 Accepted 17 October 2011 Correspondence to: Chance Matthiesen M.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, Peggy and Charles Stephenson Oklahoma Cancer Center, 800 N.E. 10th Street, OKCC L100, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA. Phone: +1 405-271-3016; Fax: +1 405-271-8297; E-mail: chance-matthiesen@ouhsc.edu Disclosure: No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed. Background. Surgical resection is considered standard therapy for cases of resectable unicentric Castleman's disease (UCD). Unresectable cases of UCD do not have a consensus regarding the optimal treatment approach, but have utilized steroids, observation, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Here we discuss a patient presentation of UCD treated with an advanced radiotherapy technique, IMRT. Case report. A 47 year old female was found to have an intra-thoracic posterior UCD and was determined not to be a good surgical candidate. She was referred for radiotherapy and was treated using IMRT to a total dose of 4320 cGy in 180 cGy fractions including a scheduled 10 day break. Following the break, the patient's treatment was replanned at which the initial treatment volume was reduced by 50.9% for the duration of the treatment course. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade III pneumonitis developed which was managed medically. Neither disease progression nor late effects have occurred. Conclusions. The use of IMRT and planned treatment break was successful in the treatment of a case of UCD, and should be considered for other unresectable cases. Key words: Castleman's disease; IMRT Introduction Castleman's Disease (CD) was first described in 1954 and further characterized in 1956 by Benjamin Castleman when he reported on 13 cases of localized mediastinal lymphoid hyperplasia.1 CD, also known as angiofollicular lymph node hyperplasia or giant lymph node hyperplasia, is a rare disorder of unknown etiology. As originally described, CD was a localized disease limited to a single lymph node, which is now referred to as Unicentric Castleman's Disease (UCD). In 1978, Gaba et al. recognized the multicentric Castleman's disease manifestation (MCD).2 Little is understood regarding the pathogenesis of CD. An association was noted between human herpes virus 8 (HHV-8), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and MCD. This association has fueled theories as to the pathology of MCD, but has contributed little to the understanding of UCD or HHV-8 negative MCD.3-5 Clinically, UCD tends to be asymptomatic and is frequently diagnosed incidentally. MCD frequently presents with systemic manifestations at presentation such as fever, weight loss, diaphoresis, and fatigue. The disease progression of CD has been described as ranging from indolent to fulminant.6 Additionally, CD has been associated with increased risk of lymphoma, amyloidosis, FIGURE 1. CT of patient at initial presentation with a mass noted in the posterior right mediastinum. FIGURE 2. Illustration of the contoured mass and five field (1.1.1-1.1.5) coplanar beam arrangements for the IMRT treatment plan. renal insufficiency, and POEMS (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy, skin changes) syndrome which has sometimes guided treatment decisions.67 Standard treatment guidelines are lacking, and there is a paucity of evidence owing to the rarity and heterogeneity of the disease. Literature has been limited to mostly case reviews and a few small case-series. Surgery is considered standard therapy for resectable UCD with several case reports and retrospective series reporting excellent local control and cure rates.8-10 An alternative successful treatment approach for UCD has included the use of radiotherapy.11-14 Other treatment approaches have included steroids, observation, chemotherapy, and combinations of the above mentioned modalities.1315 Unresectable cases of UCD do not have a consensus regarding the optimal treatment approach.14 The treatment for MCD is even less understood and is beyond the scope of this paper. This paper reviews and illustrates a case of UCD that was incidentally found and treated with primary radiotherapy, specifically intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Furthermore, we aim to review and summarize prior reports regarding the use of radiotherapy. Case report Patient presentation The patient is a 47 year old Native American female without significant past medical history or known CD risk factors who presented after being critically injured in a motor vehicle accident. During her trauma evaluation and stabilization, a posterior mediastinal mass was noted as shown in Figure 1. She was taken to the operating room for multiple internal injuries necessitating surgical repair. Visualization of the mass was noted but was not attended to at that time. After a several month recovery, she returned to the thoracic surgeon for follow-up and further workup of the mass. Biopsy was performed via mediastinoscopy and pathology results revealed angiofollicular lymph node hyperplasia, consistent with CD. CT and PET-CT scans were performed which showed the mass to be 5.5 cm x 4.6 cm with a peak SUV of 5.3. Due to the location of the mass and history of recent prior surgery, she was determined not to be a good candidate for complete surgical resection. She was then referred to consider radiotherapy treatment options. Treatment Treatment simulation was performed in the supine position and immobilization via a vac-lock. Treatment planning was performed on Eclipse External Beam Planning 7.5.51 (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto CA). Given the midline, posterior location of the mass, IMRT was utilized to reduce the dose gradient and toxicity to the surrounding normal tissues. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was contoured and expanded 5 mm to create the planning target volume (PTV). The patient was treated to a total dose of 4320 cGy. RT was delivered in nine initial once daily fractions of 180 cGy to a total dose of 1620. She was then placed on a 10 day break followed by re-simulation and treatment planning. She then completed the total 4320 cGy dose prescription without interruption in 180 cGy once daily fractions. Radiation therapy (RT) beam arrangements are shown in Figure 2. The initial PTV volume was 235.7 cm3 and the re-CT PTV following treatment break was reduced to 120 cm3, a reduction of approximately 50.9%. Cumulative dose volume constraints allowed the mean total lung dose to be limited to 961 cGy and the 20% volume to be limited to 1706 cGy. The heart was limited to a mean dose of 939 cGy, and the expanded cord mean to 1163 cGy. Dose volume histograms of each plan (pre and post treatment break) and a cumulative plan sum are shown in Figures 3, 4, and 5. A summary of mean and max dose statistics is shown in Table 1. No acute side effects were noted during treatment. Follow-up At a follow-up of ten months, the patient has had no disease progression. She did develop RTOG grade III pneumonitis at three months follow-up which was managed by steroids. Follow-up PET-CT (Figure 6) showed the mass to be stable at 3.9 cmx 5.1 cm and SUV values to be at background. No late effects have occurred. Discussion 100 eo 60 40 20 \ 1 •V . \ J \ s V- ^ s X 1 —-- II 1000 20(10 Dos ose [cGy] 3000 4Q00 FIGURE 3. DVH of initial IMRT treatment plan. Line colors as follows: Orange - Spinal Cord, Pink - Heart, Yellow - Total Lung, Green - Right Lung, Blue - Left Lung. FIGURE 4. DVH of post treatment break IMRT treatment plan. Line colors as follows: Orange - Spinal Cord, Pink - Heart, Yellow - Total Lung, Green - Right Lung, Blue - Left Lung. Consensus suggests that the optimal treatment approach for patients presenting with UCD has been surgical resection, as cure rates following this approach are near 100%.8-10 The most well-known evidence for this is from a retrospective report of sixty-one patients with UCD treated with surgery and followed for twenty years.16 This report illustrated that complete resection offered the best chance of cure. Other reports have shown that partial resections can ameliorate constitutional manifestations in symptomatic patients; however, documented recurrences did occur more than nine years post resection so continued follow-up is necessary.1213 The approach and treatment of unresectable UCD is not standardized, as methods including combinations of observation, steroids, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy in multiple set- Relative dose [%] 0 30.364 6L.72S 92-592 FIGURE 5. DVH of Cumulative IMRT treatment plans. Line colors as follows: Orange - Spinal Cord, Pink - Heart, Yellow - Total Lung, Green - Right Lung, Blue - Left Lung. Table 1. Organs at risk and the mean and max dose values for each individual treatment plan and cumulative plan. Organ Initial Plan Dose (cGy) Replan Dose (cGy) Cumulative Dose (cGy) Spinal Cord Right Lung Left Lung Total Lung Heart Mean (672), Max(1656) Mean (638), Max(1717) Mean (196), Max(761) Mean (394), Max(1663) Mean (355), Max(1622) Mean (633), Max(2493) Mean (780), Max(2908) Mean (246), Max(895) Mean (504), Max(2813) Mean (501), Max(2686) Mean (1163), Max(4057) Mean (1496), Max(4609) Mean (447), Max(1617) Mean (961), Max(4476) Mean (939), Max(4335) FIGURE 6. CT at four months post-RT. The mass is noted to be smaller. tings have been utilized.14 Additional reports have commented on the use of radiotherapy.11-14,17,18 To the best of our knowledge, no previous reports have commented on the use of IMRT, which is now used routinely for diseases involving the thorax such as lymphoma and cancers of the lung and esophagus as well as for other localisations.19-24 In our report we illustrated the successful use of IMRT for a case of unresectable UCD. Previous reports have utilized cumulative doses ranging from 12 to 50 Gy1112, with lower doses resulting in disease remission in some cases,25-28 but failure in oth-ers.21629 A prior review of the literature14, showed no correlation between dose and response when using primary radiotherapy. Neuhof and Debus reported on five patients treated with radiotherapy with doses ranging from 40-46 Gy.11 Four patients were alive at analysis and all four achieved disease stabilization, or a partial / complete response to radiotherapy. Treatment was well tolerated with the exception of one patient who developed acute grade III skin reactions, followed by stenosis of the trachea, esophagus, and bronchus. Treatment technique in this patient was 3D conformal planning. Chronowski et al. reported on 21 CD patients.12 Twelve had UCD of which four were treated with radiotherapy. All four responded favorably to treatment, with three complete responses to radiotherapy and one partial response. At analysis, two were disease free and the other two had died of unrelated causes. Radiotherapy doses ranged from 39.6 to 40 Gy at 1.8 and 2 Gy fractionation. No comments of toxicity were reported. De Vries et al. reported the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for a case of unresectable UCD.14 In their technique, they used a conventional approach for a lesion in the abdomen treated in 2 Gy fractions to 40 Gy. A 10 Gy intraoperative boost was applied at the time of surgery. No radiotherapy complications were reported. They concluded a neoadjuvant approach could be applied to other cases of UCD. In our report, we describe the use of IMRT for UCD. To our knowledge, no previous reporting of this technique for CD is in the literature. IMRT has been well studied and known to be effective for diseases involving the chest to allow radiotherapy dose escalation with minimization of normal tissue toxicity.20213031 Additionally, we introduce the application of a treatment break during radiotherapy to allow for tumor size reduction. Given the lymphoid nature of CD, and the known apoptotic response of lymphoid tissues to radiotherapy32, a reduction of tumor size in CD could reasonably be expected. In our case, we treated the tumor mass to 1620 cGy, then allowed a for10 day break followed by re-simulation and treatment planning. As a result, the initial PTV was reduced by approximately 50.9%. This PTV volume reduction resulted in further dose minimization to the normal lungs, esophagus, and spinal cord following IMRT treatment replan. Although a dosimetric comparison of radiotherapy techniques is not the intent of this discussion, it should be understood that the use of IMRT is more optimal versus 3D conformal techniques to achieve these results. Furthermore, it should be noted that IMRT can allow greater dose escalation for such tumors; though no evidence is available supporting such a decision. Other modern photon techniques which could be considered include arc therapy and tomotherapy, as in certain situations these techniques may be able to provide an improved normal tissue toxicity dose reduction or more rapid treatment administration. As proton therapy becomes more available, such patients and lesion locations may be most optimally treated by this method to benefit from the proton beam dose characteristics of the Bragg peak. Since unicentric CD often appears in younger patients11, methods and techniques to limit normal tissue dose should always be taken into consideration. Conclusions The dosimetric advantages of IMRT make it a suitable treatment approach for unresectable UCD. A treatment break during therapy should also be considered depending upon lesion location and patient characteristics to further reduce treatment target volumes and improve the dose gradients to the normal tissue. Clinical practice points The approach and treatment of unresectable UCD is not defined, as methods including combinations of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy in multiple settings have been utilized. Additional reports have commented on the successful use of radiotherapy. No previous reports have commented on the use of IMRT, which is now used routinely for diseases involving the thorax such as lymphoma and of the lung and esophagus. The dosimetric advantages of IMRT make it a suitable treatment approach for unresectable UCD. In our report, we highlighted the successful use of IMRT for an unresectable mediastinal mass in a younger patient with UCD. We also described the application of a planned treatment break followed by resimulation and replan of the treatment course. Such an approach allowed the planning treatment volume to be reduced by 50.9% which subsequently allowed greater normal tissue sparing and dose reduction. At follow-up, the patient has had a par- tial response to radiotherapy and disease stabilization. Therefore, we suggest that the use of IMRT should be considered for unresectable unicentric Castleman's disease and the implementation of a treatment break should be considered. References 1. Castleman B, Iverson L, Menendez VP. Localized mediastinal lymphnode hyperplasia resembling thymoma. Cancer 1956; 9: 822-30. 2. Gaba AR, Stein RS, Sweet DL, Variakojis D. Multicentric giant lymph node hyperplasia. Am J Clin Pathol 1978; 69: 86-90. 3. Soulier J, Grollet L, Oksenhendler E, Miclea JM, Cacoub P, Baruchel A, et al. Molecular analysis of clonality in Castleman's disease. Blood 1995; 86: 1131-8. 4. Soulier J, Grollet L, Oksenhendler E, Cacoub P, Cazals-Hatem D, Babinet P, et al. Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus-like DNA sequences in multicentric Castleman's disease. Blood 1995; 86: 1276-80. 5. Gessain A, Sudaka A, Briere J, Fouchard N, Nicola MA, Rio B, et al. Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpes-like virus (human herpesvirus type 8) DNA sequences in multicentric Castleman's disease: is there any relevant association in non-human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients? Blood 1996; 87: 414-6. 6. Herrada J, Cabanillas F, Rice L, Manning J, Pugh W. The clinical behavior of localized and multicentric Castleman disease. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 657-62. 7. Casper C. The aetiology and management of Castleman disease at 50 years: translating pathophysiology to patient care. Br J Haematol 2005; 129: 3-17. 8. Seco JL, Velasco F, Manuel JS, Serrano SR, Tomas L, Velasco A. Retroperitoneal Castleman's disease. Surgery 1992; 112: 850-5. 9. McCarty MJ, Vukelja SJ, Banks PM, Weiss RB. Angiofollicular lymph node hyperplasia (Castleman's disease). Cancer Treat Rev 1995; 21: 291-310. 10. Shahidi H, Myers JL, Kvale PA. Castleman's disease. Mayo Clin Proc 1995; 70: 969-77. 11. Neuhof D, Debus J. Outcome and late complications of radiotherapy in patients with unicentric Castleman disease. Acta Oncol 2006; 45: 1126-31. 12. Chronowski GM, Ha CS, Wilder RB, Cabanillas F, Manning J, Cox JD. Treatment of unicentric and multicentric Castleman disease and the role of radiotherapy. Cancer 2001; 92: 670-6. 13. Bowne WB, Lewis JJ, Filippa DA, Niesvizky R, Brooks AD, Burt ME, et al. The management of unicentric and multicentric Castleman's disease: a report of 16 cases and a review of the literature. Cancer 1999; 85: 706-17. 14. de Vries IA, van Acht MM, Demeyere TB, Lybeert ML, de Zoete JP, Nieuwenhuijzen GA. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy of primary irresectable unicentric Castleman's disease: a case report and review of the literature. Radiat Oncol 2010; 5: 7. 15. Peterson BA, Frizzera G. Multicentric Castleman's disease. Semin Oncol 1993; 20: 636-47. 16. Keller AR, Hochholzer L, Castleman B. Hyaline-vascular and plasma-cell types of giant lymph node hyperplasia of the mediastinum and other locations. Cancer 1972; 29: 670-83. 17. Ye B, Gao SG, Li W, Yang LH, Zhao SH, Ma K, et al. A retrospective study of unicentric and multicentric Castleman's disease: a report of 52 patients. Med Oncol 2010; 27: 1171-8. 18. Lin CY, Chang YL. Castleman's disease in the head and neck region: Meta-analysis of reported cases in Taiwan and literature review. J Formos Med Assoc 2010; 109: 913-20. 19. Paumier A, Ghalibafian M, Beaudre A, Ferreira I, Pichenot C, Messai T, et al. Involved-node radiotherapy and modern radiation treatment techniques in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 80: 199-205. 20. Welsh J, Gomez D, Palmer MB, Riley BA, Mayankkumar AV, Komaki R, Dong L, et al. Intensity-modulated proton therapy further reduces normal tissue exposure during definitive therapy for locally advanced distal esophageal tumors: A dosimetric study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 81: 1336-42. 21. Lievens Y, Nulens A, Gaber MA, Defraene G, De Wever W, Stroobants S, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a dose-escalation planning study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 80: 306-13. 22. Banu A, Enis O, Kaan G, Gungor G. Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in bilateral retinoblastoma. Radiol Oncol 2010; 44: 194-8. 23. Bailey DW, Lalith K; Podgorsak MB. A fully electronic intensity-modulated radiation therapy quality assurance (IMRT) process implemented in a network comprised of independent treatment planning, record and verify, and delivery systems. Radiol Oncol 2010; 44: 124-30. 24. Sladowska A, Hetnat M, Dymek P, Kabat D, Kisielewicz K, Wawrzak M, et al. Application of IMRT in adjuvant treatment of soft tissue sarcomas of the thigh - preliminary results. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy 2011; 16: 110-4. 25. Weisenburger DD, DeGowin RL, Gibson P, Armitage JO. Remission of giant lymph node hyperplasia with anemia after radiotherapy. Cancer 1979; 44: 457-62. 26. Nordstrom DG, Tewfik HH, Latourette HB. Plasma cell giant lymph node hyperplasia responding to radiation therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1978; 130: 169-71. 27. Marti S, Pahissa A, Guardia J, Moragas A, Bacardi R. Multicentric giant follicular lymph node hyperplasia. Favorable response to radiotherapy. Cancer 1983; 51: 808-10. 28. Veldhuis GJ, van der Leest AH, de Wolf JT, de Vries EG, Vellenga E. A case of localized Castleman's disease with systemic involvement: treatment and pathogenetic aspects. Ann Hematol 1996; 73: 47-50. 29. Beck JT, Hsu SM, Wijdenes J, Bataille R, Klein B, Vesole D, et al. Brief report: alleviation of systemic manifestations of Castleman's disease by monoclonal anti-interleukin-6 antibody. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 602-5. 30. Li X, Wang X, Li Y, Zhang X. A 4D IMRT planning method using deformable image registration to improve normal tissue sparing with contemporary delivery techniques. Radiat Oncol 2011; 6: 83. 31. Chapet O, Fraass BA, Ten Haken RK. Multiple fields may offer better esophagus sparing without increased probability of lung toxicity in optimized IMRT of lung tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 65: 255-65. 32. Suciu D. Cellular death by apoptosis in some radiosensitive and radioresist-ant mammalian tissues. J Theor Biol 1983; 105: 391-401.