DOI: 10.17344/acsi.2016.2324
Acta Chim. Slov. 2016, 63, 535-543
535
Scientific paper
Effect of ZnO on the Thermal Degradation Behavior of Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Nanocomposites
Dajana Japi},1 Marjan Marinsek*'2 and Zorica Crnjak Orel1
1 National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, 1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia 2 University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Vecna pot 113, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia * Corresponding author: E-mail: marjan.marinsek@fkkt.uni-lj.si
Phone: 00 386 1 4798 589 Received: 04-02-2016 In the memory of Janez (Janko) Jamnik our dear friend and co-worker.
Abstract
The influence of ZnO nanoparticles on the thermal degradation behavior of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) was tested using thermoanalytical techniques. The studied materials were investigated using TG, DTA, EGA, XRD, SEM and TEM. The ZnO nanoparticles were synthesized via precipitation by adding LiOH into Zn2+ water/ethylene glycol solutions. The ZnO-PMMA nanocomposites were prepared by adding the appropriate amount of ZnO into MMA and subsequent MMA radical polymerization. According to the experimental results and model-free isoconversional activation energy calculations, the addition of ZnO into PMMA played a double role. The ZnO concentrations up to 0.15% stabilized the composite by shifting the degradation interval toward higher temperatures and increasing the apparent activation energy relative to pure PMMA. At higher concentrations, the catalytic effect of ZnO started to prevail and was reflected in the lower temperature intervals of intense PMMA degradation and lower apparent activation energy. The addition of ZnO generally did not change the nature of the PMMA decomposition process.
Keywords: ZnO-PMMA nanocomposites, thermal properties, activation energy, electron microscopy, thermogravime-tric analysis (TGA)
1. Introduction
The potential of using nanometer-scale inorganic particles in a polymer matrix has recently been extensively investigated in several applications, e.g. civil and electrical engineering, building and transportation. Such composites offer the potential to create new materials with improved thermal, electrical, mechanical, optical and fire-resistant properties, which arise from the synergies between the components.1-5 Among the papers published about this subject, it appears that the majority of the work performed particularly concerns composites of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and oxide ceramic filler.6-8 PMMA is an optically clear amorphous thermoplastic. It is widely used as a substitute for inorganic glass, because it shows higher impact strength and undergoes ductile rather than brittle fracturing. Compared with inorganic glass, PMMA has some advantages, such as transmission of more light, and has lower density than
silica glass (1.19 and 2.20 g cm-3, respectively).9 However, PMMA shows poor thermal stability, which restricts it from high-temperature applications. Significant research has been performed in order to improve the thermal stability of PMMA by mixing it with various inorganic fillers. Among inorganic fillers added to PMMA, silica was the most widely investigated.10-14 The thermal degradation of such composites was a prime areas of investigation. It was shown that the addition of silica into PMMA improves thermal stability of the composites. This improved thermal stability was explained by the hindered mobility of the polymer chains due to the presence of filler,15 the ability of silica nanoparticles to trap radicals during PMMA degradation and to act as a gas barrier preventing the degradation products from diffusing out of the composite,14 or through a hydrogen-bonding interaction between carbonyl groups in PMMA and hydroxyl groups of the silica surface,16 where hydrogen bonds interrupt the depolymerization of the polymer
Japic et al.: Effect of ZnO on the Thermal Degradation Behavior
536
Acta Chim. Slov. 2016, 63, 535-543
chains. Similarly to silica, the addition of Fe2O3 and TiO2 nanoparticles into PMMA also influence the composite thermal stability. The improved thermal stability observed in Fe2O3/TiO2-PMMA composites was the result of two main factors: i) the presence of the nanoparticles restricted the mobility of polymer chains, and ii) adsorption of the PMMA on the oxide surface via metoxycar-bonyl groups.17,18 Subsequently, it was shown that relatively high additions of TiO2 nanoparticles into PMMA also play a catalytic role on the polymer thermal degra-dation.19,20 This catalytic effect was explained through the interaction of the methoxy group of the methacryla-te with the hydroxyl groups present at the surface of the oxide particles.
In recent years, the addition ZnO into PMMA has also been intensively studied in order to make functional nanocomposites.21-27 ZnO is an environmentally friendly, important and attractive semiconducting material. It has drawn enormous research attention due to its distinguished properties in optics, photonics and electronics.28 The combination of these two materials has many potential applications, including antireflection coatings, transparent barrier/protective layers, and as flame-retardant materials. ZnO is also a semiconductor with an optical band gap in the UV region that also makes it useful as an efficient absorber of UV radiation.29 Moreover, ZnO can be simply obtained through wet chemistry, which offers it a potential viable route to achieve uniform dispersion in polymer matrices through solution mixing. In studying the thermal stability of ZnO-PMMA composites, it has been shown that ZnO addition has a profound effect on the thermal degradation of the composite.1,30 Liu et al.31 prepared PMMA/ZnO nanocomposites through in situ polymerization of MMA and organic modified nanopar-ticles. The thermal stability and UV absorption of the na-nocomposites were enhanced as ZnO concentration increased. Similar results were also reported by Demir et al.32 who studied the improved thermal stability of PMA/ZnO nanocomposites compared with the blends of PMMA and ZnO. Liufu et al.33 also investigated the thermal degradation of polyacrylate/ZnO blends and proposed that the ZnO particles have a role in both stabilization and destabilization depending on the temperature region. Generally, the role of ZnO on the thermal stability of Zn-O-PMMA can be explained through the same relatively developed mechanisms, such as the barrier effect, trapping radicals, char formation and catalytic effect, as described for SiO2-PMMA or TiO2-PMMA composi-tes.13,17,34-36
Since few research reports focused on thermal behavior of ZnO-PMMA composites, the aim of this work was to demonstrate the catalytic effect of ZnO nanopar-ticles in the path of PMMA thermal degradation. For this purpose, key degradation products were determined and some kinetic aspects were investigated via a model-free method.
2. Material and Methods
2. 1. Used Chemicals
All reagents used for synthesis were of an analytical reagent grade. To avoid hydrolysis upon storage, fresh stock aqueous solutions were prepared from Zn(NO3)2 ■ 6H2O (98% Merck), ethylene glycol (99.5% Sigma-Aldrich) and lithium hydroxide (98% Sigma-Al-drich). For in situ and ex situ coating of ZnO particles, tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) (Sigma-Aldrich), 25% NH3(aq) solution (Merck) and absolute EtOH (Sigma-Aldrich) were used. Methyl methacrylate (MMA) (99% Sigma-Aldrich), bis (4-t-butylcyclohexyl)-peroxydicar-bonate (P-16) and dilauroyl peroxide (LPO) were used for the preparation of ZnO/PMMA nanocomposites.
2. 2. Synthesis of Spherical ZnO Nanoparticles
Prior to ZnO synthesis, the mother solution was prepared by mixing Zn(NO3)2(aq), EG(aq) and LiOH,). In the mother solution, the initial concentrations of Zn and Li+ ions were 0.1 M and the volume ratio of water-to-ethylene glycol was V(H2O): V(EG) = 1:5 The syntheses of ZnO na-noparticles were carried out in a 250 mL flask without stirring at 100 °C, for 2 hours. Firstly, Zn2+ and LiOH solutions in 150 mL of mixed solvents were prepared and heated to 100 °C. After the hydrolysis reaction was completed, the resulting white precipitate of ZnO was centri-fuged, washed with water four times and dried in air at room temperature or re-dispersed in EtOH. In depth report how preparation conditions influence final ZnO morphology can be found elsewhere.37
2. 3. The Preparation of Silica-coated ZnO Nanoparticles by ex-situ Method
Part of the synthesized ZnO nanoparticles was further functionalized by coating them with silica. In a typical ex-situ coating process, the dried ZnO was re-dispersed in 10 mL EtOH and 4 mL MQ water, then NH3(aq) was added to the re-dispersed ZnO solution, and finally the appropriate quantity of TEOS to reach C(TEOS) = 0.048 M was admixed. The coating process was carried out at room temperature for 1 hour in an ultrasonic bath, as suggested in the literature.38 After the procedure was completed, the final product was purified in EtOH and dried in air at room temperature.
2. 4. Synthesis of PMMA
PMMA (sample A) was prepared by chain growth radical polymerization. Prior to polymerization reaction, the initiators P-16 (0.25 wt.%) and LPO (0.25 wt.%) were added to MMA. The polymerization of MMA was carried out in a water bath at 60 °C for 1 hour. The synthesized
Japic et al.: Effect of ZnO on the Thermal Degradation Behavior
Acta Chim. Slov. 2016, 63, 535-537	543

PMMA was poured into glass plates and placed in an oven for 2 hours at 55 °C and subsequently for 10 minutes at 120 °C. Finally, the PMMA sheets were separated from the glass plate moulds.
2. 5. Preparation of ZnO/PMMA Nanocomposites
0.1 wt.% of bare (sample B2) or coated ZnO powders (sample C) were suspended in 5 mL of MMA in a centrifuge tube. The suspensions were sonicated (continuous waves) for 20 minutes prior to the addition of initiators. The polymerization of MMA was conducted as described above. Samples with 0.05%, 0.15% and 0.20% (named sample B1, B3 and B4, respectively) were prepared in the same manner.
2. 6. Products Characterization
The obtained bare or coated ZnO powders were characterized according to their morphological characteristics with a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, Zeiss UltraPlus) with the ability to work in STEM mode. TEM observations were carried out in a transmission electron microscope operated at 200 kV (JEM-2100, JEOL) which was equipped with EDX. TEM samples were prepared by dispersing the powders in etha-nol, using ultrasonification followed by the deposition of the obtained suspension on carbon-coated copper grids. X-ray powder diffraction analyses (XRD, Siemens D-500 X-ray diffractometer) were carried out with Cu-Ka radiation (X = 1.54 A) in the range 20 between 20° and 70° using an XPert Pro X-ray diffractometer. Thermo-gravime-tric decompositions of PMMA or ZnO-PMMA composites were performed using ~50 mg of the sample and a NETZSCH STA 449 F3 set-up with a microbalance having a sensitivity of ±0.1 g coupled with QMS 403 C system. The experiments were carried out in a constant flow of synthetic air (50 mL/min; Ar-O2 - 20 vol.% O2) under non-isothermal conditions (30-600 °C) with heating rates f from 2 K/min to 10 K/min. Partial kinetic analyses of the ZnO/PMMA thermal decomposition were calculated using the non-linear isoconversional method developed by Vyazovkin.39 The isoconversional analysis is based on a model kinetic equation (1):
where a is conversion degree of the degradation reaction, Ea is the apparent activation energy (J mol-1), ka is the pre-exponential factor (s-1) and f(a) is the reaction model [16]. From the above kinetic model, the linear dependence of Inf vs. 1/r may be recognized. Using the Doyle approximation, the slope in the Inf vs. 1/r diagram represents a value of 1.052 Ea/R. The UV-VIS spectra of ZnO/PMMA
nanocomposites were measured on solid plates prepared from pure PMMA, non-coated ZnO and silica-coated Zn-O particles into PMMA using the Perkin Elmer Lambda 950 UV-VIS spectrometer in the spectral range between 250 and 800 nm.
3. Results and Discussion
Powder XRD analysis of the prepared nanoparticles (Figure 1) revealed that all major peaks correspond to Zn-O zincite (JCPDS 01-079-2205, zinc oxide). ZnO is the only crystalline phase present in the sample. The average crystallite size calculated from the (100) diffraction plane is 14.3 nm.
- ZnO
o Ö !I S r- O
j^Jlbs_
-r-—!--■--T--1-.-1-r--T-.-r--^--,-.-r—.-
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 SO 90
2 er
Figure 1. XRD pattern of the prepared ZnO nanoparticles
The morphology of the prepared ZnO nanoparticles (bare or silica-coated) was determined via electron microscopy. SEM and TEM micrographs are presented in Fig. 2. The micrograph reveals spherical ZnO nanoparticles (diameter -10-20 nm) (Fig. 2a) and ZnO nanoparticles coated with a layer of silica -8 nm (Fig. 2b). The silica coating had no influence on the morphology of the ZnO nanoparticles.
Introduction of the prepared nanoparticles into PM-MA resulted in rather homogenous and uniform dispersion (Fig. 3). Neither areas of highly agglomerated solid particles nor larger areas clear of ZnO addition are observed. Such ZnO-PMMA composites are used for their ther-mo-oxidative degradation study.
The thermal stability of the pure PMMA or ZnO-PMMA nanocomposites is studied using TG-DTA-QMS experiments (Fig. 4). The basic idea is to show that the addition of ZnO into PMMA alters the thermal decomposition of such composites, either from a chemical point of view or/and with respect to the temperature interval of the
Japic et al.: Effect of ZnO on the Thermal Degradation Behavior ...
538
Acta Chim. Slov. 2016, 63, 535-543
Figure 2. SEM and TEM micrographs of a) bare ZnO and b) silica-coated spherical ZnO nanoparticles
*	'fjr
#	V V J - ''
TV'i* > *
Figure 3. ZnO distribution in PMMA (STEM image)
decomposition. Although the TG-DTA curves describing thermal decomposition of samples A-C are rather similar, there are some distinguishing differences among them. Pure PMMA (sample A) decomposes in one broad interval from ~230 °C to ~380 °C (Fig. 4a). According to the DTG and DTA curves, at least two steps may be recognized inside this broad interval. The first step at around 300 °C is rather vague while the second step, with its peak temperature ~355 °C, may be clearly identified. The chain scission of sample A in synthetic air is practically complete, since less than 0.01% residue remains after the analysis. Volatile products of the decomposition followed by the QMS reveal the presence of H2O (m/e 18), CO2 (m/e 44), CO (m/e 28), MeOH (m/e 31), propanoic acid methyl ester (PAME) with a characteristic signal at m/e 88 and methacrylic acid (MA) with characteristic signal m/e 41. All volatile products are evolved continuously throughout the degradation path and their relative intensities are in accordance with the DTG curve.
If bare ZnO nanoparticles are admixed to PMMA (sample B2), the temperature interval of the thermal decomposition does not change significantly with respect to pure PMMA (Figs 4a and 4b). It is shifted to somewhat
higher values but remains inside the range from ~240 °C to ~400 °C. However, the profiles of the TG curve and, consequently, the DTG and DTA curves change. In the latter case, inside the decomposition interval of ZnO-PMMA, the DTG curve predicts one additional distinctive step. The additional step with peak temperature at ~295 °C is reflected in a relatively quick mass change and is not characteristic for the thermal decomposition of pure PMMA without the addition of ZnO. The remaining (main) decomposition steps with peak temperatures of ~320 °C and ~355 °C are similar to pure PMMA decomposition. All decomposition steps are exothermic and may also be recognized in the DTA curve. Volatile products during thermal decomposition of ZnO-PMMA are generally the same as in the case of pure PMMA. However, the relative intensities of the various detected m/e signals change significantly with temperature if ZnO is added into PMMA. The ZnO addition particularly intensifies signals m/e 88 (PAME) and m/e 41 (MA) during the first decomposition step at ~295 °C. Such behavior of ZnO clearly demonstrates its catalytic nature toward PMMA thermal decomposition. It is evident that the addition of ZnO does not change the nature of the decomposition process. Instead, it influences temperature intervals of intense degradation especially during the early stages. From this perspective, ZnO in PMMA behaves similarly to TiO2. TiO2 was also reported to act catalytically for PMMA thermal degradation that is accompanied by MeOH, PAME and MA evolution.16
To further clarify the role of ZnO during the thermal decomposition of PMMA, silica-coated ZnO nanopartic-les were also incorporated into PMMA. As expected from the fact that silica does not catalytically promote the thermal decomposition of PMMA, the sequences of evolved gases for samples C (silica-coated ZnO-PMMA) and A (pure PMMA) are rather similar (Figs 4a and 4c). The coating of ZnO nanoparticles with silica substantially diminish the degradation step at ~290 °C. This first degradation step is not negligible, however; it is ascribed to the fact that the minor part of ZnO nanoparticles may be poorly coated.
Japic et al.: Effect of ZnO on the Thermal Degradation Behavior
Acta Chim. Slov. 2016, 63, 535-539	543

Figure 4. TG-DTG-DTA curves and QMS signals for thermal decomposition of samples A, B2 and C
The detected volatile products during the ZnO-PM-MA decomposition suggest acid-base interaction between the ZnO surface and PMMA matrix. This interaction involves acidic electron-accepting OH groups at the ZnO surface and basic electron-donating carbonyl functional groups of PMMA. Such interaction between COO- of PMMA and metal-oxide surface is accompanied by Me-OH elimination and has been proposed for several metal oxides, including Al2O3,40 Mg(OH)2,41 TiO219 and ZnO.33 Subsequently, at the ZnO surface, Ma and PAME are generated by random chain scission.
In addition to the catalytic effect of ZnO nanopartic-les during the early stages of PMMA thermal degradation, their stabilizing role must also be considered. It is evident from Fig. 5 that the small addition of ZnO or silica-coated ZnO nanoparticles into PMMA shifts the temperature region towards somewhat higher temperatures. Normally, the enhanced thermal stability of such a composite is explained by means of polymer chain mobility restriction due to steric hindrance caused by the presence of solid particles or simply by the fact that metal oxide particles have higher thermal conductivity and greater heat capa-
city values than PMMA and thus absorb the heat transmitted from the surroundings and retard the direct thermal impact to the polymer backbone.42,43 Such physical causes for the improved thermal stability of the composite are also in accordance with the measured data. Specifically, the temperature regions of PMMA decomposition for samples B2 and C are practically identical. The only difference among these two samples, regarding their thermal stability, arises from already described catalytic behavior of ZnO around 295 °C. Above or below the region of ZnO catalytic activity, both TG curves progress identically, indicating the same impact on PMMA thermal degradation for ZnO and silica-coated ZnO nanoparticles.
Stabilizing or destabilizing effects of metal oxide addition into PMMA on the thermal degradation of the composite should have its reflection in degradation kinetic parameters. In order to determine apparent activation energy Ea of PMMA or PMMA-composite degradation, dynamic weight loss data at various ¡3 from the TG analysis were used. The results of Ea vs degree of conversion (a) relationship are shown in Fig. 6. It appears that the addition of 0.1% of solid nanoparticles (bare ZnO or coated
Japic et al.: Effect of ZnO on the Thermal Degradation Behavior ...
540
Acta Chim. Slov. 2016, 63, 535-543
200	300	400
77* C
Figure 5. TG-DTG curves for a) filler free PMMA (Sample A), b) PMMA with the addition of nanosized ZnO (Sample B2) and c) PMMA with the addition of silica-coated nanosized ZnO (Sample C)
Since the addition of ZnO into PMMA simultaneously stabilizes and destabilizes the thermal stability of PMMA, a critical addition of ZnO was further systematically investigated in order to distinguish between these two opposite effects. For this purpose, a series of ZnO-PMMA composites were prepared with the addition of ZnO 0.05%, 0.10%, 0.15% and 0.20% (samples B1, B2, B3 and B4, respectively) and submitted to further thermal analysis. The TG curves of the B-series ZnO-PMMA composites are shown in Fig. 7. Evidently, any addition of ZnO into PMMA shifts the TG curves to higher decomposition temperature intervals with respect to pure PMMA. Therefore, 0.20% of ZnO in PMMA stabilizes thermal stability of the composite for ~25 °C by shifting the main decomposition peak from ~350 °C (pure PMMA) to ~375 °C (sample B4). Moreover, with increasing amounts of ZnO the additional TG step (at ~295 °C in the case of sample B2) slowly starts to form.
ZnO) raises Ea of the material's thermal degradation. Such a result is in accordance with the already described stabilizing effect during thermal degradation when solid particles are added into PMMA.30-32 However, by comparing the average Ea values for samples A-C, an interesting result is observed. The Ea of pure PMMA was calculated as 145 kJ/mol. If 0.1% bare ZnO is admixed into PMMA, the Ea of thermo-oxidative degradation increases to 155 k-J/mol. In contrast, if 0.1% silica-coated ZnO is added into PMMA, the Ea value further increases to 190 kJ/mol. Rather noticeable differences between the calculated Ea values of samples A-C indicate the double role of ZnO in the ZnO-PMMA composite. In addition to the stabilizing effect that increases the Ea value (comparison between samples A and B2), ZnO also acts catalytically toward PMMA degradation by considerably lowering the Ea value if sample B2 is compared to sample C.
Figure 7. TG curves of PMMA and B-series of ZnO-PMMA composites with various addition of ZnO
Figure 6. Ea vs a relationship for PMMA or PMMA-composites thermal decomposition
When B-series samples are submitted to the Vyazov-kin method of partial kinetic analysis, the Ea values are calculated (Fig. 8). It appears that the addition of 0.05% ZnO into PMMA (Sample B1) does not change the average Ea value of the composite thermal degradation relative to pure PMMA. The highest Ea 215 value kJ/mol was determined for sample B3 (0.15% ZnO), while further increased amount of ZnO again slightly lowered the Ea value to 190 kJ/mol (Sample B4). Such behavior may be explained by means of the stabilizing/catalytic effect of ZnO on the thermal stability of PMMA. With relatively small additions of ZnO, its stabilizing effect prevails over the catalytic activity. The smallest addition of ZnO into PMMA apparently represents sufficient steric hindrance for polymer chain mobility; however, the ZnO/PMMA interface simultaneously remains relatively low, not contributing significantly to the composite thermal degradation. The stabilizing effect reaches its
Japic et al.: Effect of ZnO on the Thermal Degradation Behavior ...
Acta Chim. Slov. 2016, 63, 535-541	543

Figure 8. Ea vs a relationship for B-series ZnO-PMMA composites (PMMA is added for the comparison)
peak when 0.15% ZnO is dispersed throughout PMMA. In contrast, the catalytic effect of ZnO becomes significant above 0.15% due to the increased ZnO/PMMA interface.
Another important characteristic of ZnO-PMMA composites is their transparency for UV and visible light. For practical applications final material should absorb UV light but transmit visible light. As shown in Figure 9 pure PMMA (sample A) is transparent for UV and visible light. However, small addition of ZnO into PMMA (sample B2) practically completely absorbs UV light. At the same time the material remains transparent for visible light. Similar effect is achieved also when silica coated ZnO nanopartic-les are added into PMMA (sample C). Such material likewise absorbs UV light due to ZnO content, whereas in the region of visible light silica-coated ZnO/PMMA nano-composite exhibit only slightly lower transmittance then ZnO/PMMA composite.
Figure 9. Light transmittance as a function of wavelength of pure PMMA (sample A), nanocomposite ZnO/PMMA (sample B2), silica-coated ZnO/PMMA (sample C)
4. Conclusion
The thermal properties of ZnO-PMMA nanocompo-sites are investigated via TG-DTA-EGA analyses. The filler-free PMMA thermally decomposes in one broad interval composed of at least two consecutive and partially overlaying steps. Volatile products of the decomposition are determined as H2O, CO2, CO, MeOH, PAME and MA. All volatile products are evolved continuously throughout the degradation path.
By adding ZnO into PMMA, two opposite effect are recognized. Any addition of ZnO into PMMA thermally stabilizes the composite by delaying the occurrence of major polymer cracking and thus shift the TG curves to higher decomposition temperatures. The stabilizing role of ZnO is explained by means of physical grounds, i.e. steric hindrance caused by ZnO for polymer chain mobility and heat absorption by ZnO through relatively higher thermal conductivity and greater heat capacity. In contrast, during the early stages of PMMA thermal decomposition, ZnO acts also catalytically by intensifying the decomposition rate. Through the detected volatile products during the ZnOPMMA decomposition, the catalytic acid-base interaction between ZnO surface and PMMA matrix is suggested.
The critical addition of ZnO into PMMA, in which the catalytic effect prevails over the stabilizing effect due to increased ZnO/PMMA interface, is determined between 0.15-0,20% ZnO. Generally, the addition of ZnO does not change the nature of the decomposition process. Instead, it influences temperature intervals of intense PM-MA degradation.
5. Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Slovenian Research Agency (programme P1-0175(C)).
6. References
1.	A. Laachachi, D. Ruch, F. Addiego, M. Ferriol, M. Cochez, J. M. Lopez Cuesta, Polym Degrad Stab. 2009, 94, 670-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.12.022
2.	W. U. Huynh, J. J. Dittmer, A. P. Alivisatos, Sci. 2002, 295, 2425-2427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1069156
3.	H. Gu, J. Guo, H. Wei, S. Guo, J. Liu, Y. Huang, M. A. Khan, X. Wang, D. P. Young, S. Wei, Z. Guo, Adv. Mater. 2015, 28;27(40), 6277-6282.
4.	C. Yang, H. Wei, L. Guan, J. Guo, Y. Wang, X. Yan, X. Zhang, S. Wei, Z. Guo, J. Mater. Chem. A. 2015, 3, 1492914941. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5TA02707A
5.	D. Jiang, L. Xing, L. Liu, S. Sun, Q. Zhang, Z. Wu, X. Yan, J. Guo, Y. Huang, Z. Guo, Composites Science and Techno-
Japic et al.: Effect of ZnO on the Thermal Degradation Behavior ...
542
Acta Chim. Slov. 2016, 63, 535-543
logy. 2015, 117, 168-175
http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.05.011
6.	T. M. Aminabhavi, H. T. S. Phayde, J. D. Ortego, J. M. Verg-naud, Polym. 1996, 37, 1677-1688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(96)83718-9
7.	R. L. Ballard, J. P. Williams, J. M. Njus, B. R. Kiland, Eur. Polym. J. 2001, 37, 381-398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-3057(00)00105-1
8.	A. Nair, R. L. White, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1996, 60, 1901-1909. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960613)60: 11<1901::AID-APP14>3.0.C0;2-3
9.	J. Brandrup, E. H. Immergut, E. A. Grulke, Polymer handbook 4th ed: Wiley,. New York, 2003, pp 1999.
10.	J. W. Gilman, S. J. Ritchie, T. Kashiwagi, S. M. Lomakin, Fire Mater. 1997, 21, 23-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1018(199701)21: 1<23::AID-FAM591>3.0.C0;2-0
11.	T. C. Chang, Y. T. Wang, Y. S. Hong, Y. S. Chiu, J Polym Sci Part A: Poly Chem. 2000, 38, 1972-1980. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0518(20000601)38:11 <1972::AID-P0LA60>3.0.C0;2-5
12.	T. Kashiwagi, A. B. Morgan, J. M. Antonucci, M. R. Van-Landingham, R. H. Harris, W. H. Awad, J. R. Shields, J Appl Polym Sci. 2003, 89, 2072-2078. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.12307
13.	Y. H. Hu, C. Y. Chen, C. C. Wang, Polym DegradStab. 2004, 84, 545-553.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.02.001
14.	A. B. Morgan, J. M. Antonucci, M. R. VanLandingham, R. H. Harris, T. Kashiwagi, Polym Mater Sci Eng. 2000, 83, 57-58.
15.	F. Yang, G. L. Nelson, J Appl Polym Sci. 2004, 91, 38443850. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.13573
16.	A. Aruchamy, K. A. Blackmore, B. J. J. Zelinshi, D. R. Uhl-manm, C. Booth, MRS Proc. 1991, 249, 353-357.
17.	A. Laachachi, M. Cochez, M. Ferriol, J. Lopez-Cuesta, E. Leroy, Mater Lett. 2005, 59, 36-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016Zj.matlet.2004.09.014
18.	A. Laachachi, E. Leroy, M. Cochez, M. Ferriol, J. M. Lopez Cuesta, Polym Degrad Stab. 2005, 89, 344-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.01.019
19.	A. Laachachi, M. Ferriol, M. Cochez, D. Ruch, J. M. Lopez-Cuesta, Polym Degrad Stab. 2008, 93, 1131-1137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.03.006
20.	Y. Liu, Y. Liu, C. Zhang, H. Tan, X. Yan, H. Wei, Z. Guo, Macromolecular Materials and Engineering. 2015, 300, 6469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mame.201400166
21.	E. Tang, G. Cheng, X. Ma, Powder Technol. 2006, 161, 209214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2005.10.007
22.	E. Tang, G. Cheng, X. Pang, X. Ma, F. Xing, Colloid Polym Sci. 2006, 284, 422-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00396-005-1389-z
23.	M. M. Demir, K. Koynov, U. Akbey, C. Bubeck, I. Park, I. Lieberwirth, G. Wegner, Macromol. 2007, 40, 1089-1100.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma062184t
24.	X. Y. Ma, W. D. Zhang, Polym Degrad Stab. 2009, 94, 11031109.
http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.03.024
25.	T. Kos, A. Anzlovar, E. Zagar, Z. Crnjak Orel, M. Zigon, Acta Chim Slov. 2014, 61, 497-505.
26.	A. Anzlovar, Z. Crnjak Orel, K. Kogej, M. Zigon, JNanoma-ter. 2012, 2012, art.no.760872, 9.
27.	J. Sharma, X. Zhang, T. Sarker, X. Yan, L. Washburn, H. Qu,. Z. Guo, A. S. Kucknoor, S. Wei, Polymer. 2014, 55, 32613269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016Zj.polymer.2014.05.028
28.	Z. L. Wang, J Phys Condens Matter. 2004, 16, R829-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/16/25/R01
29.	L. Schmidt-Mende, J. L. MacManus-Driscoll, Mater Today. 2007, 10, 40-48.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(07)70078-0
30.	D. Sun, N. Miyatake, H. J. Sue, Nanotechnol. 2007, 18, 215606-215612.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/18/21/215606
31.	P. Liu, Z. Su, J Macromol Sci Part B. 2006, 45, 131-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222340500408085
32.	M. M. Demir, M. Memesa, P. Castignolles, G. Wegner, Macromol Rapid Commun. 2006, 27, 763-770. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/marc.200500870
33.	S. C. Liufu, H. N. Xiao, Y. P. Li, Polym Degrad Stab. 2005, 87, 103-110.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.07.011
34.	J. Du, J. Zhu, C. A. Wilkie, J. Wang, Polym Degrad Stab. 2002, 77, 377-381.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(02)00074-5
35.	J. Zhu, F. M. Uhl, A. B. Morgan, C. A. Wilkie, Chem Mater.
2001,	13, 4649-4654. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm010451y
36.	B. N. Jang, M. Costache, C. A. Wilkie, Polym. 2005, 46, 10678-10687.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2005.08.085
37.	D. Japic, I. Djerdj, M. Marinsek, Z. Crnjak Orel, Acta Chim Slov. 2014, 60, 797-806.
38.	S. Liu, L. Lu, Z. Yang, P. Cool, E. F. Vansant, Mater Chem Phys. 2006, 97, 203-206.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.09.003
39.	S. Vyazovkin, J Therm Anal. 1997, 49, 1493-1499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01983708
40.	Y. Grohens, J. Schultz, R.E. Prud'homme, Int J Adhes Ad-hes. 1997, 17, 163-167.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0143-7496(96)00035-8
41.	I. C. McNeill, M. H. Mohammed, Polym Degrad Stab. 1995, 48, 189-195.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0141-3910(95)00031-G
42.	S. Zulfigar, K. Masud, Polym Degrad Stab. 2002, 78, 305313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(02)00176-3
43.	T. C. K. Yang, S. S.Y. Lin, T. H. Chuang, Polym Degrad Stab.
2002,	78, 525-532.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(02)00225-2
Japic et al.: Effect of ZnO on the Thermal Degradation Behavior
Acta Chim. Slov. 2016, 63, 535-543
543
Povzetek
Z uporabo termoanalitskih tehnik je bila določena vloga nanodelcev ZnO pri termični dekompoziciji polimetilmetakri-lata (PMMA). Za študij sistema ZnO/PMMA smo uporabili tehnike TG, DTA, EGA, XRD, SEM in TEM. Nanodelci ZnO so bili sintetizirani s precipitacijsko metodo z dodajanjem LiOH v raztopino Zn2+ v mešanici topil H2O in etilen-glikol. Nanokompoziti ZnO/PMMA so bili pripravljeni z ustreznim dodatkom ZnO v MMA in kasnejšo radikalsko po-limerizacijo MMA. Glede na rezultate testov in kinetične izračune aktivacijske energije termičnega razpada PMMA, ima dodatek ZnO v PMMA dvojno vlogo. Dodatek ZnO v PMMA do 0,15% stabilizira kompozit, saj premakne temperaturno okno razpada kompozita k višjim vrednostim in hkrati zviša aktivacijsko energijo termičnega razpada PMMA. Obratno, dodatek ZnO nad 0,15% v ZnO/PMMA kompozitu na razpad PMMA deluje katalitsko, saj zniža aktivacijsko energijo termičnega razpada PMMA in hkrati premakne temperaturno okno razpada kompozita k nižjim vrednostim. Dodatek ZnO ne spremeni mehanizma razpada PMMA.
Japic et al.: Effect of ZnO on the Thermal Degradation Behavior ...