The Frequency of Music Improvisation Activities in the Fourth and Fifth Grade of Primary School Alja Krevel* 1 and Jerneja Žnidaršič 2 • The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the fre - quency of the implementation of music improvisation activities in music lessons by classroom teachers and subject teachers teaching music in the fourth and fifth grade in Slovenian primary schools. We also explored the teachers’ sense of competence to implement music improvisation activities, reasons for the infrequent inclusion of such activities and solutions for more frequent inclusion. A descriptive nonexperimental method of research was used, collecting data with a questionnaire. The study found that teachers occasionally carry out music improvisation activities, most often rhythmic improvisation. The results showed no differences between the frequency of improvisation activities between classroom teachers and subject teachers. However, subject teachers do feel more competent to perform music improvisation activities than classroom teachers and there was a weak correlation between the sense of competence and the frequency of improvisation activities in music lessons. Teachers cite a lack of time, knowledge and self-confidence as the key reasons for the infrequent implementation of music improvi - sation activities. They see solutions for the more frequent inclusion of music improvisation activities in additional music improvisation train - ing and changes in the music curricula, advocating for more flexible and broadly defined learning objectives. Due to the small sample size, the results are not generalisable, but they do provide an insight into the cur - rent state of the integration of music improvisation activities in music lessons in the fourth and fifth grade of primary school. Keywords: classroom teachers, general music, music improvisation, primary school, subject teachers 1 *Corresponding Author. Faculty of Education, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia; alja.krevel@um.si. 2 Faculty of Education, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1783 Published on-line as Recently Accepted Paper: April 2024 c e p s Journal the frequency of music improvisation activities in the fourth and fifth grade of ... 2 Pogostost dejavnosti glasbene improvizacije v četrtem in petem razredu osnovne šole Alja Krevel in Jerneja Žnidaršič • Namen te raziskave je bil preučiti in primerjati pogostost izvajanja dejavnosti glasbene improvizacije pri pouku glasbene umetnosti med učitelji razrednega pouka in učitelji predmetnega pouka, ki poučujejo predmet glasbene umetnosti v četrtem in petem razredu slovenskih osnovnih šol. Raziskali smo tudi občutek kompetentnosti učiteljev za izvajanje dejavnosti glasbene improvizacije, razloge za redko vključe - vanje teh dejavnosti in rešitve za pogostejše vključevanje. Uporabljena je bila deskriptivna neeksperimentalna metoda raziskovanja, pri čemer smo podatke zbrali z vprašalnikom. Raziskava je pokazala, da učitelji občasno izvajajo dejavnosti glasbene improvizacije, najpogosteje ritmič - no improvizacijo. Rezultati niso pokazali razlik v pogostosti improviza - cijskih dejavnosti med učitelji razrednega in predmetnega pouka. Kljub temu se učitelji predmetnega pouka čutijo kompetentnejše za izvajanje dejavnosti glasbene improvizacije kot učitelji razrednega pouka, med občutkom kompetentnosti in pogostostjo izvajanja improvizacijskih de - javnosti pri pouku glasbene umetnosti pa se je pokazala šibka korelacija. Učitelji kot ključne razloge za redko izvajanje dejavnosti glasbene im - provizacije navajajo pomanjkanje časa, znanja in samozavesti. Rešitve za pogostejše vključevanje dejavnosti glasbene improvizacije vidijo v do - datnem usposabljanju v glasbeni improvizaciji in spremembah učnega načrta za glasbeno umetnost v osnovni šoli, pri čemer se zavzemajo za prožnejše in širše opredeljene učne cilje. Zaradi majhnosti vzorca rezul - tati niso posplošljivi, vendar nudijo vpogled v aktualno stanje vključe - vanja dejavnosti glasbene improvizacije pri pouku glasbene umetnosti v četrtem in petem razredu osnovne šole. Ključne besede: glasbena improvizacija, osnovna šola, pouk glasbe, učitelji razrednega pouka, učitelji predmetnega pouka c e p s Journal 3 Introduction High-quality music education contributes significantly to the holistic development of the individual (Brdnik Juhart & Sicherl Kafol, 2021; Pesek, 1997; Sicherl Kafol, 2001) and is fulfilled through musical performance, musical lis - tening and musical creative activities, which are constantly intertwined (Boro - ta, 2013; Ministrstvo za šolstvo in šport in Zavod Republike Slovenije za šolstvo, 2011; Sicherl Kafol, 2001). In addition to musical recreation, creativity in music is roughly comprised of the two activity subfields of composition and improvi - sation (Nettl, 1974), which differ in the degree of planning and in the creative process itself. Hargreaves (1999) describes improvisation as the generation of new musical ideas without rearrangement, whereas composition may involve the reworking of musical material. In its strictest sense, music improvisation is defined as the spontaneous process of making music in real time (Alperson, 1984; The Cambridge Academic Content Dictionary) and is one of the most complex forms of creative activity (Beegle, 2010). Improvisation goes beyond the shaping of the individual’s musical world and prepares them to live in a modern, complex world where ‘improvisational’ action and constant adapta - tion to change at every turn is almost an imperative (Montouri, 2003). In the field of music pedagogy, improvisation is a sensitive topic. De - spite the growing efforts to establish its presence in children’s music education (Chandler, 2018; Larsson & Georgii-Hemming, 2019) and a better understand - ing of its beneficial effects on the individual’s cognitive (Azzara, 2002; Nav - arro Ramón & Chacón-López, 2021) and social development and interactions (Berkowitz, 2010; Burnard & Boyack, 2013; Diaz Abrahan et al., 2022; Sawyer, 2006), the question of whether improvisation can be learned at all remains a matter of debate at all educational levels (Van der Schyff, 2019). While some embrace the view that, especially in children, improvisation can only be en - couraged and nurtured (Hickey, 2009; Lanier, 2022; Wright & Kanellopoulos, 2010), others propose detailed procedures for teaching improvisational skills (Azzara, 1999; Torres, 2018; Whitcomb, 2013). These refer to different types of improvisation, most notably vocal and instrumental (Koutsoupidou, 2005; Whitcomb, 2005), melodic and rhythmic (Gruenhagen & Whitcomb, 2014), and individual and group improvisation (Beegle, 2010; Koutsoupidou, 2005; Sawyer, 1999). Research shows that teachers most often perform rhythmic and melodic improvisation, mainly in a call-and-response format, immediately fol - lowed by the use of untuned and tuned instruments (Whitcomb, 2007), with vocal improvisation being less common than instrumental improvisation (Koutsoupidou, 2005). Some advocate so-called free improvisation, in which the frequency of music improvisation activities in the fourth and fifth grade of ... 4 there are no well-defined frameworks for music making and the concept of freedom holds a central position (Hickey, 2009; Higgins & Mantie, 2013; Monk, 2013; Ng, 2018) along with musical communication between individuals (Hick - ey, 2009; Monk, 2013). At the opposite pole on the spectrum of limitations in improvisation activities is structured improvisation. Here, the focus is on teach - er guidance and music-theoretical rules (Rebne & Saetre, 2020) that promote the development of musical skills and the acquisition of musical knowledge (Brophy, 2005; Coulson & Burke, 2013; Guilbault, 2009; Whitcomb, 2013). Some authors (Beegle, 2010; Edmund & Keller, 2019) argue that it is important to keep a balance between the two when implementing music improvisation activities. Notwithstanding the different perspectives on encouraging and/or teaching improvisation, in recent years there has been a greater understanding and appreciation of improvisation activities that focus on the process and the experience that students gain from it. Hickey (2009) argues that music improv - isation is not merely a product that can be learned in a strict methodological and pedagogical sense; its quality is to foster a process that emerges in freedom and allows for self-actualisation, which is also evident in the creative process of other areas (Juriševič, 2011). Campbell (2009) argues that the music improvi - sation activity, more than any other musical experience, provides the learner with a holistic musical education in which music theory, aural perception and performance are richly intertwined. Improvisation is worth implementing in primary school music lessons because it provides experiences of risk and fos - ters spontaneity, exploration and collaboration (Higgins & Mantie, 2013). Research shows mixed results regarding the inclusion frequency of im - provisation activities in music lessons (Chandler, 2018). While music improvi - sation is one of the least popular musical activities (Byo, 1999) and is given very little time (Gruenhagen & Whitcomb, 2014), a study by Whitcomb (2007) found that 81% of the participating New Y ork City teachers include improvisa - tion in the teaching process, while improvisation is also a regular feature in the first three years of primary school according to the results of a study conduct - ed by Orman (2002) in the eastern region of the United States. In a study on the integration of improvisation activities in music lessons in English primary schools, Koutsoupidou (2005) found that 76% of the 67 teachers who partici - pated in the study practised improvisation on their own initiative. The main reasons teachers give for not using improvisation are a lack of experience with improvisation and a lack of knowledge of the theoretical aspects of improvisa - tion, but the insufficient level of music improvisation activities is also due to reduced classroom discipline, as perceived by teachers, and a lack of time. The author also found that more experienced and older teachers are more likely c e p s Journal 5 to include improvisation activities than inexperienced and younger teachers. Only 19% of the teachers surveyed had experienced improvisation in their own primary education, which is an illuminating statistic. It is also interesting to note that no correlation was found between teachers’ competences and the type of improvisation activities they used (instrumental, vocal, movement). Fur - thermore, Whitcomb (2007) indicates a strong correlation between the imple - mentation of improvisation activities and teachers’ previous experience gained in workshops, conferences and studies. In a later paper (Whitcomb, 2013), the author highlights the insufficient knowledge and skills of teachers in imple - menting music improvisation and suggests combining improvisation activities with other musical activities to maximise the economical use of time. Despite the general positive attitudes of classroom teachers towards mu - sic teaching, Šober (2021) found that the musical background and additional musical experience of teachers significantly influenced their choice of music activities in their music lessons. Even though student teachers acquire all of the necessary knowledge and skills for high-quality music teaching during their studies, it is evident in practice that teachers who do not have a strong musical background from the outset must seek continuous professional development (Šober, 2021). T eachers frequently avoid composing or improvising in their own music instruction when they feel uncomfortable in executing these activities (Odena, 2001). Teachers’ beliefs about their own creativity have a significant impact on the degree to which creativity is encouraged in the classroom and the value they place on creativity (Rubenstein et al., 2013; Sak, 2004). Moreover, research shows that classroom teachers often feel self-conscious when teaching music (Holden & Button, 2006; King, 2018; Poulter & Cook, 2019; Seddon & Biasutti, 2008; Stunell 2010; Vitale, 2020). Research (Bell, 2003; Brophy, 2002; Madura W ard-Steinman, 2007; Mul - let et al., 2016) further suggests that most music teachers experience feelings of self-consciousness and a lack of confidence in their ability to perform improvi - sation activities. In addition to a lack of improvisational experience in music teaching (Bernhard & Stringham, 2016; Gruenhagen & Whitcomb, 2014), issues such as a lack of time (Russell-Bowie, 2009; Wiggins & Wiggins, 2008) and the sense of chaos that comes with performing improvisation activities (Campbell, 2009) are also significant. In their research, Hickey and Schmidt (2019) studied the effect of professional development on the level of integration of improvisa - tion and compositional activities in music teaching. They point to a lack of con - fidence and a lack of practical experience with improvisation as two key reasons teachers give for not sufficiently incorporating creative activities, and see the solution in better professional development of teachers, which is reflected in the frequency of music improvisation activities in the fourth and fifth grade of ... 6 teachers’ better understanding of creative music activities and a higher level of implementation of such activities. In a more recent study, Nikolaou (2023) con - ducted 13 music improvisation workshops with primary education university students. After the workshops, about half of the students (46%) expressed that they felt confident as future classroom teachers to implement music improvisa - tion activities in their music lessons (Nikolaou, 2023). In her research on musical creativity in Slovenian primary schools, Črčinovič Rozman (2009) found that music lessons at the classroom level focus on creative activities alongside music (e.g., fine art creativity and movement to music) rather than music-making activities, i.e., composition or improvisation. Moreover, teachers are not fully familiar with strategies for implementing mu - sic composition and improvisation. Nevertheless, both teachers and students expressed satisfaction with the level of music-making activities in the class - room. To encourage music improvisation in the classroom, the author suggests that the topic be better addressed in university curricula and that short semi - nars for teachers be held on the subject. Markelj (2014) studied the integration of music-making activities in music lessons at the classroom level. The results showed that teachers with higher levels of music education are more likely to include certain types of music-making activities. The author also found that teachers from the first to the third grade of primary school include rhythmic improvisation and creative music-didactic games more often than teachers from the fourth and fifth grade. However, the study’s small sample size and uneven distribution of teachers based on their musical education suggest that these findings should be interpreted with caution (Markelj, 2014). The balance between the musical activity domains of performing, lis - tening and creating is central to the holistic musical development of a young person. It is therefore important to integrate music-making activities into the music curriculum. Improvisation is worth encouraging in primary school mu - sic lessons, as it nurtures and encourages risk-taking, spontaneity, exploration, collaboration and play (Higgins & Mantie, 2013). As there is a lack of research in Slovenia on the frequency of music improvisation activities in music educa - tion – with the exception of one master’s thesis (Markelj, 2014) and the con - tribution of Črčinovič Rozman (2009), which covers the whole field of music creativity at the primary school classroom level – the present research aimed to gain an insight into the frequency of music improvisation activities in the fourth and fifth grade of primary school. The Slovenian Primary School Act (Zakon o osnovni šoli, 1996, Art. 38) states that, in the first period of primary school (grades 1–3), the compulsory curriculum, including the subject of mu - sic, is taught by the classroom teacher. In the third period of primary school c e p s Journal 7 (grades 7–9), all subjects are taught by subject teachers. 3 In exceptional cases, a classroom teacher may also teach in grade 6. Music lessons in the second period (grades 4–6) may be taught by both a classroom teacher and a subject teacher. Accordingly, we also wanted to examine differences in the frequency of music improvisation activities between classroom and subject teachers. Some research suggests that classroom teachers tend to feel uncomfortable teaching music (Holden & Button, 2006; Poulter & Cook, 2019), and we were interested to see whether this is also reflected in the frequency and structure of music improvisation activities in music lessons. The main objectives of the research are to determine (1) the frequency of different types of music improvisation activities in music lessons in the fourth and fifth grade, (2) teachers’ sense of competence to implement music improvisation activities, and (3) reasons for the infrequent implementation of music improvi - sation activities and possible solutions for their more frequent implementation. Research Questions The following research questions were posed in the study: RQ 1.1: How often do teachers implement music improvisation activities in mu - sic lessons in the fourth and fifth grade of primary school? RQ 1.2: Are there differences in the frequency of music improvisation activities in music lessons in the fourth and fifth grade between classroom and subject teachers? RQ 1.3: Which types of music improvisation activities do teachers most fre - quently implement in music lessons in the fourth and fifth grade? RQ 2.1: What proportion of teachers feel fully competent to execute music im - provisation activities? RQ 2.2: Are there differences in the sense of competence to execute music im - provisation activities between classroom and subject teachers? RQ 2.3: Is there a correlation between the frequency of music improvisation activities in music lessons and teachers’ sense of competence to execute music improvisation activities? RQ 3.1: What reasons do teachers give for the infrequent implementation of music improvisation activities in music lessons in the fourth and fifth grade? 3 Techers carry out educational work in the school (Zakon o osnovni šoli, 1996). Classroom teachers have completed a bachelor’s degree programme in Primary Education, while subject teachers have completed a bachelor’s degree programme in a specific subject. In our case, subject music teachers have completed a bachelor’s degree programme in Music Education (Pravilnik o izobrazbi učiteljev in drugih strokovnih delavcev v izobraževalnem programu osnovne šole, 2011). the frequency of music improvisation activities in the fourth and fifth grade of ... 8 RV 3.2: What solutions do teachers suggest for the more frequent inclusion of music improvisation activities in music lessons in the fourth and fifth grade? Method This study utilises a descriptive non-experimental method of educa - tional research. Sample The study was based on a random sample of classroom teachers ( n = 46) and subject teachers ( n = 20) who teach music lessons in the fourth and/or fifth grade of primary school. There were nine subject teachers who teach in both the fourth and fifth grade. Primary school teachers from different regions of Slovenia were randomly invited to participate in the survey. Instruments For the purpose of the survey, an online questionnaire (1.ka) was de - signed with a combination of closed and open-ended questions and a six-point Likert-type rating scale. The questionnaire includes general demographic ques - tions (gender, age group, teaching specialisation, years of work experience, sta - tistical region in which the teachers teach), two Likert-type rating scales where the teachers indicated their perception of the frequency with which music im - provisation activities (and specific types of activities) are included in their mu - sic lessons, two closed-ended multiple-choice questions on the teachers’ own assessment of their sense of competence to execute music improvisation activi - ties and reasons for rarely carrying out music improvisation activities, and an open-ended question on suggested solutions for the more frequent inclusion of music improvisation activities. Research Design The data for the study were collected through an online survey question - naire from January to April 2022. A total of 126 teachers commenced filling in the questionnaire, but only 82 of them fully or partially completed it. All of the partially completed questionnaires were excluded from further analysis. Thus, 66 fully completed questionnaires were obtained for the final analysis. c e p s Journal 9 The data obtained from the closed-ended questions and Likert scales were quantitatively analysed using IBM SPSS version 27.0 for statistical data processing using descriptive, correlational and inferential statistics. Frequency distributions of variables ( f, f %) and basic descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation) were used. Due to the small sample size and the uneven distribution of the data, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare independent samples and the Friedman test was used to compare dependent samples (with post-hoc Wilcoxon signed ranks test). The Spearman correla - tion coefficient was also calculated. Responses to the open-ended question were qualitatively analysed by coding. Results and Discussion The results of the survey will be presented according to the sequence of the research questions. RQ 1.1: How often do teachers implement music improvisation activities in music lessons in the fourth and fifth grade of primary school? The classroom and subject teachers indicated the frequency of music improvisation activities (1 – never, 2 – very rarely or once per marking period, 3 – rarely or 2–3 times per marking period, 4 – occasionally or once per month, 5 – very frequently or 2–3 times per month, 6 – always or every lesson). The marking period in Slovenian primary school lasts five months and there are two marking periods in one school year. On average, both the classroom and the subject teachers implement music improvisation activities in music lessons occasionally (once per month) ( f % = 37.9%; Me = 4; SD = 0.98) (Figure 1). Based on previous research indicating the unpopularity of music improvisation activities among teachers (Byo, 1999; Gruenhagen & Whitcomb, 2014), but nev - ertheless revealing a sufficient level of engagement with such activities (Orman, 2002; Whitcomb, 2007), we inferred that teachers do occasionally perform mu - sic improvisation activities. None of the respondents indicated that they do not include music improvisation activities in their teaching process, which is an encouraging finding. the frequency of music improvisation activities in the fourth and fifth grade of ... 10 Figure 1 Frequency of music improvisation activities in music lessons RQ 1.2: Are there differences in the frequency of music improvisation activities in music lessons in the fourth and fifth grade between classroom and subject teachers? No studies were found in the literature examining differences in the frequency of music improvisation activities between classroom teachers and subject teachers, although some research suggests that classroom teachers feel uncomfortable teaching music (King, 2018; Seddon & Biasutti, 2008; Stunell 2010; Vitale, 2020). Related to this, we were interested in whether classroom teachers are therefore also less likely to engage in music improvisation activities than subject teachers. However, no statistical differences were found between classroom and subject teachers in the frequency of implementing improvisa - tion activities in music lessons ( U = 432.5; p = .688; p > .05). It is assumed that the results are a reflection of the small sample size, but they may indicate a broader problem of the absence of music improvisation activities in music les - sons, independent of the teaching specialisation or educational background. RQ 1.3: Which types of music improvisation activities do teachers most frequently implement in music lessons in the fourth and fifth grade? The literature review revealed different results on the popularity of dif - ferent types of improvisation. While Whitcomb (2007) cites the most frequent c e p s Journal 11 use of rhythmic and melodic call-and-response activities, Koutsoupidou (2005) points out that teachers most frequently perform improvisation activities on in - struments, while vocal improvisation is the least frequent. It was therefore as - sumed that rhythmic and instrumental improvisation are the more frequently performed types of improvisation compared to melodic and vocal improvisation. The teachers surveyed ( N = 66) rated the frequency of each type of music im - provisation activity on a six-point rating scale (1 – never, 2 – very rarely or once per marking period, 3 – rarely or 2–3 times per marking period, 4 – occasionally or once per month, 5 – very frequently or 2–3 times per month, 6 – always or every lesson). The findings presented in Table 1 indicate that, on average, both the classroom and the subject teachers occasionally implement various types of music improvisation activities: instrumental ( Me = 4.00; SD = 0.93), vocal ( Me = 4.00; SD = 1.10), rhythmic ( Me = 4.00; SD = 1.07) and melodic ( Me = 4.00; SD = 1.08). Based on the arithmetic mean, it is evident that rhythmic improvisation is nevertheless the most frequent type of music improvisation activity ( M = 4.21; SD = 1.07) compared to the others. This result is consistent with previous scientific findings, but suggests that only rhythmic improvisation is more popular. Table 1 Descriptive statistics on the frequency of performing types of music improvisation activities instrumental improvisation vocal improvisation rhythmic improvisation melodic improvisation M 3.70 3.76 4.21 3.71 Me 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Mo 4 4 4 4 SD 0.93 1.10 1.07 1.08 Given the results, we were interested to see whether there were statisti - cally significant differences in the frequency with which each type of music im - provisation was included. Due to the small sample size and the non-normal dis - tribution of the data, we used the non-parametric Friedman test, which showed statistically significant differences in the frequency of inclusion of each type of music improvisation (χ²(3) = 18.308, p < .001). The Friedman test mean ranks are presented in Table 2. Further analysis by performing the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test showed that the teachers include rhythmic improvisation statisti - cally significantly more often than melodic, instrumental and vocal improvisa - tion (see Table 3). the frequency of music improvisation activities in the fourth and fifth grade of ... 12 Table 2 Friedman test mean ranks Types of music improvisation activity Mean rank Instrumental improvisation 2.26 Vocal improvisation 2.46 Rhythmic improvisation 2.96 Melodic improvisation 2.32 Table 3 Wilcoxon Signed Rank test – pairwise comparisons of types of music improvisation activities Type of music improvisation – pairs Z p Vocal/instrumental -.729 .466 Melodic/rhythmic -3.729 <.001 Rhythmic/instrumental -3.892 <.001 Melodic/vocal -2.190 .827 Melodic/instrumental -.119 .905 Rhythmic/vocal -3.163 .002 RQ 2.1: What proportion of teachers feel fully competent to execute music improvisation activities? Based on previous studies highlighting the importance of improvisation experiences in education and professional development (Koutsoupidou, 2005; Schmidt, 2019; Whitcomb, 2007), it was foreseen that at least half of the teach - ers would feel fully competent to execute music improvisation activities. The results of the present study showed that 51.5% ( f = 34) of the surveyed teachers (N = 66) feel fully competent and 25.8% ( f = 17) feel sufficiently competent to execute music improvisation activities when following someone else’s precise instructions, while 15 of the teachers ( f % = 22.7) do not feel sufficiently compe - tent to execute music improvisation activities. RQ 2.2: Are there differences in the sense of competence to execute music improvisation activities between classroom and subject teachers? No studies were found in the literature comparing the sense of compe - tence to perform music improvisation activities between classroom teachers c e p s Journal 13 and subject teachers. Given the scientific findings showing that classroom teachers feel uncomfortable teaching music, mainly due to insufficient musical experiences during their education (King, 2018; Stunell, 2010; Vitale, 2020), it was hypothesised that classroom teachers feel less competent to perform mu - sic improvisation activities than subject teachers. When the difference in sense of competence between classroom and subject teachers was examined, it was found that more than a third of the classroom teachers surveyed ( f % = 41.3%) and three-quarters of the subject teachers ( f % = 75.0%) feel fully competent to carry out music improvisation activities (see Table 4). After conducting a Mann-Whitney U test, it was found that there are statistically significant dif - ferences between the classroom and subject teachers in their sense of compe - tence to execute music improvisation activities ( U = 315.5; p = .027; p < .05). The results indicate that subject teachers feel fully competent to carry out music improvisation activities to a greater extent than classroom teachers. Table 4 Percentage of the teachers’ sense of competence to execute music improvisation activities – comparison between classroom and subject teachers Teaching specialisation Do you feel competent enough to execute music improvisation activities? f f % Classroom teacher Yes, completely. 19 41.3 Yes, if I am following someone else’s precise instructions. 15 32.6 No. 12 26.1 Total 46 100.0 Subject teacher Yes, completely. 15 75.0 Yes, if I am following someone else’s precise instructions. 2 10.0 No. 3 15.0 Total 20 100.0 RQ 2.3: Is there a correlation between the frequency of music improvisation activities in music lessons and teachers’ sense of competence to execute music improvisation activities? Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was calculated to determine the relationship between the frequency of music improvisation activities and the teachers’ sense of competence to execute such activities in the classroom. The value of the coefficient ( ρ = 0.33) indicates a statistically significant weak corre - lation between the two variables ( p = .003). The results show that teachers who the frequency of music improvisation activities in the fourth and fifth grade of ... 14 feel competent to execute music improvisation activities are also more likely to implement such activities in their music lessons. The literature suggests that a sense of competence contributes significantly to the frequency of music im - provisation activities in music lessons (Odena, 2001; Rubenstein et al., 2013; Sak, 2004). RQ 3.1: What reasons do teachers give for the infrequent implementation of music improvisation activities in music lessons in the fourth and fifth grade? The teachers who indicated in the questionnaire that they rarely or never execute music improvisation activities ( n = 19) gave reasons for this. Of these teachers, 57.9% indicated that the reason for not including music improvisation activities often is a lack of time, followed by a lack of knowledge to undertake such activities ( f % = 52.6%) and a lack of self-confidence ( f % = 42.1%). None of the respondents indicated a lack of motivation to do so, or that they con - sider such activities irrelevant for the musical development of their students. Just under a quarter of the teachers ( f % = 21.1%) indicated that the reason for executing an insufficient quantity of music improvisation activities was a lack of student interest, while one respondent also mentioned behavioural problems and student restlessness. The literature also suggests that a lack of improvisation experience (Bernhard & Stringham, 2016; Gruenhagen & Whitcomb, 2014) and a lack of time are key factors for the lack of implementation of music improvi - sation activities in music lessons (Russell-Bowie, 2009; Wiggins & Wiggins, 2008). RV 3.2: What solutions do teachers suggest for the more frequent inclusion of music improvisation activities in music lessons in the fourth and fifth grade? Both the classroom and the subject teachers surveyed identify solutions for the more frequent inclusion of music improvisation activities in additional teacher training in this area, with a focus on an increased offer of quality semi - nars and Slovenian literature, as well as changes in lesson planning. They be - lieve that the curriculum for the subject of music should be looser, with more broadly formulated learning objectives that allow greater scope for the intro - duction of improvisational content. They also cite cross-curricular connections as a way of encouraging such activities. Some propose increasing the number of weekly music lessons. Difficulties with problematic student behaviour are also c e p s Journal 15 mentioned, and teachers cite the establishment of better discipline, the devel - opment of student etiquette and more independent work by students as solu - tions. One of the solutions highlighted is to have an adequately sized classroom and a sufficient number and range of instruments, as this makes it easier to carry out improvisation activities. Some of the teachers state that this is sim - ply the teacher’s decision, thus highlighting the teacher’s own initiative. Based on the results obtained, we can summarise that much of the responsibility for the frequency of the implementation of improvisation activities rests with the teachers themselves and their own desire. An adequate classroom size and a sufficiently large range of instruments is undoubtedly a facilitating factor, as is a certain amount of flexibility in the planning of music lessons, but it is up to the teachers themselves to understand and perceive the value of implementing music improvisation activities for the benefit of the students. Particularly in the Slovenian context, insufficient training is available on implementing music improvisation activities; therefore, more professional training and literature on the topic might be considered. Conclusion The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of music improvi - sation activities in the fourth and fifth grade of primary school by compar - ing classroom teachers and subject teachers. It was found that both groups of teachers implement music improvisation activities occasionally in their music lessons. It would be interesting to study the frequency of music improvisation activities using a more qualitative research approach, as this would provide an insight into the structure of improvisation activities and the definition of such activities from the teachers’ perspective, which would provide a holistic picture of the implementation of music improvisation in music lessons. No differences were found between classroom teachers and subject teachers in the frequency of improvisation activities. It is assumed that different results would have been obtained if the sample had been larger and more balanced according to the teachers’ teaching specialisation. It would be beneficial to conduct research on the implementation of music improvisation by music teachers at every grade level in primary school, comparing the practices of classroom teachers and subject teachers. This would provide a broader perspective on the implemen - tation of improvisation in primary school. It would also be worth examining differences in the frequency of music improvisation activities according to the three primary school periods (grades 1–3, 4–6 and 7–9, respectively). Accord - ing to the teachers surveyed in the present research, the most popular type the frequency of music improvisation activities in the fourth and fifth grade of ... 16 of improvisation is rhythmic improvisation. To elaborate these results, an in- depth survey should be carried out asking teachers about the specific improvi - sation activities (e.g., call-and-response, continuation of a musical motif, etc.) that they execute in the music classroom. Only about half of the teachers sur - veyed feel fully competent to carry out music improvisation activities, which points to possible improvements in the content of university education and in the provision of professional development. It was found that subject teachers feel more competent to carry out music improvisation activities than classroom teachers, which can be linked to the different structure of university education of the two groups: many classroom teaching students have not acquired any musical experience by the time they start their studies, whereas an entrance test for musical aptitude is compulsory for entry to the music education pro - gramme and requires a basic mastery of singing and playing an instrument as well as fundamental music-theoretical concepts. The sense of competence in performing improvisation activities is thus likely to reflect the overall structure of teachers’ musical skills and knowledge, which may vary considerably be - tween classroom and subject teachers. The results of the study also show that a greater sense of competence is associated with a higher level of implementation of improvisation activities in music lessons. Interestingly, although a higher percentage of subject teachers felt competent to execute music improvisation activities, they did not implement these activities to a greater extent in their music lessons than classroom teachers. We believe that a larger sample would have yielded different results. In addition to insufficient time, teachers cited a lack of knowledge about improvisation and a lack of confidence as reasons for the infrequent inclusion of improvisation activities. An increased emphasis on music improvisation activities during studies and, in particular, a greater offer of professional training and literature in Slovenian on the subject could significantly change the perception of music improvisation and consequently encourage teachers to implement improvisation more frequently in their music lessons. Teachers themselves also cite the need for additional training, along with changes in planning music lessons. The study was limited to a small sample size, so the findings cannot be generalised to the entire Slovenian population of classroom and subject teach - ers who teach music in the fourth and fifth grade. Moreover, when interpret - ing the results, it should be borne in mind that the answers are an expression of teachers’ subjective assessment and opinion, which is not necessarily a rep - resentation of the real situation. Given the number of teachers who failed to adequately complete the questionnaire, it is evident that only those who were enthusiastic and willing to participate did so. c e p s Journal 17 The present research provides a current insight into the frequency of the implementation of music improvisation activities in music lessons in the fourth and fifth grade of primary school, but the results are not generalisable due to the small sample size. As more than ten years have passed since the last major research on the state of musical creativity in music lessons at the class - room level of primary education in Slovenia (Črčinovič Rozman, 2009), there is a need for up-to-date research that includes both quantitative and qualitative research approaches and addresses the implementation of music improvisation across the whole primary education vertical. References Alperson, P . (1984). On musical improvisation. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 43 (1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/430189 Azzara, C. D. (1999). An aural approach to improvisation. Music Educators Journal, 86 (3), 21–25. https://www.doi.org/10.2307/3399555 Azzara, C. D. (2002). Improvisation. In R. Colwell, & C. Richardson (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 171–187). Oxford University Press. Beegle, A. (2010). A classroom-based study of small-group planned improvisation with fifth-grade children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58 (3), 219–239. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0022429410379916 Bell, C. L. (2003). Beginning the dialogue: Teachers respond to the National Standards in Music. Bul- letin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 156, 31-42. Berkowitz, A. L. (2010). The improvising mind: Cognition and creativity in the musical moment. Oxford University Press. Bernhard, H. C., & Stringham, D. A. (2016). A national survey of music education majors’ confidence in teaching improvisation. International Journal of Music Education , 34(4), 383–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761415619069 Borota, B. (2013). Glasbene dejavnosti in vsebine [Musical activities and content]. Univerzitetna založba Annales. Brdnik Juhart, P ., & Sicherl Kafol, B. (2021). Music teachers’ perception of music teaching at the stage of early adolescence. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 11 (3), 97–118. Brophy, T. S. (2002). Toward improving music teacher education. Arts Education Policy Review, 104(2), 3-8. Brophy, T. S. (2005). A longitudinal study of selected characteristics of children’s melodic improvisa - tions. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53 (2), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345513 Burnard, P ., & Boyack, J. (2013). Engaging interactively with children’s group improvisation. In P . Burnard, & R. Murphy (Eds.), Teaching music creatively (pp. 25–36). Routledge. Byo, S. J. (1999). Classroom teachers’ and music specialists’ perceived ability to implement the Na - the frequency of music improvisation activities in the fourth and fifth grade of ... 18 tional Standards for Music Education. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47 , 111–123. https://www.doi.org/10.2307/3345717 Campbell, P . S. (2009). Learning to improvise music, improvising to learn music. In G. Solis, & B. Nettl (Eds.), Musical improvisation: Art, education, and society (pp. 119-142). University of Illinois Press. Chandler, M. D. (2018). Improvisation in elementary general music: A review of the literature. Up- date: Applications of Research in Music Education, 37(1), 1–7 . https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123318763002 Coulson, A. N., & Burke, B. M. (2013). Creativity in the elementary music classroom: A study of students’ perceptions. International Journal of Music Education, 31 (4), 428–441. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0255761413495760 Črčinovič Rozman, J. (2009). Musical creativity in Slovenian elementary schools. Educational Re- search, 51(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880802704749 Diaz Abrahan, V ., Justel, N., & Shifres, F. (2022). Musical improvisation: A mixed methods study on social interactions in younger and older adults. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 32 (1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/08098131.2022.2055115 Edmund, D. C., & Keller, E. C. (2019). Guiding principles for improvisation in the general music classroom. Journal of General Music Education, 33 (2), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1048371319885361 Gruenhagen, L. M., & Whitcomb, R. (2014). Improvisational practices in elementary general music classrooms. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61 (4), 379–395. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0022429413508586 Guilbault, D. M. (2009). The effects of harmonic accompaniment on the tonal improvisations of students in first through sixth grade. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57 (2), 81–91. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0022429409337201 Hargreaves, D. J. (1999). Developing musical creativity in the social world. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 142, 22–34. Hickey, M. (2009). Can improvisation be “taught”? A call for free improvisation in our schools. Inter- national Journal of Music Education, 27 (4), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761409345442 Hickey, M., & Schmidt, C. (2019). The effect of professional development on music teachers’ improvi - sation and composition activities. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 222, 27–43. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.222.0027 Higgins, L., & Mantie, R. (2013). Improvisation as ability, culture, and experience. Music Educators Journal, 100 (2), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432113498097 Holden, H., & Button, S. W . (2006). The teaching of music in the primary school by the non-music specialist. The British journal of music education, 23(1), 23–38. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S0265051705006728 Juriševič, M. (2011). Postgraduate students’ perception of creativity in the research process. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 1 (1), 169–190. King, F. (2018). Music activities delivered by primary school generalist teachers in Victoria: Inform - ing teaching practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43 (4), 175–186. c e p s Journal 19 Koutsoupidou, T. (2005). Improvisation in the English primary music classroom: Teachers’ percep - tions and practices. Music Education Research, 7(3), 363–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613800500324432 Lanier, M. A. (2022). Experiences of musical improvisation: Self-individuation and participatory sense-making. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 41(3), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/87551233221104654 Larsson, C., & Georgii-Hemming, E. (2019). Improvisation in general music education: A literature review. British Journal of Music Education, 36 (1), 49–67. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S026505171800013X Madura Ward-Steinman, P . (2007). Confidence in teaching improvisation according to the K-12 achievement standards. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 172, 25–40. Markelj, P . (2014). Vključevanje glasbene ustvarjalnosti v pouk glasbene umetnosti na razredni stopnji [Integrating musical creativity into classroom music teaching] [Bachelor thesis, Univerza v Mari - boru, Pedagoška fakulteta]. Ministrstvo za šolstvo in šport in Zavod Republike Slovenije za šolstvo [Ministry of Education and Sport and the Institute of Education of the Republic of Slovenia]. (2011). Učni načrt: program osnovna šola; glasbena vzgoja [Curriculum: Primary School Programme; Music Education] . Ministrstvo za šolstvo in šport in Zavod Republike Slovenije za šolstvo. Monk, A. (2013). Symbolic interactionism in music education: Eight strategies for collaborative improvisation. Music Educators Journal, 99 (3), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432112467823 Montouri, A. (2003). The complexity of improvisation and the improvisation of complexity. Human Relations, 56(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726703056002893 Mullet, D., Willerson, A., Lamb, K., & Kettler, T. (2016). Examining teacher perceptions of creativity: A systematic review of the literature. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.001 Navarro Ramón, L., & Chacón-López, H. (2021). The impact of musical improvisation on children’s creative thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 100839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100839 Nettl, B. (1974). Thoughts on improvisation: A comparative approach. The Musical Quarterly, 60(1), 1–19. Ng, H. H. (2018). Collective free music improvisation as a sociocommunicative endeavor: A litera - ture review. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 37(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123318784109 Nikolaou, E. (2023). Encouraging creativity through music improvisation activities: Pre-service primary general teacher-students’ reflections and beliefs. International Journal of Music Education, OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/02557614231178925 Odena, O. (2001). Developing a framework for the study of teachers’ views of creativity in music education. Goldsmiths Journal of Education, 4(1), 59–67. Orman, E. K. (2002). Comparison of the National Standards for Music Education and elementary music specialists’ use of class time. J ournal of Research in Music Education, 50(2), 155–164. the frequency of music improvisation activities in the fourth and fifth grade of ... 20 https://www.doi.org/10.2307/3345819 Pesek, A. (1997). Otroci v svetu glasbe [Children in the world of music]. Založba Mladinska knjiga. Poulter, V ., & Cook, T. (2019). Teaching music in the early years in schools in challenging circum - stances: Developing student teacher competence and confidence through cycles of enactment. Educa- tional Action Research, 30(2), 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1765185 Pravilnik o izobrazbi učiteljev in drugih strokovnih delavcev v izobraževalnem programu osnovne šole [Rules on the educational qualification of teachers and other education staff in the primary school education programme]. (2011). Uradni list RS, št. 109/11, 10/12, 92/12, 49/13, 75/15 in 85/22. http://pisrs.si/Pis.web/pregledPredpisa?id=PRAV10943 Rebne, R., & Saetre, J. H. (2020). Improvisation in primary school settings. In G. Gravem Johansen, K. Holdhus, C. Larsson, & U. MacGlone (Eds.), Expanding the space for improvisation pedagogy in music: A transdisciplinary approach (pp. 133–146). Routledge. Rubenstein, L. D., McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2013). Teaching for creativity scales: An instru - ment to examine teachers’ perceptions of factors that allow for the teaching of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25 , 324–334. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.813807 Russell-Bowie, D. (2009). What me? Teach music to my primary class? Challenges to teaching music in primary schools in five countries. Music Education Research, 11(1), 23–36, https://www.doi.org/10.1080/14613800802699549 Sak, U. (2004). About creativity, giftedness, and teaching the creatively gifted in the classroom. Roeper Review, 26, 216–222. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/02783190409554272 Sawyer, R. K. (1999). Improvised conversations: Music, collaboration, and development. Psychology of Music, 27(2), 192–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735699272009 Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Group creativity: Musical performance and collaboration. Psychology of Music, 34(2), 148–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735606061850 Seddon, F., & Biasutti, M. (2008). Non-music specialist trainee primary school teachers’ confidence in teaching music in the classroom. Music Education Research, 10(3), 403–421. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/14613800802280159 Sicherl Kafol, B. (2001). Celostna glasbena vzgoja: Srce-um-telo [Integrated music education: Heart- mind-body]. Debora. Stunell, G. (2010). Not musical? Identity perceptions of generalist primary school teachers in relation to classroom music teaching in England. Action, Criticism & Theory for Music Education, 9(2), 79–107. Šober, A. (2021). Priprava učiteljev na pouk glasbene umetnosti [Preparation of teachers for music instruction] [Master’s thesis, Univerza na Primorskem, Pedagoška fakulteta]. The Cambridge Academic Content Dictionary (n.d.). Improvisation . In The Cambridge Academic Content Dictionary. Retrieved October 27, 2023. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/improvisation Torres, B. (2018). Extending the discussion: Introductory improvisation applications for elementary educators. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 37(1), 49–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123318791254 c e p s Journal 21 Van der Schyff, D. (2019). Improvisation, enaction, and self-assessment. In D. J. Elliott, M. Silverman, & G. McPherson (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophical and qualitative assessment in music edu- cation (pp. 318–345). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190265182.013.15 Vitale, J. F. (2020). Exploring the fears of pre-service generalists in the music classroom. In B. W . Andrews (Ed.), Perspectives on arts education research in Canada, volume 2 (pp. 47–75). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004431409_003 Whitcomb, R. (2005). A description of improvisational activities in elementary general music class- rooms in the state of Illinois [Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois]. Whitcomb, R. (2007). Improvisation in elementary general music: A survey study. Kodály Envoy, 34(1), 5–10. Whitcomb, R. (2013). Teaching improvisation in elementary general music: Facing fears and fostering creativity. Music Educators Journal, 99 (3), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432112467648 Wiggins, R. A., & Wiggins, J. (2008). Primary music education in the absence of specialists. Interna- tional Journal of Education & the Arts, 9 (12), 1–26. http://www.ijea.org/v9n12/ Wright, R. A., & Kanellopoulos, P . (2010). Informal music learning, improvisation and teacher educa - tion. British Journal of Music Education, 27 (1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051709990210 Zakon o osnovni šoli [Primary School Act] (ZOsn). (1996). Uradni list RS, št. 81/06, 102/07, 107/10, 87/11, 40/12 – ZUJF, 63/13, 46/16 – ZOFVI-K, 76/23. http://www.pisrs.si/Pis.web/pregledPredpisa?id=ZAKO448 Biographical note Alja Krevel is a teaching assistant in the field of music didactics at the Faculty of Education at University of Maribor, Slovenia. Her research interests include music teaching and learning, musical creativity, the impact of music on children’s development as well as teacher education and their professional development. Jerneja Žnidaršič , PhD, is an assistant professor in the field of music didactics at the Faculty of Education, University of Maribor, Slovenia. Her main areas of research include interdisciplinary connections, implementation of arts and cultural education, listening to music, and more recently music creativity in educational settings.