A. MANIKANDAN et al.: INFLUENCE OF ZrB2 ON THE MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF AA6082/ZrB2 ... 327–332 INFLUENCE OF ZrB 2 ON THE MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF AA6082/ZrB 2 COMPOSITES VPLIV ZrB 2 NA MIKROSTRUKTURNE KARAKTERISTIKE AA6082/ZrB 2 KOMPOZITOV Arumugam Manikandan 1,2* , Meenakshi Sundaram Omkumar 1 , Vinayagam Mohanavel 3 1 Department of Manufacturing Engineering, College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, Sardar Patel Road, Chennai 600025, Tamilnadu, India 2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Agni College of Technology, Old Mahabalipuram Road, Chennai 600130, Tamilnadu, India 3 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kingston Engineering College, Chittoor Main Road, Vellore 632059, Tamilnadu, India Prejem rokopisa – received: 2018-07-01; sprejem za objavo – accepted for publication: 2018-12-06 doi: 10.17222/mit.2018.133 In a recent scenario, particulate-reinforced aluminium-matrix composites (AMCs) are used for plenty of applications in aero- space, non-structural, structural, transportation and automotive industries. This study concentrates on the manufacturing of AA6082/ZrB2 aluminium-matrix composites (AMCs) using a liquid metallurgy process. The zirconium diboride particles of three different weight percentage, i.e., (0, 3, 6 and 9) %, are reinforced with aluminium alloy (AA6082) using the stir casting technique. Hardness, tensile and compression tests were conducted to evaluate the mechanical behaviour. The microstructures of the composites were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The SEM microphotographs proved the successful dispersion of ZrB2 particles into the aluminium matrix. The tensile fracture surface of the prepared composites and the plain aluminium were examined with the SEM to understand the tensile fracture mechanism. Tensile fracture morphology reveals different modes of fractures, like brittle and ductile. The unreinforced AA6082 plain matrix alloys are subjected to a ductile mode of fracture, but with an increase in zirconium diboride the mode of failure gradually transforms to brittle fracture. The mechanical properties of the composites are improved after the dispersion of ZrB2 particles. A tremendous improvement in the mechanical properties of the AMCs was found for 9 w/% ZrB2 particles in the matrix. Keywords: tensile strength, fracture morphology, AA6082 alloy, compression strength Dandanes se kompoziti s kovinsko osnovo iz Al zlitin, ki so oja~ani z drobnimi karbidnimi delci (AMCs), uporabljajo za mnoge aplikacije v letalski, vesoljski, konstrukcijski (gradbeni), nekonstrukcijski, transportni in avtomobilski industriji. Ta {tudija se je osredoto~ila na izdelavo AMCs na osnovi AA6082/ZrB2 z uporabo metalurgije raztaljene kovine. Avtorji so cirkonijeve diboridne delce v treh razli~nih masnih dele`ih, to je (0, 3, 6 in 9) % vme{avali v Al zlitino (AA6082) s t.i. tehniko vme{avanja delcev v raztaljeno kovino in njenega intenzivnega preme{avanja (angl.: stir casting technique). Na preizku{ancih iz izdelanih kompozitov so dolo~ili trdoto, natezno in tla~no trdnost. Mikrostrukturo kompozitov so opazovali pod vrsti~nim elektronskim mikroskopom (SEM). SEM mikroposnetki so potrdili uspe{no disperzijo (enakomerno porazdelitev) ZrB2 delcev v matrici Al zlitine. Za razumevanje mehanizmov loma nateznih preizku{ancev ~iste Al zlitine in izdelanih kompozitov so uporabili SEM mikroposnetke. Morfologija preloma nateznih preizku{ancev je pokazala razli~ne tipe prelomov, od krhkega do `ilavega (duktil- nega). Neoja~ana, ~ista Al zlitina AA6082 je kazala popolnoma `ilav prelom. Z nara{~ajo~im dele`em dodanih Zr diboridnih delcev pa je prelom postopoma prehajal v krhki na~in. Mehanske lastnosti so se izbolj{evale s pove~evanjem disperzije ZrB2 delcev. Avtorji ugotavljajo, da je bistveno izbolj{anje mehanskih lastnosti AMCs nastopilo pri dodatku 9 w/% ZrB2 delcev. Klju~ne besede: natezna trdnost, morfologija preloma, zlitina AA6082, tla~na trdnost 1 INTRODUCTION Aluminium-matrix composites (AMCs) are exten- sively used in the aircraft, marine, automobile and defence sectors because of their outstanding strength-to- weight ratio, low thermal expansion, high wear resist- ance, etc. These are largely used in the fabrication of automobile components like drive shafts, pistons, cylinder liners and connecting rods. 1,2 There are different processing routes available for the production of AMCs. The processing routes can be divided into three groups, namely, liquid-state processing, semi-solid-state process- ing and solid-state processing. 3 The fabrication of AMCs by the liquid metallurgy route is inexpensive, simple, flexible and it is also applicable for mass production. 4 The liquid-state processing method contains either the incorporation of ceramic particles externally or formed inside the molten metal. The former is known as ex-situ (stir casting technique), while the latter is called an in- situ technique. 5 There are a massive number of techniques employed to produce the composites. Among them, stir casting is tremendously popular owing to its applicability for large volume production and low production costs. In the stir casting method, the matrix material was melted above the re-crystallization temperature in the furnace and the reinforcement particles were added into the molten metal to prepare the composite material. The properties of the composite material depend on the matrix material, rein- forcement particle, shape and size of the reinforcement, the volume percentage of the reinforcement and the spatial distribution of the particles in the matrix. The stir Materiali in tehnologije / Materials and technology 53 (2019) 3, 327–332 327 UDK 620.1:669.715:661.883.1 ISSN 1580-2949 Original scientific article/Izvirni znanstveni ~lanek MTAEC9, 53(3)327(2019) *Corresponding author e-mail: feb08.mani@gmail.com casting technique has shown some incomparable advant- ages, like the uniform distribution of particles in the matrix and strong interfacial bonding between the matrix and the particle. 6–8 In the recent times, a huge number research works have been going on by attempting different reinforcement materials into aluminium matrix to improve and enrich the properties of the composites. Ex-situ ceramic particles, such as TiC, B 4 C, SiC, TiB 2 , ZrB 2 ,S i 3 N 4 ,T i O 2 , have been extensively used as rein- forcements in AMCs. 9–11 Among these reinforcement particulates, (ZrB 2 ) is a potentially attractive class of reinforcement material for AMCs as it possesses a desirable combination of physical and mechanical pro- perties, including high strength, superior hardness, high young’s modulus, low density and also better wear resistance. Also, ZrB 2 does not react with molten alumi- nium to form reaction products at the interface of the matrix and reinforcement. 12–14 The fabrication of AA6082-alloy-based AMCs was reported in some literature as presented here. 15–18 Pardeep Sharma et al. 15 synthesized AA6082/Gr AMC by the stir casting technique and evaluated the mechanical and microstructure characteristics of the aluminium-matrix composites. A. Thangarasu et al. 16 fabricated AA6082/TiC composite AMCs using the stir casting route and investigated the influence of TiC particles on the mechanical and wear behaviour of the AMCs. They concluded that the TiC particles enhanced the hardness, tensile strength and wear resistance of the AMCs. Pardeep Sharma et al. 17 fabricated AA6082 aluminium reinforced Si 3 N 4 by the stir casting technique. They have analysed the role of Si 3 N 4 particulates on the micro- structure and mechanical properties of the AMCs. K. Ravikumar et al. 18 worked on AA6082 aluminium alloy-WC AMCs and reported the tensile surface mor- phological and mechanical properties of the developed composite. An extensive review of several research articles showed that no detailed findings are available for Al-ZrB 2 composites prepared through a stir casting route. The present study focuses on the production, mi- crostructure characterization and mechanical properties of ZrB 2 particulate-reinforced AA6082 alloy composites fabricated through the stir casting technique. The micro- structures of the AA6082 parent alloy and manufactured composites were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The SEM morphologies of the fracture surfaces were examined to understand the tensile fracture mechanism. 2 EXPERIMENTAL PART 2.1. Processing of composites In this work, aluminium alloy AA6082 (Si: 1.1 %, Fe: 0.2 %, Cu: 0.02 %, Mn: 0.8 %, Mg: 0.9 %, Zn: 0.1 %, Cr: 0.15 %, Ti: 0.08 % and Al: balance) was employed as the matrix material. Zirconium diboride (ZrB 2 )w a s chosen as reinforcement for the fabrication of the com- posite material in powder form. An SEM micrograph of ZrB 2 is shown in Figure 1. The SEM micrographs of the received ZrB 2 showed that the particles had a wide size distribution and irregular shape. The average size of the ZrB 2 particles was 40 μm. The AA6082 rods were melted using an electrical furnace in a graphite crucible. In order to remove the moisture content and gases in the particulates preheating of the ZrB 2 was carried at 400 °C for an hour. The stirrer was lowered into the crucible and was maintained at a constant speed of 400 min –1 . The temperature of the fur- nace was maintained at 850 °C and a calculated quantity of reinforcement particles was added to the molten aluminium. The melt was stirred erratically for the A. MANIKANDAN et al.: INFLUENCE OF ZrB2 ON THE MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF AA6082/ZrB2 ... 328 Materiali in tehnologije / Materials and technology 53 (2019) 3, 327–332 Figure 2: Photograph of a typical batch of castings Figure 1: SEM images of ZrB 2 particles duration of 20 min. After the execution of the process, the melt was poured into a preheated die. Castings were obtained for different weight fractions of particles as per the same procedure. Figure 2 displays a typical batch of castings. 2.2. Microstructure and mechanical testing The stir-cast composite samples were machined, po- lished using a standard metallographic procedure and etched with Keller’s reagent. The microstructure was observed using a scanning electron microscope attached with an energy-dispersive spectroscope. The microhard- ness of the base alloy and the prepared composites were estimated by conducting Vickers hardness testing at 0.5 Kgf load, which is applied constantly for a dwell time of 15 s. The measurement of the hardness was taken at six locations on each specimen to obtain an average value of the hardness. Tensile tests were carried out on the computerised 100 KN Servo hydraulic universal testing machine (Instron 8801) with a strain rate of 1.0 mm/min at room temperature. The tensile specimens were prepared as per the ASTM E8 standard, having a gauge length of 40 mm, a gauge width of 7 mm and a thickness of 6 mm. For every combination, three tests were conducted and the average values are reported. The compression strength of the base matrix alloy and the prepared composites were determined using a fully com- puterised universal testing machine. The compression specimens were prepared as per the ASTM E9 standard. 3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1. SEM and EDAX analysis of AA6082 alloy and AA6082/ZrB 2 composites Figure 3a presents the SEM images of the as-cast matrix AA6082 alloy. Figure 3b to 3e records the SEM microphotographs of the AA6082/ZrB 2 composites. The microstructural examination proves the continuous dissemination of ZrB 2 particles in the matrix and also shows the sharp and clear interface between the ZrB 2 particle content and the AA6082 matrix. This kind of dissemination is desirable as it helps to enhance the properties of the composites. The SEM images clearly show a clean and finer interface and strong bonding between the reinforcement and the matrix. It could improve the load bearing capacity of the composites. 5,14 Moreover, the Al matrix-ZrB 2 particle interface plays a vital role in deciding the mechanical properties of the composites. These findings agree with earlier studies by several researchers. 2,19,20 Figures 3f and 3g depict the energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX) of the AA6082 alloy and AA6082/ZrB 2 AMCs. The magne- sium (Mg) and silicon (Si) particles in AA6082 are conformed by carrying out EDAX analysis depicted in Figure 3f. The element peaks of aluminium and the chemical composition identified with a high-intensity peak were magnesium and silicon. The extra elements such as manganese and iron were identified with very low peaks in the AA6082 alloy. 17 Figure 3g depicts the EDAX pattern of 9 w/% ZrB 2 reinforced composite, it is noticed from the EDAX pattern that the main elements present are Al, Zr and B, which ensures that the elements are homogeneously dispersed throughout the matrix. 3.2. Effect of ZrB 2 in the AA6082 matrix on hardness The microhardness of the AA6082/ZrB 2 composites is plotted in Figure 4. The hardness was recorded to 46 HV at 0 w/% of ZrB 2 to 81 HV at 9 w/% of ZrB 2 . The hardness of the casted composites is linearly increased with the increase in ZrB 2 particle content. The improve- ment in hardness could be attributed to the continuous distribution of ZrB 2 in the matrix and the particulate strengthening effect of the AA6082 alloy. Several inves- tigators reported a similar trend that the incorporation of A. MANIKANDAN et al.: INFLUENCE OF ZrB2 ON THE MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF AA6082/ZrB2 ... Materiali in tehnologije / Materials and technology 53 (2019) 3, 327–332 329 Figure 3: SEM micrographs of AA6082/ZrB 2 composites containing ZrB 2 content; a) 0 w/% ZrB 2 ,b)3w/% ZrB 2 ,c)6w/% ZrB 2 , d and e) 9 w/% ZrB 2 , f) EDAX analysis of AA6082 alloy and g) EDAX analysis of AA6082/9 w/% ZrB 2 B 4 C, Al 2 O 3 , TiC, rice husk ash, Si 3 N 4 and AlN enhances the hardness of AMCs. 8,11,21,22 Baradeswaran et al. 23 stated an opposite trend, that an increase in the incorporation of graphite drastically decreases the hardness of the AMCs owing to the lubri- cating nature of graphite. Rajmohan et al. 24 showed that the incorporation of mica decreased the hardness of AMCs, thus enhancing the machinability of composites. An increase in hardness is reasonable, owing to the resistance provided to the indentation by the hard rein- forced particles. AA6082 with 9 w/% of ZrB 2 composites exhibited the greatest hardness. The accumulation of ZrB 2 particles in the AA6082 matrix enhances the surface area of the reinforcement and also reduces the matrix grain size. Therefore, the mechanical properties of the composites were notably increased with the in- crease in ZrB 2 content. 3.3. Effect of ZrB 2 in the AA6082 matrix on tensile strength Figure 5 displays the role of ZrB 2 particle content on the tensile strength of the AA6082/ZrB 2 composites. The tensile strength of the AMCs was increased from 138 MPa to 219 MPa because of the increasing weight fraction of ZrB 2 particles. A remarkable augmentation in the tensile strength of the composite was found at 9 w/% ZrB 2 particles in the matrix. A similar kind of enhance- ment in tensile strength while incorporating particles such as TIB 2 , AlN, TiC, Si 3 N 4 and WC was reported by investigators. 5,6,11,17,18,25 However, the inclusion of Gr, mica, ZrSiO 4 in aluminium alloy decreased the mechanical behaviour of the composites. 23,24,26 The reason for the enhancement of tensile strength in the AA6082/ZrB 2 composite is the incorporation of the hard nature of ZrB 2 particles in the soft AA6082 matrix. Moreover, the escalation in tensile strength may be ascribed to the uniform dissemination of reinforcement particles in the matrix, resulting in the effectual transfer of applied tensile load from the matrix to the reinforcement and thereby increasing the load-bearing capacity of the composites. 2,6,19 AA6082/9 w/% ZrB 2 AMCs showed a 62.31 % higher tensile strength compared to the unreinforced AA6082 alloy. This can be credited to the presence of an improved surface area of the reinforcement particle that provides massive resistance to the plastic deformation, which leads to improving the tensile strength of composites. 3.4. Tensile fracture surface analysis of AA6082/ZrB 2 composites The Figure 6 shows the tensile fracture morphology of the AA6082 alloy and the AA6082/ZrB 2 AMCs. The AA6082 alloy revealed ductile fracture behaviour with evenly disseminated, larger size voids noticed in the frac- ture surface, shown in Figure 6a. Figure 6b depicts how the incorporation of ZrB 2 particles extensively reduces the voids on the fracture surface. It can be ascribed to the grain refinement by the ZrB 2 particulates. Figure 6c re- A. MANIKANDAN et al.: INFLUENCE OF ZrB2 ON THE MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF AA6082/ZrB2 ... 330 Materiali in tehnologije / Materials and technology 53 (2019) 3, 327–332 Figure 4: Effect of hardness on wl%ofZrB 2 particles Figure 6: Fracture morphology of AA6082/ZrB 2 AMCs containing ZrB 2 :a)0w/%, b) 3 w/%, c) 6 w/% and d) 9 w/% Figure 5: Effect of tensile strength on w/% of ZrB 2 particles veals the smaller size voids compared to that of the base alloy. Moreover, the ZrB 2 particles are intact at several places owing to superior bonding with the matrix. Fig- ure 6d depicts how the flatness of the fractured surface increases with the enhanced weight fraction of ZrB 2 particle content. There are no voids around the particles, ensuring strong interfacial bonding between the matrix and the reinforcement. 2,19 The fracture surface analysis shows that the fabricated composite experienced a duc- tile nature of fracture at the microscopic level and brittle nature of fracture at the macroscopic level. 3.5. Effect of ZrB 2 in AA6082 matrix on compression strength The effect of ZrB 2 content on the compression strength of AA6082/ZrB 2 AMCs is revealed in Figure 7. The compression strength was noticed to increase with the increase of ZrB 2 particle content and it is remarkably higher than the compression strength of the non-rein- forced matrix alloy. The presence of hard ZrB 2 particles in the matrix serves as a barrier for the dislocation mo- vement. This barrier leads to enhance the compression strength of the AA6082/ZrB 2 composites. The incorpora- tion of ZrB 2 particles increases the mechanical bonding between the matrix and reinforcement. Therefore, the compression strength of AMCs increased to about 29.34 % while adding 9 w/% of ZrB 2 particle to the aluminium alloy. 4 CONCLUSIONS In the present experimental study, AA6082-alloy- based composites were manufactured through the stir casting method with several weight proportions of ZrB 2 and the characterization was performed with SEM. The mechanical properties of the AA6082 parent alloy and AA6082/ZrB 2 developed composite were measured. Based on the present research study, the following con- clusions are drawn: • Microstructural observations revealed that there was no interface reaction product between the ZrB 2 particles and the matrix during the production of the composites. • A homogeneous dissemination of ZrB 2 particles along the AA6082 aluminium matrix can be noticed in the SEM micrographs. • The manufactured composite of 9 w/% of ZrB 2 offers a maximum hardness of 81 HV. • The tensile strength of the composites was increased from 138 MPa to 219 MPa with respect to incorpo- ration of the weight fraction of ZrB 2 particles. Cor- respondingly, the hardness of the composites increases with increasing ZrB 2 weight fraction. • The tensile fracture surface analysis reveals different mode of failures, namely, ductile, brittle and ductile. The tensile fracture morphology of the AA6082/ZrB 2 AMCs shows the unified mode of fracture. • The AA6082/9 w/% of ZrB 2 composites revealed su- perior compression strength when compared to the parent matrix alloy. 5 REFERENCES 1 S. A. Sajjadi, H. R. Ezatpour, M. T. Parizi, Comparison of micro- structure and mechanical properties of A356 aluminum alloy/Al2O3 composites fabricated by stir casting and compo-casting processes, Materials and Design, 34 (2012), 106–111, doi:10.1016/j.matdes. 2011.07.037 2 I. Dinaharan, N. Murugan, S. Parameswaran, Influence of in situ formed ZrB2 particles on microstructure and mechanical properties of AA6061 metal matrix composites. Materials Science and Engi- neering A, 528 (2011), 5733–5740, doi:10.1016/j.msea.2011.04.033 3 S. A. Sajjadi, H. R. Ezatpour, H. Beygi, Microstructure and mecha- nical properties of Al-Al2O3 micro and nano composites fabricated by stir casting, Materials Science and Engineering A, 528 (2011), 8765–8771, doi:10.1016/j.msea.2011.08.052 4 R. K. Bhushan, S. Kumar, S. Das, Optimisation of porosity of 7075Al alloy 10% SiC composite produced by stir casting process through taguchi method, International Journal of Materials Engineer- ing Innovation, 1 (2009), 116–129, doi:10.1504/IJMatEI.2009. 024031 5 H. B. M. Rajan, S. Ramabalan, I. Dinaharan, S. J. Vijay, Synthesis and characterization of in situ formed titanium diboride particulate reinforced AA7075 aluminum alloy cast composites, Materials and Design, 44 (2013), 438–445, doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.008 6 V. Mohanavel, K. Rajan, M. Ravichandran, Synthesis, characteri- zation and properties of stir cast AA6351-aluminium nitride (AlN) composites, Journal of Materials Research, 31 (2016), 3824–3831, doi:10.1557/jmr.2016.460 7 K. N. B. Malik, E. Przelozynska, Analyses of AM50-Tip metal-metal composite microstructure, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 731 (2018), 1181–1187, doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.157 8 H. R. Ezatpour, M. T. Parizi, S. A. Sajjadi, Microstructure and me- chanical properties of extruded Al/Al2O3 composites fabricated by stir-casting process, Transaction of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 23 (2013), 1262–1268, doi:10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62591-1 9 Y. Pazhouhanfar, B. Eghbali, Microstructural characterization and mechanical properties of TiB2 reinforced Al6061 matrix composites produced using stir casting process, Materials Science and Engi- neering A, 710 (2018), 172–180, doi:10.1016/j.msea.2017.10. 087 A. MANIKANDAN et al.: INFLUENCE OF ZrB2 ON THE MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF AA6082/ZrB2 ... Materiali in tehnologije / Materials and technology 53 (2019) 3, 327–332 331 Figure 7: Effect of compression strength on w/% of ZrB 2 particles 10 S. Fale, A. Likhite, J. Bhatt, Compressive, tensile and wear behavior of ex-situ Al/AlN metal matrix nanocomposite, Journal of Composite Materials, 49 (2015), 1917–1930, doi:10.1177/0021998314540197 11 G. S. Pradeep Kumar, P. G. Koppad, R. Keshavamurthy, M. Alipour, Microstructure and mechanical behaviour of in situ fabricated AA6061-TiC metal matrix composites, Archives of Civil and Mecha- nical Engineering, 17 (2017), 535–544, doi:10.1016/j.acme.2016. 12.006 12 I. Dinaharan, N. Murugan, Dry sliding wear behavior of AA6061/ ZrB2 in-situ composite, Transaction of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 22 (2012), 810–818, doi:10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61249-1 13 X. Zhang, W. Li, C. Hong, W. Han, Microstructure and mechanical properties of ZrB2-Based composites reinforced and toughened by zirconia, International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology, 5 (2008), 499–504, doi:10.1111/j.1744.7402.2008.02199.x 14 N. Muralidharan, K. Chockalingam, I. Dinaharan, K. Kalaiselvan, Microstructure and mechanical behavior of AA2024 aluminum matrix composites reinforced with in situ synthesized ZrB2 particles, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 735 (2018), 2167–2174, doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.371 15 P. Sharma, S. Sharma, D. Khanduja, A study on microstructure of aluminium matrix composites, Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies, 3 (2015), 240–244, doi:10.1016/j.jascer.2015.04.001 16 A. Thangarasu, N. Murugan, R. Mohankumar, P. Thangapandi, Pro- cessing and characterization of AA6082/TiC composites by stir casting, Emerging Materials Research, 3 (2014), 123–129, doi:10.1680/emr.13.00043 17 P. Sharma, S. Sharma, D. Khanduja, Production and some properties of Si3N4 reinforced aluminium alloy composites, Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies, 3 (2015), 352–359, doi:10.1016/j.jascer.2015.07. 002 18 K. Ravikumar, K. Kiran, V. S. Sreebalaji, Characterization of mechanical properties of aluminium/ tungsten carbide composites, Measurement, 102 (2017), 142–149, doi:10.1016/j.measurement. 2017.01.045 19 J. David Raja Selvam, I. Dinaharan, In situ formation of ZrB2 part- iculates and their influence on microstructure and tensile behavior of AA7075 aluminum matrix composites, Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 20 (2017), 187–196, doi:10.1016/j.jestch.2016.09.006 20 V. Mohanavel, M. Naveen Kumar, K. Magesh Kumar, C. Jayasekar, N. Dineshbabu, S. Udishkumar, Mechanical behavior of in situ ZrB2/AA2014 composite produced by the exothermic salt-metal reaction technique, Materials Today: Proceedings, 4 (2017), 3215–3221, doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.207 21 J. Allwyn Kingsly Gladston, N. Mohamed Sherief, I. Dinaharan, J. David Raja Selvam, Production and characteristics of rich husk ash particulate reinforced AA6061 aluminum alloy composites by compocasting, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 25 (2015), 683–691, doi:10.1016/S1003-6326(15)63653-6 22 A. Lotfy, A. V. Pozdniakov, V. S. Zolotorevskiy, M. T. A. El-khair, A. Daoud, A. G. Mochugovskiy, Novel preparation of Al-5%Cu/BN and Si3N4 composites with analyzing microstructure, thermal and mechanical properties, Materials Characterization, 136 (2018), 144–151, doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2017.12.015 23 A. Baradeswaran, A. Elayaperumal, Effect of graphite on tribological and mechanical properties of AA7075 composites, Tribology Transactions, 58 (2015), 1–6, doi:10.1080/10402004.2014.947663 24 T. Rajmohan, K. Palanikumar, S. Ranganthan, Evaluation of mecha- nical and wear properties of hybrid aluminium matrix composites, Transaction of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 23 (2013), 2509–2517, doi:10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62762-4 25 B. Ashok Kumar, N. Murugan, Metallurgical and mechanical characterization of stir cast AA6061-T6-AlNp composite, Materials and Design, 40 (2012), 52–58, doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.038 26 K. Shirvanimoghaddam, H. Khayyam, H. Abdizadeh, M. Karbalaei Akbari, A. H. Pakseresht, F. Abdi, A. Abbasi, M. Naebe, Effect of B4C, TiB2 and ZrSiO4 ceramic particles on mechanical properties of aluminium matrix composites: Experimental investigation and pre- dictive modeling, Ceramic International, 42 (2016), 6206–6220, doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.12.181 A. MANIKANDAN et al.: INFLUENCE OF ZrB2 ON THE MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF AA6082/ZrB2 ... 332 Materiali in tehnologije / Materials and technology 53 (2019) 3, 327–332