Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(4): 517-526. doi: 10.2478/raon-2024-0052 517 research article Idarubicin-loaded drug-eluting microspheres transarterial chemoembolization for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics Spela Korsic1,2, Josko Osredkar3,4, Alojz Smid2,5, Klemen Steblovnik2,6, Mark Popovic7, Igor Locatelli4, Jurij Trontelj4, Peter Popovic1,2 1 Clinical Institute of Radiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 2 Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 3 Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 4 Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 5 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 6 Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 7 Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(4): 517-526. Received 5 August 2024 Accepted 28 August 2024 Correspondence to: Špela Koršič, M.D., Clinical Institute of Radiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. E-mail: spela.korsic@kclj-si. Disclosure: No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Background. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the treatment of choice for the intermediate stage hepa- tocellular carcinoma (HCC). Doxorubicin remains the most used chemotherapeutic agent in TACE, although in vitro screening has demonstrated that idarubicin exhibits greater cytotoxicity against HCC. This study aimed to evaluate safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of idarubicin-loaded drug-eluting microspheres TACE (DEMIDA-TACE) in inter- mediate stage HCC patients. Patients and methods. Between September 2019 and December 2021, 31 consecutive intermediate stage HCC patients (96.8% cirrhotic) were included to this study. 2 mL of LifePearlTM microspheres (100 µm) loaded with 10 mg of 1 mg/mL idarubicin were used for treatment. The adverse events, objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), time to TACE untreatable progression (TTUP), median overall survival (mOS), and pharmacokinetics were evaluated. Results. There were 68 TACE procedures performed. Adverse events grade ≥ 3 were noted after 29.4% procedures. The ORR was 83.9%, median PFS and TTUP were 10.5 months (95% CI: 6.8–14.3 months) and 24.6 months (95% CI: 11.6– 37.6 months), respectively. Median OS was 36.0 months (95% CI: 21.1–50.9 months). Significant differences between patients achieving objective response (OR) and those with progressive disease were observed regarding idarubicinol and combined idarubicin-idarubicinol plasma concentrations at 72 hours post-procedure, higher plasma concentra- tions were observed in patients achieving OR (p = 0.014 and 0.014; cut-off values 1.2 and 1.29 ng/mL, respectively). Conclusions. DEMIDA-TACE emerges as a safe and effective method of treatment for the intermediate stage HCC with low rates of adverse events alongside high tumor response, favourable disease control and overall survival. Idarubicinol and combined idarubicin-idarubicinol plasma concentrations at 72 hours post-procedure may serve as prognostic factors for achieving OR. Key words: hepatocellular carcinoma; drug-eluting microspheres transarterial chemoembolization; idarubicin; safe- ty; efficacy; pharmacokinetics Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(4): 517-526. Korsic S et al. / Idarubicin-loaded drug-eluting microspheres TACE in HCC patients518 Introduction Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most fre- quent primary liver cancer and therefore crucial global medical concern.1,2 According to the guidelines of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), tran- sarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the treat- ment of choice for the BCLC-B (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer) group, i.e. intermediate stage of HCC patients.3,4 Despite the wide use of TACE, treatment strate- gies and procedures are not standardized across different institutions. TACE can be performed as conventional TACE (cTACE) using lipiodol, or with drug-eluting microspheres (DEM-TACE).3,5 DEM- TACE allows slow release of chemotherapeutic agents, enhancing the duration and intensity of lo- cal ischemia.6-8 To date, the most used chemothera- peutic agent in TACE is doxorubicin, even though the evidence supporting its use is limited.9 In 2011, in vitro cytotoxicity screening aimed at selecting the most efficient drug against HCC evaluated 11 most used anticancer drugs. These included anthracyclines (doxorubicin, epirubicin, idarubicin and related mitoxantrone), platinum derivates (cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin), antimetabolites (5-flourouracil and gemcitabine), the alkylating antibiotic mitomycin C, and the taxane paclitaxel. Idarubicin proved to be the most toxic drug against HCC in vitro, moreover, it also demonstrated efficacy against the resistant SNU- 449 cell line where doxorubicin failed to achieve 50% cell death.9 Idarubicin is an anthracycline, to date mostly used for the treatment of acute leukaemia, when administrated intravenously. The superior cyto- toxicity of idarubicin towards HCC is presumed to result from its high hepatic penetration and highly lipophilic nature compared to other anthra- cyclines, resulting in high hepatic concentrations. High intracellular concentrations of idarubicin are necessary to achieve its cytotoxicity against multi- drug resistance (MDR) mechanisms.9 In the liver, idarubicin undergoes reduction to its metabolite idarubicinol, which retains pharmacological ac- tivity and is considered equipotent as the parent drug.10 Another important feature of idarubicin is its ability to be loaded in drug-eluting microspheres by positively charged protonated amine group of idarubicin hydrochloride interacting with negatively charged sulphonate group of micro- spheres.11-13 Moreover, the first results of in vivo phase I and II safety and efficacy trials of idarubicin use in cTACE and DEM-TACE have shown promising outcomes in terms of safety profiles and objec- tive response.12-16 Therefore, we designed present prospective study to evaluate safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of idarubicin-loaded DEM- TACE (DEMIDA-TACE) for the intermediate stage HCC patients. Patients and methods The study strictly followed the ethical guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration for biomedical re- search involving human subjects. Approval for the study was obtained from the Republic of Slovenia National Medical Ethics Committee on the 19th of March 2019, with the assigned approval number 0120-64/2019/5. Patient selection Between September 2019 and December 2021, 31 consecutive intermediate stage HCC patients who did not meet exclusion criteria and signed the in- formed consent were enrolled to this prospective single-institution study. Exclusion criteria includ- ed Child-Pugh liver cirrhosis > 8 points, portal vein thrombosis, iodine contrast agent allergy, left ven- tricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%, acute liver, kidney and/or cardiovascular failure, and women of childbearing age. The decisions for DEM-TACE and inclusion in the study were reached through weekly multidis- ciplinary tumour board (MTB) meetings at our institution. The MTB comprises experts in abdom- inal and interventional radiology, gastroenterol- ogy, hepatobiliary surgery, nuclear medicine, and oncology. The final day of the follow-up for the purpose of present study was December 31, 2023. Procedures All patients received prophylactic antibiotic treat- ment (i.e. 1000 mg of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid) and were scheduled for tumour biopsy in the same session as the first DEMIDA-TACE proce- dure. Patients were treated using a mixture of 2 mL LifePearlTM (Terumo Europe, Leuven, Belgium) drug-eluting microspheres of 100 µm in diam- eter loaded with 10 mg of 1 mg/mL idarubicin (Zavedos®, Pfizer, France). Superselective ap- Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(4): 517-526. Korsic S et al. / Idarubicin-loaded drug-eluting microspheres TACE in HCC patients 519 proach to treatment with ProgreatTM microcatheter (Terumo Europe, Leuven, Belgium) was used in all patients. Before initiating microspheres delivery, a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using Artis Zee floor with DynaCT (Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) was performed to verify the microcath- eter’s accurate positioning within the feeding ar- tery to ensure a complete coverage of the targeted lesions. For the visualization, a nonionic contrast agent (Ultravist 370®, Bayer HealthCare, Germany or Visipaque 320, GE Healthcare, Norway) was administered using a power injector (Avanta®, Medrad, Bayer HealthCare, Germany). In patients with multisegmental or bilobar disease, the position of the microcatheter was changed within the same session to ensure superselective delivery to each le- sion. The idarubicin-microspheres mixture delivery was slow (1 mL/min) and discontinued after com- plete dosage administration or at early stasis. Adverse events Safety was evaluated by clinical and laboratory monitoring. Adverse events were assessed ac- cording to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects v. 5.0 (CTCAE), AEs grade ≥ 3 were noted.17 Potential toxicity was assessed in the in- patient setting until the patient’s discharge, in the outpatient setting at 72 hours post-procedure, and again after 14 days, as well as with follow-up im- aging. Baseline and follow-up peripheral venous blood samples were obtained to assess liver en- zymes (alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], gamma-glutamyl trans- ferase [GGT]), complete blood count (CBC), dif- ferential blood count (DBC), coagulation tests, bili- rubin, albumin, kidney function (urea, creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]) and alpha fetoprotein (AFP). Before inclusion in the study, all patients under- went a cardiac ultrasound performed by an expe- rienced cardiologist to exclude individuals with a LVEF lower than 50%. For cardiotoxicity evalu- ation, LVEF was measured at baseline, 1 month after the first treatment, and 2 months after the completion of the first cycle of treatment. Response to treatment All patients underwent a baseline four-phase contrast enhanced CT 1 day before the treatment. Treatment response was evaluated based on fol- low-up contrast enhanced CT according to modi- fied Response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (mRECIST) by a randomly assigned experienced abdominal and/or interventional radiologists.18 The first follow-up CT for the evaluation of treat- ment response was scheduled 2 months after com- pleting the first cycle of treatment. Depending on the disease burden, the first treatment cycle con- sisted of 1, 2 or 3 procedures to ensure complete coverage of tumours before the first treatment response evaluation. An objective response (OR) to treatment was reported in patients achieving a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR). In cases of OR, follow-up CT was scheduled every 3 months the first year, after that, follow-up imag- ing was scheduled every 6 months or until progres- sion of disease (PD). Every patient achieving stable disease (SD) or PD was re-evaluated by the MTB for further treatment strategies. Pharmacokinetic study For the pharmacokinetic study, plasma levels of idarubicin and its major metabolite idarubicinol were measured at baseline (i.e. before the first pro- cedure) and at 5, 15, 30 minutes, 2, 6, 10, 24, and 72 hours after the first procedure. All samples were obtained from peripheral venous blood and were immediately centrifuged upon collection. After centrifugation, the plasma samples were extracted by tert-buthylmethyl ether with 10% isopropanol and then subjected to analysis by a high-perfor- mance liquid chromatograph Agilent 1290 Infinity II (Waldbronn, Germany), coupled to a hybrid tri- ple quadrupole/ion trap mass spectrometer Sciex 5500 Qtrap (Framingham, MA, USA). The method was validated in terms of selectivity, accuracy, pre- cision, recovery, relative matrix effect, stability, and sensitivity with the lower limit of quantitation at 0.025 ng/mL for both idarubicin and idarubi- cinol. The mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and mean time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) of idarubicin and idarubicinol were determined, moreover the mean area under the concentration curves from 0 to 72 hours (AUC0-72) was calculated using the trapezoidal method. Statistical analysis Categorical variables were expressed using fre- quencies and percentages. Continuous variables were expressed as the mean and standard devia- tion (SD), in case of skewed distributions, median and range were used. Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the first TACE procedure until Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(4): 517-526. Korsic S et al. / Idarubicin-loaded drug-eluting microspheres TACE in HCC patients520 tion of TACE after radiological and/or clinical pro- gression that prevented retreatment with TACE. Median PFS and TTUP were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Median follow-up was calculated from the day of the first TACE until either death or the end of the study using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method. Survival was calculated from the day of the first TACE until death, surviving patients were cen- sored at the end of the study. Survival curves were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. To assess potential associations between pharma- cokinetic parameters and response to treatment or other clinical outcomes, non-parametric Mann- Whitney U tests and logistic regression models were conducted, respectively. p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to evaluate the prognostic value of idarubicin/idarubicinol plasma concentrations and to identify optimal cut-off values. The statistical analyses were performed us- ing IBM® SPSS® Statistics Version 29.0.2.0. (International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, New York, USA) for macOS. Results Patients The baseline demographic, clinical, laboratory and imaging characteristic of 31 intermediate stage HCC patients who were enrolled to present study are summarized in Table 1. Most patients were male (90.3%). The mean patient age was 70.6 ± 6.7 years. Most patients (96.8%), except one, presented with cirrhotic liver, of them 67.7% of ethylic aetiology. The second most common cause of cirrhosis was non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Cirrhosis was classified as Child-Pugh A and B in 23 (76.7%) and 7 (23.3%) patients, respectively. Clinical signs of portal hypertension and ascites were observed in 21(67.7%) and 10 (32.3%) patients, respectively. Baseline median serum AFP was 5,3 kU/L (range: 1-4062.5). Sixteen (51.6%) patients presented with unilobar disease. The mean number of lesions per patient was 3.1 ± 2.1 and the mean diameter of larg- est lesion was 44.8 ± 22.9 mm. The mean baseline LVEF was 64.1 ± 8.7 %. Procedures Overall, 68 DEMIDA-TACE procedures were per- formed. Depending on the disease burden, patients TABLE 1. Baseline patient’s demographic, clinical, laboratory and imaging characteristics Sex, number of patients (%) Male/female 28 (90.3)/3 (9.7) Age, years Mean ± SD 70.6 ± 6.7 Cirrhosis, n. (%) Yes/No 30 (96.8)/1 (3.2) Cirrhosis aetiology, n. (%) Ethylic 21 (67.7) NASH 4 (12.9) Hemochromatosis 2 (6.5) HBV 1 (3,2) HCV 1 (3,2) Cryptogenic 1 (3,2) Portal hypertension, n. (%) Yes/No 21 (67.7)/10 (32.3) Ascites, n. (%) Yes/No 10 (32.3)/21(67.7) Laboratory characteristics GGT, median (range) [µkat/L] 1.72 (0.24–14.83) AST, mean ± SD [µkat/L] 0.80 ± 0.26 ALT, mean ± SD [µkat/L] 0.71 ± 0.39 Total bilirubin, mean ± SD [μmol/L] 25.03 ± 15.9 Albumin, mean ± SD [g/L] 40.90 ± 5.00 AFP, median (range) [kU/L] 5.3 (1–4062.5) Child-Pugh score (n = 30) Mean points ± SD 5.8 ± 1.0 Child-Pugh class (n = 30) A/B, n (%) 23 (76.7)/7 (23.3) Imaging characteristics Number of lesions, mean ± SD [mm] 3.1 ± 2.1 Diameter of largest lesion, mean ± SD [mm] 44.8 ± 23.0 Cumulative diameter of lesions, mean ± SD [mm] 75.7 ± 39.8 Unilobar disease, n (%) 16 (51.6) Bilobar disease, n (%) 15 (48.4) LVEF (%) Mean ± SD 64.1 ± 8.7 AFP = alpha fetoprotein; ALT = alanine aminotransferase; AST = aspartate aminotransferase; GGT = gamma-glutamyl transferase; HBV = hepatitis B virus; HCV = hepatitis C virus; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; NASH = non-alcoholic steatohepatitis initial progression, either after which patient re- mained a candidate for retreatment with TACE or underwent discontinuation of TACE from all causes (including death). Time to TACE untreat- able progression (TTUP) was defined as the time from the first TACE procedure until discontinua- Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(4): 517-526. Korsic S et al. / Idarubicin-loaded drug-eluting microspheres TACE in HCC patients 521 underwent 1 (3.2%), 2 (74.2%) or 3 (22.6%) proce- dures before the first efficacy evaluation. Adverse events Overall, AEs grade ≥ 3 were noted after 20 (29.4%) procedures in 13 (41.9%) patients. AE grade 3 el- evation of AST, GGT, ALT and bilirubin was ob- served in 7 (10.3%), 4 (5.9%), 4 (5.9%), and 3 (4.4%) procedures, respectively. While the laboratory changes observed were transient, they persisted up to 72 hours after the procedure. Notably, all but 1 patient, who presented with grade 3 elevation of GGT, returned to their pre-treatment laboratory status at 14 days follow-up after the first procedure. Grade 3 abdominal pain was noted in 7 (10.3%) of procedures. No grade ≥ 3 haematologic and car- diotoxicity was observed. Three (in 4.4% of all pro- cedures) major complications were noted: a pseu- doaneurysm formation at the puncture site, which was treated by endovascular embolization with coils; and an infection of necrotic target lesion with abscess formation, necessitating percutaneous drainage and antibiotic treatment in two patients. Postembolization syndrome (i.e. abdominal pain, fever, nausea, elevation (doubling of baseline val- ue) of liver enzymes, leucocytosis) was observed after 10 (14.7%) procedures. Response to treatment At the first follow-up imaging, an OR in target lesions was achieved in 29 patients (93.5%). An overall OR was achieved in 26 (83.9%) patients (Figure 1). Overall CR and PR were achieved in 9 (29% of all 31 patients) and 17 (54.8%) patients, respectively. Three patients achieved PR in target lesions, however overall TACE treatable PD due to development of new lesions. Two patients pre- sented with clinical and radiological (PD in target lesions as well as development of new lesions) TACE untreatable progression: first patient died 5.4 months after the first procedure due to progres- sion to macrovascular invasion of the middle he- patic vein and inferior vena cava; second patient with intrahepatic progression and decompensation of liver cirrhosis died 6.5 months after the first pro- cedure. During the follow-up, progression (or death) was observed in 30 (96.8%) patients. The median PFS was 10.5 months (95% CI: 6.8–14.3 months). Thirteen patients (43.3% of patients with progres- sion) underwent additional on-demand TACE treatment. Five (16.7%) patients received systemic therapy, while 8 (27%) received best supportive care. One (3.3%) patient underwent surgical resec- tion. During the follow-up, TACE untreatable pro- gression was observed in 18 (58,1%) patients. The median TTUP was 24.6 months (95% CI: 11.6–37.6 months). Survival During the median follow-up of 30 months (95% CI 29.0–31.0 months), 16 patients died. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 87% and 71%, respec- tively. Median OS was 36.0 months (95% CI 21.1– 50.9 months) (Figure 2). FIGURE 1. CT slices showing a mRECIST partial response to idarubicin-loaded drug-eluting microspheres (DEMIDA) - transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the VIII. segment of cirrhotic liver. (A) Baseline CT showing multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The diameter of the largest tumour was 38 mm; (B) Only minimally enhancing largest target lesion at the first treatment response evaluation, the diameter of viable lesion was 4 mm. A B Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(4): 517-526. Korsic S et al. / Idarubicin-loaded drug-eluting microspheres TACE in HCC patients522 Idarubicin pharmacokinetics The idarubicin and idarubicinol plasma concentra- tions within the initial 72-hour period following DEMIDA-TACE remained low, with the mean Cmax of 9.1 ± 5.0 ng/mL and 3.7 ± 1.6 ng/mL, respectively (Figure 3). The median Tmax for idarubicin was 5 min (range, 5–15 min), indicating rapid systemic absorption following hepatic intra-arterial admin- istration. In contrast, idarubicinol plasma concen- trations exhibited a slower increase, with a median Tmax of 10 hours (range, 2−24 hours). However, the mean AUC0-72 for idarubicinol was higher at 179.7 ± 81.4 ng/mL*h compared to idarubicin (mean AUC0-72 54.0 ± 25.8 ng/mL*h) over the same 72-hour period, indicating a greater overall exposure to the metab- olite rather than the parent drug. Patients achieving OR had significantly higher concentrations at 72 hours for both idarubicin and idarubicinol (p = 0.024 and 0.014, respectively), as well as their combined concentration (p = 0.014), compared to those with PD. The cut-off values for OR were identified at 1.2 ng/mL and 1.29 ng/mL for idarubicinol and combined idarubicin-idarubi- cinol plasma concentration, respectively (Figure 4). The sensitivity and specificity of both cut-off val- ues were 0.72 and 1, respectively. Median ida- rubicinol and combined idarubicin-idarubicinol plasma concentration at 72 hours were 1.62 ng/ mL (range, BLOQ–2.93 ng/mL) and 1.72 ng/mL (range, BLOQ–3.07 ng/mL), respectively. However, in terms of AUC0-72 for idarubicin, idarubicinol and their combined plasma concentration, no signifi- cant differences were observed between OR and PD groups. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in pharmacokinetic parameters between patients experiencing AEs grade ≥ 3 and those without such events. Discussion The present prospective study aimed to evaluate safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of DEMIDA- TACE for the intermediate stage HCC patients. The promising outcomes of present study suggest that this approach to treatment holds significant poten- tial in the management of HCC. To our knowledge, our study is the largest in terms of the study population treated with DEMIDA-TACE using LiferPearlTM microspheres. The mechanical and pharmacological properties of LiferPearlTM microspheres have been studied in vitro and compared with four commonly used microspheres (LifePearl, DC Bead, HepaSphere, and Tandem).19 The PARIS registry study enrolled 97 patients including 22 patients treated with ida- rubicin loaded DEM and 75 patients treated with doxorubicin loaded DEM.20 In our study population, AEs grade ≥ 3 were noted in 41.9% patients after 29.4% procedures, in- cluding postembolization syndrome observed af- ter 10 (14.7%) procedures. The PARIS registry us- ing LiferPearlTM microspheres loaded with either idarubicin or doxorubicin reported AEs grade ≥ 3 in 13.4% patients, mainly related to postembo- lization syndrome. Moreover, the PARIS registry Survival [months] 50.0040.0030.0020.0010.00.00 C um S ur vi va l 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Survival Function Censored Survival Function FIGURE 2. Kaplan-Meier curve for overall survival. 0.01 0.1 1 10 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 Pl as m a co nc en tra tio n [n g/ m L] Time [h] FIGURE 3. Geometric mean plasma concentration profiles for idarubicin (blue) and idarubicinol (purple) (n = 31). Error bars indicate first and third quartiles of plasma concentrations. Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(4): 517-526. Korsic S et al. / Idarubicin-loaded drug-eluting microspheres TACE in HCC patients 523 reported no AEs grade ≥ 3 laboratory changes ex- cept one transient hyperbilirubinemia. However, one patient with a history of heart insufficiency died from heart failure two days after DEMIDA- TACE performed with 4 mL of LifePearl™ loaded with 5 mg/mL of idarubicin, without postembo- lization syndrome.20 When administrated intra- venously, the main safety concern for idarubicin is dose-limiting cardio- and haematological tox- icity. No cardiotoxicity was noted in our study population, consistent with other research on DEMIDA-TACE.14,15,20,21 This can be explained by the cumulative cardiotoxic dose of idarubicin set at 93 mg/m2.22 Theoretically, a patient with an average body surface area of 1.8 m2 and normal LVEF can undergo 17 sessions of TACE using 10 mg of idarubicin before reaching this threshold. Furthermore, studies have shown that idarubicin- induced cardiomyopathy is uncommon with cu- mulative doses up to 290 mg/m2.14,22 No haemato- logical toxicity was observed in our study popula- tion. In a phase I dose-escalation trial study of 21 patients treated with TANDEM (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) microspheres, half of haematological grade 3 AEs observed were thrombocytopenia, which occurred in patients with a baseline platelet count < 75 000 per mmc.14 In a study of 72 patients by the same institution, grade 3–4 AEs after 52% of sessions, being pri- marily biological (such as elevation of AST, ALT, bilirubin, GGT, glucose, AP and lipase, in order of frequency), while clinical manifestations (such as abdominal pain, fatigue, fever and ascites) were observed to a lesser extent. Additionally, hepato- biliary complications were reported in 2 sessions, including gallbladder necrosis in one patient and multi-organ failure leading to death in another.22 It is noteworthy that in PARIS registry there were no significant differences in the rate of hepato- biliary toxicities between idarubicin (10/31, 9.7%) and doxorubicin (26/156, 16.7%; p = 0.58) groups. However, there was a trend towards less hepato- biliary toxicities in the idarubicin group, despite significantly lower number of patients with cir- rhosis, which has a protective role against hepa- tobiliary complications.20,23,24 Of 3 major complica- tions (4,4% of all procedures) in the present study, pseudoaneurysm at puncture site cannot be reli- ably attributed to the use of idarubicin. Four ma- jor complications have been reported out of 452 TACE (0.9%) in 144 patients, that were treated with DEMDOX-TACE at our institution between February 2010 and December 2018. An ischemic cerebrovascular insult to the cerebellum follow- ing a non-target embolization (the tumour feeding artery being the right internal mammary artery); a radial artery thrombosis following a trans radial approach; a variceal bleeding resulting from em- esis after the procedure; and an infection of the necrotic tumour, which resolved after antibiotic treatment.25 Those complications, as well as major complications in the present study, were not re- lated to the specific chemotherapeutic agent. The hepatic intraarterial administration of idarubicin- loaded drug-eluting microspheres allows maxi- mizing drug exposure in the targeted tumour while minimizing systemic exposure and poten- tial systemic toxicity, suggesting that DEMIDA- Response to treatment progressive disease (n=4)objective response (n=25) Id ar ub ic in ol p la sm a co nc en tra tio n [n g /m L] 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 .50 .00 Response to treatment progressive disease (n=4)objective response (n=25) C om bi ne d id ar ub ic in -id ar ub ic in ol p la sm a co nc en tra tio n [n g/ m L] 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 .00 FIGURE 4. Idarubicinol (A) and combined idarubicin-idarubicinol (B) plasma concentrations at 72 hours post-procedure in patients with objective response to treatment or progressive disease (n = 29). A B Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(4): 517-526. Korsic S et al. / Idarubicin-loaded drug-eluting microspheres TACE in HCC patients524 TACE holds significant potential for optimizing therapeutic outcomes while minimizing AE. The ORR of 83.9% within 2 months after first cycle of DEMIDA-TACE (including 29.5% CR) in our study is in line with the best previously re- ported OR rate for LifePearlTM microspheres rang- ing between 76% and 90.9%.26-30 The reported OR at the first follow-up imaging in our group of pa- tients treated with DEMDOX-TACE was 91.0%. Additionally, CR rate achieved in those patients was higher than in our idarubicin group, 55.0% vs. 29.5%, respectively.25 PARIS registry reported an 81% ORR in target lesions and 72.9% overall ORR.20 The best reported ORR by Guiu et al. was 65% (61% after the first session, 64% after the sec- ond, 61% after the third, 50% after the forth ses- sion).22 High ORR observed in patients treated at our institution, using doxorubicin or idarubicin, are likely attributable to the regular superselective approach using microcatheter and repeated CBCT for depicting lesions and feeding arteries within the same session. While this approach prolongs procedures, it also ensures superselective deliv- ery to each target lesion, likely resulting in higher OR.25,31 Our reported median OS of 36.0 months (95% CI 21.1–50.9 months) is in line with the reported medi- an OS in patients treated with TACE, which ranges from less than 20 months in real life cohorts, up to 45 months in well-selected patients.32 According to the BCLC 2022 update, the expected survival of pa- tients treated with TACE is more than 30 months.4 The reported median OS in our DEMDOX-TACE group was 25.8 months. The 1- and 2-year survival rates in those patients were 85% and 53%, respec- tively, whereas in our idarubicin group, 1- and 2-year survival rates were 87% and 71%, respec- tively.25 Today, the reported OS results not only from DEM-TACE, but also from additional and sub- sequent treatment strategies, including systemic therapies that have highly improved during the past years namely due to the combined immune- and VEGF inhibitors therapy. PFS and TTUP were introduced as secondary endpoints, as they serve as a surrogate marker of OS to minimize the im- pact of other treatment strategies.3,33,34 The median PFS and median TTUP of 10.5 months and 24.6 months, respectively, are the longest reported in patients treated with DEMIDA-TACE. The PARIS registry reported median PFS of 10.4 and 15.7 months in their idarubicin and doxorubicin group, respectively, with a shorter median PFS in the ida- rubicin group being explained by the larger size of treated tumours in this group.20 In our DEMDOX- TACE experience, the reported median PFS was 10.2 months, comparable with the present idaru- bicin group.25 Guiu et al. reported median PFS of 6.6 months in their IDASPHERE II trial and time to treatment failure (time until TACE discontinu- ation due to any reason, including death) of 14.4 months in patients treated with idarubicin-loaded TANDEM beads (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts).15,21 The plasma concentrations of both idarubicin and idarubicinol within the 72-hour post DEM- TACE remained low, demonstrating the ability of DEM to release idarubicin in a sustained manner. The median Tmax of 5 minutes suggests that ida- rubicin reaches its maximum systemic concen- tration relatively quickly after hepatic intraarte- rial administration, consistent with the results of IDASPHERE phase 1 trial, thus demonstrating an initial moderate burst release. In contrast, plasma concentrations of idarubicinol increased slowly; with a median Tmax of 10 hours even slower than with DC BeadTM (Biocompatibles, Surrey, UK) mi- crospheres, for which Boulin et al. reported a me- dian Tmax of 6 hours (range 2−6 hours). However, the mean AUC0-72 results of 54.0 ± 25.8 ng/mL*h and 179.7 ± 81.4 ng/mL*h, for idarubicin and idarubi- cinol, respectively) are closer to those of the 15 mg dose study group from IDASPHERE I, for which values of mean AUC0-72 were reported as 146.8 ± 134.9 ng/mL*h and 256.0 ± 79.9 ng/mL*h, respec- tively. This may be attributable to various factors: a higher lower limit of quantification in IDASPHERE study (1 ng/mL vs. 0.025 ng/mL) as well as use of different brand and sizes of microspheres (DC BeadTM of 300–500 µm vs. LifePearl 100 µm), as in- deed for the same volume of microspheres, smaller microspheres size have a larger number of micro- spheres resulting in more contact surface likely re- sulting in faster and higher elution.14 The higher mean AUC0-72 for idarubicinol com- pared to idarubicin indicates a greater overall expo- sure to the metabolite rather than the parent drug. The significant difference observed in idarubicin, idarubicinol, and their combined plasma concen- trations at 72 hours between patients achieving OR and those with PD suggests that pharmacokinetics may serve as predictive factor for treatment out- comes. In patients with idarubicinol and combined idarubicin-idarubicinol plasma concentrations at 72 hours post-procedure above the defined cut-off values (1.2 and 1.29 ng/mL, respectively), achiev- ing OR to treatment is associated with a 0.72 sen- sitivity and 1.0 specificity. Further investigations Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(4): 517-526. Korsic S et al. / Idarubicin-loaded drug-eluting microspheres TACE in HCC patients 525 with larger sample sizes are warranted to confirm these findings. Limitations of present study include a single in- stitution setting with a small study population and no control group treated with DEMDOX-TACE. However, the results of present study were com- pared to those of our previously published retro- spective study involving 144 consecutive patients treated with DEMDOX-TACE at our institution.25 In conclusion, our study demonstrates promis- ing results regarding the safety, efficacy, and phar- macokinetics of DEMIDA-TACE in intermediate stage HCC patients. LifepearlTM microspheres effi- cient delivery of idarubicin to the targeted lesions resulting in minimal systemic toxicity, a high ORR, prolonged PFS and TTUP, and favourable OS, sup- port the use of idarubicin as a viable alternative to doxorubicin in DEM-TACE. Further multicentric randomized trials are warranted to objectively as- sess the potential superiority of idarubicin over doxorubicin and other commonly used anticancer drugs in this setting. Idarubicinol and combined idarubicin-idarubi- cinol plasma concentrations at 72 hours post-pro- cedure may serve as prognostic factors for achiev- ing OR. Refrences 1. Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Laversanne M, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, et al. Global Cancer Observatory: cancer today. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2024. [cited 2024 Feb 1]. Available at: https://gco.iarc.who.int/today 2. Vogel A, Meyer T, Sapisochin G, Salem R, Saborowski A. Hepatocellular car- cinoma. Lancet 2022; 400: 1345-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01200-4 3. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2018; 69: 182-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019 4. Reig M, Forner A, Rimola J, Ferrer-Fàbrega J, Burrel M, Garcia-Criado Á, et al. BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update. J Hepatol 2022; 76: 681-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.018 5. Ducreux M, Abou-Alfa GK, Bekaii-Saab T, Berlin J, Cervantes A, de Baere T, et al. The management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Current expert opinion and recommendations derived from the 24th ESMO/World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, Barcelona, 2022. ESMO Open 2023; 8: 101567. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101567 6. Raoul JL, Forner A, Bolondi L, Cheung TT, Kloeckner R, de Baere T. Updated use of TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: How and when to use it based on clinical evidence. Cancer Treat Rev 2019; 72: 28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.11.002 7. Varela M, Real MI, Burrel M, Forner A, Sala M, Brunet M, et al. Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with drug eluting beads: efficacy and doxorubicin pharmacokinetics. J Hepatol 2007; 46: 474-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.10.020 8. Lammer J, Malagari K, Vogl T, Pilleul F, Denys A, Watkinon A, et al. Prospective randomized study of doxorubicin-eluting-bead embolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: results of the PRECISION V study. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 2010; 33: 41-52. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009- 9711-7 9. Boulin M, Guiu S, Chauffert B, Delhom E, Schmitt A, Hillon P, et al. Screening of anticancer drugs for chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Anticancer Drugs 2011; 22: 741-8. doi: 10.1111/apt.12746 10. Robert J. Clinical pharmacokinetics of idarubicin. Clin Pharmacokinet 1993; 24: 275-88. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199324040-00002 11. Guiu B, Hincapie G, Thompson L, Wu Y, Boulin M, Cassinotto C, et al. An in vitro evaluation of four types of drug-eluting embolics joaded with idaru- bicin. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019: 30: 1303-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.12.022 12. Favelier S, Boulin M, Hamza S, Cercueil JP, Cherblanc V, Lepage C, et al. Lipiodol trans-arterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with idarubicin: First experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013; 36: 1039-46. doi: 10.1007/s00270-012-0532-8 13. Guiu B, Schmitt A, Reinhardt S, Deltenre P, Denys A, Lepida A, et al. Idarubicin-loaded ONCOZENE drug-eluting embolic agents for chemoem- bolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: in vitro loading and release and in vivo pharmacokinetics. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26: 262-70. doi: 10.1016/j. jvir.2014.08.021 14. Boulin M, Hillon P, Cercueil JP, Raoul JL, Lepage C, Barbare JC, et al. Idarubicin-loaded beads for chemoembolisation of hepatocellular carci- noma: results of the IDASPHERE phase I trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014; 39: 1301-13. doi: 10.1111/apt.12776 15. Guiu B, Chevallier P, Assenat E, Barbier E, Merle P, Bouvier A, et al. Idarubicin-loaded beads for chemoembolization of hepatocellular carci- noma: the IDASPHERE II single-arm phase II trial 2019; 291: 801-8. doi: 0.1148/radiol.2019182399 16. Guiu B, Jouve JL, Schmitt A, Minello A, Bonnetain F, Cassinotto C, et al. Intra-arterial idarubicin_lipiodol without embolisation in hepatocellular car- cinoma: the LIDA-B phase I trial. J Hepatol 2018; 68: 1163-71. doi: 10.1016/j. jhep.2018.01.022. 17. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 5.0 [internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 3]. Available at: https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/ electronic_applications/docs/ctcae_v5_quick_reference_5x7.pdf 18. Lencioni R, Llovet J. Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocel- lular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 2010; 30: 52-60. doi: 10.1055/s-0030- 1247132 19. Guiu B, Hincapie G, Thompson L, Wu Y, Boulin M, Cassinotto C, et al. An in vitro evaluation of four types of drug-eluting embolics loaded with idaru- bicin. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30: 1303-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.12.022. 20. de Baere T, Guiu B, Ronot M, Chevallier P, Sergent G, Tancredi I, et al. Real life prospective evaluation of new drug-eluting platform for chemoemboliza- tion of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: PARIS registry. Cancers 2020; 12: 3405. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113405 21. Guiu B, Colombat S, Piron L, Hermida M, Allimant C, Pierredon-Foulongne MA, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with idarubicin-loaded tandem drug-eluting embolics. Cancers 2019; 11: 987. doi: 10.3390/cancers11070987 22. Anderlini P, Benjamin RS, Wong FC, Kantarjian HM, Andreeff M, Kornblau SM, et al. Idarubicin cardiotoxicity: a retrospective study in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplasia. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 2827-34. doi: 10.1200/ JCO.1995.13.11.2827 23. Guiu B, Deschamps F, Aho S, Munck F, Dromain C, Boige V, et al. Liver/biliary injuries following chemoembolisation of endocrine tumours and hepatocel- lular carcinoma: Lipiodol vs. drug-eluting beads. J Hepatol 2012; 56: 609-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.09.012 24. Shi Z, Wang D, Jiang H, Kang T, Yi R, Cui L. Comparison of CalliSpheres® mi- crospheres drug-eluting beads and conventional transarterial chemoembo- lization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a randomized controlled trial. Radiol Oncol 2023; 57: 70-9. doi: 10.2478/raon-2023-0001 25. Korsic S, Levasic N, Dezman R, Zupan LAL, Trotovsek B, Jansa R, et al. Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting microspheres chemoembolization under cone beam computed tomography control in patients with early and intermedi- ate stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiol Oncol 2022; 56: 311-8. doi: 10.2478/raon-2022-0019 26. Gomes FV, Oliveira JA, Correia MT, Costa NV, Abrantes J, Torres D, et al. Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with drug-eluting polyeth- ylene glycol embolic agents: single-center retrospective analysis in 302 pa- tients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29: 841-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.02.004 Radiol Oncol 2024; 58(4): 517-526. Korsic S et al. / Idarubicin-loaded drug-eluting microspheres TACE in HCC patients526 27. Lucatelli P, Ginnani Corradini L, De Rubeis G, Corona M, Saba L, Catalano C, et al. Balloon-occluded transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (b- TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma performed with polyethylene-glycol epirubicin-loaded drug-eluting embolics: safety and preliminary results. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2019; 42: 853-62. doi: 10.1007/s00270-019- 02192-y 28. Aliberti C, Carandina R, Sarti D, Mulazzani L, Pizzirani E, Guadagni S, et al. Chemoembolization adopting polyethylene glycol drug-eluting embolics loaded with doxorubicin for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017; 209: 430-4. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17477 29. Fiorentini G, Sarti D, Carandina R, Mincarelli C, Candelari R, Argirò R, et al. A review discussing the use of polyethylene glycol microspheres in the treat- ment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Future Oncol 2019; 15: 695-703. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0425 30. Veloso Gomes F, de Baère T, Verset G, Coimbra É, Tovar-Felice G, Malagari K, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization with anthracyclines-loaded poly- ethylene glycol drug eluting microspheres for the treatment of hepatocel- lular carcinoma: a pooled multicentric analysis of survival in 580 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2023; 46: 436-46. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023- 03362-9 31. Popovic P, Stabuc B, Jansa R, Garbajs M. Survival of patients with intermedi- ate stage hepatocellular carcinoma treated with superselective transarte- rial chemoembolization using doxorubicin-loaded DC Bead under cone- beam computed tomography control. Radiol Oncol 2016; 50: 418-26. doi: 10.1515/raon-2015-0045 32. Vogel A, Cervantes A, Chau I, Daniele B, Llovet JM, Meyer T, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2018; 29: iv238-55. doi: 10.1093/ annonc/mdy308 33. Bruix J, Reig M, Rimola J, Vilana R, Burrel M, Llovet JM, et al. Clinical decision making and research in hepatocellular carcinoma: pivotal role of imaging techniques. Hepatology 2011; 54: 2238-44. doi: 10.1002/hep.24670 34. Wang H, Li B, Wang Y, Zhang J, Wu Y, Fan W, Li J. Time to untreatable progres- sion is an appropriate surrogate endpoint for overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization. J Cancer Res Ther 2020; 16: 301-8. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_898_19