137 Key words: Biodiversity, data collection, Mahavir Swami Wildlife Sanctuary, DBH Height. Ključne besede: biodiverziteta, zbiranje podatkov, Zavetišče za divje živali Mahavir Swami, prsni premer, višina. Corresponding author: Pavan Kumar E-mail: pawan2607@gmail.com Received: 2. 2. 2023 Accepted: 13. 6. 2024 Data Collection Survey on Forest Conservation in Mahavir Swami Wildlife Sanctuary for Addressing Climate Change Abstract Tropical forest serves as an important pivotal role in terrestrial biological diversity. The Data Collection Survey on Forest Conservation aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current state of forests and evaluate the effectiveness of conservation efforts. This survey integrates advanced data collection methods, including remote sensing and Geographic Information Systems (GIS), to monitor forest health, biodiversity, and threats. This study makes an attempt to data collection surveying methods to assess forest management in Mahavir Swami Wildlife Sanctuary (MSWS), Lalitpur, UP, India, using Sentinel-2A sensor data. We selected tree samples from thirty transects in MSWS through random sampling. A method of collecting tree measurement factors based on height and DBH with a variety of high-precision methods is proposed. The data collection survey used in this study can help forest managers, environmentalist, and conservationist for formulating policies for management of forest ecosystem at various scales. Izvleček Tropski gozd ima na kopnem pomembno vlogo v biotski pestrosti. Namen zbiranja podatkov ohranjenosti gozdov je zagotoviti celovito analizo trenutnega stanja gozdov in oceniti učinkovitost prizadevanj za njihovo ohranjanje. V raziskavi smo za spremljanje zdravja gozdov, biotske raznovrstnosti in njihove ogroženosti združili napredne metode zbiranja podatkov, vključno z daljinskim zaznavanjem in geo- grafskimi informacijskimi sistemi (GIS). V raziskavi smo poskušali zbrati podatke geodetskih metod z uporabo podatkov senzorja Sentinel-2A in oceniti gospodar- jenje z gozdovi v rezervatu za divje živali Mahavir Swami (MSWS), Lalitpur, UP, Indija. Z naključnim vzorčenjem smo izbrali vzorce dreves iz tridesetih transektov v MSWS. Predlagamo metodo zbiranja meritev drevesnih lastnosti na podlagi višine in DBH z različnimi, visoko natančnimi metodami. Analiza o zbiranju podatkov, uporabljena v tej študiji, lahko pomaga vsem, ki gospodarijo z gozdovi in okoljevarstvenikom ter naravovarstvenikom pri oblikovanju politik za upravljanje gozdnih ekosistemov na različnih ravneh. Pankaj Lavania1, Garima Gupta1, Pavan Kumar2, K. K. Singh3, Prabhat Tiwari1, Manmohan Dobriyal4, A. K. Pandey5 & Manish Srivastav4 1 Department of Silviculture & Agroforestry, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi, India. 2 Department of Forest Biology & Tree Improvement, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi, India. 3 Addl PCCF, Forest Department, Uttar Pradesh, India. 4 College of Horticulture and Forestry, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi, India. 5 College of Horticulture, Central Agricultural University, Bermiok, Sikkim, India. DOI: 10.3986/hacq-2025-000124/1 • 2025, 137–144 24/1 • 2025, 137–144 138 Pavan Kumar Data Collection Survey on Forest Conservation in Mahavir Swami Wildlife Sanctuary for Addressing Climate Change Introduction Forests play important roles for humans and the environ- ment. The conservation of forests is an important global imperative, given the myriad environmental, social, and economic benefits that forests provide. From serving as vital carbon sinks and biodiversity reservoirs to offering livelihoods for millions, the health of forest ecosystems is intricately linked to the well-being of our planet and its inhabitants. However, forests face unprecedented threat from deforestation, illegal logging, climate change, and unsustainable land use practices. These challenges require comprehensive and systematic data collection to inform effective conservation strategies. Information on forest sta- tus is seamlessly useful for sustainable forest management. Forests, especially tropical forests, are being the main car- bon sinks and play a vital role in climate change analysis. Deforestation is responsible for about 10% of total global warming (Achard et al., 2002). The assessments of forest traits using allometric equations have gain momentum among ecologists. Natural variations can be found in the appearance and structure of plants. As plants grow, differ- ent forms of plants emerge. Monitoring and analyzing of forests has become easier with the development of remote sensing data with fine resolutions. Crown, volume, mor- phology and biomass of trees can be effectively identified and measured using satellite imagery (Barret, 2014; Bar- rett & Christensen, 2011; Kumar et al., 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018a, 2018b, 2022; Singh et al., 2021). It has made it possible to identify and measure the crown dimension, volume, morphology and biomass of individual trees from satellite imagery (Popescu et al., 2003). Advances in the field of the optical remote sensing has made the assess- ing and monitoring of changes in forest cover easier. There are various applications of remote sensing for monitoring the earth’s surface, forest changes and the greenness level of vegetation cover. With the advances in remote sensing technology, the tedious process of collecting data through field survey, which requires a lot of time, labor and huge costs, has been simplified as the required data can be col- lected by establishing a clear relationship between the field measurements and spectral data. The concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is very low (0.03%). However, this meager amount can play an important role for living organisms on Earth (Beets et al., 2014; Berg & Lindholm, 2005; Blaschke, 2010; Boudreau et al., 2008). This gas is converted into carbohydrates by plants during the process of photosyn- thesis. The carbon is released into the atmosphere after the plants die. Forest ecosystems are the driving force of the carbon sink due to their age, ecological conditions and possible disturbance. The carbon emission into the atmosphere is the main cause of global warming, which was duly considered in the Kyoto Protocol of the 1997 Earth Summit (Oberthür Ott, 1999). Later, it has at- tracted the attention of the scientific community to stop the rising carbon dioxide concentration from forests in the global carbon cycle. Thus, biomass has been consid- ered a significant variable for assessing the environmental implications, climate change and food security (Otukei & Emanuel, 2015). Both below- and above-ground biomass are used to estimate carbon stock. Therefore, monitoring above-ground biomass (AGB) is essential for forest carbon at different spatial scales (Mitchard et al., 2011). However, assessment of biomass is a major challenge, especially in areas characterized by complex forest structures. In areas affected by deforestation and forest degradation, there is therefore little information on carbon estimates. If carbon is not sequestered form the atmosphere and stored in soils, forests and oceans, the rate of heating the earth surface global warming would increase rapidly. The sequestration of carbon from the atmosphere helps to balance carbon dioxide levels and maintain the carbon cycle. On the contrary anthropogenic activities, especially land use change and the burning of fossil fuels, have significantly disturbed the balance. Various researchers have estimated AGB in different forest ecosystems using allometric regression equations as a function of morphological traits (Brown et al., 1989; Glenn et al., 2008; Chave et al., 2005; Hossain et al., 2016; Segura & Kanninen, 2005; Vashum & Jayakumar, 2012). Quantification of forest biomass and estimation of carbon stocks are of great importance for forest man- agement. Mapping the spatial pattern of forest biomass can help in assessing the carbon stock within a region for scientific management of the forest (Vargas-Larreta et al., 2017). Kumar et al. (2018) analyzed the suitability of allomet- ric models to assess plant morphology using parameters such as diameter, height and stem volume of Anogeissus pendula Edgew. The suitability of allometric models for analyzing morphological traits and predicting the vol- ume of an individual tree was investigated. The allomet- ric relationship between volume and different degrees of stem’s diameter and height was determined using linear, logarithmic, quadratic and cubic equations. The regres- sion analysis revealed that the product of diameter and height [(D]^(2) H) in the linear regression equation has a strong relationship with tree volume (R2=0.9996). The linear regression equation model proved to be a useful model for analyzing morphological traits and predicting stem volume using the product of diameter and height [(D]^(2) H). In their work, Clerici et al. (2016) calcu- lated the biomass and carbon stock in the Andean forest. 24/1 • 2025, 137–144 139 Pavan Kumar Data Collection Survey on Forest Conservation in Mahavir Swami Wildlife Sanctuary for Addressing Climate Change Field measurements, GeoEye-I and Pleiades-1A images were used to estimate above-ground biomass and total carbon stock. Six vegetation indices, namely ratio vegeta- tion index (RVI), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), normalized difference greenness index (NDGI), vegetation index number (VIN) and transformed vegeta- tion index (TVI) were used to estimate the carbon stock and biomass of the forest. Log-log, linear and semi log models were used to determine the appropriate indices for biomass estimation. They found that the applied methodology is suitable for accurate AGB estimation in a small region. Previous work on carbon assessment is based on elementary statistical studies and is less precise. Multi- temporal and spatial satellite databases with improved analytical algorithms have led to a reliable assessment of carbon and land use. Assessing the biomass of tree spe- cies is important to determine the structural aspect and conditions for their growth. The sustainability of forests also depends on the estimation of biomass. Therefore, al- lometric equations that consider morphological traits of forest species (tree height, crown diameter and DBH) are constructive in estimating forest biomass (Kebede & Soromessa, 2018). In this study, an attempt is made to collect data collection methods to assess forest manage- ment in Mahavir Swami Wildlife Sanctuary (MSWS), Lalitpur, UP, India using Sentinel-2A sensor data. Figure 1: Location map of study area. Slika 1: Lokacija preučevanega območja 24/1 • 2025, 137–144 140 Pavan Kumar Data Collection Survey on Forest Conservation in Mahavir Swami Wildlife Sanctuary for Addressing Climate Change Study Area The Mahavir Swami Wildlife Sanctuary (MSWS) in Lal- itpur is located in the state of Uttar Pradesh. Its latitudi- nal and longitudinal extent is 24°29’ N to 24°32’ N and 78°14’ E to 78°17’ E (Figure 1) and is situated at an eleva- tion of 300 feet above the Betwa river, near the Vindyan Range. It is 125 km away from Jhansi. It spreads over an area of 5.4 km2. The annual dry months can range from 3 mm to 7 mm. Summer temperatures range from 27°C to 45°C and can exceed 49°C and winter temperatures range from 6°C to 26°C. The Sanctuary is less known for its wildlife, but it is an important site for the critically endangered vulture species and focuses on their popula- tions and conservation strategy. It is an important breed- ing site for the Long-billed vultures (Gyps indicus) and has been reularly monitored since 2007. The high cliffs are an ideal habitat for the vultures, owls, eagles and other bird species. The forest is comprised of Sagwan (Tectona gran- dis) butother tree species like Arjun (Terminalia arjuna), Tendu (Diospyros melanoxylon), Gunja (Abrus precatorius) etc., are also found. Selection of samples and plot layout design Dimension of samples and unpredictability in species affect the accuracy of their estimation. Population is di- vided into homogenous groups and samples are selected randomly from such group independently for reducing sampling discrepancy (Chako, 1965). Effectiveness of stratification can be assessed through variance analysis. Stratified random sampling technique was utilized for collecting samples from the homogeneous groups having high normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) val- ues. Size of the sample was determined as: Where: N = Number of samples needed t = Student’s ‘t’ at a given level of probability (2 for 95% confidence limit) e = Desired sampling error expressed as % of mean CV = co-efficient of variation (%) The total required samples were determined to be 37 assuming that E% is equal to 10%. Four samples were located in inaccessible areas. Hence, 32 samples were col- lected from the study area. Topographic sheet on a scale of 1 : 50,000 were used for preparing base map and design- ing plot. For this, the topographic map was divided into number of grids of 2½’ × 2½’. Four sub grids of 1¼’ × 1¼’ size were made within each such grid of topographic map. Sufficient care is taken in laying of plots. The aspect of all the plots should be the same. The plot should be laid in a frame of 31.62*31.62 meter on one side of the stream avoiding any stream. Uniform direction either left or right should be followed throughout the plots. All the materials should be kept outside the plot to avoid tram- pling of the flora. A square plot of 0.1 ha was selected from grid center in two sub grids randomly selected from each grid. Within each quadrant, girth at breast height (1.37 m above ground) was measured and using measur- ing tape. All the measurements like tree height, DBH and branch length were properly recorded in the individual field performa prepared before field work. Similarly, the mean stand height was obtained by measuring the indi- vidual height of various trees in each quadrant using Hyp- someter. The field work was carried out in the month of July, 2021. Figure 2: Plot layout design. Slika 2: Zasnova postavitve raziskovalne ploskve. 24/1 • 2025, 137–144 141 Pavan Kumar Data Collection Survey on Forest Conservation in Mahavir Swami Wildlife Sanctuary for Addressing Climate Change Data assembly and basal area The basal area/genera and species/hectare were analyzed for each plot. Diversity indices of all the sampled spe- cies in STR were calculated and their significance was de- termined using the analysis of variance (ANOVA). Basal area (BA) was calculated as: A=πr2 Where: BA = Basal area of the tree (m2) r = Radius (cm) Tree species were collected from each sampled transect plot. For each species total numbers of individual species were determined. Natural log of species was calculated us- ing total number of individual species. Mean number of genera/ha was calculated from total no. of species. Segmentation forest and non-forest area Masking of non-forest areas (built up areas, agriculture, plantations and water bodies) is essential before field sampling. This is done by detecting pixels of small near infrared radiances than in the visible radiances (Blaschke, 2010). The near infrared band is sensitive to illumination variation and responds well to vegetation (Kumar, 2013). The near infrared and visible channels were normalized by non-vegetation comparison. Of the delineated tree crowns, 70% crowns were used as training sets and the 30% for data validation. A knowledge base was built for making class hierarchy (Baatz, 2004). The dominant spe- cies were separated using reflectance curve in the study area. Texture analysis (3*3 window) in ERDAS Imagine (version 2014) was used for smoothening of multispectral imagery. The tree crown edges were demarcated by zoom- ing in at a scale of 1 : 250. The pan sharpened images al- low a fine visual interpretation of overlapped tree crowns. Green, white and blue colors in the filtered image show the non-forest areas. Healthy vegetation types can also be identified in the smoothed image. Global Moran’s index of autocorrelation sampling The geostatistics (spatial statistics) tool was used for auto- correlation sampling. It determines the degree to which the spatial features are either clustered or dispersed in space. This tool in ESRI’s ARC/INFO (v.10.2) software contains various indices like Moran’s I index, variance, Z- score and p-value (Figure 3). The positive and negative Moran’s I values represent cluster of data and disperse pat- terns respectively. The p-value is calculated from the Z- score and determines the statistical significance between the data sets and the acceptance/rejection of the null hy- pothesis (). Here, refers that the trees in the study area are randomly distributed. Figure 3: Output of Global Moran’s I. Slika 3: Rezultat Global Moran’s I. Allometric analysis The graphical exploration of the data enables to get an idea about the suitable type of model to be used and to analyze the relationship between the variables. Allometric equations were developed for data fitting of the sample trees. Thirty representative tree-groups (Table 1) of six major types of tree species in MSWS consist of Sagwan (Tectona grandis) and other tree species like Arjun (Ter- minalia arjuna), Tendu (Diospyros melanoxylon), Gunja (Abrus precatorius The field work was carried out in July 2021, as the canopy was completely closed at the beginning of the monsoon for the measurement of plant morphology. Five mean values were randomly taken from each type of tree species. Table 1 shows the description of the sample tree species. 24/1 • 2025, 137–144 142 Pavan Kumar Data Collection Survey on Forest Conservation in Mahavir Swami Wildlife Sanctuary for Addressing Climate Change Tree No. (m) (m) (cm3) NDVI 1 0.21021 7.0104 337320.8 0.401 2 0.2183 7.3152 585221.9 0.333 3 0.22638 6.4008 687294.9 0.314 4 0.26681 6.096 452061.3 0.324 5 0.25872 7.62 486964.5 0.345 6 0.39779 4.572 581750.2 0.355 7 0.4463 4.8768 593550.4 0.364 8 0.30076 4.572 603916.1 0.348 9 0.32017 5.1816 643651.8 0.365 10 0.17787 9.4488 661400.3 0.365 11 0.18596 9.7536 671479.8 0.379 12 0.20213 10.0584 696268.8 0.381 13 0.2501 10.9728 719971.6 0.388 14 0.2838 10.3632 798965.9 0.385 15 0.254 10.668 896763.6 0.392 Source: Based on filed survey, 2021. Table 1: Description of sample trees species: Tree height; stem diameter at a height of; stem diameter at 1.3 m height (DBH); stem volume. Tabela 1: Opis vzorčenih dreves: višina drevesa; premer debla na višini; premer stebla na višini 1,3 m (DBH); prostornina debla. Tree No. (m) (m) (cm3) NDVI 16 0.18596 9.7536 938555.9 0.389 17 0.20213 10.0584 977464.2 0.399 18 0.21021 10.9728 1007197 0.401 19 0.2183 10.3632 1041474 0.415 20 0.22638 10.668 1035246 0.418 21 0.26681 9.7536 1177554 0.441 22 0.25872 11.2776 1233747 0.465 23 0.27489 11.5824 1283568 0.475 24 0.28298 10.0584 1274948 0.469 25 0.25872 9.4488 1365358 0.457 26 0.18596 9.7536 1453835 0.478 27 0.25872 11.2776 1444289 0.498 28 0.27489 11.5824 1589435 0.512 29 0.28298 10.0584 1794537 0.524 30 0.25872 9.4488 2398411 0.621 Figure 4: Relationship among various morpho- logical traits. Slika 4: Korelacija med različnimi morfološkimi znaki. 24/1 • 2025, 137–144 143 Pavan Kumar Data Collection Survey on Forest Conservation in Mahavir Swami Wildlife Sanctuary for Addressing Climate Change Relationship between ecological indices and morphological trails Allometry in forestry as a statistical relationship between the dimensions of trees and their other properties is a use- ful tool to obtain information about the species in rela- tion to the forest (Figure 4). With the advances in remote sensing technology, the tedious process of data collection through field surveys, which consumes time, labour and huge costs, has been simplified as remote sensing technology allows the re- quired data to be collected by establishing explicit rela- tionship between the field measurements and the spectral data. Various morphological traits such as the like num- ber of trees, tree height, diameter at breast height, stem volume and height, and the ecological index NDVI were recorded during the field sampling to analyse the relation- ship between them (Figure 5). Figure 5: 3D surface plot of NDVI against height and DBH. Slika 5: 3D površinski grafikon NDVI, višine dreves in prsnega premera (DBH). Conclusion The findings indicate that mixed-species diversity con- tributes more to diversity in MSWS than that of mono- culture plantations. The present study makes an attempt to identify the species concentration among tree diver- sity in MSWS. This survey also provides a comprehen- sive overview of the current forest conservation landscape and identifies critical areas for improvement. The findings and recommendations of this study will serve as a founda- tion for policymakers, conservationists and stakeholders working to preserve our forests for future generations. By addressing the identified challenges and building on the successes, we can ensure a sustainable and resilient forest ecosystem. Funding This research did not receive any specific grant from fund- ing agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors ORCID iD Pavan Kumar  https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3653-8163 References Achard, F., Eva, H.D., Stibig, H.J., Mayaux, P., Gallego, J., Richards, T., & Malingreau, J.P. (2002). Determination of deforestation rates of the world’s humid tropical forests. Science, 297(5583), 999–1002. Baatz, M., Benz, U., Dehghani, S., Heynen, M., Höltje, A., Hofmann, P., Lingenfelder, I., Mimler, M., Sohlbach, M., Weber, M., & Willhauck, G. (2004). eCognition user guide. Definiens Imaging GmbH, Munich, Germany. Barrett, T. (2014). Storage and flux of carbon in live trees, snags, and logs in the Chugach and Tongass National Forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-889. Portland, OR: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 44 p., 889. Barrett, T. M., & Christensen, G. A. (2011). Forests of Southeast and South-Central Alaska, 2004–2008: Five-year forest inventory and analysis report. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-835. Portland, OR: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 156 p., 835. Beets, P.N., Kimberley, M.O., Oliver, G.R., & Pearce, S.H. (2014). The application of stem analysis methods to estimate carbon sequestration in arboreal shrubs from a single measurement of field plots. Forests, 5(5), 919–935. Berg, S., & Lindholm, E.L. (2005). Energy use and environmental impacts of forest operations in Sweden. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(1), 33–42. Blaschke, T. (2010). Object based image analysis for remote sens- ing. ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing, 65(1), 2–16. Blaschke, T. (2010). Object based image analysis for remote sens- ing. ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing, 65(1), 2–16. Boudreau, J., Nelson, R. F., Margolis, H. A., Beaudoin, A., Guindon, L., & Kimes, D. S. (2008). Regional aboveground forest biomass using airborne and spaceborne LiDAR in Québec. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(10), 3876–3890. Brown, S., Gillespie, A.J., & Lugo, A.E. (1989). Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. Forest science, 35(4), 881–902. 24/1 • 2025, 137–144 144 Pavan Kumar Data Collection Survey on Forest Conservation in Mahavir Swami Wildlife Sanctuary for Addressing Climate Change Chako, V.K. (1965). A Manual of Sampling Technology for Forest Survey, Manager. Chave, J., Andalo, C., Brown, S., Cairns, M.A., Chambers, J.Q., Eamus, D., Fölster, H., Fromard, F., Higuchi, N., Kira, T., & Lescure, J.P. (2005). Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia, 145(1), 87– 99. Clerici, N., Rubiano, K., Abd-Elrahman, A., Posada Hoestettler, J.M., & Escobedo, F.J. (2016). Estimating aboveground biomass and carbon stocks in periurban Andean secondary forests using very high resolution imagery. Forests, 7(7), 138. Glenn, E., Huete, A., Nagler, P., & Nelson, S. (2008). Relationship between remotely-sensed vegetation indices, canopy attributes and plant physiological processes: What vegetation indices can and cannot tell us about the landscape. Sensors, 8(4), 2136–2160. Hossain, M., Saha, C., Abdullah, S.R., Saha, S., & Siddique, M.R.H. (2016). Allometric biomass, nutrient and carbon stock models for Kandelia candel of the Sundarbans, Bangladesh. Trees, 30(3), 709–717. Kebede, B., & Soromessa, T. (2018). Allometric equations for above- ground biomass estimation of Olea europaea L. subsp. cuspidata in Mana Angetu Forest. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 4(1), 1–12. Kumar, P., Dobriyal, M., Kale, A., & Pandey, A. K. (2021). Temporal dynamics change of land use/land cover in Jhansi district of Uttar Pradesh over past 20 years using LANDSAT TM, ETM+ and OLI sensors. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 23, 100579. Kumar, P., Dobriyal, M., Kale, A., Pandey, A. K., Tomar, R. S., & Thounaojam, E. (2022). Calculating forest species diversity with information-theory based indices using sentinel-2A sensor’s of Mahavir Swami Wildlife Sanctuary. PLoS One, 17(5), e0268018. Kumar, P., Pandey, P. C., Kumar, V., Singh, B. K., Tomar, V., & Rani, M. (2014). Efficient recognition of forest species biodiversity by inventory-based geospatial approach using LISS IV sensor. IEEE Sensors Journal, 15(3), 1884–1891. Kumar, P., Pandey, P. C., Singh, B. K., Katiyar, S., Mandal, V. P., Rani, M., ... & Patairiya, S. (2016). Estimation of accumulated soil organic carbon stock in tropical forest using geospatial strategy. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 19(1), 109–123. Kumar, P., Sajjad, H., Mahanta, K. K., Ahmed, R., & Mandal, V. P. (2018). Assessing suitability of allometric models for predicting stem volume of Anogeissus pendula Edgew in sariska Tiger Reserve, India. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 10, 47–55. Kumar, P., Sajjad, H., Tripathy, B. R., Ahmed, R., & Mandal, V. P. (2018). Prediction of spatial soil organic carbon distribution using Sentinel-2A and field inventory data in Sariska Tiger Reserve. Natural Hazards, 90, 693–704. Kumar, P., Sharma, L. K., Pandey, P. C., Sinha, S., & Nathawat, M. S. (2012). Geospatial strategy for tropical forest-wildlife reserve biomass estimation. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 6(2), 917–923. Kumar, P., Sharma, L.K., Pandey, P.C., Sinha, S., & Nathawat, M.S. (2013). Geospatial strategy for tropical forest-wildlife reserve biomass estimation. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 6(2), 917–923. Mitchard, E.T.A., Saatchi, S.S., White, L.J.T., Abernethy, K.A., Jeffery, K.J., Lewis, S.L., Collins, M., Lefsky, M.A., Leal, M.E., Woodhouse, I.H., & Meir, P. (2012). Mapping tropical forest biomass with radar and spaceborne LiDAR: overcoming problems of high biomass and persistent cloud. Biogeosciences Discussions, 9(1), 179–191. Oberthür, S., & Ott, H.E. (1999). The Kyoto Protocol: international climate policy for the 21st century. Springer Science & Business Media. Otukei, J.R., & Emanuel, M. (2015). Estimation and mapping of above ground biomass and carbon of Bwindi impenetrable National Park using ALOS PALSAR data. South African Journal of Geomatics, 4(1), 1–13. Popescu, S.C., Wynne, R.H., & Nelson, R.F. (2003). Measuring individual tree crown diameter with lidar and assessing its influence on estimating forest volume and biomass. Canadian journal of remote sensing, 29(5), 564–577. Segura, M., & Kanninen, M. (2005). Allometric Models for Tree Volume and Total Aboveground Biomass in a Tropical Humid Forest in Costa Rica 1. Biotropica: The Journal of Biology and Conservation, 37(1), 2–8. Singh, R. K., Singh, P., Drews, M., *Kumar, P., Singh, H., Gupta, A. K., ... & Kumar, M. (2021). A machine learning-based classification of LANDSAT images to map land use and land cover of India. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 24, 100624. Vargas-Larreta, B., López-Sánchez, C.A., Corral-Rivas, J.J., López- Martínez, J.O., Aguirre-Calderón, C.G., & Álvarez-González, J.G. (2017). Allometric equations for estimating biomass and carbon stocks in the temperate forests of North-Western Mexico. Forests, 8(8), 269. Vashum, K.T., & Jayakumar, S. (2012). Methods to estimate above- ground biomass and carbon stock in natural forests-A review. J. Ecosyst. Ecogr, 2(4), 1–7.