ImageAnalStereol2009;28:63-67 OriginalResearchPaper THE PIVOTALTESSELLATION LUISM CRUZ-ORIVE DepartmentofMathematics,StatisticsandComputation,Fa cultyofSciences,UniversityofCantabria,Avda. LosCastross/n,E-39005Santander,Spain e-mail: luis.cruz@unican.es (AcceptedApril24,2009) ABSTRACT The tessellation studied here is motivated by some stereolo gical applications of a new expression for the motion invariant density of straight lines in R3. The term ‘pivotal’ stems from the fact that the tessellatio n is constructed within a plane which is isotropic through a fix ed, ‘pivotal’ origin. Consider either a stationary point process, or a stationaryrandomlattice of pointsin th at plane. Througheach point event draw a straight line which is perpendicular to the axis determined by the ori gin and the point event. The union of all such lines (called p-lines) constitutes the mentioned tessellation. We concen trate on the pivotal tessellation based ona stationaryandisotropicplanarPoisson pointprocess; weshowthat thistessellation isnotstationary. Keywords: geometric probability, p-line, pivotal tessellation, Poisson point process, stere ology, stochastic geometry. INTRODUCTION The purposeof this paperis to explore elementary properties of a special planar tessellation stemming from the application of recent stereological results (Cruz-Orive,2005;2008;Gual-ArnauandCruz-Orive, 2009). Consider the equatorial disk B2,t=B3∩L3 2[0], whereB3⊂R3represents a ball of radius Rcentred at the origin OandL2[0]denotes an isotropic plane throughOwith normaldirection t∈S2 +. Within the disk B2,t, generate Nindependent and identically distributed uniform random points {z1,z2,...,zN}, (Fig. 1a). For each i=1,2,...,N, draw a straight line L1(zi)through the point ziand normal to the axis Ozi. ThusL1(zi)is effectively a “point sampled” straight line which will be called a p−line. The union of all p−lines constitutes a tessellation in the reference disk, (Fig. 1b) which will be called a pivotal tessellation, inasmuch as the containing planeL2[0]can only rotate around a fixed ‘pivot’ O. The practical interest of this construction lies in the followingfact.Consideranonvoidcompactsubset Y⊂ B3of volume ν3(Y)with piecewise smooth boundary ∂Yofareaν2(∂Y).Then, /hatwideν2(∂Y) =2aN−1N ∑ i=1ν0{(∂Y∩B2,t)∩L1(zi)}, /hatwideν3(Y) =aN−1N ∑ i=1ν1{(Y∩B2,t)∩L1(zi)},(1) are unbiased estimators of ν2(∂Y)andν3(Y), respectively, where a:=πR2, andν0,ν1denotenumberofintersectionsandchordlength,respectively (Cruz-Orive,2005;2008). Here we are interested in some properties of the pivotal tessellation constituted by the p−lines associatedwith a planarPoissonpointprocess. PRELIMINARIES Given a point z∈R2of polar coordinates (ρ,ω), ρ∈(0,∞),ω∈(0,2π), we define a p-lineL1(z)as a straightline with normalcoordinates (ρ,ω),namely, L1(z):=L1(ρ,ω) =/braceleftbig x= (x1,x2)∈R2:x1cosω+x2sinω=ρ/bracerightbig . (2) Considereithera stationaryplanarpointprocess Φ=/uniondisplay i∈Nzi, (3) with realizationsin R2, orastationaryrandomlattice Λz=Λ0+z=/uniondisplay i∈Nzi, (4) whereΛ0⊂R2is a fixed regular lattice of points and zis a uniform random point in a fundamental tile of Λ0, (Fig. 3a). In either case, the pivotal tessellation associatedwith either ΦorΛzis Ψ=/uniondisplay i∈NL1(zi), (5) 63 CRUZ-ORIVELM:Thepivotaltessellation O O (a) (b) Fig. 1.(a) Disk centred at O containing 50 independent uniform rand om point events. (b) Associated pivotal tessellationformedbythecorresponding p-lineswith resp ectto O. namelythecorrespondingprocessof p-lines,(Figs.1b, 3b). In this paper P(dx)represents the probability element of a random variable X, namely P(dx):= P(x0. ρR Oz1 BR Fig. 2.The probability that a p-line L 1(z2)associated with a UR point z 2∈BRhits a given p-chordL 1(z1)∩ BR(thickstraightlinesegmentinthefigure)isequalto the probability that z 2falls in the support set (shaded region)ofthegiven p-chordwith respecttoO. Proof.Fix one of the two points, e.g.,z1= (ρ,ω),ρ∈(0,R),ω∈(0,2π), and denote by p(ρ,ω;R)the required probability conditional on (ρ,ω). By the definition of support set (Cruz-Orive, 2005; Gual-Arnau and Cruz-Orive, 2009), it follows thatp(ρ,ω;R)is the probability that z2falls in thesupport set HL1(z1)∩BRof the chord L1(z1)∩BRwith respect to the disk centre O(see Fig. 2). Bearing in mind that P(dz2) = (πR2)−1dz2,z2∈BR, wehave p(ρ,ω;R):=P{L1(z1)∩L2(z2)∈BR|ρ,ω} =/integraldisplay HL1(z1)∩BRP(dz2) (15) =1 2−2 π·gdisk/parenleftbigg/radicalBig 1−ρ2/R2/parenrightbigg , where gdisk(x) =1 2/parenleftBig cos−1x−x/radicalbig 1−x2/parenrightBig ,(0≤x≤1), (16) isthegeometriccovariogramofadiskofunitdiameter. It isreadily verifiedthat, P{L1(z1)∩L2(z2)∈BR}=/integraldisplayR 0p(ρ,ω;R)P(dρ) =3 8, (17) where P(dρ)is givenbythefirstEq.9. /square Proposition 2. Letλ(0) 0(R),λ(1) 0(R), andλ(2) 0(R) denote the mean total numbers per unit disk area of the vertices, edges and connectedregions constituting the boundedtessellation Ψ∩BR,respectively.Then, λ(0) 0(R) =3π 16τ2R2+2τ, λ(1) 0(R) =3π 8τ2R2+3τ, (18) λ(2) 0(R) =3π 16τ2R2+τ+1 πR2, where the terms following the first one in the right hand side of the preceding identities represent the contributionsofthe diskboundary ∂BR. Proof.WeusethemethodofSantal´ o(1940;1976 p.51).Conditionalonthenumber Nofp-linesfrom Ψ hittingBR,letVBo(N),V∂B(N)denotethemeannumber of verticesinterior to BRand in∂BR, respectively,and setVBo(N)+V∂B(N) =V(N).ThenusingLemma2, E{V(N)|N}=/parenleftbiggN 2/parenrightbigg3 8+2N.(19) Likewise, let EBo(N),E∂B(N)denote the mean number of edges interior to BRand in ∂BR, respectively, and set EBo(N) +E∂B(N) =E(N). At each interior vertex there meet 4 edges, but they are counted twice because each edge has two vertices as endpoints.On the other hand,at eachboundaryvertex 65 CRUZ-ORIVELM:Thepivotaltessellation (a) (b)O O Fig. 3.(a) A realization of a stationary random square lattice insi de a disk. The centre O of the disk is uniform randominatileofthelattice(shadedsquare).(b)Theassoc iatedpivotallatticetessellationinsidethedisk,which is in factthekindofprobeusedin theapplications(Cruz-Or ive,2005;2008). theremeet3edges,buttheyarealsocountedtwice for the samereason.Therefore, E{E(N)|N}=2/parenleftbiggN 2/parenrightbigg3 8+3N.(20) Finally, let F(N)denote the total number of connected regions or “faces”. By Euler’s formula we haveV(N)+F(N)−E(N) =1, andtherefore, E{F(N)|N}=/parenleftbiggN 2/parenrightbigg3 8+N+1.(21) Taking expectations on both sides of each of the identities (Eqs. 19–21) with respect to N, bearing Eq. 8 in mind, and dividing by πR2in each case, the correspondingidentities (Eq. 18)are obtained. /square Definition. Themeannumberofvertices(orofsides), the mean boundary length, and the mean area of a connected region from the bounded tessellation Ψ∩ BR, aredefinedrespectivelyasfollows, E{N(R)}=2λ(1) 0(R) λ(2) 0(R), E{B(R)}=2λ2 1(R)+2/R λ(2) 0(R), (22) E{A(R)}=1 λ(2) 0(R). Proposition 3. The characteristics given in the preceding definition satisfy the following asymptoticrelations, E{N(R)}=4+O(R−2), E{B(R)}=O(R−1), (23) E{A(R)}=O(R−2). Proof.Substitute the results Eq. 11 and Eq. 18 into Eq.22. /square CONCLUSIONSANDCOMMENTS Concerning the planar pivotal Poisson tessellation Ψ, the main conclusion is that it is not stationary, as illustrated by the results (Eqs.11, 18, and 23). The asymptotic mean number of vertices of a polygon is 4, as in the ordinary Poisson tessellation of straight lines(Stoyan etal.,1995),buttheremainingproperties change with the distance from the origin. The non stationarity is intuitively plausible on seeing Fig. 1b. A priori one might think that, because p-lines on an isotropic plane L2[0]are effectively motion invariant inR3, and because the associated point process is stationary Poisson, then Ψwould also be stationary in R2, but this is not the case. As confirmed by Eq. 13, the length density of the p−lines of the planar pivotal Poisson tessellation must be constant in R3because they are motion invariant in R3. Note that the plane L2[0]islessandless“dense”awayfromtheorigin;this effectmustbecompensatedbyahigherandhigherline length density in that plane away from the origin, and this isindeedwhathappens. 66 ImageAnalStereol2009;28:63-67 For estimation purposes via Eq. 1 it is simpler and more efficient to start with a stationary random lattice of points (Fig. 3a), instead of a Poisson point process. The corresponding pivotal lattice tessellation (Fig. 3b) will enjoy similar properties. An exactstudy ofthelattermightbeprohibitive,however,becausethe number of lattice points inside a disk is a complicated oscillating functionofthediskdiameter. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to a referee for pointing out a mistake in Lemma 2 from the original typescript which affected the value of the constant in Eq. 14, as well as some imprecisions. Work supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science I+D ProjectMTM2005-08689-C02-01.REFERENCES Cruz-Orive LM (2005). A new stereological principle for testlinesinthree-dimensionalspace.JMicrosc219:18- 28. Cruz-OriveLM(2008).Comparativeprecisionofthepivotal estimators of particle size. Image Anal Stereol 27:17- 22. Gual-Arnau X, Cruz-Orive LM (2009). A new expression forthedensityoftotallygeodesicsubmanifoldsinspace forms,with stereologicalapplications.Diff GeomAppl 27:124-8. Santal´ oLA(1940).Valormediodeln´ umerodepartesenque una figura convexa es dividida por nrectas arbitrarias. RevUnionMatArgentina7:33-7. Santal´ o LA (1976). Integral Geometry and Geometric Probability.Reading,Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. Stoyan D, Kendall WS, Mecke J (1995). Stochastic Geometry and its Applications. Chichester: J Wiley & Sons. 67