Radiol Oncol 2021; 55(1): 7-17. doi: 10.2478/raon-2020-0063 7 review Physical activity and cancer risk. Actual knowledge and possible biological mechanisms Mihaela Jurdana Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, Izola, Slovenia Radiol Oncol 2021; 55(1): 7-17. Received 11 July 2020 Accepted 25 September 2020 Correspondence to: Mihaela Jurdana, Ph.D., Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, Polje 42, SI-6310 Izola, Slovenija. Phone: +386 5 662 64 69; Fax.: +386 5 662 64 80 Disclosure: No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed. Background. Scientific evidence has shown that an increase in regular physical activity is associated with a de- crease in the development of many types of cancer. Potential mechanisms that link physical activity to reduced cancer risk include a decrease in systemic inflammation, hyperinsulinemia, insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I), sex hor- mones, pro-inflammatory leptin and other obesity-related cytokines, and a significant increase in anti-inflammatory adiponectin levels. In addition, physical activity improves immune function and the composition and diversity of the gastrointestinal microbiota. Moderate physical activity is important for cancer protection, but the most significant changes in the inflammatory profile are conferred by physical activity performed at higher intensities. Thus, there is a need for further investigation into the type, intensity, and duration of physical activity for the prevention of some types of cancer and the development of effective recommendations. Conclusions. There is a strong evidence that physical activity of moderate to vigorous intensity protects against colon and breast cancer, and probably against cancer at all other sites. Key words: physical activity; cancer; pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines; biological mechanisms Introduction The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) reports that 25% of all cancer cases world- wide are caused by obesity and sedentary life- style.1 The idea of physical activity as a means for preventing cancer was explored in the early 20th century when two studies were published, sug- gesting that cancer mortality rates among men with different occupations decreased with in- creased physical activity.2,3 To date, the evidence of “skeletal muscle contraction effect” has been growing rapidly and many epidemiological stud- ies on the role of physical activity in cancer pre- vention have been published. There is substantial evidence that greater physical activity levels lower the risk of some cancers.4 Recently gathered data has revealed that physical activity is associated with various site-specific cancers in many ways. In addition, preclinical studies have indicated that physical activity may similarly reduce cancer pro- gression, its recurrence and have an impact on bet- ter survival rates.5 Furthermore, physical activity could decrease breast and colon cancer incidence with a linear dose response relationship indicating that engaging in longer exercise sessions or exer- cising with higher intensity will result in a greater reduction in cancer risk.4,6 New evidence suggests that a comparable association might exist for other cancers, but for a complete evaluation, physical activity type, frequency and intensity need to be assessed.7 The World Cancer Research Fund’s first report indicated a strong positive impact of physi- cal activity in relation to colorectal and breast can- cer.8,9 Furthermore, cancer risk varies within popu- lation subgroups such as a gender, age, race, body mass index, and physical fitness level. The effects of physical activity on the cancer outcome are as- sociated with these parameters. 6 The recent data of a multi-ethnic cohort study confirm the association Radiol Oncol 2021; 55(1): 7-17. Jurdana M / Physical activity and cancer8 between physical activity and colon cancer risk, and suggest possible differences in the strength of the association according to race and ethnicity.10 Several acceptable biological mechanisms link physical activity with cancer, including changes in sex hormones and other metabolic hormones, de- crease in body fat mass and central adiposity, an increase in anti-inflammatory myokines exerting anti-inflammatory responses, and recently demon- strated changes in microbiota composition. This review provides data from epidemiological studies on physical activity and cancer, and biolog- ical mechanisms to explain the association between physical activity and cancer. Physical activity recommendations Significant decreases in cancer incidence have been demonstrated among those who take into ac- count the physical activity recommendations.11 The American Cancer Society (ACS), the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have published recommen- dations considered to reduce the risk of various diseases including cancer.12 In summary, the rec- ommendations for adults of 150 minutes (2.5h) to 300 minutes (5h) of moderate physical activity, or at least 75 minutes (1.25 hours) to 150 minutes (2.5h) of vigorous physical activity per week, can reduce cancer risk. For additional health benefits, muscle-strengthening activities involving major muscle groups should be conducted on two or more days a week. 12,13 To express the intensity level of physical ac- tivity, the rate of energy expenditure expressed as metabolic equivalents (METs) are commonly used.13 One MET is the rate of energy expenditure while sitting at rest, which for most people ap- proximates an oxygen uptake of 3.5 millilitres per kilogram of body weight per minute. The energy expenditure of other activities is expressed in mul- tiples of METs. A 3 MET activity expends 3 times the energy used at rest. The MET model is used in epidemiological studies and provides general medical thresholds and guidelines for a popula- tion.4 Based on the MET hours/week (MET h/w) mod- el, physical activity can be classified as occupation- al physical activity (OPA) or leisure time physical activity (LTPA). OPA is low for sitting work, mod- erate for standing and walking work and high for manual work. LTPA is low for activities < 3MET, moderate for activities approximately 3–6 MET and vigorous or high intensity for activities > 6 MET.13 (Figure 1). A recent study by Matthews et al., provides strong evidence that current recom- mendation levels of LTPA, both moderate to vig- orous (7.5–15 MET h/w or 150–300 minutes/week) provide cancer (colon, breast, endometrial, kidney, myeloma, liver, non-Hodgkin lymphoma) protec- tion in a dose dependent manner.4 Minor incidence of some cancer types seems to be correlated with vigorous LTPA. 4 Actual knowledge on the association between physical activity and cancer Several studies have been performed to assess the effect of LTPA in lowering cancer risk. There is con- vincing evidence of the beneficial effect of physical activity on the risk of colon and breast cancer and probable evidence for other cancers.4,6,7 Original scientific articles and systematic reviews (based largely on epidemiological studies consisting of large cohorts and case controls) have demonstrat- METs = metabolic equivalents FIGURE 1. Levels of physical activity intensity (sedentary behaviour, low, moderate and vigorous or high). Radiol Oncol 2021; 55(1): 7-17. Jurdana M / Physical activity and cancer 9 ed a dose–response relationship between physical activity and cancer risk.4,14 Breast cancer In 1980 it was hypothesized that physical activity protects against breast cancer and many studies have confirmed this association risk.15 Physical activity is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer incidence and better survival rates among women with breast cancer diagnosis.16 Physically active women had up to 20% lower risk incidence of breast cancer in comparison to inactive women, providing evidence that physical activity influences sex hormones, insulin resistance, and in- flammatory adipokines.17,18 Another early case con- trol study demonstrated a clear reduction of breast cancer in younger women during the reproductive period, who engaged in the recommended level of physical activity (3–6 MET h/w).19 Similarly, obser- vational evidence suggests that regular physical activity reduces the risk of breast cancer incidence and mortality among obese menopausal and post- menopausal women.20-23 The Nurses’ Health Study collected information over 29 years and reported that moderate or vigor- ous physical activity for 7 or more hours per week (> 6 MET h/w) compared to those who reported less than 1 hour per week (< 3 MET h/w) resulted in a 20 % reduction in developing breast cancer. The association was similar in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women.24,25 Campbell et al. state that regular exercise in as- sociation with weight reduction decreases the lev- els of sex hormones, as well as reducing breast can- cer risk.26 In this study, more than 400 overweight to obese sedentary women, aged 50–75 years, were assigned to one of the following groups: a) moder- ate to vigorous intensity aerobic exercise only, b) diet only, c) moderate to vigorous intensity aerobic exercise and diet, and d) control. They found that physical activity among postmenopausal women might lower breast cancer risk by reducing fat mass, alongside a significantly greater decrease of estrogen and significantly increased sex hormone– binding globulin (SHBG)27 which regulates the availability of free estrogen to hormone sensitive tissue by binding biologically active estrogen. Taken together, these findings suggest that weight loss is the key factor linking alterations in diet or exercise to sex hormone changes. In the study conducted by Niehoff et al. 2019 the associa- tion between physical activity and breast cancer risk was examined in a large population of women with a family history of breast cancer. This demon- strated that physical activity was associated with reduced postmenopausal, but not premenopausal, breast cancer risk.28 The diversity of available data of physical activity and cancer association is due to population heterogeneity and the influence of breast cancer modifiable and non-modifiable fac- tors, such as genetics, early age menarche, nul- liparity, older age at first childbirth and breast- feeding.29 Although there is a proven link between physical activity and breast cancer, the type and dose of physical activity may have a varied effect. Physical activity can reduce the risk of breast can- cer in women who engaged with moderate inten- sity levels. In addition, a greater decreased risk was found for vigorous intensity levels of physical ac- tivity with a stronger association in postmenopau- sal women.4 Risk reduction was observed among women who participated in physical activity dur- ing all periods in their lives. Colon and rectal cancer To date, the most definitive epidemiological stud- ies have provided consistent evidence that physi- cal activity is associated with a lower risk of colon cancer.8,30,31 A meta-analysis of numerous prospective stud- ies, examining the association between physical activity of various intensity levels and the risk of developing colon and rectal cancer have been evaluated, showing that increased levels of physi- cal activity considerably decreases the colon and rectal cancer risk.32 Moreover, others reported that higher levels of physical activity in colon cancer survivors have a minor possibility of cancer recur- rence and improved survival compared to inactive survivors.33 Risk reduction for colon cancer in physically ac- tive individuals was greater in case control stud- ies (24%) in comparison with cohort studies (17%). Similar results were found for OPA (22%) and LTPA (23%).34 The association between colon cancer and physical activity in case control studies showed an equally significant risk reduction for men and women (24%) while in cohort studies this asso- ciation was greater for men than for women.4,35,36 The effects of physical activity on colon and rectal cancer may be influenced by different parameters; physical activity type, intensity, frequency and du- ration, as well as vary by sex and race/ethnicity.37 The large multiethnic cohort study conducted by Park et al., demonstrated an inverse association be- Radiol Oncol 2021; 55(1): 7-17. Jurdana M / Physical activity and cancer10 tween moderate/vigorous activity and colorectal cancer risk, which appears to be stronger in men, especially among men with longer sitting time.10 A possible explanation of the diverse benefits be- tween the sexes may reflect hormonal differences.10 The case–control study of Boyle considered 870 colorectal cancers cases (proximal colon, dis- tal colon and rectal), compared 996 age and sex matched healthy controls, and analysed the tim- ing and intensity of physical activity on sub site specific colorectal cancer risk, showing a strong reduction of distal colon cancer risk.38 Authors of this study demonstrated that physical activity with more than 6 MET h/w was associated with a lower distal colon cancer risk by about 40%, while an in- crease of physical activity to 18 MET h/w further increased the percentage of cancer risk reduction. An association between physical activity and rec- tal cancer in participants exercising 6 MET h/w or more was also observed. In general, the overall da- ta show no association between the total physical activity level and recreational physical activity and rectal cancer. Recently, it was found that LTPA was associated with a lower risk of both, colon and rec- tal cancer.22 A health initiative observational study found an inverse association between leisure time physical activity and rectal cancer, particularly, in postmenopausal women.39 Another case control study revealed that partici- pants who spent more than ten years in sedentary work presented a greater risk of distal colon can- cer and rectal cancer compared to those who never held sedentary work.40 However, the risk was sig- nificantly reduced in participants who performed jobs requiring heavy activity.40 The health benefits of moderate to vigorous physical activity have been recently proposed to prevent colorectal cancer among people with long- er sitting times.10 In addition, others confirm the protective role of moderate physical activity with the risk of the polyp’s development and adeno- mas.41 Other cancer sites Many studies reported on the association be- tween physical activity and lower risk of several other site-specific types of cancer.9,42 Evidence is less consistent than for breast and colorectal can- cer and can be classified as probable or possible. Regardless, patient data from nine cohort studies (US, European and Australian cohorts) including adult engagement in the recommended amounts of LTPA (moderate to intense activity) demonstrate, in addition to colon and breast cancer, also lower risk levels for endometrial and kidney cancer, liver cancer, lung, gastric and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (women only).4,42 Endometrial cancer Previous meta-analysis studies of endometrial can- cers found evidence of a decreased risk in mod- erately to vigorously physically active women.43 Many other studies investigated the influence of physical activity and body mass, since obesity is a strong risk factor for endometrial cancer as it is related to physical inactivity.44 Bladder cancer The meta-analysis of many cohort studies and several case-control studies reported lower rates of bladder cancer for individuals with the highest level of recreational or OPA than those who were the least physically active.45 The LTPA of over one million individuals was associated with a reduced risk of bladder and kidney cancer.22 Lung cancer Lung cancer has been less well studied than the cancers described above, but some epidemiologi- cal studies have revealed an association between physical activity and reduced cancer risk among former and current smokers.46 Prostate cancer Evidence suggesting that physical activity can reduce prostate cancer risk is on the increase. Although rigorous physical activity may be need- ed to influence hormone levels involved in the eti- ology of this cancer.47 The data for several other cancers are limited and further research is needed in order to strength- en the hypothesis that physical activity reduces the development of cancer.22 Preliminary evidence suggests that higher levels of physical activity may influence cancer risk at several of these sites.22 Potential biological mechanisms in the relation between physical activity and cancer risk The most commonly hypothesized mechanisms proposed for physical activity and reduced cancer Radiol Oncol 2021; 55(1): 7-17. Jurdana M / Physical activity and cancer 11 risk are presented below. Moreover, the associa- tion between physical activity and gut microbiota composition in relation to cancer is described. The effects of physical activity on cancer prevention are summarized in Figure 2. Anti-inflammatory action of muscle derived myokines Skeletal muscle plays an important role in coun- teracting pro-inflammatory effects. During the past decade, it was identified as a secretory or- gan.48 Cytokines or other peptides that are pro- duced, expressed and released by skeletal muscle and exert autocrine, paracrine or endocrine effects should be classified as ‘myokines’. It has been sug- gested that myokines may contribute to exercise- induced protection against several chronic dis- eases.48 Inflammation is a normal component of host defence; however, chronic low-grade inflam- mation is a key contributor in a range of chronic diseases and plays a critical role in cancer devel- opment and is crucial for the sustenance of the processes of tumorigenesis.49 Interleukin-1 (IL-1), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) are inflammatory cytokines that have been measured in relation to cancer.49 Increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and a decrease in anti-inflammatory cytokines have been linked to increased cancer risk and a permanent presence of inflammatory cytokines also maintains an en- vironment in which cancer cells can proliferate.49 Evidence suggests that regularly performed LTPA, moderate to vigorous may reduce markers of sys- temic inflammation.50 However, there is a sub- stantial body of evidence that high-intensity or prolonged endurance training leads to increased oxidative stress that may result in a pro-inflamma- tory response from the immune system to protect the host tissue.51 In addition, an increase in the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines can be crucial for long-term adaptive responses to exer- cise training.52 Although high-intensity endurance training can increase antioxidant enzyme activity and reduce markers of training-induced oxida- tive stress, very high training loads of elite and non-elite athletes participating in ultra-endurance competitions are associated with an acute reduc- tion in antioxidant capacity and an increase in markers of oxidative stress.53 SHBG = sex hormone–binding globulin FIGURE 2. The effects of physical activity on cancer prevention. Moderate to vigorous physical activity improves immune function, total antioxidant capacity, increases SHBG production and anti-inflammatory plasma adiponectin and improves gut microbiota composition. In addition, moderate to vigorous physical activity decreases systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, reduces adipose tissue and hyperinsulinemia, decreases inflammatory hormone leptin and regulates sex hormone levels. Radiol Oncol 2021; 55(1): 7-17. Jurdana M / Physical activity and cancer12 Skeletal muscle is an important source of anti- inflammatory myokines, including muscle derived interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 8 (IL-8), interleukin 15 (IL-15), and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), which act as antagonists to the generally pro-inflammatory cytokines.54 The pro-inflammatory TNF-α plays an impor- tant role in cancer promotion.55 TNF-α was origi- nally identified as a factor that caused tumor ne- crosis in high concentrations; its activity at moder- ate levels can promote tumor growth. One of the key functions for TNF-α is to activate the pro-in- flammatory transcription factor (NFκB), involved in cancer pathogenesis.56 Interestingly, IL-6 produced by monocytes or macrophages acts as a pro-inflammatory response, whereas skeletal muscle derived IL-6 acts as an anti-inflammatory response by reducing TNF-α concentration or NFκB activation.57 It turns out that regenerative or anti-inflam- matory activities of interleukin-6 are mediated by classic signalling, whereas pro-inflammatory responses of interleukin-6 are rather mediated by trans signaling.58 In classic signaling, interleukin-6 stimulates target cells via a membrane bound in- terleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R), which upon ligand binding associates with the signalling receptor pro- tein gp130 and trigger the activation of the JAK/ STAT signalling pathway. In cells that express only gp130 but not IL-6R, IL-6 binds to the soluble IL-6R (sIL-6R) and the complex in turn binds to gp130 to trigger activation of intracellular signalling, known as trans signaling.58 Skeletal muscle IL-6 was the first identified myokine and, to date, the most studied myokine which is produced and released by contracting skeletal muscle fibres, exerting extensive anti- inflammatory effects in other organs via an in- flammatory (TNF-α) independent pathway.59 IL-6 was discovered as a myokine because of the ob- servation that IL-6 increases up to 100-fold in the circulation during and after physical activity.59 Therefore, the exercise release of IL-6 induces an increase in anti-inflammatory IL-1ra and IL-10. In most exercise-related studies, TNF-α does not change and is likely to be suppressed by the mus- cle derived IL-6, as demonstrated by a modest de- crease of TNF-α after exercise.48 This confirms that anti-inflammatory effects of regular exercise can protect against systemic low-grade inflammation. The anti-inflammatory effects can be mediated by a reduction in visceral fat and body fat as well as by an anti-inflammatory environment through the release of myokines.59,60 Another skeletal muscle myokine, IL-15, has been identified as an anabolic factor in muscle growth and it appears to play an important role in fat metabolism.60 Interestingly, a negative as- sociation between plasma IL-15 concentration and abdominal fat mass was established, which sup- ports the idea that muscle-expressed IL-15 may be involved in the reduction of visceral fat mass and may play an important role in the decrease of many cancer risks.57 Skeletal muscle is an endocrine organ, which, in addition to releasing myokines, also produces and secretes microRNAs into circulation.61 Loss of function microRNA experiments demonstrated that microRNAs have significant roles in the regu- lation of protein function in cancer, cancer cell pro- liferation and survival.61 Immune function It has been demonstrated that moderate physical activity may enhance the immune function by in- creasing the number and activity of immune func- tion cells such as neutrophils, eosinophils, mono- cytes and lymphocytes, and stimulate an increase in natural killer cells which have an important role in tumor suppression.5,62 Interestingly, regular moderate physical activity can increase the total antioxidant capacity of defence and be responsi- ble for the elimination of reactive oxygen species (ROS).5 These highly reactive species are responsi- ble for oxidative stress and play an important role in the progression of various types of human can- cer.63 Moderate to vigorous physical activity can also provide a higher number of mitochondria in skeletal muscles that consequently provide a great- er capacity to reduce oxidative stress.64 Indeed, each mitochondrion has a reduced oxidative load, and, as such, more electrons are directed to cy- tochrome oxidase instead of producing reactive oxygen species.65 Hormones Regular moderate to vigorous intensities of physi- cal activity influences the levels of biologically available sex hormones and decreases the incidence of hormone-related cancers, including breast can- cer, endometrium, ovaries, and prostate cancer.66,67 Many studies have concluded that physical activ- ity modifies metabolic hormone levels by lowering circulating fat, which produces the sex hormones responsible for the stimulatory effect on mammary glands and increases SHBG production, reducing Radiol Oncol 2021; 55(1): 7-17. Jurdana M / Physical activity and cancer 13 their ability to influence target tissue. During men- opause, the concentration of estrogens declines, but adipose tissue in obese women still produces estrogens after menopause.68 Physical activity re- sponsible for reducing body fat mass, counteracts adipose tissue and is crucial for the reduction of breast cancer risk.68 Another study performed on premenopausal women demonstrated that regular physical activity and high LTPA reduce the concen- tration of estradiol and increase SHBG independ- ent of obesity, thus indicating that the protective effect of exercise is not completely mediated by the changes in adiposity.69 Furthermore, excess levels of some androgens in men have been suggested to increase the risk of prostate cancer. Increased pro- duction of SHBG during physical activity may pre- vent prostate cancer development by decreasing the levels of biologically available testosterone.47 Regular moderate to vigorous physical activ- ity affects cancer risk by reducing the levels of in- sulin and insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-1).70 High levels of (IGF-1) and insulin resistance have been responsible for an increased risk of various cancer types.70 The epidemiological evidence between insulin levels and cancer risk is associated with hyperinsulinemia. Insulin is a powerful mitogen and is involved in glucose metabolism enhancing tumor development. Hyperinsulinemia promotes the synthesis and activity of (IGF-1), a mitogen that increases cellular proliferation, differentia- tion and transformation and inhibits apoptosis.71 Intervention strategies including regular physi- cal activity reduce insulin levels, fasting glucose levels, decrease hepatic and muscle insulin resist- ance, and total IGF-1, increase glucose transporter protein and mRNA, increase activity of glycogen synthase and hexokinase, decrease release and in- crease clearance of free fatty acids, increase muscle glucose delivery because of increased muscle cap- illary density, and effect changes in muscle com- position to increase glucose disposal.72 This proves that the mechanism involved is directly associated with skeletal muscle contraction during exercise. Adiposity Chronic low-grade inflammation in adiposity is associated with a higher risk of several cancer types.73-75 Adipose tissue as an endocrine organ which produces and releases a variety of pro- inflammatory cytokines such as (IL- 6), (TNF-α), (CRP), leptin, and anti-inflammatory adiponectin. During exercise, in particular resistance training, skeletal muscle cells produce and express anti- inflammatory myokines, belonging to distinctly different families, responsible for reducing pro- inflammatory leptin, (IL-6) and (TNF-α) secretion and significantly increase the adiponectin level.76 Some pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as the obesity hormone leptin, have a potential role in the development of a large variety of malignan- cies and are currently at the centre of the obesity- cancer link.77 In humans, excessive adipose tissue is directly associated with elevated levels of leptin, which is significantly higher in women than in men, even after the adjustment for total body fat mass.78,79 One explanation for this tendency is a differential regulation of leptin expression by sex hormones; estrogens were observed to increase leptin levels, while testosterone was observed to decrease leptin levels.80 Leptin, in addition, can act as a mitogen and can increase the expression of anti-apoptotic proteins, inflammatory (TNF-α and IL-6), and angiogenic factors (VEGF). Interestingly, the effects of exercise, and particularly resistance exercise, can reduce leptin concertation, exerting an anti-inflammatory response.76, 81-83 To date, the evidence that leptin can indeed be involved in the neoplastic processes has been provided by studies on breast and colorectal cancer, while limited stud- ies are available for other cancer types.84 Moreover, adipose tissue adiponectin levels have been shown to exert anti-inflammatory ac- tions and may thus counteract the increased can- cer risk seen in obesity-induced inflammation.85 Plasma adiponectin levels are known to be associ- ated with insulin sensitivity and the risk of devel- oping metabolic disorders and malignancy.86 As exercise training improves insulin sensitivity and prevents the development of obesity related dis- eases, it has been proposed that exercise-induced improvement in insulin sensitivity is mediated through the regulation of plasma adiponectin lev- els. In addition, low serum adiponectin levels and high serum leptin levels are independent risks for cancer metastasis.87 Since physical inactivity is strongly linked with excess weight/obesity, and both are important risk factors for cancer develop- ment, regular physical activity appears to be im- portant for the prevention of cancer development through reduction adiposity, in particular the met- abolically active abdominal fat both of which are known to contribute to systemic inflammation.83 The role of microbiota composition The human gastrointestinal tract (GIT) is colonized by trillions of microbial cells, and numerous studies Radiol Oncol 2021; 55(1): 7-17. Jurdana M / Physical activity and cancer14 have shown the importance of gut microbiota com- position in several physiological and pathological processes, including local gastrointestinal cancer, as well as others such as distal cancer (head and neck, breast, oesophageal, pancreatic, and prostate cancer).88 A microbial imbalance or dysbiosis can be caused by several risk factors, such as aging, smoking, having an unhealthy diet, and inflam- mation that increases the host’s risk for neoplastic transformation.89 Gut microbiota provides nutri- ents, regulates epithelial development, and affects the immune system. Additionally, an augmented microbial diversity is associated with improve- ment in the health status and the immune system.90 It has been demonstrated that gut microbiota can be modulated by different factors. Recently, hu- man and animal studies have revealed that aerobic exercise increases microbiota diversity, altering the bacterial composition and influencing the produc- tion of important metabolites of gut bacteria.91 Regular aerobic physical activity affects colon motility, provides a positive effect on the gut by reducing transient stool time and contact time be- tween pathogens and the gastrointestinal mucosa layer.92 Physical activity may reduce prostaglan- dine production and inflammation and protect the integrity of the intestine. In this manner, physical activity prevents the risk of many diseases such as colon cancer, diverticulosis and other inflamma- tory diseases.93 Other possible positive effects of exercise include elevated short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and immunoglobulin production and an increase in butyrate concentration. The increase of fecal butyrate has anti-carcinogenic and anti-in- flammatory properties.94 In addition, exercise can prevent obesity and induce changes in microbiota composition and diversity, and potentially con- tribute to reducing weight and obesity-associated pathologies.95 Recently, it has been demonstrated that aerobic exercise training alters the gut micro- biota and microbial-derived SCFA in sedentary lean and obese adults without any changes to di- etary patterns.96 This evidence supports the idea that regular physical activity appears to be an im- portant environmental factor that induces changes in microbial composition benefits for the host, and stimulates gut bacteria to produce substrates that protect against GIT disorders and colon cancer. Conclusions The epidemiological data for the beneficial effects of physical activity and cancer risk are being gath- ered rapidly and several possible mechanisms have been proposed to explain the link between physi- cal activity and cancer. Physical activity can reduce the risk of various types of cancers by mechanisms including: decreasing markers of systemic inflam- mation by releasing anti-inflammatory myokines, improving insulin resistance, reducing leptin lev- els and hyperinsulinemia, increasing adiponectin levels and function of immune cells, decreasing circulating estrogen and androgen levels, and decreasing transient stool time and contact time between pathogens and the gastrointestinal mu- cosa layer. Discovering that skeletal muscle is an endocrine organ elucidated some of the proposed mechanisms. Based on the current level of knowledge, some unexplained factors remain: existing evidence is limited to be able to support a specific dose of physical activity among a specific population sub- group, tailored for site-specific cancer reduction; how to measure precise physical activity; and how different type, dose and intensities of exercise are attributed to lowering certain cancer risks. General guidelines recommend 150 minutes of moderate physical activity or at least 75 of vigorous physi- cal activity per week.11, 97 The second report by the World Cancer Research Fund (WRCF) states that “more physical activity is better”. Although any dose of physical activity is important for the reduc- tion of cancer risk; to date, data from numerous studies have reported that higher levels of physical activity (150–300 minutes per week or 7–15 MET h/w) in particular, making vigorous is important for cancer prevention.4 References 1. Vainio H, Kaaks R, Bianchini F. Weight control and physical activity in cancer prevention: international evaluation of the evidence. Eur J Cancer Prev 2002; 11 (Suppl 2): S94-100. 2. Cherry T. A theory of cancer. Med J Australia 1922; 1: 425-38. 3. Sivertsen I, Dahlstrom AW. The relation of muscular activity to carcinoma: a preliminary report. J Cancer Res 1922; 6: 365-78. 4. Matthews CE, Moore SC, Arem H, Cook MB, Trabert B, Håkansson N, et al. Amount and intensity of leisure-time physical activity and lower cancer risk. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38: 686-97. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02407 5. Assi M, Dufresne S, Rébillard A. Exercise shapes redox signaling in cancer. Redox Biol 2020; 35: 101439. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101439 6. Friedenreich CM. Physical activity and breast cancer: review of the epide- miologic evidence and biologic mechanisms. Recent Results Cancer Res 2011; 188: 125-39. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-10858-7_11 7. Thune I, Furberg AS. Physical activity and cancer risk: dose-response and cancer, all sites and site-specific. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: S530-S610. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200106001-00025 Radiol Oncol 2021; 55(1): 7-17. Jurdana M / Physical activity and cancer 15 8. World Cancer Research Fund and the American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, nutrition, physical activity and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington DC: American Institute for Cancer Research; 1997. 9. Wiseman M. The second World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research expert report. Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Proc Nutr Soc 2008; 67: 253-56. doi: 10.1017/S002966510800712X 10. Park SY, Wilkens LR, Haiman CA, Le Marchand L. Physical activity and colorectal cancer risk by sex, race/ethnicity, and subsite: the multiethnic cohort study. Cancer Prev Res 2019; 12: 315-26. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207. CAPR-18-0452 11. Kabat GC, Matthews CE, Kamensky V, Hollenbeck AR, Rohan TE. Adherence to cancer prevention guidelines and cancer incidence, cancer mortality, and total mortality: a prospective cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr 2015; 101: 558- 69. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.094854 12. Coletta AM, Marquez G, Thomas P, Thoman W, Bevers T, Brewsteret AM, et al. Clinical factors associated with adherence to aerobic and resistance physical activity guidelines among cancer prevention patients and survivors. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0220814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220814. 13. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET in- tensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: S498-516. doi: 10.1097/00005768- 200009001-00009 14. Rezende LFM, Sá TH, Markozannes G, Rey-López JP, Lee IM, Tsilidis KK, et al. Physical activity and cancer: an umbrella review of the literature including 22 major anatomical sites and 770 000 cancer cases. Br J Sports Med 2018: 52: 826-33. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098391 15. Wu Y, Zhang D, Kang S. Physical activity and risk of breast cancer: a meta- analysis of prospective studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 137: 869-82. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2396-7 16. Spei ME, Samoli E, Bravi F, La Vecchia C, Bamia C, Benetou V. Physical activ- ity in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis on overall and breast cancer survival. Breast 2019; 44: 144-52. doi: 10.1016/j. breast.2019.02.001 17. de Boer MC, Wörner EA, Verlaan D, van Leeuwen PA. The mechanisms and effects of physical activity on breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2017; 17: 272-78. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.01.006 18. Friedenreich CM, Cust AE. Physical activity and breast cancer risk: impact of timing, type and dose of activity and population subgroup effects. Br J Sports Med 2008; 42: 636-47. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.029132 19. Bernstein L, Henderson BE, Hanisch R, Sullivan-Halley J, Rosset RK. Physical exercise and reduced risk of breast cancer in young women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994; 86: 1403-08. doi: 10.1093/jnci/86.18.1403 20. Kushi LH, Doyle C, McCullough M, Rock CL, Demark-Wahnefried W, Bandera EV, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines on nutrition and physical activity for cancer prevention: reducing the risk of cancer with healthy food choices and physical activity. CA Cancer J Clin 2012; 62: 30-67. doi: 10.3322/ caac.20140 21. Clinton SK, Giovannucci EL & Hursting SD. The World Cancer Research Fund/ American Institute for Cancer Research third expert report on diet, nutri- tion, physical activity, and cancer: impact and future directions. J Nutr 2020; 150(4):663-71. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxz268 22. Moore SC, Lee IM, Weiderpass E, Campbell PT, Sampson JN, Kitaharaet CM et al. Association of leisure-time physical activity with risk of 26 types of cancer in 1.44 million adults. JAMA Intern Med 2016; 176: 816-25. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1548 23. Zhong S, Jiang T, Ma T, Zhang X, Tang J, Chen W, et al. Association between physical activity and mortality in breast cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur J Epidemiol 2014; 29: 391-404. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014- 9916-1 24. Colditz GA, Hankinson SE. The nurses’ health study: lifestyle and health among women. Nat Rev Cancer 2005; 5: 388-96. doi: 10.1038/nrc1608 25. Chan DS, Vieira AR, Aune D, Bandera EV, Greenwood DC, McTiernan A, et al. Body mass index and survival in women with breast cancer-systematic literature review and meta-analysis of 82 follow-up studies. Ann Oncol 2014; 25: 1901-14. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu042 26. Campbell KL, Foster-Schubert KE, Alfano CM, Wang CC, Wang CY, Duggan CR, et al. Reduced-calorie dietary weight loss, exercise, and sex hormones in postmenopausal women: randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 2314-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.9792 27. Cauley JA, Gutai JP, Kuller LH, LeDonne D, Powell JG. The epidemiology of serum sex hormones in postmenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 129: 1120-31. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115234 28. Niehoff NM, Nichols HB, Zhao S, White AJ, Sandler DP. Adult physical activ- ity and breast cancer risk in women with a family history of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2019; 28: 51-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965. EPI-18-0674 29. Ahmed Z. Risk factors in breast cancer: can we change something. MOJ Surg 2019; 7: 4-8. doi: 10.15406/mojs.2019.07.00154 30. Courneya KS, Booth CM, Gill S, O’Brien P, Vardy J, Friedenreich CM, et al. The colon health and life-long exercise change trial: a randomized trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Curr Oncol 2008; 15: 279-85. doi: 10.3747/co.v15i6.378 31. Kerr J, Anderson C, Lippman SM. Physical activity, sedentary behaviour, diet, and cancer: an update and emerging new evidence. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18: e457-71. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30411-4 32. Oruç Z, Kaplan MA. Effect of exercise on colorectal cancer prevention and treatment. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 11: 348-66. doi: 10.4251/wjgo. v11.i5.348 33. Meyerhardt JA, Ogino S, Kirkner GJ, Chan AT, Wolpin B, Ng K, et al. Interaction of molecular markers and physical activity on mortality in patients with colon cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15: 5931-36. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432. CCR-09-0496 34. Friedenreich CM, Neilson HK, Lynch BM. State of the epidemiological evidence on physical activity and cancer prevention. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 2593-604. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.07.028 35. Wolin KY, Yan Y, Colditz GA, Lee IM. Physical activity and colon cancer prevention: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2009; 100: 611-16. doi: 10.1038/ sj.bjc.6604917 36. Wolin KY, Tuchman H. Physical activity and gastrointestinal cancer preven- tion. Recent Results Cancer Res 2011; 186: 73-100. doi: 10.1007/978-3- 642-04231-7_4 37. Brown JC, Winters-Stone K, Lee A, Schmitz KH. Cancer, physical activity, and exercise. Compr Physiol 2012; 2: 2775-809. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c120005 38. Boyle T, Heyworth J, Bull F, McKerracher S, Platell C, Fritschi L. Timing and intensity of recreational physical activity and the risk of subsite-specific colorectal cancer. Cancer Causes Control 2011; 22: 1647-58. doi: 10.1007/ s10552-011-9841-5 39. Gorczyca AM, Eaton CB, LaMonte MJ, Garcia DO, Johnston JD, He K, et al. Association of physical activity and sitting time with incident colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women. Eur J Cancer Prev 2018; 27: 331-38. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.000000000000035 40. Boyle T, Fritschi L, Heyworth J, Bull F. Long-term sedentary work and the risk of subsite-specific colorectal cancer. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 173: 1183-91. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq513 41. Sanchez NF, Stierman B, Saab S, Mahajan D, Yeung H, Francois F. Physical ac- tivity reduces risk for colon polyps in a multiethnic colorectal cancer screen- ing population. BMC Res Notes 2012; 5: 312. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-312 42. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee scientific report, 2018. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2018. 43. Schmid D, Behrens G, Keimling M, Jochem C, Ricci C, Leitzmann M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of physical activity and endometrial cancer risk. Eur J Epidemiol 2015; 30: 397-412. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015- 0017-6 44. Friedenreich C, Cust A, Lahmann PH, Steindorf K, Boutron-Ruault MC, Clavel-Chapelon F, et al. Physical activity and risk of endometrial cancer: the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Int J Cancer 2007; 121: 347-55. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22676 45. Keimling M, Behrens G, Schmid D, Jochem C, Leitzmann MF. The association between physical activity and bladder cancer: systematic review and meta- analysis. Br J Cancer 2014; 110: 1862-70. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.77 Radiol Oncol 2021; 55(1): 7-17. Jurdana M / Physical activity and cancer16 46. Schmid D, Ricci C, Behrens G, Leitzmann MF. Does smoking influence the physical activity and lung cancer relation? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol 2016; 31: 1173-90. doi: 10.1007/s10654- 016-0186-y 47. Shephard RJ. Physical activity and prostate cancer: an updated review. Sports Med 2017; 47: 1055-73. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0648-0 48. Pedersen BK. Muscle as a secretory organ. Compr Physiol 2013; 3: 1337-62. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c120033 49. Hunter P. The inflammation theory of disease. The growing realization that chronic inflammation is crucial in many diseases opens new avenues for treatment. EMBO Rep 2012; 13: 968-70. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.142 50. Woods JA, Vieira VJ, Keylock KT. Exercise, inflammation, and innate im- munity. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2009; 29: 381-93. doi: 10.1016/j. iac.2009.02.011 51. Allen J, Sun Y, Woods JA. Exercise and the regulation of inflamma- tory responses. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2015; 135: 337-54. doi: 10.1016/ bs.pmbts.2015.07.003 52. Cerqueira É, Marinho DA, Neiva HP, Lourenço O. Inflammatory effects of high and moderate intensity exercise - a systematic review. Front Physiol 2020; 10: 1550. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01550 53. Neubauer O, König D, Kern N, Nics L, Wagner KH. No indications of persis- tent oxidative stress in response to an ironman triathlon. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008; 40: 2119-28. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181824dab 54. Ostrowski K, Rohde T, Asp S, Schjerling P, Pedersen BK. Pro and anti-inflam- matory cytokine balance in strenuous exercise in humans. J Physiol 1999; 515: 287-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.287ad.x 55. Balkwill F. Tumour necrosis factor and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2009; 9: 361-71. doi: 10.1038/nrc2628 56. Xia L, Tan S, Zhou Y, Lin J, Wang H, Oyang L, et al. Role of the NFκB-signaling pathway in cancer. Onco Targets Ther 2018; 11: 2063-73. doi: 10.2147/ OTT.S161109 57. Brandt C, Pedersen BK. The role of exercise-induced myokines in muscle homeostasis and the defense against chronic diseases. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010; 2010: 520258. doi: 10.1155/2010/520258 58. Scheller J, Chalaris A, Schmidt-Arras D, Rose-John S. The pro- and anti- inflammatory properties of the cytokine interleukin-6. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011; 1813: 878-88. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.01.034 59. Pedersen BK, Febbraio MA. Muscle as an endocrine organ: focus on muscle-derived interleukin-6. Physiol Rev 2008; 88: 1379-406. doi: 10.1152/ physrev.90100.2007 60. Nielsen AR, Pedersen BK. The biological roles of exercise-induced cytokines: IL-6, IL-8, and IL-15. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2007; 32: 833-39. doi: 10.1139/H07-054 61. Dufresne S, Rébillard A, Muti P, Friedenreich CM, Brenner DR. A review of physical activity and circulating miRNA expression: implications in cancer risk and progression. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018; 27: 11-24. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0969 62. Shephard RJ, Shek PN. Associations between physical activity and suscepti- bility to cancer: possible mechanisms. Sports Med 1998; 26: 293-315. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199826050-00002 63. Toyokuni S. Oxidative stress and cancer: the role of redox regulation. Biotherapy 1998; 11: 147-54. doi: 10.1023/a:1007934229968 64. Sotgia F, Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Lisanti MP. Mitochondrial oxidative stress drives tumor progression and metastasis: should we use antioxidants as a key component of cancer treatment and prevention? BMC Med 2011; 9: 62. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-62 65. Di Meo S, Venditti P. Mitochondria in exercise-induced oxidative stress. Biol Signals Recept 2001; 10: 125-40. doi: 10.1159/000046880 66. Friedenreich CM, Orenstein MR. Physical activity and cancer prevention: etiologic evidence and biological mechanisms. J Nutr 2002; 132 (11 Suppl): 3456S-64S. doi: 10.1093/jn/132.11.3456S 67. Kruk J, Aboul-Enein HY. Physical activity in the prevention of cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2006; 7: 11-21. 68. Friedenreich CM. Physical activity and breast cancer risk: the effect of men- opausal status. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2004; 32: 180-4. doi: 10.1097/00003677- 200410000-00010 69. Emaus A, Veierød MB, Furberg AS, Espetvedt S, Friedenreich C, Ellisonet PT, et al. Physical activity, heart rate, metabolic profile, and estradiol in pre- menopausal women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008; 40: 1022-30. doi: 10.1249/ MSS.0b013e318167411f 70. Kaaks R, Lukanova A. Energy balance and cancer: the role of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I. Proc Nutr Soc 2001; 60: 91-106. doi: 10.1079/ pns200070 71. Tsujimoto T, Kajio H, Sugiyama T. Association between hyperinsulinemia and increased risk of cancer death in nonobese and obese people: a population-based observational study. Int J Cancer 2017; 141: 102-11. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30729 72. Fairey AS, Courneya KS, Field CJ, Bell GJ, Jones LW, Mackey JR. Effects of exercise training on fasting insulin, insulin resistance, insulin-like growth factors, and insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003; 12: 721-27. 73. Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature 2002; 420: 860-67. doi: 10.1038/nature01322 74. Divella R, De Luca R, Abbate I, Naglieri E, Daniele A. Obesity and cancer: the role of adipose tissue and adipo-cytokines-induced chronic inflammation. J Cancer 2016; 7: 2346-59. doi: 10.7150/jca.16884 75. van Kruijsdijk RC, van der Wall E, Visseren FL. Obesity and cancer: the role of dysfunctional adipose tissue. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009; 18: 2569-78. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0372 76. Bouassida A, Chamari K, Zaouali M, Feki Y, Zbidi A, Tabka Z. Review on leptin and adiponectin responses and adaptations to acute and chronic exercise. Br J Sports Med 2010; 44: 620-30. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.046151 77. Tilg H, Moschen AR. Mechanisms behind the link between obesity and gas- trointestinal cancers. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2014; 28: 599-610. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.07.006 78. Maffei M, Halaas J, Ravussin E, Pratley RE, Lee GH, Zhang Y, et al. 1995. Leptin levels in human and rodent: measurement of plasma leptin and Ob RNA in obese and weight-reduced subjects. Nat Med 1995; 1: 1155-61. doi: 10.1038/nm1195-1155 79. Havel PJ, Kasim-Karakas S, Dubuc GR, Mueller W, Phinney SD. Gender dif- ferences in plasma leptin concentrations. Nat Med 1996; 2: 949-50. doi: 10.1038/nm0996-949b 80. Thomas T, Burguera B, Melton LJ 3rd, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, Riggs BL, et al. Relationship of serum leptin levels with body composition and sex ster- oid and insulin levels in men and women. Metabolism 2000; 49: 1278-84. doi: 10.1053/meta.2000.9519 81. Pérusse L, Collier G, Gagnon J, Leon AS, Rao DC, Skinner JS, et al. Acute and chronic effects of exercise on leptin levels in humans. J Appl Physiol 1997; 83: 5-10. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1997.83.1.5 82. Nuri R, Moghaddasi M, Darvishi H, Izadpanah A. Effect of aerobic exercise on leptin and ghrelin in patients with colorectal cancer. J Can Res Ther 2016; 12: 169-74. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.155982 83. de Salles BF, Simão R, Fleck SJ, Dias I, Kraemer-Aguiar LG, Bouskela E. Effects of resistance training on cytokines. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 441-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-125199 84. Garofalo C, Surmacz E. Leptin and cancer. J Cell Physiol 2006; 207: 12-22. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20472 85. Dalamaga M, Diakopoulos KN, Mantzoros CS. The role of adiponectin in cancer: a review of current evidence. Endocr Rev 2012; 33: 547-94. doi: 10.1210/er.2011-1015 86. Iwabu M, Okada-Iwabu M, Yamauchi T, Kadowaki T. Adiponectin/AdipoR research and its implications for lifestyle-related diseases. Front Cardiovasc Med 2019; 6: 116. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00116 87. Hou WK, Xu YX, Yu T, Zhang L, Zhang WW, Fu CL, et al. Adipocytokines and breast cancer risk. Chin Med J (Engl) 2007; 120: 1592-96. 88. Goodman B, Gardner H. The microbiome and cancer. J Pathol 2018; 244: 667-76. doi: 10.1002/path.5047 89. Zitvogel L, Galluzzi L, Viaud S, Vétizou M, Daillère R, Merad M, et al. Cancer and the gut microbiota: an unexpected link. Sci Transl Med 2015; 7: 271ps1. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3010473 Radiol Oncol 2021; 55(1): 7-17. Jurdana M / Physical activity and cancer 17 90. Eckburg PB, Bik EM, Bernstein CN, Purdom E, Dethlefsen L, Sargentet M, et al. Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science 2005; 308: 1635-38. doi: 10.1126/science.1110591 91. Welly RJ, Liu TW, Zidon TM, Rowles JL, Park YM, Smith TN, et al. Comparison of diet versus exercise on metabolic function and gut micro- biota in obese rats. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2016; 48: 1688-98. doi: 10.1249/ MSS.0000000000000964 92. Monda V, Villano I, Messina A, Valenzano A, Esposito T, Moscatelli F, et al. Exercise modifies the gut microbiota with positive health effects. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2017; 2017: 3831972. doi: 10.1155/2017/3831972 93. Peters HP, De Vries WR, Vanberge-Henegouwen GP, Akkermans LM. Potential benefits and hazards of physical activity and exercise on the gas- trointestinal tract. Gut 2001; 48: 435-39. doi: 10.1136/gut.48.3.435 94. Matsumoto M, Inoue R, Tsukahara T, Ushida K, Chiji H, Matsubara N, et al. Voluntary running exercise alters microbiota composition and increases n-butyrate concentration in the rat cecum. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2008; 72: 572-76. doi: 10.1271/bbb.70474 95. Remely M, Aumueller E, Jahn D, Hippe B, Brath H, Haslberger AG. Microbiota and epigenetic regulation of inflammatory mediators in type 2 diabetes and obesity. Benef Microbes 2014; 5: 33-43. doi: 10.3920/BM2013.006 96. Allen JM, Mailing LJ, Niemiro GM, Moore R, Cook MD, White BA, et al. Exercise alters gut microbiota composition and function in lean and obese humans. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2018; 50: 747-57. doi: 10.1249/ MSS.0000000000001495 97. McTiernan A, Friedenreich CM, Katzmarzyk PT, Powell KE, Macko R, Buchner D, et al.; 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical ac- tivity in cancer prevention and survival: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2019; 51: 1252-61. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001937