Radiol Oncol 2023; 57(3): 364-370. doi: 10.2478/raon-2023-0035 364 research article Erector spinae plane block versus intercostal nerve block for postoperative analgesia in lung cancer surgery Polona Gams 1,2 , Marko Bitenc 1 , Nenad Danojevic 1 , Tomaz Jensterle 1 , Aleksander Sadikov 3 , Vida Groznik 3,4 , Maja Sostaric 1,2,5 1 Surgery Bitenc, Thoracic Surgery Clinic, Golnik, Slovenia 2 Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 3 Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 4 Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia 5 University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia Radiol Oncol 2023; 57(3): 364-370. Received 11 December 2022 Accepted 16 January 2023 Correspondence to: Assoc. prof. Maja Šoštarič, M.D., Ph.D. Clinical Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. E-mail: maja.sostaric@kc-lj.si Disclosure: No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Background. A recent trend in postoperative analgesia for lung cancer surgery relies on regional nerve blocks with decreased opioid administration. Our study aims to critically assess the continuous ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) at our institution and compare it to a standard regional anesthetic technique, the intercostal nerve block (ICNB). Patients and methods. A prospective randomized-control study was performed to compare outcomes of pa- tients, scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lung cancer resection, allocated to the ESPB or ICNB group. Primary outcomes were total opioid consumption and subjective pain scores at rest and cough each hour in 48 h after surgery. The secondary outcome was respiratory muscle strength, measured by maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP/MEP) after 24 h and 48 h. Results. 60 patients met the inclusion criteria, half ESPB. Total opioid consumption in the first 48 h was 21.64 ± 14.22 mg in the ESPB group and 38.34 ± 29.91 mg in the ICNB group (p = 0.035). The patients in the ESPB group had lower numerical rating scores at rest than in the ICNB group (1.19 ± 0.73 vs. 1.77 ± 1.01, p = 0.039). There were no significant differences in MIP/MEP decrease from baseline after 24 h (MIP p = 0.088, MEP p = 0.182) or 48 h (MIP p = 0.110, MEP p = 0.645), time to chest tube removal or hospital discharge between the two groups. Conclusions. In the first 48 h after surgery, patients with continuous ESPB required fewer opioids and reported less pain than patients with ICNB. There were no differences regarding respiratory muscle strength, postoperative compli- cations, and time to hospital discharge. In addition, continuous ESPB demanded more surveillance than ICNB. Key words: erector spinae plane block; intercostal nerve block; postoperative analgesia; video-assisted thoracic surgery; thoracic anesthesia Introduction Post-operative analgesia is crucial for early reha- bilitation in thoracic surgery, as patients are re- quired to actively participate in respiratory physi- otherapy. 1,2 Uncontrolled pain requires high doses of opioid analgesics which should be avoided according to the Early Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines. 3 An opioid-sparing analgetic regimen is used to alleviate their numerous side Radiol Oncol 2023; 57(3): 364-370. Gams P et al. / Continuous erector spinae plane block vs. intercostal nerve block 365 effects, such as nausea, vomiting, constipation, lethargy, and respiratory depression. 4 Regional techniques have been implemented to reduce the need for opioid analgesics. 5,6 In an attempt to find safe and less invasive methods of postoperative analgesia, new tech- niques of nerve blocks have emerged. Among other peripheral blocks, intercostal nerve block (ICNB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) are being introduced in recent years. 7,8 In comparison to the neuraxial blockade, they have a lower inci- dence of spinal cord injury, epidural hematoma, and central nervous system infection. 9-11 The ICNB applied intrathoracically at the end of the surgery, is a regional technique currently used for video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) pro- cedures at our surgical center. While fairly simple to use and applied under direct vision, there are some disadvantages of the ICNB: limited time of analgesic effect, which cannot be extended by a continuous infusion, application at the end of surgery instead of pre-incision and multiple injec- tions that are needed to pertain a single block. The block cannot be executed in the presence of pleural infection, e.g., empyema. 12-14 The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) was first de- scribed by Forero et al. in 2016 as a thoracolumbar interfascial plane block for treating severe neuro- pathic pain from the ribs. 15 This interfascial nerve block is applied under ultrasound guidance and has a large safety margin. It can also be applied to patients on anticoagulant drugs. Cadaveric studies pointed out that the local anesthetic spreads to the thoracic paravertebral space 16 or epidural space 17 , whereas some stated that it spreads more lateral on the thoracic wall without passing the costotrans- verse foramen. 18 Its efficacy for thoracic surgeries in the first 24 hours after surgery as a single shot has been proven in previous studies and meta- analyses. 19-21 We compared the continuous ultrasound-guided ESPB with ICNB to evaluate their analgetic efficacy in patients after lung cancer resection, represent- ing our institution’s first study of continuous ESPB in Slovenia. We present the following article in ac- cordance with the CONSORT reporting checklist. Patients and methods The study was approved by the National Ethics Committee under the number 0120-372/2019/7 and the study was registered to the Clinical Trial Registry under number NCT04665531. Patients Sixty participants were enrolled between the 19 th of February 2020 and the 14 th of March 2022. Eligible patients with early-stage lung cancer were scheduled for VATS tumor resection with a three- port approach. 80% had lung lobe resection, 12% had marginal lung resection, and 8% had segmen- tectomy. Most of the patients had lung adenocarci- noma (72%), followed by epidermoid or squamous cell carcinoma (20%), small-cell lung carcinoma (2%), and metastasis (2%). Two tumors turned out to be benign. Other inclusion criteria were ASA status I−III and informed written consent for participation in the study. Exclusion criteria were chronic pain syndrome, chronic opioid use, weight less than 50 kg due to risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), body mass index (BMI) > 35, pregnancy or breastfeeding, allergy to local anesthetics, inflam- mation at the catheter insertion site or inability to use the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. Patients were randomly assigned to either the in- tervention ESPB arm or the comparative ICNB arm. The study protocol could not be blinded be- cause of the indiscrete intervention type. Nerve block technique Patients in the ICNB group received a single-shot intrathoracic ICNB after tumor extraction, approx- imately 30 minutes before the end of the surgery. They received 20 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine with injections at 6 intercostal spaces, adjacent to the surgical wound. The perineural intercostal space was located under direct vision. The same sur- geon performed all the surgeries and executed the ICNBs. Patients in the ESPB group received a 20 ml bolus of 0.5% levobupivacaine through the ESPB catheter approximately 30 minutes before the end of the surgery, continued by an infusion of 5 ml/h 0.2% ropivacaine with intermittent boluses of 15 ml per 4 hours. Two anesthesiologists, experienced in regional anesthesia, were inserting catheters to the pa- tients before the surgery in the pre-op area. The standard monitoring and i.v. canal were applied before the intervention. The ESPB catheter inser- tion was performed using Samsung© ultrasound with a GE 12L-RS high-frequency linear probe. Aseptic conditions were guaranteed by using ster- ile drapes, sterile probe dressings, gloves, masks, and surgical gowns. The catheter insertion un- Radiol Oncol 2023; 57(3): 364-370. Gams P et al. / Continuous erector spinae plane block vs. intercostal nerve block 366 derwent in a pronated position with the patient lightly sedated by 1−2 mcg/kg fentanyl. The inser- tion site was infiltrated with 2 ml of 2% lidocaine on the T4 level of the spine, approximately 3 cm ipsilateral from the midline on the transverse process. The needle was then inserted under ul- trasound guidance, positioning the needle tip immediately above the periosteum. The position was confirmed by injecting approximately 10 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride solution, which caused a hydro-dissection between the erector spinae muscle and the underlying fascia. Then, the catheter was inserted 4–6 cm above the needle tip. (Figure 1). After needle extraction, the catheter was secured using Stat-Lock© and multiple see-through cover- ings (Tegaderm©). Anesthesiologists used an 18G, 80 mm BD Microlance© pointed needle and a 20G Braun© multi-orifice epidural catheter. Peri-operative protocol All the patients underwent the same anesthesia protocol. Induction to general anesthesia was con- ducted with 1.5–2 mg/kg propofol 1% and 0.75–1 mcg/kg remifentanil in a slow bolus followed by 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium. Total intravenous anesthe- sia was maintained with an infusion of 5 mg/kg/h propofol 1% and 0.02–0.03 mcg/kg/min remifen- tanil. Blood pressure was maintained with fluid administration and appropriate vasoactive drugs when needed. Reversion of neuromuscular block was performed by a bolus of 2 mg/kg sugammadex at the end of the surgery. Patients were constantly monitored (ECG, pulse oximetry, invasive blood pressure) from admission to the pre-op area until at least 48 hours after sur- gery. Nurses at the intensive care unit documented the post-operative numerical rating scale for pain (NRS) every hour in the first 48 hours except when the patient was asleep. The patients expressed their current NRS on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 meaning no pain and 10 meaning the worst pain imaginable. Nurses asked the patients about their NRS at rest and at cough in the last hour, which included spontaneous and active cough but not respiratory physiotherapy. Every patient received a PCA pump with the protocol: demanded bolus 3 mg piritramide 1 mg/ ml per 15 min with a maximum of 2 boluses per hour with no continuous infusion. If the pain re- ported by a patient was still higher than 3/10, a nurse applied an additional bolus of 3 mg piri- tramide. When a patient demanded more than 4 boluses per hour, the attending doctor initiated an infusion of 2 mg/h piritramide until the pain set- tled below 3/10. All the patients received regular doses of diclofenac and metamizole in terms of multimodal analgesia. The postoperative care of the ESPB catheter fol- lowed the same protocol as for the thoracic-epidur- al catheter. The attending physician evaluated the catheter insertion site every day, looking for signs of infection. All the patients performed maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressure (MIP/MEP) tests three times: on the day of the surgery prior to the surgi- cal procedure, 24 and 48 hours later. Statistical analysis The statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS version 25, Orange data mining and visualization suite. 22 The patient and treatment characteristics were described using descriptive statistics. Demographic variables were compared with Pearson’s Chi-square test. Cumulative pi- ritramide use and NRS values are expressed as means with standard deviation. The potential dif- ferences between arms were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. All the reported p-values are two-tailed with a significance level α < 0.05. The pre-operative MIP and MEP measurements were set as baseline (100%), while the following meas- urements from the same patient were expressed FIGURE 1. Ultrasound image of the inserted ESPB catheter (marked by an arrow) and interfascial hydro-dissection. 1 – underlying thoracic lamina, 2 – m. erector spinae, 3 – m. rhomboideus, 4 – m. trapezius Radiol Oncol 2023; 57(3): 364-370. Gams P et al. / Continuous erector spinae plane block vs. intercostal nerve block 367 as percentages from the baseline. Group medians were compared with the Student’s t-test. Time to chest tube removal and hospital discharge were assessed by the median test. Results Patient allocation and follow-up are shown in the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flow diagram (Figure 2). There were no statistically significant demo- graphic differences between the study groups considering gender, age, body mass index, type of surgery, ASA and forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) (Table 1). The cumulative piritramide use in the first 48 hours after surgery was 21.64 ± 14.22 mg in the ESPB group and 38.34 ± 29.91 mg in the ICNB group (p = 0.035) (Figure 3). Figure 4 shows the cu- mulative linear graph of piritramide use in time for each group. The mean NRS scores at rest in the first 48 hours after surgery were 1.19 ± 0.73 in the ESPB group and 1.77 ± 1.01 in the ICNB group. The difference between groups is statistically significant (p = 0.039). The mean NRS scores at cough in the first 48 hours after surgery were 2.53 ± 1.23 for ESPB and 2.85 ± 0.98 for ICNB. The difference between groups is statistically insignificant (p = 0.432). There were no statistically significant differ- ences between the ESPB and ICNB groups in MIP or MEP after 24 or 48 hours (Table 2). Time to chest tube removal was 4.13 ± 2.92 days in the ESPB group vs. 3.88 ± 2.26 days in the ICNB group (p = 0.41). Time to hospital discharge was 4.43 ± 2.87 days in the ESPB group vs. 4.08 ± 2.21 days in the ICNB group (p = 0.32). There were no catheter-related complications such as clogging of the catheter, unintentional removal, or insertion-site infections. Attending physicians noted a few cases of minimal bleeding under the see-through coverings. In the ESPB group, they noted one case of par- oxysmal atrial fibrillation, one case of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, and one case of si- nus tachycardia at the time of observation. In the ICNB group, they noted 6 cases of paroxysmal FIGURE 2. CONSORT flow diagram. ESPB = erector spinae plane block; ICNB = intercostal nerve block; PCA pump = patient- controlled analgesia pump TABLE 1. Demographic data Total ESPB ICNB p-value Patients enrolled 50 25 25 Gender (male/female) 30/20 17/8 13/12 0.25 Age (years) * 69.80 ± 8.41 69.44 ± 8.20 70.2 ± 8.76 0.53 Height (cm) * 170.20 ± 8.49 172.04 ± 8.01 168.36 ± 8.72 0.15 Weight (kg) * 76.62 ± 14.07 76.24 ± 14.36 77.00 ± 14.03 0.72 BMI (kg/m 2 ) * 26.37 ± 3.93 25.72 ± 4.18 27.03 ± 3.64 0.21 ASA 1/2/3 1/25/24 0/14/11 1/11/13 0.47 FEV1 before the surgery 94.78 ± 21.57 95.45 ± 21.84 94.17 ±21.77 0.88 1 Values under age, height, weight, and BMI are given as mean and 95% confidence interval. ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists assessment; BMI = body mass index; ESPB = erector spinae plane block; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in the first second; ICNB = intercostal block Radiol Oncol 2023; 57(3): 364-370. Gams P et al. / Continuous erector spinae plane block vs. intercostal nerve block 368 atrial fibrillation. These arrhythmias emerged on postoperative day 1 or 2. 23 There were no other acute or sub-acute complications related to region- al anesthesia. Discussion This study of postoperative analgesia for VATS lung cancer resection, comparing continuous ul- trasound-guided ESPB versus ICNB, is the first of its kind in Slovenia. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic crisis, causing limited resources and additional healthcare concerns, the time of patient recruit- ment was prolonged, and only 60 patients from 200 were eligible for our study in a two-year period. The most significant findings were lower opioid demands in the ESPB group (21.64 ± 14.22 mg vs. 38.34 ± 29.91 mg (p = 0.035)) and lower cumulative NRS scores at rest in the first 48 hours after sur- gery (1.19 ± 0.73 vs. 1.77 ± 1.01, p = 0.039)) than in the ICNB group. In recent years, some studies were comparing single-shot ICNB and ESPB with unclear advantag- es. In terms of postoperative opioid use, the ICNB was reported by some studies to be more efficient and by other studies to be less efficient than the ESPB. 24,25 A previous pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial comparing continuous ESPB versus ICNB in patients undergoing VATS. 26 Our results are consistent with Fiorelli et al. 27 , who reported lower opioid consumption in the first 48 hours after surgery in the ESPB group com- pared to the ICNB group. However, they reported higher MIP and MEP in the ESPB group. Our re- sults are inconsistent with Turhan et al., who re- ported significantly lower opioid consumption in the ICNB than the ESPB group, but they observed only single-shot ESPB. 24 The mean piritramide use between the groups started to differentiate after 12 hours postopera- tively, marking the time when the ICNB effect wears out. Other observed parameters, such as time to chest tube removal, hospital discharge, and complications were similar in both groups. However, continuous ESPB is more demanding from the catheter insertion procedure to regular post-operative observations. 28 The main advantag- es of ESPB presumably come from prolonged local anesthetic administration, enabling individual ad- justments according to NRS scores. 29 Despite the continuous neuromuscular block of the hemi-thoracic musculature, the ability to fully perform respiratory physiotherapy was not com- promised by the continuous ESPB. MIP and MEP measurements decreased substantially but did not differ significantly between the two groups after 24 hours or after 48 hours. Because the absolute MIP and MEP results vary strongly in literature, TABLE 2. Maximal inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength Respiratory test values (%) ESPB ICNB p-value MIP 24 hours 71.58 ± 16.69 75.98 ± 24.04 0.088 48 hours 73.42 ± 19.10 88.11 ±30.72 0.110 MEP 24 hours 73.36 ± 20.82 85.55 ± 37.35 0.182 48 hours 74.90 ± 22.39 98.90 ± 32.29 0.645 Respiratory test values are expressed as percentages from the baseline value. ESPB = erector spinae plane block; ICNB = intercostal nerve block; MEP = maximal expiratory pressure; MIP = maximal inspiratory pressure FIGURE 3. Cumulative piritramide use in the first 48 hours after surgery. The values in the graph are marked as mean (blue), median (yellow), and interquartile range. ESPB = erector spinae plane block; ICNB = intercostal nerve block FIGURE 4. Cumulative opioid consumption in the first 48 h after surgery. The bold line shows the median values for each group. Radiol Oncol 2023; 57(3): 364-370. Gams P et al. / Continuous erector spinae plane block vs. intercostal nerve block 369 we included relative values with the patients’ pre- operative measurements as the baseline. 30-32 As common complications after lung resection, cardiac arrhythmias were monitored. 33 Clinicians detected no arrhythmias as a consequence of lo- cal anesthetic administration, showing there were no cases of local anesthetic cardiotoxicity. The ob- served arrhythmias emerged later and were attrib- uted to other post-operative factors. Comparing ESPB to a placebo without regional anesthesia would be unethical considering the benefits of regional truncal blocks that have al- ready been proven. 34 The ICNB’s efficacy has been assessed in a large meta-analysis of 66 eligible studies. 35 The ICNB is reported to be superior to systemic analgesia, non-inferior to thoracic-epi- dural anesthesia, and marginally inferior to para- vertebral block in the first 24 hours after surgery. The data suggests that the analgetic benefit of the ICNB slowly vanishes in 24 to 48 hours after sur- gery. Therefore, it is a reasonable comparison in 48 hours after surgery. The main limitation of the study is the inability to double-blind the analgesic method because of the catheter. The second limitation is the number of included patients. It would be reasonable to con- duct another study on a larger scale to see whether any other inter-group differences appear. The third limitation is the protocol for the continuous ESPB, which is subject to future changes regarding lo- cal anesthetic selection and administered volume. Ropivacaine is currently the best local anesthetic of choice because of its large safety profile and the lowest potential risk for cardiotoxicity 36 , while new anesthetics such as liposomal bupivacaine are being researched. 37 Conclusions The study in our institution showed that the con- tinuous ESPB decreases total opioid consumption and subjective pain perception at rest in the first 48 hours after V ATS lung tumor resection compared to the intrathoracic ICNB. On the other hand, ESPB de- mands more nursing care. Regarding time to chest tube removal, hospital discharge, NRS values at cough and respiratory muscle strength, there were no observed differences between ICNB and ESPB. Acknowledgments Authors would like to thank the doctors and nurs- ing staff at the Surgery Bitenc Clinic who contrib- uted to the study’s final realization. References 1. Kolettas A, Lazaridis G, Baka S, Mpoukovinas I, Karavasilis V, Kioumis I, et al. Postoperative pain management. J Thorac Dis 2015; 7(Suppl 1): S62-72. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.01.15 2. Hojski A, Leitgeb M, Crnjac A. Release of growth factors after mechanical and chemical pleurodesis for treatment of malignant pleural effusion: a randomized control study. Radiol Oncol 2015; 49: 386-94. doi: 10.1515/ raon-2015-0002 3. Batchelor TJP, Rasburn NJ, Abdelnour-Berchtold E, Brunelli A, Cerfolio RJ, Gonzalez M, et al. Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018; 55: 91-115. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy301 4. Benyamin R, Trescot AM, Datta S, Buenaventura R, Adlaka R, Sehgal N, et al. Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician 2008; 11(2 Suppl): S105-20. PMID: 18443635 5. Razi SS, Stephens-McDonnough JA, Haq S, Fabbro M 2nd, Sanchez AN, Epstein RH, et al. Significant reduction of postoperative pain and opioid analgesics requirement with an Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery protocol. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 161: 1689-701. doi: 10.1016/j. jtcvs.2019.12.137 6. Strazisar B, Besic N. Comparison of continuous local anaesthetic and sys- temic pain treatment after axillary lymphadenectomy in breast carcinoma patients - a prospective randomized study. Radiol Oncol 2013; 47: 145-53. doi: 10.2478/raon-2013-0018 7. Bendixen M, Jørgensen OD, Kronborg C, Andersen C, Licht PB. Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a ran- domised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17: 836-44. doi: 10.1016/ S1470-2045(16)00173-X 8. Baldinelli F, Capozzoli G, Pedrazzoli R, Feil B, Pipitone M, Zaraca F. Are thoracic wall blocks efficient after video-assisted thoracoscopy surgery- lobectomy pain? A comparison between serratus anterior plane block and intercostal nerve block. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021; 35: 2297-302. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.09.102 9. Tsui BCH, Fonseca A, Munshey F , McFadyen G, Caruso TJ. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block: a pooled review of 242 cases. J Clin Anesth 2019; 53: 29- 34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.036 10. Mizubuti GB, Camiré D, Ho AM, Breton S, Klar G. Erector spinae plane block when neuraxial analgesia is contraindicated by clotting abnormalities. Ann Thorac Surg 2021; 112: e245-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.01.043 11. Rawal N. Epidural technique for postoperative pain: gold standard no more? Reg Anesth Pain Med 2012; 37: 310-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP .0b013e31825735c6 12. Ahmed Z, Samad K, Ullah H. Role of intercostal nerve block in reducing postoperative pain following video-assisted thoracoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Saudi J Anaesth 2017; 11: 54-7. doi: 10.4103/1658- 354X.197342 13. Gams P , Kšela J, Šoštarič M. Regional anesthesia for cardiothoracic surgery. Signa Vitae 2023; 19: 21-9. doi: 10.22514/sv.2022.064 14. Joshi GP , Bonnet F, Shah R, Wilkinson RC, Camu F, Fischer B, et al. A system- atic review of randomized trials evaluating regional techniques for post- thoracotomy analgesia. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 1026-40. doi: 10.1213/01. ane.0000333274.63501.ff 15. Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The erector spinae plane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2016; 41: 621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP .0000000000000451 Radiol Oncol 2023; 57(3): 364-370. Gams P et al. / Continuous erector spinae plane block vs. intercostal nerve block 370 16. Bonvicini D, Boscolo-Berto R, De Cassai A, Negrello M, Macchi V, Tiberio I, et al. Anatomical basis of erector spinae plane block: a dissection and histotopographic pilot study. J Anesth 2021; 35: 102-11. doi: 10.1007/ s00540-020-02881-w 17. Adhikary SD, Bernard S, Lopez H, Chin KJ. Erector spinae plane block versus retrolaminar block: a magnetic resonance imaging and anatomical study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2018; 43: 756-62. doi: 10.1097/AAP .0000000000000798 18. Ivanusic J, Konishi Y, Barrington MJ. A cadaveric study investigating the mechanism of action of erector spinae blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2018; 43: 567-71. doi: 10.1097/AAP .0000000000000789 19. Koo CH, Lee HT, Na HS, Ryu JH, Shin HJ. Efficacy of erector spinae plane block for analgesia in thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta- analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2022; 36: 1387-95. doi: 10.1053/j. jvca.2021.06.029 20. Balzani E, Rosboch GL, Ceraolo E, Lyberis P, Filippini C, Piccioni F, et al. The effect of peripheral regional analgesia in thoracic surgery: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Tumori 2023; 109: 6-18. doi: 10.1177/03008916221081891. 21. Ciftci B, Ekinci M, Celik EC, Tukac IC, Bayrak Y, Atalay YO. Efficacy of an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia management after video-assisted thoracic surgery: a prospective rand- omized study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34: 444-9. doi: 10.1053/j. jvca.2019.04.026 22. Demšar J, Curk T, Erjavec A, Gorup Č, Hočevar T, Milutinovič M, et al. Orange: data mining toolbox in Python. J Mach Learn Res 2013; 14: 2349-53. 23. Rena O, Papalia E, Oliaro A, Casadio C, Ruffini E, Filosso PL, et al. Supraventricular arrhythmias after resection surgery of the lung. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 20: 688-93. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(01)00890-9 24. Turhan Ö, Sivrikoz N, Sungur Z, Duman S, Özkan B, Şentürk M. Thoracic paravertebral block achieves better pain control than erector spinae plane block and intercostal nerve block in thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021; 35: 2920-7. doi: 10.1053/j. jvca.2020.11.034 25. Chen N, Qiao Q, Chen R, Xu Q, Zhang Y, Tian Y. The effect of ultrasound- guided intercostal nerve block, single-injection erector spinae plane block and multiple-injection paravertebral block on postoperative analgesia in thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial. J Clin Anesth 2020; 59: 106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.07.002 26. Horth D, Sanh W, Moisiuk P , O’Hare T, Shargall Y , Finley C, et al. Continuous erector spinae plane block versus intercostal nerve block in patients under- going video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2021; 7: 56. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00801-7 27. Fiorelli S, Leopizzi G, Menna C, Teodonio L, Ibrahim M, Rendina EA, et al. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus intercostal nerve block for post-minithoracotomy acute pain management: a randomized controlled trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34: 2421-9. doi: 10.1053/j. jvca.2020.01.026 28. Nicolotti D, Iotti E, Fanelli G, Compagnone C. Perineural catheter infection: a systematic review of the literature. J Clin Anesth 2016; 35: 123-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.07.025 29. Ilfeld BM, Gabriel RA. Basal infusion versus intermittent boluses for peri- neural catheters: should we take the ‘continuous’ out of ‘continuous periph- eral nerve blocks’? Reg Anesth Pain Med 2019; 44: 285-6. doi: 10.1136/ rapm-2018-100262 30. Evans JA, Whitelaw WA. The assessment of maximal respiratory mouth pressures in adults. Respir Care 2009; 54: 1348-59. PMID: 19796415 31. Laveneziana P, Albuquerque A, Aliverti A, Babb T, Barreiro E, Dres M, et al. ERS statement on respiratory muscle testing at rest and during exercise. Eur Respir J 2019; 53: 1801214. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01214-2018 32. Sclauser Pessoa IM, Franco Parreira V, Fregonezi GA, Sheel AW, Chung F, Reid WD. Reference values for maximal inspiratory pressure: a systematic review. Can Respir J 2014; 21: 43-50. doi: 10.1155/2014/982374 33. Motono N, Ishikawa M, Iwai S, Iijima Y , Usuda K, Uramoto H. Individualization of risk factors for postoperative complication after lung cancer surgery: a retrospective study. BMC Surg 2021; 21: 311. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021- 01305-0 34. Gams P , Danojević N, Pintarič TS. [Analgesia for thoracic surgery: from epi- dural to multimodal analgesia]. [Slovenian]. Zdrav Vestn 2023; 92: 154-62. doi: 10.6016/ZdravVestn.3340 35. Guerra-Londono CE, Privorotskiy A, Cozowicz C, Hicklen RS, Memtsoudis SG, Mariano ER, et al. Assessment of intercostal nerve block analgesia for thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4: e2133394. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33394 36. Wang RD, Dangler LA, Greengrass RA. Update on ropivacaine. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2001; 2: 2051-63. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2.12.2051 37. Ilfeld BM, Eisenach JC, Gabriel RA. Clinical effectiveness of liposomal bupivacaine administered by infiltration or peripheral nerve block to treat postoperative pain. Anesthesiology 2021; 134: 283-344. doi: 10.1097/ ALN.0000000000003630