* s 4 l.ffij {.£¡,..¡1 LfiJ "'*Mtfirrft rtrtftr^fflTPTT ona innn rnaa ggnnint! n QB.jp¿fijf * Univerza v Mariboru ekonomsko-poslovna fa k ulte ta 1-2 NAŠE GOSPODARSTVO 2013 Revija za aktualna ekonomska in poslovna vprašanja NAŠE GOSPODARSTVO OUR ECONOMY Revija za aktualna ekonomska in poslovna vprašanja Journal of Contemporary Issues in Economics and Business Letnik 59, št. 1-2, 2013 Izdajatelj: Ekonomsko-poslovna fakulteta Maribor (EPF) Uredniški odbor: Mojca Duh (EPF), Matjaž Iršič (EPF), Timotej Jagrič (EPF), Milan Jurše (EPF), Iztok Kolar (EPF), Miklavž Mastinšek (EPF), Andreja Primec (EPF), Sebastjan Strašek (EPF), Karin Širec (EPF), Duško Uršič (EPF), Hans Ferk (podjetniški svetovalec, München, Nemčija), Gigi Foster (Univerza New South Wales, School of Economics) Adam Gehr (DePaul University, ZDA), Geoffrey C. Harcourt (University of Cambridge), Julius Horvath (CEU Budimpešta, Madžarska), Andras Inotai (Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Madžarska), Alessio Lokar (Universita degli Studi di Udine, Italija), Monty Lynn (Abilene Christian University, ZDA), Josef Mugler (Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien, Avstrija), Rajesh K. Pillania (Management Development Institute, Indija), Gerald Schöpfer (Karel Franzens Universität Graz, Avstrija), Jure Šimovic (Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Hrvaška). Glavna in odgovorna urednica: Majda Bastič Pomočnik glavnega in odgovornega urednika: Igor Vrečko Naslov uredništva: Maribor, Razlagova 14, Slovenija, telefon: +386 2 22 90 112 Elektronska pošta: nase.gospodarstvo@uni-mb.si Spletna stran: http://www.ng-epf.si Revija je indeksirana v ABI/INFORM Global, EconLit in ProQuest ter vključena v EBSCO in Ulrich's Periodicals bazo. Vol. 59, No. 1-2, 2013 Published by: Faculty of Economics and Business, Maribor (FEB) Editorial Board: Mojca Duh (FEB), Matjaž Iršič (FEB), Timotej Jagrič (FEB), Milan Jurše (FEB), Iztok Kolar (FEB), Miklavž Mastinšek (FEB), Andreja Primec (FEB), Sebastjan Strašek (FEB), Karin Širec (FEB), Duško Uršič (FEB), Hans Ferk (Business Advisory Board, München, Germany), Gigi Foster (University of New South Wales, School of Economics) Adam Gehr (DePaul University, USA) Geoffrey C. Harcourt (University of Cambridge), Julius Horvath (CEU Budapest, Hungary), Andras Inotai (Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary), Alessio Lokar (Universita degli Studi di Udine, Italy), Monty Lynn (Abilene Christian University, USA), Josef Mugler (Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien, Austria), Rajesh K. Pillania (Man agement Development Institute, India), Gerald Schöpfer (Karl Franzens Universität, Graz, Austria), Jure Šimovic (University of Zagreb, Croatia) Editor-in-Chief: Majda Bastič Co-editor: Igor Vrečko Editorial and administrative office address: Maribor, Razlagova 14, Slovenia, phone: +386 2 22 90 112 E-mail: nase.gospodarstvo@uni-mb.si WWW homepage: http://www.ng-epf.si The review is indexed in ABI/INFORM Global, EconLit and ProQuest. It is included in EBSCO and Ulrich's Periodicals Directories. Lektorji: mag. Darja Gabrovšek Homšak in EditAvenue Incorporated Dtp: Schwarz print, d. o. o. Letno izide: 6 (šest) številk. Letna naročnina: za pravne osebe 46 €, za fizične osebe 29 € in za tujino 57,5 €. ISSN 0547-3101 Revijo sofinancira Ministrstvo za visokošolstvo, znanost in tehnologijo Republike Slovenije. NG, št. 1-2/2013 Vsebina • Contents IZVIRNI ZNANSTVENI ČLANKI - ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS 1 Klavdij Logožar The Specifics of Supply Chain Integration with Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Posebnosti integriranja dobavne verige z malimi in srednje velikimi podjetji 3 2 Marko Cedilnik Flow of Goods across Customs Territories Pretok blaga preko meja carinsko-administrativnih območij 13 3 Dušan Jovanovič, Miha Bratina Protipravna premoženjska korist pri storitvi gospodarskih kaznivih dejanj Proceeds of Criminal Offense according to Article 240 of the Criminal Code 25 A Gorazd Šoster, Mirko Markič 4 Uporaba orodij menedžmenta in dodana vrednost v slovenskih invalidskih podjetjih The Use of Management Tools and Added Value in Slovenian Disabled Enterprises 35 5 Melita Moretti, Ivan Ropar, Adi Moretti Professional Development of Elementary School Teachers Poklicni razvoj učitelja v osnovni šoli PREGLEDNI ZNANSTVENI ČLANKI - REVIEW PAPERS 45 6 Jarmila Hojs Potočnik, Polona Tominc Povezanost strukture diplomantov terciarnega izobraževanja z gospodarsko razvitostjo -analiza evropskih držav Correlation between Tertiary Education Graduates by Field of Study and Economic Development— An analysis of European countries Vesna Čančer, Miroslav Rebernik, Jožica Knez-Riedl The Environmental Creditworthiness Assessment Methodology Metodologija presojanja okoljske bonitete 56 7 66 STROKOVNI ČLANKI - PROFESSIONAL PAPERS • Marko Kukanja, Tanja Planinc Operational Crisis Management Techniques in the Catering Industry in Times of Recession: The case of the municipality of Piran Operativne tehnike kriznega upravljanja v gostinstvu v času recesije: primer občine Piran 75 IZVIRNI ZNANSTVENI ČLANEK - ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER THE specifics of Supply cHAIN integration with small and medium-sized enterprises Posebnosti integriranja dobavne verige z malimi in srednje velikimi podjetji Prejeto/Received: November 2012 Sprejeto/Accepted: December 2012 Klavdij Logožar Univerza v Mariboru, Ekonomsko-poslovna fakulteta klavdij.logozar@uni-mb.si Abstract Although larger organizations have invested significant amounts of money to integrate their supply chains, the development of supply chain integration with small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is slow-moving. For SMEs, integration is a significant problem due to high costs and technology requirements. Hence, they follow a different approach to integrate their supply chains. Full integration of supply chains from the procurement of raw material to the distribution of finished goods is considered to be a crucial issue as nowadays the competition among enterprises is about supply chain efficiency, which is based on tighter cooperation of all partners in the supply chain process. This paper attempts to explore this topic by exploring how SMEs integrate their supply chains and by identifying the benefits of integrating supply chains. Keywords: supply chain, integration, SMEs, e-business Izvleček Čeprav so velika podjetja investirala znatne vsote denarja v integracijo svojih dobavnih verig, se integracija dobavnih verig z malimi in srednje velikimi podjetji (MSP) razvija zelo počasi. Za MSP je integracija velika težava zaradi visokih stroškov in tehnoloških zahtev. Prav zato pri integraciji svojih dobavnih verig uporabljajo drugačne pristope. Popolna integracija dobavne verige, od nabave surovin do dostave končnih izdelkov, je v današnjem času ključnega pomena, saj temelji konkurenca med podjetji na učinkovitosti dobavne verige, kar zahteva tesnejše sodelovanje vseh partnerjev v njej. V prispevku skušamo raziskati, kako MSP integrirajo svoje dobavne verige in katere so koristi, ki izvirajo iz te integracije. Ključne besede: dobavna veriga, integracija, mala in srednje velika podjetja, e-po-slovanje 1 Introduction In an increasingly international marketplace, many companies are finding that prosperity is best achieved from specialization, as opposed to diversification. Although the majority of the world's largest companies continue to provide multiple services to numerous markets, they now purchase many components and goods from smaller companies that serve one particular niche. As the global marketplace continues to develop, SMEs provide an effective tool for economic growth through participation in global supply chains. SMEs drive economic development by creating a valuable source of employment; they account for 60% to 70% of employment in OECD countries. Unfortunately, SMEs fail much more frequently in these economies. They repeatedly encounter barriers to internationalization, although several of these obstacles could be eliminated through successful integration into the international supply chain. Naše gospodarstvo / Our Economy Vol. 59, No. 1-2, 2013 pp. 3-12 DOI: 10.7549/ourecon.2013.1-2.01 UDK: 658.7:334.012.61-022.51/.55 JEL: L86, M11 Supply chain management (SCM) has increasingly become an important way to enhance competitive strength, and it is commonly argued that present-day competition is between integrated supply chains rather than among individual organizations. Studies of companies exploiting the benefits of SCM have indicated that improvements such as reduced software costs, industry-wide learning of best practices, and increased probability of having to compete against rivals enjoying the advantages of SCM are driving forces behind the adoption of the SCM concept (Arend & Wisner, 2005). The integration of key business processes among the partners in a supply chain aims at adding value for the customers. This integration is achieved by connecting suppliers, through manufacturing and assembly companies, to distributors, retailers, and customers to make the process more efficient and the product and services more differentiated. The potential benefits of SCM include product and delivery process quality such as shorter delivery times, more reliable delivery promises, fewer schedule disruptions, significant reductions in inventories, and risk reductions (Bask & Juga, 2001). Furthermore, the integration of processes in the supply chain can also enhance the ability to leverage its scalable competences, such as the enforcement of innovative product design and radical process innovation, and to access complementary partner assets (Arend & Wisner, 2005). Despite the lack of an agreed-upon definition, SCM is generally intended to cover all business processes between vertically linked organizations. Our understanding of SCM as discussed in this paper defines SCM as the integration of key business processes from end user to original suppliers that provide products and services and information that add value to customers and other stakeholders (Lambert, Cooper, & Pagh, 1998). The ability to develop and maintain sound business relationships across company boundaries is an important issue when managing a supply chain. It is therefore essential to recognize the power structures that exist between buyer and seller—or what Cox, Watson, Lonsdale, and Sanderson (2004) refer to as the "power resources" in the transactions. Only by understanding the existing power regime can buyers and suppliers manage relationships in an appropriate manner. Dominant players are able to direct or gain access to all crucial resources in a supply chain structure of dominance and dependency. A supply chain includes several focal organizations. In other words, the customer (with the exception of the end user) is also a supplier, and any supplier—except for the very first link in the chain—is also a customer. Every focal organization has its own supply chain and, hence, represents a complex network rather than a conventional chain. From this perspective, it is highly relevant to focus on cooperation among several parties in the network. Over the past years, many large and medium-sized companies have made major efforts to create electronic con- nections with their major suppliers. Despite considerable success with suppliers that can afford the up-front investments in computer systems and business applications, these buying organizations face a series of technical difficulties together with an expanding set of day-to-day operational challenges. They need to eliminate paper-based business processes while also addressing the requirements of small and medium-sized suppliers that do not have the resources to manage their own electronic supply chain. Many large and medium-sized manufacturers have yet to launch an electronic supply chain initiative and continue to rely on paper-driven business processes. With the broad use of the web and integration technologies in business environments, manufacturers now have a viable set of options for substantially reducing paper-driven business processes from its supply chain and for incorporating all of its suppliers into an electronic supply chain network to increase efficiency. Despite the substantial benefits of SCM, it is also evident that SCM implementation has its costs, hazards, and challenges. Furthermore, there are indications that small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are less able to harness the benefits of SCM or encounter greater obstacles when trying to introduce SCM practices. Integration is frequently cited as being an important issue for organizations (Daniel 2003). Integration problems affect all types of organizations, including SMEs, as enterprises are trying to integrate their applications at both the intra- and inter-organizational levels. Large organizations are turning to the adoption of integrated systems as a strategy to improve their competitiveness. For SMEs, integration is a significant problem due to its high cost, technical requirement, limited financial resources, and lack of technical knowledge. Hence, SMEs have different approaches toward integration (Chen, Themistocleous, & Chiu, 2003). Although some SMEs are moving to the adoption of integrated systems, the rate of integration technology adoption is generally low among SMEs (Buonanno et al., 2005; Hughes, Golden, & Powell, 2003; Pigni, Ravarini, Buonanno, & Sciuto, 2011). SMEs are not only seeking ways to integrate the disparate systems within the organization, but have also moved to extend the whole domain beyond the boundaries of the organization to include their suppliers, trading partners, and customers (Butler et al., 2002; IDB, 2010). This has also affected the supply chain. SMEs might need to integrate their IT infrastructure so as to support the efficiency of their supply chains. Integrating SMEs' systems with their customers and trading partners will give them even greater competitive advantages to compete with their competitors, including larger companies (Chen et al., 2003). The emergence of supply chain integration is therefore undoubtedly a critical component to strengthen the competitive advantage of both suppliers and their customers. It is believed that, in today's world of competitive business, it is no longer companies that compete, but supply chains. 2 Supply Chain Integration through E-Collaboration The goal of supply chain integration is to improve the efficiency with which a company buys, sells, and produces materials or services, inherently reducing the costs associated with these activities (and thus increasing profits). Various studies have been conducted to understand the reasons why organizations adopt or do not adopt information technologies in their supply chain. Kaynak, Tatoglu, and Kula (2005) found that the perceived benefits, such as market development, efficiency of sales and promotion, ease of accessibility, and cost reduction, are able to influence organizations' e-business adoption decisions. Grandon and Pearson (2004) found that organizational readiness, external pressure, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness affect the adoption of e-commerce. According to Thatcher, Foster, and Zhu (2006), organizational, industrial, governmental, and cultural factors play key roles in organizations' e-commerce adoption decisions. Joo and Kim (2004) demonstrated that external pressure and organizational size both have positive relationships with organizational adoption of e-marketplaces. These studies showed that the majority of the e-commerce adoption factors determined in past research can be summarized into technological, environmental, and organizational factors. These results are consistent with the technology-organization-environment (TOE) model proposed by Tornatzky and Fleischer (1990). However, as the web becomes increasingly common in organizations, the TOE model by itself might no longer be able to explain organizations' e-collaboration tool-adoption decisions fully. For example, technological attributes such as compatibility might not be an issue for organizations, as the internet is based on consistent standards. Instead, Chong, Ooi, Lin, and Raman (2009a) and Huang, Janz, and Frolick (2008) all proposed that factors such as inter-organizational relationships (IOR) play a prominent role in affecting the inter-organizational system adoption decisions of organizations. Supply chain members will only benefit from e-collaboration tool implementation if they are integrating important business processes in the supply chain. Such integrations will allow them to have an agile, seamless supply chain that can respond to the fast-changing and unpredictable market. The implementation of e-col-laboration tools to facilitate these supply chain integrations will also involve the sharing of key supply chain information. This might be a challenge for organizations, especially SMEs who are protective of their business information. Another issue to consider is that, although adoption is an organization's decision, ultimately the users of the system will play a crucial role in determining the success of e-col-laboration diffusion. In addition to TOE and IOR, an important area of research that has been discarded by most e-collaboration tool and SCM researchers is the users' perceptions of the technology. This is an important gap that has been high- lighted by Jeyaraj, Rottma, and Lacity's (2006) studies. Jeyaraj et al. (2006) stated that it is important to include the characteristics of users as they play a decisive role on whether the organization can successfully assimilate e-col-laboration tools. Studies on technology adoptions from the users' perspectives are common among standalone internet technologies such as e-mail (Straub, Keil, & Brenner, 1997), short messaging service (Brown, Dennis, & Venkatesh, 2010), and online shopping (Gefen, Karahanna, & Straub, 2003). Most of these studies have adopted the technology acceptance model (TAM) (Davis, 1989). TAM posits that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of the technology will influence the users' adoption decisions. Although a popular model, TAM is sometimes criticized for being too simple to explain a wide range of technologies or adoption situations (Bagozzi, 2007). An alternate model built on TAM's foundation is the UTAUT model (Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis, 2003). UTAUT examines both the users' intentions to use a technology and the subsequent actual usage. By combining eight models that earlier research had employed to study technology adoption (e.g., theory of reasoned action, TAM, motivational model), Venkatesh et al. (2003) consolidated four main constructs that have significant influence on the adoption and usage of technology: performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions. The UTAUT model was employed by Brown et al. (2010) in their study on collaboration technology usage. The three models discussed thus far complement each other as they cover the environmental factors faced by organizations in a supply chain environment (e.g., competitive pressure), the IOR among supply chain members (e.g., partner's power, willingness to share information), and the diffusion decisions by the organizations' users (e.g., social influence). Another area that has attracted the attention of researchers is the study of collaborative SCM (Chong, Ooi, Lin, & Tang, 2009; Kioses, Pramatari, Doukidis, & Bardaki, 2007). Cohen and Roussel (2005) defined collaboration as the means by which supply chain members work together to achieve mutual objectives by sharing ideas, information, knowledge, risks, and rewards. Supply chain members in the collaborative SCM environment will therefore work together, have common objectives, share important information, and collaborate on supply chain activities (Chong, Ooi, Lin, et al., 2009; Serve, Yen, Wang, & Lin, 2002). Although the concept of collaboration in SCM has long existed, its practicality in terms of its abilities to integrate supply chain members was much easier to achieve with the emergence of internet technologies (Frohlich & Westbrook, 2002). With the internet, organizations are able to integrate their inter- and intra-organizational business processes within functional departments and supply chain members via e-collaboration tools. Chong Chong, Ooi, Lin, et al. (2009) defined e-collaboration as business-to-business interactions facilitated by the use of internet technologies. Unlike existing technologies, such as the electronic data interchange (EDI), the interactions in e-collaboration moved from buying and selling transactions to relationship building based on activities such as information sharing and integration, shared decision making, and process and resource sharing (Chong, Ooi, Lin, et al., 2009). E-collaboration is defined as electronically enabled collaborative tools that facilitate interactions between an organization and its suppliers, trading partners, customers, and employees. E-collaboration tools leverage the internet to create and maintain an interactive business community of employees, trading partners, suppliers, and customers (Chong, Ooi, & Sohal, 2009). Unlike B2B, e-collaboration tools do not focus on monetary transactions in B2B; instead, they cover the exchanges of information and ideas between the trading organizations and within organizations, which allows them to collaboratively design, develop, build, and manage products through their life cycle. With e-collabora-tion, supply chain partners are able to automate information flows within a multi-channel distribution network (Chong, Ooi, & Sohal, 2009). Cassivi (2006) identified eight e-collaboration tools used to exchange critical information among supply chain partners. These supply chain e-collaboration tools are categorized as supply chain planning or supply chain execution tools (Table 1). Supply chain planning tools are supply chain forecasting, capacity planning, and business strategy tools, while supply chain execution tools are direct procurement, replenishment, projected shortages, delivery and tracking, and design. 3 Specifics of Supply Chain Integration with SMEs SCM is perceived by SMEs differently. Several studied have shown that SMEs do not perceive their suppliers to be their partners, as big firms do; rather, they perceive them to be a process that protects them against a lack of production (Udomleartpresert, Jungthirapanich, & Sommechai, 2003). SMEs do not have bargaining power against big enterprises. In order to increase SMEs' bargaining power and relationships with customers, a vertical supply chain is proposed to SMEs to be able to implement a win-win strategy. In the vertical chain model, the aim is to maximize bilateral benefits with suppliers in the chain and gain bargaining power over suppliers through the establishment of a union by SMEs operating in the same sector. SCM provides benefits of vertical integration without reflecting them in the costs. As the size of the enterprise is not taken into consideration in most of the studies on supply chain management, there is no sufficient research on to what extent SCM fits SMEs and whether it is right to implement exactly the same SCM implemented on larger enterprises on SMEs. Arend and Wisner (2005) investigated to what extent small enterprises fit supply chains' application. They found that SMEs do not implement SCM correctly, use SCM strategies fully, or select SCM freely. In fact, there is a weak harmony between SMEs and SCM. It was concluded that SMEs are more willing to use supply chains after they begin using their suppliers' EDI system. The use of technologies helps organizations better manage their supply chains, as supply chain management applications built on technology platforms have enhanced the ability of organizations to integrate their processes through collaborative information sharing and planning (Chan, Chung, & Zhou, 2012; Hafeez, Keoy, Zairi, Hanneman, & Koh, 2010). With supply chain integration, companies anticipate customers' desires and meet their demands. Having too many goods in stock creates unnecessary expenses and risks, especially when goods do not sell as quickly as expected. When the goods are held in inventory for too long, they age and will be easily replaced by newer goods. As a result, those aged goods will be sold at comparatively low prices and the companies will possibly end up with losses. However, having too few goods in stock also drags down profits as impatient customers will prefer to take their business elsewhere rather than wait for orders to arrive. For retailers and manufacturers alike, a company's competitive advantage depends in large measure on the adaptability and agility of its supply chain (Iyer, Germain, & Claycomb, 2009; Lu, Zhao, & Chi, 2012). Table 1: Supply Chain E-Collaboration Tools Supply chain planning Forecasting Exchanges the forecast information provided by both the buyer and supplier Capacity planning Determines the amount of capacity required to produce Business strategy Collects and shares the actions that need to be taken to support the objectives and mission of the supply chain Supply chain execution Direct procurement Forwards purchase orders to pre-qualified suppliers Replenishment Orders directly from the shop floor to either replenish a production line or a stockroom Shortages Scans the buyer's production plan to project expected component shortages Delivery and tracking Generates a payment and a delivery request to track components Design Enables the use of interactive engineering drawing and storage of CAD designs by all key stakeholders Source: Cassivi, 2006 A competitive company has to have the ability to acquire the goods and services it needs exactly when and where it needs them, at a favorable price, and with acceptable payment and delivery terms. It needs to directly manage the flow of goods through its distribution networks in a cost-effective manner. Not only large companies, but also SMEs have come to realize that they can achieve this by integrating their supply chains. Implementing supply chain integration can be a cost-saving step for the company in many ways. It can lower the costs of labor, increase flexibility, achieve faster response times and cut down the occurrence of errors on paper based operation, reduce unauthorized buying outside preferred supplier agreements, and reduce inventory, thereby achieving a competitive advantage (Chang & Wong, 2010; Essig & Arnold, 2001; Lee & Whang, 2004). Automation processes can also shorten the cycle time from ordering to distribution, thereby resulting in enhanced production ability and increased efficiency. Suppliers can also benefit from supply chain integration as this will shorten the business transaction cycle, lower tied capital in inventory, lower labor costs, increase efficiency, enhance accuracy, and make handling time and delivery speed faster (Chen et al., 2003; Khang, Arumugam, Chong, & Chan, 2010). Although many efforts have been made by large companies to use integration technologies to support their supply chain integration strategy, there are still problems. As most organizations' suppliers are SMEs whose abilities and resources are limited, they might want to protect their proprietary process knowledge and competitive advantages from larger companies; they also might wish to have unrestricted control of their own assets. Therefore, integrating systems with their buying organizations seems to be a significant problem for them. The supply chain cannot be efficiently integrated without the support of and cooperation from the suppliers. Using new technology to support the integration of the supply chains is much harder for SMEs due to their characteristic weaknesses from the larger organizations (e.g., lack of financial resources and technological ability). The maturity of integration technologies and the lack of cases in integration technologies adoption in SMEs have made the problem even worse for them and, therefore, the rate of adoption among SMEs is understandably low. Vaaland and Heide (2007) found a considerable technology gap between large and small companies as virtually all methods for planning and control are electronically based. The indifference of SMEs with regard to technological issues might provide a competitive advantage to large enterprises, which tend to give higher priority to employing technology-based methods to reduce transactional costs and introduce new and more effective material and process technologies. The result might be that SMEs will lose their competitive strength. SMEs might be more flexible than larger companies, but can easily be outdistanced by larger companies with efficient transaction systems (e.g., e-business) and state-of-the-art production technology. A company's willingness to integrate advances in information and communication technologies will largely determine, for example, its ability to develop direct deliveries. Consequently, it is difficult to see how SMEs can survive if they continue to underestimate the importance of e-commerce. Despite these observations, it is possible to overstate the importance of technology for SMEs. A final point on the question of the importance of technology is that stressing the need for technological awareness does not necessarily imply that SMEs must control or own access to that technology. Through network collaboration and the sharing of resources, the cost of acquiring new technology can be minimized. The main barriers to supply chain information integration are the lack of strategic alignment of information strategies in the chain, firm size of some supply chain actors, the lack of awareness of potential benefits of e-business, the lack of motivation, and a less developed industry or regional context (Harland, Caldwell, Powell, & Zheng, 2007). Bask and Juga (2001) proposed that the polarization of strategies in supply chains can lead to separation and give rise to semi-integration rather than the full integration of information. There are challenges in cooperation among firms to achieve the necessary changes in business culture, in part stemming from the diverse goals of the parties involved and unequal risk and rewards (Boddy, Cahill, Charles, Fraser-Kraus, & Macbeth, 1998). Fisher (1997) suggested that supply chains can be managed according the nature of the product being supplied, such as "innovative" products and "functional" products. As this suggests differences in management according to product type, it is reasonable to conclude this might explain differences in management through the adoption of information technologies. Functional products include the staples that people buy in a wide range of retail outlets, such as grocery stores and gas stations. Because such products satisfy basic needs, which do not change much over time, they have a stable, predictable demand and long life cycles. But their stability invites competition, which often leads to low profit margins. To avoid low margins, many companies introduce innovations in fashion or technology to give customers an additional reason to buy their offerings. Fashion apparel and personal computers are obvious examples, but we also see successful product innovation where we least expect it. Although innovation can enable a company to achieve higher profit margins, the very newness of innovative products makes demand for them unpredictable. In addition, their life cycle is short, usually just a few months, because as imitators erode the competitive advantage that innovative products enjoy, companies are forced to introduce a steady stream of newer innovations. The short life cycles and the great variety typical of these products further increase unpredictability. Harland, Lamming, Zheng, and Johnsen (2001) identified two dimensions that have substantial impact on how firms have attempted to manage the process of creation and the operation of supply networks: the degree of dynamics and the degree of focal firm supply network influence. The combination of the two dimensions provides four types of supply networks (Figure 1), each containing different problems, priorities, and core activities as well as showing differences in the focus on information integration according to type: Highly routinized supply networks highly influenced by a focal firm are more likely to integrate information into the network. The literature review shows that most authors claim that benefits exist to achieving and utilizing supply chain integration through information integration. It is also stressed that the greatest benefits of e-business occur when its application is fully integrated throughout the chain. However, the empirical evidence to support this one-size-fits-all assertion is insufficient. Even large organizations, some with reputations for advanced supply chain management, appear not to be concerned with the integration of information into their supply chains (Harland, Caldwell, et al., 2007). This finding raises a real doubt as to the strength and reliability of some of the more advanced claims for supply chain management or, more cautiously, speculation that supply chain approaches are still limited largely to their logistical roots, rather than IT development; it could be that integrated information systems might only be appropriate in certain types of supply chains or within certain parts of supply chains. Customer dominance and pressure are key drivers for SMEs to adopt e-business; if customers are not pressur- ing the organization, then this acts as an inhibitor to SMEs pursuing e-business. Therefore, the "e-isolation" of e-business strategy development in the larger downstream firms in the supply chains does not motivate the upstream SMEs to join in. If downstream, more powerful customers forced them to do so, they would implement e-business technologies; however, they will not in the absence of this pressure. Das, Narasimhan, and Talluri (2006) stated that optimum supply chain performance will only be achieved through appropriate supply chain integration. They suggested that it is possible to overinvest in supply chain integration, giving rise to suboptimal performance. Rather, they propose a "balanced approach" to supplier integration, with a mid-range position. They suggested that different shapes of configuration of information integration might be appropriate to specific industry and market environments. E-business should be adopted in a manner contingent to the specific organization—namely, that large and small firms will have different objectives and different strategies. Koh and Maguire (2004) extended this thinking into specific ebusiness applications, highlighting that ERP is less appropriate for SMEs who wish to integrate tacit and cultural knowledge than for larger firms that integrate volumes of explicit knowledge. Some parts of supply chains dealing with routinized, high volume requirements might usefully employ e-business based information integration, whereas others dealing with more dynamic, innovative activities might seek integration of a richer sort of information in more tacit forms. Figure 1: A taxonomy of supply networks Dynamic Supply Network Routinised Supply Network Motivating Low Degree of Focal Firm Supply Network Influence Human Resource Integration Motivating Product/Technological Innovation Demand Management Problems - Buffer Stocks Coping with Network Equipment Integration Process Innovation/ Operational Improvement Stock Minimization Coping with Network Risk and Benefit Sharing Knowledge Capture Risk and Benefit Sharing Information Processing Partner Selection High Degree of Focal Firm Supply Network Influence Human Resource Integration Partner Selection Equipment Integration Product/Technological Innovation Demand Management Problems - Buffer Stocks Managing Network Decision-making Process Innovation/ Operational Improvement Stock Minimization Managing Network Knowledge Capture Decision-making Information Processing Source: Harland, Lamming, et al., 2001 It appears that larger firms have to be smarter in their e-business initiatives, differentiating between chains and within chains on the type of information they wish to integrate and how they achieve this (Harland, Caldwell, et al., 2007). Within chains, if SMEs are to remain strongly connected, this cannot easily be devolved to intermediaries such as e-exchanges as SME engagement with them is low. It also cannot be easily passed over as a black box technology without support. Rather, larger firms need to build appropriate information integration bridges to smaller supply chain members, which might require using different technologies that enhance the flows and capture of tacit, informal information. Strong bridges to SMEs would carry mutual trust. Trust toward the trading partner is a major factor leading firms to share knowledge with partners (Ke & Wei, 2006). 4 Conclusion Conflict exists over how SCM affects SMEs. On one hand, SCM can provide quality, cost, customer service, leverage, and even risk reduction benefits for the SME. On the other hand, SCM exposes the SME to greater management and control hazards while reducing its private differentiation advantages. True vertical integration is generally not an option for the SME; SMEs are unlikely to need to consider antitrust implications in their alliances; SMEs are more vulnerable to holding specific assets and more sensitive to contract costs; SMEs are usually in a worse bargaining position; SMEs have less reputation, instilling less trust, due to newness; SMEs face greater spillover problems as their advantages are more knowledge and product based and there are likely to be cultural differences between SMEs and larger enterprises. Different authors have demonstrated that a considerable gap exists between larger enterprises and SMEs in nearly all aspects of current and future SCM-related methods. If this gap is not reduced, SMEs are likely to lose transaction efficiency compared to their larger counterparts. Compared with larger enterprises, SMEs are less satisfied with the methods applied today and less optimistic about the future requirement fit. They are less concerned with methods supporting SCM on product quality, rationalization of operations, and capital cost rationalization. SMEs are also less focused on system integration with other actors in the supply chain; and less centered on EDI and e-based solutions both upstream and downstream the supply chain. Generally, larger companies expect their business to be more technology driven in the years to come whereas SMEs expect less change. In conclusion, SMEs appear to be far behind in the technology and system adoption that is considered vital to sustain SCM implementation. Thus, SMEs face a significant risk of losing competitive power. SMEs seem to be lagging far behind larger companies in terms of competing by means of effective supply chains. Many developing countries are plagued by an insufficient business infrastructure. Telecommunications systems are outdated or cost-prohibitive to most SMEs, technologies are antiquated, and access to the internet is often nonexistent. Developing a stronger, modernized infrastructure dramatically improves the capability of SMEs within these countries to trade internationally. Moreover, specific development of an internet-capable landscape, which offers instant access to a global network of consumers and producers, can enhance SME participation in international supply chains and the global marketplace. The presence of transnational corporations (TNCs) provides a critical means through which SMEs can specialize and carve out a niche in the international supply chain (also known as a backward linkage). Integrating with TNCs will help SMEs when joining international supply chains. However, the technology is only one part of the story. Those who wish to create e-business-enabled supply chains must appreciate and support the business models of chain actors and participants, which vary by size of chain actor and position in the supply chain. A traditional operations management focus on the component parts of the supply process will fail to deliver supply chain integration if strategies in the chain are not aligned. It is likely that some information integration bridges to and within supply chains should carry education, training, and investment support to strengthen ties with critical smaller firms. SMEs have a reputation as boosters of employment, economic growth, and economic dynamics. One of the most important means through which SMEs are able to make these contributions is their ability to realize innovations. Therefore, in both developed and developing countries, many efforts have been made during the last few decades to stimulate SMEs to realize innovations. SMEs have been encouraged to make use of funding schemes and to utilize the services of knowledge centers. However, despite these efforts, knowledge is lacking about the nature and extent of SME support needs and the mechanisms for delivering it effectively. This holds true for supply chain integration needs as well. 5 References 1. Arend, R. J., & Wisner, J. D. (2005). Small business and supply chain management: Is there a fit? Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 403-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/jjbusvent2003.1L003 2. Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 244-254. 3. Bask, A. H., & Juga, J. (2001). Semi-integrated supply chains: Toward the new era of supply chain management. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 4(2), 137-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13675560110059434 4. Boddy, D., Cahill, C., Charles, M., Fraser-Kra-us, H., & Macbeth, D. K. (1998). Success and failure in implementing supply chain partnering: An empirical study. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 4(2-3), 143-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0969-7012(97)00026-9 5. Brown, S. A., Dennis, A. R., & Venkatesh, V. (2010). Predicting collaboration technology use: Integrating technology adoption and collaboration research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(2), 9-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270201 6. Buonanno, G., Faverio, P., Pigni, F., Ravarini, A., Sciuto, D., & Tagliavini, M. (2005). Factors affecting ERP system adoption: A comparative analysis between SMEs and large companies. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(4), 384-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410390510609572 7. Butler, M., Jones, T., Charlesworth, I., Hamilton, L., Holden, J., Holt, M., ... Jennings, T. (2002). EAI and web Services: Cutting the cost of enterprise integration. Technology evaluation and comparison report. Hull, Yorkshire, UK: Butler Group Limited. 8. Cassivi, L. (2006). Collaboration planning in a supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(3), 249-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13598540610662158 9. Chan, F. T. S., Chong, A. Y.-L., & Zhou, L. (2012). An empirical investigation of factors affecting e--collaboration diffusion in SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 138(2), 329-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.04.004 10. Chang, H. H., & Wong, K. H. (2010). Adoption of e--procurement and participation of e-marketplace on firm performance: Trust as a moderator. Information & Management, 47(5-6), 262-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.05.002 11. Chen, H., Themistocleous, M., Chiu, K.-H. (2003). Inte-rorganisational application integration: The case of 15 of Taiwan's SMEs. Proceedings of ISOneWorld Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. 12. Chong, A. Y.-L., Ooi, K.-B., Lin, B., & Raman, M. (2009). Factors affecting the adoption level of c-commerce: An empirical study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(2), 13-22. 13. Chong, A. Y.-L., Ooi, K.-B., Lin, B., & Tang, S. Y. (2009). Influence of interorganizational relationships on SMEs' e-business adoption. Internet Research, 19(3), 313-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10662240910965379 14. Chong, A. Y.-L., Ooi, K.-B., & Sohal, A. (2009). The relationship between supply chain factors and adoption of e-collaboration tools: An empirical examination. Interna- tional Journal of Production Economics, 122(1), 150-160. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.05.012 15. Cohen, S., & Roussel, J. (2005). Strategic supply chain management: The five disciplines for top performance. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. 16. Cox, A., Watson, G., Lonsdale, C., & Sanderson, J. (2004). Managing appropriately in power regimes: Relationship and performance management in 12 supply chain cases. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(5), 357-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13598540410560748 17. Daniel, E. (2003). An exploration of the inside-out model: E-commerce integration in UK SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(3), 233-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14626000310489691 18. Das, A., Narasimhan, R., & Talluri, S. (2006). Supplier integration—Finding an optimal configuration. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 563-582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.09.003 19. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249008 20. Essig, M., & Arnold, U. (2001). Electronic procurement in supply chain management: An information economics-based analysis of electronic markets. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37(4), 43-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2001.tb00112.x 21. Fisher, M. L. (1997). What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard Business Review, 75(2), 105-116. 22. Frohlich, M. T., & Westbrook, R. (2002). Demand chain management in manufacturing and services: Web-based integration, drivers and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 20(69), 729-745. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00037-2 23. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90. 24. Grandon,E.E.,&Pearson,J.M. (2004).Electroniccommerce adoption: An empirical study of small and medium US businesses. Information & Management, 42(1), 197-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.12.010 25. Hafeez, K., Keoy, K. H. A., Zairi, M., Hanneman, R., & Koh, S. C. L. (2010). E-supply chain operational and behavioural perspectives: An empirical study ofMalaysian SMEs. International Journal of Production Research, 48(2), 525-546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207540903175079 26. Harland, C. M., Caldwell, N. D., Powell, P., & Zheng, J. (2007). Barriers to supply chain information integration: SMEs adrift of e-lands. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1234-1254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/jjom.2007.0L004 27. Harland, C. M., Lamming, R. C., Zheng, J., & Johnsen, T. E. (2001). A taxonomy of supply network. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37(4), 21-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2001.tb00109.x 28. Huang, Z., Janz, B. D., & Frolick, M. N. (2008). A comprehensive examination of Internet-EDI adoption. Information Systems Management, 25(3), 273-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10580530802151228 29. Hughes, M., Golden, W., & Powell, P. (2003). Inter-organisational ICT systems: The way to innovative practice for SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(3), 277-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14626000310489754 30. IDB—Industrial Development Bureau, Ministry of Economic Affairs. (2010). 2010 Industrial Development In Taiwan, R.O.C. Taipei, Taiwan: Author. 31. Iyer, K. N. S., Germain, R., & Claycomb, C. (2009). B2B e-commerce supply chain integration and performance: A contingency fit perspective on the role of environment. Information & Management, 46(6), 313-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016Zj.im.2009.06.002 32. Jerman, D., & Zavrsnik, B. (2012a). The model ofmarketing communications effectiveness: Empirical evidence from Slovenian business-to-business practice. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(4), 705-723. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2011.620163 33. Jerman, D., & Zavrsnik, B. (2012b). The role of social networks for business in the marketing communications. Analele çtiintifice ale Universitœafii "Al.I Cuza" din Ia§i. §tiinte economice, 59, 155-168. 34. Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J. W., & Lacity, M. C. (2006). A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research. Journal of Information Technology, 21(1), 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000056 35. Joo, Y.-B., & Kim, Y.-G. (2004). Determinants of corporate adoption of e-Marketplace: An innovation theory perspective. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 10(2), 89-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2004.01.001 36. Kaynak, E., Tatoglu, E., & Kula, V. (2005). An analysis of the factors affecting the adoption of electronic commerce by SMEs: Evidence from an emerging market. International Marketing Review, 22(6), 623-640. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02651330510630258 37. Ke, W., & Wei, K. K. (2007). Factors affecting trading partners' knowledge sharing: Using the lens of transaction cost economics and socio-political theories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6(3), 297-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2006.06.006 38. Khang, T. S., Arumugam, V., Chong, A. Y.-L., & Chan, F. T. S. (2010). Relationship between supply chain management practices and organisation performance: A case study in the Malaysian service industry. International Journal of Modelling in Operations Management, 1(1), 84-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJM0M.2010.035256 39. Kioses, E., Pramatari, K., Doukidis, G., & Bardaki, C. (2007). Measuring the business value of electronic supply chain collaboration: The case of electronic invoicing. Bled 2007 Proceedings, Paper 53. 40. Koh, S. C. L., & Maguire, S. (2004). Identifying the adoption of e-business and knowledge management within SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11(3), 338-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14626000410551591 41. Lambert, D. J., Cooper, M. C., & Pagh, J. D. (1998). Supply chain management: Implementation issues and research opportunities. International Journal of Logistics Management, 9(2), 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09574099810805807 42. Lee, H. L., & Whang, S. (2004). E-business and supply chain integration. In T. P. Harrison, H. L. Lee, & J. J. Neale (Eds.), The practice of supply chain management: Where theory and application converge (pp. 123-138). New York: Springer-Verlag. 43. Lu, Z., Zhao, J., & Chi, M. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of e-supply chain coordination capability for enterprises: An empirical study in China. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 10(3/4), 361-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJNVO.2012.046457 44. Pigni, F., Ravarini, A., Buonanno, G., & Sciuto, D. (2011). Interorganisational systems within SMEs aggregations: An exploratory study on information requirements of an industrial district. International Journal of Information Technology and Management, 10(2/3/4), 208-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJITM.2011.042588 45. Serve, M., Yen, D. C., Wang, J.-C., & Lin, B. (2002). B2B-enhanced supply chain process: Toward building virtual enterprises. Business Process Management Journal, 8(3), 245-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14637150210428952 46. Straub, D., Keil, M., & Brenner, W. (1997). Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study. Information & Management, 33(1), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(97)00026-8 47. Thatcher, S., Foster, W., & Zhu, L. (2006). B2B e-commerce adoption decisions in Taiwan: The interaction of cultural and other institutional factors. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 5(2), 92-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2005.10.005 48. Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. New York: Lexington Books. 49. Udomleartprasert, P., Jungthirapanich, C., & Sommechai, C. (2003). Supply chain management—SMEs approach. Engineering Management Conference, 2003. IEMC '03. Managing Technologically Driven Organizations: The Human Side of Innovation and Change (pp. 345-349). 50. Vaaland, T. I., & Heide, M. (2007). Can the SME survive the supply chain challenges? Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(1), 20-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13598540710724374 51. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. Klavdij Logožar, PhD, is an associate professor of international economics and business logistics at the University of Maribor, Faculty of Economics and Business, and head of the Institute for Transport and Business Logistics. His scientific and professional interests include supply chain management, reverse logistics, improvement of logistics processes, and logistics cost reduction. He has more than a decade of experience as a researcher and consultant and has published original scientific papers in domestic and foreign scientific journals. Klavdij Logožar, doktor znanosti, je izredni profesor za znanstveno področje mednarodne ekonomije in poslovne logistike na Ekonomsko-poslovni fakulteti Univerze v Mariboru in predstojnik Inštituta za transport in poslovno logistiko. Področja, s katerimi se znanstveno in strokovno ukvarja, vključujejo menedžment dobavnih verig, razbremenilno logistiko, izboljšave logističnih procesov ter zniževanje logističnih stroškov. Že več kot desetletje deluje kot raziskovalec in svetovalec ter objavlja izvirne znanstvene članke v domačih in tujih znanstvenih revijah. IZVIRNI ZNANSTVENI ČLANEK - ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER FLOW OF GOODS ACROSS CUSTOMS TERRITORIES Pretok blaga preko meja carinsko-administrativnih območij Prejeto/Received: December 2012 Popravljeno/Revised: December 2012 Sprejeto/Accepted: Januar 2013 Marko Cedilnik Poslovni sistem Mercator, d.d., Ljubljana Univerza v Mariboru, Fakulteta za logistiko, Celje marko.cedilnik@mercator.si Abstract Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore systemic relationships within supply chains, which are created as a result of passing goods between customs territories. Specifically, this research focuses on how business entities can reduce the time consumed for the execution of mandatory customs controls at border crossings by applying the voluntary implementation of certain legally standardized institutes—in this case, the status of authorized economic operator (AEO). Design/methodology/approach - The study hypotheses were tested at two levels. The fundamental hypothesis was tested using a survey of participants' subjective perceptions. To verify the supporting hypothesis, the survey was carried out using numerical techniques (i.e., an analysis of the queuing systems). Findings - The research results show that acquisition of an AEO certificate can facilitate the acceleration of the flow of goods across customs territories. To achieve the optimum reduction of time delays caused by interruptions in the flow of goods resulting from controls conducted by authorities, it would be necessary to adapt the road infrastructure at the border crossings. Keywords: authorized economic operator (AEO), customs clearance, road transportation, flow of goods, supply chain management, meta-system Izvleček Namen. Članek je rezultat raziskovanja medsistemskih odnosov v oskrbovalnih verigah, ki nastanejo kot posledica prestopa blaga prek meja carinsko-administrativnih območij. Konkretno se raziskava nanaša na proučevanje vprašanja, ali lahko poslovni subjekti s prostovoljnim uvajanjem določenih zakonsko standardiziranih institutov, npr. statusa pooblaščenega gospodarskega subjekta (AEO), skrajšajo čas izvajanja obveznih carinskih kontrol na mejnih prehodih. Načrt, metodologija, pristop. Raziskovalne hipoteze smo preverjali na dveh ravneh. Pri preverjanju temeljne raziskovalne hipoteze smo na osnovi metode anketiranja s stališča subjektivne percepcije vseh sodelujočih deležnikov ugotavljali, ali imetništvo instituta AEO resnično vpliva na višjo hitrost procesnega pretoka blaga. Za preverjanje podporne hipoteze pa je bila opravljena raziskava na osnovi nume-rične tehnike, tj. analiza množične strežbe, pri čemer je bil predmet analize prikaz vpliva infrastrukturnega omrežja na delovanje carinskih postopkov in s tem povezanega procesa cestnega pretoka blaga. Ugotovitve. Rezultati raziskave kažejo, da pridobitev potrdila AEO pripomore k pospešitvi pretoka blaga prek meja carinsko-administrativnih območij. Za doseganje optimalnega skrajšanja zamud zaradi prekinitev blagovnega toka kot posledice kontrol, ki jih opravljajo oblastni organi, pa bi bilo treba prilagoditi cestno infrastrukturo na mejnih prehodih. Ključne besede: pooblaščeni gospodarski subjekt (AEO), carinski postopek, transport, pretok blaga, upravljanje oskrbovalnih verig, metasistem Naše gospodarstvo / Our Economy Vol. 59, No. 1-2, 2013 pp. 13-24 DOI: 10.7549/ourecon.2013.1-2.02 UDK: 658.7:336.41 JEL: F150, L980, L920 1 Introduction Increases in the volume of international trade as a result of globalization present a serious threat to the smooth flow of goods crossing state-administrative borders and, thus, indirectly affects the operation of supply chains. Congestion at border crossings represents a problem to both economic operators and customs authorities. More than 20 years ago, Stalk (1988) noted the importance of time in the context of supply systems and its impact on competitive advantage. In today's global environment, time delays present even more complex problems in terms of logistics, economy, sustainable development, and many other aspects. A recent study conducted under the auspices of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to examine the trading policy directly related the importance of time to the export and import of goods. The authors of the study (Nordas, Pinali, & Geloso Groso, 2006) revealed their findings about the growing importance of time in export and import activities in a document entitled "Logistics and Time as a Trade Barrier." They stated that delays can cause reduced volume of international trade. They also noted an increase in the amount of time-sensitive goods in the market and that modern and integrated supply chains manage these items on exact preplanned time frames (Nordas et al., 2006). In addition, the authors stated that the countries must reduce lengthy procedures for exports and imports, thereby decreasing the waiting time within the supply chain, in order to remain competitive. Therefore, exploring solutions to the time consumption problem during the crossing of customs-administration borders and the reduction of lengthy procedures associated with the crossing in the context of international supply chains would be of great value. From a logistical point of view, the flow of goods is disrupted every time the goods are stopped. Every stop results in a period of waiting. Waiting presents delays in the supply process, which affects the ability of the supply chain to be competitive. Yet modern globalized society demands that business systems continually improve their efficiency and, at the same time, unconditionally requires them to comply with all the obligations prescribed by law (and justified with the need to meet the broader needs of society). Thus, the cooperation between customs authorities and economic operators has led to the development of the concept of an authorized economic operator. The authorized economic operator represents a new concept in customs control from which both parties can benefit. It also ensures the appropriate level of security, which, in turn, does not inhibit international trade. The collaborative relationship between customs and the authorized economic operator represents a change from the traditional government-to-business (G2B) supervisory relationship to a collaboration based on trust (den Butter, Groot, & Lazrak, 2007). The requirement for obtaining the status of an authorized economic operator by the customs administration is that the economic operator must prove to customs that it can control the customs operations through its own business activities (den Butter et al. 2007) and that it is reliable in terms of its own customs operations and consequently receives certain benefits. The fundamental goal of researching the time needed for crossing customs-administrative areas is to establish whether the adjustment in the organization of economic operators (in accordance with requirements and conditions of other key participants—in our case, customs) affects the reduction of customs complexity and enhances their performance. In particular, we want to examine the benefits of the authorized economic operator in relation to the shortened time spent for crossing borders in the process of the movement of goods by road. First, we wanted to confirm the fundamental hypothesis that the authorized economic operator (AEO) status is one of the conditions for accelerating the process of the movement of goods by road and that the following equation is correct: v(E+AEO) > v(E) (1) where v is the speed of process flow of goods, E is the economic operator, and AEO is the status of the authorized economic operator. Second, we tried to confirm the supporting hypothesis that, for the optimal acceleration of the flow of goods by road in accordance with the AEO status, adjustment of the network infrastructure on the road border crossing is needed. We used the case of the Schengen border crossing at Obrežje. The remainder of this paper is structured as follows: In the following section, we review the literature, with an emphasis on customs organizations as an active factor of supply chains. We then present the research design used and findings associated with the movement of goods through the road border crossings. The final section draws conclusions from the research and presents a discussion of the results obtained in the study as well as the discovered principles. Due to the novelty of the phenomenon, we present some directions and opportunities for further research. 2 Literature Review 2.1 Customs Organizations as an Active Factor of Supply Chains Various participants are more or less actively engaged in the operation of supply chains, regardless of their objective in the collaboration. One of the participants in the international supply chains is customs, which is responsible for the control of goods entering or leaving each country. In doing so, the customs administration and other governmental authorities are trying to cope with the challenges posed by global changes in the field of supply chain functioning. Whereas safety, health, financial, and other threats require a higher level of control, the enormous amount of goods prevents the full implementation of controls at the borders (Crone, 2006). The role of customs is manifested in providing a higher level of safety in the operation of international supply chains as well as in promoting social and economic development, based on the collection of various contributions, taxes, and fees (World Customs Organization [WCO], 2007). Because of the dynamic and rapidly changing environment in which the customs authorities operate, they have to identify and understand the key international, regional, and national strategic drivers of change in order to prepare and respond to them accordingly. Gordhan (2007) stresses the following key strategic drivers that require changes in the operation of both sides—namely, the customs authorities and the economic operators: - Growing scope of international trade: In practice, this represents a greater number of transactions and consequently increased workload for customs, usually with the same or even reduced resources. On the other hand, this significantly impacts the economic operators in terms of waiting times and prolonged processing, which can lead to congestion and delays in the shipment of goods. - The liberalization of trade: Measures to facilitate and promote trade are being implemented, such as the reduction in the scope of border control. However, at the same time, these measures inadvertently create opportunities for illegal trade, which is in conflict with the interests of both customs and the economy. - Changed traditional trade patterns and an increase in the number of participants—namely, the increased rate of the representation of developing countries in international trade and a significant change in the structure of trade. - New models of supply chains: New innovative methods focus on the processes of the movement of goods. The role of customs is to handle shipments efficiently and accurately and, at the same time, as quickly as possible because any delays in movement result in increased costs and undermine the competitiveness of the participants. - The emergence of international criminal groups: The consequences of the criminal activities of a transnational nature and their damage are serious and long term for both the state apparatus and the economy. - Concern for the public health and environment: Regulations on these sensitive areas strongly affect the functioning of customs services as they have (or at least should have) an overview of the international transport of dangerous and harmful substances. Based on the described drivers, we can assert that the role of the customs service has changed over time, shifting from the original role of the collection of duties into the operator of various systems at national borders. However, the basic function remains the same: controlling the movement of goods and accompanying documents across borders. With this, customs protect legitimate trade and society against the illegal importation of prohibited goods that could pose risks to people's lives and health. Experts have increasingly understood that customs have an important impact on the economy, as they promote or impede international trade. The borders of the European Union (and of the world) all deal with the passage of large volumes of diverse goods, where each additional inspection due to customs or security procedures results in time delays and significantly impacts the speed of movement of goods and, consequently, their quality and price. Each time delay is also an additional burden in terms of logistics, infrastructure, personnel, finances, and other resources. The speed of the movement of goods is predominantly determined by the most time-consuming part of the process. This part of the process inhibits rapid performance by all other participants and thus presents a bottleneck at the border crossing point (Nordas et al., 2006). For example, in the border crossing system depicted in Figure 1, the capacity of customs procedures enables the inspection of 200 heavy goods vehicles in one hour, whereas other processes within the border system operate at much higher capacities. As a result, the customs activities impede the course of other processes. The line of vehicles at the border crossing moves at the pace of the slowest participant—in this case, customs. Waters (2009) says that certain activities, such as removing the obstacles (unnecessary documentation, fees and taxes) at border crossing activities for ongoing improvements in the communication network and logistics infrastructure and activities of specialized support for routine tasks (freight forwarders and shipping agents), can greatly contribute to making the management of customs procedures more transparent. In order to improve the process of the movement of goods and increase fluidity of the customs system, the key objective of the customs organizations is to maintain effective control without inhibiting legitimate trade. Customs administrations can achieve this control in terms of their cooperation with economic institutions in the form of partnerships, where the interests of both sides are represented to the greatest extent possible (Mikuriya, 2007). Thus, we can identify related structures of the two systems with certain common and individual interests: the economic operator and customs. As previously mentioned, the collaboration between the participants and an effective management of the meta-system will significantly impact the improvement of overall international business activities. Approaches based on the principles of cooperation and voluntary compliance with requirements, which also bring benefits, are more likely to support the improvement of the movement of goods and an increase in fluidity of the customs system than approaches that depend on enforced compliance and interfere with the work processes (Widdowson & Holloway, 2009). Figure 1 : Bottleneck at the border crossing point. Adapted from Supply Chain Management: An Introduction to Logistics, 2nd ed. (p. 120) by D. Waters, 2009, New York, Palgrave Macmillan. 2.2 Studies Related to AEO The status of an authorized economic operator (AEO) provides a good example of establishing trust and control in a collaborative G2B relationship with the intention of minimizing operating costs and the costs linked with bureaucratic procedures. The AEO concept is based on information support, such as various tracking systems, exchanges of information, and surveillance cameras. The European Union determines this approach as the management and accounting system, which covers the financial aspects, flow management, information and communication systems, and legal control in the performance of transactions to ensure that the supply system can manage the risks (Pilotno poročilo o pooblaščenih gospodarskih subjektih, 2006). The idea of this concept is reflected in the possibility of establishing a partnership between customs administrations and business organizations to maintain a high level of security in international trade (den Butter et al., 2007). The AEO represents a new concept of customs control-based benefits for both parties, which is attributed to the implementation of the "win-win" philosophy. Here, we refer to collaborative and trusted cooperation, where each party is involved in the winning outcome or benefits resulting from the collaboration. An authorized economic operator can be defined as an economic operator which is reliable within the European Union in terms of its own customs operations and can therefore receive certain benefits in the European Union (European Commission Directorate-general Taxation and Customs Union, 2007). Based on this cooperation, the benefits of the economic operator are primarily indicated in the implementation of fewer physical checks of consignments and faster dealings with customs procedures. On the other hand, customs administrations' simplified procedures result in certain benefits hat lower the level of administrative obstacles. Customs organizations thus benefit from more precise identification and evaluation of threats present in the everyday movement of goods across the customs borders. Those economic operators who meet the criteria and conditions of the AEO status create certain benefits in the area of customs controls and simplification in accordance with customs regulations (Jere & Podbregar, 2009). AEO status can, based on its application, be granted by a member state of the European Union to any economic operator involved in any way in the international movement of goods and that meets the "common criteria for control systems, financial solvency and compliance with the provisions" (Regulation (EC) No 648/2005). Legal aspects of the certification, including the explanation of benefits, are systematically presented in the article "The Authorised Economic Operator in the European Union," in which special attention is given to the definition of the practical effects in the implementation of customs procedures (Wolffgang & Natzel, 2011). The introduction of the report of the National Board of Trade of Sweden states that the procedures for obtaining the certificate are transparent and allow all companies to gain advantages in terms of reducing the scope of controls (Kommerskollegium National Board of Trade, 2010). They even wrote that the system of authorized import companies enables the operation of supply chains without the need to stop. In light of trade promotion, it is important that the processes not be burdened by complicated customs procedures or non-transparent rules and procedures (Kommerskollegium National Board of Trade, 2010). The customs authorities can, following an application by an economic operator and in accordance with Article 14 of the Regulation (EC) 1875/2006, issue the following authorized economic operators' certificates: (a) AEO certificate AEOC: Customs simplifications in terms of economic operators requesting benefits from simplifications provided for under the customs rules; (b) AEO certificate AEOS: Security and safety with respect to economic operators requesting benefits from the facilitation of customs controls relating to security and safety when the goods enter or leave the customs territory of the community; (c) AEO certificate AEOF: Customs simplifications/ security and safety with respect to economic operators requesting benefits from the simplifications described in point (a) and the facilitations described in point (b). Considering the fact that the mentioned types of certificates are different, the benefits of the individual partners are not uniformly defined for each type of AEO certificate (Gellert, 2011). The objective of the supply chain is to discover the most effective and competitive manner of delivery of the right product at the right place and agreed-upon time (Kavcic & Bratina, 2008); thus, the receipt of AEO status is, for the company, one of the ways of introducing improvements in the movement of goods. The benefits provided to economic operators after obtaining AEO status influence the acceleration and simplification of the movement of goods and the related procedures, thereby enabling the reduction of the complexity of processes in the supply chain. Consequently, it is also possible to minimize physical stops due to administrative requirements, which—according to the results of certain studies (Hausman et al., 2005; Subramanian et al., 2005; Bolhofer, 2008)—largely impact the success of logistics processes. G2B interactions and AEO status definitely help in promoting international trade and maintaining security in the movement of goods and ultimately contribute to higher gross domestic product. The status of AEO is therefore directed to establishing a trusted partnership, in which the economic operators prove to be capable of managing their own customs control procedures. The AEO status is relatively new and was approved in the European Union as recently as 2008. However, from the perspective of the rapid expansion and intensification of international trade as well as the development of new technologies, products, and services as a result of globalization, it is no longer a new phenomenon. Despite this, there are no specific studies or literature dealing directly with the time-related impacts of the obtained AEO certificate on the flow of goods. As noted, the majority of studies that deal with the concept of AEO are limited to indicating the legal basis for obtaining a certificate and to stating the benefits for the economic operator after receiving the certificate. In addition, all sources almost invariably indicate that the AEO certificate enables the provision of a greater level of security in the operation of supply chains. 3 Research Design Testing of the study hypotheses was carried out on two levels. To check the fundamental hypothesis, we used a survey method that examines the subjective perceptions of all participants to determine whether the AEO status really speeds up the process of the movement of goods. To verify this approach, the exploration was carried out using numerical techniques, where the subject of the analysis illustrated the impact of the network infrastructure of customs procedures and related processes for the movement of goods by road. Different techniques and methods were used to test the study hypotheses. One of them is the triangulation method, which provides complex insights into the problem studied by combining different sources of data, theories, methods, techniques, and disciplines (Jick, 1979). As the empirical part of the study was carried out on two different levels, we used the multi-method researching principle to confirm the fundamental and supporting study hypothesis. This principle is particularly suitable for exploring more complex and interdisciplinary problems (Collier & Elman, 2008; Tos & Hafner-Fink, 1998), which we have seen in the course of the present study. 3.1 Survey We used questionnaires to elicit respondents' subjective assessments of whether the AEO status actually speeds up the movement of goods by road, as claimed by most studies conducted thus far (den Butter, Liu, & Tan, 2012; Wolffgang & Natzel, 2011). As the AEO status facilitates the performance of activities for both the economic operator and the customs authorities, the survey was conducted among representatives of both types of entity. The invitation to participate in an online survey was sent to all the customs office representatives in the Republic of Slovenia (a total of 10 offices) and to the General Customs Directorate of the Republic of Slovenia. The invitation for the online survey was also sent to all Slovenian economic operators who are holders of the AEO certificate. As the purpose of the study was to find the actual realization of all benefits related to the ownership of the AEO status, AEOC and AEOS certificate holders were not considered in the target population; only holders of AEOF certificates were. As the invitation for the online survey was sent at the end of November 2011, we considered only those operators in the entire population of the AEOF certificate holders that had acquired the status by 22 November 2011. The website of the European Commission states that 36 AEOF certificates had been issued by 22 November 2012 in the Slovenian territory. Thus, we considered 36 AEOF certified economic operators and all 11 customs offices. The online survey received 20 responses from economic operators, representing a 56% response rate, and 10 from customs offices, constituting a response rate of 91%. As the entire population of both economic operators and customs offices includes only a small number of respondents, sampling was not performed in the present study. In this way, we preserved the features of the entire population and ensured the validity of the given analysis (Zamani-Gal-lagher, 2011). The survey was conducted using the Survey Monkey web application. The two survey questionnaires (one to economic operators holding the AEOF certificate and one to the representatives of the customs offices) comprised a self-completing survey with closed-ended questions. The two questionnaires have the same structure, which is based on providing the 10 benefits of the AEO status as identified by the European Commission (European Commission Directorate-general Taxation and Customs Union, 2007). Both questionnaires contained 27 identical questions and 2 unique questions. The two survey questionnaires were composed so that the analysis enables the verification of the actual realization of the individual benefit supposedly guaranteed by the AEO status. Although the results obtained in the study are subjective, their power is evident in the numerical evaluation of an individual subjective perspective. The respondents had to evaluate their own agreement with an individual statement. For this purpose, a 5-point Likert scale was used. According to de Velis, Neuman, and Shnell, a Likert scale is most commonly used for measuring factors such as opinions, beliefs, and behaviors (as cited in Bizjak, 2008, p. 54). Its specific feature is, according to Supek, that it directly addresses the respondents, who must answer all the statements (as cited in Bizjak, 2008, p. 54). A quantitative survey method was used to verify the fundamental hypothesis, while for the interpretation of the results and findings of the study, causal and descriptive methods were primarily used. 3.2 Analysis of the Queuing Systems The numerical technique (i.e., the analysis of the queuing systems) was used to verify the supporting study hypothesis. Such techniques are most commonly used in the design and analysis of various communication and information networks and in the analysis of the broad field of logistics and other queuing problems. The main purpose behind the analysis of queuing systems is the collection of data, the mutual comparison of different systems, and the design of completely new systems (Hudoklin-Božič, 1999). In the selected case of the Schengen border crossing Bregana (Croatia)-Obrežje (Slovenia), specifically at the point of entry into the territory of the European Union, we analyzed the utilization of the border-crossing system based on the changes in the points where queues occur. One-week measurements of flow times in the freight transportation by road were made at the Schengen border crossing Obrežje from 29 June 2009 to 7 July 2009 (Ministrstvo za infrastrukturo in prostor Republike Slovenije, 2010). We focused primarily on the impact of changes in the infrastructure network in relation to the pacing of procedures for crossing the border. The potential time savings in relation to the performance of these procedures result in a better utilization of the entire system—a finding made possible because we deal with the sequential dependence between successive procedures in the context of border crossings. Statistical methods, multivariate analyses, mathematical methods, and methods for the graphical display of data were used in the analysis of the border system utilization. 4 Findings 4.1 Survey Research Findings Average evaluations of the answers from all the respondents are listed in two tables. Table 1 deals with the answers given by the economic operators, and Table 2 refers to the answers given by the customs office representatives. Table 1: Economic Operators' Evaluations of Listed AEO Benefits (average) AEO Benefits Score (1-5)a 1. Fewer physical and document-based controls 4.00 2. Priority treatment of consignments if selected for control 4.10 3. Choice of the place of controls 4.36 4. Easier admittance to customs simplifications 4.25 5. Reduced data set for entry and exit summary declarations 3.25 6. Prior notification 3.33 7. Indirect benefits 3.22 8. Improved relations with customs 4.11 9. Recognized as a secure and safe business partner 3.69 10. Improved relations and acknowledgement by other government authorities 3.50 ■ 1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree Table 2: Customs Office Representatives' Evaluations of Listed AEO Benefits (average) AEO Benefits Score (1-5)a 1. Fewer physical and document-based controls 4.38 2. Priority treatment of consignments if selected for control 2.75 3. Choice of the place of controls 3.89 4. Easier admittance to customs simplifications 4.67 5. Reduced data set for entry and exit summary declarations 3.25 6. Prior notification 3.50 7. Indirect benefits 3.50 8. Improved relations with customs 4.38 9. Recognized as a secure and safe business partner 4.00 10. Improved relations and acknowledgement by other government authorities 4.00 ■ 1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree The tables indicate that both participants perceive easier admittance to customs simplifications to be the greatest benefit as 70% of economic operators believe that easier access and simplifications in customs significantly (score 4.25) speed up the process of movement of goods by road, while 30% of customs authorities think that this benefit has an even more significant impact (score 4.67). The tables also demonstrate that both participants perceive the lowest benefit from reduced data set for entry and exit summary declarations as both the economic operators and the customs authorities rated this benefit as having a medium (score 3.25) impact on speeding up the movement of goods by road. At this point we should stress that medium impact on the speeding up the movement of goods by road is still a positive situation, especially compared with a low or no rate of speeding up. Thus, the analysis confirms the fundamental hypothesis of the study. We did not find any explicitly negative responses from the participants in the present study. We also noted that all of the 10 studied benefits of the AEO status have a medium to significant impact on speeding up the process of the movement of goods by road. Despite the fact that some of the questions are not equally represented in the context of individual benefits, the result of the study remains the same. This can be substantiated by an additional question, in which the population of economic operators (average score 3.22) as well as the population of customs authorities (average score 3.20) believe that having the AEO certificate has a higher-than-medium impact on speeding up the movement of goods by road. This finding further confirms the fundamental study hypothesis as the responses of all participants in the customs system confirm that the AEO status speeds up the movement of goods by road. 4.2 Analysis of the Queuing Systems Findings The measurements at the Schengen border crossing Obrežje registered 4462 heavy goods vehicles (HGVs) entering the territory of the European Union. In addition to the basic characteristics of transportation and the frequency of crossing the border, the recorded data obtained for all 4462 HGVs also included measurements of flow times related to performing various administrative and other activities. Border crossing by HGVs from Croatia to Slovenia includes freight forwarding, veterinary and phytosanitary inspection, customs, and police on both Figure 2: Number of HGVs crossing the Schengen border crossing Obrežje. 1000 - 900 - 800 - - - 700 - - - - - w 3.0.CO;2-1 11. Gordhan, P. (2007). Customs in the 21st century. World Customs Journal, 1(1), 49-55. 12. Hausman, W. H., Hau, L. L., & Subramanian, U. (2005). Global logistics indicators, supply chain metrics, and bilateral trade patterns (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3773). doi:10.1596/1813-9450-3773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3773 13. Heylighen, F., & Joslyn, C. (2001). Cybernetics and second-order cybernetics. In R. A. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Physical Science & Technology (3rd ed.) (pp. 155-169). New York: Academic Press. 14. Hudoklin-Božič, A. (1999). Stohastični procesi. Kranj: Moderna organizacija. 15. Jere, M., & Podbregar, I. (2009). Status pooblaščenega gospodarskega subjekta in varnost podjetja. In T. Pavšič Mrevlje (Ed.), Varstvoslovje med teorijo in prakso: zbornik prispevkov / 10. Slovenski dnevi varstvoslovja, Ljubljana, 4.-5. Retrieved from http://www.fvv.uni-mb.si/dv2009/ zbornik/clanki/Jere.pdf 16. Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in Action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602-611. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2392366 17. Kommerskollegium National Board of Trade. (2010, September). Mutual recognition of AEO programmes: Supply chain security and trade facilitation—progress report fall 2010. Retrieved from http://www.kommers.se/ upload/Analysarkiv/In%20English/Trade%20facilitati-on/Report%20Supply%20chain%20security%20and%20 trade%20facilitation%20-%20progress%20report%20 2010.pdf 18. Mikuriya, K. (2007). Supply chain security: The customs community response. World Customs Journal, 1(2), 51-61. 19. Ministrstvo za infrastrukturo in prostor Republike Slovenije. (2010). Pilotni projekt merjenja pretočnih časov tovornega prometa na mejnem prehodu Obrežje. Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za infrastrukturo in prostor Republike Slovenije. 20. Nordas, H. K., Pinali, E., & Geloso Grosso, M. (2006). Logistics and time as a trade barrier (OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 35). doi:10.1787/664220308873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/664220308873 21. Pilotno poročilo o pooblaščenih gospodarskih subjektih. (2006). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_ customs/resources/documents/customs/policy_issues/ customs_security/AEO_pilot_report_sl.pdf 22. Regulation (EC) No 648/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 April 2005. 23. Rushton, A., Croucher, P., & Baker, P. (2010). The handbook of logistics & distribution management (4th ed.). London: Kogan Page. 24. Stalk, G. (1988). Time—The next source of competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 66(Jul-Aug), 41-51. 25. Subramanian, U., Anderson, W. P., & Lee, K. (2005). Measuring the impact of the investment climate on total factor productivity: The cases of China and Brazil. (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3792). doi:10.1596/1813-9450-3792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3792 26. Toš, N., & Hafner-Fink, M. (1998). Metode družboslovnega raziskovanja. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede. 27. Waters, D. (2009). Supply chain management: An introduction to logistics (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 28. Widdowson, D., & Holloway, S. (2009). Maritime transport security regulation: policies, probabilities and practicalities. World Customs Journal, 3(2), 17-43. 29. Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Paris: Hermann. 30. Wolfgang, H. M., & Natzel, J. M. (2011). The authorized economic operator in the European Union. Customs Scientific Journal, Pilot edition(1), 23-39. 31. World Customs Organization. (2007, January 12). WCO SAFE framework of standards. Retrieved from http:// www.wcoomd.org/files/1%20Public%20files/PDFan-dDocuments/SAFE%20Framework_EN_2007_for_ publication.pdf 32. Zamani-Gallagher, E. M. (2011, November 3). Evaluating with small sample sizes. Retrieved from http://evalu-ate. net/downloads/resources/ZAMANI-GALLAHER_ challenge_handout.pdf Marko Cedilnik has been executive director of logistics in Mercator d. d., one of the biggest Slovenian companies, since 1989. He has 20 years of professional experience in logistics and supply chain management and has deep theoretical and practical knowledge in the fields of business process re-engineering and change management. He holds a master's degree in logistics engineering and a bachelor's degree in law. Since 2006, he has been a lecturer at the Faculty of Logistics at the University of Maribor, where he is responsible for the courses Logistics Documentation and Commercial and Warehousing Operations. He has published several articles in the area of logistics and is the co-author of a manual for effective logistics. Marko Cedilnik je izvršni direktor logistike v Mercatorju, d. d., enem največjih slovenskih podjetij, v katerem je zaposlen že od leta 1989. Ima 20 let strokovnih izkušenj s področja upravljanja logistike in oskrbovalnih verig ter poglobljeno teoretično in praktično znanje s področja prenove poslovnih procesov in upravljanja sprememb. Po izobrazbi je magister inženir logistike in univerzitetni diplomirani pravnik. Od leta 2006 je habilitiran za predavatelja na Fakulteti za logistiko Univerze v Mariboru, kjer je nosilec predmetov Logistična dokumentacija ter Trgovinsko in skladiščno poslovanje. Je avtor več strokovnih in znanstvenih člankov s področja logistike in soavtor Priročnika za učinkovito logistiko. IZVIRNI ZNANSTVENI ČLANEK - ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER PROTIPRAVNA PREMOŽENJSKA KORIST PRI STORITVI GOSPODARSKIH KAZNIVIH DEJANJ Proceeds of Criminal Offense according to Article 240 of the Criminal Code Prejeto/Received: December 2012 Sprejeto/Accepted: Januar 2013 Dušan Jovanovič Univerza v Mariboru, Ekonomsko-poslovna fakulteta dusan.jovanovic@uni-mb.si Miha Bratina študent LL.M. na School of Tax and Business law, Westfälische Wilhems-Universität Münster in doktorski študent na Pravni fakulteti Univerze v Ljubljani miha.bratina@yahoo.com Izvleček Avtorja v prispevku analizirata elemente kaznivega dejanja v gospodarstvu iz 240. člena Kazenskega zakonika (KZ-1), predvsem s korporacijskega vidika. Pri tem se tematika nanaša na (ne)pridobitev premoženjske koristi kot temeljne predpostavke pri storitvi gospodarskih kaznivih dejanj. Hkrati so v prispevku navedena in utemeljena izpostavljena pravna vprašanja z obsežno sodno prakso tujih sodišč. Predstavljeni so tudi nekateri primeri legalnega ravnanja znotraj korporacijskega prava, kjer so se v zadnjem času pojavile tendence za storitev kaznivih dejanj pri članih organov vodenja in nadzora v gospodarskih družbah. Ključne besede: gospodarska družba, premoženjska korist, kaznivo dejanje, koncern, združevanje finančnih sredstev Abstract In the article, the authors analyze the elements of a criminal offense according to Article 240 of the Criminal Code (KZ-1) from the corporate point of view. They focus on the proceeds of the criminal offense according to the aforementioned article, which are its core element. The article also states and substantiates the exposed legal questions connected to the extensive case law of foreign courts. Some practical examples are provided of legal proceedings within corporate law, where lately some tendencies for supervisory and management board members to commit criminal offenses have appeared. Keywords: Company, cash pooling, proceeds of offenses, criminal offense, concern of companies, concentration of financial resources 1 Uvod V zadnjem času se v Republiki Sloveniji spričo slabših globalnih in lokalnih gospodarskih razmer pospešeno iščejo dežurni krivci za nastale razmere v državi in v gospodarskih družbah. Pri tem je veliko truda vloženega predvsem v kazenske pregone članov organov vodenja in nadzora v gospodarskih družbah, nekoliko manj pa v civilne odškodninske zahtevke. Osnovno dejanje, ki se preganja po uradni dolžnosti, temelji na 240. členu Kazenskega zakonika (Kazenski zakonik, 2012). Zloraba položaja ali zaupanja pri gospodarski dejavnosti (1) Kdor pri opravljanju gospodarske dejavnosti, zato da bi sebi ali komu drugemu pridobil protipravno premoženjsko korist ali povzročil premoženjsko škodo, zlorabi svoj položaj ali dano zaupanje, prekorači pravice ali opusti dolžnosti, Naše gospodarstvo / Our Economy Vol. 59, No. 1-2, 2013 pp. 25-34 DOI: 10.7549/ourecon.2013.1-2.03 UDK: 347.7:343 JEL: K 14, K 22 ki jih ima na podlagi zakona, drugega predpisa, akta pravne osebe ali pravnega posla glede razpolaganja s tujim premoženjem ali koristmi, njihovega upravljanja ali zastopanja, se kaznuje z zaporom do petih let. (2) Če je bila z dejanjem iz prejšnjega odstavka pridobljena velika premoženjska korist ali povzročena velika premoženjska škoda in je storilec hotel sebi ali komu drugemu pridobiti tako premoženjsko korist ali drugemu povzročiti tako premoženjsko škodo, se kaznuje z zaporom od enega do osmih let. (3) Če je bilo dejanje iz prvega odstavka tega člena storjeno zato, da storilec sebi ali komu drugemu pridobi nepremo-ženjsko korist, se storilec kaznuje z zaporom do dveh let. Navedeno kaznivo dejanje temelji na premoženjski koristi oz. premoženjski škodi, ki naj bi bila storjena pri opravljanju gospodarske dejavnosti, namenjena pa je lahko samemu storilcu kaznivega dejanja ali komu tretjemu. V nadaljevanju se bomo zato podrobneje ukvarjali s protipravno premoženjsko koristjo. Prispevek temelji deloma na določbah Kazenskega zakonika. Dodatno je za odgovore na vprašanja (ne) obstoja premoženjske koristi pri fizični osebi ali gospodarski družbi treba razumeti predvsem osnovne postulate korporacijskega prava. Zaradi slednjega je treba upoštevati določbe ZGD-1 (Zakon o gospodarskih družbah, 2009), ki je matični zakon in ureja gospodarske družbe. Z uporabo vsega navedenega je nato treba odgovoriti na vprašanje, kaj premoženjska korist v smislu protipravno pridobljene premoženjske koristi sploh je, kaj so njene predpostavke in ali so izpolnjene v konkretnem primeru. Decidirano pa je torej treba jasno ločiti civilno-pravno odškodninsko odgovornost članov organov vodenja in nadzora ter posledično povzročitev škode in nastalo škodo od kazensko-pravno protipravne premoženjske koristi v povezavi s storitvijo kaznivega dejanja. Zato so v drugem delu prispevka opredeljeni nekateri tipični korporacijsko-pravni (civilni) posli, katerih kršitev ali morebitni obstoj elementa protipravnosti še ne pomeni nujno (avtomatsko) obstoja elementov kaznivega dejanja ter protipravne premoženjske koristi. Zaradi narave protipravne premoženjske koristi, ki kot takšna predstavlja splošno znan pravni institut, je pri interpretaciji treba upoštevati tudi tujo pravno teorijo, zaradi sorodnosti predvsem nemško. Prav tako pa je treba pogled usmeriti tako v domačo kot tujo sodno prakso. 2 Splošno o protipravno pridobljeni premoženjski koristi Kot protipravno pridobljeno premoženjsko korist je treba obravnavati vsako povečanje premoženja storilca, ki ima svoj vzrok v storitvi kaznivega dejanja (Bele, 2001). Pri tem je treba ločevati situacijo, ko se premoženjska korist pridobi s kaznivim dejanjem, kdaj se pridobi zaradi kaznivega dejanja in v kakšni obliki se pridobi. S kaznivim dejanjem je pridobljena takrat, ko storilec z izvršitvijo kaznivega dejanja sebi ali komu drugemu neposredno omogoči razpolaganje s premoženjsko koristjo (Bele, 2001). Kot pridobitev premoženjske koristi zaradi kaznivega dejanja se po eni strani kaže posredno razpolaganje s koristjo, ki jo je omogočila storitev kaznivega dejanja, poleg tega pa vse prejete nagrade za storjeno kaznivo dejanje. Kazenski zakonik se omejuje na premoženjsko korist, ki je bila pridobljena s storjenim kaznivim dejanjem ali zaradi že storjenega kaznivega dejanja. Za premoženjsko korist se šteje čisti presežek premoženja, pridobljen s kaznivim dejanjem ali zaradi njega ter izhaja iz kriminalne dejavnosti in je s kaznivim dejanjem v vzročni zvezi (Bavcon in Šelih, 2003). Kot premoženjska korist se praviloma upošteva tisto premoženje, s katerim storilec lahko razpolaga ob dokončanju kaznivega dejanja (Bele, 2001). Po drugi strani pa tudi poznejša izguba protipravno pridobljenega premoženja ne more vplivati na to, da se storilcu ne bi vzela premoženjska korist v vrednosti ob storitvi kaznivega dejanja (Bele, 2001). Toda logični pogoj za slednje je, da je premoženjska korist na strani storilca kaznivega dejanja dejansko obstajala, kar pomeni, da je obstajal čisti presežek premoženja, pridobljen s kaznivim dejanjem ali zaradi njega, s katerim je storilec lahko razpolagal ob dokončanju kaznivega dejanja. Iz navedenega in s pomočjo nemške teorije in sodne prakse lahko izluščimo nekatere predpostavke, ki morajo biti podane, da lahko govorimo o obstoju protipravno pridobljene premoženjske koristi. Bistveni predpostavki sta tako: (dejanski) čisti presežek premoženja, ki se kaže v neposredni koristi,1 ki je v vzročni zvezi s kaznivim dejanjem, ter možnost (posrednega) razpolaganja s tem premoženjem ob storitvi kaznivega dejanja. Oboje izhaja tudi iz številnih sodb nemškega vrhovnega sodišča, ki zadnje poimenuje kot »faktische Verfügungsgewalt«.2 Enakega stališča je ob navedeni slovenski teoriji tudi nemška (Bittmann, 2004; Nestler, 2010). Tako npr. izhaja iz sodbe Vrhovnega sodišča Zvezne republike Nemčije z dne 12. 8. 2003, opr. št. 1 StR 127/03, kjer izrecno poudari, da mora iti za neposredno korist. Glej sodbo Vrhovnega sodišča Zvezne republike Nemčije z dne 22. 7. 2010, opr. št. 3 StR 147/10, kjer sodišče pravi: »'Erlangt' im Sinne der § 73 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 73a Satz 1 StGB ist ein Vermögensvorteil nur dann, wenn der Tatbeteiligte die faktische Verfügungsgewalt über den Gegenstand erworben hat (vgl. BGH NStZ 2003, 198 f.). Mit der pauschalen Angabe, aus den Betäubungsmittelgeschäften sei ein Umsatz von mindestens 135.000 € erzielt worden, wird dieser Umstand nicht belegt.« Z drugimi besedami to pomeni, da golo dejstvo, da je iz kaznivega dejanja nastal neki presežek, ne zadostuje za kvalifikacijo protipravno pridobljene premoženjske koristi, temveč mora nad takšno koristjo obstajati dejanska razpolagalna oblast.). Zanimiva je tudi odločitev Ustavnega sodišča Zvezne republike Nemčije z dne 9. 6. 2006, opr. št. 50/06, ki pri opredelitvi protipravno pridobljene premoženjske koristi s strani direktorja družbe, njenega pooblaščenca ali drugega organa sodišče izrecno ločuje premoženje družbe od premoženja omenjenih oseb in jasno določi, da morajo biti kumulativno izpolnjene vse predpostavke, in sicer čisti presežek premoženja, dejanska razpolagalna oblast in tudi dejanska korist za konkretno osebo. 3.1 Nekateri inkriminirani primeri iz korporacijske prakse Cash pooling kot predmet kaznivega dejanja?! T. i. »cash pooling« ali združevanje finančnih sredstev (effective pooling) pomeni avtomatizirane prenose denarnih sredstev s sodelujočih transakcijskih računov skupine podjetij na izbrani, glavni račun matičnega podjetja. Sredstva na vseh računih, razen glavnega računa, se ob koncu dne prenesejo v celoti oz. nad določenim limitom na glavni račun. Po drugi strani pa se lahko s sredstev na glavnem računu pokrivajo morebitni primanjklja- Druge sodbe, v katerih sodišče zavzema podobno stališče, so npr.: sodba Vrhovnega sodišča Zvezne republike Nemčije z dne 28. 10. 2010 , opr. št. 4 StR 215/10; sklep Vrhovnega sodišča Zvezne republike Nemčije z dne 10. 1. 2008, opr. št. 5 StR 365/07; sklep Vrhovnega sodišča Zvezne republike Nemčije z dne 27. 5. 2008, opr. št. 3 StR 50/08 (v tej odločitvi sodišče npr. izrecno razsodi: »Damit bleibt offen, in welcher Höhe der Angeklagte neben den Mittätern Verkaufserlöse tatsächlich 'erlangt' hat im Sinne des §§ 73 Abs. 1 S. 1, 73a S. 1 StGB. 'Erlangt' ist ein Vermögensvorteil nur dann, wenn der Tatbeteiligte die faktische Verfügungsgewalt über den Gegenstand erworben hat (vgl. BGH NStZ 2003, 198 f.)«), od koder izhaja prav ločevanje sodišča med samim izkupičkom določenih poslov oz. dejanj in dejanskim dobičkom oz. presežkom premoženja, ki ga je iz tega imela fizična oseba; BGH, sklep z dne 8. 12. 2010 - 2 StR 372/10; izredno pomembna odločitev v konkretnem primeru pa je tudi odločitev Ustavnega sodišča Zvezne republike Nemčije z dne 3. 5. 2005, opr. št. 2 BvR 1378/04, kjer je med drugim sodišče odločilo naslednje: »b) Das Amtsgericht übergeht die Frage einer Trennung der Vermögenssphären der Beschwerdeführerin und der von ihr vertretenen und durch die vermeintliche Tat begünstigten GmbH, die für die korrekte Zuordnung des erlangten Etwas und damit für die Anwendung des § 73 Abs. 3 StGB von herausragender Bedeutung ist. Auch das Landgericht wird diesem zentralen Gesichtspunkt mit seinen oberflächlich bleibenden Wendungen nicht gerecht. Es stellt maßgeblich auf die Stellung der Beschwerdeführerin als Gesellschafterin ab. Aber weder dieser Umstand noch die faktische Zugriffsmöglichkeit auf das Vermögen der Gesellschaft erlauben ohne weiteres eine Zuordnung der an die GmbH gezahlten Geldbeträge zum Vermögen der Beschwerdeführerin. Das Landgericht teilt nur mit, es bestehe der Verdacht, "dass der Geldvorteil an die Beschuldigte als wirtschaftliche Mitinhaberin weitergegeben worden ist, so dass diese im Ergebnis die Begünstigte war". Das ist für einen Zugriff auf das Vermögen der Beschwerdeführerin, nicht der Gesellschaft, unzureichend, denn es bleibt offen, was für eine "Weitergabe" des "Geldvorteils" an die Beschwerdeführerin sprechen könnte und wie sie durchgeführt worden sein könnte. Das ist gerade für den Vorteil von Belang, den die GmbH durch die vermeintlich betrügerisch erwirkte Abweisung einer Klage erlangt haben könnte. Hier kann noch weniger als bei einer Zahlung an die Gesellschaft mit pauschalen Wendungen begründet werden, dass die Vermögensmehrung der Gesellschaft zugleich eine Vermögensmehrung der Gesellschafter bedeutet. Das Landgericht hätte eingehend darlegen müssen, weshalb es von dem nahe liegenden Verweis auf eine Sicherungsmaßnahme, die gegen das Vermögen der Gesellschaft zu richten wäre, abgesehen hat.« Prav iz te odločitve izhaja izrecno ločevanje med premoženjem družbe in družbenikov, pri čemer sodišče zavrne možnost posega v premoženje fizične osebe, družbenika zgolj zaradi tega, ker je družbenik/ca družbe, ki naj bi takšno korist pridobila. Pri tem je pa treba poudariti, da to velja še toliko bolj, če koristi ni bilo niti na ravni družbe, kar je primer prav v zadevi IV Kpr 59294/2010, na kateri temelji predmetno mnenje. ji na računih udeležencev. Obresti so obračunane glede na stanje na glavnem računu. Običajno združevanje denarnih sredstev poteka v evrih, možne pa so tudi druge valute. Cash pooling se najpogosteje opravi na način, da se izvede t. i. »up-stream-loan« (up-stream posojilo oz. posojilo navzgor). S pojmom upstream posojil razumemo posojila družb hčera (torej odvisnih družb) družbam materam (torej obvladujočim družbam) oz. posojila družbenikov njihovim družbenikom. Ker je naša korporacijska zakonodaja v bistvenem vsebinskem delu enaka kot nemška, je treba zaradi bogatejše sodne prakse v Zvezni republiki Nemčiji za pravilno razlago nekaterih določb in pravnih institutov, ki so pri nas še relativno nerazviti, poseči po tuji, predvsem nemški sodni praksi in teoriji, ki jo navajamo v nadaljevanju. V Zvezni republiki Nemčiji so takšna posojila med drugim urejena z Zakonom o družbah z omejeno odgovornostjo (GmbHG) (Gesetz betreffend die Gesellschaften mit beschränkter Haftung, 2010), natančneje v 30. členu GmbHG, ki na začetku v 1. odstavku določa, da se premoženje družbe, ki je potrebno za ohranitev njenega osnovnega kapitala, ne sme izplačevati družbenikom.3 V nemški ureditvi je bila sprva v veljavi t. i. bilančna presoja.4 Po tej presoji se dopustnost izplačila likvidnostnih sredstev družbe v breme osnovnega kapitala te družbe presoja predvsem po tem, ali je obstajala s tem v zvezi tudi izplačilu/posojilu enakovredna odmena (npr. terjatev za vračilo posojila zoper posojilojemalca) (Schmidt, 2002). Če je tako, gre le za zamenjavo na strani aktive, ki pa ne pomeni kršitve določb, ki urejajo ohranjanje osnovnega kapitala. Če je odmena ogrožena, torej ne izpolnjuje več pogoja enakovrednosti izplačilu/posojilu, gre za kršitev, če gre ta primanjkljaj v breme premoženja, ki je potrebno za ohranjanje osnovnega kapitala (Pentz, 2005). V tem okviru je ključnega pomena »nepričakovana« sodba Zveznega sodišča Zvezne republike Nemčije5 (t. i. »novembrska sodba«), ki »negativno« zaznamuje staro ureditev glede dajanja up-stream posojil,6 saj pravi, da so posojila družbenikom, ki ne izhajajo iz rezerv ali dobička, temveč iz vezanega kapitala d. o. o., prepovedana tudi takrat, ko za izplačilo obstaja odmena oz. terjatev zoper družbenika kot posojilojemalca, tudi če je ta popolnoma enakovredna. Vendar dejstvo, da sodišče to posebej omenja v sodbi, pomeni tudi, da to iz samega zakona ne izhaja (sploh ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je pred to sodbo veljalo 3 Identično določilo vsebuje 1. odstavek 495. člena ZGD-1, ki prepoveduje, da se družbenikom izplača premoženje, ki je potrebno za ohranitev osnovnega kapitala. 4 Za presojanje dopustnosti izplačila je bistveno, da je odmena za izplačilo družbe bilančno ustrezna. Pri tem pa se seveda ne sme zanemariti tudi ustreznost odmene z gospodarskega vidika. 5 Glej sodbo Vrhovnega sodišča Zvezne republike Nemčije z dne 24. 11. 2003, opr. št. II ZR 171/01 ali t. i. »novembrska sodba«. 6 Kot je že bilo omenjeno, se slovenska ureditev predmetne tematike bistveno ne razlikuje od nemške. 3 drugačno stališče; kot je že bilo omenjeno, je najprej prevladovala t. i. bilančna presoja) in zato po sklepanju v skladu z načelom »in claris non fit interpretatito« (Pavčnik, 2004) lahko trdimo, da določba ni jasna in zahteva razlago. Glede na dejstvo, da je uporabljeni 30. člen GmbHG, ki ga sodišče interpretira, identičen 495. členu ZGD-1, je popolnoma na mestu sklepanje, da tudi 495. člen ZGD-1 tega izrecno ne prepoveduje, ampak je stvar sodne prakse, da ga razloži in umesti v prakso. V Nemčiji so uvideli potrebe poslovne prakse, zaradi česar so jim sledili tudi zakonodajno. Ker je stroka »novembrsko sodbo« imela za »nepravilno« oz. je spodbujala spremembo sodne prakse (Ittenbach in Eckstein, 2007), se je s spremembo oz. dopolnitvijo zakonodaje zadeva razjasnila v nasprotno smer, kot je izhajalo iz te sodbe, in so se izrecno kot dopustna določila tudi izplačila/posojila družbenikom, ki jih je sodišče z »novembrsko sodbo« izreklo za nedopustna. Z logičnim sklepanjem, da člen ni bil jasen in je potreboval interpretacijo sodišča, da je določena izplačila označilo kot dopustna ali nedopustna, lahko ugotovimo, da tudi iz določb našega ZGD-1 ne izhaja jasno, katera posojila so dovoljena in katera ne. Zato so v Nemčiji 30. člen GmbHG dopolnili tako, da ukinja dvome o razlagi te določbe in je sedaj jasno, kaj je dopustno in kaj ne, kar lahko uporabimo tudi za razjasnitev in interpretacijo 495. člena ZGD-1. Dopolnitev je sledila konec leta 2008, ko je izšla tudi prva sodba na to tematiko, t. i. »decembrska sodba«, kar je natančneje predstavljeno nekoliko kasneje. Z »novembrsko sodbo« je sodišče zavzelo stališče, da ni skladno s cilji in namenom te določbe, da bi se družbenikom dala izplačila/posojila iz premoženja, ki je potrebno za ohranitev osnovnega kapitala, in bi kot odmeno za to dobila »le« terjatev zoper posojilojemalca (naj ponovno opozorimo, da je bilo od sodišča zavzeto stališče v »novembrski sodbi« presenetljivo in nepričakovano ter tudi v stroki deležno precejšnje kritike). Na podlagi »novembrske sodbe« so torej izplačila/posojila d. o. o.-jev svojim družbenikom dovoljena le, če tudi brez uveljavljanja terjatve zoper družbenika na vračilo posojila ne posega v osnovni kapital družbe v skladu s 30. členom GmbHG. Na kratko povedano, sodišče meni, da je strogo bilančna presoja (po tej so takšna posojila dovoljena, saj dobi družba za to odmeno in gre dejansko samo za menjavo v aktivi) neustrezna z vidika ohranjanja osnovnega kapitala, zaradi česar, kot pravi sodišče, se lahko posojila dajejo le iz prostih sredstev/premoženja (rezerv). Menimo, da je stališče sodišča, da strogo bilančna presoja ni primerna, pravilno, vendar pa popolna izključitev te presoje tudi ni primerna, odstop od nje mora namreč biti izjema in ne pravilo (Zabel, 2007). Pri tem sodišče ne daje prav nobenega pomena odmeni za izplačilo/posojilo (terjatev do posojilojemalca, zastava, bančna garancija ...). Glede mnenja sodišča, da z vidika družbe ni popolnoma enako, ali ima v aktivi likvidna sredstva ali »zgolj« terjatev zoper družbenika, načeloma vlada soglasje. Tako pa ni pri odločitvi, da to takoj pomeni tudi nedopustnost izplačil/ posojil družbe, ki povzročijo takšno spremembo v aktivi, sploh če je odmena za to v obliki terjatve, ki je gospodarsko enakovredna posojilu. Glede tega stališča obstaja v stroki precej kritik (Pentz, 2005; ). V zvezi z »novembrsko sodbo« pa je pomembno dejstvo, daje sodišče zavzelo negativno stališče do mnenja nekaterih, da bi se 43. člen GmbHG, ki pravi, da so izplačila/posojila iz vezanega premoženja družbe, dana poslovodstvu, prepovedana, analogno uporabil tudi za izplačila/posojila družbenikom in povezanim družbam. Posledica kršitve nenoveliranega 30. člena GmbHG je zahtevek za vračilo po 31. členu GmbHG. V skladu s tem je treba izplačila/posojila, ki so bila izvršena v nasprotju s 30. členom GmbHG, vrniti. Če je bila posojena stvar in je ta morebiti še pri posojilojemalcu, jo mora vrniti. Tak posel, ki je v nasprotju s prepovedjo, se mora torej razveljaviti in vzpostaviti prejšnje stanje. Če to ni mogoče, lahko posojilo-dajalka zahteva denarno povračilo. Tudi znotraj ureditve v času po »novembrski« sodbi, ko je veljala precej restriktivna ureditev dajanja up-stream posojil, pa so takšna posojila obstajala. Konkretni primer takšnih posojil pri prevzemih oz. pripojitvah so obravnavali tudi nekateri nemški strokovnjaki (Streit, 2005). V enem izmed primerov, ki jih avtorja navajata, posojilo vzame ciljna družba in ga v celoti prenese na prevzemno družbo, ki nato s tem poravna kupnino. Ciljna družba seveda dobi posojilo načeloma ob dovolj visokem zavarovanju (vendar je to stvar pogajanj z banko (prvo poso-jilodajalko v verigi)). Ciljna družba v takem primeru nato sklene s prevzemno družbo posojilno pogodbo. Zavarovanja v tem razmerju se ne zahtevajo; zadostuje že sama terjatev nasproti posojilojemalki. Na podlagi pogodbe se nato posojilo prenese na prevzemno družbo, ki s tem plača nakup ciljne družbe. V primeru t. i. cash-management sistema se tekoča sredstva družb v koncernu združujejo, da s tem zagotavljajo likvidnost koncerna ter zmanjšujejo stroške financiranja. Na ta način se poskuša preprečiti, da bi bilo v okviru koncerna treba imeti na razpolago več tekočih sredstev, kot če bi obstajala zgolj ena družba. Če se v cash-management sistem vplača posojilo, ki ga je vzela ciljna družba (hči), in se nato s tem posojilom poravna kupnina za nakup hčere, gre pravno za kredit ciljne družbe prevzemni družbi oz. za ta namen ustanovljeni družbi (Engert, 2005). Zanimivo je tudi vprašanje, kako je z zahtevki zoper družbenike prevzemne družbe. GmbHG pod določenimi pogoji dopušča zahtevek neposredno zoper tretje. Če ciljna družba da določeno posojilo oz. izvrši izplačilo družbi materi, obstoji iz tega naslova zahtevek ciljne družbe do družbe matere. Če bi družba mati nato navedeno posojilo posredovala neposredno družbeniku družbe matere, pa se zahtevek lahko glasi tudi zoper njega. Ob tem avtorja v prispevku omenjata tudi nekaj modelov, ki prav tako izhajajo iz časa »novembrske« sodbe, ko je veljala nekoliko bolj restriktivna razlaga 30. člena GmbHG, ki se uporablja kot sredstvo za izognitev morebitni kršitvi določb o ohranjanju osnovnega kapitala. Eden izmed njih je na kratko predstavljen tudi v nadaljevanju. Nazadnje velja omeniti še pomembno sodbo nemškega Vrhovnega sodišča (BGH),7 v kateri se slednje opredeljuje prav do zakonskih znakov kaznivega pri izvrševanju cash poolinga. Predmetna sodba sicer ne izključuje verjetnosti obstoja zakonskih znakov kaznivega dejanja v cash-poolin-gu, vendar v sodbi izrecno navede možnost zgolj kaznivega dejanja povzročitve škode s škodljivim upravljanjem premoženja drugega (glej člen 266 nemškega kazenskega zakonika), kjer pa gre za povzročitev škode in ne pridobitve protipravne premoženjske koristi. Sledne pa je prav tisto, kar se pogosto zanemari in česar BGH ni storil, in sicer ločevanje med povzročitvijo škode in protipravno pridobitvijo premoženjske koristi. Seveda je slednja tudi mogoča, vendar mora dejansko nastati, ob tem pa morajo biti izpolnjene še vse druge predpostavke, ki jih navaja predmetni prispevek. 3.2 Poprevzemni modeli preoblikovanja Pri tem modelu se ciljna družba pripoji prevzemni družbi. Aktiva prej ciljne družbe se nato uporabi za zavarovanje posojila, ki je namenjeno financiranju pripojitve. Po opravljenem postopku pripojitve prej ciljna družba preneha obstajati. Prevzemna družba je kot polnopravna naslednica dolžnica nekdanjih upnikov ciljne družbe. Načelo ohranjanja osnovnega kapitala zato po opravljenem postopku pripojitve ne velja več za ciljno družbo, saj ta ne obstaja več. Vsekakor pa je treba paziti na ohranjanje osnovnega kapitala prevzemne družbe. Cilj te konstrukcije - zavarovanje posojila, ki ga je sprejela prevzemna družba za financiranje pripojitve, in sicer z aktivo ciljne družbe - se lahko torej izvede brez kolizije z načelom ohranjanja osnovnega kapitala. Konec leta 2008 je nato v veljavo stopil Zakon o modernizaciji prava družb z omejeno odgovornostjo in preprečevanju zlorab (MoMiG) (Das Gesetz zur Modernisierung des GmbH-Rechts und zur Bekämpfung von Missbräuchen, 2008). Zakon je GmbHG med drugim spremenil tudi v delu, ki ureja up-stream posojila. Novela je pomenila spremembo 30. člena GmbHG ter prvemu odstavku dodala še dva; prvi pravi, da ta prepoved izplačila ne velja za primer, ko je sklenjena pogodba o obvladovanju (torej obstaja pogodbeni koncern) ali pogodba o prenosu dobička oz. če je za izplačilo/posojilo dana ustrezna odmena (npr. terjatev na vračilo posojila nasproti posojilojemalcu). Stališče dveh uglednih nemških strokovnjakov na področju gospodarskega prava glede prenovljenega prava družb z omejeno odgovornostjo je (Ittenbach in Eckstein, 2007), da novi 30. člen GmbHG ne omenja kršitev zoper Glej sodbo Vrhovnega sodišča zvezne republike Nemčije z dne 31.07.2009, opr. št. 2 StR 95/09. načelo ohranjanja osnovnega kapitala, dokler je za posojilo/ izplačilo družbe njenemu družbeniku ali pool-partner-ju v koncernu dana ustrezna odmena, enakovredna višini posojila (terjatev zoper posojilojemalca, protistoritev ...). To bi pomenilo, da lahko tudi podkapitalizirana družba z omejeno odgovornostjo da posojilo svojemu družbeniku, seveda pod pogojem, da v tem trenutku obstaja terjatev za vračilo posojila, ki po višini ustreza celotnemu danemu posojilu. Ureditev temelji na prepričanju, da obstoj takšne terjatve zoper družbo posojilojemalko pomeni, da ima le-ta premoženje, ki zagotavlja odplačilo dolga in zato upniki niso bolj ogroženi, kot bi bili, če bi se posojilo dalo tretjemu. Z ozirom na to, da ne obstaja poseben predpis, ki bi določal, da je lahko odmena za dano posojilo enakovredna le-temu zgolj pri zagotovitvi zavarovanja, ki je običajno pri najemu posojila pri bankah, to pomeni, da pri izpolnitvi pogoja enakovrednosti odmene niso taksativno našteta zavarovanja, ki bi pomenila enakovrednost. Poenostavljeno rečeno, zakon ne določa taksativno, kaj mora biti dano kot odmena, da bo zagotovljeno, da ima družba premoženje za povračilo posojila. Trenutek, ki je pomemben in ključen za določanje enakovrednosti odmene (ki je v večini primerov zgolj terjatev posojilodajalke do posojilojemalke), je tisti, v katerem se posojilo daje. Kasnejši dogodki danega posojila ne morejo retroaktivno določiti kot prepovedanega; če torej odmena, dana za prejeto posojilo/izplačilo, oslabi in s tem ne ponuja več tolikšnega zavarovanja posojilodajalki, to ne spremeni dejstva, da je dano posojilo oz. izplačilo bilo in še vedno velja za pravno dopustno. Bistven za to presojo je namreč trenutek, ko je bilo posojilo dano oz. izplačilo izvršeno. Takšna razlaga izhaja tudi iz uradnega komentarja novele zakona, ki ga je podala Vlada ZRN (Heerstraßen in Nebe, 2009). Vendar je poslovodja v tem primeru dolžan poskrbeti, da se terjatev (dana odmena) čim prej uveljavi. V nasprotnem primeru odškodninsko odgovarja. Nova ureditev 30. člena GmbHG si na izrecno željo zakonodajalca prizadeva bolje urediti in omogočiti financiranje znotraj koncerna na temelju t. i. cash-poola in znotraj slednjega omogočiti delitev oz. združenje zmogljivosti podjetji. V skladu z novim GmbHG pa je mogoče tudi financiranje prevzemov, slednje seveda pod pogojem, da je terjatev družbe posojilodajalke do družbe posojilojemalke enakovredna (da je odmena enakovredna danemu posojilu). Avtorja podata naslednji praktični primer: Družba mati M, d. o. o., želi kupiti družbo hčer H, d. o. o. Kupnino bo družba M, d. o. o., plačala deloma iz lastnega premoženja, deloma iz najetega bančnega posojila. Na zahtevo M, d. o. o., prejme družba H, d. o. o., od banke posojilo, ki ga prenese na M, d. o. o., ki bo nato predmetno posojilo porabila za plačilo kupnine za prevzem H, d. o. o. Če ima družba M, d. o. o., po poplačilu vseh drugih zapadlih zahtevkov upnikov še dovolj premoženja za poplačilo zahtevka družbe H, d. o. o., je takšno financiranje popolnoma korektno in družbi H, d. o. o., pripada enakovredna terjatev zoper družbo M, d. o. o., ki se lahko upošteva v bilanci. Pred začetkom veljave novele GmbHG (MoMiG) so bile možnosti oz. okviri internega financiranja znotraj koncerna precej omejeni, predvsem zaradi znamenite »novembrske sodbe«, in na tem področju je vladala precejšnja negotovost. Po tej sodbi so bila posojila družbenikom, ki niso izhajala iz rezerv ali dobička, temveč iz vezanega premoženja družbe z omejeno odgovornostjo, nedovoljena tudi, če je bila dana odmena za posojila enakovredna danemu posojilu, kar je bilo razdelano že prej. Z novelo GmbHG (MoMiG) pa se je zakonodajalec vrnil k bilančni presoji. Spremenil se je tudi AktG (57. člen), in sicer na enak način kot GmbHG. Sledila je tudi sodna praksa: sodišče se je distanciralo od t. i. »novembrske sodbe« in odločilo v duhu nove ureditve ter v enem izmed sodnih primerov izdalo t. i. »decembrsko sodbo«.8 V predmetnem primeru je družba hči svoji materi izdala več nezavarovanih posojil (v višini več deset milijonov). Pri posojilodajalki se je začel postopek zaradi insolventnosti. Upravitelj je najprej prijavil terjatev nasproti prav tako in-solventni posojilojemalki. Zaradi nezmožnosti popolnega poplačila je vložil še odškodninsko tožbo zoper nadzorni svet, ker naj ne bi opravljal dolžnosti preverjanja sposobnosti vračanja posojila (314 AktG). V nasprotju s predhodno instanco je zvezno sodišče odločilo, da posojilo hčere družbi materi ni »per se« oškodovalni pravni posel oz. škodljivo navodilo po 311. členu AktG (sploh pa nemška stroka in sodna praksa zavzemata stališče, da se 311. člen AktG ne uporablja za dejanski d. o. o.-koncern, pri katerem obstajajo druge varovalke) (Pentz, 2005), če je bila terjatev hčere do matere v času, ko je bilo posojilo dano, enakovredna danemu posojilu. Sodišče pa opozarja, da je obveznost organov vodenja in nadzora, da preverjajo in kontrolirajo tveganje posojila, pri čemer morajo, če se to tveganje poveča, dano posojilo razveljaviti oz. zahtevati boljše zavarovanje. Opustitev teh obveznosti lahko ima za posledico odškodninske zahtevke (Kobelt, 2009). Sodišče je v tem primeru ob ugotavljanju morebitne odškodninske odgovornosti po 2. odstavku 318. člena AktG (v povezavi s 311, 317) najprej preverilo, ali nezavarovano up-stream posojilo pomeni »per se« oškodovanje družbe po 1. odstavku 311. člena AktG. Ugotovilo je, da le takrat, ko do konca poslovnega leta ni poravnan minus pri posojilodajal-ki oz. do konca poslovnega leta ni dana pravica do zahtevka po izravnavi izgube, obstoji odškodninski zahtevek zoper člane organov vodenja in nadzora. Kajti zgolj sklenitev posojilnih pogodb oz. dana posojila ne pomenijo oškodovanja, saj je bila v času danega posojila posojilojemalka popolnoma solventna in zoper njo je obstajala enakovredna terjatev. Sodišče šteje to le kot neke vrste zamenjavo aktive in se tako oprime bilančne presoje up-stream posojil. Dejstvo, da za posojilo niso bila naročena zavarovanja in da pogoji zanj niso bili primerljivi s tistimi, ki bi bili dani Glej sodbo Vrhovnega sodišča zvezne republike Nemčije z dne 1. 12. 2009, opr. št. II ZR 102/07. tretjemu, in skrben poslovodja takšnega posojila ne bi dal, še tudi ne pomeni, da je posojilo »per se« oškodovalo družbo, če ni bilo konkretnega ogrožanja premoženja ali donosa posojilodajalke. Dajanje nezavarovanih up-stream posojil kot takšno torej ni oškodovalno pravno dejanje, če so terjatve posojilodajalke do posojilojemalke enakovredne in primerno obrestovane. Sodišče se je torej izrecno distanciralo od »novembrske sodbe«. Sicer gre v omenjeni sodbi za delniški koncern, vendar teorija zastopa stališče, da to še toliko bolj velja tudi za d.o.o.-koncern (Waclawik, 2009). Sploh pa nedavna sprememba zakonodaje in ureditve t. i. up-stream posojil v Nemčiji nedvomno kaže na to, kako je treba tudi v naši zakonodaji razlagati predmetne določbe zakona ter jih uporabljati v poslovni in sodni praksi. 3.3 Škodljiva navodila v koncernsko povezanih družbah Pojem škodljivo navodilo razlaga nemška teorija zelo široko in ne zahteva prav nobene obličnosti (Kuhlmann in Ahnis, 2007). Bistveno pri tem je, ali je odvisna družba vpliv obvladujoče družbe upravičeno razumela kot navodilo za določeno ravnanje. Prav tako prevladuje stališče, da lahko navodilo izhaja od nepooblaščene osebe obvladujoče družbe, pri čemer je spet bistveno, kot kakšno in čigavo je navodilo razumela odvisna družba (Hüffer, 2012). Navodilo namreč nujno ne predstavlja pravno zavezujočega izraza volje in zaradi tega ni potrebno, da ga da za to pooblaščena oseba (Hüffer, 2012). Prav tako je lahko naslovnik navodila kdo drug kot poslovodstvo odvisne družbe, npr. zaposleni ali drugi na podrejenih mestih odvisne družbe (Hüffer, 2012). Izvor škodljivega navodila, decentralizirano vodeni koncern V hipotetičnem primeru je treba biti pozoren predvsem na naslednje: pri večstopenjskih dejanskih koncernih je treba ob upoštevanju konkretnih okoliščin posebno pozornost posvetiti vprašanju, ali je vpliv (škodljivo navodilo družbi hčeri, vnukinji ...) treba pripisati družbi materi (obvladujoča družba) ali je družba hči (odvisna družba) ravnala samostojno (Hüffer, 2012). Načeloma je najpomembneje, koga je kot dajalca navodila »videla« odvisna družba (Hüffer, 2012). Kot kakšnega bi ga morala, pa je odvisno od konkretne strukture koncerna (Hüffer, 2012). Zaradi slednjega je za prenos odgovornosti oz. obveznosti izravnave škode iz škodljivega navodila na družbo mater prostor predvsem v centralno vodenih koncernih (Wimmer, 2004). Zgolj koncernska povezanost kot takšna pa še ne pomeni, da je navodilo družbe hčere vnukinji dejansko navodilo družbe matere (Kuhlmann in Ahnis, 2007). Takšno sklepanje bi bilo preširoko, sploh za decentralizirano vodene koncerne (Wimmer, 2004). Sicer bi to lahko sledilo iz načela enotnega vodenja, vendar se tudi tega ne sme razumeti absolutno, ampak bolj v smislu skupne politike, znotraj katere pa družbe ravnajo tudi samoiniciativno in samostojno. Družba mati (v dejanskem koncernu) odvisnim družbam namreč lahko daje zgolj smernice, v okviru katerih pa odvisne družbe ravnajo pravno samostojno (navodilu niso dolžne slediti) (Meyer, 2000). Družba mati zato ni seznanjena z vsakim navodilom, ki ga družba hči da družbi vnukinji, in zaradi tega za to tudi ne nosi odgovornosti (Kuhlmann in Ahnis, 2007). Pomembno je torej, kdo je realni nosilec vpliva oz. tisti, v čigar interesu je bila pobuda za škodljiv posel dana, ter odgovornost za posledice pripisati le tisti družbi, od katere navodilo neposredno izhaja (Kocbek, 2010). Koncern v koncernu je treba razumeti drugače kot decentralizirano vodeni koncern, v katerem še vedno velja enotno vodenje iz vrha koncerna, ki pa je v decentralizirano vodenem koncernu le bolj široko zastavljeno in zato dopušča več samostojnosti posameznim delom koncerna. Pri koncernu v koncernu pa dejansko obstaja znotraj koncerna t. i. podkoncern. Če bi to priznavali, bi bila razdelitev odgovornosti veliko lažja. Vendar naj bi nemška literatura to v večinskem delu zavračala, kar se tiče področja prava družb oz. korporacijskega prava (Roder, Powietzka, 2004). 3.4 Stanje in stališča v slovenski praksi Dajanje posojil v koncernsko povezanih družbah (hči -vnukinja materi v večstopenjskem dejanskem koncernu), imenovano cash pooling, ne predstavlja samo po sebi protipravnega ali celo kaznivega dejanja. Osnovno vprašanje je torej: Kdo, če sploh kdo, je imel korist od posojil, danih družbam v konkretnem primeru? Menimo, da nekatera stališča slovenske prakse, da je posojilo, dano družbi, mogoče dejansko šteti kot posojilo fizični osebi zgolj zaradi tega, ker je morebiti imela posredno namen iz takšnega posojila na koncu profitirati kot fizična oseba, ne upoštevajo že temeljev prava kapitalskih družb, katerega osnovno načelo je ločevanje premoženja družbe od premoženja njenih družbenikov (teorija namembnega premoženja). Zaradi tega je dostop družbenikov do kapitala družbe urejen skrajno restriktivno, kar je posebej očitno v pravu delniških družb. S tem seveda ne trdimo, da niso mogoče zlorabe, a vendar zgolj želja ali namen, ravnati s premoženjem družbe kot s svojim lastnim, ne zadostuje za sklepanje, ki ga pogosto uporabi tožilstvo. Še manj pa bi držalo, da se z najetim kreditom poveča premoženje posameznega družbenika oz. delničarja, saj najprej povečanje premoženja družbe ne pomeni povečanja premoženja posameznega družbenika in dalje s tem nastane tudi terjatev dajalca kredita do kreditojemalca, zaradi česar najem kredita pod normalnimi pogoji ne pomeni povečanja premoženja družbe (Miller, 2004). V nemški teoriji so takšna posojila (upstream loans) nekaj vsakdanjega in dopustnega (Georg, 2011).9 Tudi iz sodne prakse, omenjene v prejšnji opombi, izhaja, da Glej sodbo Vrhovnega sodišča Zvezne republike Nemčije z dne 24.11.2003, opr. št. II ZR 171/01 in z dne 1.12.2008, opr. št. II ZR 102/07. posojilo, dano družbi materi od družbe hčere, ne pomeni niti zmanjšanja niti povečanja premoženja, temveč zgolj t. i. »Aktivtausch«, torej zamenjavo aktive, saj namesto zneska kredita nastopi terjatev do posojilojemalca in obratno na strani posojilojemalca. Družba, ki je prejela posojilo, s tem ni ustvarila čistega presežka premoženja v smislu Kazenskega zakonika. Sploh pa »povečanje« premoženja na eni strani nosi terjatev posojilodajalca do posojilojemalca na drugi strani. Kredit kot tak torej sploh ne predstavlja povečanja premoženja družbe. Na podlagi logičnega sklepanja torej težko pridemo do ugotovitve, da je lahko matična družba, ki se ji premoženje sploh ni povečalo oz. posojilo ni rezultiralo v čistem presežku premoženja, predstavlja izvor povečanja premoženja družbam, ki so imetnice njenih delnic, in še manj fizičnim osebam, ki so imetniki deležev družb, ki so zgolj posredne imetnice delnic družbe, iz katere naj bi to povečanje premoženja izhajalo. Nekoliko lahkomiselno se zato v praksi izpeljuje sklep, da je z vsakim posojilom, ki so ga na neposredno ali posredno zahtevo članov organa vodenja morale družbe iz skupine matice (večstopenjski dejanski koncern) odobriti družbi materi, obogatela v končni fazi družba, ki je bila krovna koncernska družba že omenjenega večstopenjskega koncerna. V praksi se prav tako nepotrebno zatrjuje, da za vsako gospodarsko družbo stoji vsaj ena fizična oseba, ki pa naj bi pridobila zato protipravno premoženjsko korist. Takšno sklepanje seveda ni na mestu, saj se pozablja najprej na ločevanje premoženja družbe od premoženja njenih družbenikov, zaradi česar povečanje premoženja družbe še ne pomeni povečanja premoženja njenih družbenikov oz. delničarjev. Menimo, da takšno pavšalno zatrjevanje brez argumentov in zgolj z domnevami, da je z vsakim posojilom družbam znotraj koncerna obogatela končna krovna družba, ki je njihova posredna »lastnica«, in s tem tudi fizična oseba kot imetnica deležev te družbe, z ničimer ni pojasnjeno, na kakšen način je ta presežek prišel do posamezne fizične osebe in kdaj je bil viden na njegovem transakcijskem računu oz. v njegovem zasebnem premoženju in ne zgolj premoženju družbe. Ponovno namreč poudarjamo ločevanje premoženja družbe od premoženja njenih družbenikov, kar je treba upoštevati na vseh ravneh konkretnega koncerna. Dodatno pa je treba upoštevati tudi dejstvo, da določena fizična oseba v družbi lahko nastopa kot direktor in tudi družbenik. Za prvega so predpostavke za očitanje protipravno pridobljene premoženjske koristi še strožje, saj je v primeru čistega presežka premoženja jasno, da ima direktor dejansko oblast nad tem denarjem, saj vodi posle družbe, zaradi česar mora biti dodatno izkazana tudi dejanska korist. Pri družbeniku se pojavi vprašanje že pri dejanski oblasti, če je podana, saj seveda spet pridemo do vprašanja o dejanski koristi. Ker fizična oseba nastopa v obeh vlogah hkrati, je seveda bistveno vprašanje, ali je od posojil podrejenih družb družbam materam imela fizična oseba in družbenik kakršno koli korist. Pri tem ne zadošča, da je prednost pri premoženju pridobila krovna družba, saj ne zadostuje zgolj možnost, da si bi družbenik dobiček lahko izplačal.10 Slednje je predpostavka, da lahko sploh govorimo o možnosti protipravno pridobljene premoženjske koristi. Takšnega mnenja je tudi nemško vrhovno sodišče v več odločitvah.11 Dodatna težava pa nastane, če so posamezne družbe, ki so bile prejemnice posojil, zašle v insolventno stanje. Ker je mogoče ugotoviti, da se nobeni izmed družb s prejetim posojilom v nobenem trenutku ni ustvaril čisti presežek premoženja, ampak sta družbi postali insolventni, iz takšnega posojila težko izhaja tudi povečanje premoženja krovne družbe, kar seveda »per se« izključuje tudi možnost povečanja premoženja fizične osebe kot imetnika deležev krovne družbe na podlagi teh posojil. Morebiti je bil namen posojil takšen, a protipravno pridobljena premoženjska korist mora biti dejansko izkazana v čistem presežku premoženja, ki pa ga v konkretnem primeru nedvomno ni bilo oz. ga niti ni moglo biti. Dvomi se pojavljajo tudi pri vprašanju dejanske oblasti fizične osebe nad premoženjem družb obvladujočih družb. Ne glede na to, da gre za dejanski koncern, v katerem poznamo t. i. koncernski privilegij, ki omogoča dajanje škodljivih navodil, le-tem poslovodstvo odvisnih družb ni dolžno slepo slediti. Vendar je to vprašanje v posameznem primeru nerelevantno, saj je pomembno, ali je sploh nastal čisti presežek premoženja. Če bi, bi bila tudi na tem nivoju potrebna temeljita analiza upravljavskih odnosov znotraj 10 Glej obvestilo Ustavnega sodišča Zvezne republike Nemčije, 9. 6. 2006, opr. št. 50/06. 11 Glej sodbo Vrhovnega sodišča Zvezne republike Nemčije z dne 28. 10. 2010, opr. št. 4 StR 215/10, v kateri sodišče izrecno razsodi sledeče: »Nach der Rechtsprechung des Bundesgerichtshofs ist ein Vermögenswert aus der Tat erlangt im Sinne des § 73 Abs. 1 Satz 1 StGB, wenn er dem Täter oder Teilnehmer unmittelbar aus der Verwirklichung des Tatbestands in irgendeiner Phase des Tatablaufs zugeflossen ist (BGH, Urteile vom 30. Mai 2008 - 1 StR 166/07, BGHSt 52, 227, 246; vom 29. Juni 2010 - 1 StR 245/09), er an ihm also unmittelbar aus der Tat (tatsächliche, aber nicht notwendig rechtliche) Verfügungsmacht gewonnen und dadurch einen Vermögenszuwachs erzielt hat (vgl. BGH, Urteil vom 16. Mai 2006 - 1 StR 46/06, BGHSt 51, 65, 68; Beschluss vom 21. Oktober 2008 - 4 StR 437/08, NStZ 2010, 85; Urteil vom 4. Februar 2009 - 2 StR 504/08, JZ 2009, 1124 m. Anm. Rönnau m. w. N.)); BVerfG, odločitev z dne 9. 6. 2006 - 50/06: Der Vermögenszuwachs muss dem Täter auf irgendeine Weise wirtschaftlich zu Gute kommen. Das kann nicht ohne weiteres vorausgesetzt werden, wenn der Täter als Beauftragter, Vertreter oder Organ einer juristischen Person gehandelt hat und der Vorteil aus der Straftat in deren Vermögen fließt. Regelmäßig ist vielmehr davon auszugehen, dass die juristische Person über eine eigene Vermögensmasse verfügt, die von dem Privatvermögen des Beauftragten, Vertreters oder Organs zu trennen ist. Zur Begründung einer Verfallsanordnung gegen den als Organ einer Gesellschaft handelnden Täter bedarf es der Feststellung, ob dieser selbst etwas erlangt hat, das zu einer Änderung seiner Vermögensbilanz geführt hat. Wird der Vermögensvorteil von der Gesellschaft vereinnahmt, kann nicht ohne weiteres vorausgesetzt werden, dass der wirtschaftliche Wert der Geschäftsanteile im Privatvermögen des Täters steigt oder dass sich der Zufluss auf die Höhe einer späteren Entnahme aus dem Gesellschaftsvermögen auswirkt.) koncerna, da bi se ugotovila dejanska oblast nad premoženjem družb v koncernu. Hkrati pa je treba z gotovostjo ugotoviti, ali je bila izkazana neposredna premoženjska korist potencialnega storilca. 4 Namesto sklepa Iz vsega navedenega v prispevku jasno sledi, da mora tožilstvo domnevnemu storilcu kaznivega dejanja dokazati čisti presežek premoženja (neposredno korist), pri tem pa slednje ne sme temeljiti zgolj na domnevah (poleg vseh drugih elementov za obstoj kaznivega dejanja). To seveda ne zadostuje, saj mora biti presežek dejansko razviden in na voljo predmetnemu subjektu. Hkrati s tem je pomembna ugotovitev, da je nujno treba ločevati med vprašanjem o civilni povzročitvi škode (do katerega se v tem prispevku ne opredeljujemo) in protipravno pridobljeni premoženjski koristi, pri katerem mora korist dejansko in neposredno nastati. Tako v analiziranih primerih s prejetimi posojili dejansko v nobenem trenutku sploh ni nastal čisti presežek premoženja družb posojilojemalk. Slednje pa je seveda pogoj, da lahko sploh govorimo o čistem presežku premoženja njunih družbenikov in posledično protipravno pridobljeni premoženjski koristi. Že zaradi tega seveda o slednji sploh ni mogoče govoriti. Popolnoma drugačno težo pa bi lahko imelo morebitno uveljavljanje odškodninskih zahtevkov zoper domnevne povzročitelje škodnega dogodka. Zgolj dejstvo o obstoju škodnega dogodka ali protipravnem ravnanju v civilno-pravnem pomenu pa »per se« še ne more predstavljati obstoja kakršnega koli kaznivega dejanja, temveč je treba zadevo v vseh pogledih tudi ustrezno argumentirati in dokazati. Pri tem zgolj sklicevanje na kršitev civilnih predpisov ni zadosten dokaz za obstoj kaznivega dejanja, temveč zgolj element protipravnosti v smislu odškodninske (civilne) odgovornosti. Pa vendar, če (napačno) predpostavljamo, da je takšna korist na strani družb posojilojemalk v nekem trenutku dejansko obstajala, to zaradi temeljnega načela ločevanja premoženja družbe od premoženja njenih družbenikov še ne pomeni povečanja čistega presežka premoženja njenih družbenikov (teorija namembnega premoženja). Drugačno sklepanje je napačno, kar izrecno potrjujeta tudi nemška teorija in sodna praksa, ki ju je nujno treba upoštevati, saj gre za osnovne postulate korporacijskega prava, ki veljajo tudi pri nas, in še več, izhajajo med drugim iz nemške kor-poracijskopravne ureditve. Za takšno povečanje bi morali omenjeni družbi na neki način izplačati domnevni čisti presežek premoženja svojim družbenikom oz. družbeniku. 5 Viri 1. Bavcon, I. in Šelih, A. (2003). Kazensko pravo, splošni del (str. 496). Ljubljana: Založba Uradni list RS. 2. Bele, I. (2001). Kazenski zakonik s komentarjem, Splošni del (str. 512). Ljubljana: GV Založba. 3. Bittmann, F. (2004). Insolventstrafrecht, Handbuch fur die Praxis (str. 748). Berlin: De Gruyter Rechtswissenschaften Verlags-GmbH. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110917628 4. Das Gesetz zur Modernisierung des GmbH-Rechts und zur Bekämpfung von Missbräuchen (MoMiG). (2008). 5. Engert, A. (2005). Kreditgewährung an GmbHGesellschafter und bilanzorientierter Kapitalschutz. Betriebs Berater, 2005 (60), 1951-1958. 6. Georg, D.. (2011). Gesellschafterdarlehen in der Insolvenz (str. 186). Berlin: Lit Verlag Dr. W. Hopf. 7. Gesetz betreffend die Gesellschaften mit beschränkter Haftung (GmbHG). (2010). 8. Heerstraßen, F. in Nebe, F. (2009). Cash Pooling after the Reform of the German Act on Limited Liability Companies (GmbHG). Pridobljeno 19.09.2012 s http:// www.loschelder.de/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/ pdf/aktuelles/2009/2009-01_DetailsAktuell.pdf. 9. Henn, G. in Frodermann, J. (2009). Handbuch des Aktienrechts, 8., völlig neu bearbeitete und erweiterte Auflage (str. 868), Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, Verlagsgruppe in Jehle Rehm GmbH. 10. Hüffer. U. (2012). Akitengesetz, 10. izdaja (1691). München: C. H. Beck. 11. Ittenbach, J. H. in Eckstein, P. (2007). Modernisierung des GmbH-Rechts (MoMiG). Pridobljeno 07.12.2012, s http://www.heimes-mueller.de/1778_Microsoft_Word_-_ Vortrag_MoMiG_UG__PE-4A92A0C309C54DE4A-7C37F6D7EA91C01_D0C.pdf 12. Kazenski zakonik (KZ-1-UPB2). (2012). 13. Kobelt, R. (2009). Corporate-Governance-Forum, Informationen für Aufsichtsrat und Prüfungsausschuss. Pridobljeno 17.05.2012 s http://www.deloitte.com/assets/ Dcom-Germany/Local%20Content/Articles/Janett/WP_ NL_CorporateGovernanceForum_1_2009_dN_D.pdf. 14. Kocbek, M. (ur.). (2007). Veliki komentar ZGD-1, 3. knjiga (str. 130). Ljubljana: GV Založba. 15. Kocbek, M. (2010). Odškodninski in drugi zahtevki znotraj povezanih družb v dejanskem ter pogodbenem koncernu. Pridobljeno 09.01.2013 s http://www.iusinfo.si/ Lite/Besedilo.aspx?S0PI=L030Y2010V7P987N1. 16. Kuhlmann, J in Ahnis, E. (2007). Konzern- und Umwandlungsrecht, 2., neu bearbeitete und erweiterte Auflage (str. 55). Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, Verlagsgruppe Jehle Rehm GmbH. 17. Meyer, J. (2000). Haftungsbeschränkung im Recht der Handelsgesellschaften (str. 934). Berlin: Springer Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58321-6 18. Miller, A. (2004). Das Umweltstrafrecht im Konigsreich Spanien und der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung unter besonderer Berucksichtigung der Verwaltungsakzessorietat, der Am-tstragerstrafbarkeit und der Unternehmensstrafbarkeit. Doktorska disertacija.. Münster: Lit Verlag Münster. 19. Nestler, N. (2010). Verfall und Einziehung, Vorlesung Wirtschaftsrecht. Pridobljeno 11.12.2012, s http://www. unicreditbank.si/sl/Pravne_osebe/Upravljanje_z_ denarnimi_sredstvi/Zdruzevanje_denarnih_sredstev_ cash_pooling. 20. Pavčnik, M. (2004). Argumentacija v pravu, 2. izdaja (str. 315). Ljubljana: Cankarjeva založba - Pravna obzorja. 21. Pentz, A. (2005). Cash-Pooling im Konzern, Ökonomische und juristische Hinweise für die Praxis. Pridobljeno 10.10.2012, s http://www.boeckler.de/pdf/p_edition_ hbs_139.pdf. 22. Röder, G. in Powietzka, A.. (2004). Gesamt- und Konzernbetriebsräte in internationalen Konzernunternehmen. Der Betrieb, 2004 (10), 542-547. 23. Schilmar, B. (2004). Kapitalerhaltung versus Konzernfinanzierung? Cash Pooling un Upstream-Besicherung im Lichte der neusten BGH-Rechtsprechung. Der Betrieb, 2004 (26), 1411-1416. 24. Schmidt, K.(2002). Gesellschaftsrecht, 4. izdaja (str. 1134). Köln: Založba Heymann GmbH. 25. Streit, G. in Schäffler, F. (2005). Rechtliche Grenzen der Nutzung des Vermögens derZielgesellschaft zur Finanzierung von LBO-Transaktionen. Pridobljeno 14.04.2012, s http://www.boeckler.de/pdf/mbf_gutachten_ schaeffler_2007.pdf. 26. Waclawik, E. Kontrierung der Upstream-Finanzierung im faktsichem Konzern (2009), Zum Urteil des BGH vom 1. Dezember 2008 - II ZR 102/07, DB 2009, 106. Pridobljeno 14.09.2009 s http://www.waclawik-bghanwalt.de/veroef-fentlichungen/vo_ew25_c.htm 27. Wimmer-Leonhardt, S. (2004). Konzernhaftungsrecht (str. 119). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. 28. Zakon o gospodarskih družbah (ZGD-1-UPB3). (2009). Dušan Jovanovič, doktor pravnih znanosti, je docent za področje gospodarskega prava na Ekonomsko-poslovni fakulteti Univerze v Mariboru. Izpopolnjeval se je predvsem na Pravni fakulteti Univerze v Mariboru in na tujih izobraževalnih ustanovah (College of Law University of Cincinnati, Kingston University London, Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu). Je član Pravniškega društva v Mariboru in član svetovnega združenja International Bar Association. V svojih strokovnih in znanstvenih razpravah ter člankih se ukvarja predvsem s področjem korpora-cijskega prava in korporacijskega upravljanja. Je avtor in soavtor več publikacij v slovenskem prostoru in tudi v tujini. Sodeluje pri različnih raziskovalnih projektih s področja korporacijskega prava ter kot predavatelj na različnih strokovnih seminarjih in posvetovanjih. Kot neodvisen in korporacijski strokovnjak je član nadzornih svetov gospodarskih družb, sodeluje pa tudi pri delu različnih državnih in nedržavnih organov in institucij s svojega področja. Dušan Jovanovič is a doctor of law and an assistant professor of corporate law at the University of Maribor, Faculty of Economics and Business. He acquired his knowledge especially at the University of Maribor, College of Law, University of Cincinnati, College of Law, Kingston University London, and University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law. Dr. Jovanovič is a member of the Society of Lawyers in Maribor and a member of the worldwide International Bar Association. In his expert and scientific discussions and articles, Dr. Jovanovič mainly addresses corporate law issues. He is the author and co-author of a number of publications in Slovenia and abroad, while he also takes part in various research projects regarding corporate law and, as a guest lecturer, lectures at numerous expert conferences and consultations. As an independent and corporate expert, Dr. Jovanovič is a member of supervisory boards of Slovenian corporations and cooperates with different state and non-state bodies and institutions from his area of work. Miha Bratina je bil rojen leta 1986. Leta 2010 je z odliko diplomiral na Pravni fakulteti v Ljubljani. Na isti fakulteti nadaljuje podiplomski študij gospodarskega prava za pridobitev naziva doktor pravnih znanosti, vzporedno pa kot štipendist Fundacije Parus končuje magistrski študijski program gospodarskega prava in prestrukturiranja (LL.M.) na School of Tax and Business Law na Pravni fakulteti Univerze v Münstru (Nemčija). Kot pravnik je deloval tudi v nekaterih mednarodnih odvetniških pisarnah in gospodarskih družbah. Miha Bratina was born in 1986 and graduated "cum laude" from the University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Law in 2010. He is currently earning his PhD degree in commercial law at the same faculty as well as his LLM degree in commercial law and restructuring from the School of Tax and Business Law, Faculty of Law, University of Münster (Germany) as a Parus Foundation scholarship recipient. As a lawyer, he has also been active in several international law offices and companies. IZVIRNI ZNANSTVENI ČLANEK - ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER UPORABA ORODIJ MENEDZMENTA IN DODANA VREDNOST V SLOVENSKIH INVALIDSKIH PODJETJIH The Use of Management Tools and Added Value in Slovenian Disabled Enterprises Prejeto/Received: November 2012 Popravljeno/Revised: Januar 2013 Sprejeto/Accepted: Januar 2013 Gorazd Šoster Center ISI invalidsko pod¡et¡e, d. o. o., Štore gorazd.soster@center-isi.si Mirko Markič Univerza na Primorskem, Fakulteta za management mirko.markic@fm-kp.si Izvleček Namen raziskave je ugotoviti stanje pri načrtovanju in uporabi menedžerskih orodij v invalidskih podjetjih, ki poslujejo v Republiki Sloveniji. Ugotavljali smo, ali obstaja statistično značilna korelacija med načrtovanjem uporabe in uporabo menedžment-skih orodij ter dodano vrednostjo. Ugotovili smo, da z načrtovanjem in uporabo menedžerskih orodij podjetja ne dosegajo višje dodane vrednosti. Menedžersko orodje, katerega uporaba je povezana s povečanjem dodane vrednosti, je EFQM. Bistvene prednosti uporabe menedžerskih orodij so izboljšanje preglednosti procesov, višja kakovost proizvodov, večje zadovoljstvo odjemalcev in izboljšanje ugleda podjetja. Izidi iz raziskave bodo koristni za vse, ki si prizadevajo za nenehno izboljšanje uspešnosti poslovanja. Ključne besede: anketa, dodana vrednost, invalidsko podjetje, menedžment, mene-džerska orodja, uspešnost Abstract The purpose of the survey is to establish the state in planning and use of management tools in disabled enterprises operating in the Republic of Slovenia. We investigated if a statistically significant correlation exists between planning and using the management tools and the added value. We found that disabled enterprises that are planning and implementing management tools do not achieve higher added value. The management tool connected to the increase of the added value is the EFQM. The essential advantages of using the management tools are: improved transparency of the processes, better quality of products, greater customer satisfaction, and improved reputation of the company. The conclusions of the survey will be useful to those who strive for continuous improvement of business efficiency. Keywords: survey, added value, disabled enterprise, management, management tools, efficiency 1 Uvod Spremembe so v času burnih preobratov postale pravilo. Vsako podjetje, ki hoče preživeti, jih mora celo spodbujati in iz njih ustvariti priložnosti, prepoznati mora koristne spremembe, ki bodo učinkovite tako znotraj kot tudi zunaj podjetja. Izpeljava in usmerjanje sprememb je zahtevna in naporna naloga, ki je za menedžerje postala eden glavnih izzivov (Pettigrew idr. 2001). Usmerjevalci sprememb bodo edini, ki bodo preživeli, zato pa morajo slediti vodilom za oblikovanje prihodnosti, razvijati načrtne metode za iskanje in predvidevanje sprememb, nenehno preizkušati, kateri je pravi način za uvajanje sprememb znotraj in zunaj podjetja, ter znati vzdrževati ravnovesje med spreminjanjem Naše gospodarstvo / Our Economy Vol. 59, No. 1-2, 2013 pp. 35-44 DOI: 10.7549/ourecon.2013.1-2.04 UDK: 005.3:331.5-056.26 JEL: M21 in kontinuiteto (Drucker 1999). Za pomoč menedžerjem pri uvajanju sprememb je bil predvsem v preteklih petdesetih letih razvit širok nabor različnih menedžerskih orodij, ki je nastal iz potrebe po uspešnem vodenju in prilagajanju vse hitreje rastočemu trgu (Pascale 1991, Daft 2000). Izbrana menedžerska orodja naj bi jim omogočala boljše poslovne odločitve in učinkovito doseganje smotrov in ciljev za kar največ udeležencev (Biloslavo 2008). Pogoj za uspešno uporabo teh orodij je razumevanje vsakega izmed njih z vsemi njegovimi prednostmi in slabostmi. Zato samo eno popolno menedžersko orodje ne obstaja, ključno je razumevanje menedžerjev, katero izbrati ter kako in kdaj ga uporabiti (Rigby 2001). Po raziskavi o konkurenčnosti slovenskih podjetij je bilo v primerjavi z vodilnimi svetovnimi podjetji ugotovljeno, da menedžment v slovenskih podjetjih ocenjuje, da je njihov največji zaostanek za tujimi podjetji prav pri uporabi sodobnih menedžerskih orodij, kar ima tudi neposredne gospodarske učinke, saj ustvarjajo prenizko dodano vrednost (Ložar 2009). V raziskavi, ki jo je Ložar izvedel v 300 največjih slovenskih podjetjih, je avtor ugotovil, da imajo slovenska podjetja največje zaostanke za primerljivimi svetovnimi multinacionalkami pri produktivnosti, pri stroških dela (tuja podjetja imajo za 14,1 % nižje stroške dela v dodani vrednosti od slovenskih) in pri dodani vrednosti, ki je pri tujih podjetjih kar za 118 % višja od primerljivih slovenskih. Bukovec in Markič (2008) sta raziskovala stopnjo integracije različnih menedžmentskih modelov v slovenskih organizacijah. Ugotovila sta, da so najbolj integrirani modeli sitem vodenja kakovosti (ISO 9001), model odličnosti (EFQM), 20 ključev, reinženiring (BPR), uravnoteženi sistem kazalnikov BSC in six sigma. Najbolj prepoznan je model ISO 9001, stopnja integracije EFQM je nizka. Ugodno je stanje pri modelu 20 ključev, BPR, BSC in six sigma se malo uporabljajo. V neprofitnih organizacijah več uporabljajo BSC kot BPR, v neprofitnih in storitvenih organizacijah pa je opazno odklonilno stališče do 20 ključev, BSC, six sigma in BPR. V raziskavi o uporabi menedžerskih orodij v svetovnem merilu (Rigby in Bilodeau 2007) ugotavljajo, da v večjih podjetjih uporabljajo več orodij kot v majhnih. Menedžer-ji so najbolj zadovoljni z uporabo orodij strateškega načrtovanja, zaznan pa je bil velik padec pri uporabi zunanjega izvajanja dejavnosti (predvsem v Severni Ameriki). Najbolj uporabljani menedžerski orodji sta primerjalno presojanje (benchmarking) in strateško načrtovanje. V Sloveniji obstaja zakonska možnost, da gospodarska družba pridobi status invalidskega podjetja (v nadaljevanju IP), če izpolnjuje določene zahteve na področju zaposlovanja in usposabljanja invalidov. IP tako predstavljajo pomembno možnost zagotavljanja delovnih mest za invalide, saj jim omogočajo socialno varnost in vključenost. Zaradi tega so to gospodarske družbe posebnega pomena. Nastop teh podjetij na trgu se ne razlikuje od nastopa drugih gospodarskih družb, tudi njihov namen je, da dolgoročno povečujejo svojo uspešnost. Zaznani problem je po našem mnenju v tem, da slovenski IP niso dovolj uspešni. Kljub državni pomoči jih četrtina posluje z izgubo (MDDSZ 2009). Predvidevamo, da je pomemben razlog za takšno stanje ta, da menedžment v IP menedžerskih orodij ne pozna dovolj, jih premalo uporablja ali ne načrtuje njihove uporabe. Smiselno je raziskati obseg poznavanja in razširjenost uporabe menedžerskih orodij v IP in njihovo povezavo z uspešnostjo, izraženo z ustvarjeno dodano vrednostjo. Dodana vrednost na zaposlenega ni v neposredni in popolni korelaciji z izidom poslovanja, je pa pomembno sredstvo za merjenje izidov podjetij (Ghalayini 1996). Kazalniki uspeha so lahko tudi odlična kakovost proizvodov, absentizem (v IP izražen v veliki meri), fluktua-cija, zadovoljstvo pri delu, inoviranje, motivacija, morala, nadzor, konflikti, kohezija, prilagodljivost in adaptacija, poškodbe pri delu, izobrazba in razvoj, človeške zmogljivosti, etično ravnanje in verodostojnost organizacije, dobavna in servisna pripravljenost, odnos do naravnega in družbenega okolja, humanizacija dela in odnosov, rentabilnost, aku-mulativnost itd. (Ferreira in Otley 2009). De Waal (2003) je še konkretneje raziskoval dejavnike uspešnosti v organizacijah in ugotovil, da poleg finančnih kazalnikov (kot so npr. rast dohodka, dobičkonosnost, rast prodaje, povrnitev investicije ipd.) obstajajo tudi nefinančni (npr. zadovoljstvo odjemalcev, njihova lojalnost, lojalnost sodelavcev ter kakovost proizvoda in procesa). Na podlagi ugotovitev iz pregleda domače in tuje strokovne literature smo se odločili, da bomo iz nabora menedžerskih orodij preverjali načrtovanje in uporabo naslednjih: standarde serije ISO 9000: enotni, mednarodni standardi menedžmenta kakovosti kot vodilo za vodenje procesov, s katerimi naj bi zagotavljali, da proizvodi in procesi ustrezajo zahtevam odjemalcev (Bernus 2003, Piskar in Dolinšek 2006); EFQM: poslovno-organizacijski model spodbujanja nenehnega izboljševanja, temelječega na učenju in inovativnosti, ki so ga oblikovali v European Foundation for Quality Management (Samuelsson in Nilsson 2002); sistem 20 ključev: edinstven in praktičen sistem za dolgoročno uspešen in celovit razvoj podjetij in orodje za ocenjevanje kakovosti delovnega okolja z 20 med seboj povezanimi tehnikami in izboljšavami oz. ključi (Kobayashi 1995); uravnoteženi sistem kazalnikov (balanced scorecard, BSC): menedžerski poslovno-organizacijski model strateškega načrtovanja in uravnoteženih kazalnikov (Kaplan in Norton 1992); six sigma: poslovno-organizacijski sistem nenehnih izboljšav, s pomočjo katerega se v organizacijah osredotočajo na zmanjšanje števila napak in na razvoj proizvajanja, temelji pa na statistični kontroli procesov (Pande idr. 2000); BPR (business process reengineering): radikalna preureditev poslovnih procesov, ki dramatično izboljša kakovost, zniža stroške in poveča hitrost proizvodnje (Hammer in Champy 1993); strateško načrtovanje: obsežen in sistematičen proces, s katerim opredelimo predvidevanja v prihodnjem obdobju na načine, kako bomo dosegli zastavljene cilje (Hamel in Prahalad 1994); primerjalno presojanje (benchmarking): stalen proces GORAZD ŠOSTER, MlRKO MaRKIČ: UPORABA ORODIj MENEDZMENTA IN DODANA VREDNOST V SLOVENSKIH INVALIDSKIH PODjETjIH merjenja proizvodov in procesov ter njihovo primerjanje z najboljšimi konkurenti oz. najboljšimi organizacijami (Daft 2008); segmentiranje odjemalcev (customer segmentation): proces ločevanja odjemalcev ali potencialnih odjemalcev na različne skupine ali segmente z namenom prepoznavanja potreb odjemalcev in pridobitve konkurenčne prednosti (McDonald in Dunbar 2004); CRM (customer relationship management): koncept sodobnega trženja kot celovitega procesa izgradnje in vzdrževanja dobičkonosnih odnosov z odjemalci (Kotler in Armstrong 2006); zunanje izvajanje dejavnosti (outsourcing): oddana, izločena, prestavljena izbrana poslovna funkcija, dejavnost, storitev ali program, ki jo ali ga za naročnika izvajajo zunanji izvajalci (Kavčič in Tavčar 2008); prebojne inovacije: z njimi izpodrinemo obstoječe poslovne modele z ustvarjanjem enostavnejših, cenejših in prijaznejših izdelkov, storitev ali procesov, ki se kažejo včasih kot radikalen preboj, včasih pa kot prednost v poslovnem modelu podjetja (Burns in Stalker 2001). Namen raziskave je ugotoviti stanje pri načrtovanju in uporabi menedžerskih orodij v invalidskih podjetjih, ki poslujejo v Republiki Sloveniji. Raziskali bomo tudi, ali obstaja statistično značilna korelacija med načrtovanjem uporabe in uporabo menedžerskih orodij in dodano vrednostjo ter katere so ključne prednosti uporabe teh orodij. Iz teoretičnih izhodišč in opisa problematike smo oblikovali naslednje hipoteze: - H1: Med načrtovanjem in uporabo menedžerskih orodij ter dodano vrednostjo invalidskih podjetij obstaja povezava. - H2: Med vzroki za spodbudo k uporabi menedžerskih orodij in razširjenostjo njihove uporabe ter med vzroki za spodbudo k uporabi teh orodij in dodano vrednostjo invalidskih podjetij obstajata povezavi. - H3: Povečanje uspešnosti poslovanja IP ni ključna prednost uporabe menedžerskih orodij. V nadaljevanju prispevka bomo predstavili uporabljeno metodologijo, podali ključne izide iz raziskave ter opravili razpravo. 2 Metodologija V osnovi je šlo za kvantitativno metodo raziskovanja, kot jo opredeljujejo Easterby-Smith, Thorpe in Jackson (2009). Kot pripomoček za pridobivanje podatkov in informacij smo uporabili vprašalnik. Zaradi večje veljavnosti in zanesljivosti raziskave smo ga testirali pri desetih direktorjih IP in njihove pripombe smiselno upoštevali pri končnem oblikovanju anketnega vprašalnika. Pri testiranju vprašalnika smo ugotovili, da direktorji prepoznajo dodano vrednost kot primeren kazalnik uspešnosti poslovanja podjetja, znana pa jim je bila tudi višina dodane vrednosti v dejavnosti, v kateri IP delujejo. Anketni vprašalnik Za zbiranje podatkov in informacij smo oblikovali vprašalnik, na katerem smo zasnovali kvantitativno raziskavo. Prvi del vprašalnika je splošni del. Z njim smo pridobili splošne podatke o podjetju, med drugim tudi o ustvarjeni dodani vrednosti na zaposlenega, s katerimi bomo primerjali informacije, prejete z odgovori na vprašanja o uporabi menedžerskih orodij, ki so zasnovana v naslednjih treh sklopih. Drugi del vprašalnika smo povzeli po raziskavi, v kateri so proučevali pristop k obvladovanju organizacijskih sprememb v slovenskih podjetjih (Bukovec in Markič 2008). V tem delu vprašalnika smo spraševali po dejanskem in želenem stanju pri obvladovanju organizacijskih sprememb v IP. V tretjem delu vprašalnika smo direktorje spraševali po poznavanju menedžerskih orodij, po smiselnosti uvajanja posameznega orodja, po zadovoljstvu z uporabo in po tem, katero orodje je najbolj povečalo konkurenčnost oz. uspešnost podjetja. Menedžerska orodja smo izbrali glede na raziskave, ki so jih opravili Bukovec in Markič (2008), Rigby in Bilodeaujeva (2007) ter Ložar (2009). Menedžerska orodja, katerih uporabo smo proučevali, smo izbrali po predhodnih raziskavah: prvih šest (standard ISO 9001, EFQM, model 20 ključev, BSC, six sigma, BPR) po Bukovec-Markičevi raziskavi (2008), naslednja (strateško načrtovanje, primerjalno presojanje, segmentacija odjemalcev, CRM, zunanje izvajanje dejavnosti) po raziskavi Bain company (Rigby in Bilodeau, 2007) in zadnji dve orodji (prebojne inovacije, diferencirana kadrovska strategija) po Ložarjevi (2009). Četrti del vprašalnika se nanaša na vzroke za spodbudo k uporabi oz. načrtovanju uporabe menedžerskih orodij. Od direktorjev se pričakuje, da ocenijo glavne ovire pri vzpostavljanju uporabe menedžerskih orodij in bistvene prednosti, ki so jih z njihovo uvedbo pridobili. Vzroke in spodbude smo povzeli po Piskarjevi in Dolinšku (2006). Populacija in vzorec Vprašalnik so izpolnjevali direktorji IP ali člani uprave. Proučevali smo vseh 164 invalidskih podjetij v Republiki Sloveniji, ki so imela status IP kot gospodarske družbe. Izločili smo 13 tistih, ki jim je prenehal status, so bila v stečaju ali njihovo poslovanje še ni trajalo vsaj tri leta. Poslanih je bilo 151 anketnih vprašalnikov; prejeli smo 95 izpolnjenih vprašalnikov, od tega je bilo šest neveljavnih oz. nepopolnih. V analizo je bilo zajetih 89 IP ali 59 % od poslanih vprašalnikov, kar je zadostna in pričakovana odzivnost pri tovrstni izvedbi raziskave (Flere 2000). Izpolnjene anketne vprašalnike smo obdelali in statistično analizirali s pomočjo aplikacije Statsoft Statisti-ca 7.0. Uporabili smo elementarne statistične metode pri podatkih številčnega tipa, linearno in multivariantno re-gresijsko analizo, analizo variance po enojni klasifikaciji, t-test, F-test, test c2 ter klastersko in faktorsko analizo. 3 Rezultati Odgovore smo prejeli iz vseh statističnih regij v Sloveniji, od podjetij vseh velikosti (mikro, majhna, srednja in velika), vseh dejavnosti in različnih starosti. Največ anketnih vprašalnikov so izpolnili IP, ki dosegajo nad 50 % do 80 % dodane vrednosti na zaposlenega glede na povprečje osnovne klasifikacije dejavnosti podjetja (29 IP oz. 33 %), najmanj pa tisti v razponu do 50 % (12 IP). Primerjava s celotnim vzorcem IP pokaže, da je zastopanost po deležih vrnjenih anketnih vprašalnikov največja (65 %) v razredu z razponom dodane vrednosti na zaposlenega glede na povprečje osnovne klasifikacije dejavnosti podjetja »nad 80 % do 100 %«, razreda »nad 100 %« in »nad 50 % do 80 %« sta zastopana približno 60 %, najmanjši delež (43 %) pa je pri podjetjih, ki so uvrščena v razred »do 50 %«. Vsi IP so bili ustanovljeni med letoma 1956 in 2003, najvišja dokončana stopnja izobrazbe direktorjev je visokošolska (60,7 %), podiplomska pa se pojavlja kar v 14,6 %. Po dejavnosti podjetja jih je 33 % iz storitvene dejavnosti, 21 % iz večinoma storitvene, 12 % iz storitvene in izdelovalne, 8 % iz izdelovalne in 26 % iz večinoma izdelovalne. Po številu zaposlenih je največja skupina IP tistih, ki zaposlujejo med 50 do vključno 250 zaposlenih (61 %), sledijo IP, ki imajo med 10 do vključno 50 zaposlenih (34 %), nato podjetja z več kot 250 zaposlenimi (3 %), najmanj pa je IP, ki zaposlujejo do vključno 10 zaposlenih (2 %). Podjetja najpogosteje (letno) uvajajo spremembe na področju izobraževanja in usposabljanja, na drugih področjih pa uvajajo spremembe na eno do dve leti, najmanj pogosto na področjih postopkov proizvajanja, strojev ali opreme. Pri uvajanju sprememb se podjetja po dejavnostih razlikujejo: storitvena in izdelovalna manj pogosto uvajajo spremembe metod dela kot preostala, storitvena manj pogosto spreminjajo inovacijske, razvojne aktivnosti in uvajajo spremembe na področju proizvajanja, pri strojih ali opremi kot preostala. Pri uvajanju sprememb se podjetja po velikosti razlikujejo: mikro podjetja manj pogosto uvajajo spremembe inovacijskih aktivnosti, pri raziskavah in razvoju in pri izdelkih, storitvah in procesih kot srednja in velika podjetja. Pri uvajanju sprememb se podjetja po starosti razlikujejo: starejša podjetja pogosteje uvajajo spremembe inovacijskih aktivnosti, pri razvoju in pri postopkih proizvajanja, strojih ali opremi kot mlajša. Vzroki za spodbudo k uporabi oz. načrtovanju uporabe menedžerskih orodij Anketiranci so ocenili pomembnost vzrokov za spodbudo k uporabi oz. načrtovanju uporabe menedžerskih orodij. Zanimalo nas je, kateri vzroki so najvplivnejši oz. najmočneje pojasnjujejo, zakaj se menedžerji odločajo za uporabo posameznih orodij. Z uporabo faktorske analize smo poskušali ugotoviti, kateri vzroki so med seboj povezani in kakšen je njihov delež pri odločanju za uvedbo menedžerskih orodij. Faktor 1 določajo vzroki »finančna spodbuda podpornih institucij in državno sofinanciranje«, »upad prodaje« in »napredek tehnologije«; to so trije vzroki, ki imajo največji vpliv na spodbudo k uporabi menedžerskih orodij (25 % celotne variance), a so velikokrat bolj povezani z zunanjimi dejavniki, na katere podjetje ponavadi nima vpliva, vendar ga želi imeti. V okviru najpomembnejšega faktorja je najpomembnejši vzrok za spodbudo »upad prodaje«. Faktor 2 razloži 20 % celotne variance in ga določajo »izpolnjevanje zahtev naravnega okolja«, »želja zaposlenih« in »pogoji dobaviteljev«; to so vzroki, ki pogosto izhajajo iz notranjih in tudi zunanjih zahtev podjetja in na katere podjetje oz. vodstvo lahko vpliva. Faktor 3 povezuje vzroka »konkurenca - znanje in ideje« ter »potrebe/zahteve odjemalcev«; razloži 16 % celotne variance in je faktor konkurenčnosti na trgu. Faktor 4 razloži 13 % celotne variance in povezuje »zahteve lastnikov« in »potrebo po večjem dobičku oz. dvigu dodane vrednosti«, kar pomeni, da je faktor poslovne uspešnosti, ki je na četrtem mestu med vzroki za spodbudo k uporabi menedžerskih orodij v IP. Glavne ovire pri vzpostavljanju uporabe menedžerskih orodij Menedžerji so opredelili ovire, na katere največkrat naletimo, kadar se v IP uvaja uporaba posameznih mene-džerskih orodij. Tudi tu smo skušali z uporabo faktorske analize določiti največje ovire oz. ugotoviti povezavo med njimi za lažjo postavitev modela za njihovo odstranitev. Za analizo ovir pri vzpostavljanju uporabe menedžerskih orodij smo izračunali korelacijsko matriko sedmih spremenljivk, ki prestavljajo odgovore na zastavljeno vprašanje. Izračunali smo indeks MSA v vrednosti 0,612, kar je več od 0,50 in pomeni, da so podatki primerni za faktorsko analizo, kar je potrdil tudi Bartlettov test sferičnosti (p < 0,0001). Faktor 1 določajo ovire »nezanimanje srednjih in nižjih menedžerjev«, »nezanimanje in premajhna podpora zaposlenih« ter »slaba usposobljenost zaposlenih«; to so ovire z največjim vplivom na uvajanje menedžerskih orodij (27 % celotne variance), lahko bi ga imenovali kar faktor neza-nimanja in nesposobnosti. Najpomembnejši oviri v okviru najpomembnejšega faktorja sta »nezanimanje in premajhna podpora zaposlenih« ter »slaba usposobljenost zaposlenih«. Faktor 2 razloži 24 % celotne variance in ga določata dve spremenljivki, »problemi z dobavitelji« in »nezanima-nje odjemalcev«; to sta oviri, ki izhajata iz zunanjih dejavnikov podjetja oz. pogojev nabave in prodaje. Faktor 3 z 21 % celotne variance določata dve spremenljivki, »preobremenjenost menedžmenta s sprotnim delom« in »pomanjkanje virov - finančnih, kadrovskih, infrastruk-turnih«; to sta oviri, ki izhajata iz notranjih problemov podjetja oz. iz pomanjkanja virov in posledično preobremenjenosti vodstva. Gorazd Šoster, Mirko Markič: Uporaba orodij menedžmenta in dodana vrednost v slovenskih invalidskih podjetjih Menedžerska orodja Med menedžerskimi orodji v IP se najpogosteje uvajajo in uporabljajo zunanje izvajanje dejavnosti, strateško načrtovanje in sistem vodenja po standardu ISO 9001, naslednja, manj poznana in uvajana je skupina orodij, ki izboljšuje trženje in odnose z odjemalci (primerjalno presojanje, se-gmentacija odjemalcev in CRM), najmanj pa poznajo orodji six sigma in diferencirana kadrovska strategija (slika 1). Zadovoljstvo z uporabo menedžerskih orodij Največ anketirancev je zadovoljnih s tremi menedžerskimi orodji, z zunanjim izvajanjem dejavnosti, strateškim načrtovanjem in standardom ISO 9001, in sicer s povprečno oceno nad 4; lestvica je imela 5 stopenj (slika 2). Večina ocen zadovoljstva se giblje med 3 in 4, najboljše pa so ocene za orodji diferencirana kadrovska strategija in EFQM, vendar je ti dve orodji ocenilo manj kot 10 % anketirancev. Slika 2: Ocena zadovoljstva z uporabo menedžerskih orodij 60 - 50 40 30 20 10 -4 -3 -2 - 1 cz cz o m m ^ ro iS 8! "O CZ -2 55 £ 00 i £ A- CP > ■ CD O E O. ro cz s CL O ro E C = CM cz o tn ° Si □C CL m cz