1 Introduction In recent decades, the developed world has faced sig­nificant population ageing, primarily due to improved health conditions, hygiene practices, and a better quality of life. This trend is projected to continue, driven by longer life expectancy and declining fertility rates (Eurostat, 2020). Consequently, the upcoming retirement of the large “baby-boom” generation will have critical implications in just over a decade. As a result, concerns regarding the management of public finances and the sustainability of pension systems are justified. The issue of population age­ing is undoubtedly complex, which is why we have decid­ed to focus only on the question of how to ensure that older workers remain actively employed for longer periods. Many European countries are addressing those chal­lenges by raising the retirement age. However, Pirani et al. (2022) view such a solution as an imposition, highlighting its negative consequences for individuals, companies, and society as a whole. Worker protests and trade union dissat­isfaction with retirement age increases have been prevalent (Shah, 2023; Hill, 2018; Heintz, 2018; CBS News, 2010). Moreover, most employers also do not support late retire­ment despite acknowledging the ageing issues (Van Dalen et al., 2010a). Negative stereotypes about older workers persist within companies, influencing hiring practices (Munnell & Wettstein, 2020; Van Dalen & Henkens, 2020; Parry & Smeaton 2018). Consequently, older individuals face difficulties in obtaining employment, resulting in higher long-term unemployment rates compared to other age groups across many EU countries (Eurostat, 2023a). Last but not least, the effects of extending the retirement age have a negative effect on the health of older workers (Barschkett et al., 2022; Pilipiec et al., 2021; Voss et al., 2020; Shai, 2018; De Grip et al., 2012), which implies an additional burden on public finances. The fact is, that while extending the retirement age preserves the pension system from collapsing, the cost savings are counterbalanced by increased healthcare expenditures (Shai, 2018). Considering the potential negative consequences of forcibly extending the retirement age, our focus is on en­couraging older individuals to remain actively engaged in the workforce for a longer period out of their personal desire, rather than being obligated to do so by the system. We see the solution in tackling the problems associated with older workers in the workplace and in the planned treatment of older workers in companies. Indeed, many au­thors (e.g. Rožman et al., 2019; Kim & Kang, 2017; Buck­le, 2015; Anxo et al., 2012; Kooij et al., 2010) argue that appropriate incentives from employers have a beneficial impact on older workers in terms of their well-being, be­longing, commitment, satisfaction, and productivity, and impact on longer labour participation. This topic led us to analyse the measures companies take to treat older workers so that they can stay at work for as long as possible. Companies in Slovenia are imple­menting various measures proposed by the Slovenian Em­ployers’ Association (ZDS, 2010). Since these measures are based on information gathered from various analyses, we assumed that companies systematically conducting employee analyses are more aware of the importance of creating a supportive work environment for older employ­ees and consequently implementing appropriate measures. Our research focused on three key aspects, namely train­ing and education, knowledge transfer and career devel­opment, and health management for older employees. The rationale for each aspect is provided below. The education and training aspect was chosen because of previous find­ings that employers mostly perceive outdated knowledge of modern technologies and their unwillingness to en­gage in further training as the main shortcomings of old­er workers (Conen et al., 2012; Baruch et al., 2014). This highlights the need for employers to adequately motivate older workers for training and education (ZDS, 2010). On the other hand, employers have shown hesitation in including older workers in training programs or adapting training methods to suit them (Schröder et al., 2014; Ng & Feldman, 2012; Fuertes et al., 2013; Ilmarinen, 2012). The consequences of the above are often reflected in the decision of older workers to retire earlier (Hennekam & Herrbach, 2013). The second chosen aspect was knowl­edge transfer and career development. We consider it to be important since older workers take valuable tacit knowl­edge with them when they retire, even though employers should ensure that older workers transfer their knowledge to younger workers (Baruch et al., 2014; Ilmarinen, 2012). Additionally, employers’ focus on the career development of older workers is a significant activity, as it is known that older workers who are provided with opportunities for ca­reer growth tend to postpone their retirement plans (Hen­nekam & Herrbach, 2013). Managing the health of older workers was chosen as the third aspect. It is important be­cause poor health is the most common reason for leaving work and early retirement (Trades Union Congress (TUC), 2021). Employers should therefore pay more attention to activities that have a positive impact on employees’ health, as health is the factor that has the greatest impact on work­ers’ satisfaction and decision to retire later (Marvell & Cox, 2017). On the other hand, employers often criticize the poor health of older workers, which leads to additional costs for companies, e.g. due to absenteeism and reduced productivity (Bogataj et al., 2019). Employers could make improvements by taking appropriate action, such as cre­ating a supportive work environment, promoting lifestyle changes, and raising employee awareness (ZDS, 2010). We based our research on the understanding that the frequency of implementing HR practices influences em­ployee development and the maturity of the company it­self. However, the measures within the three aspects men­tioned above are among those most frequently mentioned in the literature as ways in which employers can influence the decision of older workers to postpone retirement or prolong their working lives. Since employee analyses form the basis of employee management, we investigated how the frequency of analyses affects the frequency of imple­menting measures within these three aspects. In conduct­ing the survey, we limited our focus to large companies in Slovenia. We believe that our research opens up a new perspective and opportunities for companies to reflect on their practices in managing older workers and actively en­gage in the analysis and implementation of measures. The benefits of taking action are not only important for com­panies, but also for individuals and, ultimately, for society as a whole. In the following section of the article, we presented the literature review chapter, which outlines the findings of authors in the field of ageing and managing older work­ers. In the Methods chapter, we provided the basis of our research, justified it, and described the methodology em­ployed. The Results chapter follows, where we presented the significant findings of our study. The Discussion chap­ter focused on the implications of our findings and high­lighted the importance of the research. In the conclusion, we summarized the main results, acknowledged the limita­tions of the study, and provided suggestions and directions for future research. 2 Literature review 2.1 Ageing population Population ageing is undoubtedly the predominant de­mographic phenomenon of this century in most developed countries (Bloom & Luca, 2016). It is primarily driven by declining fertility rates and increasing life expectancy (Dobrescu & Smith, 2016). According to demographic projections, this trend is expected to continue. Eurostat data (2021) stated that the proportion of the Slovenian population aged 65+ was 20.2% in 2020 and will increase to 30.7% by 2050. At the same time, the share of young people aged 14 and under will decrease (from 15.4% to 13.1%). The same will happen to the population aged 15-64, which currently represents the most active work­ing-age population (decrease from 64.6% of the total pop­ulation in 2020 to 55.9% in 2050). Considering that not all individuals in this age group are employed (e.g., young people mostly enter the labour market after the age of 24), it is evident that addressing the issue of population ageing requires a serious approach. The older population is typically defined as individu­als aged 65 and above (European Commission, Eurostat, 2020) or those above retirement age (Lazazzara & Bom­belli, 2012). In Slovenia and most EU countries, the retire­ment age is set at 65. However, various authors differently approach the term “older worker”. Some consider indi­viduals aged 50 and above (e.g., Hilsen & Olsen, 2021; Van Dalen & Henkens, 2020; ZDS, 2010), while others focus on individuals above 55 years old (e.g., Munell & Wettstein, 2020; Voss et al., 2020; Lazazzara & Bombelli, 2011). Some authors even use the term “older workers” to refer to individuals aged 40 or 45 and above (e.g., Ybema et al., 2016; Bayl-Smith & Griffin, 2014; Ng & Feldman, 2012). In our research, we adopted the term “older work­er” for individuals aged 55 and above, which aligns with the definition accepted by the European Council in Lisbon and Stockholm (European Communities, 2003) as well as with Slovenian legislation (ZDR-1, 2013). To better understand the situation, here are some key data on the older population in the labour market in Slove­nia compared to the EU member states’ average. According to Eurostat data (2023b), the low employment rate among the population aged 55 to 64 poses the greatest challenges to employment and the sustainability of the pension sys­tem. While the employment rate in the age group of 15 to 64 years was higher than the EU-27 average in 2021 (SI: 71.4%, EU-27: 68.4%), the situation is reversed for older workers. Slovenia has one of the lowest employment rates among countries in the age group of 55 to 64 years (52.7%), while the EU-27 average stands at 60.5%. The situation is even worse in the age group of 60 to 64 years, with Slovenia’s employment rate being only 30.6%, while the EU-27 average is 46.4%. To maintain the sustainability of pension systems, many developed countries are increasing the retirement age, but this is not necessarily the best solution if it is im­posed. This is suggested by various studies and research. Firstly, the opinion of De Grip et al. (2012) argue that pol­icymakers have overlooked the impact of later retirement on individuals’ well-being and health. In fact, their study showed significant and lasting effects on the health of old­er workers when they were forced to extend their work­ing lives. Furthermore, it should be noted that many older workers leave the labour market before reaching the offi­cial retirement age. Some leave because of demanding or exhausting work, others due to poor health, and some due to family caregiving responsibilities (Pirani et al., 2022; Voss et al., 2020; TUC, 2021). For older workers, particu­larly stressful are low-paid and physically demanding in­dustries, as ageing is associated with decreased physical capacity (Conen et al., 2012; Turek & Perek-Bialas, 2013). If they remain employed, they often produce fewer or low­er-quality goods, leading to significant supply chain delays (Bogataj et al., 2019). Using the case of manufacturing workers in Italy, the authors found that in certain jobs, workers are unable to work until the increased retirement age. In the case of unemployment, they are in an unenvi­able position, as unemployment of older people has been shown to lead to depression and anxiety, lower self-es­teem, impaired well-being, and mental health (Blomqvist et al., 2020; Whitley & Popham, 2017; Voss et al., 2020). In addition, unemployment of older people is more often associated with long-term unemployment, leading to in­voluntary retirement. The increase in the retirement age does not only affect workers in less skilled or physically demanding jobs. It also impacts the health and well-being of highly educat­ed workers due to increased work intensity and a stress­ful environment. Standing (2017), for example, mentions cases of managers who, after the age of 55, consciously choose to change their employment and accept positions below their technical abilities and experience. This deci­sion allowed them to calm their thoughts and focus on their personal lives without experiencing significant stressors. Previously, this was not possible as their synapses were so overloaded that they could not think about anything other than work-related issues. Flynn (2014) has highlighted the poor health conditions of individuals in the age group of 50 to 59 in the United Kingdom, with 44% being inactive due to chronic illness or disability. The author attributes this to the increasing work intensity and higher levels of work-related stress, particularly evident in specific sectors such as healthcare and education. Two more recent studies mention the negative conse­quences of extending the retirement age, in particular the poorer health of older workers. Barschkett et al. (2022) examined the impact of pension reform for women in the Netherlands and provided evidence that raising the re­tirement age has a detrimental effect on health outcomes, particularly in terms of mental health, musculoskeletal disorders, and obesity. Shai (2018), on the other hand, in­vestigated the impact of a new reform extending the retire­ment age among men in Israel from 65 to 67 and found that extended retirement leads to worsening health outcomes among older workers. The study found that prolonged re­tirement resulted in a deterioration of health among old­er workers. Importantly, the study also emphasized that while extending the retirement age contributes to sustain­able pension systems, the savings are offset by increased healthcare expenditures for the affected older workers due to the reform. The imposed policy of raising the retirement age, which has many of the negative consequences mentioned above, can be replaced by older workers voluntarily choosing to stay in work for longer. In fact, the following options are also available to address the sustainability of the pension system (Grah et al., 2019): establishing additional or sup­plementary pension schemes, attracting young immigrant workers, providing education and parallel training of new young workers under the supervision of older workers, investing in collaborative robots and raising productivity. Studies that highlight the negative impact of imposed de­cisions regarding retirement age extension are particular­ly significant. Therefore, our efforts are directed towards voluntary decision-making and individuals’ willingness to remain actively engaged in work for a longer period. The sense of control over the transition to retirement also influ­ences an individual’s happiness (Calvo et al., 2009), which further supports the idea that the retirement transition should not be forced through retirement age extension. Employers play a crucial role in determining whether a worker will retire or continue working when they reach retirement age. That is why the OECD (2019) actively en­courages employers to retain and hire older workers as part of their policies addressing the challenges of an ageing workforce. However, this raises the question of whether employers are truly doing enough to retain and motivate older employees. Indeed, many authors (e.g. Buckle, 2015; Kim & Kang, 2017) suggest that workers are more likely to stay longer in the workforce, even if they are eligible for retirement, only if their employer supports them and takes their needs seriously. 2.2 HRM and older employees There are many definitions of HRM in the literature, but the common thread is that it is a comprehensive ap­proach to the recruitment and development of people. A more recent definition that takes into account modern ap­proaches, strategic perspectives, a partnership, and a sus­tainable view of employee management was proposed by Opatha (2021: 31): “HRM refers to the implementation of specific functions and activities within an organisation to maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of its employ­ees. The primary goals of HRM include satisfying key stakeholders to the best possible extent and making a pos­itive contribution to the natural environment.” According to this definition, as demographic changes occur and the proportion of older workers in the labour force increas­es, it becomes evident that age management is a crucial component of HRM. Indeed, an appropriate work environ­ment, taking care of older workers’ health and well-being, considering the needs of older workers, and promoting age diversity are all consequences of appropriate management of older workers, which results in better performance of work tasks (Rožman et al., 2019). Finally, workers experience HRM practices as a recog­nition of their contribution, which influences their positive attitude towards the organisation as they feel that they have something to give back to the organisation (Kooij et al., 2010). We are talking about the loyalty that older workers have towards the organisation, which is why these work­ers often choose to stay with the company even after they have reached the conditions for retirement. By implement­ing appropriate measures and strategies to manage age and ageing in the workforce at the organisational level, we can significantly contribute to its success and competitiveness. While companies are aware of population ageing and the need for extended work participation of older workers (Van Dalen, 2010a), this awareness alone is far from suffi­cient. In practice, it is often found that older workers face avoidance or bias (Derous & Decoster, 2017). Negative beliefs held by employers about older workers often influ­ence these attitudes, preventing the utilization of the sig­nificant potential of older employees (Turek & Henkens, 2020). Among the negative stereotypes and beliefs held by employers, the most frequently mentioned by authors are inflexibility, lower creativity, less willingness to undertake training and education, poor computer skills, and a number of health problems (Turek & Henkens, 2020; Van Dalen & Henkens, 2020, Parry & Smeaton 2018; Munnell & Wet­tstein, 2020). These employer stereotypes also affect the beliefs of older workers, making them less confident and often leading them to retire as soon as possible or even pre­maturely. Finally, an additional problem of negative stere­otypes of older workers is that they are deeply rooted and difficult to change (Van Dalen et al., 2010b). Therefore, it is of great importance to implement prevention programs to increase knowledge of the ageing process and promote positive attitudes towards older people, with a consequent impact on reducing stereotypical images of older people (Donizzetti, 2019). On the positive side, the labour shortage will encour­age employers to improve their treatment of older workers, as they will be forced to harness their potential and consider measures that are important to older employees (Turek & Henkens, 2020). This means they will need to monitor fac­tors that motivate and bring satisfaction to older workers. Marvell & Cox (2017) found that older workers value the same factors at work as other age groups, with a particular emphasis on health, which has the greatest impact on their satisfaction, job quality, and decisions regarding extended work participation. The opportunity for additional training and education is also an important factor, as older workers are well aware of rapid technological advancements and the need for new skills. The significance of job satisfaction among older workers is further evident in the fact that, on average, the likelihood of older workers desiring early re­tirement decreases by 14.2 percentage points among those who are satisfied with their job (Anxo et al., 2012: 622). This means that HR management needs to take a proac­tive and timely approach to the issue of ageing and older workers, otherwise, there is a high risk that older workers will leave the labour market because working conditions and health conditions will make them uncompetitive with younger generations. The report addressing the key question of how to sup­port older workers in extending their working lives (TUC, 2021) highlights several important measures. These in­clude providing support for the training and education of older workers, focusing on their development and career advancement, and raising awareness about the importance of a healthy lifestyle. Therefore, in our study, we specifi­cally focused on measures related to three aspects imple­mented by companies when dealing with older workers: education and training, knowledge transfer and career de­velopment, and initiatives related to managing the health of older workers. 2.2.1 Education and training of older workers In the past, people used to follow a linear life cycle where education, work, and retirement were separate stag­es. However, rapid changes in society have introduced a new pattern where education, work, and leisure activities are spread throughout our lives (Ilmarinen, 2006). This means that continuous education and training have be­come crucial for the success of businesses. It is especially important to involve older workers in the process of edu­cation and training to ensure their ongoing development (Hilsen & Olsen, 2021; Marvell & Cox, 2017). Ageing has a clear impact on the decline of physical abilities as well as on certain cognitive abilities of indi­viduals (Bogataj et al., 2019; Ilmarinen, 2012). As we age, fluid cognitive abilities associated with information pro­cessing, such as mental skills, problem-solving, and the speed of making connections, tend to decline. On the other hand, crystallized cognitive abilities tend to increase with age. These are skills and experiences that have been accu­mulated over years of practice and repetition. There is of­ten a compensatory effect where declines in fluid cognitive abilities are offset by relying more on crystallized abilities (Conen et al., 2012), as well as psychomotor abilities (Il­marinen, 2012). With the advancements in technology and robotics, there are valid expectations for extended working lives as they successfully replace hazardous and physically de­manding tasks. Modern technology effectively replaces jobs that require physical labor or motor skills and has a positive impact on workers’ productivity (Bogataj et al., 2019; Baruch et al., 2014). However, it also demands new skills, rapid adaptation to changing situations, and a will­ingness to embrace novelties which are often considered weaknesses of older workers by employers (Parry & Sme­aton, 2018; Van Dalen & Henkens, 2020). Therefore, pro­viding continuous education and training is a significant challenge for employers to ensure that older workers can quickly and successfully acquire the skills needed to work with new technology. It is particularly important to tailor the training and education methods to the needs of older workers, as they typically require more time to learn new innovations compared to younger workers (Bogataj et al., 2019). Inadequate training methods often result in older workers being unwilling to learn, which can be attributed to feelings of insecurity and fear of failure (ZDS, 2010). Hence, it is necessary to motivate older workers appropri­ately, especially when it comes to training with new tech­nology, and dispel the notion that they will be unsuccess­ful. Considering the recommendations for older workers to continue working longer (TUC, 2021) and the benefits of voluntarily choosing later retirement (Voss et al., 2020; Shai, 2018; Anxo et al., 2012), an important finding emerg­es: older workers who receive adequate training and edu­cation from their employers are more inclined to extend their working lives (Hennekam & Herrbach, 2013). This underscores the significance of providing tailored training and support for older workers, which can ultimately influ­ence their decision to prolong their careers. 2.2.2 Knowledge transfer and career development for older workers In favor of older workers, it is important to recognize that they represent an authentic source of capital and wis­dom (Vasconcelos, 2018), have invaluable experience, excellent interpersonal skills, commitment, and reliability (Parry & Smeaton, 2018; Van Dalen & Henkens, 2020). Therefore, employers should ensure that knowledge is transferred to younger workers in a timely manner (Baruch et al., 2014; Grah et al., 2019). Special attention should be given to talented older workers to preserve their extensive knowledge and experience, as this is essential for main­taining competitiveness (Pinto et al., 2015). An example of good practice is mentoring or instructing younger workers, especially those who will eventually replace older employ­ees (Hilsen & Olsen, 2021; Flyn, 2014). On the other hand, younger workers bring new knowledge in IT and modern work methods, making mixed-age teams an ideal oppor­tunity for knowledge exchange (Grah et al., 2019; Flyn, 2014). In addition to the necessary knowledge, experience, and skills in the workplace, it is important to consider oth­er negative factors that further challenge older workers. Older workers often experience reduced physical strength (Bogataj et al., 2019; Conen et al., 2012) and lower re­silience in stressful situations (Buckle, 2015). Career de­velopment can successfully address these challenges by reducing physical burdens and stress, which positively impacts their productivity (Baruch et al., 2014). To en­sure that older workers remain active in the workforce for longer, job redistribution should also be utilized as a preventive measure to maintain their health and job sat­isfaction (ZDS, 2010). Companies that are aware of this provide better working conditions and, through appropri­ate career development for older workers, influence them to choose to retire later (Hennekam & Herrbach, 2013). 2.2.3 Older workers and the importance of health Companies are increasingly dependent on the working capacity of older workers, as their proportion in the work­force continues to grow year by year (Varianou-Mikel­lidou et al., 2018). It is a fact that as people age, their over­all health deteriorates (Turek & Perek-Bialas, 2013), and that long-term health problems and chronic diseases are on the rise (Ilmarinen, 2012). As the good health of employ­ees is crucial for the success and competitiveness of any business (Craftword et al., 2017), it is not surprising that companies are adopting age-related employee treatment practices (Previtali et al., 2022). The purpose of companies implementing those practices is to create an age-friendly environment, support healthy ageing at work, and contrib­ute to the extended work participation of older workers (Boehm et al., 2021). Indeed, older people are a group that requires special attention in terms of occupational safety and health (Varianou-Mikellidou et al., 2018), as their poor health often leads to early retirement (Pirani et al., 2022; Flyn, 2014). It is in the interest of society as a whole and sustainable development that older workers remain in em­ployment for as long as possible (Neupane et al., 2023). The often-poor health condition of employees coin­cides with unfavorable working conditions and accidents at work. Ilmarinen (2012) mentions that as many as 30% of workers between the ages of 50 and 60 require adjust­ments due to health issues, which helps prevent early re­tirement and work disability. Therefore, it is important to assess the risks associated with each job position and implement appropriate measures to eliminate or prevent negative impacts that lead to ill health (ZDS, 2010). In­vestments in ergonomics and collaborative robots can for example contribute to reducing fatigue and cognitive stress among older workers (Bogataj et al., 2019). Increasing work intensity and stressful situations can be successfully addressed through flexible working hours, shorter working hours, and even redeployment (Baruch et al., 2014; Stand­ing, 2017), or by creating a work environment in which older workers feel comfortable (Rožman et al., 2019). Em­ployers play a crucial role in promoting positive visions of ageing and implementing programs that lead to positive self-perception of ageing (Donizzetti, 2019). In fact, stud­ies have shown that positive self-perception of ageing is associated with a higher level of well-being, better health, and longevity, while negative self-perception of ageing is linked to reduced self-efficacy, depression, and poorer physical health. Therefore, the main purpose of raising awareness among employees regarding health is to change their attitude toward health. Employers have a key role to play in promoting healthy and active ageing, influencing employees to become aware of the negative consequences of an unhealthy lifestyle (Rožman et al., 2019). Besides strong employer’s support, the study by Previtali et al. (2022) also highlighted the importance of organisational health climate and supervisor support for the successful work of older workers. The authors found that organisa­tional support in health management and leadership care for employee well-being contribute to increased effec­tiveness among older workers. Therefore, they believe that policies and incentives promoting health promotion should be encouraged. Raising awareness about health in the workplace, promoting healthy lifestyles, and creating a supportive work environment are therefore important fac­tors in ensuring appropriate working conditions and thus influencing older workers to work longer (Neupane et al., 2023). 3 Methodology 3.1 Research background and justification of the research hypotheses The rationale for our research is that an ageing popula­tion requires action, otherwise, living standards cannot be maintained and existing economic and social systems be­come unsustainable. A review of the literature on popula­tion ageing and the treatment of older workers (e.g., Pirani et al., 2022; Voss et al., 2020; Shai, 2018) has shown that simply extending the retirement age is not always the right solution, especially if it is imposed. Given the complexity of the ageing issue, we have focused our research on the actions of employers, who, according to Henkens (2021), serve as a crucial link between state legislation and work­ers. Therefore, we have been considering how employers can contribute to the desire of older workers to continue working. Based on a review of relevant literature in Chap­ter 2 (e.g., ZDS, 2010; Boehm et al., 2021; TUC, 2021; Neupane et al., 2023; Hennekam & Herrbach, 2013), we have found that the decision of older workers to retire later is influenced primarily by HRM measures, which are: • The employer provides opportunities for contin­uous training, education, and skill development. • The employer expresses concern for career devel­opment and ensures the transfer of knowledge to younger generations. • The employer demonstrates a commitment to health and provides appropriate health-oriented working conditions. Such a work environment is more stimulating for older workers and allows them to make the most of their poten­tial, which is, of course, the desire of every employer. The HRM measures identified in the literature as im­portant in encouraging older workers to work longer were also considered in our study. We wanted to know whether companies that have a higher level of HRM maturity and are more engaged with their employees, in general, are also more likely to implement measures aimed at educa­tion and training, skills transfer and career development, and health management of older workers. We therefore started from the premise that companies that recognise the importance of human resource manage­ment and strive for a higher level of HRM maturity work systematically and proactively towards providing a stim­ulating environment for all employees, with particular at­tention to vulnerable groups, including older workers. In this way, they contribute to better working conditions for older workers and, indirectly, help to make them more fit for longer working lives. It is a fact that analyses of employees serve as the foun­dation for achieving a higher level of HRM maturity in companies (Shams-Zare et al., 2018). Through employee analyses, companies obtain all the necessary information for further action. The literature shows that the frequency of implementing HR practices influences employee devel­opment and contributes to HRM maturity (Chasovschi, 2012; Shams-Zare et al., 2018), with mature HRM com­panies conducting regular and systematic analyses of their employees. By conducting competency and qualification analyses, companies can identify development solutions in a timely manner (Hilsen & Olsen, 2021), such as how to involve older workers in the work process in the coming years, what additional knowledge they will need, how to foster their career development, and what changes to in­troduce regarding existing job classifications, among other things. The guiding principle in formulating the research question was that employers who generally have a greater awareness of the importance of HR management and sys­tematically conduct employee analyses are more aware of the importance of providing a stimulating environment for older workers and accordingly implementing appropriate measures. Systematic analyses of the health structure of the em­ployees also play a significant role in effective human re­sources management, especially for older workers. The results of such analyses provide companies with a basis for employee health management. Information such as health absenteeism and accidents at work provides a start­ing point for companies to contribute to better employee health (ZDS, 2010). Such companies are also aware that older workers require certain special treatments and work­ing conditions and, consequently, implement appropriate measures for older workers. Based on all the above, we therefore assume that the more mature a company is in HRM, the more frequently it conducts competency analyses and health analyses of its employees, as well as the more frequently it implements measures aimed at improving the well-being of older workers, such as training and education, knowledge trans­fer, career development of employees and health manage­ment. In order to confirm or refute our prediction in the case of large companies in Slovenia, we have formulated the following statistical hypotheses, which we intend to test empirically in our research: H1: Companies that more frequently conduct com­prehensive analyses of their employees’ competencies and qualifications are also more likely to implement measures geared toward the education and training of older work­ers. • H1a: There is a statistically significant positive correlation between the frequency of conducting analyses of employees’ competencies and qualifi­cations and the overall average frequency of im­plementing measures geared toward the education and training of older workers. • H1b: There is a statistically significant positive correlation between the frequency of conducting analyses of employees’ competencies and qualifi­cations and the frequency of implementing meas­ures geared toward the education and training of older workers (at the level of a particular meas­ure). H2: Companies that more frequently conduct compre­hensive analyses of their employees’ competencies and qualifications are also more likely to implement measures geared toward the knowledge transfer and professional development of older workers. • H2a: There is a statistically significant positive correlation between the frequency of conducting analyses of employees’ competencies and qualifi­cations in companies and the overall average fre­quency of implementing measures geared toward the knowledge transfer and career development of older workers. • H2b: There is a statistically significant positive correlation between the frequency of conducting analyses of employees’ competencies and qualifi­cations and the frequency of implementing meas­ures geared toward the knowledge transfer and career development of older workers (at the level of a particular measure). H3: Companies that more frequently conduct compre­hensive analyses of their employees’ health structure are also more likely to implement measures geared toward caring for the health of older workers. • H3a: There is a statistically significant positive correlation between the frequency of conducting analyses of the employees’ health structure and the overall average frequency of implementing measures geared toward caring for the health of older workers. • H3b: There is a statistically significant positive correlation between the frequency of conducting analyses of the employees’ health structure and the frequency of implementing measures geared toward caring for the health of older workers (at the level of a particular measure). A review of a wide range of literature has shown the importance of both employee analyses and measures in the management of older workers, but we have not seen any research examining whether there is a statistically signifi­cant relationship between these activities. Thus, our study is unique and offers an opportunity to fill a gap in the sci­entific and professional environment in the field of ageing and employers’ actions in the context of dealing with older workers. 3.2 Research population and data collection In this study, we will use a part of the data collected during a comparative analysis of the implementation of measures geared toward managing older workers in large companies (Vidmar et al., 2021). The study focused on the population of Slovenian companies classified as large companies according to Article 55 of the Companies Act (ZGD-1-UPB3, 2009) and have at least 100 employees. At the time of data collection, according to the Agency of the Republic of Slovenia for Public Legal Records and Relat­ed Services (AJPES), the chosen population consisted of 269 companies. Data collection was performed from April 17, 2020, to July 6, 2020, using a purpose-developed sur­vey questionnaire and the online survey tool 1ka (https://www.1ka.si/). Through companies’ management or their HR departments, all 269 companies from the research pop­ulation were invited to participate in the survey. 3.3 Statistical methods The validity of our predictions will be tested by apply­ing the correlation analysis. The relationship among the variables under consideration will be analysed using Pear­son’s correlation coefficient on sample data. The absolute value of this coefficient indicates the strength of the corre­lation, while its sign indicates the direction of the correla­tion. For testing H1a, H1b, H2a, H2b, H3a, and H3b, we will conduct a one-tailed test of linear correlation. Hypotheses H1a, H2a, and H3a will be confirmed if the corresponding p-value is significant at least at the 10% level. For hypotheses H1b, H2b, and H3c, multiple p-val­ues will need to be examined (for each particular measure). These hypotheses will be confirmed if the majority (more than 50%) of the corresponding p-values are significant at least at the 10% level. The main hypotheses H1, H2, and H3 will be confirmed if both sub-hypotheses are con­firmed. 4 Results 4.1 Sample analysis 73 out of a total of 269 companies responded to the invitation to participate in the survey, representing a re­sponse rate of 27.14%. 13 questionnaires were only par­tially completed and were consequently excluded from further analysis. We therefore have a sample of 60 compa­nies, which corresponds to 22.3% of the total population. The smallest company had 107 employees, while the largest company had 4,872 employees. Most of the compa­nies in the sample (33.33%) fell into the range of 200-400 employees, while 25% of the companies had 1,000 or more employees. 18.33% of the companies had between 400 and 600 employees, while 13.33% had 600-800 employees. Companies with up to 200 employees accounted for the smallest number (10%). The average number of employ­ees was 758.57 with a standard deviation of 799.58. The majority of companies in the sample (56.67%) have domestic capital, while the proportion of companies with foreign or mixed capital are the same (21.67%). 4.2 Hypothesis testing The selected data were processed using IBM SPSS Statistics (https://www.ibm.com/se-sv/products/spss-sta­tistics), version 28.0. The results of the analyses are pre­sented below. 4.2.1 The correlation between analyses of employees’ competencies and qualifications and the implementation of education and training measures for older workers In order to test H1a and H1b (and consequently H1) we extracted from an existing database the data on conducting analyses of employees’ competencies and qualifications and implementation of measures geared toward education and training of older workers. All the activities studied were rated on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 means “nev­er” and 5 means “always”. The descriptive statistics for the selected variables are shown in Table 1. For testing the H1a, a correlation analysis was carried out between the variables “Frequency of conducting anal­yses of employees’ competencies and qualifications in the company.” and “The overall average frequency of imple­menting measures for the education and training of older workers.”. The results are shown in Table 2. From Table 2, it can be seen that the Pearson correla­tion coefficient is 0.577, which means that there is a signif­icant positive correlation between the two variables in the sample data. This means that among the companies that participated in the survey, the more frequently the compa­ny conducts analyses of the competencies and qualifica­tions of its employees, the higher the average frequency of implementing measures geared toward the education and training of older workers. The decision to accept/reject H1a can be made on the basis of the result of a one-sided linear correlation test. It can be seen that the p-value of the test (Sig. 1-tailed) is less than 0.001, which means that the H1a hypothesis can be accepted at 1% significance level. As part of the H1b analysis, we are interested in wheth­er the frequency of analyses of employees’ competencies and qualifications in a company is related to the frequency of the implementation of specific measures geared toward the education and training of older workers (see Table 1). The results of the correlation analysis are summarised in Table 3. The results in Table 3 show that all sample values of the Pearson correlation coefficient are positive, ranging from 0.318 to 0.486. For the companies that participated in the survey, it can therefore be concluded that there is a moderate positive linear correlation between the varia­bles studied. The more frequently a company analyses the employees’ competencies and qualifications, the more fre­quently it carries out specific measures to educate and train older workers. The decision to accept/reject H1b is based on the re­sult of a one-sided linear correlation test. It can be seen that the p-values of the test (Sig. 1-tailed) are statistically significant and less than 0.01 for all measures. Therefore, the hypothesis H1b can be fully accepted at 1% of signif­icance level. Given that we have confirmed both hypothesis H1a and hypothesis H1b, we can also confirm the main hypoth­esis H1. 4.2.2 The correlation between analyses of employees’ competencies and qualifications and the implementation of measures for knowledge transfer and career development of older workers In order to test H2a and H2b (and consequently H2) we extracted from an existing database the data on conducting analyses of employees’ competencies and qualifications and implementation of measures geared toward the knowl­edge transfer and career development of older workers. All the activities studied were rated on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 means “never” and 5 means “always”. The descriptive statistics for the selected variables are shown in Table 4. For testing the H2a, a correlation analysis was car­ried out between the variables “Frequency of conducting analyses of employees’ competencies and qualifications in the company.” and “The overall average frequency of implementing measures for knowledge transfer, and career development of older workers.”. The results are shown in Table 5. Table 5 shows that the sample Pearson correlation co­efficient is 0.583, which means that there is a significant positive correlation between the two variables. This means that for the companies that participated in the survey, the more often the company carries out competency and quali­fication analyses of its employees, the higher is the average frequency of implementing measures in the field of skills transfer and career development of older workers. The decision to accept/reject H2a can be made on the basis of the result of a one-sided linear correlation test. It can be seen that the p-value of the test (Sig. 1-tailed) is less than 0.001, which means that the H2a hypothesis can be accepted at a significance level of 1%. In an analysis of H2b, we are interested in whether the frequency of analyses of employees’ competencies and qualifications is correlated with the frequency of the implementation of specific measures geared toward the knowledge transfer, and career development of older workers (see Table 4). The results of the correlation analy­sis are summarised in Table 6. From the results in Table 6, we can see that all the sam­ple values of the Pearson correlation coefficient are posi­tive and vary between 0.359 and 0.525. This means that for the companies that participated in the survey, we can conclude that there is a positive linear correlation between the variables studied. The more often a company analyses employees’ competencies and qualifications, the more of­ten it takes measures to transfer knowledge, and skills and develop the careers of older workers. The decision to accept/reject H2b is based on the result of a one-sided linear correlation test. It can be seen that the corresponding p-values (Sig. 1-tailed) are statistically significant and less than 0.01 for all measures. Given that we have confirmed both hypothesis H2a and hypothesis H2b, we can also confirm the main hypoth­esis H2. 4.2.3 The correlation between the employees’ health structure analyses and the implementation of measures to manage the health of older workers In order to test H3a and H3b (and consequently H3) we extracted from an existing database the data on conducting analyses of employees’ health structure and implementa­tion of measures geared toward managing the health of older workers. All the activities studied were rated on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 means “never” and 5 means “always”. The descriptive statistics for the selected varia­bles are shown in Table 7. In order to test H3a, a correlation analysis was carried out between the variables “Frequency of conducting anal­yses of the health structure of company employees.” and “ The overall average frequency of implementing measures for managing the health of older workers.”. The results of the analysis are shown in Table 8. Table 8 shows that the sample value of Pearson corre­lation coefficient is 0.351, indicating a positive linear cor­relation between the two variables. This means that for the companies participating in the survey, the more often the company carries out analyses of the health structure of its employees, the higher is the average frequency of imple­menting measures to manage the health of older workers. The decision to accept/reject H3a can be made on the basis of the result of a one-sided linear correlation test. It can be seen that the p-value of the test (Sig. 1-tailed) is 0.003<0.01, which means that hypothesis H3a can be accepted at 1% significance level. As part of the H3b analysis, we want to discover whether the frequency of employees’ health structure is correlated with the frequency of the implementation of specific measures to manage the health of older workers (see Table 7). The results of the correlation analysis are summarised in Table 9. The results in Table 9 show that the sample values of Pearson correlation coefficient are mostly positive (the only exception is the measure “Providing additional health insurance coverage.”. This means that for the companies surveyed, there is a positive linear correlation between the frequency of health structure analyses of their employees and the frequency of implementation of specific measures to manage the health of older workers. The strength of this relationship is measured by the absolute value of the coef­ficient, which varies between 0.14 and 0.344. The decision to accept/reject H3b is based on the result of a one-sided linear association test. It can be seen that the corresponding p-values of the test (Sig. 1-tailed) for most of the measures (11 out of a total of 13 measures) are statistically significant at least at the 10% significance level. In four cases, the correlation can be confirmed at the 5% level of test significance, and in three cases even at the 1% significance level. The only exceptions are the meas­ures “Providing additional health insurance coverage.” and “Offering healthy food options. “, where the obtained p-values are not statistically significant. On the basis of all the above, and in line with the criteria presented in section 3.3, H3b can also be supported. Given that we have confirmed both hypothesis H3a and hypothesis H3b, we can also confirm the main hypoth­esis H3. 5 Discussion The main focus of our research was to explore how employers can contribute to prolonging the work par­ticipation of older employees. After reviewing relevant literature, we narrowed our study to examine measures implemented by employers in the areas of education and training, knowledge transfer and career development, and health management, and how these measures are connect­ed to conducting employee analyses within the company. We conducted our study using a sample of large companies in Slovenia. Our findings revealed that the participating employ­ers in the study conducted competency and qualification analyses of their employees relatively frequently (average rating of 3.28 on a 5-point scale), as well as analyses of the company’s health structure (average rating of 3.29 on a 5-point scale). Similarly, they also conducted analyses of the company’s health structure, with an average rating of 3.29 on a 5-point scale. By conducting these analyses on a rather frequent basis, companies obtained valuable insights about their employees, enabling them to identify the specific needs of older workers and take appropriate actions in a timely manner. This approach helps employers avoid falling into the trap of stereotyping older workers, a common issue highlighted in previous research (Van Dalen & Henkens, 2020; Parry & Smeaton, 2018). Furthermore, this proactive approach prevents employees from internal­izing age-related stereotypes, such as doubts about their learning abilities or willingness to engage in personal de­velopment (Jeske & Stamov Roßnagel, 2015). Therefore, measures taken to manage older workers based on frequent employee analyses are more realistic, and older workers are more accepting of these measures and more willing to cooperate. Several studies (Boehm et al., 2021; Neupane et al., 2023; Rožman et al., 2019) also find a positive impact of implementing measures to manage older workers on employees and organisational performance. Consequently, this results in a greater willingness among older workers to engage in extended work participation, which was our fundamental guiding principle in this article. The first hypothesis: “Companies that more frequent­ly conduct comprehensive analyses of their employees’ competencies and qualifications are also more likely to implement measures geared toward the education and training of older workers.” has been confirmed. Therefore, we can conclude that companies that conduct more fre­quent employee analyses are more responsive, leading to a higher implementation of measures. Testing at the level of individual measures also indicates that more frequent analyses of employee competencies and qualifications result in a higher implementation of specific measures in the field of education and training for older workers, as considered in our research. The strongest correlation was confirmed for the measures “Implementation of programs within the context of lifelong learning” and “Implementa­tion of various on-the-job training methods during work.” These measures are identified by various authors as cru­cial in managing older workers. For example, Ilmarinen (2012) emphasizes the important role of lifelong education and training throughout all stages of a person’s life, which leads to increased productivity, improved quality of life, and higher employability for older workers. Lazazzara & Bombelli (2011) regard lifelong learning as a key strategy for employing older workers, which is reflected in lower unemployment rates among older individuals with high­er education. Additionally, knowledge quickly becomes outdated, especially in relation to information technology, making continuous education and training crucial for older workers to keep up with advancements. We believe that companies conducting more frequent analyses of employ­ee competencies and qualifications generally demonstrate greater concern for their employees, allowing older work­ers to acquire and upgrade the necessary skills for per­forming required tasks. Fuertes et al. (2013) mention that the problem with education and training for older workers often arises due to inappropriate methods or approaches offered, which should be tailored to older individuals; oth­erwise, older workers may avoid education and training due to fear of failure compared to younger individuals. Our research has shown that this awareness is lacking in the surveyed companies, as the measure “Implementation of training and education programs specifically tailored to older workers” is among the less frequently implemented measures (average rating of 2.83 on a 5-point scale). By providing tailored approaches, we increase the willingness of older workers to engage in education and training (Vas­concelos, 2018), thus influencing a higher implementation of educational initiatives. In conclusion, companies con­ducting more frequent analyses of employee competencies and qualifications are more likely to take action in the di­rection of education and training for older workers, allow­ing older individuals to continuously refresh their knowl­edge and prevent it from becoming outdated. Considering the numerous findings in the literature, we can expect that this leads to increased productivity and subsequent satis­faction among older workers, influencing their decision to retire later. We have also confirmed the second hypothesis: “ Com­panies that more frequently conduct comprehensive anal­yses of their employees’ competencies and qualifications are also more likely to implement measures geared toward the education and training of older workers.”. More fre­quent analyses of employees enable timely action to pre­vent the loss of knowledge and valuable experiences held by older workers. The strongest correlation was observed in measures such as “Utilizing various methods for knowl­edge transfer,” “Forming mixed work teams (a collabora­tion between older and younger employees; intergenera­tional cooperation),” and “Providing career development opportunities”. Many authors recognize these measures as crucial for preserving knowledge and influencing the willingness of older workers to work longer. Knowledge exchange can occur through mentoring schemes, sponsor­ships, or on-the-job training (Hilsen & Olsen, 2021). It is important for companies not to overlook the career goals of older workers. Knowledge exchange and intergenera­tional cooperation also lead to improved work relation­ships and satisfaction among all generations. Fasbender & Gerpott (2022) found that younger workers feel proud to share knowledge with older workers, while the latter sat­isfy their need for leadership and shaping the next genera­tion through knowledge transfer. This increases their read­iness for work and, consequently, leads to later retirement. We agree with Hilsen & Olsen (2021) that the value of age diversity lies in complementarity, as older workers possess a range of professional knowledge and experience, while younger workers bring new skills. In conclusion, compa­nies that conduct more frequent competency and qualifi­cation analyses of their employees are more likely to take timely measures for knowledge transfer and promote the career development of older workers. Based on numerous findings in the literature, this ultimately leads to extended work engagement of older employees. According to the third hypothesis, we have confirmed that the frequency of conducting analyses of employees’ health structure in a company is linked to the frequency of implementing measures for managing the health of older workers. The health of older workers is undoubtedly im­portant for both employees and employers. Older workers even consider health as the most important factor in stay­ing employed for a longer period (Marvell & Cox, 2017). For an employer, taking care of employees’ health is cru­cial to fully utilize their potential; otherwise, they may face absenteeism and higher costs. Although physical functions decline the most with age (Turek & Perek-Bialas, 2013), it is important to consider that modern technologies enable employees to work at levels below their maximum capa­bilities. Modern technology and AI successfully compen­sate for certain cognitive abilities as well. Employers can, therefore, influence and even improve the overall health and abilities of older workers through appropriate meas­ures, thereby increasing their readiness to retire later. The strongest correlation was observed for measures such as “Implementing programs to achieve work-life balance,” “Implementing programs and tools for managing stress in older workers and well-being programs,” and “Incor­porating health promotion into company communication.” The latter measures are frequently mentioned by authors in relation to employee health (e.g., Crawford et al., 2017; Rožman et al., 2019; Buckle, 2015). Implementing pro­grams to achieve work-life balance is particularly impor­tant for older workers because many of them have addi­tional responsibilities in their private lives, such as caring for grandchildren and elderly parents, which can lead to additional work-related exhaustion and worsen the health of older workers (Rožman et al., 2019). Special attention should also be given to measures for managing stress, as it is increasingly prevalent and negatively affects oth­er health conditions in older individuals (Buckle, 2015). This is also related to incorporating health promotion into company communication, which is essential for promot­ing healthy lifestyle habits and creating a supportive work environment, thus influencing the later retirement of older workers. Non-significant results were obtained for meas­ures such as “Paying for additional health insurance” and “Providing healthy food options.” Therefore, in the case of large Slovenian companies, we cannot claim that the fre­quency of implementing these measures is associated with the frequency of conducting analyses of the company’s health structure. In conclusion, regarding the implementa­tion of measures for managing the health of older workers, we can summarize the opinion of Ilmarinen (2012), who said that investing in health is an investment for the entire lifespan, highlighting the necessity of employer actions to have healthy and satisfied older workers who can remain actively employed for longer. 6 Conclusion The future of the economy and society depends on the appropriate approach to population ageing. This complex process can be viewed from the perspective of the state, employers, and individuals. In this article, we focused on how employers can contribute to addressing longer labour participation of older workers. It is a fact that demograph­ic projections raise questions about the sustainability of pension systems. Many countries opt for the quickest and easiest solution, which is changing legislation to enforce later retirement. However, such imposed decisions have negative effects on individuals, employers, and society as a whole. Therefore, we chose a different approach. We explored how employers can indirectly influence older workers to choose longer work participation because they genuinely desire it, not just for economic reasons but also because work brings them happiness and fulfillment of their life purpose. To achieve this, we analysed the measures that companies implement in dealing with older workers and focused on education and training, knowledge transfer and career development, and health management. A review of the literature revealed that stereotypes about older workers often hinder employers in their actions related to older employees, including their employment and retention in the company. Companies can success­fully overcome these stereotypes by obtaining real infor­mation about older workers through employee analyses, considering their competencies, qualifications, and health structure. We found a gap in the literature regarding the correlation between the frequency of conducting employee analyses and the frequency of implementing measures for dealing with older workers. The most significant finding of our research is the confirmation that companies that con­duct employee analyses more frequently also implement measures for dealing with older workers more frequently, including education and training, knowledge transfer and career development, and health management. According to the literature, this means that employers recognize key personnel, ensure knowledge updates, prevent the loss of tacit knowledge, and care for employees’ health, thereby positively influencing the productivity of older workers. These measures also have positive effects on older workers, who, due to education and training measures, become more confident and efficient. Through knowledge transfer and career development measures, they fulfill their purpose, which is reflected in their longer work par­ticipation. Implementing health management measures is also crucial for older workers as it improves well-being, increases their commitment to the company, and prevents poor health, which often leads to premature retirement. To maximize the effectiveness of these measures and in­fluence productivity, we recommend that companies con­duct employee analyses more frequently, as this leads to the more frequent implementation of measures for dealing with older workers. We are confident that the positive as­pects will also be reflected in the decision-making of older workers regarding later retirement. Thus, older workers will voluntarily embrace their social responsibility in the context of population ageing, alongside employers. We believe that our contribution sheds additional light on the issue of population ageing and demonstrates the importance of conducting employee analyses, which is directly related to the implementation of measures for dealing with older workers. One limitation of our research is that only companies from Slovenia participated, so the results reflect a “national attitude” towards managing older workers in the workplace. Additionally, when evaluating the implementation of measures targeted at older workers, we considered only the employers’ perspective and did not include the viewpoint of older workers, who may have a different perception of how genuinely concerned employ­ers are about their well-being. Furthermore, we did not consider the diversity of working conditions in different companies, which could have influenced different results. Future research opportunities lie in examining the implementation of measures for dealing with older work­ers in the coming years. This would allow us to deter­mine whether the situation in companies is improving and whether employers are becoming more aware of the importance of addressing ageing issues. It would also be interesting to survey older workers in companies, compar­ing their assessment of the implementation of measures and their satisfaction with the measures implemented by companies in employee management. Additionally, the re­search could be expanded to include other economic enti­ties. We focused solely on large companies with more than 100 employees. However, since the issue of ageing affects all types of companies, it would be meaningful to include small and medium-sized enterprises in the research and compare whether the strategy for dealing with older work­ers differs based on the company’s size or economic ac­tivity. Literature DOI: 10.2478/orga-2023-0013 Employers’ Efforts to Encourage Older Workers to Retire Later - A Case Study of Large Companies in Slovenia Vesna NOVAK, Anja VIDMAR, Janja JEREBIC, Alenka BREZAVŠCEK University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Kranj, Slovenia, vesna.novak@um.si, anja.vidmar66@gmail.com, janja.jerebic@um.si, alenka.brezavscek@um.si Background and Purpose: Most developed societies are facing the challenge of an ageing population, which pos­es several issues, including low labour force participation and financial pressures on the sustainability of the pension system. Countries typically address this situation by raising the retirement age, which often results in dissatisfaction among workers as such decisions are perceived as imposed. Therefore, our work’s main purpose was to research the analysis of implementing measures for managing older workers in companies, which would indirectly influence workers’ decisions to voluntarily choose longer work participation. Design/Methodology/Approach: We designed our study on the assumption that companies that more frequently conduct various analyses of their employees also pay greater attention to measures for managing older workers. In doing so, we focused on the measures that the literature identifies as important for keeping older workers employed for longer. The data source was a study from 2020, which sampled large companies in Slovenia with more than 100 employees. We posed the questions to the person responsible for human resource management in the company. The initial question was whether conducting employee analyses is associated with the implementation of measures focused on education and training, skills transfer, and career development as well as managing the health of older workers. We formulated three main hypotheses, which we confirmed using linear correlation analysis. Results: We found that companies that conduct more frequent analyses of employees’ qualifications and compe­tencies, on average, also more frequently implement measures related to the area of education and training of older workers and to the area of knowledge transfer and career development of older workers. We confirmed statistically significant correlations in general as well as at the level of particular measures. Furthermore, we found that compa­nies that more frequently conduct analyses of the health structure of employees, on average, also more frequently implement measures in the field of managing the health of older workers. We concluded that companies that conduct employee analyses more frequently demonstrate a higher level of commitment to implementing measures for man­aging older workers, which subsequently impacts their decision to retire later. Conclusion: By conducting employee analyses, companies gain important information that leads to the timely and sufficiently frequent implementation of measures for managing older employees. With empirical data, we have sup­ported our prediction that the frequency of implementing measures through which companies can influence older workers’ decisions for later retirement is associated with the frequent conduction of employee analyses. This article has contributed to our understanding of ageing and the treatment of older workers. It has also highlighted a softer approach to promoting prolonged work engagement for older employees as an alternative to unwanted, legally im­posed later retirement. Keywords: An ageing population, Management of older workers, Education and training, Knowledge transfer and career, Health management, Later retirement 1Received: 27th March 2023; accepted: 25th July 2023 Table 1: Descriptive statistics of variables needed to test H1a, H1b, and H1 N Min Max Mean Std. Dev. Frequency of conducting analyses of employees’ competencies and qualifications in the company. 58 1 5 3,28 1,039 Measures for the education and training of older workers. Conducting analyses of educational needs. 59 1 5 3,86 1,106 Designing an education plan. 58 2 5 4,05 0,999 Implementing training and education programs specifically tailored for older workers. 59 1 5 2,83 1,206 Evaluation of education and training of older workers. 59 1 5 2,66 1,169 Motivating older workers for education. 59 1 5 3,19 1,210 Implementing various on-the-job training methods during work (instruction, mentoring, assistance, ...). 59 1 5 3,58 1,248 Implementing various educational methods that do not take place on the job (lectures, workshops, brainstorming, distance learning). 58 1 5 2,93 1,122 Implementing programs in the context of lifelong learning (until the end of employment). 59 1 5 2,61 1,175 The overall average frequency of implementing measures for the edu­cation and training of older workers. 59 1,25 5,00 3,21 0,838 Table 2: Results of testing H1a The overall average frequency of implementing measures for the education and training of older workers. Frequency of conducting analyses of employees’ com­petencies and qualifications in the company. Pearson Correlation 0,577*** Sig. (1-tailed) <0,001 N 58 *** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed). Table 3: Results of testing H1b Frequency of conducting analyses of employees’ competencies and qualifi­cations in the company. Measures for the education and training of older workers. Conducting analyses of educational needs. Pearson Correlation 0,366*** Sig. (1-tailed) 0,002 N 58 Designing an education plan. Pearson Correlation 0,318*** Sig. (1-tailed) 0,008 N 57 Implementing training and education programs specifi­cally tailored for older workers. Pearson Correlation 0,399*** Sig. (1-tailed) <0,001 N 58 Evaluation of education and training of older workers. Pearson Correlation 0,463*** Sig. (1-tailed) <0,001 N 58 Motivating older workers for education. Pearson Correlation 0,428*** Sig. (1-tailed) <0,001 N 58 Implementing various on-the-job training methods during work (instruction, mentoring, assistance, ...). Pearson Correlation 0,468*** Sig. (1-tailed) <0,001 N 58 Implementing various educational methods that do not take place on the job (lectures, workshops, brainstorm­ing, distance learning). Pearson Correlation 0,384*** Sig. (1-tailed) 0,002 N 57 Implementing programs in the context of lifelong learn­ing (until the end of employment). Pearson Correlation 0,486** Sig. (1-tailed) <0,001 N 58 Table 4: Descriptive statistics of variables needed to test H2a, H2b, and H2 N Min Max Mean Std. Dev. Frequency of conducting analyses of employees’ competencies and qualifications in the company. 58 1 5 3,28 1,039 Measures for knowledge transfer and career development of older workers. Identification and transfer of key knowledge of older em­ployees in the company. 59 1 5 3,34 0,993 Discussions with older workers on knowledge transfer before retirement. 59 1 5 3,56 1,055 Utilizing various methods for knowledge transfer. 59 1 5 3,32 1,025 Formation of mixed work teams (involving both older and younger employees; intergenerational collaboration). 59 2 5 3,53 0,916 Aligning job requirements with the abilities and capabilities of older workers. 59 2 5 3,34 0,958 Systematic assignment of employees with similar knowl­edge. 59 1 5 3,22 1,001 Offering career development opportunities. 59 1 5 3,42 1,102 The overall average frequency of implementing measures for knowl­edge transfer, and career development of older workers. 59 1,86 5,00 3,39 0,766 Table 5: Results of testing H2a The overall average frequency of implementing measures for knowledge transfer, and career development of older workers. Frequency of conducting analyses of employees’ com­petencies and qualifications in the company. Pearson Correlation 0,583*** Sig. (1-tailed) <0,001 N 58 *** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed) Table 6: Results of testing H2b Frequency of con­ducting analyses of employees’ competen­cies and qualifications in the company. Measures for knowledge transfer and career development of older workers. Identification and transfer of key knowledge of older employees in the company. Pearson Correlation 0,453*** Sig. (1-tailed) <0,001 N 58 Discussions with older workers on knowledge transfer before retirement. Pearson Correlation 0,525*** Sig. (1-tailed) <0,001 N 58 Utilizing various methods for knowledge transfer. Pearson Correlation 0,471*** Sig. (1-tailed) <0,001 N 58 Formation of mixed work teams (involving both older and younger employees; intergenerational collabora­tion). Pearson Correlation 0,359*** Sig. (1-tailed) 0,003 N 58 Aligning job requirements with the abilities and capabili­ties of older workers. Pearson Correlation 0,448*** Sig. (1-tailed) <0,001 N 58 Systematic assignment of employees with similar knowl­edge. Pearson Correlation 0,444*** Sig. (1-tailed) <0,001 N 58 Offering career development opportunities. Pearson Correlation 0,432*** Sig. (1-tailed) <0,001 N 58 *** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed). Table 7: Descriptive statistics of variables needed to test H3a, H3b, and H3 N Min Max Mean Std. Dev. Frequency of conducting analyses of the health structure of company employees. 58 1 5 3,29 1,200 Measures for managing the health of older workers. Formulating rules regarding health and safety in the workplace. 59 2 5 4,42 0,814 Organising health promotion programs (workshops, seminars, ...). 59 2 5 4,05 0,899 Providing additional health insurance coverage. 58 1 5 2,47 1,856 Organising age-related health check-ups. 59 1 5 2,80 1,584 Organising fitness exercises and sports activities. 58 1 5 3,31 1,524 Offering healthy food options. 59 1 5 3,32 1,570 Organising education on work and safety upon entering the company or taking on a new position. 59 1 5 4,59 ,931 Raising awareness and promoting a healthy lifestyle. 59 1 5 3,85 1,080 Implementing programs for achieving work-life balance. 59 1 5 2,90 1,255 Implementing programs and tools for stress management among older workers and well-being programs. 59 1 5 2,78 1,233 Incorporating health promotion into company communication. 59 1 5 3,73 1,215 Promoting awareness of the importance of health among employees. 59 1 5 3,73 1,064 Offering rehabilitation program options. 59 1 5 2,08 1,236 The overall average frequency of implementing measures for managing the health of older workers. 59 1,85 4,92 3,39 0,776 Table 8: Results of testing H3a The overall average frequency of implementing measures for managing the health of older workers. Frequency of conducting analyses of the health struc­ture of company employees. Pearson Correlation 0,351*** Sig. (1-tailed) 0,003 N 58 ***. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed) Table 9: Results of testing H3b Frequency of conducting analyses of the health structure of company employees. Measures for managing the health of older workers. Formulating rules regarding health and safety in the workplace. Pearson Correlation 0,215* Sig. (1-tailed) 0,053 N 58 Organising health promotion programs (workshops, seminars, ...). Pearson Correlation 0,291** Sig. (1-tailed) 0,013 N 58 Providing additional health insurance coverage. Pearson Correlation -0,068 Sig. (1-tailed) 0,691 N 57 Organising age-related health check-ups. Pearson Correlation 0,277** Sig. (1-tailed) 0,018 N 58 Organising fitness exercises and sports activities. Pearson Correlation 0,216* Sig. (1-tailed) 0,053 N 57 Offering healthy food options. Pearson Correlation 0,140 Sig. (1-tailed) 0,148 N 58 Organising education on work and safety upon entering the company or taking on a new position. Pearson Correlation 0,188* Sig. (1-tailed) 0,079 N 58 Raising awareness and promoting a healthy lifestyle. Pearson Correlation 0,221** Sig. (1-tailed) 0,048 N 58 Implementing programs for achieving work-life balance. Pearson Correlation 0,344*** Sig. (1-tailed) 0,004 N 58 Implementing programs and tools for stress management among older workers and well-being programs. Pearson Correlation 0,338*** Sig. (1-tailed) 0,005 N 58 Incorporating health promotion into company communication. Pearson Correlation 0,305*** Sig. (1-tailed) 0,010 N 58 Promoting awareness of the importance of health among employees. Pearson Correlation 0,279** Sig. (1-tailed) 0,017 N 58 Offering rehabilitation program options. Pearson Correlation 0,192* Sig. (1-tailed) 0,075 N 58 ***. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (1-tailed). *. Correlation is significant at the 0.1 level (1-tailed). Anxo, D., Ericson, T., & Jolivet, A. (2012). Working longer in European countries: underestimated and unexpected effects, International Journal of Manpower, 33(6), 612-628. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437721211261787 Barschkett, M., Geyer, J., Haan, P., & Hammerschmid, A. (2022).The effects of an increase in the retirement age on health — Evidence from administrative data. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Volume 23, Retrieved 26. 2. 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeoa.2022.100403. Baruch, Y., Sayce, S., & Gregoriou, A. (2014). Retirement in a global labour market: a call for abolishing the fixed retirement age, Personnel Review, 43(3), 464-482. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2013-0059 Bayl-Smith, P., & Griffin, B. (2014). Age discrimination in the workplace: Identifying as a late-career worker and its relationship with engagement and intended retire­ment age. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 44. 588-599. 10.1111/jasp.12251. Blomqvist, S., Westerlund, H., Alexanderson, K., & Mag­nusson Hanson, L. L. (2020). Labor market exit around retirement age in Sweden and trajectories of psycho­tropic drugs in a context of downsizing. BMC Pub­lic Health, 20(1), 618-712. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08589-6 Bloom D.E., & Luca, D.L. (2016). The Global Demogra­phy of Aging: Facts, Explanations, Future. In J. Piggott & A. Woodland (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging (pp. 3-56). https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hespa.2016.06.002. Bogataj, D., Battini, D., Calzavara, M., & Persona, A. (2019). The ageing workforce challenge: Investments in collaborative robots or contribution to pension schemes, from the multi-echelon perspective, Interna­tional Journal of Production Economics, Volume 210, 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.12.016. Boehm, S. A., Schröder, H., & Bal, M. (2021). Age-Re­lated Human Resource Management Policies and Practices: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Conceptu­alizations, Work, Aging and Retirement, 7(4), 257–272, https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waab024. Buckle, P. (2015). Workplace infrastructure, future of age­ing: evidence review, Report commissioned as part of the UK government’s Foresight Future of Ageing pro­ject, Retrieved 9.2.2023 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/435072/gs-15-4-future-ageing-workplace-infrastructure-er24.pdf Calvo, E., Haverstick, K., & Sass, S. A. (2009). Grad­ual Retirement, Sense of Control, and Retir­ees‘ Happiness. Research on Aging, 31(1), 112–135. doi:10.1177/0164027508324704  CBS News. (2010). Violent Protests in France over Re­tirement Age. Retrieved 7.9. 2022 from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/violent-protests-in-france-over-re­ tirement-age/ Chasovschi, C. (2012). Human resources management maturity model. Toward a new model. The Annals of the „Stefan cel Mare“ University of Suceava. Fascicle of The Faculty of Economics and Public Administra­tion. 11(2(14)), 143-148. Retrieved 24. 4. 2023 from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scm/ausvfe/v11y2011i2(14)p143-148.html Conen, W.S., Henkens, K., & Schippers, J. (2012). Em­ployers‘ Attitudes and Actions Towards the Ex­tension of Working Lives in Europe. International Journal of Manpower, 33(6), 648-665. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437721211261804 Crawford, J., Davis, A., Minhat, H., & Baharudin, M. R. (2017). Healthy Workplaces in Europe and Malaysia. In M. Flynn, Y. Li, & A. Chiva (Eds.), Managing the Ageing Workforce in the East and the West (pp.165 – 184). Emerald Publishing. Doi: 10.1108/978-1-78714-638-920171008. De Grip, A., Lindeboom, M., & Montizaan, R. (2012). Shattered dreams: The effects of changing the pension system late in the game. Economic Journal, 122(559), 1–25. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02486.x  Derous, E., & Decoster, J. (2017). Implicit Age Cues in Resumes: Subtle Effects on Hiring Discrimination. Frontiers in psychology, 8 (1321), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01321 Dobrescu, L.I., & Smith, J.P. (2016). The HRS Around the World Surveys, In J. Piggott, & A. Woodland (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging (pp. 993-1018). https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hes­pa.2016.09.003. Donizzetti, A. R. (2019). Ageism in an Aging Society: The Role of Knowledge, Anxiety about Aging, and Stereotypes in Young People and Adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(8), 1329. doi:10.3390/ijerph16081329. Retrieved 14. 9. 2022 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517915/. European Commission, Eurostat. (2020). Ageing Europe: looking at the lives of older people in the EU: 2020 edition, (L.Corselli-Nordblad, H.Strandell, eds.). Lux­embourg: Publications Office of the European Un­ion. doi:10.2785/628105 European Communities. (2003). Older-people-in-work­ing-life: Presentations of relevant actions by local and regional authorities. CoR Studies E-2/2003. Luxem­bourg: Office for Official Publications of European Communities. Retrieved 28. 2. 2023 from https://cor.europa.eu/en/engage/studies/Documents/Older-peo­ ple-in-working-life/EN-older-people-in-working-life.pdf Eurostat (2020). Ageing Europe - statistics on popula­tion development. Retrieved 14. 2. 2022 from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?­ title=Ageing_Europe_-_statistics_on_population_de­ velopments Eurostat (2021). Demographic balances and in­dicators by type of projection. Online data code: PROJ_19NDBI. Retrieved 10. 12. 2022 from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrow­ser/view/PROJ_19NDBI/default/table?lang=en Eurostat (2023a). Employment and activity by sex and age - annual data. Online data code: LFSI_EMP_A. Retrieved 23. 2. 2023 from https://ec.europa.eu/eu­ rostat/databrowser/view/lfsi_emp_a/default/table?lan­ g=en Eurostat (2023a). Long-term unemployment (12 months or more) as a percentage of the total unemployment, by sex, age and citizenship (%). Online data code: LFSA_UPGAN. Retrieved 26. 2. 2023 from https://ec.euro­ pa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/lfsa_upgan/default/table?lang=en Eurostat (2023b) Employment rates by sex, age and citi­zenship (%). Online data code: LFSA_ERGAN. Re­trieved 1. 3. 2023 from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/LFSA_ERGAN/default/table?lan­ g=en Fasbender, U., & Gerpott, F. H. (2022). Knowledge Trans­fer Between Younger and Older Employees: A Tempo­ral Social Comparison Model. Work, Aging and Reti­rement. 8(2). 146–162. doi:10.1093/workar/waab017. Flynn, M. (2014). Representing an ageing workforce: Challenges and opportunities for trade unions, Re­trieved 6. 3. 2023 from https://www.tuc.org.uk/sites/default/files/RepresentingAnAgeingWorkforce.pdf Fuertes, V., Egdell, V., & McQuaid, R. (2013). Exten­ding working lives: age management in SMEs, Em­ployee Relations, 35(3), 272-293. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425451311320477 Grah, B., Dimovski, V., Penger, S., & Bogataj, D. (2019). Raziskovalni izzivi strategije dolgožive družbe. Izzivi managementu: revija o izzivih in dosežkih sodobnega managementa, 6(2), 4-15. Heintz, J. (2018). Tens of thousands of Russians protest retirement age hikes. Retrieved 7.9. 2022 from https://apnews.com/07039ed986a54d43940144282f0c431a Hennekam, S., & Herrbach, O. (2013). HRM practi­ces and low occupational status older workers, Em­ployee Relations, 35(3), 339-355. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425451311320512 Henkens, K. (2021). Forge healthy pathways to retirement with employer practices: a multilevel perspective. Work, Aging andRetirement, 8(1),1-6. doi:10.1093/workar/waab016 Hill, A. (2018). At least 1000 women protest at changes to UK pension age. Retrieved 7. 9. 2022 from https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/oct/10/thou­ sand-women-protest-at-changes-to-uk-pension-age Hilsen, A.I., & Olsen, D.S. (2021). What Do We Know About the Knowledge of Older Workers?. In: The Importance and Value of Older Employees. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2861-0_3 Ilmarinen, J. (2006). Towards a Longer Worklife!: Ageing and the Quality of Worklife in the European Union. doi: 10.1026/0932-4089.52.1.47. Ilmarinen, J.E. (2012) Promoting Active Ageing in the Workplace. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, Retrieved 23. 2. 2023 from https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/promoting-acti­ ve-ageing-workplace Jeske, D., & Stamov Roßnagel, C. (2015). Learning capa­bility and performance in later working life: Towards a contextual view. Education & Training, 57(4), 378–391. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-08-2013-0107 Kim, N., & Kang, S-W. (2017). Older and more engaged: The mediating role of age-linked resources on work engagement, Human Resource Management, Vol.56 (5), 731-746. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21802 Kooij, D. T. A. M., Jansen, P. G. W., Dikkers, J. S. E., & De Lange, A. H. (2010). The influence of age on the asso­ciations between HR practices and both affective com­mitment and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(8), 1111-1136. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.666 Lazazzara, A., & Bombelli, M.C. (2011). HRM practi­ces for an ageing Italian workforce: the role of trai­ning, Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(8), 808-825. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591111168339 Marvell, R., & Cox, A. (2017). Fulfilling work: What do older workers value about work and why? Brigh­ton: Institute for Employment Studies. Retrieved 9.2. 2023 from https://ageing-better.org.uk/sites/default/files/2017-12/What-do-older-workers-value.pdf Munnell, A.H., & Wettstein, G. (2020). Employer percep­tions of older workers – surveys from 2019 and 2006. Center for Retirement Research at Boston College Hovey House. Retrieved 20.4.2023 from https://crr.bc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/wp_2020-8..pdf Neupane, S., Kyrönlahti, S., Oakman, J., Siukola, A., Riekhoff, A.J., Kuivalainen, S., & C.H. (2023). Can workplace intervention prolong work life of older wor­kers? A quasi-experimental study. Int Arch Occup En­viron Health 96(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01919-8 Ng, T., & Feldman, D. (2012). Evaluating six common stereotypes about older workers with meta-analytical data. Personnel Psychology, 65(4), 821-858. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12003. OECD (2019). Pensions at a Glance 2019. OECD Pub­lishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/b6d3dcfc-en Opatha, H.H.D.N.P. (2021). A Simplified Study of Defi­nitions of Human Resource Management. Sri Lankan Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(1), 15–35. doi: http://doi.org/10.4038/sljhrm.v11i1.5672 Parry, J., & Smeaton, D. (2018). Becoming an age-frien­dly employer: Evidence report. Centre for Ageing Bet­ter. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31038.74569 Pilipiec, P., Groot, W., & Pavlova, M. (2021). The Effect of an Increase of the Retirement Age on the Health, We­ll-Being, and Labor Force Participation of Older Wor­kers: a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Popu­lation Ageing, 14(2), 271-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-020-09280-9 Pinto, A.M.G.L.R.S., da Silva Ramos, S.C.M., & Nunes, S.M.M.D. (2015). Managing an aging workforce: What is the value of human resource management practices for different age groups of workers?. Tékhne, 12(S1), 58–68. doi:10.1016/j.tekhne.2015.01.007  Pirani, E., De Santis, G., & Zanasi, F. (2022). Retirement? Other Ways Out of the Labour Market Are Far More Worrying for Health: Results from a Matching Appro­ach Study. Journal of Aging and Health 34(2) https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643211039637 Previtali, F., Picco, E., Gragnano, A., & Massimo, M. (2022). The Relationship between Work, Health and Job Performance for a Sustainable Working Life: A Case Study on Older Manual Employees in an Italian Steel Factory. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), [14586]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114586 Rožman, M., Treven, S., Mulej, M., & Cancer, V. (2019). Creating a healthy working environment for older employees as part of social responsibility. Kyber­netes, 48(5), 1045-1059. doi:10.1108/K-12-2017-0483  Schröder, H., Muller-Camen, M., & Flynn, M. (2014). The management of an ageing workforce: organisational policies in Germany and Britain. Human Resource Ma­nagement Journal, 24(4), 394–409. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12043  Shah, S. (2023). What to Know About the Retirement Age Protests in France. January 19, 2023. Time. Retrieved 23. 2. 2023 from https://time.com/6248668/paris-fran­ ce-protests-retirement-age/ Shai, O. (2018). Is retirement good for men’s health? Evi­dence using a change in the retirement age in Israel. Journal of Health Economics, January;57, 15–30. do­i:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.10.008  Shams Zare, M., Tahmasebi, R., & Yazdani, H. (2018). Maturity assessment of HRM processes based on HR process survey tool: a case study. Business Process Management Journal, 24(3), 610-634. doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-01-2017-0008. Standing, G. (2017). The precariat: the new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic. TUC (2021). Extending working lives - How to support ol­der workers (12 Mar 2021), Retrieved 23.2. 2023 from https://www.tuc.org.uk/research-analysis/reports/ex­tending-working-lives-how-support-older-workers Turek, K., & Perek-Bialas, J. (2013). The role of em­ployers opinions about skills and productivity of ol­der workers: Example of Poland. Employee Relations, 35(6), 648-664. Doi: 10.1108/ER-04-2013-0039. Turek, K., & Henkens, K. (2020). How Skill Requirements Affect the Likelihood of Recruitment of Older Workers in Poland: The Indirect Role of Age Stereotypes. Work employment and society, 34(4), 550-570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019847943 Van Dalen, H., & Henkens, K. (2020). Do stereotypes about older workers change? A panel study on chan­ging attitudes of managers, International Journal of Manpower, 41(5), 535-550. DOI 10.1108/IJM-09-2018-0300 Van Dalen, H. P., Henkens, K., Henderikse, W., & Schippers, J. (2010a). Do European employers support later retirement?. International Journal of Manpower. 4. 360-373. doi: 10.1108/01437721011050620 Van Dalen, H., Henkens, K., & Schippers, J. (2010b). Pro­ductivity of older workers: Perceptions of employers and employees. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 309-330. doi:10.2307/25699062 Varianou-Mikellidou, C., Boustras, G., Dimopoulos, C., Wybo, J. L., Guldenmund, F. W., Nicolaidou, O., & Anyfantis, I. (2019). Occupational health and safe­ty management in the context of an ageing work­force. Safety Science, 116, 231-244. https://doi.or­g/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.03.009 Vasconcelos, A.F. (2018). Older workers as a source of wisdom capital: broadening perspectives, Revista de Gestăo, 25 (1), 102-118. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-11-2017-002 4/13 Vidmar, A., Jerebic, J., & Novak, V. (2021). A compa­rative analysis of the aspects of managing older em­ployees in Slovenian large companies. In P. Šprajc et al. (Eds.),  40th International Conference on Orga­nizational Science Development: values, competen­cies and changes in organizations (pp. 1075-1091). DOI: 10.18690/978-961-286-442-2.73 Voss, M. W., Wadsworth, L. L., Birmingham, W., Merryman, M. B., Crabtree, L., Subasic, K., & Hung, M. (2020). Health effects of late-career unemployment. Journal of Aging and Health, 32(1-2), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264318806792 Whitley, E., & Popham, F. (2017). Leaving the labour mar­ket later in life: How does it impact on mechanisms for health?. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 74(12), 877-886. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-104258 Ybema, J. F., van der Meer, L., & Leijten, F. R. M. (2016). Longitudinal Relationships Between Orga­nizational Justice, Productivity Loss, and Sickness Ab­sence Among Older Employees. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 23(5), 645–654. doi:10.1007/s12529-016-9546-y  ZDR-1. (2013). Zakon o delovnih razmerjih (ZDR-1). Retrieved 27. 2. 2022 from https://zakonodaja.com/zakon/zdr-1 ZDS (2010). Staranje delovne sile – priložnost za podjetja. Ljubljana: Združenje delodajalcev Slovenije ZGD-1-UPB3. (2009). Zakon o gospodarskih združbah, Uradni list RS, št. 65/2009. Retrieved 28. 2. 2023 from https://www.uradni-list.si/1/objava.jsp?sop=2009-01-3036 Vesna Novak is an Assistant Professor of Human Resource Management at the Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Maribor in Slovenia. Her research interests are mainly focused on the field of staffing, labour market, and the employment of vulnerable groups. Anja Vidmar excelled in her undergraduate studies at the Faculty of Organizational Sciences and received the prestigious Rector’s Award in 2022 for her academic achievements. During her internship at Heineken HQ, Anja played a pivotal role in assisting with the development of an intergenerational strategy aimed at fostering diversity, equity and inclusion among employees. Currently, she is pursuing her postgraduate studies at the Faculty of Economics in Ljubljana, further enhancing her knowledge and skills in the HR field. Janja Jerebic is an Assistant Professor of Mathematics at the Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Maribor, Slovenia. Her main research interests are graph theory and quantitative research in the field of education and organizational sciences. Alenka Brezavšcek is an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Organizational Sciences at the University of Maribor in Slovenia. She received her PhD in quality management from the University of Maribor. Her research interests include operations research and stochastic processes (theory and applications), system reliability and availability, maintenance optimization, and information and cyber security. At the Faculty of Organizational Sciences, she is the chair of the Department of Methodology. She has been involved in several applied projects focusing on production process and maintenance optimization. She has conducted several professional seminars on statistical analysis and information/cyber security for various audiences. Prizadevanja delodajalcev za spodbujanje starejših delavcev k poznejšemu upokojevanju – študija primera velikih podjetij v Sloveniji Ozadje in namen: Vecina razvitih družb se sooca s staranjem prebivalstva in s tem povezano problematiko delovne aktivnosti prebivalstva in vzdržnostjo pokojninskih sistemov. Države nastalo situacijo obicajno rešujejo z dvigom upokojitvene starosti, kar se najveckrat odraža v nezadovoljstvu delavcev, saj so take odlocitve vsiljene. Zato je bil glavni namen našega dela usmerjen v raziskavo analize izvajanja ukrepov ravnanja s starejšimi delavci v podjetjih, s katerimi bi posredno vplivali na odlocitve delavcev, da bi se odlocili za daljšo delovno aktivnost po svoji volji. Zasnova/metodologija/pristop: Raziskavo smo zasnovali na predpostavki, da podjetja, ki pogosteje izvajajo raz­licne analize svojih zaposlenih, vecjo pozornost posvecajo ukrepom ravnanja s starejšimi delavci. Pri tem smo se osredotocili na ukrepe, ki jih literatura navaja kot pomembne, da bi starejši delavci ostali zaposleni dalj casa. Vir podatkov je predstavljala raziskava avtorjev iz leta 2020. V vzorcu smo zajeli velika podjetja v Sloveniji, ki so imela vec kot 100 zaposlenih. Vprašanja smo zastavili odgovorni osebi za ravnanje s kadri. Izhodišcno vprašanje je bilo, ali je izvajanje analiz zaposlenih povezano z izvajanjem ukrepov usmerjenih v izobraževanje in usposabljanje, prenos znanj in karierni razvoj ter upravljanje z zdravjem starejših delavcev. Postavili smo tri krovne hipoteze, ki smo jih z uporabo testa linearne povezanosti tudi potrdili. Rezultati: Ugotovili smo, da podjetja, ki pogosteje izvajajo analize kvalifikacij in kompetenc zaposlenih, v povprecju pogosteje izvajajo tako ukrepe na podrocju izobraževanja in usposabljanja starejših delavcev kot tudi na podrocju prenosa znanj in kariernega razvoja starejših delavcev. Statisticno znacilno povezanost smo potrdili tako v splošnem kot tudi na nivoju posameznih ukrepov. Poleg tega smo ugotovili, da podjetja, ki pogosteje izvajajo analize zdravstve­ne strukture zaposlenih, v povprecju pogosteje izvajajo ukrepe na podrocju upravljanja z zdravjem starejših delav­cev. Zakljucili smo, da podjetja, ki pogosteje izvajajo analize zaposlenih, intenzivneje skrbijo za izvajanje ukrepov ravnanja s starejšimi delavci, kar posledicno vpliva na njihovo odlocitev za kasnejše upokojevanje. Zakljucek: Z analizami zaposlenih podjetja pridobijo pomembne informacije, ki vodijo v pravocasno in dovolj pogos­to izvajanje ukrepov za ravnanje s starejšimi zaposlenimi. Z empiricnimi podatki smo podprli naše predvidevanje, da je pogostost izvajanja ukrepov, s katerimi lahko podjetja pripomorejo na odlocitev starejših delavcev za daljšo delovno aktivnost, povezana s pogostim izvajanjem analiz zaposlenih. S clankom smo pripomogli k razumevanju problematike staranja in ravnanja s starejšimi delavci ter opozorili na mehkejšo možnost za daljšo delovno aktivnost starejših delavcev v izogib nezaželenim, zakonsko vsiljenim pogojem upokojevanja. Kljucne besede: Staranje prebivalstva, Ravnanje s starejšimi delavci, Izobraževanje in usposabljanje, Prenos zna­nja in kariera, Upravljanje z zdravjem, Poznejše upokojevanje