Chronotypes, Disruptive Behaviour, and Schedules in Classrooms: ‘Morningness’ and Psychomotor Agitation Sandra Figueiredo 1 • This empirical cross-sectional study explored the effect of chronotypes on classroom behaviour. One hundred and forty young Portuguese chil - dren, from 1st to 4th grades, were examined regarding their chronotype and disruptive behaviours occurring in the classroom. Three groups of chronotypes (i.e., morning, intermediate and evening) were identified. The Chronotype Questionnaire for Children evaluated the chronotype of children, and the Conners Scale – reduced version for teachers (self- report) identified the frequency of the following behaviours in the class - room: psychomotor agitation, inattention, and opposition. Multivariate analysis of variance and analysis of regression parameters showed that morning children are more agitated and impulsive compared to even - ing peers. Concerning academic achievement, students did not differ in the subjects Portuguese and Mathematics for both semesters when considering chronotype and controlling for covariates such as age and gender. Parental qualifications appeared as an influential covariate for the chronotype effect in disruptive behaviour. This evidence addresses the contributions of school policies and family supervision regarding young children: children have earlier evening chronotypes; chronotypes impact specific disruptive behaviours in the classroom; parents’ educa - tion influences the sleep habits and behaviours of children in school; parents and schools need more support and evidence to correctly iden - tify children’ chronotypes, to understand how chronotype and sleep habits affect behaviours in the classroom, and to recognise that more studies should be replicated attending to the contextual factors of health outbreaks and war conflict. With reliable data, this study highlights con - cerns and novelties for education and psychology. Keywords: chronotype; school policy; disruptive behaviour; young children; psychology 1 Department of Psychology, Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa Luís de Camões (UAL); Psychology Research Centre (CIP) of UAL; Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), Lisbon, Portugal; sfigueiredo@autonoma.pt. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1454 Published on-line as Recently Accepted Paper: June 2023 c e p s Journal chronotypes, disruptive behaviour, and schedules in classrooms 2 Kronotipi, moteče vedenje in urniki v učilnicah: »jutranjost« in psihomotorična agitacija Sandra Figueiredo • Ta empirična presečna študija je preučevala vpliv kronotipov na vedenje v razredu. Sto štirideset majhnih otrok od 1. do 4. razreda na Portugal - skem je bilo vključenih v raziskavo o njihovih kronotipih in pojavlja - jočem se motečem vedenju v razredu. Opredeljene so bile tri skupine kronotipov (jutranji, vmesni in večerni). Z vprašalnikom o kronotipu za otroke je bil ocenjen kronotip otrok; s Connersovo lestvico – zmanjša - no različico za učitelje (samoocena) – pa je bila ugotovljena pogostost naslednjih vrst vedenja v razredu: psihomotorična vznemirjenost, ne - pozornost in nasprotovanje. Multivariatna analiza variance in analiza regresijskih parametrov sta pokazali, da so jutranji otroci v primerjavi z večernimi vrstniki bolj agitirani in impulzivni. Kar zadeva učne dosežke, se učenci pri predmetih portugalščina in matematika v obeh semestrih ob upoštevanju kronotipa in nadzoru kovariant, kot sta starost in spol, niso razlikovali. Kvalifikacije staršev so se pokazale kot vplivna kovari - anta za učinek kronotipa pri motečem vedenju. Ti dokazi obravnavajo prispevke šolskih politik in družinskega nadzora v povezavi z majhni - mi otroki: otroci imajo zgodnejši večerni kronotip; kronotip vpliva na določeno moteče vedenje v razredu; izobrazba staršev vpliva na spalne navade in vedenje otrok v šoli; starši in šole potrebujejo več podpore in dokazov za pravilno prepoznavanje otrokovih kronotipov, razumeva - nje, kako kronotip in spalne navade vplivajo na vedenje v razredu, in za prepoznavanje, da je treba ponoviti več študij ob upoštevanju okoliščin, kot so izbruhi bolezni in vojni spopadi. Ta študija z zanesljivimi podatki izpostavlja skrbi ter poudarja novosti za izobraževanje in psihologijo. Ključne besede: kronotip, šolska politika, moteče vedenje, majhni otroci, psihologija c e p s Journal 3 Introduction The investigation in chronobiology and psychology confirmed a rela - tionship between the 24-hour cycle and the behaviour of individuals (Díaz- Morales et al., 2015; Gowen et al., 2019; Holler et al.; 2014; Owens et al., 2015; al., 2016). In the circadian cycle, sleep is the most important factor in understand - ing behaviour changes, mood fluctuation, and cognition (Huang et al., 2020; Lara et al., 2014). The shifts are most commonly studied in the relationship between sleep and the performance of adults, focusing on cognition (Mazri et al., 2019; Melo et al., 2019; Melo et al. al., 2019; Razavi et al., 2019). There is a lack observed in the literature about children and pubescents and their cognitive fluctuations attending to their sleep changes and habits (Hahn et al., 2012; Lara et al., 2014). The predisposition to accomplish tasks needs to be understood, considering the chronotype and the youngest population. Chronotype and predisposition in 24-hour cycles The chronotype characterises individuals according to their preferences and willingness to perform their tasks at specific times of the day (Gobinath, 2020; Li et al., 2020; T ouitou et al., 2016). When we refer to the individuals’ prefer - ence, we mean their biological predisposition that biases wakefulness (thus with different wakefulness flows – being awake – in the 24-hour iterative period). Morning individuals prefer to wake up and do their chores earlier, while evening ones prefer to wake up and do their tasks later. However, individuals considered intermediate are able to adapt at any time of the day (Horzum et al., 2014). Therefore, the morning type reaches acrophase earlier and the evening one later; acrophase is defined as the moment when individuals are able to have better performance (Lara et al., 2014; Menna-Barreto & Wey, 2007; Walker et al., 2014, cited by Figueiredo, Hipólito & Tomás, 2018). These preferences and acrophases (and also bathyphases, when subjects are less awake and their cortisol is less active) have repercussions on daily per - formance (Lara et al., 2014). The external biological clock is not always aligned with the internal biological clock, which leads to synchrony failure or temporal incongruity, with the evening type being the most affected in terms of attention and psychomotor activation (Dorrian et al., 2017; Hahn et al., 2012). However, when there is no congruence between social and biological rhythms, which we call desynchronisation, consequences such as changes in physiological behaviours and disturbances that vary according to the chronotype can arise (Goldstein et al., 2007; Hahn et al., 2012; Kolomeichuk et al., 2016, as cited in Figueiredo et al., 2018). chronotypes, disruptive behaviour, and schedules in classrooms 4 Children’s sleep is essential in order for there to be no disturbances in the developmental stages of brain and sexual maturation, behaviour and in aca - demic performance (Rotta et al., 2018). Despite the abundance of studies on the relationship between adult chronotype and performance, there is a paucity of studies linking chronotype and behaviour in a school context (Oliveira et al., 2019), thus, in children. In Portugal, the continuation of valid studies on the influence of school-age children’s chronotype on their academic performance and classroom behaviour is urgently needed (Clara et al., 2020; Couto et al., 2011; Marques et al., 2019; Reis et al., 2020; Rodrigues et al., 2018). The evidence that authors provide on the correlation, and even predictive analysis, between children’s chronotype and their grades, is robust. However, the relationship be - tween classroom behaviour and the geographic variable has not been consid - ered (Friborg et al., 2014). Sleep, performance, and classroom behaviour International research shows that school hours affect adolescent behav - iour and discipline due to periods of inattention as a consequence of the chrono - type and delay in the phase that typically occurs in adolescence (Valdez et al., 2019; Zerbini et al., 2017). Adolescents, due to their genetic inheritance, prefer later times for the beginning of classes and assessments (Kelley et al., 2017; Wer - ner et al., 2021). This preference for later times has also been seen in the university student population (Kelley et al., 2017). When the late preference is mentioned, we are referring to the subjects’ cognitive predisposition to attend classes and carry out assessments, in an improved manner, at times later than those socially stipulated, and which favour the morning population. The decrease in perfor - mance leads to an increase in emotional instability and behavioural dysfunc - tion, which has consequences on the mental health of adolescents (Gariépy et al., 2019). As for the school-age population, the issue of chronotype is still a problem when analysing the relationship between daytime type and times conducive to performance and balanced behaviour in class. Indeed, the chronotype of younger children is not entirely morning, as previous studies of instrument validation in - dicate (Simpkin et al., 2014). Children have a considerable variance that places them between morning and evening (Figueiredo et al., 2020), and this will have consequences on the performance of tasks done at different times. The morning group will have an advantage in the morning hours, while the evening type will perform better in afternoon tasks (Figueiredo & Hipólito, 2021). Evening children have a longer delay in the levels of melatonin needed to fall asleep at expected times, as well as being exposed to bright light before bed, until at least two hours before bedtime (Martínez-Lozano et al., 2021; Kolomeichuk et al., 2021). c e p s Journal 5 With regard to discipline and disruptive behaviour in the classroom, studies are fewer for samples of children due to their chronotype characteri - sation. However, researchers in older studies found that sleep deprivation di - rectly led to performance problems and to instability in the classroom due to lack of attention but not hyperactivity problems (Fallone et al., 2005). Recently, analyses of disruptive behaviours and the possible relationship with the morn - ing type of children are lacking, except for some international studies (Sun et al., 2021). It is true that indicators were found in this relationship by Randler et al. (2016), as they determined that morning children (in the 9 th grade) have positive emotions that are manifested earlier in the day, in contrast to evening children, who have an optimistic mood later in the day. This type of emotional predisposition certainly influences the mood in the classroom and, in turn, the stability of behaviours (especially psychomotor). Eveningness as a risk factor in child development In addition to the study of mood and emotional expression in the 24- hour period, studies such as those by Doi et al. (2016) also suggest that sleep deficits in the evening group cause irritability at home and in social tasks. Ac - cordingly, this is another underlying factor in understanding the impact on discipline in the classroom. Considering the difference between morning and evening types, which affects the latter with regard to sleep, behaviour, and school performance, Arbabi et al. (2015) offer an essential reference to under - stand how the midpoint of sleep determines performance and motivation to learn in children in the first cycle (1 st –4 th grades) of education. Again, evening- type children show more negative values compared to the morning group re - garding learning and initiative during school hours. The reason was identified at the midpoint of late sleep in the evening population. In the predisposition to learning, variables such as conscientiousness and agreeableness are also in - cluded (Arbabi et al., 2015; Gorgol et al., 2020). The evening group is a population at risk insofar as Sun et al. (2021) recently identified behavioural problems in the classroom because of sleep defi - cits and evening habits. Moreover, this trend or correlation is seen from the first years of school, as Kobayashi et al. (2015) found that the first years of preschool had groups of students with disruptive problems due to the morning type and the number of hours of sleep. In contrast, when age and sex covariates are con - trolled, the modification of this correlation and the predictive trend can benefit the evening type and not so much the morning one (Gorgol et al., 2020). In short, the literature points to an almost solid relationship between the evening chronotype, lower academic and professional performance and lower chronotypes, disruptive behaviour, and schedules in classrooms 6 sleep quality (shorter periods of sleep, drowsiness, irritability, abrupt change in sleep habits). The child population, especially of school age, is the least studied, espe - cially regarding the behaviour in the classroom variable. Thus, this study aims to analyse the significance of the chronotype (considering the synchrony effect) of children aged 6–10 years in the relationship between the day type (morning/ evening), academic performance and classroom behaviour. Our assumption is based on the principle that children who are healthy (non-clinical samples) in terms of sleep will present differences in performance and discipline in the classroom depending on their chronotype. The time of day will determine per - formance, variation in attention and psychomotor balance, the latter being re - lated to stable behaviour in the classroom. Along with the evidence that attests to the correlation between sleep, individual performance, and classroom behaviour, there is a variability to be considered for careful examination, specifically regarding the eveningness, the school schedules and the children’s behaviours events. The evening type is negatively correlated with positive behaviours in the classroom when they are identified by teachers and psychologists. Thus , it is important to explore the correlation between sleep habits, eveningness, and disruptive behaviours that may occur in the classroom. The main objective of this study is to prove the causal relationship between eveningness and psychomotor agitation and disruptive behaviour in the classroom. Methodology Participants One hundred and forty children with a mean age of 8 years old, 53 (37 .9%) boys and 87 (62.1%) girls participated. After the data collection, we denoted that the chronotype questionnaire was mostly answered by the female parent (N = 116), who knows the daily sleep’ routine of the child well. Forty-four children attended the 3 rd grade (31.9%), 42 were in 1 st grade (13.8%), 33 children were in the 2 nd grade (23.9%), and 19 were in the 4 th grade (13.8%). All the schools are in Lisbon, Portugal. The parents’ level of education was informed through a sociodemographic questionnaire. More details appear in Table 1. c e p s Journal 7 Table 1 Sociodemographic Characterisation of Children (N = 140) N % Children’s age 6–7 years 38 28.8 8–11 years 94 71.2 Total 132 100.0 Gender Female 87 62.1 Male 53 37.9 Total 140 100.0 School grade 1 st grade 42 30.4 2 nd grade 33 23.9 3 rd grade 44 31.9 4 th grade 19 13.8 Total 138 100.0 Single child Yes 41 30.1 No 95 69.9 Total 136 100.0 If not (other) 0 7 7.6 1 33 35.9 2 44 47.8 4 8 8.7 Total 92 100.0 Number of children in the household 1 42 41.6 2 44 43.6 3 12 11.9 5 2 2.0 6 1 1.0 Total 101 100.0 Number of teenagers in the household 0 1 2.3 1 26 60.5 2 15 34.9 4 1 2.3 Total 43 100.0 Same biological parents Yes 66 61.1 No 42 38.9 Total 108 100.0 chronotypes, disruptive behaviour, and schedules in classrooms 8 Instruments The Children’s Chronotype Questionnaire (CCTQ), specifically the Por - tuguese version of CCTQ adapted and validated by Couto et al. (2014), was used as the first instrument in this study, based on the original of Werner et al. (2009). Attending to the objective of the present study, the collected data and the running statistical analyses were specifically based on the scale of Morn - ingness/Eveningness (M/E), one of the scales of CCTQ and in the chronotype scale composed of one item (parents should classify the sleep schedules and habits of their children). The M/E scale (0.711) evaluates the sleep habits and preferences of the child regarding sleep and awake times. There is a cut-off point determined for the three chronotypes: morning, intermediate, and evening types. The cut-off points are in - formed in the literature as follows: 10 (extreme morningness) and 49 (extreme eveningness). In the Portuguese version of CCTQ: <23 (morning-type), 24–32 (intermediate-type), >33 (evening-type). The chronotype was calculated by com - puting the 10 items and controlling for two age ranges (4–7 years old; 8–11 yr). Child behaviour assessment – the Portuguese version (Rodrigues, 2005) of the Conners Teacher Rating Scale was used in its reduced version of the Revised Conners Teacher Rating Scale (Conners, 1997). Teachers were required to answer 28 items concerning different behavioural characteristics on a Likert- type scale (0 to 3), where 0 corresponds to ‘Never’ and 3 to ‘Very frequent’ . The total compute indicates the frequency of negative behaviours. This instrument presents a four-factorial scale, and three scales were selected for this study: op - position problems (items 5, 15, and 23), inattention (1, 4, 8, 13, 14, 16, 19, 22, and 25), and motor activity problems (2, 9, 12, and 17). Research Design This study adopted an observational, statistical, comparative, and cross- sectional method. Firstly, in March 2021, the project was submitted and ap - proved by the Ethics Committee of the Psychology Research Centre (CIP) of Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa; then, it was submitted and obtained the consent of the Directorate-General for Education (DGE), Ministry of Educa - tion and Science, in Portugal. The research project and procedures were ap - proved by the National Data Protection Commission and by the Ethics Com - mittee of Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa. The sample was identified considering the grades and ages that met the criteria for the study. Secondly, the schools, teachers, and families were in - formed about the study and the main objective (consent was ensured by writ - ing from both parents and teachers). The third step was the administration of c e p s Journal 9 the two instruments in different sessions scheduled at schools and with families (two different moments according to the different instruments). The sessions occurred between March and April 2021. First, the CCTQ was answered by parents to identify the chronotype of each child. Only after the chronotypes were identified were we able to follow the next phase: the Conners Scale (Rodrigues, 2005), which was delivered in each school and supervised by teachers in class. This second phase took two weeks. The principles of the Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards were respected. The processing and statistical analysis were performed with SPSS, version 27. Results First, after the examination of the internal consistency for both scales, percentile analyses and multivariate analysis of variance were completed to determine the chronotypes and their influence on classroom behaviours. Ad - ditionally, normality tests were conducted to define the inferential methods of testing. Thus, when the normal distribution of samples was not respected, the Mann-Whitney U test accounted for the differences between the groups toward sleep habits and disruptive (if observed) behaviours. Part 1 The internal consistency of the first instrument (CCTQ) was satisfac - tory (0.62) but lower in comparison to Cronbach’s alpha of the original version (0.81). The values for the correlation matrix were above .30. To determine the chronotype of each child/adolescent, the percentile analyses and cut-off scores were completed as the statistical norm of the origi - nal version (Werner et al., 2009). Thus, percentiles informed each cut-off for the three chronotypes. The percentiles range is between 23 and 43 points (the cut-off was established by the first authors as described in the Instruments Sec - tion). After the score achieved in the M/E scale (by computation), considering the two age groups (4–7 years old/8–11 years old), the data revealed interesting differences between the two groups. Half of the students (47.8%) were classified as intermediate, then 27.8% were morning type, and 24.3% were evening type. In the Portuguese sample, we observed changes in the chronotype as we com - monly know it, with the children being more evening oriented than expected (the percentile 75 is higher than verified in previous studies that replicated the CCTQ in several countries). We are comparing only morning and evening chronotypes, disruptive behaviour, and schedules in classrooms 10 types. Y oung School populations reveal a tendency to a late phase in sleep hab - its, which determines the evening chronotype. This indicates the greater im - portance of behaviour changes in younger students than expected. Rapid sleep changes will impact behaviour in the classroom. Considering these facts, teach - ers and school psychologists should be aware of the school schedules when as - signed to a specific range of ages (of students). See Tables 2–4. Table 2 Morning / Evening Scale Score for Group 4–7 years of age N Valid 47 Missing 12 Median 29.09 Std. Deviation 4.84 Skewness .43 Kurtosis .55 Std. Error of Skewness .35 Minimum 20 Maximum 43 Percentiles 10 23.00 25 27.00 75 33.00 90 36.00 Table 3 Morning / Evening Scale Score for Group 8–11 years of age N Valid 63 Missing 10 Median 28.00 Std. Deviation 4.84 Skewness .58 Kurtosis .23 Std. Error of Kurtosis .59 Minimum 20 Maximum 42 Percentiles 10 23.00 25 26.00 75 31.00 90 35.60 c e p s Journal 11 Table 4 Sample characterisation according to Chronotype Frequency % % Valid % Cumulative Valid Morning 32 22.9 27.8 27.8 Intermediate 55 39.3 47.8 75.7 Evening 28 20.0 24.3 100.0 Total 115 82.1 100.0 Missing 25 17.9 Total 140 100.0 The results regarding the classification as presented by parents are con - cerning. Parents or tutors were unable to identify with precision their children’ sleep timetables and habits. Moreover, concerning the Q27 scale (chronotype from the perspective of the tutor or parent), 80 tutors informed that children had an evening tendency. There was a mismatch when we compared the per - centile punctuations and the results from Q27 (question referring to the type “nocturnal, diurnal”). It should be noted that Q27 is only a one-item scale, and intentionally, the terminology morning/evening and intermediate type was not used. Similar words (such as ‘nocturnal’) were used. Parents and tutors might need an intervention policy at schools in order to understand how school and home schedules are matching or generating blocking behaviours. More details about the results are in Table 5. Table 5 Results of the use of the Chronotype Scale N % Without a doubt of the morning type 17 13.4 More morning than evening 19 15.0 Neither morning nor evening 40 31.5 More evening than morning 20 15.7 Without a doubt of the evening type 20 15.7 Don’t know 11 8.7 Total 127 100.0 chronotypes, disruptive behaviour, and schedules in classrooms 12 Part 2 The Conners subscales (for teachers) presented a high internal con - sistency (Cronbach’s alpha: ≥0.80) despite the higher validity of the original version (≥0.90, Conners, 1998). The frequency of maladaptive behaviours (i.e., agitation and inattention) was evaluated in this way: ‘0-Never’ , ‘1-A Little’ , ‘2-Often’ , and ‘3-Very Often’ . The constructs and items considered were the fol - lowing: opposition behaviour (items 5, 15, and 23); inattention (items 1, 4, 8, 13, 14, 16, 19, 22, and 25); psychomotor agitation (items 2, 9, 12, and 17). The internal consistency of this second instrument was tested for the three subscales: opposition behaviour (0.84), inattention (0.93), and psycho - motor agitation (0.92). The correlation matrix proved that each subscale was measuring the respective construct with coefficients above r> .595 for all scales. The inter-item correlation was moderate to strong. Part 3 Hypotheses Hypothesis 1 – Differences are expected between morning, intermediate, and evening children concerning disruptive classroom behaviour, with preju - dice for evening subjects. When we refer to disruptive classroom behaviour, three constructs are being tested here: opposition (indiscipline in the form of a negative response to teacher’ demands and/or negative relationship with peers), inattention, and psychomotor agitation (excessive physical movements). Inattention is not as - sociated with hyperactivity disorder. The sample was revealed to respect the conditions of homogeneity of variance and normality distribution (Levene: p > .05). Based on this assumption, a multivariate analysis of variance was carried out. The results showed differences in a significant manner between chrono - types (morning, intermediate, and evening): F(2.110) = 3.156 p < .05, η2 = .054. The differences were identified specifically between morning and intermediate chronotypes with a bias for the morning chronotype. Morning-type children (M = 3.15) confirmed more oppositional behaviours in the classroom, while evening and intermediate types were shown to have similar behaviours (M = 1.91 for intermediate and M = 1.70 for the evening). c e p s Journal 13 Figure 1 Stem and leaf analysis: chronotypes* and oppositional behaviours Note. Morning, intermediate and evening types distributed in Y axis according to the oppositional behaviours in the X-axis (punctuations from the scale Oppositional Behaviour). To ensure the results displayed by the multivariate analysis, we decided to explore covariates in the model of variance by using the regression parame - ters homogeneity test. The controlled covariates were gender and age. The level of p did not change for the effect produced by the chronotype variable in the interaction model. Hypothesis 2 – Academic achievement is expected to be differentiated according to the chronotype. When we refer to academic achievement, we used the information pro - vided by the schools in this manner: 2 (‘insufficient’); 3 (‘sufficient’); 4 (‘Good’); 5 (‘Very good’); (-) (‘Does not attend and/or others’). In the first and second se - mesters, morning and evening children showed very similar grades in the Por - tuguese subject (semester 1: morning: 3.45 – evening: 3.48; semester 2: morning type with mean grade 3.57 – sufficient; evening children with 3.63 – Sufficient tending to Good). Similarities were also observed in the academic achievement means for mathematics, but the evening chronotype children showed slightly better results for this subject. The absence of significant differences was con - firmed with the multivariate analysis of variance, also when covariates such as gender and parents’ age were introduced. chronotypes, disruptive behaviour, and schedules in classrooms 14 Hypothesis 3 – Inattention behaviours and psychomotor agitation are more expected in the evening chronotype compared to morning children. Psychomotor agitation refers to excessive motor movements and inap - propriate behaviour; this is correlated to low levels of concentration. The regres - sion parameters homogeneity test showed an interaction effect that confirmed the relationship between chronotype, gender, and psychomotor agitation. For inattention, the conditions of variance were not seen to advance with the pa - rameters’ homogeneity test. Regarding the chronotype, gender had a significant moderate effect on excessive motor behaviour (F(1.71) = 8.492, p = .005; η2 = 1.07). Morning children were the most agitated compared to intermediate and evening types. For inattention, no differences were observed among the differ - ent chronotypes. The age of the children did not reveal a moderate effect in this equation. Hypothesis 4 – The chronotype is expected to have different impacts on oppositional behaviour depending on age. The results of one univariate analysis of variance demonstrated that age did not influence oppositional behaviours. Differently, when the regression pa - rameters test was conducted, the covariate related to the academic qualifica - tions of parents revealed the effect of children’ age and chronotype ( F(1,11) = 32.323 p = .000; η2 = .0746). After the introduction of the covariates gender, ed - ucational level of parents, and extracurricular activities of children, the parents’ skills were the only producing effect for age (and chronotype) in oppositional behaviours. Through a chi-square test, data indicated that parents with higher educational levels had children more identified in the chronotype ‘morning - ness’ . Also, the chi-square showed that older children (10 years old) are mostly morning type, and females tend to have more morning tendency when com - pared to males. Details are found in Table 6. c e p s Journal 15 Table 6 Relationship between Chronotype, Age, and Gender Morning type Intermediate type Evening type N % N % N % Gender Female 16 22.5 39 54.9 16 22.5 Male 16 36.4 16 36.4 12 27.3 Age 5 0 0 1 100 0 0 6 7 30.4 14 60.9 2 8.7 7 4 17.4 8 34.8 11 47.8 8 7 25.9 14 51.9 6 22.2 9 7 26.9 15 57.7 4 15.4 10 7 77.8 1 11.1 1 11.1 11 0 0 0 0 1 100 In conclusion, morning children have more oppositional behaviours in the classroom, and they are older; academic achievement did not suffer from the influence of chronotype in both semesters; morning children presented as being more agitated and excessive in movements when controlled for gender variables; inattention was not observed with significant differences within groups; paren - tal education has an influence on oppositional behaviours when age is entered as a covariate in the interaction model with chronotype. Along with the testing procedure, covariates and interaction models were important in identifying the effect of chronotype for the two constructs: opposition and agitation. Impulsivity (agitation) is seriously affected by chronotype when controlled for age. Discussion When considering the results obtained and the four hypotheses of this empirical study, it is seen that the reliability of the instruments used was posi - tive, with a better Cronbach index for Conner’s scale. The first highlight is the fact that morning children were the group with more disruptive behaviours, specifically regarding opposition and psychomotor agitation. The second highlight is identified in the chronotypes evaluated: Portuguese children were mostly intermediate and evening types. Thirdly, gender was more influential than the chronotype effect in the disruptive behaviours in the classroom. Age only showed an effect on the educational level of parents when referring to the chronotype impact on impulsivity in the classroom. chronotypes, disruptive behaviour, and schedules in classrooms 16 This study showed evidence that enhances new insights into the tradi - tional statement about young children with the morning chronotype. Against that traditional evidence, we also should add the observation that females were more evening than morning type. Sleep habits and behaviours are more nega - tive for the evening chronotype, which will have consequences for the behav - iour of young children (i.e., from 1 st to 4 th grades) in school (Kim et al., 2002). The contribution of this study supports the understanding of regulation in childhood development and how sleep patterns may affect school behaviour in the age group of 4–11 years old. The cut-off points observed after the percentile analyses indicated that the new generation of children in the first grades of school is changing with regard to sleep behaviour. This refers to wake-up and bedtime schedules that are becoming different. Young children tend to be more evening chronotype than in the morning, as expected. Later times of sleeping and wakefulness are different, which may explain more agitated behaviour in classrooms. The acro - phases (optimal periods to learn and to be evaluated concerning academic per - formance) will also change when the sleep hours become later (Lara et al., 2014; Dorrian et al., 2017; Hahn et al., 2012). The synchrony effect could be disrupted with prejudice for mood and academic balance (Goldstein et al., 2007; Hahn et al., 2012; Kolomeichuk et al., 2016). Regarding Hypothesis 1, differences between chronotypes confirmed the impact on oppositional behaviour. Morning chronotypes were more disrup - tive in the classroom, specifically for the construct of oppositional behaviour. Morningness presented fewer less positive behaviours that, normally, were at - tributed to eveningness (indiscipline or negative response to teacher demand, easy irritability related to high cortisol levels; Martínez-Lozano, 2020). Sleep deprivation, associated with eveningness, causes disruptive behaviours in sev - eral settings and social jetlag. The latter is profoundly associated with poor re - lationships with peers at school. If young children in our study present charac - teristics of intermediate and evening types, social jetlag will be a problem. This evidence is not supported by recent studies by Jafar et al. (2017), Kivela et al. (2018) and Martínez-Lozano (2020) that found oppositional problems in young children with the evening chronotype. We believe that the main argument in this conflict of evidence is the poor examination of the chronotype of children. The instruments used are not quite reliable, and parents (the respondents of the children’ chronotype ques - tionnaire) do not seem to have knowledge about chronotype, sleep patterns, and the importance of identifying them to regulate the synchrony of their chil - dren with the school schedules. Very scarce literature is found regarding the c e p s Journal 17 examination of children’ chronotype and its impact on classroom behaviour in different countries and populations. To summarise, Hypothesis 1 was con - firmed, but with prejudice for morning children. In regards to Hypothesis 2, it was rejected. No differences were observed when comparing morning and evening children for academic achievement. These data are in line with those of Roeser et al. (2013) and Randler et al. (2016) because the chronotype was not directly related to the children’s academic achievement. As for Hypothesis 3, it was not confirmed. Eveningness was not corre - lated to high levels of inattention and agitation. The morning chronotype was associated with those behaviours, which is new evidence for investigation in the educational policies and psychology of sleep. The evidence of Kang et al. (2015) is no longer supported when evening children are constantly associated with negative behaviours and offences in a classroom setting. Evening children are commonly related to poor mental health, and this scenario is not necessarily supported by the current data (Fabian et al., 2016). Regarding current scenar - ios, we should consider that these instruments were administered during the Covid-19 pandemic in Portugal. At that time, children and families remained at home and in isolation, which required school classes and working to be online (Figueiredo et al., 2022). The transition from and to in-person/online class - rooms between waves of Covid-19 had serious implications. These implications were met immediately, for example, in sleep changes of children, including later hours of bedtime, later schedules of being awake and disruptive schedules. Morning and evening types are not the same as had been known. Examination of the chronotype during and after Covid-19 implies new evidence and educa - tional and psychological support in the current global situation (Pickren et al., 2022; Türkoğlu et al., 2020). Hypothesis 4 was partially confirmed. Age only has a significant effect as a covariate in the interaction model, including the chronotype and parents’ edu - cational level. This evidence is congruent with recent studies (Karan et al., 2021; Haldar et al., 2021) that attested to the academic skills of the parents as a determi - nant for the chronotype variance of children. According to Haldar et al. (2021), evening-type children come from families with high levels of academic qualifica - tions, which impacts the sleep hygiene of children. On the contrary, in the present study, evening children have parents with high qualifications. This contradiction between studies may be due to the Covid-19 outbreak and the sleep changes in families during lockdowns. Further studies should examine this variable for the children’ s chronotype and respective sleep habits (Sládek et al., 2020). The current context is a main covariate to be taken into account. In contrast, other studies chronotypes, disruptive behaviour, and schedules in classrooms 18 focused on the chronotype of adolescents and not children, with default for ex - amining the covariates’ influence on sleep and classroom behaviour (Druiver et al., 2021). Contextual factors such as the Covid-19 outbreak and the current war conflict affecting different populations and continents affect sleep and children’s behaviours at school. The age variable was the main predictor. as addressed by previous investigations and by the main authors in the field of chronotype iden - tification (Werner et al., 2009). However, in our study, age was not so predictive; other factors, as mentioned, emerged to explain the results for oppositional and agitation in children in the first grades of school. Acknowledgements This work was funded by national funds through FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Foundation for Science and Technology) – as part of the project CIP/UAL – Ref. UIDB/04345/2020; and the Psychology Research Centre (CIP) of Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa/Universidade do Algarve. References Arbabi, T., Vollmer, C., Dörfler, T., & Randler, C. (2015). The influence of chronotype and intelligence on academic achievement in primary school is mediated by conscientiousness, the midpoint of sleep and motivation. Chronobiology International, 32(3), 349–357. Cespedes, F., Rifas-Shiman, S. L., Quante, M., Redline, S., Oken, E., & Taveras, E.M. (2019). Chro - notype, Social Jet Lag, and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Early Adolescence. JAMA Pediatrics , 173(11), 1049–1057. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2749344 Clara, M. I. & Allen Gomes, A. (2020). An epidemiological study of sleep-wake timings in school children from 4 to 11 years old: insights on the sleep phase shift and implications for the school start - ing times’ debate. Sleep Medicine, 66, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2019.06.024 Conners, C. K., Sitarenios, G., Parker, J. D., & Epstein, J. N. (1998). Revision and restandardization of the Conners Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS-R): factor structure, reliability, and criterion validity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology , 26(4), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022606501530 Couto, D. A. (2011). Questionário de Cronótipo em Crianças: adaptação portuguesa do Children’s Chro- notype Questionnaire [Chronotype Questionnaire for Children: Portuguese Adaptation of the Children’s Chronotype Questionnaire] [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. Universidade de Aveiro. https://ria.ua.pt/handle/10773/7488 Couto, D., Allen Gomes, A., Pinto de Azevedo, M. H., Bos, S. M. C., Leitão, J. A. & Silva, C. F. (2014). The European Portuguese version of the Children ChronoType Questionnaire (CCTQ): reliability and raw scores in a large continental sample . Journal of Sleep Research, 23 (s1), 160. https://doi.org/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jsr.12213/abstract c e p s Journal 19 Díaz-Morales, J. F., Escribano, C., & Jankowski, K. S. (2015). Chronotype and time-of-day effects on mood during school day. Chronobiology International, 32(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2014.949736 Doi, Y ., Ishihara, K., & Uchiyama, M. (2016). Epidemiological study on chronotype among preschool children in Japan: Prevalence, sleep–wake patterns, and associated factors. Chronobiology Interna- tional, 33(10), 1340–1350. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/07420528.2016.1217231 Dorrian, J., McLean, B., Banks, S., & Loetscher, T. (2017). Morningness/eveningness and the syn - chrony effect for spatial attention. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 99, 401–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.11.012 Druiven, S. J. M., Riese, H., Kamphuis, J., Haarman, B. C. M., Antypa, N., Penninx, B. W . J. H., ... & Meesters, Y . (2021). Chronotype changes with age; seven-year follow-up from the Netherlands study of depression and anxiety cohort. Journal of Affective Disorders , 295, 1118–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.095 Fabbian, F., Zucchi, B., Giorgi, A., Tiseo, R., Boari, B., Salmi, R., Cappadona, R., Gianesini, G., Bassi, E., Signani, F., Raparelli, V ., Basili, S., & Manfredini, R. (2016). Chronotype, gender and general health. Chronobiology International, 33(7), 863–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2016.1176927 Fallone, G., Acebo, C., Arnedt, J. T., Seifer, R., & Carskadon, M. A. (2001). Effects of acute sleep re - striction on behavior, sustained attention, and response inhibition in children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 93(1), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2001.93.1.213 Figueiredo, S., João, R., Alho, L., & Hipólito, J. (2022). Psychological research on sleep problems and adjustment of working hours during teleworking in the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , 19(21), 14305. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114305 Figueiredo, S., & Hipólito, J. (2021). Association between parents’ supervision and the sleep habits of children: the impact of educational background of families in balanced sleep and wakefulness. Biological Rhythm Research. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09291016.2021.1909228 Figueiredo, S., Hipólito, J., Tomás, C. (2018). The relationship between chronotype and schedules for cognitive performance of Portuguese children. [A relação entre cronótipo e horários de desempenho cognitivo da criança Portuguesa]. Psicologia, Saúde & Doenças, 19(1), 42–49. https://dx.doi.org/10.15309/18psd190107 Fischer, D., Lombardi, D. A., Marucci-Wellman, H., & Roenneberg, T. (2017). Chronotypes in the US–influence of age and sex. PloS one, 12(6), 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178782 Friborg, O., Rosenvinge, J. H., Wynn, R., & Gradisar, M. (2014). Sleep timing, chronotype, mood, and behavior at an Arctic latitude (69 N). Sleep medicine, 15(7), 798–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2014.03.014 Gaina, A., Sekine, M., Kanayama, H., Takashi, Y ., Hu, L., Sengoku, K., & Kagamimori, S. (2006). Morning‐evening preference: Sleep pattern spectrum and lifestyle habits among Japanese junior high school pupils. Chronobiology International, 23(3), 607–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420520600650646 chronotypes, disruptive behaviour, and schedules in classrooms 20 Gariépy, G., Riehm, K. E., Whitehead, R. D., Doré, I., Elgar, F.J. (2019). Teenage night owls or early birds? Chronotype and the mental health of adolescents. Journal of Sleep Research, 28 (3), e12723. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.12723 Gobinath, V ., & Jothimani, T. (2020). Relationship between chronotype and happiness among healthy young adults. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology , 11(2), 88–92. https://www.proquest.com/openview/da161aa21d9e31f422da3b053a520501/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2032133 Goldin, A.P ., Sigman, M., Braier, G., Golombek, D. A., Leone, M. J. (2020). Interplay of chronotype and school timing predicts school performance. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(4), 387–396. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0820-2 Goldstein, D., Hahn, C. S., Hasher, L., Wiprzycka, U. J., & Zelazo, P . D. (2007). Time of day, intel- Time of day, intel - lectual performance, and behavioral problems in morning versus evening type adolescents: Is there a synchrony effect? Personality and Individual Differences, 42(3), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.07.008 Gorgol, J., Stolarski, M., & Matthews, G. (2020). On the moderating role of chronotype on the as - sociation between IQ and conscientiousness: the compensation effect occurs only in Evening-types. Biological Rhythm Research, 51(2), 318-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2018.1526483 Gowen, R., Filipowicz, A., & Ingram, K.K. (2019). Chronotype mediates gender differences in risk propensity and risk-taking. PLoS One, 14(5), e0216619. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216619 Hahn, C., Cowell, J. M., Wiprzycka, U. J., Goldstein, D., Ralph, M., Hasher, L., Zelazo, P .D. (2012). Circadian rhythms in executive function during the transition to adolescence: the effect of synchrony between chronotype and time of day. Developmental Science, 15(3), 408–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01137.x Haldar, P ., Debnath, S., Adan, A., Jankowski, K. S., Chattopadhyay, D., Maity, S. G., ... & Moitra, S. (2021). Role of Living Conditions and Socioenvironmental Factors on Chronotype in Adolescents. Adolescents, 1(2), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.3390/adolescents1020008 Höller, Y ., Gudjónsdottir, B. E., Valgeirsdóttir, S. K., & Heimisson, G. T. (2021). The effect of age and chronotype on seasonality, sleep problems, and mood. Psychiatry Research, 297, 113722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113722 Horzum, M. B., Önder, İ., & Beşoluk, Ş. (2014). Chronotype and academic achievement among online learning students. Learning & Individual Differences, 30, 106–111. https://b-on.ual.pt:2238/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.017 Huang, S., Jiao, X., Lu, D., Pei, X., Qi, D., & Li, Z. (2020). Recent advances in modulators of circadian rhythms: an update and perspective. Journal of Enzyme Inhibition & Medicinal Chemistry , 35(1), 1267–1286. https://b-on.ual.pt:2238/10.1080/14756366.2020.1772249 Jafar, N. K., Tham, E. K., Eng, D. Z., Goh, D. Y ., Teoh, O. H., Lee, Y . S., ... & Gusto Study Group. (2017). The association between chronotype and sleep problems in preschool children. Sleep Medi- cine, 30, 240–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2016.11.015 Jankowski, K. S. (2015). Composite Scale of Morningness: psychometric properties, validity with Munich ChronoType Questionnaire and age/sex differences in Poland. European Psychiatry, 30(1), c e p s Journal 21 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2014.01.004 Kang, J. I., Park, C. I., Sohn, S. Y ., Kim, H. W ., Namkoong, K., & Kim, S. J. (2015). Circadian prefer - ence and trait impulsivity, sensation-seeking and response inhibition in healthy young adults. Chro- nobiology International, 32(2), 235–241. https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2014.965313 Karan, M., Bai, S., Almeida, D. M., Irwin, M. R., McCreath, H., & Fuligni, A. J. (2021). Sleep–wake timings in adolescence: Chronotype development and associations with adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(4), 628–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01407-1 Kelley, P ., Lockley, S.W ., Kelley, J., Evans, M. (2017). Is 8:30 a.m. still too early to start school? A 10:00 a.m. school start time improves health and performance of students aged 13-16. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 11:588. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00588 Kim, S., Dueker, G. L., Hasher, L., & Goldstein, D. (2002). Children’s time of day preference: age, gender and ethnic differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(7), 1083–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00214-8 Kivelä, L., Papadopoulos, M. R., & Antypa, N. (2018). Chronotype and psychiatric disorders. Current Sleep Medicine Reports, 4(2), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40675-018-0113-8 Kobayashi, K., Takashi, Y ., Michiyo, Y ., Makio, O., Sachiko, I., Harumi, Y ., & Hiroyuki, D. (2015). Poor toddler-age sleep schedules predict school-age behavioral disorders in a longitudinal survey. Brain and Development, 37(6), 572–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.braindev.2014.10.004 Kolomeichuk, S. N., Randler, C., Morozov, A.V ., Gubin, D.G., & Drake C. L. (2021. Social Jetlag and Excessive Daytime Sleepiness from a Sample of Russian Children and Adolescents. Nat Sleep Science, 4(13),729–737. https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S290895 Lara, T., Madrid, J. A., & Correa, Á. (2014). The vigilance decrement in executive function is attenu - ated when individual chronotypes perform at their optimal time of day. PLoS One., 19(2), e88820. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088820 Li, T., Xie, Y ., Tao, S., Y ang, Y ., Xu, H., Zou, L., Tao, F, & Wu, X. (2020). Chronotype, Sleep, and Depressive Symptoms Among Chinese College Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. Frontiers in Neu- rology, 17(11), 592825. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.592825 Logan, R. W ., Hasler, B. P ., Forbes, E. E., Franzen, P . L., Torregrossa, M. M., Huang, Y . H., Buysse, D. J., Clark, D. B., & McClung, C. A. (2018). Impact of sleep and circadian rhythms on addiction vulner - ability in adolescents. Biological Psychiatry, 15(12), 987–996. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.11.035 Marques, D. R., Castilho, P ., Allen Gomes, A., & Pereira. A. (2019). Mindfulness and self-compassion along the chronotype: a cross-sectional study. Chronobiological International, 36(4), 541–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2018.1564323. Martínez-Lozano, N., Barraco, G. M., Rios, R., Ruiz, M., Tvarijonaviciute, A., Fardy, P . S., Madrid, J. A., & Garaulet, M. (2020). Evening types have social jet lag and metabolic alterations in school-age children. Scientific Reports, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73297-5 entificorts Mazri, F. H., Manaf, Z. A., Shahar, S., & Mat Ludin, A. F. (2019). The Association between Chrono - type and Dietary Pattern among Adults: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental chronotypes, disruptive behaviour, and schedules in classrooms 22 Research and  Public Health, 17(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010068 Melo, M. C. A., Abreu, R., Neto, V . A., De Bruin, P . H. S., & De Bruin, V . M. S. (2017). Chronotype and circadian rhythm in bipolar disorder: A systematic review. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 34, 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2016.06.007 Oliveira, A. W ., Silva, M, Alves, O., Silva, M., & Pinto, M. (2019). Influence of the sleep quality on the learning of sciences. [Influência da qualidade do sono sobre a aprendizagem no ensino de ciências]. Revista Psicopedagogia, 36(109), 73–86. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?pid=S0103-84862019000100008&script=sci_abstract&tlng=en Owens, J. A., Dearth-Wesley, T., Lewin, D., Gioia, G., & Whitaker, R. C. (2016). Self-Regulation and Sleep Duration, Sleepiness, and Chronotype in Adolescents. Pediatrics., 138(6), e20161406. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1406 Pickren, S. E., Harriott, E. M., Huerta, N. B., & Cutting, L. E. (2022). Impact of COVID‐19 on Chil - dren’s Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Symptomology, Daily Life, and Problem Behavior During Virtual Learning. Mind, Brain, and Education, 16(4), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12337 Randler, C., Bechtold, K., & Vogel, M. (2016). Chronotype and Time of Day do not Influence Math - ematical Achievement in Standardised Tests, but Impact on Affect-Results from a Field Experiment. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences , 8(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2016.05.006 Razavi, P ., Devore, E. E., Bajaj, A., Lockley, S. W ., Figueiro, M. G., Ricchiuti, V ., Gauderman, W . J., Hankinson, S. E., Willett, W . C., & Schernhammer, E. S. (2019). Shift Work, Chronotype, and Melato - nin Rhythm in Nurses. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 28(7), 1177–1186. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-1018 Reis, C., Pilz, L. K., Keller, L. K., Paiva, T., & Roenneberg, T. (2020). Social timing influences sleep quality in patients with sleep disorders. Sleep Medicine, 71, 8–17. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.sleep.2020.02.019 Rodrigues, P ., Vagos, P ., Pandeirada, J., Marinho, P .I., Randler, C., & Silva, C.F. (2018). Initial psycho- Initial psycho - metric characterization for the Portuguese version of the Morningness-Eveningness-Stability-Scale improved (MESSi ). Chronobiology International, 35(11), 1608–1618. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2018.1495646 Rodrigues, A. N. (2005). Contribute for the application of revised Conners’ Scales (1997) in the as - sessment process of ADHD (Part I) [Contributos para a utilização das Escalas de Conners Revistas (1997) no processo de avaliação da PHDA (Parte I)]. Revista de Educação Especial e Reabilitação, 12, 71–95. Roeser, K., Schlarb, A. A., & Kübler, A. (2013). The Chronotype-Academic Performance Model (CAM): Daytime sleepiness and learning motivation link chronotype and school performance in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(7), 836–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.12.021 Rotta, T, N., Filho, B, A, C., & Bridi, S, R, F. (2018). Plasticidade cerebral e aprendizagem: Abordagem c e p s Journal 23 multidisciplinar. [Brain Plasticity and Learning: Multidisciplinary Approach]. Artmed Sládek, M., Röschová, M. K., Adámková, V ., Hamplová, D., & Sumová, A. (2020). Chronotype assess - ment via a large scale socio-demographic survey favours yearlong Standard time over Daylight Sav - ing Time in central Europe. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58413-9 Simpkin, C. T., Jenni, O. G., Carskadon, M. A., Wright, K.P . Jr., Akacem, L. D., Garlo, K. G., & LeB - ourgeois. M. K. (2014). Chronotype is associated with the timing of the circadian clock and sleep in toddlers. Journal of Sleep Research, 23 (4), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.12142 Sun, W ., Kwok, N. T. T., Chan, N. Y ., et al. (2021). Associations of circadian factors with insomnia symptoms and emotional and behavioral problems among school-age children . Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 17(10), 2107–2114. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.9346 Touitou, Y ., Touitou, D., Reinberg, A. (2016). Disruption of adolescents’ circadian clock: The vicious circle of media use, exposure to light at night, sleep loss and risk behaviors . Journal of Physiology- Paris, 110(4), 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2017.05.001 Türkoğlu, S., Uçar, H. N., Çetin, F. H., Güler, H. A., & Tezcan, M. E. (2020). The relationship between chronotype, sleep, and autism symptom severity in children with ASD in COVID-19 home confine - ment period. Chronobiology International, 37(8), 1207–1213. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2020.1792485 Valdez P . (2019). Circadian Rhythms in Attention.   Yale Journal  of Biology and Medicine, 92(1),81–92. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6430172/ Werner, H., Albrecht, J., Widmer, N., Janisch, D., Huber, R., & Jenni, O. G. (2022). Adolescents’ pref- Adolescents’ pref - erence for later school start times. Journal of Sleep Research , 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13401 Werner, H., LeBourgeois, M. K., Geiger, A., Jenni, O. G. (2009). Assessment of chronotype in four- to eleven-year-old children: reliability and validity of the children’s chronotype questionnaire (CCTQ). Chronobiology International, 26(5), 992–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420520903044505. Wittmann, M., Dinich, J., Merrow, M., Roenneberg, T. (2006). Social jetlag: misalignment of biologi - cal and social time. Chronobiology International, 23(1–2), 497–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420520500545979 Zerbini, G., & Merrow, M. (2017). Time to learn: How chronotype impacts education. PsyCh Journal , 6(4), 263–276. https://b-on.ual.pt:2238/10.1002/pchj.178 chronotypes, disruptive behaviour, and schedules in classrooms 24 Biographical note Sandra Figueiredo, PhD, has a Degree in Languages T eaching (2005) and PhD in Psychology (2010), accomplished at University of Aveiro, Portugal. She is developing instruments and empirical studies about the school achieve - ment of immigrant young children (1) and empirical studies in chronopsychol - ogy and chronobiology. In 2018 completed 6 years post-doctoral research with funding from Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT). Currently she is Associate Professor of Psychology of Department of Psychology of UAL and she is integrated as Coordinator-Researcher in Psychology of Research Cen - tre (CIP) of Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. Also she is co-Editor of the indexed Journal Psique and expert in the board of ANI. The themes she is developing are related to the second language learners’ assess - ment, cognition and students’ achievement, instruments validation for schools and for skills evaluation, experimental studies in educational field, chronobiol - ogy and school performance, refugees’ empirical studies, among others. She published already more than 60 papers at international publications with peer- review and supervised a multimedia project for immigrants’ education support in Portugal (a mobile application – app GoGenius – was published in 2021/2022 for Android and IoS).