Genetic testing for young-onset colorectal cancer: case report and evidence-based clinical guidelines
Yaolin Zhou1, Lisa A. Boardman2, Robert C. Miller3
1	Mayo Medical School, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
2	Div'sion of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
3	Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
Received 29 December 2009 Accepted 10 January 2010
Correspondence to: Robert C. Miller, MD, MS, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail: miller.robert@mayo.edu
Disclosure: No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Background. Young-onset colorectal cancer is clinicopathologically different from older-onset colorectal cancer and tends to occur in patients with hereditary germline conditions such as Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis.
Case report. We describe the case of a 44-year-old man with a paternal history of colon polyps, a personal 2-year history of hematochezia, and a diagnosis of rectal cancer. Further clinical evaluation of the patient at our institution determined the cancer to be stage IIIA. The patient underwent genetic counseling and testing, which indicated he was negative for the most common familial cancer syndromes. After treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiother-apy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy, the patient has done well. We review the hereditary cancer syndromes and genetic tests to consider for patients with early-onset colorectal cancer. Conclusions. This case underscores the importance of following cancer-screening guidelines.
Key words: adenomatous polyposis coli; attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis; colorectal cancer; familial adenomatous polyposis; microsatellite instability; MYH-associated polyposis
Introduction	gle-gene-related cause of hereditary colon cancer
in North American and European populations.45
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignancy	CRC in Lynch syndrome has unique histopatho-
in North America and Europe; most patients have	logic and clinical findings. These cancers tend to be
sporadic disease without a known genetic predis-	more responsive to treatment despite being poorly
position to the illness. With the exception of the	differentiated.2
hereditary germline conditions Lynch syndrome,	One report based on the experience from 2 can-
familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), and attenu-	cer registries in the United States, the National
ated FAP, which are marked by an early age of on-	Program of Cancer Registries and the Surveillance,
set and familial CRC clustering, most cases of CRC	Epidemiology and End Results studies, empha-
do not develop until age 65 years or older. Still, up	sized that CRC is of concern for young adults: it
to 20% of all cases of CRC arise in persons aged	is among the top 10 cancers in persons aged 20
50 years or younger who do not have Lynch syn-	to 49 years of all races.6 Young-onset and older-
drome or FAP.1-3	onset CRC are clinicopathologically different in
Lynch syndrome, formerly known as heredi-	that young-onset CRC usually presents at a later
tary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, is caused by a	stage and is more poorly differentiated.6 Here, we
germline mutation in 1 of several DNA mismatch	present the case of a young middle-aged man with
repair (MMR) genes and is the most common sin-	rectal cancer.
Case report
A 44-year-old man sought medical care in 2001 for a 2-year history of hematochezia. Colonoscopy performed at an outside institution in September 2001 showed a lesion within the rectum. Biopsy performed at that time confirmed a poorly differentiated, grade 3 adenocarcinoma, which measured 2x1.3x1 cm, with invasion through the muscularis mucosa. He came to our institution in October 2001 for further evaluation.
The patient's family history of cancer was primarily limited to a brother who received a diagnosis of chronic myelogenous leukemia at age 47 years. His father had colon polyps removed in his mid 50s, and a maternal aunt had colon polyps at age 35 years. Distant paternal relatives may have had CRC in old age.
The patient had been a smoker for the previous 16 years and had a history of gastroesophageal reflux disease. He had a history of sebaceous cysts on the left scapula and the back of the thighs and a lipoma on the inferior border of the right scapula. He did not have supernumerary teeth.
Evaluation of the patient included genetics counseling and testing because of his young age at diagnosis (Figure 1). Immunohistochemical testing (IHC) for MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 showed intact MMR. The patient was not tested for the APC gene mutation because he was not suspected to have FAP (Figure 2). He was also not tested for MYH, which was not discovered until later.7
Endorectal ultrasonography with guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of suspicious lymph nodes confirmed an ulcerated lesion extending from the anal verge to 3.5 cm proximally along the anterior wall of the rectum. Fine-needle aspirates from 2 enlarged perirectal lymph nodes were positive for adenocarcinoma. In the ascending colon, a 5-mm hyperplastic polyp was removed with cold snare.
Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography detected a 0.6-cm sclerotic lesion within the left iliac bone, which was considered benign after a bone scan demonstrated no bony metastases. Results of upper endoscopy were normal. On the basis of the clinical evaluations, the patient's cancer was determined to be stage IIIA (T2N1M0) by the American Joint Committee on Cancer 6th edition criteria.
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was recommended on the basis of the tumor stage and the proximity of the tumor to the prostate. From November through December 2001, the patient was given a continuous infusion of radiosensitizing
5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (225 mg/m2). He was treated with 180 cGy in 28 fractions, for a total of 5040 cGy. He tolerated the therapy well, with some mild diarrhea, weight loss, decreased energy, and perianal irritation. The cancer in the rectum showed complete response to therapy.
In January 2002, the patient underwent surgery to have an abdominoperineal resection and permanent colostomy. He tolerated the procedure well, and no residual tumor was identified. Two of 31 regional lymph nodes were positive for grade 3 mu-cinous adenocarcinoma. In the following month, the patient had several perineal drain site infections and was treated for depression.
In April 2002 the patient began his first of 4 cycles of adjuvant 5-FU and leucovorin systemic chemotherapy. Prolonged neutropenia and gastrointestinal tract bleeding occurred in the middle of the first cycle of chemotherapy; therefore, the dosage of 5-FU (425 mg/m2) was decreased by 10% (to 380 mg/m2). He completed chemotherapy in August 2002.
Surveillance colonoscopies in the following years have been negative. The patient was last seen at our institution in January 2007. He has had no new gastrointestinal tract or genitourinary symptoms or problems. His appetite has returned to normal, and he feels strong. He has returned to work as a carpenter and is now being monitored with colonoscopy every 3 years.
Discussion
According to the Fearon and Vogelstein model of carcinogenesis, the accumulation of multiple mutations is required for the transformation of normal colonic mucosa into dysplastic adenomas and then into invasive carcinomas.4 CRC can be classified broadly as exhibiting either chromosomal instability through gain-of-function mutations (APC/ß-catenin pathway) or microsatellite instability (mSI) (defects in DNA MMR). In sporadic CRC, mutations are acquired in a stepwise fashion. In the case of single-gene hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes, all DNA-containing cells have a germline mutation in one allele of the involved gene and thus are a step closer to the accumulation of additional acquired mutations necessary to lead to CRC.
In human CRC, 80% of the tumors are microsatellite stable, which means they have intact DNA MMR and can correct single-base and small-loop base-pair mismatches present throughout the non-
Personal illness that predisposes patient to CRC (eg, inflammatory bowel disease)
Genetic counseling and special screening
No genetic screening necessary
FIGURE 1. Scheme describing the recommended initial evaluation of a patient aged 50 years or younger with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). AFAP indicates attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis; FAP, familial adenomatous polyposis; IHC, immunohistochemistry; JPS, juvenile polyposis syndrome; MAP, ^YH-associated adenomatous polyposis; MSI, microsatellite instability; PJS, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.
coding and coding regions of the genome. The remaining 20% of CRC tumors exhibit MSI due to defects in this DNA MMR pathway that corrects small base-pair mistakes in mononucleotide, dinu-cleotide, and trinucleotide repeat regions throughout the genome and are classified as having high or low MSI (MSI-H or MSI-L, respectively).5 A small fraction of MSI-H tumors result from germline mutations in 1 of 4 DNA MMR genes-MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and pms2 — and result in the hereditary CRC condition called Lynch syndrome. However, the greater proportion of MSI-H tumors arises via impairment of DNA MMR through hypermethyla-tion of the MLH1 gene.
Although only 15% to 20% of sporadic cancers are MSI-H, 90% of patients who meet the Amsterdam criteria for Lynch syndrome have MSI-H CRC.8 Tumor DNA can be evaluated for MSI using polymerase chain reaction to amplify a panel of DNA sequences with nucleotide repeats.
Lynch syndrome, an autosomal dominant disorder, is the most common hereditary colon cancer syndrome. Mutations in 1 of the MMR genes usual-
ly result in truncated or lost protein product. Thus, tumors can be screened for defective DNA MMR by using polymerase chain reaction to test for MSI or IHC to test for loss of MMR protein expression. The results of IHC may then be used to direct germline sequencing toward a specific DNA MMR gene in young-onset cases or in persons with clinical or family history criteria suggestive of Lynch syndrome. Hypermethylation assays and BRAF V600E mutation testing of tumor DNA can be used to distinguish an MSI-H tumor with absent MLH1 expression caused by hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter from a tumor caused by a germline MLH1 mutation. Tumors with hypermethylation of MLH1 and with the BRAF V600E mutation nearly always represent sporadic CRC not caused by a germline MLH1 mutation and not associated with Lynch syndrome.
In the case presented here, the patient was tested for a familial syndrome because of his relatively young age at presentation (44 years); however, he lacked many of the features of either FAP or Lynch syndrome. The genetic diagnosis of Lynch
Radiol Oncol 2010: 44(1): 57-61

Genetic counseling & special screening
h
1_ J Not currently used clinically
FIGURE 2. Scheme describing the recommended genetic testing for a patient with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer. AFAP indicates attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis; APC, adenomatous polyposis coli; BRAF, v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1; FAP, familial adenomatous polyposis; IHC, immunohistochemistry; MAP, MYH-associated adenomatous polyposis; MLHl, MutL homolog 1; MMR, mismatch repair; MSI, microsatellite instability; MYH, MutY homolog.
syndrome requires a germline mutation in 1 of the MMR genes. The patient's tumor showed normal expression of the MMR genes MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 by IHC. MSI testing was not performed. A previous study from our institution showed that a normal IHC test for MLH1 and MSH2 has a 96.7% positive predictive value for a microsatellite stable/ MSI-L phenotype.9 On the basis of the IHC data alone, it is highly unlikely that the patient has a germline mutation in an MMR gene, which would lead to Lynch syndrome with MSI.9
Another hereditary CRC syndrome that can be considered is myh-associated polyposis (MAP). MAP has a phenotypic overlap with FAP, attenuated FAP, and Lynch syndrome; biallelic carriers have an 80% cumulative lifetime risk of CRC by
age 70 years.10 In several studies, among patients with early-onset CRC (diagnosed before age 50 years) who tested negative for Lynch syndrome, 1% to 2% were biallelic carriers of the MYH mutation.11-13
CRC screening and testing recommendations
Although CRC does not usually develop until age 65 years or older, up to 20% of CRC cases will arise in persons 50 years or younger who do not have either of the known hereditary CRC conditions.1-3,614 The American Gastroenterological Association has published guidelines for CRC screening for aver-
age-risk and higher-risk patients.1516 Persons with a family history of CRC or adenomatous polyps (a first-degree relative with CRC or adenomatous polyps diagnosed before age 60 years, or 2 first-degree relatives with CRC diagnosed at any age) should have screening colonoscopy starting at age 40 years, or 10 years younger than the earliest diagnosis, whichever comes first, with repeat colonos-copy every 5 years.
If testing for MMR is negative, patients with early-onset CRC may be tested for MYH mutations, regardless of their family history or the number of colon polyps. IHC can be used in clinical practice to test for MAP regardless of the specific MYH mutations.17
Conclusions
The case presented here highlights that CRC can occur at an age younger than the cancer-screening guidelines suggest for average-risk patients and also shows the importance of using family history to determine the timing of the first CRC screening. Had our patient undergone his first screening colonoscopy at age 40 years as recommended by the American Gastroenterological Association— given that the patient's father had colon polyps removed before age 60 years—his CRC might have been diagnosed at an earlier stage. Similarly, the patient's 2-year history of hematochezia warranted a colon examination. We stress the importance of acknowledging and pursuing these symptoms, even in younger patients.
References
1.	Adloff M, Arnaud JP, Schloegel M, Thibaud D, Bergamaschi R. Colorectal cancer in patients under 40 years of age. Dis Colon Rectum 1986; 29: 322-5.
2.	Gryfe R, Kim H, Hsieh ET, Aronson MD, Holowaty EJ, Bull SB, et al. Tumor microsatellite instability and clinical outcome in young patients with colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 69-77.
3.	Moore PA, Dilawari RA, Fidler WJ. Adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum in patients less than 40 years of age. Am Surg 1984; 50: 10-4.
4.	Lynch HT, Smyrk TC, Watson P, Lanspa SJ, Lynch JF, Lynch PM, et al. Genetics, natural history, tumor spectrum, and pathology of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: an updated review. Gastroenterology 1993; 104: 1535^9.
5.	Peltomaki P, Vasen HF; the International Collaborative Group on Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer. Mutations predisposing to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: database and results of a collaborative study. Gastroenterology 1997; 113: 1146-58.
6.	Fairley TL, Cardinez CJ, Martin J, Alley L, Friedman C, Edwards B, et al. Colorectal cancer in U.S. adults younger than 50 years of age, 1998-2001.
Cancer 2006; 107(5 Suppl): 1153-61.
7.	Al-Tassan N, Chmiel NH, Maynard J, Fleming N, Livingston AL, Williams GT, et al. Inherited variants of MYH associated with somatic G:C^T:A mutations in colorectal tumors. Nat Genet 2002; 30: 227-32.
8.	Jenkins MA, Hayashi S, O'Shea AM, Burgart LJ, Smyrk TC, Shimizu D, et al; Colon Cancer Family Registry. Pathology features in Bethesda guidelines predict colorectal cancer microsatellite instability: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 2007; 133: 48-56.
9.	Lindor NM, Burgart LJ, Leontovich O, Goldberg RM, Cunningham JM, Sargent DJ, et al. Immunohistochemistry versus microsatellite instability testing in phenotyping colorectal tumors. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 1043-8.
10.	Jenkins MA, Croitoru ME, Monga N, Cleary SP, Cotterchio M, Hopper JL, et al. Risk of colorectal cancer in monoallelic and biallelic carriers of MYH mutations: a population-based case-family study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15: 312^.
11.	Eliason K, Hendrickson BC, Judkins T, Norton M, Leclair B, Lyon E, et al. The potential for increased clinical sensitivity in genetic testing for polyposis colorectal cancer through the analysis of MYH mutations in North American patients. J Med Genet 2005; 42: 95-6.
12.	Riegert-Johnson DL, Johnson RA, Rabe KG, Wang L, Thomas B, Baudhuin LM, et al. The value of MUTYH testing in patients with early onset microsatellite stable colorectal cancer referred for hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer syndrome testing. Genet Test 2007; 11: 361-5.
13.	Wang L, Baudhuin LM, Boardman LA, Steenblock KJ, Petersen GM, Halling KC, et al. MYH mutations in patients with attenuated and classic polyposis and with young-onset colorectal cancer without polyps. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 9-16. Erratum in: Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 1651.
14.	O'Connell JB, Maggard MA, Liu JH, Etzioni DA, Livingston EH, Ko CY. Rates of colon and rectal cancers are increasing in young adults. Am Surg 2003; 69: 866-72.
15.	American Gastroenterological Association. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: hereditary colorectal cancer and genetic testing. Gastroenterology 2001; 121: 195-7.
16.	Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, Bond J, Burt R, Ferrucci J, et al; Gastrointestinal Consortium Panel. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale: update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 544-60.
17.	Di Gregorio C, Frattini M, Maffei S, Ponti G, Losi L, Pedroni M, et al. Immunohistochemical expression of MYH protein can be used to identify patients with MYH-associated polyposis. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 439-44.