STUOKOVNE RAZNtAVti Superhighways and the Future of Public Services and Citizenship in the Information Age John Taylor Povzetek: V informacijski dobi je nujno potrebno, da opredelijo ponudniki javnih storitev in izvajalci telekomunikacij potrebno povezovanje svojih dejavnosti. Tako sodelovanje omogoča ponudnikom javnih storitev ustrezno strateško in operativno načrtovanju elektronskih storitev. Izvajalcem telekomunikacij pa zagotavlja globlje razumevanje povpraševanja po razširitvi infrastrukture; ob tem se jasno postavlja tudi vprašanje, kako naj se pokrivajo stroški takih i nf rastru kturnih naložb. Abstract; In the information age it is imperative that public service providers, on the one hand, and telecommunication s operators, on the other, identify the need to integrate their activities. For the public s en/ice provider this will open the way for proper strategic and operational planning of electronic services delivery. For the telecommunications operator it will secure a better understanding of market demand for enhanced infrastructure provision as well as bringing forward the quest/on of how the cost of such infrastructure investments should be met. The Coming of the Superhighway Tht' rhetoric has never been stronger than it is at present within debates about the information society. The heady images which gave rise to great optimism in the late 1970s about the beneficial 'impact' of information and communication technologies [ICTs] on society have returned with great force in the 1990s. Undoubtedly augmenting these contemporary visions lias been their championing 1 rom the G7 governments, the EU and the US. In the US in particular there is strong championing from the top of the administration, with the National Information Infrastructure [Nil] initiative being strongly promoted from the White House. The Nil is being promoted by government for the social and economic benefits which such an infrastructure might bring with it, including those deriving from the "reinvention of government". The potential for cost-saving, productivity-imp roving and service quality-enhancing innovations, contained in newly developing electronic relationships within government organisations, and between them and their customers and citizens, is being sustained by these visions. The construction of the superhighway takes on a direct significance for governments, therefore, in that it offers opportunities for innovations around their organisations, as well as around their provision of service and their attempts to secure democratic enhancements. These information age visions are translating into a core debate about ICTs and their use in and by government. The delivery of electronic public services and citizenship is, for its universal expression, dependent Upon the development of a high quality, spatially even telecommunications infrastructure, that is an information superhighway. In turn a full-blown electronic superhighway is at least in part contingent upon the presence of strong demand by public agencies for new applications. For the telecommunications operators to invest in their networks on a scale which will accommodate the needs of public service organisations then they have to be assured about return on investment through the development of applications which will yield high revenues, or they have to be compensated for their investments through arrangements for public subsidy. It is an imperative for governments therefore that they are able to show demand tor telecommunications infrastructures and that funding and regulatory arrangements are in train through which those infrastructures can be achieved. A core question concerns whether governments, local, national or supra-national, in seeking fully to exploit ICTs in the production and delivery of their own services and in the enhancement of democratic processes, can secure the presence of appropriate infrastructure in order to do so. Public services have been developed to accomodate 'reach', with provision of services being designed so as to 1998 Številka 3 - leinik IV iipombiuA NFO RM AT IKA STKOKOVNK KAZI'llAVK overcome the problems associated with customers and citizens living at a distance. Historically the structure of government lias clearly reflected lite importance of geography as an organising principle. The recipients of public services, it is assumed, should have access to services regardless of the recipients location, and equally, participation in democratic processes should be unimpeded by locational factors. A key question, however, is whether, as service development and delivery becomes ineluctably intertwined with a new technical infrastructure, the dominant telecommunications paradigm in Europe and the US of 'competition and choice' can deliver these requirements. Can a liberalized telecommunications policy regime, predicated on the competitive development of infrastructures, provide for the access, availability, and raised levels of producer and consumer awareness which are vital lo the realisation of visions of the information age? The debate which is engaged in this article is based upon evidence from the 'telecommunications experiment' which has been occurring in the UK, particularly in the period since privatisation and the introduction of network competition in the mid 1980s. The relevance of the article goes beyond this analysis of rccent history, however, for its themes are of immense relevance to future debates and policy shifts in those eastern European countries which have not yet liberalized their telecommunications provision and for whom their remains a widespread belief in the efficacy of publicly provided service. Electronic Services and Citizenship. Innovation in public services using ICTs and information systems is occurring in a number of ways, some highly visible, and some less so. There are five main types of innovative activity: ■ the commodificaHon of information a electronic transactions ■ the development of electronic services a informatisation processes ■ electronic communications and citizenship The comnwdification of information' is the most commonly found and highly visible example of these sorts of innovations in government service. For example, public access terminals in libraries and other public places, which are used to display information on local services, have become a familiar sight in many countries during the 19Ws. Similarly more and more public service organisations arc using the Internet to provide information on their activities and, as they do so, issues such as access and price become important. In the UK, for example, there is currently a de-hate about whether the proceedings of Parliament should be on the Internet, available in principle to all at low cost, or whether those proceedings should remain in hardcopy form and be sold at comparatively high prices, as at present. Increasingly innovations of this kind are being supplemented by others which allow for interactive applications directed at end consumers, including financial transactions. These innovations might best be described as 'electronic transactions' for their whole form lies in the interactions involved in the service chain from electronic production to delivery and consumption. Tor example, the Vereda project in Spain allows people to interact remotely with a number of public services including renewing and paying for a driving licence. The 'InfoÇal' project in the state of California offers very similar interactivity to Vereda, with facilities for making remote requests for personal documentation such as birth certificates, using a driving licence to verify identity. In Scotland the Lanibdn project, underway in the Highlands and Islands, is designed, for example, to offer a wide variety of applications including online access to museums and library services, and two-way videoconferencing interactions between a central ministry [Social Security) and its clients and claimants. This, in effect, replaces the previous requirement for one side in this relationship to travel to the other. A third form of innovation which is occurring is stronger than the second in that it provides wholly new dimensions to services and falls under the category of 'electronic services'. Thus, whilst the second form of innovation permits existing transactions to occur in electronic form, in this third form of innovation public services are intrinsically augmented. Telemedecine, surveillance systems and educational provision to the home, provide examples of this kind of innovation. In these cases the nature of aspects of health service, protection services, and educational services is being fundamentally redesigned, specifically around the multimedia capabilities of new ICTs. Much less visibly, though no less significantly, public services as diverse as library provision, traffic management and school meals are being profoundly reshaped through 'informatisation processes'. As information systems deliver new capabilities for the gathering, creation and management of new forms of information so that information becomes suffused substantively into the services themselves, as well as into the administrative processes which support them. The new capabilities for librarians to shape their bookstocks and book distribution; the monitoring of traffic movements in towns, permitting real-time responsive traffic management; and experiments in creating more consumer responsiveness in school meals, provide examples of the profound importance of ICTs and systems in the informatisation of government. In this example of innovation government organisations are becoming more informed about the nature of their service delivery, including about the quality of service which they are delivering to their customers and citizens, and are thereby enabled to reshape and improve their services. Additionally, there are applications of ICTs by governments which are aimed explicitly at enhancing com- ii^imi.ikilnformatika 1996 -itevilka3 • lelnik IV SrilOKOVNK KA/I'K.UT. muriications and democratic processes in the state, aimed, that is at (lie realisation (if 'electronic citizenship'. Some of the most challenging of these, such as the City Talks project in the 'digital city' of Amsterdam, arc centred upon attempts to offer more widespread access to citizens into the decision processes of government, through combinations of local cable broadcasting, and interactive facilities at the television set which permit the recording of citizen preference. The issues for governments which flow from these types of Innovation and from these examples are legion. An underlying issue however, which in many senses has the status of sine qua non, concerns the universal availability within the geographical area of governance, of technical infrastructures which will be sufficient, in capacity, quality, geographical availability and cost, for the full exploitation of ICTs and information systems in the relationships between customer, citizen and the state. Information Superhighways One of the most trumpeted aspects of the 'vision thing' in the US is what the American government, with uncharacteristic verbal restraint, has called the National Information Infrastructure. Government in both the UK and Fu-rope has been more inclined to more hyperbolic terms -the superhighway, the infobahn, les autoroutes de 1'information. At the heart of the F.U's proposed superhighways strategy is a "broadband infrastructure as the backbone of the information society". Such an infrastructure development is seen as integral lo the economic ami social health of Eli-rope and, in order to deliver such a backbone and to realise its lull potential, network interconnection and service in ter-oper ability must be assured. Ultimately the US government, the EU and the British government are becoming concerned that the range of applications of ICTs which are potentially available to them should be realisable throughout their territories, though there are different degrees of concern being expressed about issues of equity and efficiency in both infrastructure development and service delivery. For the US Executive there are two related issues. The first of these is that "For electronic scrvicc delivery to occur on a large st ale, nil geographic areas of the iwtipn must have access to athwiiced digital telecommunications services". The second and related issue is that the definition of 'universal service' be revisited "to reflect advancing telecommunications technologies", at least insofar as telephony is concerned. In the first report on superhighways produced for the British government the issues of geographical spread of any superhighway, as well as universal access to it, received only scant attention. However, in their report 'Op- tical Fibre Networks' the Trade & Industry Committee ot the Mouse of Commons came closer to the concern of the US Office of Technology Assessment and the EU with their observation that "Until broadband infrastructure is widely available, many potential services arc unlikely to be developed". The Committee went on to recommend that government policy must recognise "that the networks and services need to be developed together", thereby arguing the case that a virtuous circle, between the technical infrastructure and the services which it conveys, can and should be established and exploited. Infrastructure provision is thus being recognised as an issue amongst politicians and governments, yet perhaps more centrally in the US and the EU than in the UK, In the UK the telecommunications experiment is largely deemed to have succeeded in putting into place enhanced infrastructure, a view which will be questioned throughout I his paper. So how seriously should governments take these questions of infrastructure development? Should the governments rest broadly content that a strategy for telecommunications provision, based around the regulatory stimulation of both "competition and choice' is the best one? Or should governments be broadening the emphasis ot regulation lo embrace explicitly higher order universal service obligation jUSO) than those which presently apply? Universal Service in Telecommunications In keeping with this latter question the UK regulator, OFTEL, is presently investigating the definition ot universal service for telecommunications. Figure I below captures the parameters of this investigation, looking both at existing principles of the universal service obligation [USOj and at the prospects for additions. Figure 1 OFTEL'S GOVERNING PRINCIPLES FOR THE EXISTING USO 1. Access to basic telephony - Unimpeded by location ■ Affordable - Sensitive to special needs 2. Acccss to free public emergency call sen/ices 3. Access to public call boxes OFTEL, 1994 OFTEL'S PROPOSALS FOR ADDITIONS TO THE USO 1, Access to digital telecoms 2, Free services of itemised billing and selective call barring 3. Outgoing calls barred service rather than disconnection 4. "Educational, trai n i n g a n d c ertain other puhiic service organisa-tions should have the right to be connected to affordable ISDN or wideband service levels" OFTEL, 1995 1996- Slevilkaa- letnik IV i if a mih ml NFORMAT IKA STKOKOVNB RAZI'KAVK OFTEL lias argued therefore that three governing principles apply in the existing USO: ■ access to basic telephony, should be available regardless of location ■ access to basic telephony should be affordable ■ access to basic telephony should be sensitive to those with special needs OFTEL goes on to argue that the concept of universal service should be addressed flexibly through time, as technological change, together with changes in lifestyles and consumption patterns, create conditions where higher levels of universal service [ie broadly those requiring higher bandwidth than basic telephony] should come inside the operational definition of USO. At present only basic voice telephony accessed by analogue or digital switches is included in the USO though a second level of sophistication which adds some supplementary services such as itemised billing and call forwarding should be available universally during the next few years, OFTEL has said, OFTEL is presently advocating a significant shift in the USO in the UK, to one which assumes ubiquitous digital infrastructures and therefore embraces itemised billing as standard. Moreover, OFTEL is beginning to rehearse a view of the USO which is stronger still and which bears closely upon public services. OFTEL is asking whether Educational training and certain other public service organisations should have the right to he connected to affordable ISDN or wideband service levels. OFTEL, like the OTA in the US, is raising the core question of the universal presence and availability of high quality, high capacity telecommunications. What OFTEL is only just beginning to address however is the peculiar issue facing public service organisations; that they are uniquely required in many instances to provide 'reach'. Is a higher level of USO [ie higher than basic telephony] essential if public services, with their inherent requirement to reach all parts of the population, are to exploit fully the technologies of tin- information age? Do public service obligations force on to the superhighways agenda consideration of the need for the universal availability of high bandwidth telecommunications which are increasingly necessary for a myriad of multi-media public service applications? Furthermore, if public information services and other provisions are to be increasingly disseminated over the wires with a view to uptake in the home then the issue of universal access to telephony will need to be addressed. In the UK, for example, about 1(1% of homes are currently without telephony, about 3-4% of which are explained by a combination of conscious choice to remain 'unphoned', and friction at reasons |ie people moving between homes]. The remaining 6-7% want telephony but cannot afford it. Only when many of these low income households take up telephone line rental will the UK be at the levels of domes- j 2 "il NfOR MAT IKA lie telephone penetration of the US [94%] and Australia [95%]. This point is given further emphasis from the data in Figure 2 below. Here we see that there is a clear relationship between household income and access to telephony, with penetration rate for the lowest income groups being around 60% for the UK as a whole. FIGURE 2 Telephone Pentration by Gross Weekly Household income, Great Britain [1992] Weekly Household % households with 'phone % without 'phone Income £0 - £50 60 40 £50 - £100 73 27 £100 - £150 84 16 £150 - £200 88 12 £200 - £250 90 10 £250 - £300 91 9 £300 - £350 94 6 £350 - £400 95 5 £400 - £450 96 4 £450 - £500 95 5 £500 + 99 1 Source; (JPCS - General Household Survey, I99Z These UK-wide figures mask considerable differences in regional and local penetration rates for telephony. They also reveal nothing of BT's practice of disconnection for those failing to pay telephone bills on time. There are many small areas in the UK where telephone penetration is well below 50% and moreover the current rate of net disconnections from telephone service runs at 25-30000 per month. Here lies a paradox for public service delivery in the information age. That is that the areas in which the Uptake of telephony is lowest may well be areas where l lie need for consumption of public services is most intensive, and where the benefits which might derive from electronic citizenship might be greatest. Electronic Service Delivery and the Superhighway: Some Evidence from Scotland. In a number of recent studies related both to telecommunications infrastructure provision, and public service development and innovation in Scotland, our findings givr rise to considerable reservations about the adequacy of present telecommunications policy to provide an infrastructure which will serve as a universalis! underpinning for electronically enhanced public services. These findings are, therefore, of pertinence to all countries which are in the process of liberalising their telecommunications provision. 1996 - Stevilka 3 - letnik IV STROKOV!?)! KAZI'luv K The development oi the hard-wired telecommunications infrastructure in Scotland, from which the country's superhighway might derive, is emerging from four sets of sources. Three of these - infrastructure development by the 'old' duopoly providers, BT and Mercury [MCL]; developments emerging from other more recently licensed operators such as Scotland's two clectricily companies; and the laying down of cable by companies franchised and regulated to provide jusuallyl a combination of cable television and local telephony services - have a commercial basis to their operations. The fourth source of telecommunications infrastructure in Scotland has its origins in a unique venture in the UK context, the laying down in the period from 1989 of a digital telecommunications network in the North of the country and across its main northern and western islands. This integrated services digital network {ISDN| is the consequence of a joint venture between BT and the economic and social development agency in this part of Scotland, the Highlands and Islands Enterprise. It is a venture based upon a supply-led and universalis! concept of infrastructure development, a concept at odds with the demand-led nature of mainstream UK telecommunications policy since the early 1980s, and not directly inspired by commercial considerations, therefore. A number of points germane to the debates discussed above emerge from research projects around this plural provision of telecommunications infrastructure in Scotland and elsewhere in the UK: 1. Both BT and MCL, the UK's main telecommunications operators, have built optic fibre networks linking their main switches in Scotland thereby giving each company the basis for effective competition with the other in the main business centres of the country, in particular the main cities of Glasgow, Edinburgh, Dundee arid Aberdeen. There is little fibre elsewhere in the Scottish telecommunications networks. 2. Elsewhere in Scotland [leaving aside the ISDN infrastructure in the north and (he islands] telecommuni- FIGURE 3 TELEPHONE FACILITIES BY TYPE OF EXCHANGE Digital Exchanges Electronic Exchanges Pseudn Digital Exchanges UXDSA UXD5B Itemised Billing Yes Yes Yes Call Barfing Yes Q Yes Yes Call Waiting No No 0 Yes 3 Way Calling No No Q Yes Call Diversion No Q No Q No Call return No No No ISDN No No No Q = Qualified Source: Taylor, 1994 1996 -Številka 3 -letnik IV cations infrastructure provision is uneven. MCI. has scarcely developed its network in Scotland beyond the main centres and BTs network enhancement programme is based largely upon forecast demand rather than universalis* principles. Whilst RT's network in Scotland will be 'modernised' by about the turn of the mi lien in m, that modernisation programme is at present of a quality which will leave much of the country with relatively low-grade 'pseudo-digital' switches which will permit some but not all network telephone services - a point made clear in Figure 3 below. Additionally, that programme will retain in Scotland a predominantly copper wire transmission system whose bandwidth capabilities remain uncertain but which, in the absence of any huge leaps forward in data compression techniques, will not carry the multi-media, interactive applications which the heady visions of the information age are offering up. 3. Successive reorganisations of BT during the 1980's and since 1990 in particular has largely stripped away its public administration legacy of being organised around the geographical principle. Whereas prior to this the presence of powerful local 'barons', in the form of District Chief Executives and, before that. Regional Liirectors, assured the search for geographically defined service equality, the removal of this ' top ocra tic' element in the BT organisational structure leaves the way open for the company to skew investment to places and markets which are deemed of most strategic importance. 4. Fourteen cable franchises have been awarded in Scotland to date, eleven of which are active, though not all of these latter are offering telephony as well as entertainment services. Indeed only seven are offering telephony. Each of the franchise areas is in a heavily populated area, the first six active ones, for example, being in central areas in Glasgow, Edinburgh, Motherwell, Glenrothes, Dundee, and Falkirk, However the technical structure of the cable TV networks, with its reliance on co-axial cable for the 'last drop', bias the network towards capabilities for the distribution of pictures rather than simple telephony on the one hand or fully interactive multimedia services on the other. At present therefore there are significant reasons to raise doubts about the likely contribution of cable infrastructures to the provision of universal high quality infrastructures in Scotland. 5. The electricity companies - Scottish Hydro and Scottish Power - are linked to the UK wide electricity industry telecommunications arm, Energis and boast high quality fibre optic networks running between their main operating centres. As yet these companies have scarcely begun their telecommunications activ- ijfumifjiiiilNFORMATIKA j J STKOKOVXR KAZHIAVK il ics and it is too early to assess their contribution to Scottish provision. The activities in Scotland of other licensed network operators such as British Rail ¡Telecommunications] and British Waterways remain restricted to the laying down of 'dark fibre'. A. Telecommunications competition in Scotland is occurring only in relatively few places, as yet. These are the main centres for business and residential customers. For the rest of the country BT remains de fur to the only viable supplier of services. The purported advantages of telecommunications competition are scarcely in evidence in much of Scotland therefore. 7. Telecommunications awareness amongst potential customers is strongest both where there is competition or where there has been a significant public investment in infrastructure development such as in the Highlands and Islands. In consequence for much of Scotland there are relatively low levels of telecommunications awareness. 8. Public service innovations appear to be occurring most strongly in these areas of the country marked by competitive presence or by public service infrastructure enhancements. Where neither of these conditions exists, then innovation in electronic public services is at its weakest. In consequence for much of Scotland there is a dearth of public sector innovation in electronic services. 9. Telecommunications infrastructure enhancement is further exacerbated through the installation by large companies and other large organisations of their own private networks. By developing their own private networks and meeting their own telecommunications needs largely outwith the public network, organisations are in effect by-passing local public infrastructures and thereby slowing their'exhaustion rate'. This in turn allows the main telecommunications providers, particularly BT, to defer aspects of their modernisation upgrades. Universal Service and Electronic Innovations in the Public Sector. In this final substantive part of this paper we turn to a discussion of the nature and meaning of the concept of universal service and to a preliminary discussion of the relevance of that concept for innovations in the public sector which seek to exploit ICTs. A series of arguments has been taken forward above, which, when taken together, clearly indicate the contemporary relevance and importance of a debate about this core concept in public utility provision, specifically in a telecommunications context. In summary the main arguments to this point have been: ■ two important debates - that on the provision of superhighways, and that on the reinvention of go- ^ ^ i /ponih ml NTO R M AT IKA vernment, - must be interpreted as ineluctably intertwined. ■ Some governments, with the UK government as a good example, appear to be comparatively unconcerned that present approaches to infrastructure development might present significant barriers to the exploitation of the potentialities for 'information age government' which visions of the information society, taken together with the reinvention of government debates, suggest. • our research evidence suggests that telecommunications infrastructure developments in Scotland (and by implication in the UK and elesewhere in liberalised policy regimesj will not produce universal service beyond basic telephony, at least to the medium term. Consequently public service development, and developments in democratic processes which draw upon ICT applications, and which require bandwidth beyond basic telephony, will inevitably be largely frustrated, especially where there is a desire to apply those developments comprehensively around a specific geographical area. These points then provide a backcloth to a discussion ol the concept of universal service provision in this field of telecommunications, and to how such a concept might be advanced in the provision of public services and democracy. If we take the main elements in the USO to be those adduced by OFTF.L, which we brought forward above, then the concern will be to provide access to telecommunications where the users' location and income are broadly irrelevant to that access and where the quality and reliability of the network are guaranteed uniformly across the providers territory. Similarly the costs of Use should be uniform and at a level appropriate to delivering a level of uptake deemed commensurate with universality. A strong view of these elements of the USO would suggest that access to, and use of, telecommunications is accepted as a basic right deriving from citizenship, In some senses the organisational delivery mechanisms of the PTT monopolies may appear as better designed to fulfill this view of telecommunications as a basic right than contemporary policy paradigm based upon competition and choice. Here was an organisational form based on the geographical principle, with powerful units of administration at regional level headed by senior officials likely to take on a topocratic approach to their role, protecting and promoting the interests of customers on their own patch. This was an organisational form which appeared to offer much in the delivery of this strong view of the USO as did a set of arrangements for the implementation of telecommunications based upon equitable provision through subscriber waiting lists to which would-be users were assigned for them to be removed in strict turn. However, the 1996 -Številka 3 -letnik IV S'rftOKOVNË ItUCl'ItAVK waiting lists fur access to this particular superhighway were Jong [particularly in the 1 960s and 1970sf, as more and more households and businesses became would-be subscribers, hi the UK the surge of subscribers during the 1970s is testament to the pent up demand for domestic telephony as the numbers unwed up from 42 % in 1972 to 72 % in 1980. Thus whilst in principle this public service provision offered much in terms of geographical equality, in practice it kept levels of telephone penetration low through a combination of 'demand compression' techniques [notably the waiting list] and through tariff structures which consistently favoured business rather than residential subscribers. In the UK the gradual separation of the Telecommunications and Posts accounts in the post-war period, culminating in full-blown organisational separation in 1981, the development of liberalisation, and then privatisation and competition, marked a process of commercialisation and with it a shift from the public service tradition, It was only at this point, as the system moved from one of public service to one of regulated competition, that the concept of USO was made explicit, "..in the LIK it is only with liberalization thnt the provision of universal service lias been matic both an explicit aim of government regulatory policy in the Telecommunications Act and a specific obligation laid upon BT and Mercury in their licenses". [Garnham, 1988]. At the same time technical change was shifting telecommunications provision from the POTS [Plain Old Telephone Services] era to one of 'pretty amazing new services' (I'ANS], and the admission of additional trading on the public switched network in the form of Value Added Network Services. Moreover, and as we have seen, the possiblities for the comnioditisation of public information; for a move towards more electronic transactions in the public sector; for the electronic delivery of public service; for the value-added potential of informatisation of public services; and for the delivery of electronic citizenship, all equally suggest the case for profound reconsideration of the USO. In combination, all of these changes have brought about a newfound explicit concern with the nature of USO. What then are the key questions about USO in an era when public authorities appear to have much to gain from ICT applications? Some of these questions are: a what are the likely bandwidth requirements for various forms of commoditised information, electronic transactions, electronically enhanced services, and from developments in electronic citizenship? Figures 5, 6 & 7 below cast some light on this question. Figure 5 shows the bandwidth required for different services and clearly shows the rising bandwidth require- ment which accompanies video and multimedia kinds of applications. Figure 6 adds further to the data in Figure 5 by looking at the different transmission times of two examples - colour fax and video-conferencing - on networks of differing bandwidth capability. Figure 7 adds further again to both of these Figures by showing the bandwidth capabilities of different sorts of cable. A critical question therefore for public authorities is to what extent the telecommunications infrastructure in their geographical area of jurisdiction will aliow them to develop and exploit the full range of electronic services. ■ What are the likely reach requirements in each of these service areas? ie what is the necessary point of delivery, the kerbside, the shopping mall, the Town Hall, the police station, the branch library, the school, or the home? ■ how should bandwidth and telecommunications reach be regulated into existence? Figure 4 Bandwidth Requirements of Different Services_____ Information Source Bandwidth Required Digital Telephone/fax Videotex Videoptione Videoconference Video on Demand High definition TV 64kbps 15kbps 64 cr 128 kbps 128 - 960 kbps 2 mbps 140.8 to 560 mbps Source: Adapted from House ot Commons Trade Ä- Industry Select Committee. 1994 FIGURES TRANSMISSION TIMES FOR TELEMATICS APPLICATIONS OF TYPICAL SIZE ON NETWORKS OF DIFFERENT BANDWIDTHS 9.6 Kbps 64kbps 2mbps 20mbps Colour Fax 9 min 1 min 3 sec 0,3 sec Video Conference 3 min 23 sec 0,8 sec 00 FIGURE 6 Bandwidth of Different Sorts of Cable Cable Over 1 km Over 3 km Over 10 km Copper 6 mbps 2 mbps 0.5 mbps Cable TV [Coaxial] 1000 mbps 150 mbps 25 mbps Optical Fibre 10,000 mbps+ 10,000 mbps+ 10,000 mbps+ ■ who should pay for the changes in infrastructure provision which will derive from the answers to some of these questions? In particular, how should the costs of providing bandwidth be apportioned between end 1996 - Slevilka 3 - letnik IV ufjcmibiuil NFOR M ATI KA 15 STLUHtOVNi: KAZJ'KAVE users, telecommunications and other service providers, and public service providers [ie in cases where the latter are not the end user]? ■ in .111 environment of competitive and interconnected infrastructures should the regulatory process include the management of competing telecommunications businesses so as to maintain higher order USO rather than having the USO in effect defined by the lowest common technical denominator? Selected Bibliography Bellamy, C. & Taylor, J. (1992) "Informatisalion and New Public Management: An Alternative Agenda for Public Ad mini st ration "Public Policy and Administration Vol.7 (3) pp.29-41 Bellamy, C. & Taylor, J. |1994| "Introduction: Exploiting IT in Public Administration: Towards the Information Polity", Public Administration, Vol,72, No.l, pp.1-12. Bellamy. C. & Taylor, J. 11994 J "Reinventing Government in the Information Age" Public Money arid Management Vol.14 (3} pp. 5962. CCTA ¡1994] /fj/ormatioi) Superhighways: Opportunities for Public Sector Applications in the UK, London DTI 11994| Creating the Superhighways of the Future: Developing Broadband Communications in the UK, London DTI 11991] Competition and Choice: Telecommunications Policy lor the 1990s, White Paper. London Dll 11990 ] Competition and Choice: Telecommunications Policy for the 1990s, Green Paper, London Doctor. R. D, ¡1994] "Seeking Equity in the National Information In-frastruclure"/riternef Research Vol.4 (3) pp.9-22 8rune I University, Uxb ridge Dutton, W., Taylor, J„ Bellamy, C„ Raab, C. & Peltu. M. [1994] Electronic Service Delivery: Themes and Issues in the Public Sector, RI.C.T, Policy Research Paper No.28, Dutton, W., Blumler, J., Gamham N.p Cornlord J., & Peltu M. [1994] The Information Superhighway: Britain's Response, RI.C.T. Policy Research Paper No. 29, London EU [1994a] Europe and the Global Information Society, Recommendations to the European Council, Brussels EU [1994b| Europe's Way to the Information Society: an Action Plan, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament and to the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions, Brussels EU 11994c 1 Vers une Economic Europeenne Dynamique, Green Paper, Brussels Gans, H. J. |1994] "The Electronic Shut-ins: Some Social Flaws of the Information Superhighway" Medio Studies Journal Vol 8. no 1, ppl23-7 Hadden. S. & Lenert, E. ¡1995) "Telecommunications Networks are not VCRs: the Puhltc Nature of New Information Technologies for Universal Service", Media Culture and Society London, Vol.17 pp.121-140 Hills, J. (19891 "Universal Service: Liberalisation and Privatisation of Telecommunications" Telecommunications Policy June pp. 129144 Information Infrastructure Task Force (IITF) [1993| The National Information Infrastructure: Agenda lor Action, Washington DC Martin, James. [1978], The Wired Society, New Jersey Mueller, M. |1993[ "Universal Service in Telephone History: ARecon-struction" Telecommunications Policy July p 352-369 National Telecommunications and Information Administration [NT1A| 1991 "The NTIA Infrastructure Report: Telecommunications in the Age of Information" NTIA special publication 91-26 Washington DC: US Government Printing Office Nora, S. & Mine, A,, [1980], The Computerisation of Society: a Re port to the President of France, Cambridge, Ma OFTEL [1994a] A Framework for Effective Competition: A Consulta tive Document on (fie Future of Interconnection and Related Issues, London OFTEL [1994b| Households Without a Telephone, London OFTELj 1995a] The Pricing of Telecoms Services from 1997, London. OREL [1995b | Effective Competition: Framework for Action. A state ment on the future of interconnection, competition and related issues, London. OFTEL 11995c] Universal Telecoms Services. Consultative Document on Universal Service in the UK from 1997. London. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECOj 1991 "Universal Service and Rate Restructuring in Telecommunications" Information Computer Communications Policy No23 OECO: Pans Sawhney, H. [1994| "Universal Service: Prosaic Motives and Great Ideals" Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media Fall pp.375-395 Trade and Industry Committee [1994a[. Optical Fibre NetworksJThird Report), July London Trade and Industry Committee, |1994b| Opiical Fibre Networks (Third ReportJ. Volume II, Memorandum of Evidence Taylor, J, 11994], "Telecommunications Infrastructure and Public Policy Development: Evidence and Inference". Iniormatisation and the Public Sector. Vol. 3 No. 1. Taylor, J., Bardzki, B. & Wilson, C. ¡1995] Laying Down the Infrastructure for Innovations in Teledemocracy: the Case of Scotland, in Wvan de Donk, Tops, f? & Snellen, I, Concurring Revolutions: ICT and Democracy. 10S Press Amsterdam. Taylor, J. & Williams, H.[1995] "Superhighways, superlow-ways: Universal Service and Electronic Innovations in the Public Sector. Flu*. The international scientific quarterly on networks and territories, CNRS, Paris. Taylor, J. & Williams, H. 11990] "Themes and Issues in an Information Polity" Journal of information Technology Vol. 5 pp.151-160 Taylor, J. & Williams, H. ¡1991| "Public Administration and the Information Polity" in Public Administration, Vol.69 No.2. pp.171190 U.S. Congress. Office of Technology Assessment, |1993], Making Government Work: Electronic Delivery of Federal Services, Washington D.C. ♦ Dr John Taylor jeprofesorna New Caledonian University vGld^owu, Vd. Britorya, ¿a podroije informatike in managements. npt\mb>uA nfo rm ati ka 1996 Stevilka3 lelnik IV