vi Opera Instituti Archaeologici Sloveniae yi (LAA^ cf/iot^. V dt/Z/fr-iJ r^ n^M^ti" rA^oA- ^ ^UM opAu»^ /u j/. J^jti^l /VVK (pyt^^Ct^^ črvi. ttd*^^ fi-^Ct'^c^'. YAhl /»-t/ A/u^ eOi^nZi^AiA^ doCcU^ trobci ledenodobnega okolja of Ice Age environments UREDIL / EDITED BY BORUT TOŠKAN Zbirka / Series opera instituti archaeologici sloveniae 21 Uredniki zbirke / Editors of the series Jana Horvat, Andrej Pleterski, Anton Velušček Borut Toškan (ur. I ed.) Drobci ledenodobnega okolja. Zbornik ob življenjskem jubileju Ivana Turka Fragments of Ice Age environments. Proceedings in Honour of Ivan Turk's Jubilee Recenzenta i Reviewed by Recenzenti posameznih člankov / Reviewers of single papers Jezikovni pregled / Language Editors Tehnična ureditev / Technical Editor Likovno-grafična zasnova / Graphic art and Oblikovanje ovitka / Front cover design Računalniški prelom / DTP Priprava slikovnega gradiva / Preparation of illustrations Izdala in založila / Published by Zanju / Represented by Glavni urednik / Editor-in-Chief Tisk / Printed by Irena Debeljak, Jana Horvat Brigitta Ammann, Genadij Barišnikov, Hervé Bocherens, Doris Döppes, Florian Fladerer, Franc Janžekovič, Ivan Kos, Boris Kryštufek, Jadranka Mauch Lenardic, Vida Pohar, Dragomir Skaberne Sonja Likar, Alan McConnell-Duff Mateja Belak design Müojka Žalik Huzjan Tamara Korošec Mateja Belak Mateja Belak Inštitut za arheologijo ZRC SAZU, Založba ZRC Oto Luthar, Jana Horvat Vojislav Likar Present d. o. o., Ljubljana Izid knjige sta podprla / Javna agencija za knjigo RS, Znanstvenoraziskovalni center SAZU Published with the support of Slovenian Book Agency, Scientific Research Centre SASA Arhiv Inštituta za arheologijo, Znanstvenoraziskovalni center SAZU Ovitek / Front Cover Archives of the Institute of Archaeology, Scientific research centre SASA CIP - Kataložni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica, Ljubljana 902(497.4):929Turk I.(082) DROBCI ledenodobnega okolja : zbornik ob življenjskem jubileju Ivana Turka = Fragments of Ice Age environments : proceedings in honour of Ivan Turk's jubilee / uredil, edited by Borut Toškan. -Ljubljana : Inštitut za arheologijo ZRC SAZU, Založba ZRC, 2011. - (Opera Instituti Archaeologici Sloveniae ; 21) ISBN 978-961-254-257-3 1. Vzp. stv. nasl. 2. Toškan, Borut 254986496 © 2011, ZRC SAZU, Inštitut za arheologijo, Založba ZRC Vse pravice pridržane. Noben del te knjige ne sme biti reproduciran, shranjen ali prepisan v kateri koli obliki oz. na kateri koli način, bodisi elektronsko, mehansko, s fotokopiranjem, snemanjem ali kako drugače, brez predhodnega pisnega dovoljenja lastnikov avtorskih pravic. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Drobci ledenodobnega okolja Zbornik ob življenjskem jubileju Ivana Turka Fragments of Ice Age environments Proceedings in Honour of Ivan Turk's Jubilee Uredil / Edited by Borut Toškan ZALOŽBA Z R C LJUBLJANA 2011 Ivanu! VSEBINA Spoštovanemu kolegu dr. Ivanu Turku ob jubileju (Anton VELUŠČEK) ....................................................................11 Izbrana bibliografija Ivana Turka (Anton VELUŠČEK) .................................................................................................15 Najdba mastodonta iz Kicarja blizu Ptuja (Vasja MIKUŽ in Jernej PAVŠIČ)..............................................................25 Fosilni in subfosilni ostanki vrste Capra ibex, L. iz najdišča Salzofenhöhle (Zgornja Avstrija) in z vzhodno- alpskega prostora (Martina PACHER) .........................................................................................................................35 Ostanki mamutovega okla iz prodne jame Kamnica pri Drnovem v Krški kotlini (Jernej PAVŠIČ in Vasja MIKUŽ) ............................................................................................................................................................................ 51 Lobanja in postkranialni ostanki mlajšepleistocenskega leva Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) iz jame Sloup na Moravskem krasu (Češka republika) (Cajus G. DIEDRICH)..............................................................................59 Mlajšepleistocenska hijena Crocuta crocuta spelaea (Goldfuss, 1823) iz jame Baranica (jugovzhodna Srbija): tekmovanje za brlog (Vesna DIMITRIJEVIČ) ............................................................................................................69 Spol in velikost krapinskih jamskih medvedov (Preston T. MIRACLE) ......................................................................85 Prehrana, fiziologija in okolje jamskega medveda: biogeokemična raziskava (Aurora GRANDAL-D'ANGLADE, Marta PEREZ-RAMA in Daniel FERNÄNDEZ-MOSQUERA) ...........................................................................111 Statistična analiza metapodijev recentnih rjavih medvedov s poudarkom na razlikah med spoloma (Kerstin ATHEN) .........................................................................................................................................................................127 Biologija današnjega rjavega medveda kot pripomoček za preučevanje jamskega medveda (Duro HUBER in Goran GUŽVICA) ........................................................................................................................................................139 Velike podnebne spremembe razkrite na podlagi malih fosilov. Nekdanje okolje na meji med zgodnjim in srednjim würmom v okolici Divjih bab I (Z Slovenija) (Borut TOŠKAN in Janez DIRJEC) ............................155 Medved in sedimenti v Medvedji jami (Trst, Italija) (Giovanni BOSCHIAN in Annamaria DE SANTIS)..........181 Klimatostratigrafska umestitev sedimentov v zahodnem sektorju Potočke zijalke na podlagi rekonstrukcije snežnih razmer v času njihovega odlaganja (Janez TURK).....................................................................................209 Paleobotanične raziskave v paleolitskih najdiščih v Sloveniji (Metka CULIBERG) .................................................219 Poznoglacialna vegetacija v okolici Blejskega jezera in Gribelj (Bela krajina): primerjava v zadnjem stadialu poledenele in nepoledenele pokrajine (Maja ANDRIČ)..........................................................................................235 Neandertalska piščal iz Divjih bab I: stara in nova spoznanja (Matija TURK in Ljuben DIMKAROSKI) ..........251 O okostju jamskega medveda in lobanji divjega prašiča iz Mokriške jame (Dragan BOŽIČ).................................267 Seznam avtorjev .................................................................................................................................................................. 275 CONTENTS To our dear colleague Dr Ivan Turk on his jubilee (Anton VELUŠČEK).....................................................................11 Selected bibliography of Ivan Turk (Anton VELUŠČEK) ..............................................................................................15 The mastodon find from Kicar near Ptuj (Vasja MIKUŽ and Jernej PAVŠIČ) ............................................................25 Fossil and subfossil remains of Capra ibex, L. from Salzofenhöhle (Upper Austria) and the Eastern Alpine region (Martina PACHER).........................................................................................................................................................35 The mammoth tusk remains from the Kamnica gravel pit near Drnovo in the Krka river basin (Jernej PAVŠIČ and Vasja MIKUŽ) ..........................................................................................................................................................51 Late Pleistocene lion Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) skull and other postcranial remains from the Sloup Cave in the Moravian Karst, Czech Republic (Cajus G. DIEDRICH) .....................................................................59 Late Pleistocene hyaena Crocuta crocuta spelaea (Goldfuss, 1823) from Baranica Cave (southeast Serbia): competition for a den site (Vesna DIMITRIJEVIČ) ..................................................................................................69 Sex and size of the Krapina cave bears (Preston T. MIRACLE).....................................................................................85 Diet, physiology and environment of the cave bear: a biogeochemical study (Aurora GRANDAL-DANGLADE, Marta PEREZ-RAMA and Daniel FERNÄNDEZ-MOSQUERA) ........................................................................111 Statistical analysis on metapodial bones of living brown bears regarding gender differences in males and females (Kerstin ATHEN) ..........................................................................................................................................................127 Recent brown bear biology as a tool to study the cave bear (Duro HUBER and Goran GUŽVICA)....................139 Big climatic changes revealed by tiny fossils. Palaeoenvironment at the boundary between the Early and Middle Würm in the surroundings of Divje babe I (W Slovenia) (Borut TOŠKAN and Janez DIRJEC)......................155 Bears and sediments at Caverna degli Orsi/Medvedja jama (Trieste, Italy) (Giovanni BOSCHIAN and Annamaria DE SANTIS) .............................................................................................................................................181 Climatostratigraphic classification of sediments in the western sector of Potočka zijalka, based on reconstruction of snow conditions at the time of their deposition (Janez TURK) .........................................................................209 Palaeobotanical research at Palaeolithic sites in Slovenia (Metka CULIBERG)........................................................219 Lateglacial vegetation at Lake Bled and Griblje marsh (Slovenia): a comparison of (in Last Glacial Maximum) glaciated and non-glaciated landscapes (Maja ANDRIČ) .......................................................................................235 Neanderthal flute from Divje babe I: old and new findings (Matija TURK and Ljuben DIMKAROSKI) ............251 Cave bear skeleton and wild boar skull from the cave of Mokriška jama (Dragan BOŽIČ) ...................................267 List of contributors.............................................................................................................................................................275 SPOŠTOVANEMU KOLEGU TO OUR DEAR COLLEAGUE DR. IVANU TURKU DR IVAN TURK OB JUBILEJU ON HIS JUBILEE Anton VELUŠČEK Redko kdaj se v življenju raziskovalca zgodi, da dobi priložnost napisati uvodne besede v zbornik, posvečen vrhunskemu znanstveniku ob njegovem življenjskem jubileju. Ker sva bila s slavljencem nekaj časa tudi sodelavca, si to štejem še posebej v zelo veliko čast. Ivan Turk se je rodil v Ljubljani, v težkem obdobju takoj po drugi svetovni vojni. V Ljubljani je končal tudi vse šole na nižjih ravneh, in se sredi šestdesetih let vpisal na enopredmetni študij arheologije ter ga dokončal v roku. Zaradi spleta različnih okoliščin je razmeroma pozno dosegel doktorat. To čast, za katero mu v svoji morda že pretirani skromnosti ni bilo preveč mar, je bolj zaradi kadrovskih potreb kot na lastno željo dosegel šele v zadnjem desetletju minulega tisočletja na Univerzi v Ljubljani. Slavljenec je zanimanje za najstarejše kulture pokazal že med študijem. S prijateljem in kasneje nepogrešljivim sodelavcem Janezom Dirjecem sta navezala stike s pomembnimi raziskovalci stare kamene dobe v Sloveniji in nekdanji skupni državi Jugoslaviji ter tujini. Tako sta aktivno sodelovala pri arheoloških izkopavanjih, ki sta jih vodila prof. dr. Franc Osole in prof. dr. Duro Basler. Pod budnim strokovnim vodstvom prof. Osoleta sta v praksi izvedla tudi vsa tedanja sondiranja (iskanja novih najdišč s pomočjo poskusnih vkopov). Ivan je v ta namen sam pregledal celoten seznam kraških jam v Sloveniji in izbral več vodoravnih jam, v katerih bi po njegovem poizkusne arheološke raziskave dale pozitivne rezultate. Posebej zanimivi sta se mu zdeli dve jami: Matjaževe kamre pri Rovtah in Divje babe pri Cerknem. Zaradi lažjega dostopa so se nato odločili za prvo, a raziskave v drugi so veliko kasneje dale pečat slavljenčevi karieri. Ljudski rek pravi: "Človek obrača, Bog obrne!" Perspektivnega študenta Ivana je po končanem študiju arheologije pot najprej zanesla v matično knjižnico na Filozofski fakulteti, urejanju katere se je posvetil z vsem srcem in delovno vnemo. Z arheologijo, kot sam piše, se takrat ni ukvarjal. Delo v ozadju - dokumentalistika, je bila njegova glavna zadolžitev, tudi ko je nastopil novo službo na Inštitutu za arheologijo pri Slovenski akademiji znanosti in umetnosti, kjer pa je to zahtevno opravilo vedno bolj nadgrajeval s poglabljanjem v arheološko It rarely happens to a researcher be given the chance to write introductory words to proceedings dedicated to a top-level scientist on his birthday jubilee. Ivan and I were co-workers for some time and therefore I consider this a particularly great honour. Ivan Turk was born in Ljubljana, during a difficult period immediately after World War II. He completed elementary and secondary education in Ljubljana. During the mid-sixties, he enrolled in the single-subject study of archaeology in Ljubljana and graduated on time. Due to various circumstances, he obtained his doctorate degree relatively late. Ivan received this honour at the University of Ljubljana as late as the 1990s. Being exceedingly modest, he did not care much about it and earned a PhD more because of staffing needs rather than his own desire. Ivan started showing his interest towards the oldest cultures during his student years. With his friend, and later his vital colleague, Janez Dirjec they made contacts with Palaeolithic researchers from Slovenia and wider. They both played an active role in archaeological excavations, carried out under the supervision of Prof. Dr Franc Osole and Prof. Dr Duro Basler. Under the watchful expert guidance of Prof. Osole they also carried out all the probing (searching for new sites with sample trenching) that was done back then. Ivan examined the complete list of caves in Slovenia for this purpose and selected several horizontal ones, which would be appropriate to explore archaeologically. Two caves were particularly interesting: Matjaževe kamre near Rovte, and Divje babe near Cerkno. For ease of access, the first cave was chosen for excavation. However, research of the latter, which was done many years later, became the highlight of his career. As the popular saying goes: "A doctor administers the cure, but nature heals!" After graduating from archaeology, as a promising student Ivan started his job in the Central Library of the Department of Archaeology at the Faculty of Arts, where his heart and working enthusiasm were devoted to organising the Library. As he himself says, he was not directly involved in archaeology at the time. Doing background work, i.e. documentation work, remained his main task when he started a new job at the Institute of Archaeology of the Slovenian Academy of topografijo, predvsem s sondiranji v jamskih najdiščih, tokrat pod strokovnim vodstvom dr. Mitje Brodarja. V poklicnem obdobju sta z Dirjecem izkopavala v več kot petdesetih jamah v Sloveniji. Med njimi so se nekatere uvrstile na seznam starokamenodobnih najdišč, druge pa so zaradi eminentnih objav postale referenčna najdišča za mlajša obdobja, kot je primer najdišča Podmol pri Kastelcu nad Kraškim robom v jugozahodni Sloveniji. V osemdesetih letih je vodilni inštitutski raziskovalec stare kamene dobe dr. Mitja Brodar odšel v pokoj in na izpraznjeno mesto je bil predlagan Ivan Turk, ki je ponujeno priložnost sprejel kot velik izziv. Leta 1988 je prevzel nase tudi odgovornost vodenja raziskav v jamskem najdišču Divje babe I. Kot piše, jih je pri izkopavanju v jami ves čas spremljala sreča, čeprav so delali v objektivno zelo nevarnih razmerah; kako zelo nevarnih, se je pokazalo v tragični nesreči, ko je na poti v jamo življenje izgubil šolski ravnatelj v pokoju iz Cerknega. Pod Ivanovim vodstvom so raziskave v jami dobile nov zagon. Lotil se jih je sistematično in v marsičem zelo izvirno, predvsem pa na vrhunski ravni. Najprej so ob podpori znancev in darovalcev ter s prostovoljnim delom v dveh letih napeljali 800 m električnega voda, zgradili 400 m dolgo žičnico z višinsko razliko 230 m in v jami postavili železne odre za odvoz odkopanega materiala. Sledilo je več kot desetletje dela na način, ki ga dotlej doma niso imeli priložnosti preizkusiti. Vse nakopane usedline so po žičnici spravili v dolino, jih z vodo sprali na sitih in temeljito pregledali. Kljub številnim tehničnim težavam so vztrajali pri raziskovanju leto za letom, celo tako, da so sami načrtovali in izdelali nov vitel. Natančno delo, ki je bilo sprva spričo redkih najdb paleolitskih orodij videti nesmiselno, se je ob tako pomembnih odkritjih, kot so fosilne dlake jamskega medveda in piščal, bogato obrestovalo. Izdelana je bila kronostratigrafija jamskih sedimentov. Bržčas najpomembnejši in strokovno najzahtevnejši dosežek dolgoletnih raziskav v Divjih babah I. Vsi natančno zbrani podatki za plasti so jim prišli še kako prav. Del kritične svetovne znanosti je predvsem odkritje še vedno domnevne, a iz dneva v dan prepričljivejše piščali, oziroma rečemo lahko najstarejšega pravega glasbila na svetu, sprejel s skepso. Posamezni eminentni raziskovalci, ne zdi se potrebno, da jih imenujem, so se spustili na raven "gostilniškega" obračunavanja z drugačnim in argumenti podprtim razmišljanjem. V osebnih srečanjih z Ivanom je bilo slutiti, da se ob takih napadih, onemogočanjih itd., s kančkom grenkobe sprašuje o dejanskem pomenu znanosti v današnji družbi in njeni zlorabi za kakršen koli namen. Ivan ni bil in tudi danes, pokončen, svež petinšestdesetletnik, ni zamerljiv. Vedno je bil in je tudi še, čeprav danes v zasluženem pokoju, odprt za sodelovanje in pripravljen pomagati. Ivan Turk je s svojim delom pomembno vplival tudi na razvoj slovenske arheologije. Vedno je zago- Sciences and Arts. However, he was constantly upgrading this difficult task with additional research on the archaeo -logical topography, especially with sample trenching of cave sites, this time under the expert guidance of Dr Mitja brodar. During his professional career, Ivan Turk together with Janez Dirjec excavated over fifty caves in Slovenia. Some of them were listed as Palaeolithic sites, while others, such as Podmol near Kastelec in south-western Slovenia, became reference sites for more recent periods, mainly due to their outstanding publications. In the 1980s, the Institute's leading researcher of the Palaeolithic, Dr Mitja Brodar, retired and Ivan Turk was proposed to take his place. He embraced this opportunity as a major challenge. In 1988, the excavation of the cave site of Divje babe I continued under his supervision. As he writes, they were accompanied by good luck during the excavation of the cave, although they worked under objectively dangerous circumstances, as was demonstrated in a tragic accident when a retired headmaster from Cerkno passed away on his way to the cave. Ivan's supervision of the excavation of the cave gave new impetus to the research. He undertook the research systematically and originally in many ways, but what is most important is that the research was conducted at the highest level of expertise. Firstly, with the support of friends, donors and volunteers, an 800-m-long power line, a 400-m-long material ropeway with an altitude difference of 230 m and iron scaffolding in the cave were erected in order to remove the excavated sediments. What followed was more than a decade of research, which was different from any other research previously done at Slovenian sites. All excavated sediments were - using the material ropeway - transported to the valley below the site, where they were wet-sieved and thoroughly examined. Despite several technical difficulties, they carried on with the research year after year, and even designed and made a new winch. Detailed work, which initially - due to few finds of Palaeolithic tools - appeared meaningless, was richly rewarded with such important finds as fossilised cave bear hairs and a bone flute. Chronostratigraphy of cave sediments was established. This is probably the most important and most difficult achievement that resulted from the many years of research at Divje babe I. All carefully collected data from different layers proved to be very useful. Part of the critical world of science was sceptical about the discovery of the still alleged, but from day to day more convincing find of a flute or, as we may say, the oldest music instrument ever discovered. Individual eminent researchers - it does not seem necessary to name them individually - descended to the level of pub squabble, as they did not embrace the importance of looking at things from a new perspective, which was also supported by sound arguments. Personal conversations with Ivan revealed that when varjal interdisciplinarnost v raziskovanju ter se zaradi kadrovskih zmožnosti sam ukvarjal tudi z arheozoo-logijo. Postal je dober poznavalec jamskega medveda (Ursus spelaeus). Zagotovo je bil tudi eden izmed prvih raziskovalcev pri nas, ki je razumel pomen radiometričnih metod datiranja v arheologiji. V Divjih babah I je radiokarbonsko datiranje v sodelovanju z Bonnie Blackwell nadgradil z ESR-datiranjem, ki je za obdobje pred petdeset tisoč leti veliko bolj zanesljivo in natančno. V slovensko arheologijo je torej vpeljeval natančno in interdisciplinarno obravnavanje sedimentov in drugih ostankov, ki nam veliko povedo o nekdanjem okolju, o gospodarstvu takratnega človeka itd. Mokro sejanje, ki ga je izvajal pri raziskovanju Divjih bab I, se je razširilo tudi v preučevanje mlajših arheoloških obdobij, sprva le na Ljubljanskem barju, danes pa je stalnica pri raziskovanju vseh arheoloških najdišč. Slavljenčev velik dosežek je bilo tudi sprotno objavljanje rezultatov posameznih raziskovalnih sezon v Divjih babah I in rezultatov sondiranj po številnih jamah, kar je v slovenski arheologiji, na žalost, bolj izjema kot pravilo. Ivan se je namreč predobro zavedal, da uvajanje novih tehnologij ne koristi, če se rezultati raziskav dobro ne premislijo in se razmišljanje ne objavi ter se tako ne da v presojo najširši strokovni javnosti. Vedno se je zavzemal za znanstveni pristop do dela, kjer sta odliki jasna, razumljiva beseda in preverljivost razlage. Ivan Turk je bil vse svoje poklicno obdobje tudi borec za ohranjanje domače kulturne dediščine. Pri znanstvenih projektih je tako trdno zagovarjal načelo recipročnosti. Tujim raziskovalcem možnosti delovanja v Sloveniji ni odrekal, jim je pa postavljal enake pogoje, kot so veljali za domače arheologe, kar je bilo za nekatere silno moteče. Razumljivo, Ivan je bil trd pogajalec, a vedno sta ga vodili privrženost in ljubezen do arheologije. V tem pogledu se je boril tudi za razvoj in ohranjanje slovenske strokovne besede. Pri nekaj več kot dvomili-jonskem narodu je to nujno potrebno. Še bi lahko naštevali, kaj vse je Ivan prispeval v slovensko in tudi evropsko arheologijo, a posvetimo nekaj besed tudi zborniku, ki je izšel slavljencu v čast in zahvalo, v zahvalo za njegov prispevek k arheologiji, znanstvenemu raziskovanju in tovariškemu odnosu. Zamisel o zborniku je nastala na Inštitutu za arheologijo ZRC SAZU, v domači hiši, kjer je slavljenec dosegel največje poklicne uspehe. Zanje je dobil tudi številne nagrade bodisi matične inštitucije bodisi Slovenskega arheološkega društva. Glavno breme zbornika je prevzel dr. Borut Toškan. Zbral je lepo število domačih in tujih raziskovalcev, ki so pripravili znanstvene prispevke v čast Ivanovi petin-šestdesetletnici. Njihova vsebina vsaj približno odraža področja, s katerimi se je slavljenec večino poklicne kariere bodisi neposredno ukvarjal bodisi so bile predmet njegove znanstvene vedoželjnosti. such "assaults" appeared, he was, with a hint of bitterness, asking himself about the true meaning of science in today's society and its misuse. Ivan was not then, and even today - as a vigorous sixty-five-year-old - is still not resentful. Now, enjoying his well-deserved retirement, he remains - as always - ready to assist and help. Ivan Turk and his researches significantly influenced the development of Slovenian archaeology. He has always supported interdisciplinary research and had the opportunity to engage in archaeozoology himself. He became an expert on the cave bear (Ursus spelaeus). He was most definitely also one of the first Slovenian researchers who understood the importance of radiometric methods of dating in archaeology. The radiocarbon dating of Divje babe I, in collaboration with Bonnie blackwell, was upgraded with far more reliable and precise dating for periods earlier than fifty thousand years ago, called the ESR dating. As mentioned above, he introduced precise and interdisciplinary handling of sediments and other residue, which represent an important source of information about past environments, economy etc. for Slovenian archaeology. Wet sieving, implemented in the exploration of Divje babe I, was later used in researches on later archaeological periods, initially only on the Ljubljansko barje, but is now a routine procedure in the exploration of all archaeological sites. Ivan's great achievement is also the up-to-date publishing of the results of each excavation season at Divje babe I and the results of sample trenching in a number of other caves, which is, unfortunately, more the exception than the rule in Slovenian archaeology. Indeed, Ivan was aware that the introduction of new technologies is of no use if the results are not carefully thought out and published so that they are available for assessment by the wider public. He has always been committed to a scientific approach to work, where the main hallmarks is plain, understandable language and verifiable interpretation. Ivan Turk has always defended preservation of Slovenian cultural heritage. This can clearly be seen from scientific projects, in which he defended the principle of reciprocity. He did not refuse foreign researchers the opportunity to work in Slovenia, but they had to work under conditions that were identical to those applied to local archaeologists, which was greatly annoying to some. Understandably, Ivan was a tough negotiator, but he has always been led by dedication and love towards archaeology. He has therefore also strongly encouraged the development and preservation of Slovenian scientific vocabulary. Considering the population of barely two million, this is indeed necessary. We could continue writing about Ivan's contributions to Slovenian and European archaeology, but we will now devote a few words to this collection of papers, published on his anniversary to honour and acknowledge his contribution to archaeology, scientific research and collaboration with his colleagues. V zahvalo za tvoj prispevek k arheologiji ti, spoštovani slavljenec dr. Ivan Turk, v svojem imenu, v imenu tvojih nekdanjih sodelavcev, vseh slovenskih arheologov, v imenu urednika, avtorjev, prevajalcev, lektorjev in drugih tehničnih sodelavcev zbornika želimo ob jubileju veliko zdravja, življenjske energije, novih odkritij in še na mnoga leta! y Ljubljani, februarja 2011 We came up with an idea of publishing proceedings at the Institute of Archaeology, his second home, where he attained his greatest professional success. He also received numerous awards, from his home institution as well as from the Slovenian Archaeological Society. The editor, Dr Borut Toškan, contacted a good number of local and foreign researchers, which resulted in a collection of papers compiled in honour of Ivan Turk on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday. The content generally reflects areas to which Ivan's career was dedicated, or which have been the subject of his scientific curiosity. To acknowledge your contribution to archaeology, dear Dr Ivan Turk, on behalf of your former colleagues, all Slovenian archaeologists, editor, authors, translators, assistants and other technical staff of this collection of papers and myself, we wish you good health, plenty of life energy, new discoveries and many years to come! Ljubljana, February 2011 (Translation: Nives Kokeza) IZBRANA BIBLIOGRAFIJA IVANA TURKA / SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF IVAN TURK Uredil / Edited by Anton VELUŠČEK 1971 Tatjana Bregant: Ornamentika na neolitski keramiki v Jugoslaviji. Ljubljana 1968. - Argo 10/2/1971, 298. Korošec Paola in Korošec Josip: Najdbe s koliščarskih naselbin pri Igu na Ljubljanskem barju. Arheološki katalogi Slovenije 3, Ljubljana 1969. - Argo 10/2/1971, 300-301. 1977 Neolitik in eneolitik. Ig, v Partih. - Varstvo spomenikov 21/1977, 168-170. Avtorja / Authors: Ciglenečki S. in / and I. Turk. 1979 Gabori Miklos: Les civilisations du paléolithique moyen entre les Alpes et l'Oural. Budapest 1976. - Arheološki vestnik 30/1979, 588. 1980 Poročilo o najdbah favne. - V / In: A. Pleterski, Gradišče pri Goleku - protiturška utrdba s konca 15. stoletja, Zgodovinski časopis 34/3/1980, 296. 1982 Divje babe nad Reko, Slovenija - jamsko paleolitsko najdišče. - Arheološki pregled 23/1982, 12-14. Paleolitik in mezolitik. Plešivica. - Varstvo spomenikov 24/1982, 131. Paleolitik in mezolitik. Plešivica. - Varstvo spomenikov 24/1982, 132. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and D. Vuga. Paleolitik in mezolitik. Reka. - Varstvo spomenikov 24/1982, 133-138. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and J. Dirjec. Neolitik in eneolitik. Blatna Brezovica. - Varstvo spomenikov 24/1982, 139. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and D. Vuga. Neolitik in eneolitik. Jezero. - Varstvo spomenikov 24/1982, 141. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and D. Vuga. Neolitik in eneolitik. Ig. - Varstvo spomenikov 24/1982, 141. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and D. Vuga. Starejša železna doba. Plešivica. - Varstvo spomenikov 24/1982, 153. Prazgodovina - podrobneje neopredeljivo. Gori-čica pod Krimom. - Varstvo spomenikov 24/1982, 160. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and D. Vuga. Pozna rimska doba in preseljevanje ljudstev. Begunje na Gorenjskem. - Varstvo spomenikov 24/1982, 183-184. Negativno. Podvolovljek. - Varstvo spomenikov 24/1982, 214-215. 1983 Inštitut za arheologijo ZRC SAZU Ljubljana. - Geološki zbornik 3/1983, 87-88. Paleolitik in mezolitik. Reka. - Varstvo spomenikov 25/1983, 185-187. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and J. Dirjec. 1984 Zamedvedica pri Plešivici. Novo eneolitsko naselje na Ljubljanskem barju (Zamedvedica bei Plešivica. Eine neue aneolitische Ansiedlung auf dem Moor von Ljubljana (Laibacher Moor)). - Arheološki vestnik 35/1984, 76-89. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and D. Vuga. Janusz K. Kozlowski (ur.): Excavation in the Bacho Kiro Cave (Bulgaria). Warszawa 1982. - Arheološki vestnik 35/1984, 355-361. Plešivica. - Varstvo spomenikov 26/1984, 189-191. Avtorji / Authors: Culiberg, M., I. Turk in / and D. Vuga. Reka. - Varstvo spomenikov 26/1984, 191-193. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and J. Dirjec. Spodnja Bilpa. - Varstvo spomenikov 26/1984, 201-202. Avtorji / Authors: Dirjec, J., G. Hirschback-Merhar in / and I. Turk. Kultura žarnih grobišč. Ločica pri Vranskem. - Varstvo spomenikov 26/1984, 202-203. Avtorja / Authors: Božič, D. in / and I. Turk. Prazgodovina neopredeljivo. Dobrljevo. - Varstvo spomenikov 26/1984, 217. Avtorja / Authors: Ciglenečki, S. in / and I. Turk. Prazgodovina neopredeljivo. Rovišče. - Varstvo spomenikov 26/1984, 220. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and S. Ciglenečki. Prazgodovina neopredeljivo. Police. - Varstvo spomenikov 26/1984, 220-221. Rimska doba. Vransko. - Varstvo spomenikov 26/1984, 264. Rimska doba. Zgornje Gorče. - Varstvo spomenikov 26/1984, 264-265. 1985 Paleolitik in mezolitik. Reka. - Varstvo spomenikov 27/1985, 189-192. Avtorja / Authors: Dirjec, J. in / and I. Turk. Prazgodovina - podrobneje neopredeljivo. Laze. - Varstvo spomenikov 27/1985, 213-214. Avtorja / Authors: Dirjec, J. in / and I. Turk. Prva najdba ledenodobnega leoparda v Sloveniji. -Proteus 48/1/1985, 33-35. Avtorja / Authors: Pavšič, J. in / and I. Turk. Divje babe - pomembno najdišče iz stare kamene dobe na Idrijskem. - Idrijski razgledi 26-28/1981-1983 (1985), 154-156. Arheološka izkopavanja v Divjih babah pri Šebre-ljah. - Primorska srečanja 9/52/1985, 106-107. 1986 Paleolitik in mezolitik. Reka. - Varstvo spomenikov 28/1986, 239-240. Avtorja / Authors: Dirjec, J. in / and I. Turk. Rimska doba. Sežana. - Varstvo spomenikov 28/1986, 272. Avtorja / Authors: Ciglenečki, S. in / and I. Turk. Pozna rimska doba in preseljevanje ljudstev. Do-bravlje. - Varstvo spomenikov 28/1986, 283. Avtorja / Authors: Ciglenečki, S. in / and I. Turk. Arheološka izkopavanja v Divjih babah pri Šebre-ljah. - Idrijski razgledi 29-31/1984-1986, 5-12. 1987 Sandor Bökönyi: Animal husbandry and hunting in Tac-Gorsium. Budapest 1984. - Arheološki vestnik 38/1987, 477-479. Paleolitik in mezolitik. Postojna. - Varstvo spomenikov 29/1987, 232-233. Avtorja / Authors: Dirjec, J. in / and I. Turk. Paleolitik in mezolitik. Reka. - Varstvo spomenikov 29/1987, 233. Avtorja / Authors: Dirjec, J. in / and I. Turk. Prazgodovina - podrobneje neopredeljivo. Gornje Vreme. - Varstvo spomenikov 29/1987, 249. Kratko poročilo o arheoloških izkopavanjih v Divjih babah v letu 1986. - Idrijski razgledi 32/2/1987, 134-136. 1988 Koščeni gumbi iz Divjih bab I. Prispevek k razlagi njihovega nastanka (Die Knochenknöpfe aus den Divje babe I - Beitrag zur Erklärung ihrer Entstehung). -Poročilo o raziskovanju paleolita, neolita in eneolita v Sloveniji 16/1988, 59-63. Fosfati in tanatomasa v sedimentih iz jame Divje babe I (Phosphates and tanatomass in the sediments from the cave Divje babe I). - Acta carsologica 17/1988, 107-127. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., J. Kogovšek, A. Kranjc in / and J. Dirjec. Neolitik in eneolitik. Merče. - Varstvo spomenikov 30/1988, 200. Avtorja / Authors: Saksida, V. in / and I. Turk. Bronasta doba in kultura žarnih grobišč. Liboje. -Varstvo spomenikov 30/1988, 207. Avtorja / Authors: Dirjec, J. in / and I. Turk. Bronasta doba in kultura žarnih grobišč. Raki-tovec. - Varstvo spomenikov 30/1988, 210. Avtorji / Authors: Dirjec, J., A. Šercelj in / and I. Turk. Starejša železna doba. Plešivica. - Varstvo spomenikov 30/1988, 226. Avtorji / Authors: Dirjec, J., F. Leben in / and I. Turk. Prazgodovina - podrobneje neopredeljeno. Merče. - Varstvo spomenikov 30/1988, 228. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and V. Saksida. Pozna rimska doba in preseljevanje ljudstev. Sežana. - Varstvo spomenikov 30/1988, 265. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and V. Saksida. Razmišljanja o bližnjih srečanjih med neander-talcem in jamskim medvedom v Divjih babah (I. del). Našim šebreljskim in reškim gostiteljem. - Idrijski razgledi 33/1/1988, 73-80. Razmišljanja o bližnjih srečanjih med neandertal-cem in jamskim medvedom v Divjih babah. II. Razmišljanja na meji fantastike. - Idrijski razgledi 33/2/1988, 57-62. 1989 Divje babe I - novo paleolitsko najdišče in skupinsko grobišče jamskega medveda. Poskus tafonomske analize na podlagi vzorcev iz dveh sedimentnih in arheoloških kompleksov (Divje babe I - a new palaeolithic site and a common grave of the cave bear. An attempt of a taphonomic analysis based on samples from a pair of sedimentary and cultural units). - Arheološki vestnik 39-40/1988-1989, 13-59. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., J. Dirjec in / and M. Culiberg. Divje babe I - poskus uporabe statistične analize množičnih živalskih ostankov v paleolitski arheologiji. I. Določljivi skeletni ostanki jamskega medveda (Divje babe I - an attempt to apply statistical analysis to the mass animal remains from the palaeolithic site. I. De-terminable skeletal remains of cave bear). - Arheološki vestnik 39-40/1988-1989, 61-94. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and J. Dirjec. Georgia Kourtessi-Philippakis: Le paléolithique de la Grèce continentale. Paris 1986. - Arheološki vestnik 39-40/1988-1989, 639-641. Izotopske metode datiranja nekoč in danes. Temeljne aplikacije v paleolitski arheologiji in kronologiji mlajšega pleistocena (Isotopische Methoden einst und heute. Grundlegende Applikationen in der paläolitschen Archäologie und Chronologie des Jungpleistozäns). -Poročilo o raziskovanju paleolita, neolita in eneolita v Sloveniji 17/1989, 53-60. Prva najdba Pantherapardus (Linné) in nove najdbe vrste Gulo gulo Linné v Sloveniji (First Find of Species Panthera Pardus (Linné) and new Finds of Gulo Gulo Linné in Slovenia). - Razprave 4. razreda SAZU30/1989, 129-159. Avtorja / Authors: Pavšič, J. in / and I. Turk. Stratigraphy of Divje babe I - Results of excavations 1980-1986 (Stratigrafija Divjih bab I - izsledki izkopavanj 1980-1986). - Razprave 4. razreda SAZU 30/5/1989, 161-192. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., J. Dirjec, D. Strmole, A. Kranjc in / and J. Čar. Paleolitik in mezolitik. Liboje. - Varstvo spomenikov 31/1989, 201-202. Avtorji / Authors: Dirjec, J., A. Šercelj in / and I. Turk. Paleolitik in mezolitik. Reka. - Varstvo spomenikov 31/1989, 202. Avtorja / Authors: Dirjec, J. in / and I. Turk. Paleolitik in mezolitik. Stara Fužina. - Varstvo spomenikov 31/1989, 202-203. Avtorji / Authors: Dirjec, J., A. Šercelj in / and I. Turk. Prazgodovina - podrobneje neopredeljeno. Babna gorica. - Varstvo spomenikov 31/1989, 218. Avtorja / Authors: Dirjec, J. in / and I. Turk. Prazgodovina - podrobneje neopredeljeno. Torka. - Varstvo spomenikov 31/1989, 219. Avtorji / Authors: Dirjec, J., A. Šercelj in / and I. Turk. Prazgodovina - podrobneje neopredeljeno. Trnov hrib. - Varstvo spomenikov 31/1989, 219-220. Avtorja / Authors: Dirjec, J. in / and I. Turk. Novejše dobe. Dol. - Varstvo spomenikov 31/1989, 253. Avtorji / Authors: Dirjec, J., J. Pavšič in / and I. Turk. Paleolitsko najdišče Divje babe I v dolini Idrijce. Zatočišče neandertalcev / Palaeolithic site Divje babe I in the Idrijca valley. Shelter of Neanderthals. - (Kulturni in naravni spomeniki Slovenije 170). - Maribor 1989, 72 str. / pages. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., M. Culiberg in / and J. Dirjec. Apnarjeva jama - novo moustériensko najdišče. Poročilo o sondiranju 1987/88. - Celjski zbornik /1989, 7-19. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and J. Dirjec. Najstarejši dokazani obisk Ratitovca. Arheološke najdbe na Zgornjem Povdnu. - Loški razgledi 35/1989, 11-18. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and A. Šercelj. 1990 Divje babe I - poskus uporabe statistične analize množičnih živalskih ostankov v paleolitskih arheologiji. II. Razbite dolge mozgovne kosti jamskega medveda (Divje babe I - an attempt to apply statistical analysis to the mass animal remains in the palaeolithic archaeology. II. Broken - open long marrow bones of cave bear). -Arheološki vestnik 41/1990, 25-42. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., J. Dirjec in / and A. Šmidovnik. Cuon alpinus europaeus Bourguignat (Carnivora, Mammalia) iz mlajšega pleistocena Apnarjeve jame pri Celju (Cuon alpinus europaeus Bourguignant (Carnivora, Mammalia) from the Upper Pleistocene in the Cave Apnarjeva jama at Celje). - Geologija 33/1990, 215-232. Avtorja / Authors: Malez, M. in / and I. Turk. Paleolitik in mezolitik. Reka pri Cerknem. - Varstvo spomenikov 32/1990, 147-148. Avtorji / Authors: Dirjec, J., I. Turk in / and A. Šercelj. Starejša železna doba. Prebold in Griže. - Varstvo spomenikov 32/1990, 158-159. Avtorja / Authors: Dirjec, J. in / and I. Turk. Rdeči ali alpski volk v pleistocenu Slovenije. - Proteus 52/5/1990, 178-180. Avtorja / Authors: Malez, M. in / and I. Turk. Divje babe ob Idrijci. Arheološka izkopavanja. -Delo, leto 32/1990, št. 151 (30. jun.), 28. 1991 Divje babe I - poskus uporabe statistične analize množičnih živalskih ostankov v paleolitski arheologiji. III. Kostni fragmenti (Divje babe I - an attempt to apply statistical analysis to the mass animal remains in the palaeolithic archaeology. III. Bone fragments). - Arheološki vestnik 42/1991, 5-22. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and J. Dirjec. Mirko Malez (1924-1900). - Arheološki vestnik 42/1991, 236-239. Izbrana bibliografija Mirka Maleza (paleolitik). -Arheološki vestnik 42/1991, 237-239. Miklos Kretzoi in Viola T. Dobosi (ur.): Vertes-szölös. Site, man and culture. Budapest 1990. - Arheološki vestnik 42/1991, 241-243. "Krapinski kanibalizem, kult lobanj in pokopi". Primerjalna tafonomska analiza fosilnih ostankov vrste Homo sapiens neanderthalensis iz Krapine (Hrvaška) ("Der Krapiner Kannibalismus, Schädelkult und Be-statungen". Vergleichende tafonomische Analyse der Fossilreste der Art Homo sapiens neanderthalensis aus Krapina (Kroatien)). - Poročilo o raziskovanju paleolita, neolita in eneolita v Sloveniji 19/1991, 131-144. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and J. Dirjec. Opis ostankov favne iz Velikega zjota. - V / In: F. Leben, Veliki zjot, bakreno- in bronastodobno jamsko bivališče v Beli krajini (Veliki zjot, kupfer- und bronzezeitliche Höhlenwohnstäte in der Bela krajina), Poročilo o raziskovanju paleolita, neolita in eneolita v Sloveniji 19/1991, 189. Paleolitik. Lohke (Banjšice). - Varstvo spomenikov 33/1991, 191. Paleolitik. Reka pri Cerknem. - Varstvo spomenikov 33/1991, 191-192. Avtorja / Authors: Dirjec, J. in / and I. Turk. Neolitik in eneolitik. Petrinje. - Varstvo spomenikov 33/1991, 194. Avtorji / Authors: Dirjec, J., I. Turk in / and V. Saksida. Neopredeljeno. Loke (Nova Gorica). - Varstvo spomenikov 33/1991, 230. Avtorja / Authors: Jelinčič, R. in / and I. Turk. Neopredeljeno. Blatna Brezovica. - Varstvo spomenikov 33/1991, 230. Avtorja / Authors: Dirjec, J. in / and I. Turk. Neopredeljeno. Golo Brdo pri Medvodah. - Varstvo spomenikov 33/1991, 230. Avtorja / Authors: Dirjec, J. in / and I. Turk. Ivan Turk, Metka Culiberg in Janez Dirjec: Paleolitsko najdišče Divje babe I v dolini Idrijce - zatočišče neandertalcev. Maribor : Obzorja, 1989, 73 strani, 32 slik. (Kulturni in naravni spomeniki Slovenije 170). -Zgodovinski časopis 45/1/1991, 147-149. Divje babe - novo paleolitsko najdišče v Sloveniji. -Iskra/1991, št. 3 (11. feb.), 14. Naselje: Kastelec. Ime: Podmol. - Varstvo spomenikov 34/1992, 231-232. Avtorja / Authors: Dirjec, J. in / and I. Turk. Naselje: Merče. - Varstvo spomenikov 34, 255. Avtorja / Authors: Saksida, V. in / and I. Turk. Naselje: Praproče. Ime: Jama velikih podkovnja-kov. - Varstvo spomenikov 34/1992, 280-281. Avtorji / Authors: Dirjec, J., I. Turk in / and A. Šercelj. Naselje: Prešnica. Ime: Pod stenico. - Varstvo spomenikov 34/1992, 281-282. Avtorja / Authors: Dirjec, J. in / and I. Turk. Naselje: Reka. Ime: Divje babe I. - Varstvo spomenikov 34/1992, 291. Avtorja / Authors: Dirjec, J. in / and I. Turk. Naselje: Štorje. Ime: Jama Runca. - Varstvo spomenikov 34/1992, 311. Avtorji / Authors: Dirjec, J., V. Saksida in / and I. Turk. Naselje: Zalog pod Trojico. Ime: Boštonova jama. -Varstvo spomenikov 34/1992, 318. Avtorji / Authors: Cevc, T., J. Dirjec in / and I. Turk. Divje babe I. - Idrijski razgledi 37/1-2/1992, 145-146. 1992 Živalski pridatki iz žganih keltsko-rimskih grobov na grobišču Novo mesto - Beletov vrt. Prispevek k poznavanju pogrebnih obredov in navad (Tierknochenfunde und Beigabensitten). - V / In: T. Knez, Novo mesto II, keltsko-rimsko grobišče (Novo mesto II, keltisch-römisches Gräberfeld): Beletov vrt. - (Carniola Archaeologica 2). -Novo mesto 1992, 103-105. Divje babe I - poskus uporabe statistične analize množičnih živalskih ostankov v paleolitski arheologiji. IV. Posamično najdeni zobje jamskega medveda (Divje babe I - an attempt to apply statistical analysis to the mass animal remains in the palaeolithic archaeology. IV. Isolated teeth of cave bear). - Arheološki vestnik 43/1992, 7-22. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., J. Dirjec, I. Debeljak in / and D. Huber. Luu Tran Tieu: Palaeolithic. Pebble Industries in Europe. Budapest 1991. - Arheološki vestnik 43/1992, 211. Acijev spodmol pri Petrinjah, Slovenija. Dr. Francu Lebnu - Aciju za petinšestdesetletnico (Die Höhle Acijev spodmol bei Petrinje, Slowenien). - Poročilo o raziskovanju paleolita, neolita in eneolita v Sloveniji 20/1992, 27-48. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., A. Bavdek, V. Vidrih-Perko, M. Culiberg, A. Šercelj, J. Dirjec in / and P. Pavlin. Naselje: Bač pri Materiji. - Varstvo spomenikov 34/1992, 193. Avtorji / Authors: Dirjec, J., V. Saksida in / and I. Turk. Naselje: Črnotiče. - Varstvo spomenikov 34/1992, 204. Avtorja / Authors: Dirjec, J. in / and I. Turk. Naselje: Golo Brdo. Ime: Maticev spodmol. - Varstvo spomenikov 34/1992, 215. Avtorja / Authors: Dirjec, J. in / and I. Turk. 1993 Uvodna razprava za posodobitev kronologije mlajšega pleistocena v Sloveniji. Starejši in srednji würm (A Prolegomenon to update the chronology of the Upper Pleistocene in Slovenia. Early and Middle Würm). -Arheološki vestnik 44/1993, 29-44. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and T. Verbič. Podmol pri Kastelcu - novo večplastno arheološko najdišče na Krasu, Slovenija (Podmol near Kastelec - A New Multi-layered Archaeological Site on the Karst in Slovenia). - Arheološki vestnik 44/1993, 45-96. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., Z. Modrijan, T. Prus, M. Culiberg, A. Šercelj, V. Vidrih-Perko, J. Dirjec in / and P. Pavlin. 1994 Novo paleolitsko najdišče. Divje babe. - Gea 4/1/1994, 10-11. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and M. Turk. 1995 45.000 let stare fosilne dlake jamskega medveda iz najdišča Divje babe I v Sloveniji / Fossilised cave bear hairs from 45,000 years ago found at Divje babe-I in Slovenia. - Arheološki vestnik 46/1995, 39-51. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., F. Cimerman, J. Dirjec, S. Polak in / and J. Majdič. Ali so v Sloveniji našli najstarejše glasbilo v Evropi / The oldest musical instrument in Europe discovered in Slovenia? - Razprave 4. razreda SAZU 36/12/1995, 287-293. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., J. Dirjec in / and B. Kavur. 1996 Le paléolithique supérieur en Slovénie (19911996). - V / In: M. Otte (ur. / ed.), Union Internationale des Sciences Préhistoriques et Protohistoriques. Commission VIII. Le Paléolithique Supérieur Européen, bilan quinquennal 1991-1996. - (Etudes et Recherches Archéologiques de l'Université de Liège 76). - Liège 1996, 87-89. Lukova jama v dolini Kolpe, v Sloveniji. Novo arheološko in paleontološko najdišče (Lukova Cave in the Kolpa valley, Slovenia. A new archaeological and palaeonotological site). - Arheološki vestnik 47/1996, 41-53. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., A. Velušček, J. Dirjec in / and P. Jamnik. Naselje: Povžane. Ime: Banova jama pri Povža-nah. - Varstvo spomenikov 37, Poročila 1996 (1998), 91-93. Avtorji / Authors: Velušček, A., J. Dirjec, I. Turk, N. Osmuk in / and V. Saksida. Naselje: Sežana. Ime: Pečina pod Medvejkom. -Varstvo spomenikov 37, Poročila 1996 (1998), 103. Avtorji / Authors: Velušček, A., J. Dirjec, I. Turk in / and V. Saksida. The remains of the upper Pleistocene fossils under menace in Slovenia. The case of the cave bear. - ProGeo News 4/1996, 12. Paleolitska koščena piščalka iz Divjih bab I. - Proteus 58/8/1996, 347-350. Nove najdbe in odkritja v Divjih Babah I. - Idrijski razgledi 41/1/1996, 3-8. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and D. Knific-Lunder. Divje babe I. Iskanje novih poti v paleolitski arheologiji Slovenije. - Doktorska naloga / Dissertation, Filozofska fakulteta, Univerza v Ljubljani, 1996. 1997 Moustérienska "koščena piščal" in druge najdbe iz Divjih bab I v Sloveniji / Mousterian "bone flute" and other finds from Divje babe I cave site in Slovenia. -(Opera Instituti Archaeologici Sloveniae 2). - Ljubljana 1997, 223 str. / pages. Urednik / Editor. Predgovor urednika. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 1997, 15-18. Uvod / Introduction. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 1997, 19-23. Stratigrafija in diageneza usedlin / Stratigraphy and diagenesis of sediments. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 1997, 25-39. Analiza usedlin / Analysis of sediments. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 1997, 41-49. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and J. Dirjec. Kronologija / Chronology. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 1997, 67-72. Taksonomski in tafonomski pregled sesalske makrofavne / Taxonomic and taphonomic survey of mammal macrofauna. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 1997, 99-113. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and J. Dirjec. Tafonomija dolgih cevastih kosti okončin jamskega medveda / Taphonomy of limb bones of cave bear. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 1997, 115-118. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and J. Dirjec. Pregled in opis paleolitskih orodij in kurišč / Review and description of palaeolithic tools and hearts. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 1997, 119-156. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and B. Kavur. Opis in razlaga nastanka domnevne koščene pi-ščali / Description and explanation of the origin of the suspected bone flute. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 1997, 157-178. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., J. Dirjec in / and B. Kavur. Izsledki poizkusov izdelave koščene piščali z uporabo kamnitih orodij (Dodatek) / Experimental manufacture of the bone flute with stone tools (Appendix). - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 1997, 176-178. Avtorja / Authors: Bastiani, G. in / and I. Turk. Paleolitske koščene piščali - primerjalno gradivo / Palaeolithic bone flutes - comparable material. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 1997, 179-184. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and B. Kavur. Ob zôri časov I Allalba dei tempi I In der Morgendämmerung der Zeiten I À laube des temps I At the dawn of times. - Ljubljana 1997, 104 str. / pages. Avtorja / Authors: Stele, F. in / and I. Turk. Settlements during the Pleistocene and part of the Holocene. - V / In: A. Kranjc (ur. / ed.), Kras. Slovene classical karst. - Ljubljana 1997, 137-141. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and A. Velušček. L' Image archéologique des Alpes Slovènes. Découverte d'une flûte en os et autres vestiges importants du site paléolithique de Divje Babe I. - V / In: T. Busset, J. Mathieu, D. Mihelič (ur. / eds.), Les Alpes de Slovénie. -(Histoire des Alpes 2). - Zürich 1997, 41-48. Najdba koščene piščali in druga pomembna odkritja na paleolitskem najdišču Divje Babe I. - V / In: O. Luthar, V. Likar (ur. / eds.), Historični seminar II. Glasovi. - Ljubljana 1997, 195-201. Dating a flautist? Using ESR (Electron Spin Resonance) in the Mousterian cave deposits at Divje Babe I, Slovenia. - Geoarchaeology 12/6/1997, 507. Avtorji / Authors: Lau, B., B. A. B. Blackwell, H. P. Schwarcz, I. Turk in / and J. I. Blickstein. A-t-on trouvé en Slovénie le plus vieil instrument de musique d'Europe? - L' Anthropologie 101/1997, 531-540. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., J. Dirjec in / and B. Kavur. Neandertalec in njegova piščal. Po sledeh naših paleolitskih prednikov. - Gea 7/4/1997, 6-10. 1998 Poselitev v arheoloških dobah. - V / In: J. Fridl, D. Kladnik, D. Perko (ur. / eds.), Geografski atlas Slovenije. Država v prostoru in času. - Ljubljana 1998, 282-287. Avtorji / Authors: Ciglenečki, S., J. Dular, J. Horvat, A. Pleterski in / and I. Turk. Stable isotopes and the metabolism of the European cave bear. - Oecologia 116/1998, 177-181. Avtorji / Authors: Nelson, D. E., A. Angerbjorn, K. Eiden in / and I. Turk. Tehnološko in duhovno nerazviti neandertalci. -Tajnica 2/5/1998, 31. 1999 Eedena doba - čas velikih naravnih sprememb. - V / In: B. Aubelj, D. Božič, J. Dular (ur. / eds.), Zakladi tisočletij. Zgodovina Slovenije od neandertalcev do Slovanov. - Ljubljana 1999, 24-27. Vrhunec razvoja lovskih skupnosti. - V / In: B. Aubelj, D. Božič, J. Dular (ur. / eds.), Zakladi tisočletij. Zgodovina Slovenije od neandertalcev do Slovanov. -Ljubljana 1999, 28-31. Slovenija - eno od središč razvoja neandertalcev. - V / In: B. Aubelj, D. Božič, J. Dular (ur. / eds.), Zakladi tisočletij. Zgodovina Slovenije od neandertalcev do Slovanov. - Ljubljana 1999, 32-34. Skrivnostna jama Divje babe I. - V / In: B. Aubelj, D. Božič, J. Dular (ur. / eds.), Zakladi tisočletij. Zgodovina Slovenije od neandertalcev do Slovanov. - Ljubljana 1999, 35-37. Kromanjonci osvojijo naše gore. - V / In: B. Aubelj, D. Božič, J. Dular (ur. / eds.), Zakladi tisočletij. Zgodovina Slovenije od neandertalcev do Slovanov. - Ljubljana 1999, 38-40. Potočka zijalka - zakladnica konic. - V / In: B. Aubelj, D. Božič, J. Dular (ur. / eds.), Zakladi tisočletij. Zgodovina Slovenije od neandertalcev do Slovanov. -Ljubljana 1999, 41-44. Slovensko ozemlje na robu dogajanj. - V / In: B. Aubelj, D. Božič, J. Dular (ur. / eds.), Zakladi tisočletij. Zgodovina Slovenije od neandertalcev do Slovanov. -Ljubljana 1999, 45-47. Zaton lovnega in nabiralnega gospodarstva. - V / In: B. Aubelj, D. Božič, J. Dular (ur. / eds.), Zakladi tisočletij. Zgodovina Slovenije od neandertalcev do Slovanov. - Ljubljana 1999, 48-51. Poselitev na Krasu v pleistocenu in holocenu. - V / In: A. Kranjc (ur. / ed.), Kras. Pokrajina, življenje, ljudje. - Ljubljana 1999, 141. Skrivnostna jama Divje babe I. Zakladi tisočletij. Zgodovina Slovencev od neandertalcev do danes. - Primorske novice leto 53/1999, št. 21 (16. mar.), 10. Svetloba temnih tisočletij. Slovenija - eno od središč razvoja neandertalcev. - Razgledi 6(1133)/1999 (17. III.), 10-11. 2000 Favna. - V / In: S. Ciglenečki, Tinje nad Loko pri Žusmu. Poznoantična in zgodnjesrednjeveška naselbina / Tinje oberhalb von Loka pri Žusmu. Spatantike und frühmittelalterliche Siedlung. - (Opera Instituti Archaeologici Sloveniae 4). - Ljubljana 2000, 167-171. New perspectives on the beginnings of music: archaeological and musicological analysis of a middle Palaeolithic bone "flute". - V / In: N. Wallin, B. Merker, S. Brown (ur. / eds.), The origins of music. - Cambridge 2000, 235-268. Avtorja / Authors: Kunej, D. in / and I. Turk. Poskus ugotavljanja namembnosti kamenih arte-faktov iz najdišča Divje babe I (Slovenija). Domneve o uporabi in obrabi nekaterih musterjenskih orodij (Attempt to establish the purpose of stone artefacts from the Divje babe I site (Slovenia). Hypotheses on the use of and wear to some Mousterian tools). - Arheološki vestnik 51/2000, 13-69. Avtorji / Authors: Bastiani, G., J. Dirjec in / and I. Turk. Divje babe I. - Geološki zbornik 15/2000, 131-133. The Interpleniglacial record in the palaeolithic site of Divje babe I (Slovenia): some of the more important results of the 1980-1999 excavations. - Societä per la Preistoria e Protostoria della Regione Friuli-Venezia Giulia. Quaderno 8/2000, 221-244. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and G. Bastiani. 2001 Mednarodna konferenca na temo "Vprašanje musterjenske koščene piščali iz najdišča Divje babe I (Slovenija)" (Spodnja Idrija, Kendov dvorec, 7.-11. maj 1998). Predgovor. - Arheološki vestnik 52/2001, 9-10. Nove analize "piščali" iz Divjih bab I (Slovenija) / New analyses of the "flute" from Divje babe I (Slovenia). - Arheološki vestnik 52/2001, 25-79. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., J. Dirjec, G. Bastiani, M. Pflaum, T. Lauko, F. Cimerman, F. Kosel, J. Grum in / and P. Cevc. Morfometrična in kronostratigrafska analiza ter paleoklimatska razlaga jamskih sedimentov v Divjih babah I, Slovenija (Morphometric and chronostratigraphic sedimentary analyses and palaeoclimatic interpretations for the profile at Divje babe I, Slovenia). - Arheološki vestnik 52/2001, 221-247. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., D. Skaberne, B. A. B. Blackwell in / and J. Dirjec. Županov spodmol, Arheologija. - V / In: Enciklopedija Slovenije 15, Wi-Ž. - Ljubljana 2001, 387-388. 2002 Morfometrična analiza zgodnjih koščenih konic v povezavi z najdbami koščenih konic iz Divjih bab I (Morphometric analysis of early bone points in connection with finds of bone points from Divje babe I). -Arheološki vestnik 53/2002, 9-29. Winfried Henke, Nina Kieser in Wolfgang Schnaubelt: Die Neandertalerin. Botschafterin der Vorzeit. Gelsenkirchen, Schwelm 1996. - Arheološki vestnik 53/2002, 407. Ocena vlage v mlajšepleistocenskem kraškem okolju. Paleoklima in paleomikrookolje v jami Divje babe I, Slovenija /Assessing humidity in an upper Pleistocene karst environment. Palaeoclimates and palaeomicroe-nvironments at the cave Divje babe I, Slovenia. - Acta carsologica 31/2/2002, 139-175. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., D. Skaberne, B. A. B. Blackwell in / and J. Dirjec. Analysis of the content of hearths from the Mousterian site Divje babe I (Slovenia). Scales and dermal plates of lower vertebrates, charcoal and fossilized wood (Analiza vsebine ognjišč musterjenskega najdišča Divje babe I (Slovenija). Luske in kožne ploščice nižjih vretenčarjev, oglje in fosiliziran les). - Razprave 4. razreda SAZU 43/2/2002, 203-218. Avtorji / Authors: Paunovic, M., M. Culiberg in / and I. Turk. Divje babe I. - V / In: Enciklopedija Slovenije 16, Dodatek A-Ž. - Ljubljana 2002, 42. 2003 Humans and carnivores in Slovenia during the upper Pleistocene. Interactions between Neanderthals and the cave bear. - V / In: B. Kryštufek, B. Flajšman, H. I. Griffiths (ur. / eds.), Living with bears. A large European carnivore in a shrinking world. - Ljubljana 2003, 43-57. Kako bolje izkoristiti arheološko metodo izkopavanja v kasnejši analizi in razlagi izsledkov. Izkušnje izkopavanj v Divjih babah I, Slovenija / How to make better use of archaeological methods of excavation in post-excavation analysis and interpretation of the results. Experiences of excavations at Divje babe I, Slovenia. - Arheološki vestnik 54/2003, 9-30. Zanesljivost datacij z uranovim nizom v Divjih babah I. Vpliv sedimentacijskih vrzeli na koncentracije urana v sedimentih in na datacije uranovega niza / Reliability of Uranium Series Dating in Divje babe I. Effect of sedimentation gaps on uranium concentrations in sediments and on uranium series dating. - Arheološki vestnik 54/2003, 31-44. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., D. Skaberne in / and Ž. Šmit. Domnevna musterjenska piščal iz Divjih bab I: psevdoartefakt ali prava piščal ali kdo je naredil luknje / Putative Mousterian flute from Divje babe I (Slovenia): pseudoartefact or true flute, or who made the holes. -Arheološki vestnik 54/2003, 67-72. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., G. Bastiani, B. A. B. Blackwell in / and F. Z. Horusitzky. 2004 Viktorjev spodmol in Mala Triglavca. Prispevki k poznavanju mezolitskega obdobja v Sloveniji / Viktorjev spodmol and Mala Triglavca. Contributions to understanding the Mesolithic period in Slovenia. - (Opera Instituti Archaeologici Sloveniae 9). - Ljubljana 2004, 247 str. / pages. Urednik / Editor. Uvod / Introduction. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2004, 13-14. Kratka zgodovina raziskav mezolitika v Sloveniji / Brief history of research of the Mesolithic in Slovenia. -V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2004, 15-20. Topografija Viktorjevega spodmola / Topography of Viktorjev spodmol). - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2004, 21-23. Metodologija arheološkega dela / Methodology of the archaeological work. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2004, 24-26. Stratigrafija in sedimentologija Viktorjevega spod-mola / Stratigraphy and sedimentology of Viktorjev spodmol. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2004, 27-31. Različne arheološke metode - različni rezultati pri raziskavah Viktorjevega spodmola / Different archaeological methods - different results in ivestigations of Viktorjev spodmol. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2004, 32-52. Razlaga orodnih tipov in armatur ter postopkov pri izdelavi orodij in armatur, najdenih v Viktorjevem spodmolu / Interpretation of types of tool and armature and technology of production of tools and armatures found in Viktorjev spodmol. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2004, 53-61. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and M. Turk. Primerjave mezolitskih najdb v Viktorjevem spodmolu z izbranimi najdišči / Comparisons of Mesolithic finds in Viktorjev spodmol with selected sites. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2004, 62-71. Opredelitev najdb iz Viktorjevega spodmola / Classification of Viktorjev spodmol. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2004, 72-81. Vprašanje izvora in nadaljevanja mezolitika / The question of origin and continuation of the Slovene Mesolithic. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2004, 82-86. Najdbe keramike / Finds of pottery. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2004, 87. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and A. Velušček. Človeški ostanki v Viktorjevem spodmolu / Human remains in Viktorjev spodmol. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2004, 168. Avtorja / Authors: Štamfelj, I. in / and I. Turk. Namesto sklepa / Instead of conclusion. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2004, 169. Uvod / Introduction. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2004, 173-175. Arheološke najdbe / Archaeological finds. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2004, 176-196. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, M. in / and I. Turk. Malakofavna / Malacofauna. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2004, 197-199. Avtorja / Authors: Mikuž, V. in / and I. Turk. Ostanki ektotermnih vretenčarjev / Remains of ectothermic vertebrates. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2004, 200. Sesalska favna / Mammalian fauna. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2004, 201-203. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., B. Toškan in / and J. Dirjec. Sklep / Conclusion. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2004, 205-210. 14C datacije Viktorjevega spodmola in Male Triglavce / 14C dating of Viktorjev spodmol and Mala Triglavca. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2004, 243-247. Nekaj osnovnih podatkov o paleolitskem najdišču Divje babe I in njegova problematika s poudarkom na najdbi domnevne piščali. - Zgodovina v šoli 13/12/2004, 3-11. 2005 Rezultati računalniške tomografije najstarejše domnevne piščali iz Divjih bab I (Slovenija): prispevek k teoriji luknjanja kosti / Results of computer tomography of the oldest suspected flute from Divje babe I (Slovenia): contribution to the theory of making holes in bones.-Arheološki vestnik 56/2005, 9-36. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., M. Pflaum in / and D. Pekarovič. Zagovor morfometrične analize koščenih konic / In defence of morphometric analysis of bone points. -Arheološki vestnik 56/2005, 453-464. Poselitev in raba zakraselega sveta zahodne Slovenije v preteklosti. Uvod / Settlement and land usage of the Karstic world in western Slovenia in the past. Introduction. - V / In: A. Mihevc (ur. / ed.), Kras. Voda in življenje v kamniti pokrajini / Kras. Water and life in a rocky landscape. - Ljubljana 2005, 167-172. Avtorji / Authors: Horvat, J., Z. Modrijan, P. Svoljšak, I. Turk in / and A. Velušček. Ocena vlage v mlajšepleistocenskem kraškem okolju. Paleoklima in paleomikrookolje v jami Divje babe I, Slovenija / Assessing humidity in the upper Pleistocene karst environment. Palaeoclimates and palaeomicro-environments at the Divje babe I, Slovenia. - V / In: A. Mihevc (ur. / ed.), Kras. Voda in življenje v kamniti pokrajini / Kras. Water and life in a rocky landscape. -Ljubljana 2005, 173-198. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., D. Skaberne, B. A. B. Blackwell in / and J. Dirjec. 2006 Prispevek Divjih bab I (Slovenija) h kronologiji mlajšega pleistocena med alpskim in dinarskim svetom / Contribution of Divje babe I (Slovenia) to the chronology of the Late Pleistocene between the Alps and the Dinarids. - Arheološki vestnik 57/2006, 9-68. Résultats de l'analyse tomographique informatisée de la plus ancienne flûte découverte à Divje babé I (Slovénie) et sa position chronologique dans le contexte des changements paléoclimatiques et paléoenvironnementaux au cours du dernier glaciaire (Results of computer tomography of the oldest suspected flute from Divje babé I (Slovenia) and its chronological position within global palaeoclimatic and palaeoenvironmental change during Last Glacial). - L' Anthropologie 110/2006, 293-317. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., B. A. B. Blackwell, J. Turk in / and M. Pflaum. 2007 Divje babe I. Paleolitsko najdišče mlajšega pleistocena v Sloveniji. 1. del: Geologija in paleontologija / Divje babe I. Upper Pleistocene palaeolithic site in Slovenia. Part 1: Geology and Palaeontology. - (Opera Instituti Archaeologici Sloveniae 13). - Ljubljana 2007, 478 str. / pages. Urednik / Editor. Uvod / Introduction. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2007, 13-23. Izhodišča, tehnika in metoda dela pri raziskovanju najdišča Divje babe I / Introduction to techniques and methods of work in studying the Divje babe I site. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2007, 25-38. Pleistocenski sedimenti na Šebreljski planoti nad najdiščem Divje babe I / Pleistocene sediments on Še-brelje plateau above the site of Divje babe I. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2007, 45-49. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and J. Turk. Stratigrafija najdišča Divje babe I / Stratigraphy of the Divje babe I site. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2007, 51-61. Sedimenti v najdišču Divje babe I / Sediments at the Divje babe I site. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2007, 63-121. Avtorji / Authors: Turk, I., D. Skaberne, B. Orel, J. Turk, A. Kranjc, L. Slemenik-Perše in / and A. Meden. ESR-datiranje najdišča Divje babe I, Slovenija / ESR Dating at the Divje babe I, Slovenia. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2007, 123-157. Avtorji / Authors: Blackwell, B. A. B., E. S. K. Yu, A. R. Skinner, I. Turk, J. I. B. Blickstein, J. Turk, V. S. W. Yin in / and B. Lau. Kronologija najdišča Divje babe I / Chronology of the Divje babe I. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2007, 159-165. Jamski medved v najdišču Divje babe I: tafonom-sko-stratigrafska analiza / Cave bear at the Divje babe I site: taphonomic-stratigraphics analysis. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2007, 279-339. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and J. Dirjec. Fosilne dlake jamskega medveda v najdišču Divje babe I / Fossil hairs of cave bear at the Divje babe I site. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2007, 341-346. Avtorja / Authors: Turk, I. in / and G. Kapun. Stabilni izotopi in metabolizem jamskega medveda iz najdišča Divje babe I / Stable isotopes and the metabolism of cave bear from Divje babe I. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2007, 347-355. Avtorji / Authors: Nelson, E., A. Angerbjorn, K. Liden in / and I. Turk. Velike dolge kosti jamskega medveda iz najdišča Divje babe I / Large long bones of cave bear from Divje babe I site. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2007, 369-384. Avtorja / Authors: Jambrešic, G. in / and I. Turk. Sklep / Conclusion. - V / In: I. Turk (ur. / ed.) 2007, 435-458. Martina Pacher, Vida Pohar in Gemot Rabeder (ur.): Potočka zijalka. Palaeontological and Archaeological Results of the Campaigns 1997-2000. Wien 2004. - Arheološki vestnik 58/2007, 453-455. 2008 The oldest flute. - Speleophilately International 82/2008, 5. 2009 Dating and paleoenvironmental interpretation of the Late Pleistocene archaeological deposits at Divje Babe I, Slovenia. - V / In: M. Camps, C. Szmidt (ur. / eds.), The Mediterranean from 50 000 to 25 000 BP: turning points and new directions. - Oxford 2009, 179-210. Avtorji / Authors: Blackwell, B. A. B., E. S. K. Yu, A. R. Skinner, I. Turk, J. I. B. Blickstein, D. Skaberne, J. Turk in / and B. Lau. NAJDBA mastodonta iz kicarja blizu ptuja THE mastodon fiND from kicar near ptuj Vasja mikuž, Jernej PAVŠiČ Izvleček V prispevku so obravnavani ostanki mastodontovega okla vrste Anancus arvernensis (croizet et Jobert, 1828), ki so bili v letu 1997 najdeni v starejših villafranchijskih klastitih na širšem območju Kicarja blizu Ptuja. V tem delu slovenije je že registriranih več ostankov omenjene vrste trobčarja. Ključne besede: okel, mastodont, starejši villafranchij, Kicar pri Ptuju Abstract This contribution deals with the remains of a mastodon tusk from the species Anancus arvernensis (croizet et Jobert, 1828). The remains were discovered in 1997 in the Early Villafranchian clastites in the broader area of Kicar near Ptuj. so far quite a few mastodon remains have been registered in this part of slovenia. Keywords: tusk, mastodon, Early Villafranchian, Kicar near Ptuj uvod Po podatkih Franca Goloba s Ptuja sta bila dela okla najdena 5. aprila 1997 v konglomeratu ob gozdni cesti na širšem območju Kicarja, dobrih pet kilometrov severnovzhodno od Ptuja, nekako med krajema spodnji Velovlek na severu in Podvinci na jugu. Dne 21. julija 2004 nam je gospa Katarina Krivic, kustodinja Prirodoslovnega muzeja slovenije, prinesla sliko najdišča in manjši ostanek ohranjenega okla v silikatnem konglomeratu. Večji ostanek okla istega primerka, dolg okrog 25 cm in s premerom od 10 do 12 cm, smo prejeli nekoliko kasneje. Ker pravega najdišča nismo poznali, smo novembra 2008 znova prosili najditelja, da nam na karto vriše točno lokacijo najdenih delov trobčarjevega okla. Dne 20. novembra 2008 nam je najditelj poslal nove fotografije najdišča in označeno mesto na topografski karti v merilu 1:25.000. Izkazalo se je, da okel ne izvira iz severnega dela Kicarja, temveč z zahodnega roba introduction According to the data passed on by franc Golob from Ptuj the two parts of the tusk were found on 5th april 1997 in a conglomerate alongside a forest route in the broader area of Kicar, just over five kilometres to the northeast of Ptuj, somewhere between spodnji Velovlek in the north and Podvinci on the south. Qn 21st July 2004, Mrs. Katarina Krivic, the custodian of the Slovenian Museum of Natural History brought a picture of the site and a smaller remain of the preserved tusk in silicate conglomerate. somewhat later we received the larger remain (approximately 25 cm long and with a diameter measuring between 10 and 12 cm) of the tusk belonging to the same specimen. As we did not know the exact location of the finds, we asked the finder to draw the precise location of the discovered parts of the Proboscidea tusk onto a map (in November 2008). Qn 20th November 2008 he sent us new photographs of the site and marked the spot Sl. 1: Geografski položaj najdišča okla na območju Kicarja. Fig. 1: Geographical position of the tusk site on the Kicar territory. on a topographic map at a scale 1:25,000. This showed us that the tusk did not originate from the northern part of Kicar, but from the south-western part, around 700 m east of the hamlet Žabjak (that lies 229.1 m a.s.l.) and approximately 600 m northwest from the hamlet Podvinci (Fig. 1). Parts of the tusk were dug out from the layer of the closely held together conglomerate (that includes sandstone particles) which came from the river. According to the data given by F. Golob the find originates from the sand conglomerate wall, approximately 6 to 8 m above the plain of Žabjak, i.e. at an altitude of approximately 236 m. The cliff rises approximately 15 m above the location of the find, and the last two metres to the top of the wall are formed by a layer of poorly stuck together sandstone. The tusk remains are currently located at the Department of Geology, Faculty of natural sciences and engineering, University of Ljubljana, Privoz 11. We plan to pass them on to the geological and Palaeontological collection at the Slovenian Museum of Natural History. južnega dela, okrog 700 m vzhodno od zaselka Žabjak, ki leži na nadmorski višini 229,1 m in približno 600 m severnozahodno od zaselka Podvinci (sl. 1). Deli okla so bili izkopani neposredno iz profila trdno sprijetega konglomerata z vmesnimi lečastimi vložki peščenjaka, ki so rečnega porekla. Po podatkih F. Goloba najdba izvira iz peščeno konglomeratne stene, kakšnih 6 do 8 m nad ravnino Žabjaka, tj. na nadmorski višini okrog 236 m. Pečina se dviga še okrog 15 m nad mestom najdbe, zadnja dva metra pod vrhom stene je plast slabo sprijetega rumenkastega peščenjaka. Ostanki okla so trenutno na ljubljanskem Oddelku za geologijo Naravoslovnotehniške fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani, Privoz 11. Kasneje jih nameravamo posredovati geološko-paleontološki zbirki Prirodoslovnega muzeja Slovenije. GEOLOŠKA ZGRADBA KICARJA IN OKOLICE Po podatkih Žnidarčiča in Mioča (1988) na Osnovni geološki karti SFRJ, lista Maribor in Leibnitz v merilu 1:100.000, izdanjajo na območju najdišča Kicar pliocenske kamnine: pesek, prod, konglomerat in peščenjak z vložki gline. Na obrobju vodoravno ležečih pliocenskih in pliokvartarnih plasti so v nižinskem delu v okolici Kicarja kvartarne usedline: peščena glina in soliflukcij-ski deluvijalno-proluvijalni material. Vse kaže, da je bil del trobčarjevega okla najden v pliocenskih usedlinah. Prodniki v konglomeratu so zelo različnih velikosti in iz različnih metamorfnih kamnin ter kremena. Žnidarčič in Mioč (1989, 29 s) pišeta, da ležijo pliocenske plasti v okolici Ptuja superpozicijsko na sarmatijskih in panonijskih skladih. Starost pliocenskih THE GEOLOGY STRATA OF KICAR AND ITS SURROUNDINGS According to the data provided by Znidarcic and Mioc (1988) on the Basic geological map of SFRJ, sheet Maribor and Leibnitz (scale 1:100,000), the following Pliocene rocks can be found in the Kicar area: sand, gravel, conglomerate and sandstone with clay inserts. On the area covered by the horizontally lying Pliocene and Plio-Quaternary layers, the following Quaternary sediments can be found in the lowland area in the vicinity of Kicar: sand clay and solifluctional, deluvial-proluvial material. All of this indicates that the part of the Proboscidea tusk was found in the Pliocene sediments. The pebbles found in the conglomerate are of various sizes and from various metamorphic rocks and quartz. Znidarcic and Mioc (1989, 29 f) wrote that the Pliocene layers in the vicinity of Ptuj lie on top of Sar-matian and Pannonian bases. The age of the Pliocene layers was established with the aid of the ostracoda found in the clay layers. There are no mentions of mammalian remains discovered in Pliocene or Plio-Quaternary layers. According to these two authors Kicar and its surroundings belong to the Pesnica tectonic trench, or to the tectonic unit of Slovenske gorice. THE RESEARCH INTO MASTODONS IN SLOVENIA SO FAR Numerous researchers have written about Mastodon remains in Slovenia: Rakovec (1954; 1968; 1997), Pohar (1963-1964), Drobne (1967; 1983), Brezigar (1997), Po- plasti je določena s pomočjo ostrakodov, najdenih v glinenih plasteh. Iz pliocenskih skladov ne omenjata nobenih ostankov sesalcev. Tudi iz pliokvartarnih skladov ne omenjata nikakršnih najdb takratnih sesalcev. Po podatkih istih avtorjev sodi Kicar z okolico k Pesniškemu tektonskemu jarku oziroma k tektonski enoti slovenskih goric. DOSEDANJE RAZISKAVE MASTODONTOV V SLOVENIJI o ostankih mastodontov na Slovenskem so pisali številni raziskovalci: Rakovec (1954; 1968; 1997), Pohar (1963-1964), Drobne (1967; 1983), Brezigar (1997), Pohar, et al. (1997), Lenardič, Pohar (1997), Mikuž (1998) in drugi. V severnovzhodni Sloveniji so najdbe trobčarjev ali proboscidov redke, v primerjavi z drugimi slovenskimi območji pa razmeroma pogostne. Največ je ostankov mastodontov (Mastodontoidea), kar je razvidno iz podatkov Lenardičeve in Poharjeve (1997). Po stopnji specializacije mastodontskih molarjev sta jih isti avtorici (1997) starostno uvrstili v zgornji pliocen. Tudi v širši okolici Ptuja je bilo že najdenih nekaj ostankov mastodontov. Lenardičeva in Poharjeva (1997, 107) omenjata najdbe anankusa iz najdišč v okolici Ljutomera, sv. Andraža in Vitomarcev ter Lahoncev. Mikuž (1998) opisuje iz okolice Ptuja del tretjega spodnjega levega meljaka (M3) trobčarja plio-pleistocenske vrste Anancus arvernensis (Croizet et Jobert, 1828). Predvideva, da je bil ostanek molarja najden v kamninah villafranchijske starosti (1998, 130). Isti avtor (2007) je tukaj obravnavano najdbo iz Kicarja sprva pomotoma pripisal mamutu. Do neljube pomote je prišlo zato, ker nismo poznali pravega najdišča. Prepričani smo bili, da najdba izvira iz pleistocenskih prodnatih nanosov, ki so v bolj ravninskem delu. Izkazalo pa se je, da izvira iz starejših pliocenskih kamnin z obrobnega območja južnozahodnega dela Kicarja, ki so nad mlajšimi ravninskimi deli. PALEONTOLOŠKI DEL Sistematika po: R. Vaufreyju, 1958 Razred Mammalia Linné, 1758 Red Proboscidea Illiger, 1811 Podred Mastodontoidea Osborn, 1921 Družina Tetralophodontidae Vaufrey, 1958 Poddružina Anancinae Hay, 1922 Rod Anancus Aymard, 1855. Thenius (1969) ima nekoliko drugačno sistematiko trobčarjev (Proboscidea). Anankuse oziroma rod Anancus uvršča k skupini Elephantoidea in nadalje k manjši skupini Mastodontidae. Iz podatkov navedenega avtorja bar et al. (1997), Lenardič, Pohar (1997), Mikuž (1998) and others. Proboscidea finds are rare in northeast Slovenia, however they are relatively common when compared to other parts of Slovenia. The most common are mastodon (Mastodontoidea) remains, and this can be clearly seen in the data provided by Lenardič and Pohar (1997). Judging by the specialisation level of the mastodon's molars the mentioned authoresses (1997) placed them into Late Pliocene. So far several mastodon finds have been discovered in the broader surroundings of Ptuj. They (1997, 107) mentioned Anancus finds discovered at sites in the vicinity of Ljutomer, Sv. Andraž, Vitomarci and Lahonci. Mikuž (1998) described a part of the third lower left molar (Mj) of a Proboscidea belonging to the Pliocene-Pleistocene species Anancus arvernensis (Croizet et Jobert, 1828) that was discovered in the Ptuj surroundings; he (Mikuž 1998, 130) assumed that the molar remain found in the rocks belonged to the Villafranchian period. The same author (Mikuž 2007) also initially wrongfully ascribed the here presented find from Kicar as a mammoth find. The mistake was a result of not knowing the precise location of the site. We were convinced that the find originated from the Pleistocene gravel deposits that can mainly be found in the plain. However, it has been discovered that the find came from the older Pliocene rocks on the southwest edge of Kicar, located on top of the earlier plain parts. PALAEONTOLOGICAL PART classification according to: R. Vaufrey (1958) Class Mammalia Linné, 1758 Order Proboscidea Illiger, 1811 Suborder Mastodontoidea Osborn, 1921 Family Tetralophodontidae Vaufrey, 1958 Subfamily Anancinae Hay, 1922 Genus Anancus Aymard, 1855 Thenius (1969) classifies Proboscidea in a slightly different way. He places the genus Anancus into the group Elephantoidea and further into the smaller group Mastodontidae. According to Thenius (1969, 601) the species Anancus arvernensis is characteristic merely for the late Pliocene and early Pleistocene. Thenius (1969, 604, Fig. 697) compares various mastodon genera amongst each other. The picture shows that the species Anancus arvernensis had relatively straight and extremely long tusks and that they could be found only in the upper jaw. A reduction of this incisor took place in the lower jaw. There are a number of more up to date Proboscidea classifications that do not differ greatly one from another. We will take this opportunity to state newer data as regards the classification of Proboscidea. According to (Thenius 1969, 601) izvemo, da je vrsta Anancus arvernensis značilna za zgornji pliocen in starejši pleistocen. Thenius (1969, 604, sl. 697) primerja med seboj različne rodove mastodontov. Iz slike je razvidno, da je imela vrsta Anancus arvernensis okle samo v zgornji čeljusti in da so bili ti razmeroma ravni in zelo dolgi. V spodnji čeljusti je prišlo do redukcije tega sekalca. Obstajajo tudi številne sodobnejše sistematike proboscidov, ki se med seboj bolj malo razlikujejo. Navajamo nekaj novejših podatkov o sistematiki trobčarjev. Po Maierju (1993) je sistematska razvrstitev naslednja: razred Mammalia Linné 1758, podrazred Theria Parker in Haswell 1897, nižji razred Eutheria Gill 1872, red Proboscidea Illiger 1811, podred Euelephantoidea, družina Gomphotheriidae Cabrera 1929 (Trilophodontidae Simpson 1931), rod Anancus Aymard 1855. Colbert in Morales (1994) imata sistematiko takšno kot Maier (1993), le da upoštevata še naddružino Gomphotherioidea, ki je pri Maierju ni. Njuna razvrstitev je: deblo Chordata, poddeblo Vertebrata, razred Mammalia, podrazred Theria, nižji razred Eutheria, red Proboscidea, podred Euelephantoidea, naddružina Gomphotherioidea. Dubrovo (1997, 165 s) je mnenja, da rod Anancus danes nima naslednikov, filogenetske prednike pa ima v rodovih Tetralophodon in miocenskem Gomphothe-riumu. Rakovec (1954, 105 ss) poroča, da je vrsta Anancus arvernensis živela v srednjem in zgornjem pliocenu in starejšem pleistocenu. Značilna je za evropski prostor (najdena je bila v številnih državah), najdlje pa se je zadržala na Pirenejskem in Apeninskem polotoku. Isti avtor (1954, 107) tudi piše, da so bili mastodonti prilagojeni na toplo in razmeroma vlažno podnebje. Anancus arvernensis (Croizet et Jobert, 1828) (t. 1-3) 1912 Mastodon arvernensis Cro. et Job. - Gorjano-vič-Kramberger, 14, tab. 1, 7, 7a OPISI OHRANJENIH OSTANKOV ANANKUSOVEGA OKLA Ohranjenih je pet različno velikih delov trobčarjevega okla vrste Anancus arvernensis in zelo veliko majhnih in drobnih ostankov zobovine ali dentina, ki so preostanek zdrobljenih delov okla. Največji, okrog 200 mm dolg ostanek okla je na določenih delih zlepljen s konglomeratom in peščenjakom (t. 1: 1a-1b). Manjša površina okla je razkrita. Večji premer okla na sredini meri 122 mm in manjši 119 mm, njegov obseg je okrog 400 mm. V preseku je ostanek ovalne oblike (t. 1: 1b). Vse druge strukturne Maier (1993) they are classified as follows: class Mammalia Linné 1758, subclass Theria Parker et Haswell 1897, infraclass Eutheria Gill 1872, order Proboscidea Illiger 1811, suborder Euelephantoidea, family Gomphotheriidae Cabrera 1929 (Trilophodontidae Simpson 1931), genus Anancus Aymard 1855. Colbert and Morales (1994) use the same classification as Maier (1993), with the only difference being that they included the superfamily Gomphotherioidea, which cannot be found in Maier's classification. Their classification goes as follows: phylum Chordata, sub-phylum Vertebrata, class Mammalia, subclass Theria, infraclass Eutheria, order Proboscidea, suborder Euel-ephantoidea, superfamily Gomphotherioidea. According to Dubrovo (1997, 165 f) the genus Anancus does not have any successors today, while the phylogenetic predecessors can be found in the genus Tetralophodon and the Miocene genus Gomphotherium. Rakovec (1954, 105 ff) reported that the species Anancus arvernensis lived in the Mid and Late Pliocene and the Early Pleistocene. The species is characteristic of the European territories, and was found in a number of countries; however it persisted the longest on the Iberian and Apennine peninsulas. The same author (1954, 107) wrote that the mastodons were adjusted to a warm and relatively damp climate. Anancus arvernensis (Croizet et Jobert, 1828) (Pl. 1-3) 1912 Mastodon arvernensis Cro. et Job. -Gorjanovič-Kramberger, 14, Pl. 1, 7, 7a DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESERVED REMAINS OF THE ANANCUS TUSK Five different sized samples of the Proboscidea tusk of the species Anancus arvernensis and a number of small and very small remains of dentine (remains of crushed tusk parts) have been discovered. The largest - approximately 200 mm long - tusk remain is in some parts stuck to the conglomerate and sandstone (Pl. 1: 1a-1b). A small surface of the tusk can be seen. The larger diameter of the tusk measures 122 mm in the centre while the smaller one measures 119 mm, and has a circumference of approximately 400 mm. The tusk remain has an oval cross-section (Pl. 1: 1b). All other structural characteristics of the dentine and the orientation of certain materials is the same as with the smaller parts belonging to this tusk. The find is in poor condition, for the dentine (hydrophosphate) and the surrounding rock are disintegrating. The binding includes quite a lot of carbonate, thus the individual silicate pebbles are poorly bound. This is a značilnosti dentina in usmerjenost določenih mineralov so takšne kot pri manjših delih istega okla. Najdba je v slabem stanju, saj zobovina (hidrofosfat) in okolišna kamnina razpadata. V vezivu je precej karbonata, zato je zlepljenost posameznih silikatnih prodnikov slaba. V bistvu gre za zelo slabo vezan konglomerat z lečami peščenjaka, ki razpada v prod in pesek. Velikost dela je 250 x 165 x 133 mm. Drugi ostanek istega okla je predstavljen na tabli 2: 1. Velikost kosa konglomerata in peščenjaka je 165 x 126 x 80 mm. Ohranjen je del okla, katerega premer meri 124 mm. Tretji, manjši kos peščenjaka in konglomerata meri 103 x 89 x 45 mm. Na omenjeni kamnini je tanka zunanja plast zobovine, ki je prav tako del največjega kosa najdbe. Ostanek zobovine je velik 90 x 60 x 3-5 mm (t. 2: 2). Na tabli 2: 3 je četrti, manjši delček okla, velik 95 x 87 mm, ki je z delom primarne zobne površine pritrjen na konglomerat. V bistvu so ohranjeni skromni ostanki rumenkastega zelo higroskopičnega dentina. Na dentinu sta opazni radialna in koncentrična struktura. V prečnem preseku okla je v dentinu opazen "Schregerjev strukturni vzorec" (t. 2: 3), ki je značilen za proboscide (Abelova 2008). V radialni in krožni smeri so številni temni vključki, najverjetneje manganovih raztopin. Ponekod so vidni lepi dendriti psilomelana, sem in tja se najdejo tudi posamezni kristalčki pirita. Nekateri deli okla so limonitizirani, najmočneje tisti ob stiku s konglomeratom oziroma zunanji deli okla. Prodniki v konglomeratu so zelo različnih velikosti in oblik. Po sestavi pripadajo kremenu in metamorfnim kamninam, v vezivu so znova manjši prodniki kremena in drugih kamnin ter številne luskice sljude. Zadnji kos (t. 2: 4) konglomerata je velik 143 x 105 x 107 mm. Na njem je prilepljena tanka zunanja plast zobovine, ki meri 120 x 78 x 5 mm. Plast zobovine je odtrgana od največjega dela okla. poorly bound conglomerate with sandstone particles that keep disintegrating into gravel and sand. The size of the piece measures 250 x 165 x 133 mm. The second remain of the same tusk is presented in plate 2: 1. The size of the conglomerate and sandstone piece measures 165 x 126 x 80 mm. Preserved is a part of the tusk with a diameter of 124 mm. This is followed by the third - smaller - sandstone and conglomerate piece that measures 103 x 89 x 45 mm. On the aforementioned rock we can find a thin layer of dentine which is also a part of the largest piece. The dentine remain measures 90 x 60 x 3-5 mm (Pl. 2: 2). Plate2: 3 depicts the fourth, even smaller, piece of the tusk that measures 95 x 87 mm, and which is attached to the conglomerate with a part of the primary dental surface. In essence we are dealing with modest remains of yellowish and extremely hygroscopic dentine. The dentine reveals a radial and concentric structure. The cross section of the tusk reveals a clearly visible 'Schreger structural pattern' (Pl. 2: 3), which is typical for Proboscidea (Abelova 2008). The tusk reveals numerous dark inclusions in the radial and circular direction, most likely these are manganese solutions. Psilomelane dendrites are clearly visible in certain places, while in others one can even find individual pyrite crystals. Some parts of the tusk are limonitized; this is most noticeable on parts that are in contact with the conglomerate or the outer parts of the tusk. The pebbles within the conglomerate differ greatly as regards their size and shape. According to their composition they consist of quartz or metamorphic rocks, while the binding includes smaller quartz pebbles and other rocks as well as numerous mica flakes. The last piece (Pl. 2: 4) is a conglomerate piece measuring 143 x 105 x 107 mm. A thin outer layer of dentine measuring 120 x 78 x 5 mm is stuck to the conglomerate. The dentine layer has been torn from the largest part of the tusk. PRIMERJAVA COMPARISON Gorjanovic-Kramberger (1912, tab. 1, sl. 7, 7a) predstavlja del okla iz zgornjepliocenskih plasti najdišča Bratovština pri Petrinji na Hrvaškem, ki je po obliki prereza in velikosti podoben našemu primerku iz najdišča Kicar. Prerez hrvaškega primerka je nekoliko manjši od našega, kar je lahko povezano tudi s položajem odlomljenega fragmenta v celem oklu. Prerezi in velikosti okla se razlikujejo v distalnem, srednjem in proksimalnem delu. V sloveniji je bilo največ delov anankusovih oklov najdenih v Šaleški kotlini. Okli anankusa so bili zelo dolgi in precej izravnani. sicer pa je primerjava manjših ostankov okla z drugimi bolje ohranjenimi okli zelo težavna. Determinacija vrste z ostankom okla iz Kicarja je nezanesljiva, povsem zanesljiva bi bila, če bi našli določene dele ostalega anankusovega zobovja. Gorjanovic-Kramberger (1912, Pl. 1: Figs. 7, 7a) described a part of a tusk from the Late Pliocene layers at the site Bratovština near Petrinje in Croatia, which is according to the shape of its cross-section and size similar to our sample from Kicar. The cross-section of the Croatian specimen is somewhat smaller than ours, however this could be linked to the position of the fragment within the tusk. Cross-sections and tusk sizes differ in the distal, central and proximal part. In Slovenia most Anancus tusks were found in the Šaleška valley (Šaleška dolina). Their tusks were long and rather straight. It is extremely difficult to compare the smaller tusk remains with other better preserved tusks. It is hard to determine the species merely from the tusk remain from Kicar, however this process would be reliable in we also had some of the remaining Anancus' teeth at our disposal. Ker se je velik del okla dobesedno razletel, so ostali le številni manjši in zelo majhni luskasti in iverasti fragmenti zobovine (t. 3: 2-3), ki jih ne moremo umestiti na ustrezno mesto oklovega ostanka. To zobovino bomo ohranili in uporabili za preostale mikroskopske in kemične raziskave. As a large part of the tusk has literally fallen to bits a number of smaller and very small flakes and splinter like teeth fragments remain (Pl. 3: 2-3), and these cannot be placed back into their position within the tusk remain. However, this dentine will be preserved and used for microscopic and chemical research. SKLEPI CONCLUSIONS Klastične kamnine, v katerih je bil najden del okla v širši okolici Kicarja, točneje na njegovem jugozahodnem robu nasproti zaselka Žabjak, so pliocenske starosti (Žnidarčič, Mioč 1988; 1989). Po našem mnenju so slabo vezani konglomerati in peščenjaki iz starejšega villafranchija. Najdeni ostanek zoba je skromen in problematičen, najverjetneje pripada mastodontu vrste Anancus arvernensis. Ostanek okla je razpadel na večji del (t. 1: 1a-1b) in štiri manjše dele (t. 2: 1-4). Vsi predstavljeni deli so sestavni del istega dela okla. Veliko zobovine, ki je zelo higroskopična, je razpadlo na številne manjše delce in zelo majhne iveri in luske, ki jih ni mogoče znova zlepiti v celoto. V prečnem preseku je pri posameznih delih okla opaziti za proboscide značilen "Schregerjev strukturni vzorec" (t. 3: 1-3). Posamezni fragmenti okla so pritrjeni na prodnike oziroma na slabo vezan kremenovo-silikatni konglomerat, ponekod tudi na pesek in peščenjak. okel je bil najverjetneje prenesen z rečnim tokom in razlomljen, njegovi posamezni deli so se ohranili na določenih mestih skupaj z naplavljenimi in akumuliranimi prodniki in peščenimi delci. Dokler je bil fragment okla v sprijetem sedimentu, je ostal v enem delu, po izkopu in odvzemu iz profila je začel razpadati na večje, manjše in vse manjše delce. Preostanek v prod in pesek povsem razpadle kamnine smo temeljito sprali in pregledali njihovo sestavo. Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je med debelejšo frakcijo (prodniki velikosti od 87 x 45 mm do 9 x 4 mm) manj kot polovica kremenovih prodnikov, prevladujejo pa silikatni prodniki, pretežno različnih metamorfnih kamnin. Prodniki so valjasti, ploščati in kroglasti. Prevladujejo ploščati, manj je valjastih in najmanj kroglastih prodnikov. V zelo drobni prodni in peščeni frakciji prevladujejo kremenova zrna, pogostna so tudi zrna drugih kamnin, pirita, luskice sljude in delci drugih mineralov. V vezivu klastitov je razmeroma veliko kalcijevega karbonata, saj je bila reakcija na ustrezno razredčeno in hladno klorovodikovo kislino burna oziroma zelo odzivna. The clastic rocks, in which a part of the tusk from the broader vicinity of Kicar (or to be more exact from its south-western edge opposite the hamlet of Zabjak) was found, belong to the Pliocene period (Znidarcic, Mioc 1988; 1989). In our opinion the poorly bound conglomerates and sandstones belong to the older Villafranchian period. The discovered tooth remain is modest and problematic, and most likely belongs to a mastodon of the species Anancus arvernensis. The tusk remain disintegrated into one large (Pl. 1: 1a-1b) and four smaller parts (Pl. 2: 1-4). All of the presented pieces are a part of the same tusk. A large portion of the highly hygroscopic dentine has disintegrated into a number of smaller parts and very small splinters and flakes that can no longer be glued back into a whole. In the cross-section individual pieces reveal the 'Schreger structural pattern' that is characteristic of Proboscidae (Pl. 3: 1-3). Individual tusk fragments are attached to pebbles or to the poorly bound quartz-silicate conglomerate, in some places also on sand or sandstone. The tusk was most likely transported by the river and it was during this journey that we assume it was broken into smaller parts. In certain places the individual tusk parts remained together and stuck onto accumulated pebbles and sand particles. As long as the tusk fragment remained within the sediment it was preserved in a single piece, however once it was dug out it began to disintegrate into large, small and minute parts. The remnants of the rock that disintegrated into gravel and sand was thoroughly washed and its composition was studied. It was ascertained that the thicker fraction (pebbles measuring between 87 x 45 mm and 9 x 4 mm) consisted of less than 50 % of quartz pebbles, and that the majority was represented by silicate pebbles, mainly from various metamorphic rocks. The pebbles are cylindrical, flat or round in shape. Most of them are flat, slightly poorer represented are cylindrical pebbles and the round ones are the rarest. Quartz granules prevail in the minute pebble and sand fraction, however rock granules, pyrite, mica flakes and parts of other minerals are also common. The clastic rocks binding includes a relatively high share of calcium carbonate, for the reaction onto the appropriate diluted and cold Hydrochloric acid is turbulent i.e. highly reactive. Zahvale Najditelju okla gospodu Francu Golobu s Ptuja se iskreno zahvaljujemo za darovane najdbe in za koristne podatke o najdišču. Kustosinji Prirodoslovnega muzeja Slovenije, geologinji Katarini Krivec se zahvaljujemo za posredovanje najdbe v določitev, za tehnično in fotografsko pomoč pa sodelavcu Marijanu Grmu. Acknowledgment We are truly thankful to the finder of the tusk, Mr. Franc Golob from Ptuj, for handing over the finds and all of the useful data as regards the site. We would also like to thank the geologist Katarina Krivic, the custodian at the Slovenian Museum of Natural History, for the access to the finds and of course our co-worker Marijan Grm for all the technical and photographic help he provided. Translation: Sunčan Patrick Stone LITERATURA / REFERENCES ÄBELOVÄ, M. 2008, Schreger pattern analysis of Mammuthus primigenius tusk: analytical approach and utility. - Bulletin Geosciences 83/2, 225-232. BREZIGAR, a. 1997, Lega mastodontovih najdišč iz leta 1964 v velenjski premogonosni skladovnici (Mastodon finding places (1964) in the Velenje coal succession). - Geološki zbornik 12, 8-40. COLBERT, E. H. in / and M. MORALES 1994, Evolution of the Vertebrates. A History of the Backboned Animals Through Time. - New York. DROBNE, K. 1967, Izkopavanje mastodonta v Škalah pri Velenju. - Geologija 10, 305-312. DROBNE, K. 1983, Mastodonti Velenjske kotline. - Geološki zbornik 3, 37. DUBROVO, I. A. 1997, fossil Proboscideans.(Fo-silni trobčarji). - Geološki zbornik 12, 159-197. GORJANOVIC-KRAMBERGER, D. 1912, Fosilni proboscidi Hrvatske i Slavonije. - Djela JAZU 21, 5-23, zagreb. LENARDIC, J. in / and V. POHAR 1997, Distribution of the Mastodonts in Slovenia (Razširjenost mastodontov v Sloveniji). - Geološki zbornik 12, 105-130. MAIER, W. 1993, Klassifikation der Vertebrata. - V / In: R. L. Carroll (ur. / ed.), Paläontologie und Evolution der Wirbeltiere, 581-636, Stuttgart, New York. MIKUŽ, V. 1998, Nova najdba mastodontove-ga zoba iz bližnje okolice Ptuja (The new finding of Mastodont's tooth from vicinity of Ptuj, NE Slovenia). -Geologija 41, 127-133. MIKUŽ, V. 2007, Prva najdba mamuta v Prekmur-ju, severnovzhodna Slovenija (The first find of mam- moth in Prekmurje, Northeast Slovenia). - Razprave IV. razreda SAZU 48/1, 157-177. POHAR, V. 1963-1964, Najdba mastodonta v pliocenskih plasteh v Škalah pri Velenju. - Varstvo narave 2-3, 211-214. POHAR, V., K. DROBNE in / and F. DROBNE 1997, Zgodovina odkritja fosilnih ostankov mastodontov v Velenjski kotlini. - Geološki zbornik 12, 41-70. RAKOVEC, I. 1954, O novi najdbi mastodontovih ostankov na Slovenskem. - Geologija 2, 94-112. RAKOVEC, I. 1968, O mastodontih Šaleške doline. - Razprave IV. razreda SAZU 11, 301-350. RAKOVEC, I. 1997, About the osteological differences between the species Bunolophodon (Anancus) arvernensis (Croizet et Jobert) and Zygolophodon borsoni (Hays) (O osteoloških razlikah med vrstama Bunolopho-don (Anancus) arvernensis (Croizet & Jobert) in Zygolophodon borsoni (Hays)). - Geološki zbornik 12, 71-104. THENIUS, E. 1969, Phylogenie der Mammalia. Stammesgeschichte der Säugetiere (einschliesslich der Hominiden). - Berlin. VAUFREY, R. 1958, Proboscidea, étude systématique. - V / In: J. Piveteau, Traité de Paléontologie VI/2, 203-295, Paris. ŽNIDARČIČ, M. in / and P. MIOČ 1988, Osnovna geološka karta SFRJ 1:100 000, list Maribor in Leibnitz. -Beograd. ŽNIDARČIČ, M. in / and P. MIOČ 1989, Tolmač za lista Maribor in Leibnitz. Osnovna geološka karta SFRJ 1:100 000. - Beograd. T. 1: la - največji ostanek okla vrste Anancus arvernensis (Croizet et Jobert, 1828) v zgornjepliocenskem (spodnjevillafranchij-skem) konglomeratu iz južnozahodnega dela Kicarja oziroma z območja med Kicarjem na severu in Podvinci na jugu; najditelj Franc Golob s Ptuja, velikost 200 x 122 x 119 mm; Ib - isti primerek v prečnem preseku z radialno in koncentrično strukturo. Premera okla 122 x 119 mm, obseg meri ~400 mm. (Foto: Marijan Grm.) Pl. 1: la - The largest tusk remain of Anancus arvernensis (Croizet et Jobert, 1828) in the Late Pliocene (Early Villafranchian) conglomerate from southwest part of Kicar, i.e. from the area between Kicar in the north and Podvinci in the south; finder Franc Golob from Ptuj, size 200 x 122 x 119 mm; lb - Cross section of the same specimen, with radial and concentric structure. Diameters 122 x 119 mm, circumference of the tusk ~400 mm. (Photo: Marijan Grm.) T .2: 1 - Prečni presek okla vrste Anancus arvernensis (Croizet et Jobert, 1828) v peščenjaku in konglomeratu, Kicar, velikost kosa 165 x 126 x 80 mm; 2 - del oklove površine v debelozrnatem peščenjaku in konglomeratu, Kicar, velikost kosa 103 x 89 x 45 mm; 3 - del istega okla v konglomeratu, velikost zobovine 95 x 87 mm; 4 - del istega okla v konglomeratu, velikost kosa 143 x 105 x 107 mm. (Foto: Marijan Grm.) Pl. 2: 1 - Cross section of tusk Anancus arvernensis (Croizet et Jobert, 1828) in the sandstone and conglomerate, Kicar, size of sample 165 x 126 x 80 mm; 2 - part of tusk area in coarse-grained sandstone and conglomerate, Kicar, size of sample 103 x 89 x 45 mm; 3 - part of the same tusk in conglomerate, size of dentine 95 x 87 mm; 4 - part of the same tusk in conglomerate, size of sample 143 x 105 x 107 mm. (Photo: Marijan Grm.) T. 3: 1 - "Schregerjev strukturni vzorec" na zobovini trobčarja vrste Anancus arvernensis (Croizet et Jobert, 1828), Kicar, velikost detajla 25 x 23 mm z vzorca [3]; 2 - manjši kos zobovine s "Schregerjevim strukturnim vzorcem", velikost kosa 30 x 23 mm; 3 - večji kos zobovine s "Schregerjevim strukturnim vzorcem" in radialno-koncentričnimi psilomelanovimi dendriti, velikost kosa 61 x 55 x 22 mm; 4 - detajl psilomelanovih dendritov z vzorca [3], velikost detajla 18 x 14 mm. (Foto: Marijan Grm.) Pl. 3: 1 - "Schreger structural pattern" on the proboscidean dentine of Anancus arvernensis (Croizet et Jobert, 1828), Kicar, detail size 25 x 23 mm from sample[3]; 2 - smaller piece of dentine with "Schreger structural pattern", size of piece 30 x 23 mm; 3 - larger piece of dentine with "Schreger structural pattern" and radial-concentrically dendritic psilomelane, size of sample 61 x 55 x 22 mm; 4 - detail of dendritic psilomelane from sample [3], size of detail 18 x 14 mm. (Photo: Marijan Grm.) fossil and subfossil remains of Capra ibex, L. FRoM salzofenhohle (upper austria) and the eastern alpine region FOSILNI IN SUBFOSILNI OSTANKI VRSTE Capra ibex, L. IZ NAJDIŠČA SALZOFENHÖHLE (ZGORNJA AVSTRIJA) IN Z VZHODNOALPSKEGA PROSTORA Martina PACHER Abstract Fossil and subrecent Capra ibex is proved in many Austrian and Eastern Alpine caves but usually only few specimens were recovered. Salzofenhohle (2005 m a.s.l.) provided a larger assemblage of ibex remains which was excavated between 1924 and 1964. The material containing 221 specimens is presented in detail for the first time and compared to ibex remains from the Drachenhöhle near Mixnitz, Styria and the Upper Palaeolithic loess site of Willendorf, Lower Austria. Since the volume is dedicated to one of the leading scientists for the Palaeolithic research in Slovenia, Ivan Turk, remains of ibex from sites in Slovenia are included. Capra ibex is mentioned here for the first time from Potočka zijalka. At Salzofenhöhle, carnivore activity is detected on the ibex remains whereas there is no proven evidence of human hunting. Three horn cores bear modern hacking marks and fire traces which suggest an actual input of these remains. In the absence of direct radiocarbon dates, the chronological position of the finds stays unclear. Morphometrical comparison speaks in favour of the assemblage from Salzofenhöhle consisting mainly of females and younger individuals. The comparison of values shows that the fossil specimens lie at the upper range of size distribution of modern ibex in both, males and females. More detailed studies are needed to detect the degree of size differences between the sexes but also between modern and fossil ibex populations. More direct radiocarbon dates are needed to assess the chronological distribution and the role of ungulates at high Alpine cave sites. Keywords: Capra ibex, Salzofenhöhle, Willendorf, Eastern Alpine region, metrical analysis Izvleček Fosilni in subrecentni ostanki vrste Capra ibex so znani iz več avstrijskih in vzhodnoalpskih jam, vendar je število najdenih kosti in zob običajno pičlo. Salzofenhöhle (2005 m n. m.) ponuja drugačno sliko, saj je bilo v tej jami med letoma 1924 in 1964 izkopanih 221 kozorogovih ostankov. Gre za razmeroma obsežen vzorec, ki je prvič detajlneje predstavljen na tem mestu. Osrednji del predstavitve je namenjen metrični analizi, kjer so kot primerjalni material služili kozorogi iz jame Drachen pri Mixnitzu (Drachenhöhle), z avstrijske Štajerske ter iz mlajšepleistocenskega najdišča Willendorf v Spodnji Avstriji. Ker je zbornik posvečen Ivanu Turku, enemu vodilnih raziskovalcev paleolitskega obdobja v Slovenji, so v prispevku obravnavane tudi kozorogove najdbe s Slovenskega, z na tem mestu prvič omenjenim ostankom iz Potočke zijalke vred. Na gradivu iz jame Salzofen so opazne sledi zverske aktivnosti, medtem ko na dokaze o človekovem lovu izkopavalci niso naleteli. Trije primerki rožnice so delno ožgani, kažejo pa tudi sledi novodobnih urezov, zato gre najbrž za alohtone najdbe. Žal neposrednih radiokarbonskih datacij ni na razpolago, tako da ostaja natančnejša kronološka opredelitev najdb nejasna. Iz rezultatov morfometrične študije izhaja, da obsega gradivo iz jame Salzofen predvsem ostanke samic in mlajših živali. Pri tem je že osnovna primerjava velikosti pokazala, da se pleistocenski primerki pri obeh spolih umeščajo na sam zgornji rob razpona vrednosti za recentne kozoroge. Za detajlnejše preučevanje razlik v velikosti med samci in samicami oz. med populacijami iz različnih geoloških obdobij bi potrebovali bolj poglobljen analitičen pristop. Prav tako bi bilo treba za popolnejše razumevanje kronološke razporeditve in vloge kopitarjev v alpskih visokogorskih jamskih najdiščih nujno pridobiti dodatne radiokarbonske datacije. Ključne besede: Capra ibex, Salzofenhöhle, Willendorf, vzhodnoalpski prostor, metrična analiza INTRODUCTION UVOD Capra ibex is one of the symbols of the modern Alpine wild life. Nearly driven to the edge of extinction, in Austria latest 1710 (Bauer, Spitzenberger 2001), its number recovered considerably since the re-introduction of colonies starting in Switzerland 1911, and Austria 1924 (Bauer, Spitzenberger 2001) thanks to protection, breeding, and further re-introduction of animals in various parts of the Alps. The Late Pleistocene cave site of Salzofenhohle in Upper Austria provided a 221 specimen assemblage of fossil and subfossil ibex remains. The cave, known as a high Alpine cave bear den (Doppes et al. 1997; Doppes 2001) lies at 2005 m above sea level in the mountain range of the Totes Gebirge in Upper Austria (Fig. 1). The first fossils were found in 1924 and led to continuing excavations by the local school inspector Otto Korber until 1944. Kurt Ehrenberg from the University of Vienna started systematic excavations in 1939 which lasted until 1964, with an interruption from 1954 until 1955. The 3,588 m long cave system consists of large chambers, corridors, fissures and shafts at several levels (Pfarr, Stummer 1988). The sediments provided a rich Fig. 1: Ibex sites included in the study. Sl. 1: V prispevku omenjena najdišča s kozorogovimi ostanki. Kozorog velja za enega od simbolov današnje alpske favne. V začetku 18. stoletja je bila vrsta na robu izumrtja (zadnji podatek za Avstrijo iz tistega obdobja je iz leta 1710; Bauer, Spitzenberger 2001), s ponovnima naselitvama v Švici leta 1911 ter v Avstriji leta 1924 (Bauer, Spitzenberger 2001) pa se je stanje začelo postopoma izboljševati. K temu so prispevali tudi odločitev o zavarovanju vrste, aktivna politika vzreje ter več novih poskusov ponovne naselitve v različne dele Alp. Na mlajšepleistocenskem jamskem najdišču Salzofenhohle v Zgornji Avstriji je bilo najdenih 221 ostankov vrste Capra ibex. Jama, ki je sicer znana kot visokogorski brlog jamskega medveda (Doppes et al. 1997; Doppes 2001), se odpira na gorskem grebenu Totes Gebirge na nadmorski višini 2.005 m (sl. 1). Prve fosilne najdbe so bile odkrite leta 1924 in so botrovale odločitvi lokalnega šolskega inšpektorja Otta Korberja k nepretrganemu terenskemu raziskovanju najdišča vse do leta 1944. Leta 1939 je Kurt Ehrenberg z dunajske univerze zastavil še sistematična izkopavanja, ki so s prekinitvijo v letih 1954-55 potekala do leta 1964. Razvit, 3.588 m dolg jamski sistem sestavljajo velike dvorane, rovi, razpoke in brezna na več ravneh (Pfarr, Stummer 1988). V obsežnem favnističnem gradivu, ki sicer obsega tudi najdbe mehkužcev in malih sesalcev, močno prevladujejo ostanki jamskega medveda in drugih zveri (npr. volka, lisice, kune zlatice, rjavega medveda, jamskega leva, rosomaha). Ker celoten korpus najdb še nikoli ni bil natančneje obdelan, je na seznam v jami zastopanih rastlinojedov za zdaj mogoče vključiti zgolj srno, gamsa in kozoroga. Gradivo je najbrž kronološko heterogeno; neposredne radiokarbonske datacije so razpoložljive zgolj za ostanke jamskega medveda (> 49.100 pred sedanjostjo (= p. s.); Doppes 2003) in rosomaha (neobjavljeni podatki). V nadaljevanju so podrobneje predstavljeni ostanki kozoroga. GRADIVO Kozorogovi ostanki iz jame Salzofen so bili deloma pobrani, deloma izkopani na več različnih mestih, a žal brez beleženja natančnejših stratigrafskih podatkov. Danes je tako nemogoče rekonstruirati mesto najdbe vsake posamezne kosti oz. zoba, čeprav je nekaj takšnih mest v jami vendarle znanih. tako Ehrenberg (1949) poroča, da je Korber na lokaciji t. i. brezna žrtev ("Opferschacht") odkril ostanke najmanj dveh odraslih in ene mlade živali. O najdbi več kot enega kozoroga poročajo z območja vhodne dvorane (Vorraum), nadaljnjih sedem kosti pa je bilo pobranih/izkopanih tudi v rovu Rundzug, povezanem z njo. Po Ehrenbergu (1964) je šest najdb ležalo na območju med vhodno dvorano in rovom Rundzug, posamezni ostanki pa izvirajo tudi z lokacij fossil and sUBFOssiL REMAINs OF Capra ibex, L. ... FOsiLNI IN subfosilni OsTANKI VRsTE Capra ibex, L. ... faunal assemblage, including micro fauna and molluscs, dominated by cave bear and various carnivores, like wolf, red fox, pine marten, brown bear, cave lion, and wolverine. Among herbivores, roe deer, deer, chamois and ibex are proved but a detailed faunal analysis is missing, so far. The material is probably chronologically heterogeneous and direct dates are available for cave bear (> 49,100 BP; Döppes 2003) and wolverine (unpublished data). The sample from ibex is presented in the following study. MATERIAL Ibex remains were partly collected, partly excavated at several places within the cave. No details about its stratigraphy are known. It is not possible to reconstruct the origin of each single element but several localities can be detected from the literature. From the "Opferschacht" (shaft of victims) a steep debris slope with bone remains, Korber recovered at least two adult and one juvenile individual (Ehrenberg 1949). Within the Vorraum (entrance hall) remains of more than one animal were found. The following corridor called Rundzug provided seven ibex bones (Ehrenberg 1965). An additional six bones are listed from an area between the entrance hall (Vorraum) and the corridor (Rundzug) after Ehrenberg (1964). The Vp110 locality provided additional remains (Ehrenberg 1965). Several bones came from areas called "Schrammelgang", "Graf Kesselstattdom", and "Lowen-schacht" (lion's shaft), and a further small number of specimens were recovered in 1963 in a passage towards the "opferschacht". The analyzed material consists of 221 remains housed at the Kammerhofmuseum in bad Aussee, Styria (Tab. 1). A minimum number of three juvenile and nine adult individuals is presented. The ibex material from Salzofenhohle seems to be heterogeneous in terms of its phylogenetic level. Mottl (1950, 34) referred them to a small form of ibex without exception, contrary to Ehrenberg (1956), who mentioned also larger remains of a so-called Ibex priscus-type. In the actual study, in order to compare the size range of the ibex assemblage from the Salzofenhohle, the material from Drachenhohle near Mixnitz (Sickenberg 1931) and the Palaeolithic open air site of Willendorf (Thenius 1959, 156) is included. The ibex remains from Willendorf come from the Willendorf I, I/N, and II localities and comprise approx. Tab. 1: Ibex remains from Salzofenhöhle at the Kammerhofmuseum (Bad Aussee) according to body side and age. Abbreviations: ad. - adult; juv. - juvenile. Tab. 1: Kozorogovi ostanki iz jame Salzofen, ki jih hrani Kammerhofmuseum (Bad Ausee), po anatomski orientiranosti in starosti. Kratici: ad. - odrasel; juv. - mlad. Vp110, "Schrammelgang", "Graf Kesselstattdom" ter t. i. levjega brezna ("Löwenschacht"; Ehrenberg 1965). Manjše število najdb je bilo leta 1963 pobranih tudi na enem od dostopov k t. i. breznu žrtev ("Opferschacht"). Skupno je bilo v jami Salzofen najdenih 221 kozoro-govih ostankov, ki jih hrani Kammerhofmuseum v Bad Ausseeju na avstrijskem Štajerskem (tab. 1). Najmanjše število živali (MNI; Minimum Number of Individuals) za mlade živali je tri, za odrasle pa devet. Najdbe vrste C. ibex iz jame Salzofen se zdijo filogenetsko heterogene. Mottl (1950, 34) jih je sicer vse pripisal isti majhni obliki kozoroga, vendar pa Ehrenberg (1956) omenja tudi večje primerke t. i. tipa Ibex priscus. v okviru metrične analize, ki se ji posvečamo v nadaljevanju, je bilo primerjalno upoštevano tudi gradivo iz najdišč Drachenhöhle pri Mixnitzu (Sickenberger 1931) ter Willendorf (Thenius 1959, 156). Kozorogovi ostanki iz Willendorfa izvirajo z lokacij Willendorf I, I/N ter II in obsegajo pribl. 270 kosti in zob. Najbolj znana lokacija je Willendorf II z devetimi kulturnimi horizonti, obsegajočimi najdbe orinasjenske in gravetjenske kulture, ter s serijo radiokarbonskih datacij v razponu od 41.700 p. s. do 23.180 p. s. (Nigst et al. 2008). Kozorogi iz Willendorfa po velikosti praviloma presegajo recentne primerke, zato so bili opisani kot Capra ibexprisca, Woldrich (Thenius 1959, 156). Element sin dex indet Total / (ad. / juv.) (ad. / juv.) (ad. / juv. ) skupaj Cranium+horn 12 / 4 16 Mandibula S / - S / S 9 Costae 16 / S 19 Sternum 1 / - 1 Cerv. vertebrae 11 / 2 lS Thor. vertebrae 10 / lS 23 Lum. vertebrae 11 / 7 18 Vertebrae 4 / - 4 Sacrum S / - S Scapula 4 / - 4 / - - / 1 9 Humerus 5 / 2 S / - - / 2 12 Radius/ulna S / 2 8 / - lS Metacarpalia 1 / 2 S Carpalia S S Pelvis 7 / 1 4 / - 12 Femur 5 / 1 9 / 1 16 Tibia S / S 5 / 2 lS Os maleolare 1 1 Patella 1 1 Metatarsalia 5 / - 4 / - 9 Astragalus 1 1 2 Calcaneus 2 1 5 Tarsalia 1 1 Metapodia 1 1 Phalanx 1 2 / - 2 Phalanx 2 4 / - 4 / - 8 Phalanx 3 4 / - 4 270 bones. The most famous site is locality II with nine cultural horizons of Aurignacian and Gravettian provenience and a series of radiocarbon dates ranging from 41,700 BP up to 23,180 BP. (Nigst et al. 2008). The ibex individuals from Willendorf are on average larger than modern Alpine ibex and therefore described as Capra ibexprisca, Woldrich (Thenius 1959, 156). The ibex assemblage from Drachenhohle near Mixnitz consists of 64 remains, among them 44 bones of one single juvenile individual (Sickenberg 1931). The material is ascribed to Capra ibex alpinus. Most of the fauna remains from Drachenhohle were collected during phosphate mining. Therefore only rough information about the stratigraphy of finds is known. One radiocarbon date from charcoal gave an age of 25,040 BP (Fladerer 1997) and one cave bear tooth resulted at 39,420 BP (Pacher, Stuart 2009). The ibex remains are either unstratified remains or came from the upper layers (Fladerer 1997). In Slovenia, nine cave sites and one fluviatile gravel pit yielded ibex remains (Tab. 2). So far, one metatarsal from Potočka zijalka, Slovenia, is the only evidence of ibex at this site. Capra ibex was not mentioned in the first monograph by Brodar, S. & M. (1983) and no specimen was found during the new excavations (Pacher et al. 2004), but the metatarsal, housed in the Geological Institute in Ljubljana, is clearly labelled with Potočka zijalka. Mokriška jama, only 17 km air distance away from Potočka zijalka, yielded three remains of Capra ibex. A humerus, a cervical vertebra and a juvenile maxilla fragment come from cultural layer 7 within the entrance part (Brodar 1960). One distal and one middle phalanx of the anterior extremities came from layer 2 of Jama pod Herkovimi pečmi (Pohar 1981). Črni kal yielded one second upper molar and one third upper molar from stratum 8, attributed to the Late Pleistocene (Rakovec 1958). The Late Glacial assemblage from Poljšiška cerkev contains a second lower molar, a third upper molar, and one astragalus (Pohar 1991). Only one posterior distal phalanx is proven from the Late Glacial horizon Kozorogovih ostankov iz jame Drachen pri Mixnitzu je 64, od tega jih 44 pripada isti mladi živali (Sickenberg 1931). Najdbe so bile pripisane podvrsti Capra ibex alpinus. Večina ostankov je bila pobranih med kopanjem fosfatov, zato so stratigrafski podatki znani le v grobem. Radiokarbonsko datiranje vzorca oglja je pokazalo na starost 25.040 p. s. (Fladerer 1997), zoba jamskega medveda pa na 39.420 p. s. (Pacher, Stuart 2009). Najdbe kozoroga so bodisi nestratificirane bodisi izvirajo iz zgornjih plasti (Fladerer 1997). Na Slovenskem so ostanki vrste C. ibex znani iz devetih jamskih najdišč in ene prodne jame (tab. 2). Primerek stopalnice iz Potočke zijalke je za sedaj edina znana najdba te vrste z navedenega najdišča. Kozorog namreč ni omenjen niti v monografijai iz leta 1983 (Brodar, S. in M. 1983) niti niso bili njegovi ostanki najdeni med novejšimi izkopavanji (Pacher et al. 2004). Povezava zgoraj omenjene stopalnice v hrambi ljubljanskega Geološkega inštituta z navedenim najdiščem je kljub temu zanesljiva, saj je na kosti lepo razviden napis Potočka zijalka. V Mokriški jami, ki leži zgolj 17 km zračne razdalje od Potočke zijalke, so bili najdeni trije ostanki vrste C. ibex: nadlahtnica, vratno vretence in odlomek zgornje čeljustnice mlade živali. Vsi trije izvirajo iz vhodnega dela jame in so ležali v kulturni plasti 7 (Brodar 1960). V plasti 2 jame pod Herkovimi pečmi sta bili najdeni po ena druga in tretja prstnica prednjih nog (Pohar 1981), v mlajšepleistocenski plasti 8 na Črnem kalu pa drugi in tretji zgornji meljak (Rakovec 1958). V prav tako mlajšepleistocenskem gradivu iz Poljšiške cerkve so drugi spodnji in tretji zgornji meljak ter skočnica (Pohar 1991), medtem ko sta bila v prodni jami pri Trbonjah ter v jami nad Rašico najdena odlomka lobanje (Pohar 1993). Iz poznoglacialnega horizonta Lukenjske jame izvira tretja prstnica zadnjih nog (Pohar 1983). Nekoliko več kozorogovih ostankov je bilo najdenih v Divjih babah I, in sicer devet. Primerek drugega spodnjega meljaka izvira iz plasti 6, po en tretji spodnji meljak in spodnji podočnik, ena prva ter dve drugi prstnici, stegnenica mlade živali Tab. 2: Ibex remains from cave sites and the gravel pit at Trbonje in Slovenia. Tab. 2: Kozorogovi ostanki iz slovenakih jamskih najdišč ter iz prodne jame pri Trbonjah. Site / najdišče NISP MNI Chronology of the site / kronologija najdišča Reference / viri Divje babe I 9 1 layer 2-5, layer 6, Late Pleistocene / plasti 2-5, pozni pleistocen Toškan 2007 Herkove peči 2 1 layer 2, Pleistocene / plast 2, pleistocen Pohar 1981 črni kal 2 1 stratum 8, Late Pleistocene / plast 8, pozni glacial Rakovec1958 Poljšiška cerkev 3 1 Late Glacial, Epigravettian / pozni glacial, epigravetjen Pohar 1991 Lukenjska jama 1 1 Late Glacial, Epigravettian (12,580 BP) / pozni glacial, epigravetjen (12.500 p. s.) Pohar 1983 Mokriška jama 3 1 layer 7 / plast 7 Brodar 1960 Potočka zijalka 1 1 Late Pleistocene (26,840-35,720 BP) / pozni pleistocen (26.840-35.720 p. s.) Pacher et al. 2004 jama treh bratov 11 3 Late Pleistocene / pozni pleistocen Rakovec 1940 Trbonje 1 1 Late Pleistocene / pozni pleistocen Pohar 1993 jama nad Rašico 1 1 Late Pleistocene / pozni pleistocen Pohar 1993 Tab. 3: Measurements of horn cores from Capra ibex (in mm). Abbreviations: oroab - oroaboral breadth; lat-med - lateralmedial breadth; diam - greatest diameter at the base; NHMW - Natural History Museum Vienna. Tab. 3: Velikost rožnic pri vrsti Capra ibex (v mm). Kratice: oroab - oroaboralna širina; lat-med - lateralno-medialna širina; diam - največji obseg baze; NHMW - Prirodoslovni muzej Dunaj. Site / najdišče Inv. no or locality / inv. št. oz. lokaliteta oroab lat-med diam Salzofen 114/3 subadult? 32.9 26.2 115/3 subadult? 34.6 29.0 96 115/2 subadult? 34.3 29.6 93 115/1 subadult? 28.3 25.2 95 117 45.2 27.7 1661 51.8 36.7 140 1661 48.2 33.0 126 Willendorf Wi-ll-8 79.0 65.8 235 Wi-ll-5 84.5 Wi-II-5 39.7 31.6 120 Wi-V 75.5 59.0 233 Modern male NHMW 2550 69.7 60.7 Modern female NHMW 13529 35.9 29.8 Jama treh bratov1 dex 84.0 71.5 253 Jama treh bratov1 dex 87.8 65.0 245 Jama treh bratov2 44.6 33.5 122 Trbonje1 dex 76.5 64.0 236 70- 50- 30- ▲ O ^ T T ■ • • • A • 1 after / po Pohar (1993), 2 after / po Rakovec (1940) 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Lateral-medial breadth (mm) / lateralno-medialna širina (mm) ▼ Willendorf ■ Trbonje (Pohar 1993) • Salzofen O Monaco (Giiggo 1991) (mean values / povprečne vrednosti) □ modem ibex / sodobni kozorog (NHM Wien) ^ Jama treh bratov A Coutourier 1962 (mean values / povprečne vrednosti) Fig. 2: Oroaboral and lateral-medial breadth of horn cores from Capra ibex (in mm). Data after Grigo (1991), Coutourier (1962), Pohar (1993), and own data. Sl. 2: Oroaboralna in lateralno-medialna širina rožnic pri vrsti Capra ibex (v mm). Vir podatkov: Grigo (1991); Coutourier (1962); Pohar (1993) ter lastni podatki. at Lukenjska jama (Pohar 1983). Both the gravel pit at Trbonje and Jama nad Rašico provided one skull fragment each (Pohar 1993). Divje babe I provided nine ibex remains. One second lower molar comes from layer 6, while one lower third molar, one lower canine, two middle phalanges, one proximal phalanx, one femora of a juvenile individual, and two tibia fragments - one from a subadult individual - are from layers 2-5 (Toškan 2007). Remains of at least three individuals come from Jama treh bratov (Rakovec 1940; Pohar 1993). METRICAL ANALYSIS Measurements were taken according to von den Driesch (1976). Comparison of size ranges was possible for several skeletal elements while - for others - only measurements are given. A comparison of the size of horn cores at its base results in two groups (Fig. 2). The sample from the Salzofenhohle and one specimen from Willendorf fall in dva odlomka golenice - od tega eden od subadultnega kozoroga - pa so bili pobrani iz sklopa plasti 2-5 (toškan 2007). o ostankih vsaj treh živali poročajo tudi iz Jame treh bratov (Rakovec 1940; Pohar 1993). METRIČNA ANALIZA Metrični podatki so bili zbrani v skladu s smernicami, ki jih podaja von den Driescheva (1976). Pri številčno bolje zastopanih skeletnih elementih mednaj-diščne primerjave temeljijo na vzporejanju variacijskih širin za posamezne dimenzije, drugod smo bili prisiljeni primerjati zgolj posamezne metrične podatke. Rožnice je mogoče po velikosti bazalnega dela razvrstiti v dve skupini (sl. 2). Prva obsega razmeroma majhne primerke rožnic iz jame Salzofen ter eno od treh iz Willendorfa, medtem ko sta preostali dve rožnici bistveno večji. Največji od tukaj obravnavanih rožnic sta pripadali samcema iz Jame treh bratov, pri čemer povprečje recentnih kozorogov presega tudi samcu within the smaller size group, whereas two individuals from Willendorf are considerably larger. The two males from Jama treh bratov are the largest specimens, and the male from Trbonje lies also above the modern male sample (Fig. 2). In females, the fossil sample lies slightly above the modern ibex horn core measurements. The four smallest specimens from Salzofenhohle could be from subadult individuals, as indicated by the small diameter of the horn cores at its base (Tab. 3). The large material of fossil ibex from Monaco after Griggo (1991) and the modern dataset given by Coutourier (1962) document the considerable sexual dimorphism in size. The mean values are included in figure 2. Mean values (x), size range and number of specimen (n) are given below: Oroaboral breadth: Monaco male (n = 31; 59.2-92.5 mm; x = 83.5 mm), female (n = 44; 25.5-48.5 mm; x = 39.6 mm) Modern male (n = 85; 58.9-88.0 mm; x = 71.0 mm), female (n = 45; 30.0-43.0 mm; x = 42.0 mm) Lateral-medial breadth: Monaco male (n = 31; 49.2-76.4 mm; x = 67.3 mm), female (n = 45; 21.4-38.7 mm; x = 31.5 mm) Modern male (n = 85; 51.0-74.0 mm; x = 62.2 mm), female (n = 45; 24.0-31.0 mm; x = 27.5 mm) The comparison shows that horn cores of modern Capra ibex lie at the lower end of the size range of fossil specimens. Considerably large values are obtained by single fossil individuals. This fact results in higher mean values in males and females as shown by the comparison of the fossil material from Monaco (Griggo 1991) and the modern sample from Coutourier (1962). Mandibles are preserved only as fragments. The few measurements are listed in table 4. The premolar length pripisan primerek iz Trbonj (sl. 2). Večje dimenzije pleistocenskih primerkov nasproti recentnim so bile ugotovljene tudi pri samicah. Majhen obseg baze štirih najdb iz jame Salzofen bi lahko kazal na to, da gre za ostanke subadultnih živali (tab. 3). Bogato gradivo fosilnih kozorogov iz Monaka (Griggo 1991) - enako pa izhaja tudi iz podatkov za recentne primerke (Coutourier 1962) - kaže na obstoj očitnega spolnega dimorfozma v velikosti teh živali. Povprečne vrednosti (x) so prikazane na sliki 2, skupaj s podatki o variacijski širini in velikosti vzorca (n) pa so podane tudi spodaj: Oroaboralna širina: Monako: samci (n = 31; 59,2-92,5 mm; x = 83,5 mm); samice (n = 44; 25,5-48,5 mm; x = 39,6 mm) Recentni primerki: samci (n = 85; 58,9-88,0 mm; x = 71,0 mm); samice (n = 45; 30,0-43,0 mm; x = 42,0 mm) lateralno-medialna širina: Monako: samci (n = 31; 49,2-76,4 mm; x = 67,3 mm); samice (n = 45; 21,4-38,7 mm; x = 31,5 mm) Recentni primerki: samci (n = 85; 51,0-74.0 mm; x = 62,2 mm); samice (n = 45; 24,0-31,0 mm; x = 27,5 mm) Iz predstavljene primerjave izhaja, da se rožnice recentnih kozorogov umeščajo na spodnji rob razpona vrednosti fosilnih živali, pri čemer posamezni plei-stocenski primerki izstopajo po svojih očitno večjih dimenzijah. Slednje botruje višjim povprečnim vrednostim za samce in samice pleistocenske starosti, kar nazorno kaže tudi primerjava med fosilnim gradivom iz Monaka (Griggo 1991) in vzorcem recentnih živali, ki ga je analiziral Coutourier (1962). Spodnje čeljustnice so ohranjene zgolj fragmentarno. peščica razpoložljivih metričnih podatkov je podana v tabeli 4. Dolžina niza predmeljakov kozorogov Tab. 4: Measurements of mandibles from Capra ibex (in mm). Abbreviations: tl - length of the cheekteeth row; ml - length of the molar teeth row; pl - length of premolar teeth row; p2-c - length of the diastema; hm1 - height of mandible mesial of m1; hp2 - height of mandible mesial of p2. Tab. 4: Velikost spodnjih čeljustnic pri vrsti Capra ibex (v mm). Kratice: tl - dolžina niza predmeljakov in meljakov; ml - dolžina niza meljakov; pl - dolžina niza predmeljakov; p2c - dolžina diasteme; hm1 - višina spodnje čeljustnice mezialno od m1; hp2 -višina spodnje čeljustnice mezialno od p2. Site / najdišče Inv. no. or locality / inv. št. oz. lokaliteta tl ml pl p2-c hm1 hp2 Salzofenhohle 1657 19.1 27. 1 20.7 1657-123/1 50.3 23.3 1658 25.5 44.6 26.1 17.7 1658 76.0 52.4 23.6 51.4 25.8 20.3 Willendorf Wi-II-9 37.3 Wi-II-9 24.4 Wi-I-N 27.0 Wi-I-N 22.7 Tab. 5: Measurements of scapulae from Capra ibex (in mm). Abbreviations: slc - smallest length ofthe collum; glp - greatest length of processus articularis; la - length of articulation facet; ba - breadth of articulation facet. Tab. 5: Velikost lopatic pri vrsti Capra ibex (v mm). Kratice: slc - najmanjša dolžina vratu (collum scapulae); glp - največja dolžina sklepnega odrastka (processus artucularis); la - dolžina sklepne ponvice; ba - širina sklepne ponvice. Site / najdišče Inv. no or locality / inv. št. oz. lokaliteta slc S1? Ig bg Salzofenhöhle 1645 dex 22.2 39.0 32.0 25.3 1645 sin 25.9 41.7 34.6 28.0 1637 sin 26.5 41.2 34.5 28.5 1637 dex 26.5 40.9 33.5 28.3 1637 sin 25.4 27.7 1664 24.6 38.6 28.7 26.4 1625-2 25.8 40.4 31.1 28.1 1625-2 25.7 40.0 30.9 27.3 Willendorf Wi-II-5 24.6 39.2 35.4 25.9 Wi-II-5 23.2 Wi-II-5 27.3 Wi-II-8 30.0 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Greatest depth distal (mm) / največja distataa globina (mm) ▼ WiUendorf «Salzofen ■ Mokriška jama ♦ Drachenliohle Fig. 3: Distal breadth and breadth of the trochlea of humeri from Capra ibex (in mm). Source: own data. Sl. 3: širini distalnega konca in nadlahtničnega valja (trochlea humeri) pri vrsti Capra ibex (v mm). Vir podatkov: lastni podatki. of ibex from Willendorf is partly larger than and partly of similar length to those from Salzofenhohle. Several scapulae are preserved at Salzofenhohle (Tab. 5). The scapulae are partly of similar size to those iz Willendorfa deloma presega, deloma pa se ujema s primerki iz tukaj obravnavanega najdišča Salzofenhohle. v okviru gradiva iz jame Salzofen je bilo mogoče metrično obdelati tudi osem lopatic (tab. 5). Sodeč po Tab. 6: Measurements of humeri from Capra ibex (in mm). Abbrevitions: gl - greatest length; glc - greatest length from caput humeri; bp - proximal breadth; dp - proximal depth; sd - smallest breadth of diaphysis; bd - distal breadth; bt - breadth of the trochlea. Tab. 6: Velikost nadlahtnic pri vrsti Capra ibex (v mm). Kratice: gl - največja dolžina; glc - največja dolžina merjena od sklepne glave; bp - širina proksimalnega konca; dp - globina proksimalnega konca; sd - najmanjša širina diafize; bd - širina distalnega konca; bt - širina nadlahtničnega valja (trochlea humeri). Site / najdišče Inv. no or locality / inv. št. oz. lokaliteta gl glc bp dp kd bd bt Salzofenhöhle 1642 LH 206.6 61.0 20.9 43.0 40.1 1642 DaII 49.1 61.0 1642 KE 17.2 36.0 1642 KE 40.8 38.7 1642 37.9 1640 145.5 17.7 42.9 38.8 1630 208.0 180.4 54.0 60.1 22.5 43.0 1630 202.9 178.2 51..04 56.7 21.0 42.0 38.9 Mokriška jama 225.0 205.0 64.8 32.6 46.0 41.0 Willendorf Wi-II-9 45.7 46.3 Wi-II-9 46.4 Wi-I-N 46.1 Wi-I-N 45.0 Wi-I-N 42.9 40.6 Wi-I-N 47.1 Drachenhöhle sin- ad? 25.6 48.4 45.7 sin 55.7 60.4 21.1 46.1 40.2 Tab. 7: Measurements of radii from Capra ibex (in mm). Abbreviations: pl - physiological length; bpa - breadth of the proximal articulation; for other abbreviations see table 6. Tab. 7: Velikost koželjnic pri vrsti Capra ibex (v mm). Kratice: pl - fiziološka dolžina; bpa - širina sklepa na proksimalnem koncu; za ostale okrajšave glej pripis k tabeli 6. Site / najdišče Inv. no or locality / inv. št. oz. lokaliteta gl pl bp bpa sd Bd Salzofenhöhle 1866 dex 188.8 41.2 24.5 37.7 1639 dex 178.9 170.8 40.7 22.0 38.0 1639 sin 190.7 179.5 42.3 22.8 38.1 1639 sin 179.8 168.3 40.6 22.0 37.3 1639 dex 195.0 184.4 40.6 24.6 37.9 1633 sin 194.0 183.6 41.7 23.7 39.6 1633 dex 182.6 172.1 41.5 22.1 36.5 1633 dex 191.5 185.1 40.6 22.3 38.7 Willendorf Wi-I-N 45.6 43.5 Wi-I-N 46.0 44.4 Wi-I-N 47.3 43.5 Wi-II-4 40.6 38.6 Wi-II-9 38.4 Wi-II-9 45.0 41.9 Wi-II-5 39.0 37.2 Drachenhöhle sin, ad 21.0 38.0 Tab. 8: Measurements of metacarpals of Capra ibex (in mm). Abbreviations: dd - distal depth of the articulation; for other abbreviations see table 6. Tab. 8: Velikost dlančnic pri vrsti Capra ibex (v mm). Kratice: dd - globina sklepa na distalnem koncu; za ostale okrajšave glej pripis k tabeli 6. Site / najdišče Inv. no or locality / inv. št. oz. lokaliteta gl bp dp sd bd dd Salzofenhöhle 1635 sin 30.6 20.4 18.6 1635 sin 121.2 30.1 21.7 19.1 32.8 20.1 Drachenhöhle 127.0 30.0 22.3 21.0 34.0 21.1 Willendorf Wi-II-8 41.4 21.2 Wi-II-8 42.4 23.9 Wi-II-9 42.5 Wi-II-9 49.0 23.0 Wi-II-5 32.6 22.0 Wi-I-N 39.2 Modern female1 n=12 109-133 27-32 18-23 15-19 30-35 17-21 Modern male1 n=23 124-146 30-36 20-24 18-24 34-41 17-24 1 after / po Bosold (1968) Tab. 9: Measurements of femora from Capra ibex (in mm). Abbreviations: dc - depth of the caput; for other abbreviations see table 6. Tab. 9: Velikost stegnenic pri vrsti Capra ibex (v mm). Kratice: dc - globina sklepne glave; za ostale okrajšave glej pripis k tabeli 6. Site / najdišče Inv. no or locality / inv. št. oz. lokaliteta gl glc bp dc sd Bd Salzofenhöhle 1866 dex 49.9 1866 sin 49.8 1908 227.6 223.8 57.3 27.5 22.2 48.2 1631 dex 217.5 210.4 53.8 25.6 19.2 43.9 1631 sin 229.9 226.7 58.6 27.1 21.0 45.9 1631 dex 59.2 28.4 22.5 Site / najdišče Inv. no or locality / inv. št. oz. lokaliteta gl glc bp dc sd Bd 1631 sin 217.7 213.3 52.9 26.6 20.7 46.8 1631 sin 216.0 26.4 19.5 44.4 1641 21.6 46.9 1652 54.3 1925-1 59.5 28.5 21.1 48.0 1925-1 56.0 28.1 21.1 48.6 1814 58.5 27.3 Drachenhohle sin, ad 230.0 223.0 56.1 27.8 21.6 45.9 dex, ad? 25.5 49.0 Tab. 10: Measurements of tibiae from Capra ibex (in mm). For abbreviations see tables 6 and 8. Tab. 10: Velikost golenic pri vrsti Capra ibex (v mm). Kratice: glej pripisa k tabelama 6 in 8. Site / najdišče Inv. no or locality / inv. št. oz. lokaliteta gl bp sd bd dd Salzofenhöhle 1642 KE 18.5 31.1 24.8 1813 270.0 20.0 33.2 25.3 1858 18.9 32.5 25.2 1907 266.5 52.8 18.7 33.2 25.5 1643-279 251.2 51.2 19.9 30.2 25.1 1643-280 251.1 52.6 20.0 30.2 25.2 1632 dex 251.2 50.3 18.4 29.7 24.8 1632 sin 249.1 51.3 19.0 32.3 25.8 Willendorf Wi-I-N 1 25.8 37.7 30.7 Wi-I-N 2 373 32.0 Wi-I-N 3 32.4 Wi-I-N Wi-I-N 4 37.0 28.7 Wi-II-8 27.7 39.6 30.8 Divje babe1 D.b.1091 34.0 26.5 D.b.1520 31.0 23.0 1 after / po Toškan (2007) from Willendorf and partly smaller as based on the smallest length of the collum. Most metacarpals (Tab. 8) from Willendorf are larger than those from Salzofenhohle and lie in the upper range of modern males, respectively above them. Due to this, the specimens from Salzofen rather correspond to females. In long bones (Figs. 3-4; Tabs. 6-7, 9-10) the material from Salzofenhohle forms a group of small-sized individuals. Only one humerus from Willendorf is small (Fig. 3), while one specimen from Drachenhohle and the one from the Mokriska jama lie in between. The majority of radii (Tab. 7) from Willendorf is considerably larger than from Salzofenhohle. In femora (Tab. 9), the values are similar for the Salzofenhohle and the Drachenhohle, whereas no data from Willendorf are available. The tibia case represents again two distinct groups (Fig. 4; Tab. 10). The larger one includes specimens from Willendorf and Drachenhohle, the smaller one comes from Salzofenhohle. The sample from Divje babe I falls into dolžini vratu so te bodisi podobno velike bodisi manjše od tistih iz Willendorfa. Večina stopalnic iz Willendorfa je večja od tistih iz jame salzofen in je na zgornjem robu variacijske širine za recentne kozoroge oz. te celo presega. Glede na navedeno se zdi primerke iz jame salzofen utemeljeno pripisati samicam. Dolge kosti iz jame Salzofen (sl. 3-4; tab. 6-7in 9-10) oblikujejo enotno skupino razmeroma majhnih primerkov. podobno izstopajoča je po svoji majhnosti zgolj še ena izmed nadlahtnic iz Willendorfa, medtem ko imata ostanka enakega skeletnega elementa iz jam Drachen in Mokriške jame v tem smislu vmesno lego (sl. 3). Kar zadeva koželjnice, večina willendorfskih primerkov po velikosti močno presega tiste iz tukaj obravnavanega najdišča (tab. 7). Medtem ko pri stegnenicah ni opaznejših razlik med najdbami iz jam Salzofen in Drachen ni (tab. 9), pa tovrstni podatki za Willendorfžal manjkajo. Obstoj dveh velikostnih skupin je potrdila metrična analiza golenic (sl. 4; tab. 10); med večje 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 Depth of distal end (mm) / globina distalnega konca (mm) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Greatest depth distal (mm) / največja distataa globina (mm) ▼ Willendorf »Salzofen ■ Jama treh bratov O Divje babe Fig. 4: Distal breadth and depth of distal end of tibiae from Capra ibex (in mm). Data after Toškan (2007) and own data. Sl. 4: širina in globina distalnega konca golenice pri vrsti Capra ibex (v mm). Vir podatkov: Toškan (2007) ter lastni podatki. ▼ Willendorf • Salzofen "Potočkazijalka ♦Drachenhöhle Fig. 5: Distal breadth and greatest depth of distal end of metatarsi from Capra ibex (in mm). Sl. 5: širina in največja globina distalnega konca stopalnice pri vrsti Capra ibex (v mm). Tab. 11: Measurements of the pelvic bone from Capra ibex (in mm). Abbreviations: gl - greatest length; ls - length of symphysis; la - length of acetabulum including labium; sh - smallest height of ileum; sb - smallest breadth of ileum; lfo - inner length of foramen obturatum. Tab. 11: Velikost medenic pri vrsti Capra ibex (v mm). Kratice: ls - dolžina simfize; la - dolžina kolčne ponvice (acetabulum) vključno z obodom; sh - najmanjša višina črevnice; sb - najmanjša širina črevnice; lfo - notranja dolžina zadelane odprtine (foramen obturatum). Site / najdišče Inv. no or locality / inv. št. oz. lokaliteta gl ls la sh sb lfo Salzofenhöhle 1636 dex 33.7 18.8 12.3 50.0 1636 dex 33.2 19.3 12.3 1636 sin 32.4 19.4 11.0 44.0 1644 sin 34.2 21.5 13.1 1644 dex 33.3 1644 sin 20.5 11.5 1925-3 240.0 73.5 33.8 20.8 12.2 51.3 1925-3 240.0 72.3 32.3 18.4 12.4 46.9 Tab. 12: Measurements of metatarsals from Capra ibex (in mm). For abbreviations see tables 6 and 8. Tab. 12: Velikost stopalnic pri vrsti Capra ibex (v mm). Kratice: glej pripisa k tabelama 6 in 8. Site / najdišče Inv. no or locality / inv. št. oz. lokaliteta gl bp dp sd bd dd Salzofenhöhle 1635 sin 135.1 25.9 15.7 30.5 20.7 1635 dex 135.3 25.7 15.4 30.2 19.5 1635 sin 136.5 26.3 16.1 28.8 18.8 1635 sin 141.3 25.5 16.2 32.2 20.4 1909 143.8 27.7 18.4 33.2 21.8 1646 158.4 32.6 21.3 39.4 23.3 1635 26.2 15.4 31.3 20.7 Site / najdišče Inv. no or locality / inv. št. oz. lokaliteta gl bp dp sd bd dd 1910 26.7 17.3 28.8 18.8 Drachenhohle1 1635 151.2 28.3 24.5 18.5 34.0 21.8 Potočka zijalka Pz 36 162.0 29.5 25.2 21.2 35.8 22.3 Modern female2 n=12 116-141 21-26 20-23 13-16 26-31 17-20 Modern male2 n=23 131-156 25-30 21-25 15-20 26-36 18-22 1 after / po Sickenberg (1931) and own measurements / in lastni podatki, 2 after / po Bosold (1968) Tab. 13: Measurements of proximal phalanges from Capra ibex (in mm). For abbreviations see table 6. Tab. 13: Velikost prvih prstnic pri vrsti Capra ibex (v mm). Kratice: glej pripis k tabeli 6. Site / najdišče Inv. no or locality / inv. št. oz. lokaliteta element gl bp sd bd Salzofenhohle 1653 phal 1 ant 48.2 18.2 15.7 17.5 1651 dex phal 1 ant 43.7 17.2 15.1 16.6 1651 sin phal 1 ant 43.6 17.7 15.4 16.6 Jama pod Herkovimi pečmi1 phal 1 ant 44.4 15.0 14.6 Willendorf phal 1 ant 52.0 21.3 17.7 20.2 phal 1 ant 55.0 22.5 18.1 21.5 phal 1 post 51.1 18.6 16.5 18.6 phal 1 post 53.8 21.0 16.0 phal 1 post 52.0 20.3 18.1 Lukenjska jama2 phal 1 post ~39.0 ~13.0 12.5 modern3 male (n=21 ) phal 1 ant 41-50 16-21 12.5-17 15-20 modern3 female (n=12) phal 1 ant 36-45 14-18 11.5-14 13.5-17 modern3 male (n=21) phal 1 post 41-50 14-16 13-15 14-19 modern3 female (n=12) phal 1 post 37-44 13-16 12-15 10-13 1 after / po Pohar (1981), 2 after / po Pohar (1983), 3 after / po Bosold (1968) Tab. 14: Measurements of middle phalanges from Capra ibex (in mm). Abbreviations: glpe - greatest length at peripher side; for other abbreviations see table 6. Tab. 14: Velikost drugih prstnic pri vrsti Capra ibex (v mm). Kratice: glpe - največja dolžina na periferni strani; za ostale okrajšave glej pripis k tabeli 6. Site / najdišče Inv. no or locality / inv. št. oz. lokaliteta element glPe bp sd bd Salzofenhohle 1651 sin phal 2 ant 27.9 17.3 13.9 13.9 1651 sin phal 2 ant 27.4 17.1 13.5 13.9 1651 dex phal 2 ant 28.5 17.0 13.7 13.4 1651 dex phal 2 ant 26.8 17.1 13.4 13.8 1651 dex phal 2 post 28.1 15.1 12.3 11.8 1651 dex phal 2 post 27.4 14.9 12.1 11.6 1651 sin phal 2 post 27.3 15.0 12.2 11.8 1651 sin phal 2 post 27.9 14.7 12.1 11.1 Jama pod Herkovimi pečmi 1 phal 2 ant 33.1 16.9 15.3 Willendorf phal 2 32.1 20.0 16.8 phal 2 34.8 17.8 14.4 phal 2 34.6 20.0 Divje babe2 D.b.1162 phal 2 18.0 D.b.1317 phal 2 16.0 1 after / po Pohar (1981), 2 after / po Toškan (2007) Tab. 15: Measurements of astragali from Capra ibex (in mm). Abbreviations: gll - greatest length lateral; glm - greatest length medial; dl - depth lateral; dm - depth medial; bd - breadth distal. Tab. 15: Velikost skočnic pri vrsti Capra ibex (v mm). Kratice: gll - največja dolžina na lateralni strani; glm - največja dolžina na medialni strani; dl - globina na lateralni strani; dm - globina na medialni strani; bd - širina na distalnem koncu. Site / najdišče Inv. no or locality / inv. št. oz. lokaliteta gll glm dl dm bd Salzofenhöhle 1650 dex 38.1 36.3 21.3 21.0 25.4 1650 sin 38.8 23.0 23.5 26.5 Drachenhöhle* 39.2 38.0 21.7 21.8 27.4 Willendorf Wi-II-2 42.3 21.6 Wi-II-9 42.5 40.3 22.1 30.5 Poljšiška cerkev.1 ~38.0 25.8 *probably part of one complete juvenile individual / verjetno del ohranjenega okostja mlade živali, 1 after / po Pohar (1991) the smaller size group, with the subadult specimen being rather small in its distal depth. Measurements for pelvic bones from Salzofenhohle are given in table 11. The pelvis material from Willendorf is more fragmented and no meaningful measurements could be taken. Concerning the metatarsal bones the assemblage from Salzofenhöhle - generally speaking - forms a small-sized group with the exception of one metatarsal (Fig. 5). The size values of metatarsals fall clearly within the distribution range of values for modern female individuals (Tab. 12) given by Bosold (1968). The large specimen from Salzofenhöhle and the metatarsal from Potočka zijalka fall within the modern male group. Their greatest length even exceeds values given for modern males. Two proximal phalanges from Salzofenhöhle fall into the range of modern female individuals given by Bosold (1968) and one into the range of modern males. The sample from Willendorf clearly exceeds those values (Tab. 13). The material from Willendorf was measured again by the author, since the values published by The-nius (1959, 156) seem to be taken in a slightly different way. The middle phalanges from Willendorf are larger than those from Salzofenhöhle (Tab. 14). Few additional measurements are available from astragali and calcanei (Tabs. 15-16). In astragali, the sample from Willendorf is of larger size than the specimens from Salzofenhöhle. Tab. 16: Measurements of calcanei from Capra ibex (in mm). Abbreviations: gl - greatest length; gb - greatest breadth. Tab. 16: Velikost petnic pri vrsti Capra ibex (v mm). Kratici: gl - največja dolžina; gb - največja širina. Site / Inv. no or locality / gb najdišče inv. št. oz. lokaliteta gl Salzofenhöhle 1650 sin 71.3 25.4 1650 sin 74.8 27.1 Willendorf Wi-II-5 27.6 Wi-II-9 ~71.0 primerke sodijo tisti iz Willendorfa ter iz jame Drachen, medtem ko so oni iz najdišča Salzofenhöhle opazno manjši. K slednjim se umešča tudi vzorec iz Divjih bab I, pri čemer golenica subadultne živali izstopa po razmeroma majhni globini distalnega dela. Metrični podatki za ostanke medenice iz najdišča Salzofenhöhle so podani v tabeli 11. Primerjave z najdbami iz Willendorfa v tem primeru žal ni bilo mogoče opraviti, saj so te v zelo fragmentarnem stanju. podobno kot v primeru ostalih skeletnih elementov je bilo tudi z analizo stopalnic iz jame Salzofen ugotovljeno, da je te - z eno izjemo - mogoče združiti v enotno skupino razmeroma majhnih primerkov (sl. 5). Razpoložljivi metrični podatki se namreč lepo umeščajo v variacijsko širino za recentne samice, kot jo podaja Bosold (1968; tab. 12). Večji primerek iz jame Salzofen ter edini iz Potočke zijalke se po svojih dimenzijah ujemata s podatki za recentne samce, po največji dolžini pa te celo presegata. od treh izmerjenih prvih prstnic iz jame Salzofen se dve dimenzijsko ujemata s primerki recentnih samic (cf. Bosold 1968), ena pa s primerki recentnih samcev. Najdbe iz Willendorfa te vrednosti očitno presegajo (tab. 13). Naj k temu dodamo, da je bilo gradivo iz navedenega najdišča v okviru tukaj predstavljene študije podvrženo ponovnemu merjenju, saj naj bi Thenius (1959, 156) metrične podatke zajemal nekoliko drugače. Podobno kot pri prvih prstnicah tudi v primeru drugih najdbe iz Willendorfa po velikosti presegajo tiste iz jame Salzofen (tab. 14). Zajetih je bilo tudi nekaj dodatnih metričnih podatkov o skočnicah in petnicah (tab. 15-16). Pri skočnicah najdbe iz Willendorfa po velikosti presegajo tiste iz jame Salzofen. REZULTATI Tako mlajšepleistocenski kot tudi recentni primerki vrste C. ibex sestavljajo dve velikostni skupini, ki ju običajno povezujemo s samci in samicami. Primerjalni RESULTS Late Pleistocene and modern Capra ibex show two size groups commonly concluded as males and females. Comparative data from modern ibex were available for horn cores, metapodials and phalanges. The comparison of values shows that the fossil specimens lie at the upper range of size distribution in both males and females, and there is evidence of very large individuals during the Late Pleistocene that even exceed values of large modern males. Nonetheless, the number of specimens included in this study is too low to draw assured conclusions. Size differences between modern and fossil assemblages need to be studied in more detail. Because of the measured values, it is supposed that the assemblage from Salzofenhöhle consists mainly of female individuals, whereas the ibex remains from Willendorf are predominantly from males. Sexing of longbones is not clear for each single specimen due to a number of middle sized individuals in the studied assemblage. One metatarsus from Salzofenhöhle, the specimen from Potočka zijalka and Mokriška jama and a few bones from Drachenhöhle are close to the larger specimens from Willendorf. These specimens probably represent male individuals. In the absence of direct radiocarbon dates on the ibex material of the studied sites and due to the probable chronological heterogeneity of the cave assemblages, which may include Late Pleistocene as well as Holocene finds, more refined results are not possible. metrični podatki za recentne kozoroge so bili razpoložljivi v primeru rožnic, metapodijev in prstnic. Vzpo-rejanje obeh nizov podatkov je pokazalo, da se fosilni primerki umeščajo na zgornji rob variacijske širine za recentne živali tako pri samcih kot tudi pri samicah. Pri tem posamezni izrazito veliki fosilni ostanki dimenzije velikih recentnih samcev očitno presegajo. Seveda se je pri tem treba zavedati, da je tukaj predstavljena študija zajela zgolj pičlo število najdb; za pridobitev zanesljivejših podatkov o razlikah v velikosti med fosilnimi in recentnimi kozorogi bi bile tako nujne detajlnejše študije bogatejših vzorcev. Na podlagi razpoložljivih metričnih podatkov se sicer zdi, da med najdbami iz jame Salzofen prevladujejo kosti samic, medtem ko naj bi v Willen-dorfu prevladovali samci. v primeru nekaterih najdb tem zaradi "vmesnih" dimenzij ni bilo mogoče določiti spola. Največja stopalnica iz jame Salzofen, najdbi iz Potočke zijalke in Mokriške jame ter posamezne kosti iz jame Drachen se po svoji velikosti umeščajo k večjim primerkom iz Willendorfa. Te kosti gre najbrž pripisati samcem. Ovira na poti do detajlnejših rezultatov je domnevna kronološka heterogenost analiziranega gradiva, ki morda obsega najdbe tako mlajšepleistocenske kot tudi holocenske starosti. Pri tem je dodatna ovira tudi to, da do sedaj še ni bila opravljena nobena neposredna radiokarbonska datacija katere od kozorogovih najdb. RAZPRAVA Discussion Remains of ungulates in caves are present but often rare. As an important fact, different preservation patterns can be observed. Ungulates may be only presented by small skeletal elements (eg. carpals, tarsals, teeth), and heavily fragmented pieces often reveal gnaw marks and corrosion due to gastric acids. They may be either introduced by carnivores as their prey or were brought into the cave by human hunters and afterwards the bones were scavenged by carnivores. Spatial distribution analyses of bones and artefacts suggest Capra ibex as human hunting prey at Gamssulzenhöhle 1300 m a.s.l.), Upper Austria (Kühtreiber, Kunst 1995). At Nixloch-cave (770 m a.s.l.), Upper Austria, ungulates probably also correlate with the human use of this site although an input by carnivores is also possible, because of severe gnawing damage (Kunst 1992). The material of these two sites was recovered by modern excavations, while Salzofenhöhle and Drachenhöhle are "old roughly excavated sites". Because of the high selective sampling method, small skeletal elements were not collected. However, the material from these sites is much better preserved, with nearly all skeletal Ostanki kopitarjev so v jamskih najdiščih sicer prisotni, a njihovo število je povečini skromno. Samosvoj je tudi vzorec zastopanosti posameznih skeletnih elementov z očitno prevlado majhnih kosti (npr. zape-stne oz. nartne kosti, zobje), na odlomkih praviloma močno fragmentiranih večjih kosti pa so pogosto tudi odtisi zverskih zob oz. je vidna korozija zaradi delovanja želodčne kisline. V jamo so jih lahko prinesle zveri kot lasten plen, lahko pa je to storil tudi človek in so zveri do njih prišle šele naknadno. Prostorska porazdelitev kozorogovih najdb v jamskem najdišču Gamssulzenhöhle (1300 m n. m.) v Zgornji Avstriji je pokazala, da bi za njihovo kopičenje dejansko lahko bil odgovoren človek, ki naj bi jih tudi uplenil (Kuhtreiber, Kunst 1995). Enaka domneva je bila postavljena za jamsko najdišče Nixloch (770 m n. m.), ki prav tako leži v Zgornji Avstriji, čeprav bi številne močno obgrizene najdbe v tem primeru lahko razumeli tudi kot indic, da so jih tja prinesle zveri (Kunst 1992). Favnistično gradivo iz navedenih dveh najdišč je bilo pobrano med modernimi arheološko-paleonto-loškimi izkopavanji, medtem ko veljata jami Salzofen in Drachen za "na star, dokaj površen način izkopani najdišči". Čeprav zaradi selektivnega vzorčenja najdb ostanki manjših skeletnih elementov pogosto sploh niso bili pobrani, pa je gradivo iz navedenih dveh jamskih elements represented and a considerable number of complete long bones. The material from Salzofenhohle reveals clear traces of carnivore activity. Three humeri, four femora, three tibiae, two horn cores, and one pelvic bone show biting marks and spiral fractures. One tibia shows traces of rodent gnawing. With an intensity of 28 %, gnawing traces are rather frequent. There are no traces of damage due to gastric acids on the preserved small elements like phalanges. Evidence of a nearly complete juvenile skeleton at Drachenhöhle argues for a natural death in single cases, and the two skeletons found in the "Opferschaft" in salzofenhöhle represent natural trap victims. There is no proven evidence of human activity on the bones from the two sites with the exception of three horn cores from Salzofenhöhle revealing hacking marks by a metal tool and traces of fire of unknown origin. These specimens are modern ibex individuals. One of them shows bite impressions at the tip of the horn core. The observed modifications argue for heterogeneous material and the question of chronological position of the finds. Besides proven actual input, ibex is determined as Late Glacial / Early Holocene component of Alpine cave sites by direct dates. One conventional radiocarbon date for Capra ibex from Gamssulzenhöhle is 10,180 ± 160 BP (VRI-1327; Kühtreiber, Kunst 1995) and corresponds well to an AMS date from Neue Laubensteinbärenhöhle in Bavaria of 11,350 ± 50 BP (GrA-13377; Rosendahl, Grupe 2001). For the Swiss Alps, direct dated remains of ibex up to now fall into the Holocene period (e.g. Blättler et al. 1995; Imhof 2003; 2004). There are no direct radiocarbon dates for ibex from Slovenian and Italian Alpine sites. Ibex remains from the loess area are of Late Pleistocene age due to its presence in the Early Upper Palaeolithic context. So far, no Late Pleistocene ibex remains from Alpine sites are proved by direct dating. More direct dates would be needed to detect possible Late Pleistocene finds and to reconstruct the role of ungulates at high Alpine cave sites. Additional material is needed to test if the degree of size differences differs in various skeletal elements not only between the sexes but also between modern and fossil ibex populations. najdišč precej bolje ohranjeno, obsega najdbe praktično vseh skeletnih elementov, neprimerno znatnejše pa je tudi število celih dolgih kosti. Na mnogih (tj. 28 %) najdbah iz jame Salzofen so vidne sledi zverske aktivnosti. Odtisi zob in spiralni lomi so tako prisotni na treh nadlahtnicah, štirih stegnenicah, treh golenicah, dveh rožnicah ter eni medenici. Ob tem so bile na eni od golenic prepoznane tudi sledi glodanja s strani neznanega glodavca. Po drugi strani nobena od najdb manjših skeletnih elementov (npr. prstnice) ni kazala poškodb, ki bi nastale zaradi korozivnega delovanja želodčne kisline. Najdba skoraj celotnega skeleta mladega kozoroga v jami Drachen priča o posameznih primerih naravne smrti, medtem ko bi lahko okostji iz brezna žrtev ("Opferschaft") v jami Salzofen pripadali živalma, ki sta se ponesrečili pri padcu v brezno. Na gradivu iz navedene jame sicer ni opaziti nikakršnih sledi, ki bi se dale povezati s človekom. V tem smislu edino izjemo predstavljajo tri zgoraj že omenjene delno ožgane rožnice, na katerih so med drugim vidni urezi s kovinskim predmetom, eden od primerkov pa ima tudi obgrizen terminalni del. Glede na navedeno se zdi torej utemeljeno sklepati, da gre za ostanke recentnih kozorogov, kar le še podkrepljuje domnevo o kronološko heterogeni sestavi obravnavanega gradiva. Z izjemo dokazano recentnih vnosov lahko na podlagi peščice razpoložljivih neposrednih radiokarbonskih datacij gledamo na kozoroga kot na element alpskih jamskih tafocenoz poznoglacialne/zgodnjeholocenske starosti. Konvencionalno pridobljen radiokarbonski datum za eno od najdb vrste C. ibex iz jame Gamssulzen se tako s svojimi 10.180 ± 160 BP (VRI-1327; Kühtreiber, Kunst 1995) lepo ujema z AMS-datumom konspecifičnega primerka z bavarskega najdišča Neue Laubensteinbärenhöhle (tj. 11.350 ± 50 BP; GrA-13377; Rosendahl, Grupe 2001). Vse doslej pridobljene datacije za kozorogove ostanke iz švicarskih Alp sodijo v holocen (npr. Blättler et al. 1995; Imhof 2003; 2004), medtem ko tovrstnih podatkov za gradivo iz slovenskih oz. italijanskih Alp ni. Ostanki vrste C. ibex z območja puhlice so mlajšepleisto-censke starosti, o čemer priča njena prisotnost v zgodnjem mlajšem paleolitiku. Na takšno (tj. mlajšepleistocensko) starost sicer doslej še ni pokazal noben radiokarbonski datum, ki bi bil pridobljen neposredno z analizo katere od kozorogovih kosti z območja Alp. Za pridobitev zanesljivejših podatkov o eventualni prisotnosti mlajšepleistocenskih najdb vrste C. ibex v visokoalpskih jamskih najdiščih ter za boljše poznavanje vloge tam najdenih kopitarjev nasploh bi bilo tako nujno treba pridobiti dodatne neposredne radiokarbonske da-tacije. Jasnejši odgovor o obstoju razlik v velikosti med obema spoloma oz. med fosilnimi in recentnimi živalmi pa bi lahko dale tudi analize novih obsežnih vzorcev. Prevod: Borut Toškan REFERENCES I LITERATURA BAUER, K. and / in F. SPITZENBERGER 2001, Alpensteinbock Capra ibex Einneaus, 1758. - In / V: F. Spitzenberger (ed. / ur.), Die Säugetierfauna Österreichs, Grüne Reihe des Bundesministeriums für Eand-und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft 13, 753-765, Wien. BEÄTTEER, H., MOREE, PH., TRÜSSEE, M. and / in P. TRÜSSEE 1995, Holozäne Bären-, Steinbock- und Kleinwirbeltierfunde in einer Höhle der Nidwaldner Voralpen: Paläontologie und Ichnologie. - Mitteilungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft Luzern 34, 139-157. BOSOED, K. 1968, Geschlechts- und Gattungsunterschiede an Metapodien und Phalangen mitteleuropäischer Wildwiederkäuer. - Säugetierkundliche Mitteilungen 16/2, 93-153. BRODAR, S. and / in M. BRODAR 1983, Potočka zijalka, visokoalpska postaja aurignacienskih lovcev / Potočka zijalka, eine hochalpine Aurignacjägerstation. -Dela 1. razreda SAZU 24, Ejubljana. BRODAR, M. 1960, Die hochalpine AurignacStation Mokriška jama (1500 m). - V: G. Freund (ed. / ur.), Steinzeitfragen der Alten und Neuen Welt. Festschrift für Eothar Zotz, 99-115, Bonn. COUTURIER, M. 1962, Le Bouquetin des Alpes. -Grenoble. DÖPPES, D. 2001, Gulo gulo (Mustelidae, Mam-malis) im Jungpleistozän Mitteleuropas. - Beiträge zur Paläontologie 26, 1-95. DöPPES, D., C. FRANK, G. RABEDER and / in C. REISINGER 1997, Salzofenhöhle. - In / V: D. Döp-pes, G. Rabeder (eds. / ur.), Pliozäne und pleistozäne Faunen Österreichs, Mitteilungen der Kommission für Quartärforschung der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 10, 213-218, Wien. DRIESCH, A. von den 1976, Das Vermessen von Tierknochen aus Vor- und Frühgeschichtlicher Zeit. -München. EHRENBERG, K. 1949, Berichte über Ausgrabungen in der Salzofenhöhle im Toten Gebirge. IV. Die Sichtung des Fundmaterials im oberösterreichischen Eandesmuseum. - Anzeiger der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse 1949/1, 43-46. EHRENBERG, K. 1956, Berichte über die Ausgrabungen in der Salzofenhöhle im Toten Gebirge. IX. Die Grabungen 1956 und ihre einstweiligen Ergebnisse. - Anzeiger der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse 1956/13, 149-153. EHRENBERG, K. 1964, Berichte über Ausgrabungen in der Salzofenhöhle im Toten Gebirge. XVI. Grabungen und Forschungsergebnisse 1963. - Anzeiger der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse 1964I3, 55-73. EHRENBERG, K. 1965, Berichte über Ausgrabungen in der Salzofenhöhle im Toten Gebirge XVII. Grabungen und Ergebnisse der Salzofen-Expedition 1964. - Anzeiger der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse 102I4, 72-89. FLADERER, F. 1997, Drachenhöhle bei Mixnitz. -In I V: D. Döppes, G. Rabeder (eds. I ur.), Pliozäne und pleistozäne Faunen Österreichs, Mitteilungen der Kommission für Quartärforschung der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 10, 295-304, Wien. GRIGGO, C. 1991, Le Bouquetin de Malarnaud (Ariège); implications paléobiogéographiques. - Quaternaire 2, 76-82. IMHOF, W. 2003, Milchbalm-Höhle. Holozäne Knochen von Rothirsch, Steinbock und Braunbär (Muotathal, SZ). - Stalactite 53I1, 26-29. IMHOF, W. 2004, Die Bärenfalle in der Vorderen Silberenalp, Muotatal (SZ). - Stalactite 54I1, 13-16. KUNST, G. K., 1992, Großsäugerreste aus dem Nixloch bei Losenstein-Ternberg, O.ö. - In I V: D. Nagel, G. Rabeder (eds. I ur.), Das Nixloch bei Losenstein-Ternberg, Mitteilungen der Kommission für Quartärforschung der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 8, 83-127. KÜHTREIBER, TH. and I in G. K. KUNST 1995, Das Spätglazial in der Gamssulzenhöhle im Toten Gebirge (Oberösterreich) - Artefakte, Tierreste, Fundschichtbildung. - In I V: G. Rabeder (ed. I ur.), Die Gamssulzenhöhle im Toten Gebirge, Mitteilungen der Kommission für Quartärforschung der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 9, 83-120. MOTTL, M. 1950, Die paläolithischen Funde aus der Salzofenhöhle. - Archaeologia Austriaca 5, 24-34. NIGST, P. R., T. BENCE VIOLA, P. HAESAERTS and I in G. TRNKA 2008, Willendorf II. - Wissenschaftliche Mitteilungen aus dem Niederösterreichischen Landesmuseum 19, 31-58 PACHER, M. and I in A. J. STUART 2009, Extinction chronology and paleoecology of the cave bear Ursus spelaeus. - Boreas 38I2, 189-206. PACHER, M., V. POHAR and I in G. RABEDER (eds. I ur.) 2004, Potočka zijalka. Palaeontological and archaeological results ofthe campaigns 1997-2000. -Mitteilungen der Kommission für Quartärforschung der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 13. - Wien. POHAR, V. 1981, Pleistocenska favna iz Jame pod Herkovimi pečmi. (La fauna pléistocène de la cavité de Jama pod Herkovimi pečmi.) - Geologija. Razprave in poročila 24I2, 241-284. POHAR, v. 1983, Poznoglacialna favna iz Lukenjske jame. (La fauna tardiglaciaire de la grotte de Lukenjska jama.) - Geologija. Razprave in poročila 26, 71-107. POHAR, v. 1991, Poznowürmska sesalska favna iz previsa Poljšiška cerkev. (Late Würm mammalian fauna from the locality of Poljšiška cerkev.) - Raprave 4. razreda SAZU 32/9, 315-339. POHAR, v. 1993, Fosilni alpski kozorog iz Prodne jame pri Trbonjah blizu Dravograda (Slovenija). (Fossil Ibex from the gravel pit at Trbonje near Dravograd (Slovenija).) - Razprave 4. razreda SAZU34/5, 117-127. RAKOVEC, I. 1940, Diluvialni kozorogi Slovenije in Dalmacije. - Razprave matematično- prirodoslovnega razreda AZU 1, 55-76. RAKOVEC, I. 1958, Pleistocenski sesalci iz jame pri črnem kalu. (The Pleistocene mammalia from the cave črni Kal in northern Istria.) - Razprave 4. razreda SAZU 4, 365-433. ROSENDAHL, W. and / in G. GRUPE 2001, Mittelwürmzeitliche Höhlenbären und ihre Nahrungspräferenz. Forschungen aus der Neuen LaubensteinBärenhöhle/Chiemgau. - Mitteilungen der Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Historische Geologie 41, 85-91. SICKENBERG, O. 1931, Die Großsäugetiere der Begleitfauna. - In / V: O. Abel, G. Kyrle (eds. / ur.), Die Drachenhöhle bei Mixnitz, Speläologische Monographien 7-8, 747-762, Wien. THENIUS, E. 1959, Die jungpleistozäne Wirbeltierfauna von Willendorf i. d. Wachau, N.Ö. - In / V: F. Felgenhauer (ed. / ur.), Willendorf in der Wachau. Monographie derPaläolith-Fundstellen I-VII. 1. Teil, Mitteilungen der Prähistorischen Kommission der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 8-9, 133-170. TOŠKAN, B. 2007, Ostanki velikih sesalcev iz Divjih bab I: stratigrafija, taksonomija in biometrija / Remains of large mammals from Divje babe I - Stratigraphy, taxonomy and biometry. - In / V: I. Turk (ed. / ur.), Divje Babe I. Paleolitsko najdišče mlajšega pleistocena v Sloveniji. 1. del: Geologija in paleontologija / Divje Babe I. Upper Pleistocene Palaeolithic site in Slovenia. Part I: Geology and Palaeontology, Opera Instituti Archaeologici Sloveniae 13, 221-278, Ljubljana. OSTANKI MAMUTOVEGA OKLA IZ PRODNE JAME KAMNICA PRI DRNOVEM V KRŠKI KOTLINI THE MAMMOTH TUSK REMAINS FROM THE KAMNICA GRAVEL PIT NEAR DRNOVO IN THE KRKA RIVER BASIN Jernej PAVŠIČ, Vasja MIKUŽ Izvleček Znova sta predstavljena dva večja dela trobčarjevega okla, ki sta bila najdena v prodni jami Kamnica pri Drnovem v Krški kotlini. Po velikosti in morfoloških značilnostih okla, strukturnih posebnostih zobovine in starosti prodnega zasipa reke Save ostanke okla pripisujemo mlajšepleistocenski vrsti Mammuthus primigenius (Blumenbach). Najdbe te vrste so na širšem območju Krške kotline izredno redke. Ključne besede: okel, mamut, mlajši pleistocen, prodna jama Kamnica, Drnovo, Krška kotlina Abstract The two larger parts of the mammoth tusk that were discovered in the Kamnica gravel pit near Drnovo in the Krka river basin are presented once again. Taking into account the size and morphologic characteristics of the tusk, the structural characteristics of the dentine and the age of the gravel deposit of the Save river, the tusk remains are ascribed to the Late Pleistocene species Mammuthus primigenius (Blumenbach). Such finds are extremely rare in the broader area of the Krka river basin. Keywords: tusk, mammoth, Late Pleistocene, Kamnica gravel pit, Drnovo, Krka river basin UVOD v paleontološki zbirki Oddelka za geologijo Univerze v Ljubljani sta že dolgo razstavljena dva večja fragmenta mamutovega okla. Najdba je iz prodne jame Kamnica pri Drnovem v Krški kotlini (sl. 1). Zgornji rob prodne jame Kamnica je na nadmorski višini 159 m. Ostanka okla sta bila najdena nekaj metrov nižje, na desnem robu ali pobočju prodne jame, v desetletju med 1970 in 1980, najverjetneje pa v letu 1976. Na ostanke mamutovega okla nas je opozoril arheolog dr. Mitja Guštin, ki je bil takrat še kustos muzeja v Brežicah. Ko smo si najdbi ogledali, smo že vedeli, da gre za ostanke mamutovega okla. Ostanki mamuta so v Sloveniji zelo redki, iz Krške kotline pa še toliko bolj. Ostanka okla iz Kamnice sta že bila predstavljena (Lenardic, Pohar 1995), vendar smo se znova odločili za njuno doku- INTRODUCTION The Palaeontology collection at the Department of Geology, University of Ljubljana, has had two large mammoth tusk fragments on display for quite a while now. The find originates from the Kamnica gravel pit near Drnovo in the Krka river basin (Fig. 1). The upper edge of the Kamnica gravel pit stands at 159 metres above sea level. In the 1970s (most likely in 1976) the tusk remains were discovered a few meters lower, on the right edge or slope of the gravel pit. The mammoth tusk was brought to our attention by the archaeologist Phd Mitja Guštin, who was a curator at the Brežice museum at the time. As soon as we laid our eyes on the finds we knew that we were dealing with the remains of a mammoth tusk. Mammoth remains are very rare in Slovenia and even more so in the Krka river basin. Even Sl. 1: Geografski položaj najdišča mamutovega okla v prodni jami Kamnica pri Drnovem. Fig. 1: Geographical position of site of the mammoth tusk in Kamnica gravel pit at Drnovo. mentiranje zaradi konkretnejših podatkov o starosti terase in njenih sedimentih, geološke zgradbe okolice najdišča in drugih dopolnilnih merskih podatkov. Tako je omogočena boljša časovna umestitev najdbe v prostor. DOSEDANJE NAJDBE IN RAZISKAVE OSTANKOV MAMUTA V KRŠKI KOTLINI Najdišča mamutovih ostankov v Krški kotlini in na njenem obrobju so zelo redka. Večina raziskovalcev omenja ostanke mamuta iz najdišča Kostanjevica na Krki, ki so ga odkrili med letoma 1936 in 1938. Tam so bili najdeni deli mamutovega okla, posamezne zobne lamele in kosti metapodijev. Med prvimi, ki sta opisala te najdbe, sta Rakovec (1954; 1973) in Brodar (1955), medtem ko Osole (1955-1956) in Ramovš (1974) samo omenjata najdbe mamuta iz tega najdišča. Tudi Pleničar in Premru (1977, 32) pišeta o najdbah ostankov mamuta iz mlajših wurmskih plasti Kostanjevice ob Krki in navajata, da so jih raziskovali Rakovec v letu 1954, Brodar 1955. leta in Šercelj v letu 1963. Lenardiceva in Poharjeva (1995, 138, t. 2, sl. 1) sta prvi, ki sta predstavili ostanke mamutovega okla iz prodne jame Kamnica, ki so shranjeni v šolski paleontološki zbirki Oddelka za geologijo. Merski podatki Lenardiceve in Poharjeve (1995) so pomanjkljivi in zavajajoči, saj so v tabeli 4 podani podatki za samo en del okla, na tabli 2, sliki 1, pa sta prikazana dva dela istega okla. Torej sta na merske podatke drugega dela okla pozabili? Mikuž (2007, 162) samo omenja ostanke mamutovega okla iz Kamnice v Krški kotlini. though the tusk remains from Kamnica have already been presented (Lenardic, Pohar 1995), we decided to document them once more due to the new data as regards the age of the terrace and its sediments, the geological pattern of the site surroundings and other additional data. This provided us with the opportunity to more precisely position the finds into the space. THE FINDS SO FAR AND THE RESEARCH OF THE MAMMOTH REMAINS IN THE KRKA RIVER BASIN Sites with mammoth remains are very rare in the Krka river basin and its surroundings. Most researches mention the mammoth remains from the site Kostanjevica na Krki, which was discovered between 1936 and 1938. This location revealed parts of a mammoth tusk, individual dental lamellas and metapode bones. One of the first to describe them were Rakovec (1954; 1973) and Brodar (1955). Osole (1955-1956) and Ramovš (1974) merely mention the mammoth finds at this site. Pleničar and Premru (1977, 32) also wrote about the mammoth remains discovered in the Late Würm layers at Kostanjevica na Krki and stated that they were researched by Rakovec in 1954, Brodar in 1955 and Šercelj in 1963. Lenardic and Pohar (1995, 138, T. 2, Fig. 1) were the first to present the remains of the mammoth tusk from the Kamnica gravel pit that are kept in the school Pal-aeontological collection at the Department of Geology. The metric data provided by Lenardic and Pohar (1995) is incomplete and misleading, as the data provided in table 4 belongs to a single part of the tusk, and plate 2, Fig. 1 depicts two parts of the same tusk. Does this mean that they forgot to give us the metric data for the second part of the tusk? Mikuž (2007, 162) merely mentions the remains of the mammoth tusk from Kamnica in the Krka river basin. THE GEOLOGY STRATA OF THE DRNOVO SURROUNDINGS Drnovo lies on Quaternary sediments and sediment rocks. On the Basic geologic map for Novo mesto pleničar et al. (1976) marked that Holocene gravel and sand cover the surface of the Drnovo surroundings. The map also depicts a number of terrace sections. The tusk find most likely originates from the lower lying pleistocene gravel deposits. Pleničar and Premru (1977, 33) mention a belt of gravel alluvium between Malo Mraševo and Drnovo. In the south part of this belt one can find gravel deposited by the river Krka and on the north that of the river Sava. In the tectonic sense the site is in the area of the late Krka river depression or the Krka river syncline (Pleničar, Premru 1977, 36). In GEOLOŠKA ZGRADBA OKOLICE DRNOVEGA Drnovo je zgrajeno oziroma leži na kvartarnih sedimentih in sedimentnih kamninah. Na Osnovni geološki karti lista Novo mesto so Pleničar et al. (1976) na površju okolice Drnovega označili holocenski prod in pesek. Na karti je vrisanih tudi več terasnih odsekov. Najdba okla najverjetneje izvira iz nižje ležečih pleisto-censkih prodnih nanosov. Pleničar in Premru (1977, 33) omenjata pas prodnih naplavin med Malim Mraševim in Drnovim. V južnem delu omenjenega pasu je prod reke Krke, na severu pa Save. V tektonskem smislu je najdišče na območju mlade krške udorine oziroma krške sinklinale (Pleničar, Premru 1977, 36). Nadalje ista avtorja pišeta, da je prod Krke drobnejši in bolj pravilno zaobljen, medtem ko je savski prod zelo različnih velikosti. Iz teh skladov ne omenjajo nobene favne. Šikič et al. (1978) so kvartarne plasti v podaljšku Krške udorine razdelili na območja treh savskih teras (a1-a3). Najvišjo pleistocensko teraso (a3) sestavljajo apnenčevi konglomerati, holocensko srednjo (a2) in najnižjo (a1) pa konglomerati proda, peska in gline. Neposredno ob Savi so označene aluvijalne naplavine. Šikič et al. (1979) pri opisih pleistocenskih skladov na območju krške udorine ne omenjajo nikakršnih najdb ostankov mamuta. Verbič (2004; 2005) prikazuje in ponazarja, da so severno in severovzhodno od Drnovega holocenski zasipi in holocenske erozijske površine. Samo Drnovo in območje, ki leži severozahodno in južno od njega, pa sestavljajo velike zasipne površine, ki pripadajo Drnovski aloformaciji. V bistvu gre za zgornjepleistocensko savsko teraso ali zasip, katere starost je ocenjena od 16.000 do 18.000 let pred sedanjostjo. PALEONTOLOSKI DEL Sistematika po: Maier (1993); Lenardič, Pohar (1995) Red Proboscidea Illiger, 1811 Družina Elephantidae Gray, 1821 Poddružina Elephantinae Gill, 1872 Rod Mammuthus Burnett, 1830 Vaufrey (1958) mamute uvršča v podred Elephan-toidea Osborn 1921, nadalje k družini Elephantidae Gray 1821 in poddružini Elephantinae Bonaparte 1858 ter k rodu Elephas Linné 1758. Vaufrey (1958, 260) vrsto Elephas primigenius Blumenbach pripisuje k posebni skupini rodu Mammuthus Burnett 1830. Ob tem zapiše (Vaufrey 1958, 270), da je bila ta vrsta mamuta značilna za pleistocen Evrope in Azije. Thenius (1969) uvršča mamute k večji skupini pro-boscidov Elephantoidea in podrobneje še k manjši družini Elephantidae. Pri tem zanje uporablja rodovno ime the continuation both authors wrote that the Krka river gravel is smaller and more rounded, while the gravel from the Sava river can be found in different sizes. No fauna from these layers is mentioned. Šikič et al. (1978) have divided the Quaternary layers in the continuation of the Krka river depression into three Sava river terraces (a1-a3). The highest lying Pleistocene terrace (a3) is composed from lime conglomerates. The middle, Holocene one (a2) is composed from gravel and sand while the lowest (a1) is composed from gravel, sand and clay. Alluvial sediments are marked next to the Sava river. In their descriptions of the Pleistocene layers in the area of the Krka river depression Šikič et al. (1979) did not mention any mammoth remains. Verbič (2004; 2005) indicated that there were Holocene deposits and Holocene erosion surfaces to the north and northeast of Drnovo. Drnovo and the area that lies to the northwest and south of it are large deposit surfaces that belong to the Drnovo alloformation. This is an Upper Pleistocene Sava terrace or deposit that is believed to be approximately between 16,000 and 18,000 years old. PALAEONTOLOGICAL PART classification according to: Maier (1993) and Lenardic, Pohar (1995) Order Proboscidea Illiger, 1811 Family Elephantidae Gray, 1821 Subfamily Elephantinae Gill, 1872 Genus Mammuthus Burnett, 1830 Vaufrey (1958) placed mammoths into the subordo Elephantoidea Osborn 1921, family Elephantidae Gray 1821, subfamily Elephantinae Bonaparte 1858 and genus Elephas Linné 1758. Vaufrey (1958, 260) classifies the species Elephas primigenius Blumenbach as a special group of the genus Mammuthus Burnett 1830. Vaufrey (1958, 270) wrote that this mammoth species was characteristic of the European and Asian Pleistocene. Thenius (1969) categorised mammoths into the larger group of proboscid Elephantoidea and more detailed into the smaller Elephantidae family. Thenius (1969, 608 f) used the genus name Mammonteus, which is supposedly a synonym for the genus Mammuthus. The species Mammuthus primigenius is believed to be typical for the Late Pleistocene in Europe. Âbelova, one of the few researchers to quote the sixth reprint of Blumenbach's work (2008, 231), researched the structure of the mammoth tusks. From this edition we can learn that Blumenbach defined the species Mammuthus primigenius in 1799 and not in 1803 as most researchers (including Lenardic and Pohar, even though they do not state any work by Blumenbach) state. Mammonteus, ki naj bi bilo sinonim rodu Mammuthus (Thenius 1969, 608 s). Vrsta Mammuthus primigenius naj bi bila po njegovem mnenju značilna za mlajši pleistocen v Evropi. Abelova (2008) je raziskovala strukturo mamu-tovih oklov in je ena izmed redkih raziskovalcev, ki citirajo šesto izdajo Blumenbachovega dela (cf. Abelova 2008, 231). odtod izvemo, da je Blumenbach vrsto Mammuthus primigenius določil leta 1799 in ne leta 1803, kot navaja večina raziskovalcev, z Lenardičevo in Poharjevo vred, čeprav sicer ne navajata nobenega Blumenbachovega dela. po našem mnenju je tudi ta letnica določitve vrste (tj. 1799) sporna, saj Thenius (1969, 638) med svojimi citati uporabljenih virov navaja četrto izdajo Blumenbachovega dela z letnicama 1791 in 1797. V delu Theniusa sicer podatka o konkretni letnici določitve vrste Mammuthus primigenius ne naj demo. Prava letnica avtorstva vrste ostaja torej še vedno vprašljiva, zato je ne bomo uporabili. Mammuthus primigenius (Blumenbach) T. 1: 1, 2a-2b; t. 2: 1, 2a-2b 1884 Elephas primigenius Blumb. - Gorjanovič-Kramberger, 23 1895 Elephas primigenius Blumb. - Zittel, 852, sl. 1912-1913 1912 Elephas primigenius Blumenbach. - Gorjano-vič-Kramberger, 21 1960 Mammuthus primigenius Blumenbach - Ter-mier, H. in G., 452, sl. 3323-3324 1995 Mammuthus primigenius (Blumenbach), 1803 - Lenardič, Pohar, 138, tab. 2, sl. 1. In our opinion even the year 1799 should be placed under question (as the year in which the species was described) for in his quotes of used sources Thenius (1969, 638) referes to the fourth edition of blumenbach's work printed in 1791 and 1797. Thenius' work does not provide data on an actual year in which the species Mammuthus primigenius was described. As the true year in which the species was established remains questionable it will not be used in this text. Mammuthus primigenius (Blumenbach) Pl. 1: 1, 2a-2b; Pl. 2: 1, 2a-2b 1884 Elephas primigenius Blumb. - Gorjanovič-Kramberger, 23 1895 Elephas primigenius Blumb. - Zittel, 852, Figs. 1912, 1913 1912 Elephas primigenius Blumenbach. - Gorjanovič-Kramberger, 21 1960 Mammuthus primigenius Blumenbach - Ter-mier, H. & G., 452, Figs. 3323-3324 1995 Mammuthus primigenius (Blumenbach), 1803 - Lenardič, Pohar, 138, Pl. 2, Fig. 1 MATERIAL Two large parts of the mammoth tusk, i.e. specimens 1 and 2 (Pl. 1-2) were discovered in the Kamnica gravel pit near Drnovo. The tusk remains from the Krka river basin are currently kept in the display case of the Palaeontological collection of the Department of Geology, Faculty of natural sciences and engineering, University of Ljubljana, at Privoz 11 in Ljubljana. MATERIAL Dva večja dela mamutovega okla oziroma primerka 1 in 2 (t. 1 in t. 2) sta iz prodne jame Kamnica pri Drno-vem. Ostanka okla iz Krške kotline sta danes shranjena v vitrini paleontološke zbirke Oddelka za geologijo Naravoslovnotehniške fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani, na Privozu 11 v Ljubljani. OPIS NAjDB ostanki okla so bili v zelo slabem, zmehčanem in fragmentiranem stanju. Vsi deli mamutovega zoba so bili kasneje impregnirani in primerno restavrirani ter sestavljeni oziroma zlepljeni v dve večji celoti. Vsem fragmentom ni bilo mogoče najti ustreznega mesta. Oba ostanka kažeta v preseku ovalno obliko (t. 2: 1) v vzdolžni smeri pa rahlo ukrivljenost (t. 1-2: 2a-b). V bistvu sta sestavna dela istega okla, vendar brez vmesnih DESCRIPTION OF FINDS The tusk remains are in a very poor, fragmented and softened state. All parts of the mammoth tooth were treated and appropriately restored and then glued into two larger parts, however not all fragments could be placed. both remains have an oval cross-section (Pl. 2: 1) and a slight curve lengthwise (Pl. 1 -2: 2a-2b). Both parts belong to the same tusk, but the parts in between are missing. The first example is somewhat longer but has a slightly smaller circumference (Pl. 1: 2a-2b) and thus belongs to the more frontal (mesial) part, while the second example is shorter and has a larger circumference (Pl. 2: 2a-2b) and thus represents the continuation of the frontal or first part, and therefore belongs closer to the back (distal) part of the tusk. On the surfaces of the cross sections we can observe the characteristic (for mammoths and other proboscides) 'Schreger structural pattern' (Pl. 1: 1), which is discussed and presented in Tab. 1: Dimenzije obeh ostankov mamutovega okla (1 in 2) iz prodne jame Kamnica pri Drnovem v Krški kotlini. Tab. 1: Dimensions of both specimens of mammoth tusk (1 and 2) from Kamnica gravel pit at Drnovo in Krka river basin. Glavni merski parametri dveh delov mamutovega okla / The main parameters of two parts of mammoth tusk Primerek 1 / Specimen 1 (t. 1: 2a-2b) Primerek 2 / Specimen 2 (t. 2: 1, 2a-2b) Dolžina ostankov okla / length of tusk remains 540 mm 510 mm Večji premer Greater diameter 168 mm 250 mm Manjši premer / Smaller diameter 143 mm 159 mm Večji obseg okla / Greater extent of tusk 540 mm 610 mm Manjši obseg okla / Smaller extent of tusk 485 mm 580 mm odprtina na sredini okla / Aperture in the centre of tusk - 55 x 30 mm elementov, ki manjkajo. Prvi primerek, ki je nekoliko daljši del okla, vendar z manjšim obsegom (t. 1: 2a-b) in po položaju pripada bolj sprednjemu (mezialnemu) delu, drugi primerek ali krajši del z večjim obsegom (t. 2: 2a-b) je nadaljevanje sprednjega ali prvega dela, torej je bližje zadnjemu (distalnemu) delu okla. Na površinah prečnih presekov mamutovega okla lahko opazimo za mamute in ostale proboscide zelo značilen "Schregerjev strukturni vzorec" (t. 1: 1), ki ga temeljito obravnava in nazorno predstavlja Abelova (2008) na vzorcih iz Moravske na Češkem in Hrvaške. great detail by Abelova (2008) on the samples from Moravsko (Czech Republic) and Croatia. Gorjanovic-Kramberger (1884; 1912) wrote that in the territory of former Yugoslavia the mammoth lived mainly in the lowland areas surrounding the Sava, Drava and Danube rivers and that their remains are relatively common. CONCLUSIONS Gorjanovic-Kramberger (1884; 1912) piše, da je mamut živel na območju bivše jugoslavije predvsem v nižinskih predelih rek Save, Drave in Donave in da so njegovi ostanki razmeroma pogostni. SKLEPI Prodna jama Kamnica pri Drnovem je bila izkopana na zgornjepleistocenski savski terasi, katere starost je ocenjena na 16.000 do 18.000 let pred sedanjostjo (Verbič 2004; 2005). V produ jame so tedanji delavci leta 1976 našli ostanke okla večjega trobčarja. Po dimenzijah zobnih ostankov (predvsem po obsegu okla), določenih strukturnih značilnostih zobovine in starosti sedimenta sklepamo, da dela okla pripadata mlajšeplei-stocenski vrsti Mammuthus primigenius (Blumenbach). oba fragmenta sta predstavljena v tem prispevku na tabli 1 in 2. Na manjših površinah prečnega preseka okla (t. 1: 1) je na dentinu opaziti izrazit "Schregerjev strukturni vzorec", ki je po Abelovi (2008) zelo značilen predvsem za zobovino mamutovih oklov. The Kamnica gravel pit near Drnovo was excavated on the late Pleistocene Sava river terrace, which is estimated to be between 16,000 and 18,000 years old (Verbic 2004; 2005). In 1976 the workers working in this gravel pit found the remains of a tusk belonging to a larger Proboscidea. Taking the dimensions of the tooth remains (especially the circumference of the tusk) the certain structural characteristics of the dentine and the age of the sediment into account we assumed that the parts of the tusk belong to the late Pleistocene species Mammuthus primigenius (Blumenbach). both fragments are presented in this paper in plates 1 and 2. On the smaller surfaces of the cross section (Pl. 1: 1) the dentine shows a clearly visible 'Schreger structural pattern, which is - according to Äbelovä (2008) - characteristic for the dentine belonging to mammoth tusks. To our knowledge the Kamnica gravel pit near Dr-novo is the second site with registered mammoth remains in the Krka river basin and its edge. The first and much Kolikor nam je znano, je prodna jama Kamnica pri Drnovem drugo najdišče z registriranimi ostanki mamuta v Krški kotlini in na njenem obrobju. Prvo in veliko bolj znano najdišče z mamutovimi ostanki je arheološko in paleontološko najdišče Kostanjevica na Krki. Zahvale Ob tej priložnosti se zahvaljujemo profesorju arheologije dr. Mitju Guštinu, ki nas je opozoril na najdbo mamutovega okla, in za takrat podarjene mamutove ostanke šolski paleontološki zbirki Oddelka za geologijo. Sodelavcu Marijanu Grmu se zahvaljujemo za vso drugo tehniško in fotografsko podporo. better known site with mammoth remains is the archaeological and Palaeontological site Kostanjevica na Krki. Acknowledgment We would like to take this opportunity to thank dr. Mitja Guštin, professor of archaeology, for drawing our attention to the mammoth tusk find and the mammoth remains that were donated to the school Palaeontological collection at the Department of Geology. We would also like to thank our co-worker Marijan Grm for all the technical and photographic support he provided. Translation: Sunčan Patrick Stone LITERATURA I REFERENCES ÂBELOVÂ, M. 2008, Schreger pattern analysis of Mammuthus primigenius tusk: analytical approach and utility. - Bulletin Geosciences 83I2, 22S-232. BRODAR, S. 19SS, Kostanjevica ob Krki, paleolitska postaja na planem (Kostanjevica sur Krka, station paléolithique en plein aire). - Razprave IV. razreda SAZU 3, 43-462. GORJANOVIČ-KRAMBERGER, D. 1884, Fosilni sisari Hrvatske, Slavonije i Dalmacije. - Rad Jugoslaven-ske akademije znanosti i umjetnosti 69, Zagreb. GORJANOVIČ-KRAMBERGER, D. 1912, Fosilni proboscidi Hrvatske i Slavonije. - Djela Jugoslavenske akademije znanosti i umjetnosti 21, Zagreb. LENARDIČ, J. in I and V. POHAR 199S, O fosilnih najdbah vrste Mammuthus primigenius (Blumenbach) v Sloveniji (On fossil findings of the species Mammuthus primigenius (Blumenbach) on the territory of Slovenia). - Razprave IV. razreda SAZU 36I7, 129-1S1. MAIER, W. 1993, Klassifikation der Vertebrata. - V I In: R. L. Carroll (ur. I ed.), Paläontologie und Evolution der Wirbeltiere, S81-636, Stuttgart, New York. MIKUŽ, V. 2007, Prva najdba mamuta v Prekmur-ju, severnovzhodna Slovenija (The first find of mammoth in Prekmurje, Northeast Slovenia). - Razprave IV. razreda SAZU 48I1, 1S7-177. OSOLE, F. 19SS-19S6, O zobeh slonov. - Proteus 18, 109-112. PLENIČAR, M. in I and U. PREMRU 1977, Tolmač za list Novo mesto, Osnovna geološka karta 1:100 000. -Beograd. PLENIČAR, M., U. PREMRU in I and M. HERAK 1976, Osnovna geološka karta SFRJ 1:100 000, Novo mesto. - Beograd. RAKOVEC, I. 19S4, O fosilnih slonih iz Slovenije. - Razprave IV. razreda SAZU 2, 21S-27S. RAKOVEC, I. 1973, Razvoj kvartarne sesalske favne v Sloveniji (Über quartäre Säugetierfaunen Sloweniens (NW Jugoslawien)). - Arheološki vestnik 24, 22S-270. RAMOVŠ, A. 1974, Paleontologija. - Ljubljana. ŠIKIČ, K., O. BASCH in I and A. ŠIMUNIČ 1978, Osnovna geološka karta SFRJ Zagreb 1:100 000. - Beograd. ŠIKIČ, K., O. BASCH in I and A. ŠIMUNIČ 1979, Tumač za list Zagreb, Osnovna geološka karta 1:100 000. - Beograd. TERMIER, H. in I and G. TERMIER 1960, Paléontologie stratigraphique. - Paris. THENIUS, E. 1969, Phylogenie der Mammalia. Stammesgeschichte der Säugetiere (einschliesslich der Hominiden). - Berlin. VAUFREY, R. 19S8, Proboscidea, étude systématique. - V I In: J. Piveteau, Traité de Paléontologie VII2, 203-29S, Paris. VERBIČ, T. 2004, Stratigrafija kvartarja in neotek-tonika vzhodnega dela Krške kotline. 1. del: Stratigrafija (Quaternary stratigraphy and neotectonics of the Eastern Krško Basin. Part 1: Stratigraphy). - Razprave IV. razreda SAZU 4SI3, 171-22S. VERBIČ, T. 200S, Stratigrafija kvartarja in neotek-tonika vzhodnega dela Krške kotline. 2. del: Neotekto-nika (Quaternary stratigraphy and neotectonics of the Eastern Krško Basin. Part 2: Neotectonics). - Razprave IV. razreda SAZU 46I1, 171-216. ZITTEL, K. A. von 189S, Grundzüge der Palaeon-tologie (Palaeozoologie) VIII. - München, Leipzig. T. 1: 1 - Mammuthus primigenius (Blumenbach); primerek 2, prečni presek oklove površine s "Schregerjevim strukturnim vzorcem", prodna jama Kamnica pri Drnovem v Krški kotlini, velikost izseka 90 x 78 mm; 2a-b - Mammuthus primigenius (Blumenbach); primerek 1, sprednji del okla z leve in desne strani, prodna jama Kamnica pri Drnovem v Krški kotlini, dolžina ostanka 540 mm. (Foto: Marijan Grm.) Pl. 1: 1 - Mammuthus primigenius (Blumenbach); specimen 2, cross section of tusk with "Schreger structural pattern" area, Kamnica gravel pit at Drnovo in Krka river basin, sector size 90 x 78 mm; 2a-b - Mammuthus primigenius (Blumenbach); specimen 1, anterior part of tusk from the left and right lateral side, Kamnica gravel pit at Drnovo in Krka river basin, length of remain 540 mm. (Photo: Marijan Grm.) T. 2:1 - Mammuthus primigenius (Blumenbach); prečni presek največjega dela okla, prodna jama Kamnica pri Drnovem v Krški kotlini, premera 250 x 159 mm; 2a-b - Mammuthus primigenius (Blumenbach); primerek 2, zadnji večji del okla z leve in desne strani, prodna jama Kamnica pri Drnovem v Krški kotlini, dolžina ostanka 510 mm. (Foto: Marijan Grm.) Pl. 2: 1 - Mammuthus primigenius (Blumenbach); cross section of the largest part of tusk, gravel pit Kamnica near Drnovo in the Krka river basin, diameters 250 x 159 mm; 2a-b - Mammuthus primigenius (Blumenbach); specimen 2, posterior largest part of tusk from the left and right lateral side, Kamnica gravel pit near Drnovo in the Krka river basin, length of remain 510 mm. (Photo: Marijan Grm.) LATE PLEISTOCENE LION Panthera leo spelaea (GOLDFUSS 1810) SKULL AND OTHER POST-CRANIAL REMAINS FROM THE SLOUP CAVE IN THE MORAVIAN KARST, CZECH REPUBLIC LOBANJA IN POSTKRANI-ALNI OSTANKI MLAJŠE- PLEISTOCENSKEGA LEVA Panthera leo spelaea (GOLDFUSS 1810) IZ JAME SLOUP NA MORAVSKEM KRASU, ČEŠKA REPUBLIKA Cajus G. DIEDRICH Abstract A male lion skull of Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) and postcranial remains from the Sloup Cave, Moravian Karst, Czech Republic are described, together with a partial historical find of a skeleton. These are the few known steppe lion records from the mentioned famous European cave bear and hyena den. The lion material from Sloup was found partly with some postcranial bones at a hyena den area with other accumulated hyena prey bones, but also with a skull and limb bones deeper in the cave among many cave bear remains in the cave bear den area. The absence of juvenile lion material proves again that these extinct carnivores were imported by hyenas as prey or carcasses. Such taphonomic situation of adult lion remains found deep in cave bear hibernation den caves explains more and more on the presence of lion skeleton remains in Europe. Those steppe lions were cave dwellers who were stealing their prey at hyena commuting den cave entrances, and were hunting down cave bears during their hibernation, especially in winter times. The antagonistic battle between lions and hyenas/cave bears must have ended fatally in some cases in the cave itself for the lions. Keywords: Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810), Sloup Cave, Czech Republic, cave bear and hyena den, palaeoecology, Late Pleistocene Izvleček v prispevku so opisani lobanja samca vrste Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) ter posamezne kosti trupa, ki izvirajo iz jame Sloup na Moravskem krasu (Češka republika). Del članka je posvečen drugemu, zgolj delno ohranjenemu skeletu iste vrste, ki je bil že pred časom najden v isti jami. Gre za edine znane ostanke stepskega leva iz navedenega najdišča, sicer evropsko znanega brloga jamskega medveda in hijene. Levje kosti so bile najdene na več krajih v jami. Del jih je bil pomešan z nakopičenimi ostanki hijeninega plena na prostoru, ki so ga živali te vrste uporabljale kot brlog. Kar nekaj najdb, s primerkom lobanje vred, pa je skupaj z obilico medvedjih kosti ležalo globlje v jami, kjer so sicer prezimovali jamski medvedi. Odsotnost ostankov mladih levov govori proti tezi, da naj bi kosti te izumrle zveri v jamo prinesla hijena - bodisi kot lasten plen bodisi kot mrhovino. Verjetneje se namreč zdi, da so odrasli stepski levi med svojim zahajanjem v jame iz vhodnih delov, ki (ko) so služili kot brlog hijen, tem izmikali tam nakopičene ostanke plena oz. mrhovine, predvsem v klimatsko neugodnem delu leta pa z vpadi v globlje dele jam plenili tam prezimovajoče jamske medvede. Pri tem so se, kot vse kaže, ti antagonistični boji med levi in hijenami ali jamskimi medvedi v jamskem okolju včasih končali tudi s poginom prvih. Ključne besede: Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810), jama sloup, Češka republika, brlog jamskega medveda in hijene, paleoekologija, mlajši pleistocen INTRODUCTION From the Czech Republic, Late Pleistocene steppe lions Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) were first described by Wankel from the Sloup Cave. He dealt with a partial skeleton (Wankel 1868), which is at present UVOD Prva opisana najdba mlajšepleistocenskega stepske-ga leva Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) z območja današnje Češke republike je bil delno ohranjen skelet iz jame Sloup (Wankel 1868). Danes je to gradivo skupaj z Fig. 1: Late Pleistocene lion Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) skeleton composed of different male and female individuals - as well as casts (about 50% original bones) - from the Sloup Cave, with some pedal bones from the Vypustek Cave, Moravian Karst, Czech Republic (NHMW No. 1885/0014/4302). Sl. 1: Skelet mlajšepleistocenskega leva Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810), sestavljen iz kosti več samcev in samic iz jame Sloup ter iz približno enakega števila ulitih primerkov. Nekatere izmed ko sti okončin izviraj o iz jame Vypustek na Mo -ravskem krasu, Češka republika (NHMW, št. 1885/0014/4302). exposed as a composite of Sloup Cave, Vypustek Cave and casted bone material in the Natural History Museum Vienna (Fig. 1). Other lion remains were mentioned from the open air loess site Prague-Podbaba (Kafka 1903; Diedrich 2007). These materials, skeleton remains, were recently re-described as were many other isolated bones, a skull and teeth from several open air sites around Prague, whereas also a first overview was given about lion material from cave sites of the Bohemian Karst (Diedrich 2008). Only from the Chlupacovy Sluje Cave in the Bohemian Karst were other lion remains reported (Zazvorka 1954). The most complete recently known lion skeleton of the Czech Republic was derived from the Srbsko-Chlum-Komin Cave in the Bohemian Karst (Diedrich, Zak 2006). Lions from the Moravian Karst have not yet been studied at all in an overview and in detail; they were listed mainly by Wankel (1868), and later by Musil (1956), especially for the two caves of Sloup and Vypustek. From the latter, two skeletons were mounted, composed of different individuals and both being only half complete (after own observations). One skeleton is presented in the Natural History Museum Vienna (Fig. 1), the other is in the Anthroposmuseum Brno. The one composed skeleton from Vienna was bought by the Prince of Lichtenstein and was later thought to be singularly from the Sloup Cave, but many included pedal bones have historical graffiti on the bones with the cave locality of Vypustek. MATERIAL AND METHODS Historically collected lion material from the Sloup Cave housed in the Natural History Museum Vienna (= NHMW) and new remains excavated by L. Seitl in 1998 housed in the Anthroposmuseum Brno (= AMB) are described. The postcranial lion material of his excavations was labelled as "Ursus spelaeus". The few postcranial bones in the collection of the NHMW have the old stamp-like labels sticking with the running numbers, typical of all the Sloup Cave collection from Wankel. The Sloup Cave megafauna of the Wankel collections material was received in 1885 as one of the nekaj kostmi iz jame Vypustek in posameznimi ulitimi primerki kot sestavljen skelet razstavljeno v Prirodo-slovnem muzeju na Dunaju (sl. 1). O skeletnih ostankih stepskega leva so poročali tudi z najdišča na prostem Praga-Podbaba (Kafka 1903; Diedrich 2007). Gre za gradivo, ki je bilo pred nedavnim ponovno obdelano in objavljeno tako kot ne nazadnje tudi več drugih izoliranih najdb kosti, lobanj in zob s posameznih praških planih najdišč. Leta 2008 je tako izšla tudi prva sinteza vseh najdb stepskega leva s Češkega krasa (Diedrich 2008). Najpopolnejši pred nedavnim odkrit levji skelet iz Češke republike izvira iz jamskega najdišča Srbsko-Chlum-Komin (Diedrich, Žak 2006) s Češkega krasa, vrsta pa je zastopana tudi med živalskimi ostanki iz jame Chlupačovy (Zazvorka 1954). Poznavanje ostankov stepskega leva z Moravskega krasa je bistveno slabše, saj ti povečini še niso bili predmet poglobljenih znanstvenih študij. Sam popis najdb in lokacij podajata Wankel (1868) in Musil (1956), ki pa se posvečata predvsem ostankom iz jam Sloup in Vypustek. Najdbe iz slednje so bile sestavljene v dva (po avtorjevem opažanju) nepopolna skeleta, od katerih enega razstavlja Prirodoslovni muzej na Dunaju (sl. 1), drugega pa Antropološki muzej v Brnu (Anthroposmuseum). Za prvega je dolgo veljalo zmotno mišljenje, da vsi vanj vključeni ostanki izvirajo iz jame Sloup; kot namreč nedvoumno dokazujejo originalni zapisi na posameznih kosteh šap del kosti vendarle izvira iz jamskega najdišča vypustek. GRADIVO IN METODE Prispevek obravnava historične najdbe stepskega leva iz jame Sloup, ki jih hrani dunajski Prirodoslovni muzej (= NHMW), ter novejše ostanke iste vrste iz istega najdišča, ki jih je leta 1998 izkopal L. Seitl in jih danes hrani Antropološki muzej v Brnu (= AMB). Kosti trupa iz brnske zbirke so zmotno označene kot "Ursus spelaeus", na sicer pičlem številu postkranialnih najdb z dunajskega NHMW pa so še vedno ohranjene etikete z zaporednimi inventarnimi številkami, ki jih je za gradivo iz jame Sloup uporabljal Wankel. NHMW je najdbe iz Wanklove zbirke sesalske megafavne iz jame Sloup pridobil leta 1885 kot eno svojih prvih paleontoloških / □ > '' Karlsbad / ! ' —1 30 km * open air sites (hyena influenced) / plana najdišča (vpliv hijene) 'I Cave sites (hyena dens/prey depots) / jamska najdišča (brlogi hijen/akumulacije plena) Skeletons / okostja Panthera Skulls / lobanje speteea Fig. 2: Compared Late Pleistocene lion skuH and skeleton remains from caves and open air sites in the Czech Republic (composed after Diedrich 2005; Diedrich 2007, and new data). Sl. 2: Jamska in plana najdišča v Češki republiki z najdbami levjih lobanj oz. kosti trupa mlajšepleistocenske starosti (sestavljeno iz Diedrich 2005; Diedrich 2007 ter iz novih podatkov). first palaeontologjcal collectjons of the Natural History Museum Vienna, but was excavated in 1881-1882 by Sedlak who sold this collection. This collection from the Sloup Cave was donated by the Anthropologische Gesellschaft (cf. Diedrich 2009b), whereas the here figured lion skeleton was a gift to the vienna Museum by the Prince of Liechtenstein. A single atlas bone labelled with "Geologische Lehrkanyel Technische Hochschule Wien 1935" was also identified as a cave bear bone, and was finally found in-between those "Ursus spelaeus" vertebrae. None of those historical labels were found on bones of the displayed lion skeleton in the show case of the Natural History Museum Vienna (Fig. 1), which was believed to originate from the Sloup Cave. For a sex identification of the lion skull from the Sloup Cave, all recently known skulls from Czech Republic (cf. Fig. 2) were compared to other skeleton and skull remains in Europe. The postcranial bones are too incomplete for such a male/female identification, also a metapodial comparison overview is still lacking. The cave was explored during the cave bear symposium in 2007 to identify the historical excavation areas of Sedlak and the new ones of Seitl and to understand the cave morphology and different use by hyenas, cave bears and the presence of lions (Fig. 3). zbirk, sama izkopavanja pa so pod Sedlakovim vodstvom potekala že v letih 1881-1882. Navedeno gradivo je dunajskemu Prirodoslovnemu muzeju podarilo združenje Anthropologische Gesellschaft (cf. Diedrich 2009b), medtem ko predstavlja skelet s slike 1 dar liechtensteinskega princa. Eno od levjih najdb z Dunaja - gre za nosač -označuje napis "Geologische Lehrkanyel Technische Hochschule Wien 1935", sama kost pa je bila pomešana med nosače jamskega medveda. Enake označbe ni bilo opaziti na nobeni od kosti razstavljenega levjega skeleta (sl. 1), ki naj bi izvirale iz jame Sloup. pri ugotavljanju spola živali, ki je bila v gradivu iz jame Sloup zastopana s skoraj v celoti ohranjeno lobanjo, je bila ta primerjana z vsemi ostalimi znanimi levjimi lobanjami iz Češke republike (cf. sl. 2) ter s številnimi primerki iz drugih evropskih najdišč. V primeru kosti trupa podobno razvrščanje med spola ni bilo mogoče, saj je bila stopnja ohranjenosti teh kosti preskromna. Podobno velja tudi za metapodije. V okviru simpozija o jamskem medvedu je bila leta 2007 jama Sloup cilj strokovne ekskurzije, katere namen je bil prepoznati izkopavališča Sedlaka in Seitla ter poglobiti razumevanje morfologije jame in razlik v vzrokih za njeno obiskovanje med hijenami, jamskimi medvedi in levi (sl. 3). LATE pleistocene LIoN Panthera leo spelaea.. lobania in postkranialni ostanki . Sloup Cave / jama Sloup Entrance destroyed / uničen vhod Kultna Cave / jama ^I* Hyena den area / območje brlogov hijene ^to Cave bear dea area / območje brlogov jamskega medveda ■ Upper level / zgornji nivo □ Middle level / srednji nivo ■ Lower level / spodnji nivo (ponor) Fig. 3: Cave map of the SIoup Cave and area where the lion material was found (map redrawn after Zajiček et al. 2007). Sl. 3: Načrt jame SIoup z označenimi deli, kjer so bili najdeni levji ostanki (načrt modificiran po Zajiček et al. 2007). Fig. 4: skull of a male steppe lion Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) from the Sloup Cave, Moravian Karst, Czech Republic (AMB No. OK 130570): 1a - dorsal. Sl. 4: Lobanja samca stepskega leva Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) iz jame Sloup na Moravskem krasu, Češka republika (AMB, št. OK 130570): 1a - dorzalni pogled. Family: felidae Gray 1821 Genus: Panthera Oken 1816 Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) skull: The skull (Figs. 4-6.1) is incomplete. Parts of the right parietal, the left praemaxillary and other smaller parts, such as of the left frontal are missing. From the dentition only the fourth premolars are preserved (right one incomplete), though all other teeth must have been present originally. The main measurements for sex identification are: total length = 378 mm, and condylus width = 72 mm. The skull is from the Seitl excavations and was found in the deeper part of the cave during excavations in 1998 (Strlbrna chodba branch). Postcranial bones: Within the Seitl excavations a half proximal left ulna (Fig. 6.3) and a half distal right fibula (Fig. 6.4) were found. The pedal bones, historically excavated by Svedlak in 1881-1882, consist of the right and the left metacarpus II (Figs. 6.6-7) and the left metacarpus V (Fig. 6.5) and have the typical Wankel labels. Finally an incomplete atlas (Fig. 6.2) is unclear in its origin or finding position, and is the only find of the Geologische Lehrkanyel Technische Hochschule Wien. Družina: Felidae Gray 1821 Rod: Panthera Oken 1816 Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) Lobanja: Lobanja (sl. 4-6.1) je delno poškodovana. Manjkajo deli desne temenice, leve medčeljustnice ter še nekaj drugih manjših delov (npr. delček leve čelnice). Od zob sta ohranjena zgolj oba četrta predmeljaka (od tega desni primerek le delno), čeprav je moralo biti zobovje ob izkopu popolno. Ključni dimenziji za ugotavljanje spola sta kondilobazalna dolžina (= 378 mm) in širina zatilničnih čvršev (= 72 mm). Lobanja je bila najdena med Seitlovimi izkopavanji leta 1998 v enem izmed globljih delov jame (t. i. Strlbrna chodba). Kosti trupa: Med Seitlovimi izkopavanji sta bila najdena proksimalni del leve komolčnice (sl. 6.3) in distalni del desne piščali (sl. 6.4), medtem ko Svedlakova zbirka iz let 1881-1882 vključuje po eno levo in eno desno dlančnico II (sl. 6.6-7) ter levo dlančnico V (sl. 6.5), vse tri z značilnimi Wanklovimi etiketami. Na tem mestu velja omeniti še najdbo nepopolno ohranjenega nosača (sl. 6.2) iz neznanega najdišča, ki ga edinega od tukaj obravnavanih levjih najdb označuje napis "Geologische Lehrkanyel Technische Hochschule Wien 1935". Fig. 5: skull of a male steppe lion Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) from the Sloup Cave, Moravian Karst, Czech Republic (AMB No. OK 130570): 1b - lateral; 1c - ventral. Sl. 5: Lobanja samca stepskega leva Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) iz jame Sloup na Moravskem krasu, Češka republika (AMB, št. OK 130570): 1b - lateralni pogled; 1c - ventralni pogled. DISCUSSION RAZPRAVA The lion Panthera leo spelaea material seems to be from the Late Pleistocene Weichselian age, to which other material of Ursus spelaeus, Crocuta crocuta spe-a, Gulo gulo, Canis lupus, Mammuthus primigenius, v prispevku obravnavano gradivo leva vrste Panthera leo spelaea najverjetneje sodi v obdobje zadnje poledenitve mlajšega pleistocena (t. i. weichselianska po-ledenitev). V isti čas gre najbrž datirati tudi najdbe ostalih Fig. 6: Skull and postcranial bones of grown up animals of the steppe lion Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) from the Sloup Cave, Moravian Karst, Czech Republic: 1 - Skull (AMB No. OK 130570): 1d - frontal, 1e - occipital; 2 - Atlas (NHMW No. 2008z0089/0001): dorsal; 3 - Left proximal ulna fragment (AMB No. Sloup 80/80-1): lateral; 4 - Right distal half of the fibula (AMB No. Sloup 80/80-2): lateral; 5 - Left metacarpus V (NHMW No. 2008z0089/0004): dorsal; 6 - Right metacarpus II (NHMW No. 2008z0089/0003): dorsal; 7 - Left metacarpus II (NHMW No. 2008z0089/0002): dorsal. Sl. 6: Lobanja in kosti trupa odraslih primerkov stepskega leva Panthera panthera spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) iz jame Sloup na Moravskem krasu, Češka republika: 1 - lobanja (AMB, št. OK 130570): 1d - frontalni pogled, 1e - okcipitalni pogled; 2 - nosač (NHMW, št. 2008z0089/0001): dorzalni pogled; 3 - proksimalni odlomek leve komolčnice (AMB, št. Sloup 80/80-1): lateral-ni pogled; 4 - distalni odlomek desne piščali (AMB, št. Sloup 80/80-2): lateralni pogled; 5 - leva dlančnica V (NHMW, št. 2008z0089/0004): dorzalni pogled; 6 - desna dlančnica II (NHMW, št. 2008z0089/0003): dorzalni pogled; 7 - leva dlančnica II (NHMW, št. 2008z0089/0002): dorzalni pogled. Coleodonta antiquitatis, Bison priscus, Bos primigenius, Equus ferus przewalskii, Megaloceros giganteus, Rangifer tarandus, Capra ibex and possibly Saiga tatarica fits (cf. Diedrich 2009b). Wankel's large bone collection mostly consisted of several hundred famous and in many cases pathological cave bear bones (Wankel 1868; Musil 2002), which have not yet been redescribed. This large bone collection was historically excavated from the cave at different places (cf. Wankel 1868; Musil 2002). There were only about 139 non-cave bear bones, including four lion specimens described here, and 23 only briefly restudied hyena coprolites (cf. Diedrich 2009b); the latter were incorrectly identified as "cave bear excrements". All similar coloured and preserved bones of the non-cave bear fauna were found in one small area of the cave, the "Nicova Cave" part. This is where the hyena remains, its prey and coprolites were also discovered (cf. Wankel 1858; 1868), which indicates an area of hyena den use (Diedrich 2009b). Three pedal bones and possibly one atlas were found in this hyena den area and might reflect lion carcass remains imported by hyenas; a similar situation is represented by the lion bones at the Perick Caves hyena den, Germany (Diedrich 2009a). Also one wolverine from the "Nicova Cave" part was most likely imported as a complete carcass or prey by the Ice Age spotted hyenas (Diedrich 2009b). This cave part was clearly used as a hyena den, as is also proved by many hyena bone remains, including skulls, juvenile material and even several coprolites. other lion remains were found in the recent excavations deeper in the cave, in the branch of the Strlbrna chodba. Here generally only cave bear remains were found in high amounts, therefore postcranial lion bones were mixed with cave bear bones. The only lion skull of this cave and the long bone material do not prove any hyena activities. on the basis of its proportions and comparisons to many other skulls from Czech Republic and other European sites, the skull from Sloup Cave seems to belong to a male lion (Fig. 7; Diedrich 2009c). The presence of lion skulls and skeleton remains deeper in caves has most recently produced new taphonomic interpretations. New skeleton finds of lions 800 metres deep in the Romanian Ur^ilor Cave on cave bear hibernation plateaus (Diedrich et al. 2009) indicate an active cave bear hunt by steppe lions (Diedrich 2009d). Also in the Sloup Cave the lion bone presence seems to have two reasons: hyena import and cave bear predations. Without good systematic excavations and exact taphonomic studies of large cave bear dens and hyena caves, it is not possible to decide about the lion bone origin. As seen here in the Sloup Cave, and recently shown for the Srbsko-Chlum-komin Cave, often single skulls and bones from complete skeletons of lions are destroyed by misidentifications especially of postcranial bones. v jami zastopanih vrst: jamski medved (" Ursus spelaeus"), jamska hijena (Crocuta crocuta spelaea), rosomah (Gulo gulo), volk (Canis lupus), dlakavi mamut (Mammuthus primigenius), dlakavi nosorog (Coleodonta antiquitatis), stepski bizon (Bison priscus), przewalskijev konj (Equus ferus przewalskii), orjaški jelen (Megaloceros giganteus), severni jelen (Rangifer tarandus), kozorog (Capra ibex) ter morda tudi sajga (Saiga tatarica; cf. Diedrich 2009b). Bogato Wanklovo zbirko je večinoma sestavljalo nekaj tisoč pogosto patoloških kosti jamskega medveda (Wankel 1868; Musil 2002). Najdbe so bile izkopane v 19. stoletju na več različnih krajih v jami (cf. Wankel 1868; Musil 2002) in doslej še niso bile predmet moderne znanstvene revizije. Poleg kosti in zob jamskega medveda vsebuje Wanklova zbirka tudi 139 najdb drugih vrst, med njimi štiri tukaj opisane levje kosti ter 23 koprolitov hijene (cf. Diedrich 2009b); slednje so v preteklosti zmotno pripisali jamskemu medvedu. Vsi podobno obarvani in ohranjeni ostanki nemedvedje favne so bili najdeni v istem, prostorsko razmeroma skromnem delu jame, imenovanem Nicova jama. Tam so bile nakopičene tudi najdbe hijene, z ostanki njenega plena in zgoraj že omenjenimi koproliti vred (cf. Wankel 1858; 1868). Slednje nedvoumno priča o tem, da je navedena vrsta ta del jame uporabljala kot brlog (Diedrich 2009b). Med drugim naj bi tako ledenodobne lisaste hijene na navedeno lokacijo prinesle tudi cel kadaver rosomaha (Diedrich 2009b). Pri tem dejstvo, da so bili med tam najdenimi ostanki vrste Crocuta crocuta spelaea tudi lobanje, kosti in zobje mladičev, tezo o uporabi tega dela jame za brlog le še dodatno podkrepljuje. Ostanki jamskega leva so bili najdeni tudi globlje v jami, v rovu, imenovanem Strlbrna chodba. Gre za lokacijo, kjer so sicer prevladovale kosti jamskega medveda, mednje pa so bile pomešane tudi posamezne levje. Pri tem je zanimivo, da na slednjih niso bile zapažene nikakršne sledi obgrizovanja, ki bi ga lahko pripisali hijenam. Enako velja tudi za edino levjo lobanjo iz tukaj obravnavane jame. Po primerjavi z drugimi primerki iste vrste, ki so bili najdeni bodisi na območju Češke republike bodisi v kateri od drugih evropskih jamskih najdišč, je bila lobanja pripisana samcu (sl. 7; Diedrich 2009c). Prisotnost ostankov stepskega leva v globljih delih evropskih jam je bila v zadnjem času na novo interpretirana. Najdbe tudi do 800 m globoko v notranjosti romunske jame Ur^ilor na kraju, ki so ga sicer za pre-zimovanje uporabljali jamski medvedi (Diedrich et al. 2009), je mogoče namreč razumeti kot posreden dokaz, da je stepski lev aktivno plenil te največje zveri (Diedrich 2009d). Prav to naj bi bil - ob kopičenju hijen - tudi eden od razlogov za prisotnost levjih ostankov v jami Sloup. Moderna sistematska izkopavanja in natančne študije pomembnejših brlogov medveda in hijene bodo to problematiko gotovo dodatno osvetlili. Kot se je pokazalo v primeru jame Sloup, nedavno pa tudi v primeru jame Srbsko-Chlum-Komin, se Skull - sexual dimorphism Panthera leo spelaea / Lobanja - spolni diforroizem Panthera leo spelaea ^ 7.5- 7.0- 6.5- /W carr/ ? Az6(F) \^niiistek(Cz) skeleton Vienna / okos^e Dunqj Airikrutz (S) ZooHthen (D) Edingen (Brühl) (D) Sloup (Cz) Siegsdorf (D) Huttenheim (D) Vjpustek(Cz) skeleton Brno / okostje Brno Kondakovka Kolyma (Rn) Q(Cz) Scocu Sorotei (Ro) Smolen^ (Ru) Perick (D) Hyslor (Cz) Beroun (Cz) Urslor(RD) • Skulls from the Czech RepubUc / primerki iz Češke repubHke O Skulls from other parts of Europe / primerki iz ostalih delov Evrope O Open air / piano najdišče 20 30 40 50 Total lenght (cm) / kondilobazalna dolžina (cm) Fig. 7: Cranial sexual dimorphism in the lion Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) including the skulls from the Czech Republic. The male skulls are much larger than the female ones. The skull from Sloup Cave falls within the male lions (data from Altuna 1981; Argant 1988; Gross 1992; Diedrich 2009c). Sl. 7: Na lobanji izražen spolni dimorfizem pri stepskem levu Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810). Lobanje samcev so značilno večje od samičjih. Primerek iz jame Sloup se umešča k lobanjam samcev (podatki povzeti po: Altuna 1981; Argant 1988; Gross 1992; Diedrich 2009c). The selective collection of bones, which are easier to identify as lion bones (skulls, jaws and teeth), has resulted - sadly not only in the past - in the destruction of taphonomic information as well as of entire skeletons. The skeleton from Srbsko-Chlum-Komin is one of the best negative examples (cf. Diedrich, Zak 2006), but there are other lion skeletons being similarly destroyed. In some caves the skeletons must have been articulated or partly scattered disarticulated. The latter situations were both recently documented in the Ur^ilor Cave on three lion skeletons. One of those was completely articulated and another was scattered on a plateau by carnivore scavenging activities (Diedrich et al. 2009). Especially this latter situation explains the anthropogenous skull and bone selection and presence of "skulls" in collections, the postcranial material of which is possibly still in the caves. Here in the Sloup Cave, therefore, more lion material can be expected in collections or in the cave itself. Acknowledgements The collection of the Sloup Cave material was studied with the support of Dr. U. Göhlich from the Natural History Museum Vienna. A collection visit to the Anthroposmuseum Brno was kindly supported by Dr. M. Oliva. Access to the lion skull from sledi za levjimi ostanki prevečkrat izgubijo že zavoljo napačne taksonomske določitve (predvsem) kosti trupa. O tem pričajo mnoge (muzejske) zbirke z očitno porušenim razmerjem v zastopanosti posameznih skeletnih elementov, in to na način, da v njih prevladujejo predvsem taksonomsko razmeroma lahko določljivi lobanje, čeljustnice in zobje. Gre za pomanjkljivost, ki ne le da nepovratno oklesti tafonomsko informacijo, ki je zajeta v dani tafocenozi, marveč ob najdbi popolnoma ohranjenih skeletov uniči njihovo celovitost. Okostje iz jame Srbsko-Chlum-Komin je eden najočitnejših primerov takšne prakse (Diedrich, Žak 2006), ki pa jih je žal še veliko več. Zgodi se, da do takšnih napak pride pri odkritju še v celoti artikuliranih skeletov, večinoma pa se to seveda vendarle dogaja takrat, kadar so posamezne kosti že nekoliko razmetane (obe situaciji sta bili npr. dokumentirani v jami Ur^ilor; Diedrich et al. 2009). Takšna "razmetanost" namreč pogosto botruje selektivnemu pobiranju najdb, s tem pa v končni fazi tudi bolj ali manj očitni prevladi lobanj v levjih zbirkah iz posameznih najdišč. Tako lahko tudi v primeru tukaj obravnavane jame Sloup pričakujemo, da se posamezne napačno taksonomsko določene najdbe stepskega leva še vedno skrivajo v muzejskih depojih, marsikatero kost pa bi bilo zagotovo mogoče najti še tudi v jami sami. the Museum of the Bohemian Karst Beroun was possible with the support of i. Jancafikova. Prof. Dr. R. Musil gave helpful support to the cave history. Finally Dr. D. Doppes gave welcome comments on the first manuscript version. Zahvala Hvaležen sem dr. U. Gohlichu iz dunajskega Prirodoslovnega muzeja za podporo pri študiju tam shranjene zbirke najdb iz jame sloup. Ogled gradiva v brnskem Antropološkem muzeju je omogočil dr. M. Oliva, dostop do lobanje stepskega leva v hrambi Muzeja Češkega krasa v berounu pa i. Jančafikova. Prof. dr. R. Musil mi je bil v pomoč pri raziskovanju zgodovine jame, moja zahvala pa gre tudi dr. D. Doppes, ki je kritično komentirala prvo verzijo besedila. Prevod: Borut Toškan REFERENCES I LITERATURA ALTUNA, J. 1981, Fund eines Skelettes des Höhlenlöwen (Panthera leo spelaea Goldfuss) in Arrikrutz, Baskenland. - Bonner zoologische Beiträge 32I1-2, 31-46. ARGANT, A. 1988, Étude de l'exemplaire de Panthera spelaea (Goldfuss, 1810) (Mammalia, Carnivora, Felidae) du gisement Pleistocène moyen recent de la grotte d' Azé (Saone et Loire). - Revista Paléobiologie 7I2, 449-466. DIEDRICH, C. 2005, The "cave lions" fairy tale about the Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) of Europe - Late Ice Age spotted hyenas and Ice Age steppe lions in conflicts - lion killers and scavengers around Prague (Central Bohemia). - Scripta Facultatis Scientiarum Universitatis Masarykianae Geology 35 (2007), 107-112. DIEDRICH, C. 2007, Upper Pleistocene Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) skeleton remains from the open air site Praha-Podbaba and contribution to other steppe lion finds from loess and river terrace sites in Central Bohemia (Czech Republic). - Bulletin of Geo-sciences 82I2, 99-117. DIEDRICH, C. 2008, The rediscovered holotypes of the Upper Pleistocene spotted hyena Crocuta crocuta spelaea (Goldfuss 1823) and the steppe lion Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss, 1810) and taphonomic discussion to the Geilenreuther Cave hyena den (South-Germany). -Journal of the Linnean Society London 154, 822-831. DIEDRICH, C. 2009a, Steppe lion remains imported by Ice Age spotted hyenas into the Late Pleistocene Perick Caves hyena den in northern Germany. - Quaternary Research 71I3, 361-374. DIEDRICH, C. 2009b, A Late Pleistocene wolverine Gulo gulo (Linné 1758) skeleton from the Sloup Cave in the Moravian Karst, Czech Republic. - Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien 110 A, 123-132. DIEDRICH, C. 2009c, Upper Pleistocene Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) remains from the Bilstein Caves (Sauerland Karst) and contribution to the steppe lion taphonomy, palaeobiology and sexual dimorphism. - Annales de Paléontologie 95, 117-138. DIEDRICH, C. 2009d, Cave bear predation by steppe lions in Central Euope - and another reason why cave bears hibernated deeply in caves. - In I V: Abstract Book. 15th International Cave Bear Symposium, Spisskä Novä Ves, Slovakia, 17th - 20th of September 2009, 8-9, Bratislava. DIEDRICH, C. and / in K. 2ÄK 2006, Upper Pleistocene hyena Crocuta crocuta spelaea (Goldfuss 1823) prey deposit and den sites in horizontal and vertical caves of the Bohemian Karst (Czech Republic). - Bulletin of Geosciences 81/4, 237-276. DIEDRICH, C., M. ROBU, O. MOLDOVAN, S. CONSTANTIN and / in V. DRAGUSIN 2009, New Upper Pleistocene steppe lion skeleton finds between the cave bear hibernation plateaus of the Ur^ilor Cave bear den, Romania. - In / V: Abstract Book. 15th International Cave Bear Symposium, Spisskä Novä Ves, Slovakia, 17th -20th of September 2009, 10, Bratislava. GROSS, C. 1992, Das Skelett des Höhlenlöwen (Panthera leo spelaea Goldfuss, 1810) aus Siegsdorf/Ldkr. Traunstein im Vergleich mit anderen Funden aus Deutschland und den Niederlanden. - Ph.D. thesis / Disertacija, Maximilians-Universität München, Tierärztliche Fakultät, München. KAFKA, j. 1903, Fossile und Recente Raubthiere Böhmens (Carnivora). - Archiv der Naturwissenschaftlichen Landesdurchforschung von Böhmem 10/6, 1-120. MUSIL, R. 1956, Mährische Fundstellen Pleis-tozäner Wirbeltiere. - Geologie 5, 159-179. MUSIL, R. 2002, Sloupsko sosüvske jeskyne. - Brno. WANKEL, H. 1858, Über den Fund- und Lagerstätten fossiler Knochenreste vorweltlicher Thiere, insbesondere jener in der Slouper-Höhle in Mähren. -Mitteilungen der kaiserlich-königlichen mährisch-schle-sischen Gesellschaft für Ackerbau und Landeskunde 23, 186-188. WANKEL, H. 1868, Die Slouper Höhle und ihre Vorzeit. - Denkschriften der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, mathemathisch naturwissenschaftliche Klasse 28, 95-131. ZAjlČEK, P. et al. 2007, Sloupsko-Sosüvske Jeskyne. - Prague. ZÄZVORKA, V. 1954, Pažni kost lva jeskynniho -Panthera (Leo) spealaea, Goldfuss - z "Chlupacovy sluje" na Kobyle u Koneprus (Berounsko). - Časopis Närodntho muzea 123/2, 168-175. LATE PLEISTOCENE HYAENA Crocuta crocuta spelaea (GOLDFUSS, 1823) FROM BARANICA CAVE (SOUTHEAST SERBIA): COMPETITION FOR A DEN SITE MLAJŠEPLEISTOCENSKA HIJENA Crocuta crocuta spelaea (GOLDFUSS, 1823) IZ JAME BARANICA (JUGOVZHODNA SRBIJA): TEKMOVANJE ZA BRLOG Vesna DIMITRIJEVIC Abstract The majority of caves in Serbia that contain Pleistocene deposits were "bear caves". The only hyaena den cave up to now recognized is Baranica Cave (southeast Serbia, valley of the river Trgoviski Timok, near Knjazevac). It is a composite cave with two parts designated as Baranica 1 and Baranica 11 with an entrance into Baranica 11 some 20 m above Baranica 1. Faunal remains show similar composition and taphonomy in both parts. There is a wealth of herbivorous and carnivorous species remains, but hyaena remains predominate. Bone fragmentation is high, mostly due to damage made by hyaena teeth. There was competition for the living space among cave hyaena and other carnivores, as well as humans, but hyaena had taken on a major role in Baranica 1 and kept an inviolable den site in Baranica 11. Keywords: Cave hyaena, Late Pleistocene, Baranica Cave, Serbia, den site, competition Izvleček Večina srbskih jam z živalskimi ostanki pleistocenske starosti je "medvedjih", medtem ko je doslej znano jamsko najdišče s prevladujočim deležem hijene le eno - Baranica (JV Srbija, dolina reke Trgoviški Timok v bližini Knjaževca). Gre za kompleksen jamski sistem, katerega del sta tudi jami Baranica I in II, pri čemer leži vhod v slednjo kakih 20 m nad vhodom v prvo. Tafocenozi iz obeh navedenih lokacij sta si podobni tako po vrstni sestavi kot po stopnji ohranjenosti. Gradivo obsega ostanke številnih rastlinojedov in zveri, prevladujejo pa najdbe hijene. Prav omenjena vrsta je tudi odgovorna za visoko stopnjo fragmentiranosti kostnega gradiva. Kot vse kaže, je bil obravnavani jamski sistem kot življenjski prostor v pleistocenu predmet ostre konkurence med hijeno, nekaterimi drugimi zvermi ter človekom. Na območju Baranice I je bila pri tem očitno najuspešnejša prav hijena, to pa še toliko bolj velja za Baranico II, kjer je bila navedena vrsta domnevno sploh edina stalna obiskovalka. Ključne besede: jamska hijena, mlajši pleistocen, jama Baranica, srbija, brlog, tekmovanje INTRODUCTION Caves provided an important natural shelter for both humans and animals in the course of the Pleistocene. The most successful among representatives of the order Carnivora in the competition for the living space in caves were cave bear and cave hyaena due to, on the one hand, their resolute urge to den in caves and, on the other, to competitive efficiency in comparison with other UVOD Jame so bile v pleistocenu pomembno naravno zavetišče tako za človeka kot za živali. Med zvermi sta bila v tekmovanju za ta zavetja najuspešnejša jamski medved in jamska hijena, v veliki meri prav zaradi njune nujne potrebe po ureditvi primernega brloga. Pri tem sta vrsti izkoriščali svoje očitne kompetititvne prednosti. Če je jamski medved v jamskem okolju predvsem prezimoval, Carnivora. Both species made their lairs or dens in caves, cave bear hibernating in winter months, while cave hyaena nursing their cubs possibly throughout the year. The majority of caves in Serbia that contain Pleistocene deposits were "bear caves". Cave bear remains have been found in each of the 291 caves with Pleistocene mammal remains recorded up today, and they constitute more than 90 % of large mammal remains of these sites (e.g. Risovača, Petnička Cave, Ceremošnja, Prekonoška and Ledena Cave of the Ušac Cave system; Rakovec 1965; Lazarevic et al. 1988; Dimitrijevič 1992; 1994; 1997b). At some of these locations cave bear was the sole representative of large mammals (e.g. Popšička, Kovačeviča, Ravanička, Ošljarska and Velika Cave in Duboka near Kučevo; Dimitrijevič 1997b; 1998, Tab.4; Dimitrijevič et al. 2001). Abundant remains of cave bear have been found even at sites that yielded Palaeolithic artifacts, like in Pečurski Kamen, Smolučka or Prekonoška Caves (Malez, Salkovič 1988; Dimitrijevič 1991; 1997b), where humans must have interrupted bears' dominion, even if this accounted only for short episodes of occupation. An exception to this preponderance of cave bear remains in Serbian caves is noticeable at those sites that were inhabited more intensively by humans, and where humans accumulated remains of their prey, like at the Paleolithic sites of Šalitrena Cave in the valley of the Ribnica River, or Mala Balanica in the Sičevo Gorge, where excavations are in progress (Mihailovič B. 2008; Mihailovič D. 2008). pa je bila pri hijenah potreba po varnem brlogu vezana predvsem na skrb za mladiče in so zato jamo po možnosti uporabljale vse leto. Večina srbskih jam z živalskimi najdbami pleisto-censke starosti je "medvedjih". Ostanki navedene vrste so bili namreč najdeni v vsaki od 291 doslej odkritih jam z ostanki ledenodobnih sesalcev in predstavljajo več kot 90 odstotkov vseh ostankov velikih sesalcev v teh jamah (npr. Risovača, Petnička jama, Ceremošnja, Prekonoška in ledena jama v okviru jamskega sistema Ušac; Rakovec 1965; Lazarevič et al. 1988; Dimitrijevič 1992; 1994; 1997b). V nekaterih od navedenih najdišč je bil jamski medved celo edini predstavnik velikih sesalcev v tamkajšnjih tafocenozah (npr. Popšička, Kovačeviča, Ravanička, Ošljarska in Velika jama v Duboki pri Kuče-vem; Dimitrijevič 1997b; 1998, Tab. 4; Dimitrijevič et al. 2001). številni ostanki jamskega medveda so bili najdeni celo v jamah, od koder so znani tudi paleolitski artefakti. Takšni primeri so npr. Pečurski Kamen, Smolučka ali Prekonoška jama (Malez, Salkovič 1988; Dimitrijevič 1991; 1997b), kjer so ljudje očitno vsaj za krajše obdobje prekinili kontinuiteto prisotnosti jamskega medveda. Izjema med srbskimi jamami z izrazito prevlado ostankov vrste U. spelaeus so tiste, kjer je dokumentirana intenzivna prisotnost človeka, ki je v jamo prinašal svoj plen. Takšna najdišča so npr. Šalitrena jama v dolini reke Ribnice ali Mala Balanica v soteski Sičevo, kjer trenutno potekajo arheološka izkopavanja (Mihailovič B. 2008; Mihailovič D. 2008). Another exception from the dominance of cave bear remains in Serbian caves is Baranica, which is now recognized as the only hyaena den cave in Serbia. Remains of hyaena have also been found in several other sites, but mostly with quite a few remains in comparison with abundant cave bear bones and teeth. A single bone is recorded from Petnička Cave and Golema Dupka Cave (Dimitrijevič 1992; 1994; 1997b), and a coprolite from Ceremošnja Cave (Lazarevič et al. 1988). A few bones or teeth have been found in Smolučka Cave (Dimitrijevič 1991), Pečurski Kamen (Malez, Salkovič 1988), and Ledena Cave (Dimitrijevič 1997b), while somewhat more numerous hyaena remains characterize the cave of Risovača (Rakovec 1965; Dimitrijevič 1997b). The presence of hyaena is also claimed for Jerinina Cave (Gavela 1988). But none of these sites match Baranica with regard to the abundance of hyaena remains and this species' contribution to prey remains accumulation. Druge vrste izjema med srbskimi jamami z živalskimi ostanki pleistocenske starosti je Baranica, ki je edini doslej znan jamski brlog ledenodobnih hijen v državi. Navedena vrsta je bila sicer zastopana tudi v več drugih jamah, vendar povečini z zgolj skromnim številom najdb v primerjavi s prevladujočimi ostanki jamskega medveda. Po ena kost je bila tako najdena v jamah Petnička in Golema Dupka (Dimitrijevič 1992; 1994; 1997b), koprolit pa v Ceremošnji jami (Lazarevič et al. 1988). O najdbi nekaj kosti in zob poročajo še iz Smolučke jame (Dimitrijevič 1991), Pečurskega Kamna (Malez, Salkovič 1988) ter Ledene jame (Dimitrijevič 1997b), nekoliko večje število ostankov pa je znanih iz Risovače (Rakovec 1965; Dimitrijevič 1997b). Hijena naj bi bila zastopana tudi v favni jerenine jame (Gavela 1988), vendar pa nobeno od naštetih najdišč ne prekaša Baranice po številčnosti najdb njenih ostankov in njenem prispevku k akumulaciji tafocenoze. 1 The list of 25 caves with Pleistocene vertebrate remains is given in Dimitrijevič (1998); in addition, Pleistocene fossil remains have been discovered in Brezovica (Trifunovič 2004), Velika pečina in Duboka near Kučevo (Dimitrijevič et al. 2001), Hadži-Prodanova Cave (Mihailovič, D. & B. 2003) and Mala Balanica (Mihailovič D. 2008). 1 Seznam 25 jam z ostanki vretenčarjev iz pleistocen-skega obdobja podaja Dimitrijevič (1998); poleg navedenih najdišč so tovrstne najdbe znane tudi iz Brezovice (Trifunivič 2004), Velike pečine in Duboke pri Kučevem (Dimitrijevič et al. 2001), Hadži-Prodanove jame (Mihailovič, D. in B. 2003) ter Male Balanice (Mihailovič D. 2008). Fig. 1: Baranica Cave and its geographicaJ position. Sl. 1: Jama Baranica in njena geografska Jega. BARANICA CAVE: GEOGRAPHICAL POSITION, STRATIGRAPHY, PALAEOLITHIC ARTIFACTS AND FAUNAL REMAINS JAMA BARANICA: GEOGRAFSKA LEGA, STRATIGRAFIJA, PALEOLITSKI ARTEFAKTI IN ŽIVALSKI OSTANKI Baranica Cave is situated in southeast Serbia, in the valley of the river Trgoviski Timok, about 5 km southeast of Knjazevac. It is a composite cave that consists of many narrow cave passages approachable through several entrances. One entrance is positioned 15 m above the riverbed (260 m a.s.l.) and it opens into a chamber 5 m wide. This part of the cave is named Baranica I. Another one is positioned some 20 m above the first, and this part of the cave is named Baranica II (Fig. 1). Archaeological excavations were first performed in 1994 in Baranica I (Sladic, Jovanovic 1995). Interest in the site was sparked since many excavated bones seemed like bone implements. Subsequent research established that hyaenas' gnawing produced these "modifications". Yet, human-made chipped stone implements were found in the course of 1995 and 1997 excavation campaigns in the cave. Four geological layers were distinguished in Baranica I: surface humus layer with mixed material of the Holocene and Pleistocene age (layer 1), and three layers of the Pleistocene age (layers 2-4; Mihailovic et al. 1997). Excavations were stopped at the depth of 2.2 m, without reaching the floor of the cave. layers 2 and 4 contained abundant large mammal remains and a few lithic implements, while layer 3, characterized as a homogeneous gray silt, contained only rare small Jama Baranica leži v jugovzhodnem delu Srbije v dolini reke Trgoviški Timok, približno 5 km JV od Knjaževca. Gre za sestavljen jamski sistem, ki ga tvori več ozkih hodnikov, do katerih je mogoče priti skozi več različnih vhodov. Ena takšnih vstopnih točk leži 15 m nad strugo (260 m n. m.) in se odpira v 5 m široko dvorano. Ta del jame se imenuje Baranica I. Približno 20 m nad tem vhodom leži še eden, kjer je dostop do t. i. Baranice II (sl. 1). prva arheološka izkopavanja na tej lokaciji so bila izvedena leta 1994, in sicer na območju Baranice I (Sla-dič, Jovanovič 1995). K odločitvi za terensko raziskovanje je prispevalo dejstvo, da so številni kostni odlomki spominjali na orodja; kot se je izkazalo kasneje, je šlo za posledice aktivnosti hijen. V letih 1995 in 1997 so arheologi vendarle našli tudi kamnito orodje. V Baranici so bile prepoznane štiri geološke plasti: površinski humus z najdbami iz obdobja pleistocena in holocena (tj. plast 1) ter tri plasti pleistocenske starosti (tj. plasti 2 do 4; Mihailovič et al. 1997). Izkopavanja so bila prekinjena na globini 2,2 m, še preden je bilo doseženo dno jame. V plasteh 2 in 4 je bilo najdenih veliko živalskih ostankov in nekaj kamnitih orodij, medtem ko je plast 3 - označena kot homogen siv melj - vsebovala zgolj posamezne ostanke malih sesalcev (Dimitrijevič 1997a). To plast je najbrž v zelo kratkem časovnem ob- mammal remains (Dimitrijevic 1997a). This layer was probably deposited in a short episode by a water torrent through cave channels. In layer 3, there is no cave rubble, which is abundant in layers 2 and 4, neatly separating these layers. A blade, a side-scraper, and a bladelet were found in layer 2, and an end-scraper, two fragmentary blades and two flakes in layer 4, all attributable to the early Upper Palaeolithic period (Mihailovic D. 1998). Baranica II is a small rear cave chamber that remained after the construction of the road had destroyed the anterior portion of the cave space of unknown extension and proportions. It is approximately 4 m deep and 2 m wide, with an entrance only 1.5 m high. Reddish-brown silty clay with limestone rubble was deposited on the floor of Baranica II. The top of the sediment was in places cemented by cave sinter into bone breccias. The faunal composition differs slightly in Baranica I and II (Tab. 1), mostly by the presence of particular carnivorous species, represented by only a few remains, such as badger and weasel, present in Baranica I and absent in Baranica II, as well as snow leopard and wild cat that are, by contrast, present in Baranica II and absent from Baranica I. In addition, mammoth remains were only found in Baranica II. Cave hyaena remains account for 28 % of identified specimens in Baranica I, and 28.5 % in Baranica II. Three dates are available from Baranica thanks to the NERC-funded project related to the late Quaternary large-mammal extinctions in northern Eurasia conducted by A. Stuart and A. lister (lister, Stuart 2008). A lower canine of cave hyaena from Baranica II (BAR II 97/16/12; OxA - 13946) gave the age > 53,100 BP (5 13C - 18.069). A second phalanx of a giant deer (BAR 97/19/16; OxA - 13827) dated layer 2 in Baranica I to 23,520 ± 110 BP (513C - 19.415), while a third molar of a cave bear (BAR 97/80/1; OxA - 13828) dated layer 4 to 35,780 ± 320 BP (513C - 20.980). CAVE HYAENA REMAINS IN BARANICA CAVE Cave hyaena remains in Baranica I-II caves are mostly unweathered, bone and teeth structure well preserved but highly fragmented. The colour of the bones and teeth is mostly pale yellow, with black mineral oxides spotted in places on the surface of the bone and retracing crevices in the teeth enamel. Cranial remains are presented exclusively with fragmented maxillae and mandibles. There are numerous isolated teeth, while postcranial remains are less abundant (Tab. 2). There are two left maxillae: one with P3 and fragmented P4 (BAR II 1/24) and one with second and third incisor and alveolus for the first incisor (BAR II Tab. 1: Baranica Cave I and II, faunal composition. Tab. 1: Jami Baranica I in II, sestava favnističnega vzorca. BAR I BAR II Castor fiber 5(1) 3(1) Lepus sp. 8(2) 7(4) Canis lupus 17(2) 3(1) Vulpes vulpes 17(2) 14(2) Ursus spelaeus 11(3) 13(3) Meles meles 2(1) / Martes martes 3(2) 2(1) Mustela nivalis 1(1) / Crocuta crocuta spelaea 51(9) 137(12) Panthera spelaea 1(1) 1(1) Panthera pardus / 2(1) Felis silvestris / 1(1) Mammuthus primigenius / 10(3) Coelodonta antiquitatis 1(1) 21(6) Equus ferus 12(3) 84(7) Equus hydruntinus 1(1) 13(2) Megaloceros giganteus 9(3) 44(5) Cervus elaphus 3(2) 6(2) Bison priscus 31(4) 72(11) Capra ibex 9(2) 45(11) Rupicapra rupicapra 1(1) 2(1) dobju naplavil vodotok, ki je v nekem trenutku (s)tekel skozi jamo. V plasti 3 ni grušča, ki ga je sicer v plasteh 2 in 4 veliko. Nabor kamnitih artefaktov, ki vsi sodijo v zgodnji mlajši paleolitik (Mihailovič D. 1998), je naslednji: po en primerek kline, strgala in klinice izvira iz plasti 2, praskalo ter po dva odbitka in odlomka klin pa iz plasti 4. Baranica II je majhna nekdaj terminalna dvorana, ki se je edina ohranila, potem ko je med izgradnjo ceste prišlo do uničenja vhodnega dela jame neznanih razsežnosti. Dimenzije ohranjenega dela jame znašajo 4 x 2 m, sam vhod pa v višino meri poldrugi meter. Na tleh se je odložila rdečkastorjava meljasta glina s posameznimi apnenčastimi kosi grušča. vrhnji del sedimentnega zaporedja je bil skupaj s kostmi mestoma cementiran v brečo s siginim vezivom. Razlike v sestavi favnističnih vzorcev iz Baranice I in II so majhne (tab. 1); večinoma gre za to, da so posamezne zveri z nekaj najdbami zastopane v zgolj eni od obeh jam. Tak primer sta jazbec in podlasica, katerih ostanki so bili najdeni le v Baranici I, ali pa snežni leopard in divja mačka, ki sta zastopana zgolj v gradivu iz Baranice II. Ostanki jamske hijene predstavljajo 28 odstotkov vseh favnističnih najdb iz Baranice I ter 28,5 odstotka tistih iz Baranice II. Po zaslugi preučevanja mlajšekvartarnih izumrtij velikih sesalcev v severni Evraziji, projekt vodita A. stuart in A. lister (lister, Stuart 2008), financira pa ga NERC, so bile za Baranico pridobljene tri radio- Tab. 2: Baranica Cave, Crocuta crocuta spelaea remains. Tab. 2: Jama Baranica, ostanki vrste Crocuta crocuta spelaea. 2x MaxilJae 2 sin.: fr. max. with/s P3, fr. P4 (BAR II 1/24); fr. max. with/z I2, I3, aJveoJus for/za I1 (BAR II 97/24/3). 16x Mandibulae 11 sin.: fr. mand.with/z P2-M1 (BAR II 1/1); fr. mand. with/z C, aJveoJus for/za P1, root frgments of / odJomka korenin P1, P2 (BAR II 97/16/11); fr. mand. with/z C aJveoJus, root fragments of /odJomki korenin P2, P3, P4 (BAR II 97/7/28); fr. mand. with/s P4, M1 (BAR II 97/17/4); fr. mand. with/s P3, P4 (BAR II 97/11/30); fr. mand. with/s P2, P3 (BAR II 97/12/10); 2 fr. mand. with/s P3 (BAR II 97/22/1, BAR II 97/17/6); fr. mand. with/s P2 (BAR II 97/11/36); fr. mand. with/z M1 (BAR 21/2); fr. mand. with/s fr. P4 aJveoJus, fr. M1 root/korenino (BAR II 97/8/40). 4 dext.: fr. mand. with/s P3-M1, root fragment of/odJomek korenine P2 (BAR II 97/14/2); fr. mand. with/s C aJveoJus, root fragment of/odJomek korenine P2, fr. P3 (BAR II 97/29/16); fr. mand. with/s P3, P4 (BAR II 97/24/2); fr. mand. with/s fr. P3 (BAR II 97/11/34). 1 indet. side/stran: fr. mand. with/s fr. P3 (BAR II 97/20/6). 4x I1 3 sin. (BAR 95/4/2, BAR 97/29/1, BAR II 97/19/11). 1 dext. (BAR II 97/31/1). 6x I2 5 sin. (BAR 24/1, BAR 95/16/1, BAR II 97/31/2, BAR II 97/31/3, BAR II 97/3/12). 1 dext. (BAR II 97/8/7). 4x I3 1 sin. (BAR II 97/9/7). 3 dext. (BAR 27/1, BAR 95/60/1, BAR II 97/21/12). 7x C1 1 sin. (BAR 8/1). 6 dext. (BAR II 97/7/2, BAR II 97/11/33, BAR II 97/3/15, BAR II 97/25/8, BAR II 97/3/8, BAR 21/4). 2x P1 1 sin. (BAR II 1/34). 1 dext. (BAR 95/47/1) 3x P2 3 dext. (BAR II 97/4/4, BAR 14/2, BAR II 1/29). 13x P3 10 sin. (BAR II 97/2/1, BAR II 97/25/5, BAR II 97/16/14, BAR II 97/11/35, BAR II 97/17/8, BAR 97/2/10, BAR 97/37/2, BAR II 1/33, BAR II 1/35, BAR II 97/21/15). 3 dext. (BAR II 97/25/3, BAR II 97/9/24, BAR II 97/17/9). 17x P4 10 sin. (BAR II 97/1/11, BAR II 97/9/4, BAR II 97/21/8, BAR II 97/25/2, BAR II 97/5/6, BAR II 97/19/14, BAR II 97/29/20, BAR II 97/19/7, BAR II 97/19/16, BAR 95/37/1). 7 dext. (BAR 97/15/1, BAR II 97/11/31, BAR II 97/19/15, BAR 97/721/1, BAR II 97/7/16, BAR II 97/3/23, BAR II 97/24/5). 1x P/M sup. a root fragment/odJomek korenine (BAR II 3/5) 2x I1 1 sin. (BAR 97/2/14). 1 dext. (BAR II 2/2). 2x I2 2 dext. (BAR II 97/19/12, BAR 97/16/2). 8x I3 3 6 sin. (BAR II 97/29/21, BAR II 97/19/13, BAR II 97/7/11, BAR II 97/7/1, BAR 5/10, BAR 6/3). 2 dext. (BAR II 97/19/10, BAR 97/30/1). 14x C1 10 sin. (BAR II 97/15/4, BAR II 97/7/22, BAR II 97/7/4, BAR II 97/6/10, BAR 6/2, BAR II 1/2, BAR II 1/3, BAR 18/1, BAR 95/21/1, BAR II 1/4). 4 dext. (BAR II 97/15/5, BAR II 97/6/1, BAR II 97/16/12, BAR 1/6). 1x P2 1 dext. (BAR II 97/32/2). 8x P3 5 sin. (BAR II 97/12/11, BAR II 97/19/6, BAR II 97/19/5, BAR 97/2/12, BAR 95/47/2). 3 dext. (BAR II 97/7/5, BAR 97/2/13, BAR 10/14). 13x P4 9 sin. (BAR II 97/7/14, BAR II 97/3/6, BAR II 97/24/4, BAR II 97/3/18, BAR II 97/3/11, BAR II 97/19/8, BAR 23/1, BAR 9/1, BAR 10/1). 4 dext. (BAR II 97/9/2, BAR II 97/3/17, BAR II 97/31/4, BAR 1/7). 15x M1 10 sin. (BAR II 97/25/4, BAR II 97/17/5, BAR II 97/9/22, BAR II 97/3/7, BAR II 97/28/1, BAR II 97/8/9, BAR II 97/11/32, BAR II 97/21/7, BAR II 97/9/23, BAR 11/5). 5 dext. (BAR II 97/16/13, BAR II 97/3/31, BAR 97/16/1, BAR II 3/1, BAR 10/3). 1 D4 inf. sin. (BAR 10/18). 17x fr. C indet. BAR II 1/9, BAR II 97/21/10, BAR II 97/21/11, BAR II 97/20/5, BAR II 97/18/6, BAR II 97/17/7, BAR II 97/15/3, BAR II 97/10/11, BAR II 97/10/12, BAR II 97/7/12, BAR II 97/4/5, BAR II 97/3/28, BAR II 97/3/25, BAR II 97/1/12, BAR 97/17/1, BAR 97/19/12, BAR II 1/36. 7x fr. P indet. 1 fr. P3 indet. (BAR 10/15), 4 fr. P indet. (BAR 11 97/16/15, BAR 11 97/19/9, BAR 11 97/17/10, BAR 11 97/24/7), 2 fr. P/M indet. (BAR 95/40/9, BAR 95/57/1). 7x Milk teeth/ mlečni zobje 1 i3 sup. sin. (BAR 11 97/21/16), 1 c sup. (BAR 11 97/21/14), 1 D2 sup. (BAR 11 97/21/13), 2 D3 sup. sin. (BAR 97/19/13, BAR 97/2/11), 1 c inf. dext. (BAR 11 97/32/1), 1 D3 inf. sin. (BAR 25/5). 1x Vertebra cerv. BAR 97/19/19. 2x Humeri 2 fr. diaphyses: 1 sin. (BAR 11 97/10/16), 1 dext. (BAR 11 97/26/13). 2x Ulnae 2 fr. prox. dext. (BAR 97/10/14, BAR 97/19/3). 3x Radii 1 sin.: 1 fr.diaphysis (BAR 11 97/24/8). 2 dext.: 1 fr. prox. (BAR 11 97/10/15), 1 fr. diaphysis (BAR 11 97/26/12). 1x Tibia 1 dext. fr. dist. (BAR 97/19/2). 1x Calcaneus 1 dext. (BAR 97/19/6), complete/cel 2x Mt II 2 dext.: 1 almost complete/skoraj cel (BAR 97/7/1), 1 prox. (BAR 11 97/7/25). 1x Mc IV 1 dext. (BAR 11 97/16/16), complete. 2x Mp indet. 1 dist. (BAR 11 1/23), 1 unfused/nezraščena dist. epiphyses (BAR 11 97/21/9). 1x Phalanx 1 1 dist. BAR 11 97/28/4. 1x coprolite/ koprolit BAR 11 97/12/13. 97/24/3). Fifteen fragmented mandibles were found: 11 left and 4 right. The best preserved are a left mandible with complete jugale teeth row P2-M1 (BAR II 1/1) and a right mandible with root fragment of P2 and P3-M1 (BAR II 97/14/2; Fig. 2a), both with gnawed symphyseal and vertical branch ends. The remaining mandible fragments mostly have gnawed parts of the mandible body containing few teeth and damaged alveoli. Numerous isolate teeth comprise all classes of teeth, among which 43 % are with complete crown and roots, the remaining 57 % are fragmented. Fragmented teeth often show traces of predators gnawing on the roots. Milk dentition is represented by a deciduous left third incisor, a deciduous canine and a deciduous second upper molar, probably coming from the same jaw together with a third permanent premolar germ, as well as a single lower right deciduous canine, 2 left upper third milk molars, single lower third deciduous molar, and a single lower last deciduous molar. The postcranial skeleton is represented by a single cervical vertebra, several long bones and few bones of distal extremities. The vertebra belonged to a young animal as indicated by unfused cranial and caudal articular surfaces of the vertebra body. All long bones are fragmented: two humeri, one left (Fig. 3b) and one right (Fig. 3a), one right ulna (Fig. 4a), three radii, one left and 2 right (Fig. 4b), and a single right tibia. Judging by the fused epiphyses, or solid bone structure and relative size where epiphyses are damaged, all long bones originate from adults or subadults. Distal extremities bones are represented by a right calcaneus with fused tuber calcanei, two complete and two fragmented metapodials with fused epiphyses, one unfused distal epiphysis of a metapodial and a single fragmented first phalanx. karbonske datacije. Spodnji podočnik jamske hijene iz Baranice II (BAR II 97/16/12; OxA - 13946) je pokazal na starost > 53.100 BP (613C - 18,069). druga prstnica orjaškega jelena (BAR 97/19/16; OxA - 13827) iz plasti 2 Baranice I je bila datirana v 23.520 ± 110 BP (613C - 19,415), tretji meljak jamskega medveda (BAR 97/80/1; OxA - 13828) iz plasti 4 pa v 35.780 ± 320 BP (613C - 20,980). OSTANKI JAMSKE HIJENE IZ BARANICE Na površini kostnih ostankov jamske hijene iz Baranice I in II večinoma ni opaziti luščenja in razpok, ki bi nastali zaradi izpostavljenosti nihajočim (mikro) klimatskim razmeram. Tudi kostna/zobna struktura je dobro ohranjena, čeprav so najdbe izrazito fragmentira-ne. Obarvanost ostankov je bledo rumena, mestoma je na površini kosti in zob najti tudi črne mineralne okside. Od lobanjskih kosti so v vzorcu zastopane izključno fragmentirane zgornje in spodnje čeljustnice. Sicer pa gradivo obsega tudi številne izolirane zobe in posamezne kosti postkranialnega skeleta (tab. 2). Izmed dveh najdenih zgornjih čeljustnic ima ena ohranjena nepoškodovan tretji predmeljak in odlomek četrtega (BAR II 1/24), druga pa drugi in tretji sekalec skupaj z zobno jamico prvega (BAR II 97/24/3). Spodnje čeljustnice so zastopane s 15 primerki: enajstimi levimi in štirimi desnimi. Najbolje ohranjena sta po en levi primerek s celotnim zobnim nizom od P2 do M1 (BAR II 1/1) ter en desni z odlomkom korenine P2 in nepoškodovanimi ostalimi (pred)meljaki (BAR II 97/14/2; sl. 2a); pri obeh sta ohranjeni tudi obgrizena simfiza in vertikalna veja mandibule. Med ostalimi primerki Fig. 2: Baranica Cave, Crocuta crocuta spelaea, mandible fragments: a - right mandible with rooth fragment of Pj and P3-Mj (BAR II 97/14/2); b - left mandible with P4 and Mj (^AR II 97/17/4); c - left mandible with P3 and P4, (BAR I1 97/11/30); d - left mandible with P2 and P3 (BAR 11 97/12/10). Sl. 2: Jama Baranica, Crocuta crocuta spelaea, odlomki spodnjih čeljustnic: a - desni primerek s fragmentom korenine P2 ter P3-Mj (BAR II 97/14/2); b - levi primerek s P4 in Mj (BAR II 97/17/4); c - levi primerek s P3 in P4 (BAR II 97/11/30); d - levi primerek s P2 in P3 (BAR II 97/12410). The high fragmentation of hyaena remains both in Baranica I and II is the consequence of hyaena's scavenging and cannibalistic activities. Mostly bones and teeth are severely broken and many bear traces of intensive gnawing. All mandible fragments show traces that indicate that they were broken by powerful hyaena teeth (Fig. 2). Isolated teeth frequently show damages on the roots indicating that they are extracted from jaws by the cracking of mandibles. Long bones epiphyses are mostly completely gnawed (Fig. 3) or show severe gnawing and nibbling damages (Fig. 4), typical for the hyaena-mode of bone destruction. There are few complete bones (calcaneus, metacarpus, and an unfused distal epiphyses of a metapodial). The excellent preservation of several un- Fig. 3: Baranica Cave, Crocuta crocuta spelaea, repetitive pattern of hyaena humeri gnawing: a - right humerus (BAR II 97/26/13); b - left humerus (BAR II 97/10/16). Sl. 3: Jama Baranica, Crocuta crocuta spelaea, ponavljajoč se vzorec hijenjinega obgrizovanja nadlahtnice: a - desna nadlahtnica (BAR II 97/26/13); b - leva nadlahtnica (BAR II 97/10/16). prevladujejo ogrizeni odlomki spodnječeljustničnih teles (corpus mandibulae) s posameznimi zobmi oz. poškodovanimi zobnimi jamicami. Izmed številnih najdenih zob jih je 43 odstotkov ohranjenih v celoti, tj. s korenino in krono; preostalih 57 odstotkov je bolj ali manj fragmentiranih. Na koreninah slednjih so pogosto vidni odtisi zob plenilcev. Od mlečnih zob so bili v Baranici najdeni levi tretji sekalec, podočnik in drugi zgornji meljak - vsi najverjetneje pripadajo isti čeljustnici z ohranjenim zametkom stalnega tretjega predmeljaka - ter desni spodnji podočnik, dva leva zgornja ter po en tretji in zadnji spodnji meljak. Od postkranialnih skeletnih elementov je v gradivu iz Baranice primerek vratnega vretenca, več dolgih kosti ter nekaj kosti distalnega dela okončin. Vretence je pripadalo mladi živali, o čemer pričata obe končni ploskvi, ki še nista zraščeni s telesom vretenca. Vse dolge kosti so fragmentirane: dve nadlahtnici - po ena desna (sl. 3a) in ena leva (sl. 3b), ena desna komolčnica (sl. 4a), tri koželj-nice - po ena leva in dve desni (sl. 4b), ter desna golenica. Sodeč po zraščenosti epi- in diafiz oz. strukturi jedrnate (kompaktne) kosti ter dimenzijah ostankov se zdi, da so vse naštete dolge kosti pripadale bodisi subadultnim bodisi odraslim živalim. Od kosti spodnjih delov okončin so Fig. 4: Baranica Cave, Crocuta crocuta spelaea, disarticulated and gnawed at both ends ulna and radius: a - right ulna; b - right radius. Sl. 4: jama Baranica, Crocuta crocuta spelaea, izolirana in obojestransko obgrizena komolčnica in koželjnica: a - desna komolčnica; b - desna koželjnica. damaged specimens shows that physico-chemical conditions in the cave favored preservation of the remains and are not responsible for the fragmentation. Traces of water transport on the bones are not found. Preservation of permanent teeth germs with fragile tooth wall in their initial stages of development, as well as complete milk teeth support the presumption that remains were not transported by physical agencies. Measurements of lower and upper teeth and a small number of postcranial elements that allowed for the measurements to be taken are shown in tables 3-5. The relative sizes and proportions of carnassials and premolars are consistent with spotted hyaena Crocuta crocuta, and are distinctly different from the teeth of 16 15.5 15 !14.5 14 13.5 13 12.5 29 30 31 32 Length / dolžina 33 34 ■ Baranica I, layer 2 / plast 2 o Baranica 11 Fig.5: Baranica Cave, Crocuta crocuta spelaea, lower carnas-sial, breadth by lenght (mm), from Baranica II and layer 2 of Baranica I. Sl. 5: jama Baranica, Crocuta crocuta spelaea, spodnji derači iz Baranice II in plasti 2 Baranice I. Podani so tudi podatki o največji širini oz. dolžini (v mm) navedenih zob. bili najdeni desna petnica z zraščeno petnično grčo (tuber calcanei), po dva v celoti ohranjena in dva fragmentirana metapodija z zraščenimi epifizami, še ne v celoti osificiran metapodij ter odlomek prve prstnice. Večina kosti in zob hijene iz Baranice I in II je močno fragmentiranih - mnoge so tudi obgrizene, kar gre pripisati mrhovinarskim in kanibalističnim aktivnostim hijen samih. Sledi na odlomkih spodnjih čeljustnic kažejo, da jih je strl prav močan ugriz te živali (sl. 2). Na številnih izoliranih zobeh je opaziti poškodbe korenin, ki so očitno nastale med trenjem čeljustnic. Epifize dolgih kosti so bile največkrat povsem uničene (sl. 3), redki ohranjeni primerki pa kažejo sledi intenzivnega obgrizovanja, ki ga gre nedvomno pripisati hijeni (sl. 4). Nepoškodovanih kosti je zgolj peščica (petnica, dlančnica ter še nezraščena distalna epifiza nekega metapodija), skoraj pri vseh pa je odlično ohranjena kostna substanca. Slednje dokazuje, da fragmentiranosti favnističnega gradiva iz Baranice dejansko ni utemeljeno pripisati neugodnim fizikalno-kemijskim razmeram v obeh jamah, saj so bile te ohranitvi kostne substance očitno naklonjene. Prav tako na kosteh ni opaziti sledi vodnega transporta. Najdbe zametkov stalnih zob s krhkimi stenami v zgodnji fazi razvoja ter nepoškodovanih mlečnih zob podkrepljujejo zgoraj navedeno tezo o tem, da favni-stično gradivo ni bilo transportirano po zaslugi katerega izmed fizikalnih dejavnikov. Metrični podatki za spodnje in zgornje zobe ter za manjše število dovolj dobro ohranjenih postkranialnih skeletnih elementov so podani v tabelah 3 do 5. Tab. 3: Baranica Cave, Crocuta crocuta spelaea upper jaw teeth measurements. Explanation of abbreviations: L - mesio-distal diameter (lenght) of the crown; B - bucco-Iingual diameter (breadth) of the crown. Tab. 3: Jama Baranica, Crocuta crocuta spelaea, metrični podatki za zgornje zobe. Obrazložitev simbolov: L - mezo-distalni premer (dolžina) krone; B - buko-Iingvalni premer (širina) krone. 1 50,000 BP, i.e. the supposedly warmer part of the glacial. It is argued that the size of hyaena changes according to the Bergmann rule: they are larger in cold environments and increase with the latitude (Klein, Scott 1989). However, the question remains how sensible to the temperature changes hyaenas really were, and how other factors, for example competition with other species, or constraints in an environment, might have affected their size. HYAENA AGE STRUCTURE The age structure of hyaenas inhabiting Baranica Cave is established on the basis of their teeth, as the most abundant remains and most reliable for age determination. There are several methods for age structure identification, based either on teeth rows or isolated teeth. Kruuk (1972), for example, distinguished 5 wear stages on permanent lower jaw teeth. Brugal et al. (1997) distinguished six stages including juveniles I and II (with milk teeth), subadults (III) with permanent unworn teeth, young adults (IV) with M1 light wear, and mature and old adults (V and VI) with worn M1. Stiner (1994; 2004) distinguished 9 wear stages on Pj, including its milk predecessor. This is also suitable (with minor adjustments) for the upper third premolar. In Baranica teeth rows are not very numerous, while isolated teeth - including third premolars - are much better represented. Consequently, the latter method has been selected for the identification of the age structure of the Baranica's hyaenas. Stiner's dental eruption and wear sequence I-IX is subdivided into three relative age groups - juvenile (I-III), prime adult (IV-VII) and old adult (VIII-IX). juveniles encompass deciduous premo-lars (I), erupted permanent third molars with unworn crown and 10-50 % formed root (II) and slightly worn crowns with more than half root formed (III). prime adults encompass crowns with elliptical wear mark on prime cones starting with a small wear mark (IV) until the large wear mark touching accessory cusps (VII), while old adults have a large wear mark broadly connecting prime cones and accessory cusp marks (VIII) or are completely worn out (IX). All Baranica third premolars belong to juveniles and prime adults. Age stage is identified both in the lower and upper, left and right teeth, and the minimum number of individuals (MNI) was established by counting the maximal number of the same side tooth in each stage. A minimum number of 15 animals was established for the whole site: 5 in Baranica I and 10 in Baranica II. There are 7 juveniles: 2 belonging to stage I and 2 be- velikosti pri hijeni sovpadalo z Bergmanovim pravilom. To pravi, da so toplokrvne živali, ki živijo na območju s hladnejšim podnebjem, praviloma višje in daljše od njihovih sorodnikov na območjih s toplejšim podnebjem (Klein, Scott 1989). Vendar pa ostaja vprašanje občutljivosti hijen na temperaturna nihanja še vedno odprto, kar velja tudi za potencialni vpliv drugih omejitvenih dejavnikov v okolju, vključno s tekmovanjem z drugimi vrstami. STAROSTNA STRUKTURA HIJEN Starostna struktura hijen iz Baranice temelji na rezultatih analize zob, ki kot najštevilčnejše zastopan skeletni element v vzorcu omogočajo tudi najbolj verodostojne rezultate. V literaturi je najti več različnih metodologij za ocenjevanje starostne strukture na podlagi zob. Tako npr. Kruuk (1972) razlikuje med petimi stopnjami obrabe žvekalne površine stalnih spodnjih ličnikov in kočnikov. Po drugi strani Burgal in sodelavci (1997) omenjajo sedem starostnih kategorij, vključno z juvenilnima I in II (živali z mlečnimi zobmi), subadultno (III; stalni zobje še neo-brabljeni), mlado odraslo (IV; M1 kaže prve sledi obrabe žvekalne površine) ter staro odraslo (V in VI; prvi spodnji meljak močno obrabljen). Še več stopenj - devet - navaja Stinerjeva (1994; 2004). Pri tem se osredotoča na spodnji tretji predmeljak, vključno z njegovim mlečnim predhodnikom, podoben pristop pa je z manjšimi popravki primeren tudi za zgornji tretji predmeljak. V gradivu iz Baranice je število čeljustnic z ohranjenim celotnim zobnim nizom skromno. Bistveno bolje so zastopani izolirani zobje - vključno s tretjimi predmeljaki, zato je bila starostna struktura v našem primeru ocenjena z upoštevanjem smernic Stinerjeve. Pri tem smo devet stopenj obrabe P3 (tj. I-IX) razvrstili v tri relativne starostne razrede: mladi (I-III), mlajši odrasli (IV-VII) in stari odrasli (VIII-IX). K mladim prištevamo mlečne primerke (I), že izrasle stalne P3 brez sledi obrabe in z 10-50-odstotno razvito korenino (II) ter primerke z blago obrabljeno žvekalno površino in več kot polovično razvito korenino (III). Mlajše odrasle živali označuje eliptično obrabljen prednji del krone (IV) oz. začetek obrabe stranskih grebenov (VII), medtem ko k starim odraslim prištevamo primerke z napredovano stopnjo obrabe vseh grebenov (VIII) ter popolnoma obrabljene zobe (IX). Vsi tretji predmeljaki iz Baranice pripadajo mladim oz. mlajšim odraslim živalim. Stopnja obrabe žvekalne površine je bila ugotavljana na vseh zgornjih in spodnjih ter levih in desnih P3, pri čemer je bilo za vsako od devetih stopenj obrabe izračunano tudi najmanjše število živali (MNI; Minimum Number of Individuals). Najmanjše število živali za celotno gradivo iz Ba-ranice je 15, tj. pet iz Baranice I in deset iz Baranice II. Mladih primerkov je sedem; od tistih iz Baranice I dva izkazujeta stopnjo obrabe I ter dva stopnjo obrabe III, longing to stage III in Baranica I, and one belonging to stages I, II and III, all in Baranica II. There are 8 prime adults: one belonging to stage IV both in Baranica I and Baranica II, while stages V-VII are represented only in Baranica II - 3 in stage V, 2 in stage VI and 1 in stage VII. The presence of both juveniles and prime adults is consistent with the presumption that Baranica Cave was used by hyaenas as a den for breeding their young. Most probably hyaenas chose Baranica II as their den in this secluded small place at the end of the cave channel2, and this part of the cave was probably exclusively used by hyaenas. In Baranica I, the excavation that took place at the area close to the entrance, probably did not reach the particular den place, but the area also used by other animals and, occasionally, humans. Hyaenas were certainly present there too, passing on their way to deeper parts of the cave, bringing and scattering bones of animals around the place. HYAENAS' PREY SELECTION As a consequence of the cave hyaenas' denning, hyaena adult and cub remains were accumulated in Baranica, but also remains of the animals that hyaenas hunted or scavenged. There is the expected lack of preference for any particular species of prey in the Baranica assemblage. As a scavenger, the hyaena searches for meat of whatever animal, which died of whatever cause, whether predator, illness, exhaustion or simply advanced age. The selectivity is noticeable concerning the availability and the size of prey. Searching for prey usually in packs, and arriving at the spot often after the main predators (i.e. hunting animals), hyaenas rarely dragged any small animals, such as beavers, or hares. The majority of their prey brought to the cave were very large, large and medium sized herbivores, while the frequency of particular herbivore species remains mostly dependent on its abundance in the region. The Baranica faunal assemblage indicates that giant deer were more abundant in the region than red deer, caballoid horse than hydruntinus, ibex than chamois. In the bone accumulation, sizes of the prey vary, and the fact that Baranica was close to the possible drinking place is of importance, since fragments of very large bones of the largest animals, mammoth and rhino, were brought into the cave. Prey selection is also reflected in the differential distribution of age classes of various prey animals. Largest animals (like mammoth and rhino) are almost exclusively izmed treh tretjih predmeljakov iz Baranice II pa gre po enega pripisati vsaki od prvih treh stopenj obrabe (tj. I-III). Izmed osmih mlajših odraslih primerkov sta dva izkazovala stopnjo obrabe IV (po eden iz Baranice I in II), medtem ko so stopnje V-VII zastopane zgolj v Baranici II (3 x stopnja V, 2 x stopnja VI ter 1 x stopnja VII). Prisotnost ostankov tako mladih kot mlajših odraslih živali je skladna s tezo, da so hijene v Baranici vzrejale svoje mladiče. Brlog je bil domnevno lociran na območju Baranice II, ki je bila takrat verjetno dobro skrita manjša terminalna dvoranica na koncu ožjega rova.2 Pri tem se celo zdi, da so ta del jame takrat uporabljale skoraj izključno hijene. V nasprotju z navedenim na območju Baranice I brlogov najbrž nikoli ni bilo. Na tem vhodnem delu nekdanje jame, ki je bil tudi edini podrobneje arheološko raziskan, so se sicer zadrževale različne živalske vrste ter tudi človek. Same hijene so tod mimo prehajale globlje v notranjost, tjakaj prinašale ostanke plena, pri tem pa še razmetavale na tleh ležeče kosti. IZBOR PLENA PRI HIJENI Jama Baranica je, kot že večkrat omenjeno, v pleistocenu služila tudi kot brlog jamskih hijen. Zaradi tega tam nakopičeno favnistično gradivo obsega tako kosti in zobe odraslih hijen in njihovih mladičev kot tudi ostanke plena oz. mrhovine. V skladu s pričakovanji med slednjimi ne izstopa nobena vrsta. Hijeno namreč kot mrhovinarja pritegne meso katere koli poginule živali ne glede na razlog pogina (tj. plenilec, bolezen, izčrpanost ali preprosto visoka starost). Selektivnost je opazna zgolj v povezavi z razpoložljivostjo in velikostjo plena. Velik plen praviloma iščejo v tropih, pri čemer na samo mesto uplenitve navadno dospejo, potem ko ga je primarni plenilec že zapustil. V primeru Baranice je bilo ugotovljeno, da so hijene v jamo prinašale predvsem zelo velike, velike in srednje velike rastlinojede, ne pa tudi manjših živali (npr. bobrov, zajcev). Delež zastopanosti posameznih rastlinojedov domnevno odseva predvsem njihovo pogostnost v takratnem okolju. Tako gre iz razpoložljivega favnističnega gradiva sklepati, da je bil orjaški jelen v okolici Baranice pogostejši od navadnega, kabaloidni konj pogostejši od hidruntinusa in kozorog pogostejši od gamsa. Da so v gradivu iz Baranice tudi ostanki največjih živali (npr. mamuta, nosoroga), gre najbrž pripisati dejstvu, da jama leži v neposredni bližini vira pitne vode, tako da pot prenosa kadavra ni bila dolga. 2 Recent research on caves in Jordan showed that striped hyaenas raise their cubs in dens that are small and narrow, just large enough for the cubs. Although the spotted hyaena is genetically closely allied to the cave hyaena, there is a possibility that the striped hyaena is more similar in its behavior to its Pleistocene relatives since it has a habit of carrying large bones into caves (Kempe et al. 2006). 2 Novejše raziskave jamskih sistemov Jordanije so pokazale, da so brlogi progastih hijen majhni in ozki, tako da je v njih prostora zgolj za mladiče. Čeprav je jamska hijena genetsko bolj sorodna lisasti, obstaja možnost, da so bile v etološkem smislu vendarle bliže progastim hijenam, saj obe združuje praksa prinašanja večjih kosti v jamo (Kempe et al. 2006). presented by very young or very old animal remains, while large (horse, bison, giant deer) to medium sized (ibex) herbivorous remains comprise also remains of young adults and adults. This is probably the consequence of altering strategies on hunting and scavenging, with the largest animals being exclusively scavenged, while juveniles and large to medium sized adults were casually hunted. On the other hand, the body part representation is similar for most of the herbivorous prey in those cases where the representation of these respective species suggests a pattern (horse, bison, giant deer and ibex). Cranial elements are well-represented, and among them by far the most numerous are teeth. Distal extremities are even more frequent, while upper extremities, girdles, vertebrae and ribs are rare or entirely missing (Fig. 6). Fig.6: Baranica Cave, Bison priscus skeleton elements frequency: 1 - cranial; 2 - vertebra and ribs; 3 - girdles; 4 -long bones; 5 - metapodials; 6 - carpals, tarsals and phanages. Sl. 6: Jama Baranica, zastopanost posameznih skeletnih elementov vrste Bison priscus: 1 - lobanja; 2 - vretenca in rebra; 3 - oplečje/ okolčje; 4 - dolge kosti; 5 - metapodiji; 6 - zapestne in nartne kosti ter prstnice. Selektivnost pri izbiri plena je razvidna tudi v različni zastopanosti posameznih starostnih skupin uplenjenih živali. od velikih živali (npr. mamuta, nosoroga) so v gradivu prisotni skoraj izključno ostanki zelo mladih ali zelo starih primerkov, medtem ko so veliki (konj, zober, orjaški jelen) in srednje veliki (kozorog) rastlinojedi zastopani tudi z najdbami mladih odraslih in odraslih živali. Ugotovitev je najbrž povezana z dejstvom, da sta se strategiji lova in mrhovinarstva razlikovali na način, da so bile največje živali hijenam dostopne zgolj kot mrhovina, medtem ko so mlade mamute ali nosoroge ter srednje velike rastlinojede vseh starosti občasno tudi plenile. Drugače kot ob vzporejanju starostnih struktur analiza zastopanosti posameznih skeletnih elementov ni pokazala na obstoj opaznejših medvrstnih razlik pri nobenem od zadovoljivo zastopanih rastlinojedov (konjev, zobrov, orj aških j elenov in kozorogov). Številni so ostanki kranialnih skeletnih elementov, predvsem zob. Še bolje zastopane so kosti distalnega dela okončin, medtem ko je ostankov proksimalnega dela okončin, oplečja oz. okolčja, vretenc in reber zgolj peščica oz. ti v celoti manjkajo (sl. 6). CONClUSION: COMPETITION FOR THE lIVING SPACE IN BARANICA Animal remains that were accumulated in Baranica Cave indicate prolonged use of various passages and chambers of the cave by hyaena. Several characteristics indicate that the Baranica II assemblage was almost exclusively, and Baranica I to a great extent, accumulated by hyaena: the taxonomic variability of the faunal composition, large number of carnivorous taxa present, abundant hyaena remains, the prevalence of very large and large-size when compared to middle and small size herbivores, and tooth marks and modifications on a large number of mammal bones. There is a single major difference in relation to most of the other described fossil hyaena den sites. It relates to the fact that only one coprolite has been found3. The presence of one would indicate that their preservation was possible, which in turn accentuates their absence. However, it is possible 3 This single coprolite is sampled for pollen analysis: 13 pollen grains were extracted, not enough for precise reconstruction, but still giving some information on the vegetation, indicating a very open landscape in the surroundings of Baranica, with the presence of steppe taxa related to rather harsh climatic conditions (Argant, Dimitrijevic 2007). SKlEP: TEKMOVANJE ZA ŽIVlJENJSKI PROSTOR V BARANICI živalski ostanki iz jame Baranica pričajo, da so hijene njene hodnike in dvorane uporabljale dalj časa. Vrstna pestrost vzorca (vključno z velikim številom zverskih vrst), številni ostanki hijene, boljša zastopanost zelo velikih in velikih rastlinojedov nasproti srednje velikim in majhnim ter številne obgrizene kosti so vse indici v prid tezi, da so v Baranico II zahajale skoraj izključno, v Baranico I pa predvsem hijene. V primerjavi z večino drugih objavljenih jamskih brlogov navedene vrste se tisti iz Baranice razlikuje predvsem po tem, da je bil ob kosteh najden zgolj en primerek koprolita.3 Njegova prisotnost dokazuje, da so se koproliti v tamkajšnjem mikrookolju očitno lahko ohranili, kar le še poudarja pomen njihove siceršnje odsotnosti. Je pa seveda povsem mogoče tudi to, da niso enakomerno razporejeni po 3 Palinološka analiza koprolita je zajela 13 pelodnih zrn. Žal skromnost vzorca onemogoča natančno rekonstrukcijo paleookolja, vseeno pa iz rezultatov analize izhaja, da je bila pokrajina v okolici Baranice zelo odprta. Najdeni so bili namreč ostanki stepskih vrst, vezanih na razmeroma ostre klimatske razmere. that coprolites were not evenly distributed across the den site but concentrated in unexcavated areas. In Baranica II, there is also a complete absence of traces of other inhabitants: there are no artifacts made by humans, no cubs' remains of other carnivorous species, and no teeth traces on bones that would indicate larger or smaller species of carnivores than hyaena. With Baranica I the circumstances are more complicated. The presence of humans is proven on the basis of lithic implements. However, humans probably only rarely visited Baranica, and did not spent too much time in it. The number of artifacts is low, they all belong to defined tool types and no flint chips have been found, even in wet-sieved samples, indicating that artifacts had not been made on-site, but brought from outside. There are also almost no traces of flint artifacts on animal bones to indicate their usage for processing animal carcasses. It is more likely that various species of carnivores occasionally used this part of the cave than Baranica II - fox and wolf, for example. The pattern of bone fragmentation differs, and there are traces of gnawing that correspond to smaller teeth than hyaenas'. Three milk teeth of cave bear have been found. Although cave bear remains are not numerous, and probably bears did not shelter in the entrance part that was excavated, it is quite probable that they used some of the unexplored parts of the cave. It is already mentioned that Baranica is a complex cave system, of which Baranica II and I are only small parts. Undoubtedly, competition for the living space in Baranica was fierce, but cave hyaena doiminated in these "battles". površini jame, temveč večinoma ležijo na katerem od njenih neizkopanih delov. v Baranici II poleg koprolitov v celoti manjkajo tudi sledi eventualnih drugih obiskovalcev jame: ni namreč človekovih artefaktov, ni ostankov mladičev drugih zverskih vrst in ni niti odtisov zob, ki bi jih lahko povezali s katero od večjih oz. manjših zveri, kot je hijena. Okoliščine, povezane z Baranico I, so bolj zapletene. Najdbe kamnitih izdelkov dokazujejo prisotnost človeka, čeprav je jamo verjetno obiskoval bolj poredko-ma. število artefaktov je namreč pičlo, zastopani so zgolj končni izdelki, odsotnost odbitkov - tudi v sedimentu, ki je bil spran skozi sita - pa priča o tem, da orodij ni izdeloval v jami. Skoraj v celoti manjkajo tudi sledi urezov na kosteh, ki bi kazali na uporabo kamnitih orodij pri raztelešanju plena oz. mrhovine. Podobno kot ljudje so tudi različne zveri (npr. lisica, volk) obiskovale predvsem Baranico I. Vzorec fra-gmentiranosti kostnih najdb s tega dela jame je namreč drugačen, na nekaterih obgrizenih kosteh so prisotni odtisi zob, ki so manjši od hijeninih. v navedenem gradivu so, kot že omenjeno, tudi trije mlečni zobje jamskega medveda. Nizko število ostankov gre vsaj do neke mere gotovo povezati z dejstvom, da so arheološka izkopavanja zajela zgolj vhodni del Baranice I, medtem ko so medvedi najbrž večinoma prezimovali v globljih delih jame. Ne gre namreč pozabiti, da je Baranica kompleksen jamski sistem, od katerega predstavljata Baranica I in II zgolj manjši del. Tekmovanje za življenjski prostor v Baranici je bilo nedvomno ostro, a kot kaže, je bila zmagovalec v teh "bitkah" prav hijena. Acknowledgements I wouJd Jike to express my debt to the Jate prof. DragosJav Srejovic who invited me to analyze anima! bones from Baranica. I thank the first excavators of the site, MirosJav Lazic and MiJe SJadic, who excavated it in 1994, as weJJ as Dušan MihaiJovic who conducted the excavations in 1996-1997. My speciaJ gratitude goes to the smaJJ team that excavated Baranica II in 1997: the Jate Svetozar Jovanovic, curator of the city museum in Knjaževac, AJeksandar MiJutinovic, photographer in the same museum, and MiJan Čukvas, at the time student of paJeontoJogy. Saša Kujic, at the time student of medicine heJped a Jot in the preparation and conservation of bones and teeth. I am especiaUy gratefuJ to Tony Stuart and Adrian Lister for the AMS dates on the Baranica sampJes, which were obtained as part of their research on megafaunaJ extinctions. I am aJso gratefuJ to the Ministry of Science and TechnoJogi-caJ DeveJopment of the RepubJic of Serbia for funding the project "KuJtura Lepenskog Vira: kuJturni procesi i transformacije u peri-odu od IX do VI miJenijuma p.n.e.", in the scope of which animaJ bones were anaJyzed, as weJJ as to the University of BeJgrade, FacuJty of Mining and GeoJogy, Department of PaJaeontoJogy, and FacuJty of PhiJosophy, Department of ArchaeoJogy, for providing aJJ necessary conditions for faunaJ research. Zahvala Rada bi se zahvalila pokojnemu prof. Dragoslavu Srejovicu, ki me je povabil k analizi živalskih kosti iz Baranice. Zahvaljujem se prvim izkopavalcem najdišča: Miroslavu Lazicu in Miletu Sladicu, ki sta vodila izkopavanja v letu 1994, kot tudi Dušanu Mihailo-vicu, ki je vodenje prevzel v letih 1996-1997. Posebna zahvala gre majhni ekipi, ki je leta 1997 opravila terensko raziskovanje v Baranici II in ki so jo sestavljali pokojni Svetozar Jovanovic (kustos Mestnega muzeja v Knjaževcu), Aleksandar Milutinovic (fotograf v istem muzeju) ter Milan Čukvas (v tistem obdobju študent paleontologije). Saša Kujic, takrat študent medicine, je bil v veliko pomoč pri konzervaciji kostnih in zobnih najdb. Tony Stuart in Adrian Lister sta omogočila AMS-datiranje vzorcev iz Baranice kot del njunega preučevanja izumrtij mega-favne; zaradi tega jima na tem mestu izrekam posebno zahvalo. zahvaljujem se tudi Ministrstvu za zananost in tehnološki razvoj Republike Srbije, ki financira projekt "Kultura Lepenskog Vira: kulturni procesi i transformacije u periodu od IX do VI mileni-juma p.n.e.", v okviru katerega smo analizirali živalske kosti, kot tudi Univerzi v Beogradu, fakulteti za rudarstvo in geologijo, Oddelku za paleontologijo ter filozofski fakulteti, Oddelku za arheologijo, ki sta poskrbela za vse potrebne pogoje za raziskavo favne. Prevod: Borut Toškan REFERENCES / LITERATURA ARGANT, A. 1991, Carnivores Quaternaires de Bourgogne. - Document des Laboratoires de Géologie de l'Université de Lyon 115, Lyon. ARGANT, J. and / in V. DIMITRIJEVIC 2007, Pollen analyses of Pleistocene hyaena coprolites from Montenegro and Serbia. - Geološki anali Balkanskog poluostrva 68, 73-80. BONIFAY, M.-F. 1971, Carnivores Quaternaires du Sud-Est de la France. - In / V: Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle C 21/2, 43-337, Paris. BRUGAL, J.-P., P. FOSSE and / in J.-L. GUADELLI 1997, Comparative study of bone assemblages made by recent and Plio-Pleistocene Hyaenids. - In / V: L. A. Han-nus, L. Rossum, R. P. Winham (eds. / ur.), Proceedings of the 1993 Bone Modification Conference, Hot Springs, South Dakota. Archeology laboratory, Augustana College, Occassional publication 1, 158-187, Sioux Falls. DAVIS, S. 2002, The mammals and birds from the Gruta do Caldeirâo, Portugal. - Revista Portuguesa de Arqueologia 5/2, 29-98. DIEDRICH, C. 2006, Ice age spotted hyenas ?hunt-ing or only scavenging the cave bear Ursus spelaeus Rosenmuller at the ice age spotted hyena open air den and prey deposit site Bad Wildungen-Biedensteg (Hes-sia, Germany). - In / V: E. S. Tsoukala, G. Rabeder (eds. / ur.), Proceedings of the 12th International Cave Bear Symposium, 2-5 November 2006, Thessaloniki and Aridea, Scientific Annals School of Geology, Aristotle university of Thessaloniki, spec. vol. 98, 193-199, Thessaloniki. DIMITRIJEVIC, V. 1991, Quaternary Mammals of the Smolucka cave in Southwest Serbia. - Palaeontologia Jugoslavica 41, Zagreb. DIMITRIJEVIC, V. 1992, Fosilna fauna Prekonoške pečine. - In / V: Kulturna istorija Svrljiga 2, Jezik, kultura i civilizacija, 65-68, Svrljig. DIMITRIJEVIC, V. 1994, Paleontološka istraživanja Petničke pečine (iskopavanja 1992.godine). - In / V: Zbornik Odbora za kras i speleologiju SANU 5, Posebna izdanja 622, Odeljenje prirodno-matematičkih nauka 69, 99-107, Beograd. DIMITRIJEVIC, V. 1997a, Pleistocenska sisar-ska fauna istočne Srbije. - In / V: M. Lazič (ed. / ur.), Arheologija Istočne Srbije, Zbornik radova, Centar za arheološka istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta, 45-53, Beograd. DIMITRIJEVIC, V. 1997b, Upper Pleistocene mammals from cave deposits of Serbia. - Geološki anali Balkanskogpoluostrva 61/2, 179-370. DIMITRIJEVIC, V. 1998, Fossil Remains of Vertebrates in Serbian Cave Deposits. - In / V: P. Djurovič (ed. / ur.), Speleološki atlas Srbije / Speleological Atlas of Serbia, Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti, Beogradski institut "Jovan Cvijič", Posebna izdanja / Special Issues 52, 51-57, Beograd. DIMITRIJEVIC, V., J. CAVIC-LJUBOJEVIC and / in K. BOGICEVIC 2001, Cave bear (Ursus spelaeus Rosenmuller & Heinroth) males' den from Velika pečina in Duboka near Kučevo (Eastern serbia). - Geološki anali Balkanskog poluostrva 64 (2002), 153-165. GAVELA, B. 1988, Paleolit Srbije. - Arandelovac, Beograd. KEMPE, S., A. AL-MALABEH, D. DOPPES, M. FREHAT, H.-V. HENSCHEL and / in W. ROSENDAHL 2006, Hyena Caves in Jordan. - In / V: E. S. Tsoukala, G. Rabeder (eds. / ur.), Proceedings of the 12th International Cave Bear Symposium. 2-5 November 2006, Thessaloniki and Aridea, Scientific Annals School of Geology, Aristotle university of Thessaloniki, spec. vol. 98, 201-212, Thessaloniki. KLEIN, R. G. and / in K. SCOTT 1989, Glacial/Interglacial size variation in fossil spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) from Britain. - Quaternary Research 32, 88-95. KRUUK, H. 1972, The Spotted Hyaena. - Chicago. KURTEN, B. 1957, The bears and hyenas of the interglacials. - Quaternaria 4, 69-81. LAZAREVIC, R., M. MALEZ and / in A. ORLIC 1988, Kronostratigrafski položaj fosilnih vertebrata u spilji Ceremošnji kod Kučeva u Srbiji. - Naš Krš 14/24-25, 81-88. LISTER, A. and / in A. STUART 2008, The impact of climate change on large mammal distribution and extinction: Evidence from the last glacial/interglacial transition. - Geoscience 340, 615-620. MALEZ, M. and / in S. SALKOVIC 1988, Kvartarnogeološki i paleontološki odnosi u Pečini iznad Hajdučkog izvora kod Citluka nedaleko Sokobanje (SR Srbija). - Naš Krš 14/24-25, 89-99. MIHAILOVIC, B. 2008, The Gravettian Site Šalitrena Pečina near Mionica (western Serbia). - In / V: A. Darlas, D. Mihailovič (eds. / ur.), The Palaeolithic of the Balkans, Proceedings of the XV UISPP World Congress (Lisbon, 4-9 Septembre 2006), vol. 17, Session C33, BAR International Series 1819, 101-106, Oxford. MIHAILOVIC, D. 1998, Praistorijska pečinska nalazišta. - In / V: P. Djurovič (ed. / ur.), Speleološki atlas Srbije / Speleological Atlas of Serbia, Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti, Beogradski institut "Jovan Cvijič", Posebna izdanja / Special Issues 52, 85-88, Beograd. MIHAILOVIC, D. 2008, New data about the Middle Palaeolithic of Serbia. - In / V: A. Darlas, D. Mihailovič (eds. / ur.), The Palaeolithic ofthe Balkans, Proceedings of the XV UISPP World Congress (Lisbon, 4-9 Septembre 2006), vol. 17, Session C33, BAR International Series 1819, 93-100, Oxford. MIHAILOVIC, D., L. DJURICiC and / in Z. KALUDJEROVIC 1997, Istraživanje paleolita na području Istočne Srbije. - In / V: M. Lazič (ed. / ur.), Arheologija Istočne Srbije, Zbornik radova, Centar za arheološka istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta, 45-53, Beograd. MIHAILOVIC, D. and / in B. MIHAILOVIC 2003, The Palaeolithic Site Hadži Prodan's Cave by Ivanjica. -Arheološki pregled Srpskog arheološkog društva 1(2006), 13-16. RAKOVEC, I. 1965, Pleistocenska sesalska favna iz Risovače pri Arandjelovcu (Pleistocene mammalian fauna from Risovača near Arandjelovac). - Razprave IV. razreda SAZU 8, 223-317. ROHLAND, N., j. POLLACK, D. NAGEL, C. BEAUVAL, I. AIRVAUX, S. PAABO and / in M. HOFREITER 2005, The Population History of Extant and Extinct Hyenas. - Molecular Biology and Evolution 22/12, 2435-2443. SLADIC, M. and / in S. jOVANOVIC 1995, Sondažno rekognosciranje pecinskih staništa na području Knjaževca. - Glasnik Srpskog arheološkog društva 11, 228-232. STINER, M. 1994, Honor among Thieves: A Zooar-chaeological Study of Neandertal Ecology. - Princeton. STINER, M. 2004, Comparative ecology and taphonomy of spotted hyenas, humans, and wolves in Pleistocene Italy. - Revue de Paléobiologie 23/2, 771-785. TRIfUNOVlC, M., 2004, Pečinski sistem u paleozojskim mermerima kod Brezovice (Trstenik), novootkriveni objekat geonasledja. - Zaštita prirode 55/1-2, 57-67. SEX AND SIZE OF THE KRAPINA CAVE BEARS SPOL IN VELIKOST KRAPINSKIH JAMSKIH MEDVEDOV Preston T. MIRACLE Abstract Krapina, world-famous for its large and variable Neandertal fossils, is also a key site for examining Neandertal lifeways and environments during the last interglacial period (MiS 5e, approximately 130,000 BP). The largest sample of vertebrates at Krapina comes from the cave bear (Ursus spelaeus). This study presents a detailed analysis of the sex structure of the Krapina cave bear assemblage and compares it to other sites in the region. The Krapina cave bear assemblage is overwhelmingly dominated by males (frequency of males from 63.6-100%, depending on the element analysed), and the male bias is found in the head, teeth, and major limb bones. Krapina was primarily used by prime-aged to old-adult male cave bears, once the rockshelter had mostly filled with sediment eroded from the shelter roof and wall (Miracle 2007). Contrasts in body size between Krapina and nearby sites, after sexual dimorphism is taken into account, are significant and striking. The Krapina male cave bears are smaller than male cave bears from Divje babe i facies A (MiS 3) and Divje babe i facies C (MiS 5a-d). The small size of the Krapina male cave bears is best understood as an adaptation to a full interglacial climate. These results suggest that Krapina's stratigraphy extended neither into later substages of the last interglacial (e.g. MiS 5a-d) nor into the last glacial (MiS 3-4). Temporal changes at Krapina in subsistence activities, stone tool production, and site use (Miracle 2007) occurred over a relatively short time period; Neandertals were behaviourally flexible and shifted their activities and strategies in response to local conditions and opportunities. Keywords: Krapina, Divje babe, cave bear, Pleistocene, sexual dimorphism, body size, Croatia, Slovenia, palaeontology Izvleček Krapina, ki je svetovno slavo dosegla s svojim obsežnim in pestrim vzorcem neandertalskih fosilov, je tudi ključno najdišče za razumevanje načina življenja te izumrle vrste človečnjakov ter okolja v zadnji medledeni dobi (MIS 5e) pred približno 130.000 leti. Vendar pa predmet tega prispevka ni neandertalec, temveč jamski medved (Ursus spelaeus), najbolje zastopan vretenčar v najdišču. Rezultati detajlne analize spolne strukture krapinskih medvedov so pokazali na izrazito prevlado samcev (njihov delež niha med 63,3 in 100 %, odvisno od analiziranega skeletnega elementa), in to tako pri najdbah glave in zob kot tudi kosti okončin. Potem ko so spodmol v večjem delu zapolnili sedimenti, ki so nastali z erodiranjem stropa, so najdišče očitno povečini uporabljali mladi odrasli do odrasli medvedi (Miracle 2007). Analiza velikosti je pokazala na obstoj značilnih, od spolnega dimorfizma neodvisnih razlik v velikosti živali iz Krapine v primerjavi s tistimi iz sosednjih najdišč. Kot se je namreč izkazalo, so samci iz Krapine po svojih dimenzijah zaostajali tako za primerki istega spola iz Divjih bab I - facies A (MIS 3) kot tudi za tistimi iz faciesa C (MIS 5a-d). Majhnost krapinskih jamskih medvedov lahko najbolje razložimo kot prilagoditev na klimatske razmere visokega interglaciala. Iz navedenega gre torej sklepati, da v Krapini manjkajo tako sedi-menti iz kasnejših faz zadnjega interglaciala (npr. MIS 5a-d) kot tudi tisti iz zadnjega glaciala (MIS 3-4). V primeru obravnavanega najdišča je do časovnih sprememb v njegovi uporabi, v aktivnostih, ki so zagotavljale obstanek, ter v izdelavi kamnitih orodij prišlo v razmeroma kratkem času; neandertalci so bili očitno vedenjsko prožni, tako da so lahko spreminjali svoje dejavnosti in strategije odvisno od vsakokratnih lokalnih razmer in možnosti. Ključne besede Krapina, Divje babe I, jamski medved, pleistocen, spolni dimorfizem, velikost telesa INTRODUCTION UVOD Every since their discovery over a century ago, Krapina's world-famous Neandertals have commanded the palaeoanthropological spotlight. The almost 1000 Neandertal fossils have contributed immeasurably to our knowledge of Neandertal morphology and behaviour owing to their variability and diversity (Gorjanovic-Kramberger 1906; Smith 1976; Radovcic et al. 1988; Prayer 2006). Recently the archaeological context of these remains has received greater attention through detailed studies of the Mousterian stone tools (Simek 1991; Simek, Smith 1997) and the palaeontology and zooarchaeology of the animal remains (Miracle 2007). The stone artefacts and animal remains are proving to be a rich and productive source of new information and insight about how Neandertals behaved as well as their subsistence practices, social organization, and interactions with their surroundings. Without wishing to take anything away from the Krapina Neandertals, it is important to note that numerically the most important taxon in the Krapina collections is the cave bear (Miracle 2007, 10), even though many of the ribs, vertebrae, and limb extremities published in the first faunal list (Gorjanovic-Kramberger 1901, 177 f) are now missing from the faunal collection. Because bears and hominins were sympatric species over hundreds of thousands of years in Europe, and owing to their shared (time-shared?) use of caves and rock overhangs for shelter and habitation, the ecology of one has important implications for the other (Gamble 1986; Miracle 1991; Stiner et al. 1998). The Krapina cave bear assemblage is thus interesting in its own right as well as for the information it provides about the context of Neandertal activities and occupations. A basic morphological and metrical description of the cave bear remains from Krapina has been recently presented in the context of taphonomic and zoo-archaeological analyses (Miracle 2007). The Krapina cave bear assemblage showed highly skewed sex and age profiles, and it was concluded that "the last major phase of occupation at Krapina (layer 9) [was not by Neandertals but by] ... prime-adult to old male cave bears" (Miracle 2007, 236). There is no evidence of hominin involvement in the accumulation or modification of cave bear remains. Thus "internecine killing may have been a common source of [cave bear] mortality; in such cases Krapina was heavily contested by bears as a den" (Miracle 2007, 236). It was also suggested that the changing composition and character of the cave bear-dominated assemblage in layer 9 at Krapina suggested that sedimentation continued beyond full interglacial conditions of Marine Isotope Substage (MIS) 5e into a stadial (MIS 5d) marked by a somewhat cooler and more arid climate (Miracle 2007, 216). Increased intraspecific competition among cave bears Vse od samega odkritja pred več kot stoletjem so svetovno znani krapinski neandertalci v središču paleo-antropološkega zanimanja. Skoraj 1000 razpoložljivih fosilnih najdb je spričo svoje variabilnosti in raznolikosti ogromno prispevalo k našemu poznavanju morfologije in vedenja neandertalcev (Gorjanovic-Kramberger 1906; Smith 1976; Radovčic et al. 1988; Frayer 2006). V zadnjem času se je več pozornosti namenjalo arheološkemu kontekstu navedenih najdb. Med drugim so bila npr. analizirana musterjenska kamnita orodja (Simek 1991; Simek, Smith 1997), opravljeni pa sta bili tudi paleontološka in arheozoološka študija favnističnega gradiva (Miracle 2007). tako kamnita orodja kot tudi živalski ostanki so se pokazali kot bogat in ploden vir novih spoznanj o neandertalčevem vedenju, aktivnostih, ki so mu zagotavljale obstanek, socialni organiziranosti ter interakciji z okolico. Ne da bi želeli v čemer koli zmanjšati pomen kra-pinskih neandertalcev, pa se zdi na tem mestu vendarle pomembno poudariti, da je kvantitativno najpomembnejši takson v gradivu iz obravnavanega najdišča vendarle jamski medved (Miracle 2007). In to navkljub temu, da so se številni ostanki reber, vretenc in kosti spodnjih delov okončin, ki so sicer navedeni na prvem seznamu favnističnih najdb (Gorjanovic-Kramberger 1901, 177s), kasneje izgubili in danes niso več sestavni del obstoječe zbirke. Glede na to, da so bili evropski hominini in medvedi stotisočletja simpatrični, pri čemer so oboji (časovno deljeno?) uporabljali jame in spodmole za zavetišče in bivališče, je imela ekologija enih pomembne implikacije za druge (Gamble 1986; Miracle 1991; Stiner et al. 1998). Krapinski jamski medved je torej zanimiv že sam po sebi, ob tem pa seveda ponuja tudi spoznanja o kontekstu neandertalčevih aktivnosti in bivanja v jami. Krajši morfološki in metrični opis ostankov jamskega medveda iz Krapine je bil predstavljen že v okviru nedavno objavljenih tafonomske in zooarheološke študije živalskega gradiva iz navedenega najdišča (Miracle 2007). Rezultati so pokazali na izrazito asimetrično porazdeljenost najdb med oba spola oz. med posamezne starostne razrede ter tako privedli do sklepa, da "so med zadnjo izrazitejšo poselitveno fazo v Krapini (plast 9) tam [namesto neandertalcev] ... prevladovali mladi odrasli do stari samci jamskega medveda" (Miracle 2007, 236). Ker na ostankih ni bilo opaziti nikakršnih indicev za domnevo o aktivni vlogi homininov pri njihovem kopičenju oz. procesiranju, je bila omenjena tudi možnost, da so "pomemben vir smrtnosti [pri jamskem medvedu] predstavljali medsebojni spopadi; to bi seveda pričalo o ogorčenem boju za prezimovanje v obravnavanem spodmolu" (Miracle 2007, 236). V isti publikaciji je tudi omenjeno, da bi spreminjajoča se sestava in značaj skupka favnističnih ostankov iz plasti 9 lahko kazali na nadaljevanje sedimentacije v Krapini tudi še po koncu at Krapina thus appears to have occurred in a context of deteriorating climatic conditions. This ecological interpretation of the Krapina cave bears rests on somewhat shaky foundations. First of all, collection and curation biases have had a major impact on the Krapina cave bear assemblage. Although it has been argued that the presence of heavily worn and fragmentary teeth indicates that there was not a curatorial preference for the relatively larger remains of adult male cave bears, there is no corroborating evidence of a male-skewed sex ratio other than the relatively large number of cave bear baccula (Miracle 2007, 61 f). The second wobbly support comes from the chronology. Electron spin resonance (ESR) dates on rhino teeth date the deposits to ca. 130,000 ± 10,000 B.P. (Rink et al. 1995), which falls within Marine Isotope Substage (MIS) 5e. Given that the MIS 5e/5d transition occurred about 115 ka (Lowe, Walker 1997, 327), the existing chronometric dates from Krapina can be used to support both a "short stratigraphy", in which deposition occurred only during MIS 5e, and a "long stratigraphy" in which deposition extended into MIS 5d. Large mammals have shown dramatic changes in body size that correlate with global changes in temperature; especially striking is the decrease in body size across the Pleistocene-Holocene transition (Kurten 1965; Davis 1981). Kurten (1968, 123) reported that Eemian forms of cave bear were "on average somewhat smaller than the full-fledged cave bears of the last glaciation." Hence one could use the size of the Krapina cave bears to address the issue of chronology. Cave bears that lived at a time of full interglacial conditions (e.g. MIS 5e) should be smaller than those that died under stadial (e.g. MIS 5d) or glacial (e.g. MIS 2-4) conditions. Because cave bears were highly sexually dimorphic (Kurten 1955), one needs to control for sex before one can compare body size. The degrees of sexual dimorphism and body size are population specific; they can change over space and time in response to various environmental factors. Furthermore, the quality of interpretations of sexual dimorphism and body size depends on assemblage homogeneity and size. The homogeneity of the Krapina cave bear assemblage is difficult to address; although the assemblage probably represents a single regional population, there is little control of the time span over which it could have been sampled. Although sedimentation at Krapina appears to have been episodic and most of the cave bear remains appear to have come from a single depositional layer (Miracle 2007, 5), the remains could have accumulated over decades, centuries, or even millennia. Thus the potential impact of assemblage homogeneity and heterogeneity must be acknowledged even if it cannot be evaluated. The goals of this study are to analyse in detail the sex structure of the Krapina cave bear assemblages and to compare the Krapina bear assemblages to other sites visokointerglacialnih razmer morske izotopske pod-stopnje (= MIS; Marine Isotope Substage) 5e v nekoliko hladnejši in bolj sušen stadial MIS 5d (Miracle 2007, 216). V skladu s tem bi lahko povečanje konkurence med jamskimi medvedi za prezimovanje (pri medvedih ne gre za pravo zimsko spanje/hibrnacijo, marveč prej za dremež) v krapinskem spodmolu umestili v kontekst poslabšanja klimatskih razmer. Ekološka interpretacija krapinskih jamskih medvedov stoji na nekoliko majavih nogah. Kot prvi razlog za to velja navesti pristranskost pri pobiranju in konzerviranju najdb, kar je nedvomno imelo velik negativen vpliv na vsebino obstoječe zbirke kosti in zob. Čeprav naj bi prisotnost močno obrabljenih zob pričala o tem, da kustosi med urejanjem zbirke niso dajali prednosti dobro ohranjenim velikim ostankom odraslih samcev, pa z izjemo dokaj številnih ostankov penilnih kosti (os penis) drugih očitnih dokazov za razmerje, nagnjeno v izrazito prid samcem, med spoloma pravzaprav ni (Miracle 2007, 61 s). Drugo težavo predstavlja kronologija. Datacije no-sorogovih zob, pridobljene s tehniko elektronske spinske resonance (ESR; Electron Spin Resonance), so pokazale na starost pribl. 130.000 ± 10.000 BP (Rink et al. 1995), kar sovpada z MIS 5e. Ker naj bi do prehoda MIS 5e v 5d prišlo pred pribl. 115.000 leti (Lowe, Walker 1997, 327), lahko kronometrične datume iz Krapine razumemo kot argument v prid tako "kratki stratigrafiji", po kateri naj bi sedimentacija potekala zgolj v MIS 5e, kot tudi "dolgi stratigrafiji", v skladu s katero naj bi se sedimentacija nadaljevala še tudi v MIS 5d. Globalne spremembe v temperaturah so na nivoju velikih sesalcev odsevale v očitnih spremembah velikosti živali; še posebej izstopajoč v tem smislu je bil upad velikosti na prehodu iz pleistocena v holocen (Kurten 1965; Davis 1981). Po poročanju Kurtena (1968, 123) naj bi bili jamski medvedi iz zadnjega inter-glaciala "v povprečju nekoliko manjši od povsem odraslih primerkov iz zadnjega glaciala". Glede na navedeno bi torej kronološko problematiko lahko pomagali pojasniti tudi podatki o velikosti krapinskih jamskih medvedov. Živali iz visokega interglaciala so namreč po velikosti domnevno zaostajale za tistimi, ki so živele v razmerah stadialne (npr. MIS 5d) ali glacialne (npr. MIS 2-4) klime. Jamski medved izkazuje očiten spolni dimorfizem (Kurten 1955), zato študije velikosti brez predhodne razvrstitve analiziranih ostankov med oba spola niso smiselne. Pri tem sta seveda tako izraženost spolnega dimorfizma kot tudi sama velikost živali populacijsko specifični; v prostoru in času sta spremenljivi, pač v odvisnosti od različnih okoljskih dejavnikov. Poleg tega je kvaliteta interpretacije podatkov o spolnem dimorfizmu in telesni velikosti odvisna tudi od obsega in homogenosti analiziranega gradiva, kar pa je v primeru Krapine težko oceniti. Čeprav obravnavani vzorec namreč najverjetneje vključuje ostanke zgolj ene regijske populacije, pa ni zanesljivih podatkov o tem, kako dolgo so se ti dejansko from the region. The focus is on the major limb bones to investigate the degree of sexual dimorphism in these populations and evidence of contrasts in body size between these sites after sexual dimorphism has been taken into account. These analyses are used to answer two main questions: 1. Do cave bear long-bones from Krapina show a male-skewed sex ratio similar to that observed in the canine teeth? What are the implications of these results for interpretations of cave bear ecology at Krapina? 2. How large were the Krapina cave bears compared to cave bears from nearby sites of known age? What are the implications of these results for interpretations of the chronology of Krapina? KRAPINA STRATIGRAPHY AND CAVE BEARS Krapina is a rockshelter located at 120 m a.s.l. in Miocene sandstone on the northeastern slope of Hušnjakovo hill about 25 m above the Krapinica River (Fig. 1). The site was excavated from 1899-1905 by Dragutin Gorjanovic-Kramberger (Gorjanovic-Kramberger 1906; Radovčic 1988). The rockshelter contained a sequence of over 9 metres of deposit. The lowermost metre consisted of mostly fluvial sediments, although there were some lenses bearing stone artefacts and animal remains; together they were labelled as "layer 1" . The overlying 8 metres of allocthonous cave sediments contained 8 visible cultural layers that in section appear as darker bands that were presumably rich in ash, charcoal, and archaeological remains. These layers were numbered layer 2 (lowest) to layer 9 (uppermost). Gorjanovic published brief observations about the Krapina bears, focussing on evidence of pathologies on the cave bear bones (GorjanoviC-Kramberger 1902). Later he briefly considered the implications of the faunal remains for Neandertal subsistence (GorjanoviC-Kramberger 1913, 36 f). He suggested that cave bears died at the site of their own accord, noting that many of the cave bear bones showed evidence of osteoarthritis and old age. Although only 12 of these remains were marked with stratigraphic information (layers 1, 5-6, 7, and 9), GorjanoviC (GorjanoviC-Kramberger 1913, 2) noted that remains of cave bears were dominant in the uppermost part of the sequence (layer 9), as he also indicated on stratigraphic sections (GorjanoviC-Kramberger 1901, 173; Malez 1970a, Profile 4, Prilog 1-2). The cave bear (Ursus spelaeus) is represented by a NISP of 365 and MNI1 of 12 based on the upper C; a relatively large number of these remains are measurable (Miracle 2007, 30). The Krapina cave bear assemblage contains all parts of the skeleton, although the 1 NISP - Number of Identified Specimens; MNI - Minimum number of individuals. kopičili v spodmolu. Res je, da je bila sedimentacija v Kra-pini najbrž epizodična in da večji del medvedjih ostankov izvira iz iste plasti (Miracle 2007, 5), a ti so se vendarle lahko kopičili desetletja, stoletja ali celo tisočletja trajajoče obdobje. Morebitnega vpliva homogenosti oz. heteroge-nosti analiziranega favnističnega skupka se je torej treba vsekakor zavedati, čeprav ga sicer ne moremo oceniti. Namen prispevka je bil natančno preučiti spolno strukturo krapinskih jamskih medvedov in jo primerjati s spolnimi strukturami, ki se nanašajo na medvede iz drugih najdišč v regiji. Poudarek je bil na dolgih kosteh okončin, pri čemer so nas zanimale tudi stopnja izraže-nosti spolnega dimorfizma v obravnavanih populacijah ter morebitne razlike v telesni velikosti medvedov iz različnih najdišč (seveda ob upoštevanju spola). V tukaj predstavljeni študiji smo torej iskali odgovora na naslednji osrednji vprašanji: 1. Ali tudi med dolgimi kostmi iz Krapine prevladujejo primerki samcev, tako kot je bilo to že ugotovljeno pri podočnikih? Kakšne so implikacije teh rezultatov za interpretacijo ekologije krapinskih jamskih medvedov? 2. Kako veliki so bili krapinski jamski medvedi v primerjavi s tistimi znane starosti iz drugih naj dišč v regiji? Kakšne so implikacije teh rezultatov za kronologijo Krapine? STRATIGRAFIJA KRAPINE IN JAMSKI MEDVEDI Krapina je spodmol, ki se je na nadmorski višini 120 m oblikoval v miocenskem peščenjaku severovzhodnega pobočja Hušnjakovega hriba, kakšnih 25 m nad strugo reke Krapinice (sl. 1). V letih 1899-1905 je na najdišču izkopaval Dragutin GorjanoviC-Kramberger (GorjanoviC-Kramberger 1906; RadovčiC 1988). V spodmolu je bilo dokumentiranih več kot devet metrov odloženega materiala. Najglobljo plast okvirne debeline enega metra sestavljajo večinoma fluvialni sedimenti, čeprav so bile vmes odkrite tudi posamezne leče s kamnitimi artefakti in živalskimi ostanki; oboje skupaj predstavlja "plast 1". Preostalih osem metrov sedimentnega zaporedja sestavljajo alohtoni jamski sedimenti. Prepoznati je bilo mogoče osem kulturnih plasti, ki so v profilu videti kot temnejše proge, domnevno bogate s pepelom, ogljem in arheološkimi najdbami. Te plasti so bile oštevilčene od 2 (najgloblja plast) do 9 (najvišja plast). GorjanoviC je svoje ugotovitve o krapinskih jamskih medvedih strnil v krajše poročilo, s poudarkom na patoloških primerkih kosti (GorjanoviC-Kramberger 1902). Kasneje se je na kratko ustavil še pri implikacijah živalskih ostankov za strategijo preživetja neandertalcev (GorjanoviC-Kramberger 1913, 36 s). Sklepal je, da za pogin jamskih medvedov niso bili odgovorni ljudje; med izkopanimi kostmi je bilo namreč veliko takih, ki so pripadale bolnim (osteoartritis) ali ostarelim živalim. Čeprav so bili za zgolj dvanajst od teh kosti znani Fig. 1: Map of the region showing the location of Krapina, Divje babe 1, and other important sites. Sl. 1: Zemljevid območja s Krapino, Divjimi babami I ter drugimi pomembnejšimi najdišči. axial skeleton, with the exception of the bacculum, is under-represented relative to the appendicular skeleton (Miracle 2007, 79). Some of this pattern is owing to a curatorial bias; many of the axial remains have disappeared from the collection since Gorjanovic's original inventory in 1901 (Miracle 2007, 9). However, if one compares the frequency of major limbs to the boney parts of the head, one finds that upper and lower limbs are present in similar numbers to heads (Miracle 2007, 79 f). These data suggest that complete cave bear skeletons were deposited at Krapina. There is little evidence of modification of cave bear bones by either carnivores (1.1% ofbone NISP gnawed) or hominins (2.2% ofbone NISP with cut marks), and over 75% of the cave bear bones are whole (Miracle 2007, 80). Owing to the rather modest size of the Krapina cave bear assemblage, the standard approach of searching for bimodal distributions of measurements, whether using univariate, bivariate, or multivariate techniques, has proven to be inapplicable. Therefore it has been necessary to compare the dimensions of the Krapina cave bear limb bones to much larger assemblages from stratigrafski podatki (plasti 1, 5-6, 7 in 9), je Gorjanovič (Gorjanovič-Kramberger 1913, 2) prevlado ostankov jamskega medveda v zgornjem delu sedimentnega stolpca (plast 9) vseeno opazil in to tudi ustrezno označil na stratigrafskem profilu (Gorjanovič-Kramberger 1901, 173; Malez 1970a, profil 4, prilogi 1-2). Danes obsega zbirka ostankov jamskega medveda (Ursus speleaus) iz Krapine 365 najdb (NISP = 365), ki so - sodeč po podočnikih - pripadale najmanj dvanajstim živalim (MNI1 = 12; Miracle 2007, 30). V gradivu so zastopani vsi skeletni elementi, so pa kosti osnega skeleta - z izjemo penilne - manj številne od tistih pri-vesnega skeleta (Miracle 2007, 79). Delno so za navedeno neravnovesje odgovorni kustosi zbirke; mnogi ostanki osnega skeleta, ki jih je Gorjanovič vključil v svoj popis najdb iz leta 1901, so namreč kasneje izginili (Miracle 2007, 9). Po drugi strani pa primerjava frekvence pojavljanja večjih kosti okončin in koščenih delov glave kaže, da je zastopanost ostankov prednjih in zadnjih 1 NISP - število določenih primerkov (Number of Identified Specimens)-, MNI - najmanjše število živali (Minimum number of individuals). nearby sites in Slovenia (Pacher et al. 2004; Turk 2007), several caves in the Eastern Alps (Reisinger, Hohenegger 1998), as well as to a large sample of cave bears from Spain (Torres et al. 1991). The site of Divje babe I provides a particularly important assemblage for comparisons. Recent, state-of-the-art research on Divje babe I has provided excellent and detailed information about cave bear and hominin activities at the site (Turk 2007). Divje babe I is relatively close to Krapina (150 km) and has a long sequence spanning from MIS 5a-d to MIS 3 (Blackwell et al. 2007). Furthermore, the cave bear assemblage from Divje babe I is large and has been published in detail (Jambrešič, Turk 2007; Toškan 2007a; 2007b). The Divje babe I cave bears are thus an ideal sample to compare to Krapina. CAVE BEAR SEX RATIO 15.75 16.25 16.75 17.25 17.75 18.25 18.75 19.25 19.75 20.25 20.75 21.25 21.75 Canine breath (mm) / širina podočnika (mm) Fig. 2: Histogram of the upper and lower canine breadths of cave bears from Krapina. Canine breadth measured buccal-lingually at the base of the crown. Data from Miracle (2007, Tabs. 16 and 17). Sl. 2: Histogram za širino zgornjih in spodnjih podočnikov krapinskih jamskih medvedov. Širina podočnikov je merjena bukalno-lingvalno na bazi krone. Vir podatkov: Miracle (2007, tab. 16-17). Cave bears were highly sexually dimorphic and this dimorphism is particularly apparent in the dimensions of the canines (Koby 1949; Kurten 1955). Kurten (1955; 1976) argued that lower canine breadths in cave bears at the Würm cave sites of Mixnitz and Odessa were bimodal with modes at 16-17 mm and 21-22 mm, and with a little overlap between these distributions in the range of 18-20 mm. One expects the exact position of these modes to vary with populations of smaller versus larger-sized bears, and the degree of sexual dimorphism may also vary among populations (Grandal-dAnglade, Lopez-Gonzalez 2005). Even over a distance as short as 400 km in Hokkaido, Japan, there is a significant cline in recent brown bear skull sizes that may be related to climate, diet, and/or growth rates (Ohdachi et al. 1992). To interpret the Krapina data I have thus sought comparative data from relatively nearby sites. At Mokriška jama in Slovenia, there is a bimodal distribution of upper and lower canine breadths with very little overlap between the modes in the range of 17.5-19 mm, and on the basis of this distribution Debeljak (2007, 477) classified remains smaller than 18 mm as female and those larger than 18.5 mm as male. Similar means of canine breadths for females and males are also present at the nearby site of Potočka zijalka in Slovenia (Debeljak 2004, 178). The histogram of cave bear upper and lower canine breadths at Krapina may be bimodal with a main mode at 17.75-19.25 mm and a smaller second mode between 15.75-16.75 mm (Fig. 2). The primary mode at Krapina is exactly in between the modes identified at Mixnitz, Odessa, and Mokriška jama. Identification of a second mode in the histogram is made difficult by the small sample size. One explanation of the Krapina distribution is that the sample is composed of larger-than-average females and smaller-than-average males, which is to say that the population was not sexually dimorphic. This explanation seems unlikely given the clear evidence of nog - glede na glavo - primerljiva (Miracle 2007, 79 s). v Krapini so torej očitno ležali celi skeleti jamskih medvedov. Število kosti s sledmi delovanja zveri (obgrizenih je 1,1 % medvedjih ostankov) oz. homininov (urezi so prisotni na 2,2 % medvedjih najdb) je pičlo. Na drugi strani je delež nepoškodovanih, v celoti ohranjenih kosti kar 75-odstoten NISP (Miracle 2007, 80). Standardne metode za preučevanje biomodalne porazdelitve metričnih podatkov - najsi bodo to uni-variatne, bivariatne ali pa multivariatne - so se v primeru Krapine izkazale za neuporabne, saj je bil vzorec za kaj takega preprosto preskromen. Namesto tega je bilo treba dimenzije kosti okončin krapinskih jamskih medvedov primerjati z obsežnejšimi vzorci iz bližnjih najdišč na Slovenskem (Pacher et al. 2004; turk 2007), iz več vzhodnoalpskih jam (Reisinger, Hohenegger 1998) ter z bogatim gradivom iz Španije (torres et al. 1991). Divje babe I so v tem smislu še posebej pomembne, saj so sodobne raziskave zadnjih let omogočile odlično in detajlno sliko medvedjih in človekovih aktivnosti v jami (turk 2007). Najdišče je razmeroma malo oddaljeno od Krapine (pribl. 150 km) in obsega najdbe iz relativno dolgega obdobja od MIS 5a-d do MIS 3 (Blackwell et al. 2007). Dodano vrednost pomeni tudi že večkrat podrobno objavljen bogat vzorec ostankov jamskega medveda (Jambrešič, turk 2007; toškan 2007a; 2007b). Navedeno gradivo predstavlja torej idealno primerjavo vzorcu iz Krapine. RAZMERJE MED SPOLOMA PRI JAMSKEM MEDVEDU Jamski medved je bil izrazito spolno dimorfna vrsta, kar je še posebej očitno v velikosti podočnikov (Koby 1949; Kurten 1955). Kurten (1955; 1976) je tako npr. pokazal, da je bila porazdelitev podatkov o širini 22 2120 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 ■ Ursus spelaeus ^ ♦ ♦ . O \ ? ■ \ ♦ ^^ \ □ \ \ ♦ ■ ^ Ursus arctos 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 Canine lenght (mm) / dolžina podočnika (mm) ^ Upper C / zgornji C O Upper C, min / zgornji C, mia ■ Lower C / spodnji C □ Lower C, min / spodnji C, min A Lower C, brown bear / spodnji C, ijavi medved A Lower C, brown bear female/ spodnji C, samica ijavega medveda sexual dimorphism in other collections from Europe. A better explanation of this pattern is that the cave bears in the vicinity of Krapina during the last interglacial were sexually dimorphic and smaller in body size than cave bear populations from Wurmian contexts in other parts of Europe. A crossplot of canine breadth against canine length (Fig. 3), shows a break in the distribution of mesial-distal length at the base of the crown between 22-24 mm and a break in the buccal-lingual breadth at the base of the crown between 17-18 mm. Sexual dimorphism is the most likely explanation for these discontinuous distributions; canines with a breadth greater than 17 mm and a length greater than 23 mm are identified as male. Of 21 measurable canines from Krapina, 17 are sexed as male and 4 as female (Tab. 1). Fig. 3: Crossplot of upper and lower canine breadth on canine length (measured mesio-distally at the base of the crown) of cave bears from Krapina, brown bears from Krapina, and brown bears from other Pleistocene and Holocene sites in the Alps. Krapina data from Miracle (2007, Tabs. 16, 17, and 22). Alpine brown bear data from Doppes, Pacher (2005, Tab. 3). Sl. 3: Grafični prikaz razmerja med širino in dolžino (merjeno mezialno-distalno na bazi krone) zgornjih in spodnjih podočnikov krapinskih jamskih in rjavih medvedov ter rjavih medvedov z drugih pleistocenskih in holocenskih najdišč v Alpah. Vira podatkov: za krapinske primerke - Miracle (2007, tab. 16-17 ter 22); za alpske rjave medvede - Doppes, Pacher (2005, tab. 3). spodnjih podočnikov medvedov iz würmskih plasti jam Mixnitz in Odessa bimodalna, z modusoma pri 16-17 mm in 21-22 mm ter minimalnim prekrivanjem obeh porazdelitev med vrednostima 18 in 20 mm. Pričakovati seveda je, da navedeni podatki niso stalni, temveč se nekoliko spreminjajo v odvisnosti od velikosti medvedov na posameznem najdišču, pozabiti pa ne gre niti na določene medpopulacijske razlike v izrazitosti spolnega dimorfizma (Grandal-d'Anglade, Lopez-Gonzalez 2005). Pri recentnih rjavih medvedih z japonskega otoka Hokaido je bil tako že na razmeroma kratki razdalji 400 km opazen očiten trend spreminjanja velikosti lobanje, kar odseva klimo, prehrano in/ali stopnjo rasti (Ohdachi et al. 1992). Spričo navedenega so bila kot vir komparativnega gradiva za analizo kra-pinskega upoštevana zgolj najdišča iz razmeroma bližnje okolice. v primeru Mokriške jame je bilo pri bimodalni porazdelitvi podatkov o širini zgornjih in spodnjih podočnikov prekrivanje obeh krivulj na območju med modusoma (tj. med 17,5 in 19 mm) zelo majhno. Na tej podlagi je Debeljakova (2007, 477) primerke ožje od 18 mm pripisala samicam, širše od 18,5 mm pa samcem. Podobna slika je bila ugotovljena tudi za nedaleč stran ležeče jamsko najdišče Potočka zijalka (Debeljak 2004, 178). Pri jamskih medvedih iz Krapine histogram za širino zgornjih in spodnjih podočnikov kaže na bimo-dalno porazdelitev metričnih podatkov z modusoma pri 15,75-16,75 mm ter 17,75-19,25 mm (sl. 2). Slednji je Tab. 1: Sexual dimorphism in cave bear canine crown breadth. Data sources: Krapina (Miracle 2007, Tabs. 16 and 17); Divje babe 1 (Toškan 2007a, Tab. 15.1); Mokriška jama (Debeljak 2007, Fig. 2); Potočka zijalka (Debeljak 2004, 178). Tab. 1: Spolni dimorfizem pri širini krone podočnikov jamskih medvedov. Viri podatkov: Krapina (Miracle 2007, tab. 16-17); Divje babe 1 (Toškan 2007a, tab. 15.1); Mokriška jama (Debeljak 2007, sl. 2); Potočka zijalka (Debeljak 2004, 178). Females I samice Males I samci Site I najdišče Mean I povprečje s.d. Range I razpon N Mean I povprečje s.d. Range I razpon N Krapina 16.3 0.44 15.8 - 16.7 4 19.0 1.05 17.2 - 20.9 17 Divje babe 1 15.2 13.0 - 18.0 19.9 17.0 - 23.0 Mokriška jama 15.9 0.86 13.5 - 18.0 148 21.3 1.41 18.5 - 25.5 204 Potočka zijalka 16.6 14.5 - 18.5 17 21.5 19.0 - 24.0 51 Is this highly skewed sex ratio in favour of males also found in other cave bear elements at Krapina? Of the 10 measurable crania and cranial fragments (Miracle 2007, Tab. 14), five can be sexed as male and one as female on the basis of the associated canines. Two more cranial fragments (#271, 272) can be sexed as male on the basis of greatest mastoid breadth (215 mm and 204 mm, respectively); greatest mastoid breadth is the most dimorphic parameter on cave bear skulls, and the Krapina dimensions are beyond the female range and within the range of males from other sites in Europe (Grandal-d'Anglade, Lopez-Gonzalez 2005, Fig. 4). The two remaining measured skull fragments (#267, 271.1) come from relatively large individuals and are probably from males, although they do not preserve portions that are known to be particularly diagnostic (Miracle 2007, Tab. 14). Cave bears are also highly sexually dimorphic in limb bone length (Grandal-d'Anglade, Lopez-Gonzalez 2005, 326; Reisinger, Hohenegger 1998; Torres 1988a; 1988b). Dimensions of the Krapina cave bear limb bones (Miracle 2007, 67 ff, Tabs. 18-19) are compared directly to the much larger assemblage from the nearby site of Divje babe I, because of the close proximity of this assemblage as well as the detailed publication of measurements on individual specimens (jambrešic, Turk 2007). Comparisons are also made to assemblages from several caves in the Eastern Alps (Reisinger, Hohenegger 1998), as well as to a large sample of cave bears from Spain (Torres et al. 1991). 140n 135130125120- B .a iisH T3 « 110 105100 9590 C? ♦ ♦ • ♦ • •• t •♦ ♦ # Krapina ♦ Divje babe I 275 300 325 350 375 400 GL (mm) 425 450 475 Fig. 4: Crossplot of greatest distal breadth (Bd) against greatest length (GL) in cave bear humeri from Krapina and Divje babe I. Krapina data from Miracle (2007, Tab. 18). Divje babe I data from jambrešic, Turk (2007, Tab. 16.2a). Sl. 4: Grafični prikaz razmerja med največjo širino distalnega konca (Bd) in največjo dolžino (GL) nadlahtnic jamskih medvedov iz Krapine in Divjih bab I. Viri podatkov: za Kra-pino - Miracle (2007, tab. 18); za Divje babe I - jambrešic, Turk (2007, tab. 16.2a). nedvoumen in se umešča natanko med modalni vrednosti, ki sta bili ugotovljeni za gradivo iz najdišč Mixnitz, Odessa in Mokriška jama. V nasprotju s tem je modus pri 15,75-16,75 mm slabo prepoznaven, kar gre najbrž na račun preskromne velikosti vzorca. Ugotovljeno porazdelitev metričnih podatkov bi načeloma lahko razložili s tezo, da vzorec iz Krapine obsega ostanke nadpovprečno velikih samic in podpovprečno velikih samcev, oz. z drugimi besedami, tamkajšnja populacija jamskih medvedov pač ni bila spolno dimorfna. Ker pa bi to bil absolutno unikaten primer med evropskimi najdišči, se takšna razlaga ne zdi utemeljena. veliko verjetneje namreč je, da so bili seveda tudi krapinski jamski medvedi iz zadnjega interglaciala spolno dimorfni, pri čemer pa so tako samci kot samice po velikosti zaostajali za konspecifičnimi primerki iz wurmskih kontekstov z drugih najdišč po Evropi. Grafični prikaz razmerja med širno in dolžino podočnikov (sl. 3) kaže prekinitev v zveznosti porazdelitve podatkov o mezialno-distalni dolžini baze krone med vrednostima 22 in 24 mm; v primeru podatkov za bukalno-lingvalno širino baze krone je bila podobna prekinitev prepoznana pri vrednostih med 17 in 18 mm. Najverjetnejša razlaga za opisano nezveznost obeh porazdelitev je seveda spolni dimorfizem, pri čemer gre primerke s širino nad 17 mm in dolžino nad 23 mm pripisati samcem. od skupno 21 zadovoljivo ohranjenih in torej izmerljivih podočnikov iz Krapine jih je bilo takih kar 17, medtem ko so bile samice zastopane z zgolj štirimi primerki (tab. 1). je podobno izrazito asimetričnost v zastopanosti obeh spolov najti tudi pri drugih skeletnih elementih krapinskih jamskih medvedov? Od desetih izmerljivih primerkov lobanj oz. lobanjskih fragmentov (Miracle 2007, tab. 14) jih je bilo na podlagi dimenzij pripadajočih podočnikov samcem pripisanih pet, samicam pa ena. Nadaljnja dva fragmenta (#271, 272) sta bila kot ostanka samcev prepoznana na podlagi največje mastoidne širine 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 Bd (mm) Fig. 5: Histogram of greatest distal breadth (Bd) of cave bear humeri from Krapina and Divje babe I. Krapina data from Miracle (2007, Tab. 18). Divje babe I data from jambrešic, Turk (2007, Tab. 16.2a). Sl. 5: Histogram za največjo širino distalnega konca (Bd) nadlahtnic jamskih medvedov iz Krapine in Divjih bab I. Viri podatkov: za Krapino - Miracle (2007, tab. 18); za Divje babe I - jambrešic, Turk (2007, tab. 16.2a). For the humerus, a plot of greatest length (GL) versus greatest breadth (Bd) shows a well defined cluster of relatively large humeri and a much smaller outlier (Fig.4). These groups are interpreted as being from males and females, respectively. A histogram of greatest breadth shows a clear bimodal distribution (Fig. 5); humeri with Bd > 115 mm are identified as male and those with Bd < 110 mm as female. The distal breadth of cave bear humeri from Spain (N = 67) is also bimo-dally distributed; Bd > 118 mm are interpreted as male while Bd < 112 mm are interpreted as female (Torres et al. 1991, 22). The similarity of these distributions is quite remarkable. Nine of the 10 Krapina humeri are identified as male; the remaining humerus (#516) comes from a relatively large individual and is probably also from a male. The histogram of ulna greatest length is roughly bimodal, with a smaller mode between 325-335 mm and a larger mode with multiple peaks between 355-400 mm that are interpreted as being from females and males, respectively (Fig. 6). Ulnae with greatest lengths between these distributions are classified as female? (335-340 mm), unknown (340-350 mm), and male? (350-355 mm). Torres et al. (1991, 22, Fig. 5.2 A1-B1) also found bimodality in greatest ulna length (GL) in Spanish cave bears (N = 44), with a smaller mode between 305-335 mm and a larger mode with a peak between 380-410 mm. They attributed ulnae with GL < 365 mm as female and those with GL > 365 mm as male. In three cave bear assemblages from the Eastern Alps, Reisinger and Hohenegger (1998, 105) found clear bimodality in ulna GL, with a break in the distribution at either 360 mm (Conturines cave, Gamssulzen cave) or 350 mm (Herdengel cave). The overall size of Divje babe I and Krapina cave bears appears to be somewhat smaller than those at other sites, with the exception of Herdengel cave. On this basis, seven of the Krapina ulnae are identified as male or male? and one is classified as (tj. 215 mm in 204 mm), sicer najbolj dimorfnega parametra v okviru lobanje jamskega medveda. Pri tem se oba navedena primerka iz Krapine umeščata znotraj variacijske širine za samce iz drugih evropskih najdišč ter s tem očitno presegata vrednosti, ki so bile ugotovljene pri samicah (Grandal-d'Anglade, Lopez-Gonzalez 2005, sl. 4). tudi preostala dva izmerljiva lobanjska odlomka (#267, 271.1) sta najverjetneje pripadala samcema; ne pri enem ne pri drugem sicer niso ohranjeni posebej diagnostični deli, sta pa oba razmeroma velika (Miracle 2007, tab. 14). Znano je, da so pri jamskem medvedu izrazito spolno dimorfne tudi dolge kosti okončin (Grandal-d'Anglade, Lopez-Gonzalez 2005, 326; Reisinger, Hohenegger 1998; torres 1988a; 1988b). dimenzije teh skeletnih elementov pri krapinskih medvedih (Miracle 2007, 67 ss, tab. 18-19) so bile neposredno primerjane z veliko bogatejšim vzorcem iz Divjih bab I; korpus metričnih podatkov z navedenega najdišča je bil namreč detajlno objavljen (Jambrešic, turk 2007), sama razdalja med obema jamama pa ne presega 150 km. V primerjavo je bilo vključenih tudi več vzhodnoalpskih najdišč (Reisinger, Hohenegger 1998) ter bogat vzorec iz Španije (torres et al. 1991). V primeru nadlahtnic je na grafičnem prikazu razmerja med največjo dolžino kosti (GL) in širino njenega distalnega konca (Bd) mogoče prepoznati oblak razmeroma velikih primerkov, od katerega odstopa veliko manjši osamelec (sl. 4). Navedeno dihotomijo gre interpretirati kot odsev spolnega dimorfizma, pri čemer predstavljajo večji primerki ostanek samcev, manjši izolirani osamelec pa samico. Histogram za parameter "največja širina distalnega konca" izkazuje očitno bimodalno porazdelitev (sl. 5); pri tem gre nadlahtnice z Bd nad 115 mm prišteti k medvedom, tiste z Bd pod 110 mm pa medvedkam. Bimodalna porazdelitev obravnavanega parametra je bila ugotovljena tudi v primeru nadlahtnic iz Španije (N = 67), kjer so 7 6 5 3 2 1 Jll 305 310 315 320 325 330 335 340 345 350 355 360 365 370 375 380 385 390 395 400405410 GL(min) Fig. 6: Histogram of greatest length (GL) of cave bear ulnae from Krapina and Divje babe I. Krapina data from Miracle (2007, Tab. 18). Divje babe I data from Jambrešic, Turk (2007, Tab. 16.2b). Sl. 6: Histogram za največjo dolžino (GL) komolčnic jamskih medvedov iz Krapine in Divjih bab I. Viri podatkov: za Kra-pino - Miracle (2007, tab. 18); za Divje babe I - Jambrešic, Turk (2007, tab. 16.2b). d Id 260 2675 275 282.5 290 297.5 305 312.5 320 327.5 335 342.5 350 GL(iimi) Fig. 7: Histogram of greatest length (GL) of cave bear radii from Krapina and Divje babe I. Krapina data from Miracle (2007, Tab. 18). Divje babe I data from Jambrešic, Turk (2007, Tab. 16.2c). Sl. 7: Histogram za največjo dolžino (GL) koželjnic jamskih medvedov iz Krapine in Divjih bab I. Viri podatkov: za Kra-pino - Miracle (2007, tab. 18); za Divje babe I - Jambrešic, Turk (2007, tab. 16.2c). unknown. The remaining three damaged ulnae are not assigned a sex, although two relatively large specimens are probably from males. The histogram of radius greatest length is also bimodal, with modes at 275-282.5 mm and 312.5-320 mm (Fig. 7). Radii with Gl < 290 mm are classified as female, while those with Gl > 297.5 mm are classified as male. Torres et al. (1991, 23, Fig. 5.3) also found bimodality in greatest radius length (Gl) in Spanish cave bears (N = 85), with a smaller mode between 275-290 mm and a larger mode with a peak between 305-320 mm. A similar pattern was found in the Eastern Alps, although the break in distributions was at 310 mm (Reisinger, Hohenegger 1998, 105). These distributions are very similar to those from Divje babe I and Krapina; all of them can be interpreted in terms of sexual dimorphism, although the Divje babe I and Krapina radii appear to be on average somewhat smaller than radii from the other sites. On this basis, seven of the Krapina radii are identified as male. Of the remaining four damaged radii, two large proximal ends are probably from males (Bp > 50 mm), one small proximal end (Bp = 44.6 mm) is probably from a female (Fig. 8), and a small distal end (Bd = 65.2 mm) is also probably from a female. The femora likewise show a strongly bimodal distribution of greatest length, with a break in the distribution between 400-410 mm (Fig. 9). Femur Gl in Iberian cave bears (N = 33) is also strongly bimodal, with breaks in the distribution between 420-440 mm, depending on the population (Torres et al. 1991, 28, Fig. 5.12). The Eastern Alpine cave bear assemblages show a break in the distribution of femur Gl somewhere between 410-450 mm, depending on the population (Reisinger, Hohenegger 1998, 106). These distributions are again very similar to those from Divje babe I and Krapina; in all cases sexual dimorphism is the best explanation of this bimodality. Greatest proximal breadth (Bp) also has a bimodal distribution (Fig. 10), allowing the assignment of sex from fragmentary femora; those with a Bp < 110 mm were classified as female. All of the Krapina femora were classified as male on the basis of both greatest length and proximal breadth. A histogram of tibia Gl is strongly bimodal, and the distribution can be cut between 270 and 280 mm (Fig. 11). A bivariate plot of tibia proximal breath (Bp) against greatest length (Gl) also reveals two distinct groups; one tibia with a Gl of 272 mm (D.b. 880/27) is grouped with the smaller specimens owing to its small proximal breadth (Fig. 12). I interpret tibae with Gl > 275 mm to be from males and those with Gl < 275 mm to be from females. Tibia distal breadth is also strongly bimodal in distribution, with a break between 67.5-70 mm (Fig. 13). A single tibia (D.b. 1178) with Gl in the female range and Db in the male range has been left unsexed. Tibia Gl is also bimodal in Iberian cave bears (Torres et al. 1991, 29), although the break in the distribution varies by assem- 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 Bp (mm) 51 53 55 57 Fig. 8: Histogram of proximal breadth (Bp) of cave bear radii from Krapina and Divje babe I. Krapina data from Miracle (2007, Tab. 18). Divje babe I data from Jambrešič,Turk (2007, Tab. 16.2c). Sl. 8: Histogram za največjo širino proksimalnega konca (Bp) koželjnic jamskih medvedov iz Krapine in Divjih bab I. Viri podatkov: za Krapino - Miracle (2007, tab. 18); za Divje babe I - Jambrešič, Turk (2007, tab. 16.2c). 7 6 5 Z " 3 2 1 360 370 380 390 400 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 500 GL(mm) Fig. 9: Histogram of greatest length (Gl) of cave bear femora from Krapina and Divje babe I. Krapina data from Miracle (2007, Tab. 19). Divje babe I data from Jambrešič, Turk (2007, Tab. 16.2d). Sl. 9: Histogram za največjo dolžino (Bd) stegnenic jamskih medvedov iz Krapine in Divjih bab I. Viri podatkov: za Krapino - Miracle (2007, tab. 19); za Divje babe I - Jambrešič, Turk (2007, tab. 16.2d). 6 n 5 -4 - Z 3 2 -1 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 Bp (mm) Fig. 10: Histogram of proximal breadth (Bp) of cave bear femora from Krapina and Divje babe I. Krapina data from Miracle (2007, Tab. 19). Divje babe I data from Jambrešič, Turk (2007, Tab. 16.2d). Sl. 10: Histogram za največjo širino proksimalnega konca (Bp) stegnenic jamskih medvedov iz Krapine in Divjih bab I. Viri podatkov: za Krapino - Miracle (2007, tab. 19); za Divje babe I - Jambrešič, Turk (2007, tab. 16.2d). I S ; C? 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 GL (mm) Fig. 11: Histogram of greatest length (GL) of cave bear tibiae from Krapina and Divje babe 1. Krapina data from Miracle (2007, Tab. 19), Divje babe I data from Jambrešic, Turk (2007, Tab. 16.2e). Sl. 11: Histogram za največjo dolžino (GL) golenic jamskih medvedov iz Krapine in Divjih bab I. Viri podatkov: za Krapino - Miracle (2007, tab. 19); za Divje babe I - Jambrešic, Turk (2007, tab. 16.2e). ♦ 120- ♦ 115 - 110 - J ♦ . ♦♦ ♦ » 105100- _ 95 - _____ m 90- , 85- ' 8075-* : 70- < 65 T-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-r 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 GL (mm) Fig. 12: Crossplot of greatest proximal breadth (Bp) against greatest length (GL) of cave bear tibiae from Krapina and Divje babe I. Krapina data from Miracle (2007, Tab. 19). Divje babe I data from Jambrešic, Turk (2007, Tab. 16.2e). Sl. 12: Grafični prikaz razmerja med največjo širino proksimalnega konca (Bp) in največjo dolžino (GL) golenic jamskih medvedov iz Krapine in Divjih bab I. Viri podatkov: za Krapino - Miracle (2007, tab. 19); za Divje babe I - Jambrešic, Turk (2007, Tab. 16.2e). D.b.* j 880/27/ > Krapina Divje babe I 52.5 55 575 60 62.5 65 67.5 70 72.5 75 77.5 80 82.5 85 87.5 90 92.5 Bd (mm) Fig. 13: Histogram of greatest distal breadth (Bd) of cave bear tibiae from Krapina and Divje babe I. Krapina data from Miracle (2007, Tab. 19). Divje babe I data from Jambrešic, Turk (2007, Tab. 16.2e). Sl. 13: Histogram za največjo širino distalnega konca (Bd) golenic jamskih medvedov iz Krapine in Divjih bab I. Viri podatkov: za Krapino - Miracle (2007, tab. 19); za Divje babe I - Jambrešic, Turk (2007, tab. 16.2e). bili kot ostanki samcev prepoznani primerki z Bd nad 118 mm, kot ostanki samic pa tisti z Bd pod 112 mm (torres et al. 1991, 22). Podobnost obeh porazdelitev je vsekakor zanimiva. Sicer pa je bilo od skupno desetih nadlahtnic iz Krapine devet primerkov z gotovostjo pripisanih samcem, enako pa najbrž velja tudi za desetega (#516), ki je prav tako pripadal razmeroma veliki živali. v grobem je bimodalna tudi porazdelitev izmerjenih vrednosti za največjo dolžino komolčnice, z manj izrazitim modusom med 325 in 335 mm ter tistim izrazitejšim z več vrhovi pri vrednostih med 355 in 400 mm (sl. 6). Podobno kot zgoraj je tudi tu bimodalnost interpretirana kot odraz razlik med spoloma. Pri tem so bile komolčnice, katerih največja dolžina se umešča med obe zgornji mo-dalni vrednosti, vključene v eno od naslednjih kategorij: "samica?" (335-340 mm), "spol ni znan" (340-350 mm) ter "samec?" (350-355 mm). Bimodalno so bili porazdeljeni tudi podatki o največji dolžini (GL) komolčnic jamskih medvedov iz Španije (torres et al. 1991, 22, sl. 5.2 A1-B1), z modusoma med 305 in 335 mm ter med 380 in 410 mm. Na podlagi navedenega so bili kot ostanki medvedov prepoznani primerki z GL nad 365 mm, ostanki medvedk pa tisti z GL pod 365 mm. Podobno sliko sta pri treh vzhodnoalpskih vzorcih odkrila tudi Reisinger in Hohenegger (1998, 105), s prekinitvijo zveznosti pri vrednostih 360 mm (jami Conturines in Gamssulzen) oz. 350 mm (jama Herdengel). Velikost jamskih medvedov iz Divjih bab I in Krapine je najbrž nekoliko zaostajala za velikostjo živali iz zgoraj navedenih najdišč, z izjemo jame Herdengel. Posledično je bilo sedem komolčnic iz Krapine vključenih v skupino "samec" oz. "samec?", eden pa v skupino "spol ni znan". Preostali trije primerki niso omogočali zanesljivega razlikovanja med spoloma, čeprav bi dva od njih spričo njune velikosti najbrž vendarle lahko pripisali samcem. Bimo dalno porazdelitev kaže tudi histogram za naj -večjo dolžino koželjnic, z modusoma pri 275-282,5 mm ter 312,5-320 mm (sl. 7). Primerki daljši od 290 mm naj bi tako pripadali samicam, tisti daljši od 297,5 mm pa samcem. v prav tako bimodalno porazdeljenih me-tričnih podatkih za španske živali (N = 85; torres et al. 1991, 23, sl. 5.3) sta bili modalni vrednosti prepoznani pri 275-290 mm oz. 305-320 mm. Podoben vzorec je bil ugotovljen tudi pri vzhodnoalpskih primerkih živali, le da je bila pri teh prekinitev v zveznosti opazna pri GL = 310 mm (Reisinger, Hohenegger 1998, 105). Kar zadeva porazdelitev podatkov o največji dolžini koželjnic jamskih medvedov iz Krapine oz. Divjih bab I, je ta prav tako bimodalna in torej - tako kot v zgornjih primerih - odseva spolni dimorfizem. Razlika med Krapino in Divjimi babami I na eni strani ter vzhodnoalpskim in španskim vzorcem na drugi je torej zgolj v tem, da so koželjnice iz prvih dveh najdišč nekoliko manjše. tako naj bi sedem od skupno enajstih krapinskih primerkov koželjnice zagotovo pripadalo samcem, dva poškodovana z največjo širino proksimalnega konca nad 50 mm pa blage from as low as 260-270 mm (N = 18, Troskaeta) to 280-290 mm (N = 40, Iberian sample). The complete Krapina tibiae (N = 5) are clearly from males. The remaining three specimens have greatest proximal or distal breadths sufficiently large to also classify them as males. CAVE BEAR SEX RATIO: DISCUSSION While it is difficult to be certain of the sexing of a given specimen based on measurements alone, I think that these data give a fair representation of the overall composition of the cave bear sample from Krapina. The assemblage is overwhelmingly dominated by males; the frequency of long-bones sexed as male ranges from 63.6-100% (Tab. 2). The male bias is not limited to the canine teeth, and one cannot explain this sex ratio by a preferential collection/curation of larger (male) canine teeth (Miracle 2007, 61). Furthermore, although there was a curation bias for cave bear remains from Krapina, it would appear to have most severely affected axial elements and the limb extremities relative to other parts of the skeleton (Miracle 2007, 32). How can one interpret the extremely skewed sex ratio at Krapina? The frequency of male cave bears at Krapina exceeds the maximum of 67% males based on canine breadth from 12 Pleistocene sites in Europe (Kurtén 1958, 45-46, Tab. 14) as well as the frequency of males inferred from long-bone dimensions from Herdengel cave and Divje babe I facies A (Tab. 3). Kurtén (1958, 5) suggested that two instances of highly skewed sex ratios (% Males of 90% and 22.7%) were explainable by curatorial decisions that led to a collection bias for larger (mostly male) specimens; in the former case the museum was able to retain the "finest specimens", while in the latter case the best, mostly male, pieces went to private collectors. The Krapina cave bear assemblage has been selectively culled since the time of excavation, and the strongly male-biased sex ratio seems easily explainable in terms of a collection bias for the "finest specimens" . If one considers Krapina within the context of other assemblages from the region, however, it becomes apparent that a strongly male-biased sex ratio may reflect more than just a collection bias. I return to the analysis of the Divje babe I long-bones. The same graphs, distributions, and observations that were used to sex the Krapina remains can also be used to sex the Divje babe I cave bear long-bones. The results are presented in table 4. Jambrešic and Turk (2007, 383 f) concluded from their detailed metric analyses of the tibae from Divje babe I that "in both facies A and B, there are a higher number of longer and more robust specimens, which is interpreted as a predominance of males." In facies A the frequency of males ranges from 81.5% (tibia) to 100% (humerus); the overall frequency of males is 87.2% (Tab. 5). In Tab. 2: frequency of cave bear remains from krapina sexed as female (f), male (M) or indeterminate (?). The "% Male" is calculated as M/(f+M+?)*100 %. Tab. 2: Število ostankov krapinskih jamskih medvedov, ki so bili pripisani samicam (f), samcem (M) oz. jim spola ni bilo mogoče določiti (?). Podatek "% samcev" je bil izračunan kot M/(f+M+?)*100 %. Element ? F M % Male / % samcev Crania 2 1 7 70.0 C 2 15 88.2 C1 1 2 12 80.0 Humerus 1 0 9 90.0 ulna 4 0 7 63.6 Radius 2 9 81.8 Femur 0 9 100.0 Tibia 0 8 100.0 Total / skupaj 8 7 76 83.5 Tab. 3: Frequency of male cave bears from sites in the eastern Alps based on long-bone dimensions (Conturines Cave, Gamssulzen Cave, Herdengel Cave, data from Reisinger and Hohenegger 1998, 107, 113) and metacarpal dimensions (Divje babe I, data from Toškan 2007b, Tab. 17.1). Tab. 3: Število samcem pripisanih ostankov jamskih medvedov v gradivu iz vzhodnoalpskih najdišč (jame Conturines, Gamssulzen in Herdengel; vir podatkov: Reisinger, Hohenegger 1998, 107, 113) ter iz Divjih bab I (Toškan 2007b, tab. 17.1). V slednjem primeru je bil spol določen na osnovi dimenzij dlančnic, pri vzhodnoalpskih najdbah pa glede na velikost dolgih kosti. Site (cave) / najdišče (jama) F M Total / skupaj % Male / % samcev Conturines 71 21 92 22.8 Gamssulzen 33 14 47 29.8 Herdengel 34 65 99 65.7 Divje babe I, facies A 76 146 222 65.8 Divje babe I, facies C 95 76 171 44.4 pogojno; samice naj bi bile zastopane s po enim primerkom proksimalnega konca koželjnice (Bp = 44,6 mm) in enim distalnega (Bd = 65,2 mm; sl. 8). Pri stegnenicah je bila prekinitev v zveznosti bimodalne porazdelitve podatkov o največji dolžini navedenega skeletnega elementa ugotovljena pri vrednostih med 400 in 410 mm (sl. 9). Podobno sliko kažejo tudi španski jamski medvedi, pri katerih pa prekinitev v zveznosti porazdelitve niha med vrednostma 420 in 440 mm, pač odvisno od populacije (torres et al. 1991, 28, sl. 5.12). Pri gradivu z vzhodnoalpskih najdišč so bile medpopulacijske razlike v tem pogledu še za odtenek izrazitejše (prekinitev med 410-450 mm; Reisinger, Hohenegger 1998, 106), v vseh primerih pa gre facies B the results for the different long-bones are again consistent (% Male ranges from 67.6-84.6%) and the overall frequency of males is 73.1%. Finally, in facies C the reverse pattern is true - males make up only 34.6% of the assemblage. Analysis of sexual dimorphism in cave bear long-bones shows that the bias either for or against males is more pronounced than that observed in the metapodials, although the pattern of stratigraphic change is similar (Toškan 2007b). Separate taphonomic analyses of male and female cave bear remains from Divje babe I would be profitable. Toškan (2007b, 399 f) has Tab. 4: Sex determination of cave bear long-bones from Divje babe I. Inventory numbers from JambrešiC and Turk (2007, Tabs. 16.2a-e). AH specimens from JambrešiC and Turk (2007, Tabs. 16.2a-e) that are not listed here are "male" . Tab. 4: Razvrstitev dolgih kosti jamskih medvedov iz Divjih bab I med oba spola. Inventurne številke so bile povzete po JambrešiC, Turk (2007, tab. 16.2a-e). Vsi primerki, ki jih navajata JambrešiC, Turk (2007, tab. 16.2a-e) in na tem mestu niso navedeni, so bili pripisani samcem. Element Sex ? / spol ? Female / samica Humerus 29, 2189, 2409, 2411, 2414 ulna 343, 387, 1695, 2196, 2201, 2285, 2370, 2372 Radius 1362, 2293 161, 166, 201, 215, 391, 506, 533, 550, 551, 1625, 1804, 1806, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1956, 2292, 2294, 2394, 2396, 2405 Femur 2351, 2352 200, 381, 620, 2239, 2355, 2357, 2416 Tibia 1178, 2258 159, 382, 383, 880, 1179, 1284, 1626, 1645, 1694, 2253, 2260, 2384, 2385 bimodalnost razumeti kot odsev spolnega dimorfizma. Slednje seveda velja tudi za vzorca iz Krapine in Divjih bab I. Bimodalno porazdelitev kažejo tudi vrednosti največje širine proksimalnega konca (Bp; sl. 10), zaradi česar je prepoznavanje spola mogoče tudi pri odlomkih stegnenic (primerki z Bp nad 110 mm naj bi pripadali samcem). Na podlagi navedenih dveh kriterijev (tj. GL in Bp) so bile vse stegnenice krapinskih jamskih medvedov pripisane močnejšemu od obeh spolov. Histogram za največjo dolžino golenice je močno bimodalen, s porazdelitvijo, ki se deli na dva dela pri vrednostih med 270 in 280 mm (sl. 11). Dve ločeni skupini sta prepoznavni tudi na grafičnem prikazu razmerja med širino proksimalnega konca (Bp) in največjo dolžino kosti (GL); primerek z GL = 272 (D.b. 880/27) se k manjšim golenicam umešča zaradi ozkega proksimalnega konca (sl. 12). Pri gradivu iz Krapine so bile k samcem pripisane golenice z GL nad 275 mm, k samicam pa tiste z GL 275 mm oz. manjšim od 275 mm. Izrazito bimodalna je tudi porazdelitev podatkov o globini distalnega konca, s prekinitvijo v zveznosti porazdelitve pri vrednostih med 67,5 in 70 mm (sl. 13). Primerek iz Divjih bab I (D.b. 1178), ki se je po največji dolžini umeščal k medvedkam, po globini dis-talnega konca pa k medvedom, ni bil dokončno pripisan k nobenemu od obeh spolov. Bimodalna porazdelitev podatkov o največji dolžini golenic je bila ugotovljena tudi pri španskih jamskih medvedih (Torres et al. 1991, 29), pri katerih prekinitev v zveznosti distribucije niha med 260-270 mm (N = 18; Troskaeta) in 280-290 mm (N = 40; iberski vzorec). Vseh pet v celoti ohranjenih golenic iz Krapine je bilo brez sence dvoma pripisanih samcem, na podlagi širine proksimalnih oz. distalnih koncev golenice pa najbrž enako lahko umestimo tudi vse tri zgolj delno ohranjene golenične primerke. Tab. 5: Sex ratio of cave bear long-bones from Divje babe I by facies. The "% Male" is calculated as M/(F+M+?)*100 %. Bones listed under notes are not included in facies totals. Tab. 5: Razmerje med spoloma pri dolgih kosteh jamskih medvedov iz Divjih bab I po faciesih. Podatek "% samcev" je bil izračunan kot M/(F+M+?)*100 %. Kosti, ki so podane v opombah, niso bile vključene v izračun skupnega števila najdb za posamezno facies. RAZMERJE MED SPOLOMA PRI JAMSKEM MEDVEDU: RAZPRAVA Prepoznavanje spola pri vsaki posamezni kosti oz. zobu zgolj na podlagi metričnih podatkov je sicer težavno in pogosto ne povsem zanesljivo, v primeru zgoraj predstavljenih rezultatov analize krapinskih Element Facies A Facies B Facies C Notes / opombe Sex ? / spol ? F M % Male / % samcev Sex ? / spol ? F M % Male / % samcev Sex ? / spol ? F M % Male / % samcev Humerus 0 6 100.0 3 7 70.0 1 1 50.0 1 F (B/C) ulna 1 20 95.2 4 12 75.0 1 1 50.0 2 F (B/C) Radius 1 3 21 84.0 1 10 23 67.6 7 2 22.2 1 F, 1 M (B/C) Femur 1 6 85.7 2 11 84.6 2 4 1 14.3 Tibia 1 4 22 81.5 1 7 23 74.2 2 4 66.7 1 M (A/B), 4 M (B/C) Total 2 9 75 87.2 2 26 76 73.1 2 15 9 34.6 already commented on the "lack" of adult male cave bear canines relative to metapodials in the MIS 3 assemblages, suggesting that these canines were selectively taken away from the site by palaeolithic people. Such an analysis is for another time and place. Here I simply note that the male cave bear bias is even stronger at Divje babe I facies A than at Krapina, and that this skewed sex ratio cannot be explained away as a collection bias at the time of excavation or curation. The sex composition may also vary with the age at death of the cave bears. Males and females are roughly equally represented among older juvenile, sub-adult, and younger adult cave bears at Potočka zijalka; among older adults, males make up 83.3% of the age class (canines: N = 54; Debeljak 2004, 179). A similar pattern of changing sex composition by age is also present at Mokriška jama, although old adult males make up only 73% of the age class (canines: N = 293; Debeljak 2004, 178). This pattern is very similar to that found at Krapina. Remains of juvenile cave bears are rare at Krapina; the age structure shows a predominance of prime-aged adults (Miracle 2007, Fig. 304). Of the 36 canine teeth, 29 of them (80.6%) show moderate to heavy wear and only two of them (5.5%) are tooth buds. The adult and old-adult cohorts are dominated by males; there are too few juvenile and sub-adult remains to examine the sex structure in those cohorts. Looking further afield, the frequency of males reaches as high as 88.6% for particular skeletal elements at Herdengel Cave (tibia: N = 35; Reisinger, Hohenegger 1998, 113), and at Grotta Lattaia the frequency of males is 87.5% for skull (N = 8) and 81.5% for skull and long-bones combined (N = 27, calculated using skull, humerus, ulna, radius, femur, and tibia from Argenti, Mazza 2006, Tab. 1). Although the sample from Grotta Lattaia is inadequate for a detailed analysis of cave bear sex ratios (Argenti, Mazza 2006, 1555), the strong male bias is striking, particularly on the large sample of skulls plus long-bones. I conclude from this brief survey of other cave bear assemblages that a strongly biased male sex ratio can be created by processes other than excava-tion/curation bias. Although much remains unknown and problematic about the excavation methods and curation history of Krapina, I think that the skewed cave bear sex ratio at Krapina reflects more than just a curatorial bias. SIZE OF THE KRAPINA CAVE BEARS As discussed above, dating of the Krapina assemblage is not straightforward. Although ESR dates and detailed revision of the fauna suggest that much of the assemblage was deposited under interglacial (MIS 5) or even full interglacial (MIS 5e) conditions (Rink et al. 1995; Miracle 2007), there has been debate over how late jamskih medvedov pa se o njihovi zanesljivosti vendarle ne zdi potrebno dvomiti. Na očitno prevlado samcev v gradivu iz navedenega najdišča so namreč pokazale tako analize posameznih dolgih kosti okončin (delež samcev niha med 63,3 odstotka in 100 odstotki; tab. 2) kot tudi podočniki. Prav zaradi navedenega ugotovljene slike nikakor ne gre pripisati preferenci izkopavalcev in/ali kustosov do (večjih) podočnikov samcev (Miracle 2007, 61). toliko bolj zato, ker naj bi selektivni pristop k oblikovanju in urejanju zbirke prizadel predvsem osni skelet in kosti okončin (Miracle 2007, 32). Na točki, ko so rezultati analize spolne strukture krapinskih jamskih medvedov nedvoumno pokazali na očitno prevlado medvedov nad medvedkami, se velja v nadaljevanju posvetiti interpretaciji navedene slike. Dejstvo je, da relativna frekvenca pojavljanja samcev v Krapini presega najvišji, na podlagi širine podočnikov ugotovljeni delež živali navedenega spola med vzorci iz dvanajstih pleistocenskih najdišč v Evropi (Kurten 1958, 45 s, tab. 14). Obenem podatek za Krapino presega tudi deleža, ki sta bila na podlagi dimenzij dolgih kosti ugotovljena ob analizi najdb z najdišč Herdengel in Divje babe I - facies A (tab. 3). Ko se je z vzorcema z izrazito visoko (tj. 90%; jama Hohlestein) oz. nizko (tj. 22,7%; jama Sibyllen) prevlado samcev srečal Kurten (1958, 5), je nesimetrično zastopanost obeh spolov pripisal kusto-sovi preferenci do večjih primerkov (ki so torej povečini pripadali samcem); pri tem naj bi imel v primeru jame Hohlestein "najatraktivnejše" najdbe pravico zadržati muzej, pri najdišču Sibyllenhöhle pa so te pripadle zasebnim zbirateljem. Ker je bila selektivno oblikovana tudi zbirka ostankov jamskih medvedov iz Krapine, bi nemara podoben argument načeloma veljalo uporabiti tudi v tem primeru. A pozor! Če na Krapino pogledamo v kontekstu drugih najdišč z ostanki jamskega medveda v regiji, se premočrtno povezovanje močno prevladujočega deleža samcev s pristranskostjo kustosa ne zdi več dovolj prepričljivo. vrnimo se tako za hip k analizi dolgih kosti iz Divjih bab I. Enake grafične prikaze, porazdelitve in zapažanja, kot so bili uporabljeni pri spolnem razvrščanju v primeru Krapine, lahko uporabimo tudi za dolge kosti okončin iz Divjih bab I (tab. 4). Kot sta iz rezultatov detajlne metrične analize golenic iz navedenega najdišča sklepala Jambrešič in turk (2007, 383 s), prevladujejo v faciesih A in B daljši in robu-stnejši primerki, ki so bili kot taki pripisani samcem. v okviru faciesa A je delež dolgih kosti močnejšega spola nihal med 81,5 odstotka (golenice) in 100 odstotki (nadlahtnica), s povprečno vrednostjo pri 87,2 odstotka (tab. 5). Medsebojno primerljivi so tudi podatki o relativni frekvenci pojavljanja vsakega od obeh spolov pri posameznih dolgih kosteh iz faciesa B, čeprav je tu premoč samcev za odtenek manj izrazita (delež slednjih niha med 67,6 in 84,6 %; povprečje: 73,1 %). in time the Krapina sequence extends. Malez (1970b; Malez 1978; Malez, M. & V. 1989) suggested that the uppermost layers were deposited in the Würm II stadial (MIS 3), while Herak (1947) and Patou-Mathis (1997) suggested that these layers were deposited during the early Würm glacial (MIS 4). While the faunal assemblages indicate a shift from full interglacial to somewhat cooler conditions within the sequence, I have argued that the entire assemblage falls within MIS 5 (Miracle 2007, 216). The portion of the assemblage that is primarily in question is that from the top of the sequence, layer 9, from which the majority of the cave bear remains probably derive (Miracle 2007, 32, 211). The size of the cave bears from Krapina may thus also be indicative of the age of layer 9. If these remains were deposited during the early Würm glacial, then they should be as large as, or even larger than cave bears from the region that lived under glacial conditions (MIS 3-4). If they were deposited under interglacial conditions (MIS 5), then they should be smaller than those that lived under glacial conditions. There are several sites with large vertebrate assemblages in the immediate region of the Croatian Zagorje that could provide suitable comparisons to interglacial and glacial cave bears (Malez 1963; 1986; Paunovic 1988; Miracle 1991; Miracle et al. 2010). Unfortunately, none of the cave bear assemblages have been published in sufficient detail to infer sex ratios and compare body size. The closest assemblages with adequate cave bear assemblages that have been published in detail are Divje babe I (Turk 2007), Mokriška jama (Debeljak 2007), and Potočka zijalka (Pacher et al. 2004). I focus on Divje babe I owing to its long sequence and large cave bear assemblage. The Divje babe I assemblage is an excellent comper-andum to Krapina because it can be divided into discrete facies of different ages. At the bottom of the sequence are layers 13-23, facies C, that were deposited under relatively warmer conditions and date to ca. 116-80 ka (MIS 5a-d; Blackwell et al. 2007, 154). After an apparent gap in the sequence that corresponds to the full glacial conditions of MIS 4, there is a series of layers (2-12) grouped into facies A and B, that were deposited under relatively colder conditions from ca. 70-38 ka (MIS 3; Blackwell et al. 2007, 155). If the Krapina cave bear remains were deposited under full interglacial conditions (MIS 5e), then they should be smaller than the Divje babe I facies C assemblage deposited under cooler interglacial conditions (MIS 5a-d). On the other hand, if they were deposited during the cooler part of MIS 5a-d, then they should be the same size as Divje babe I facies C, although they might still be smaller than the glacial assemblages from Divje babe I facies A and B. Finally, if the Krapina cave bears lived under glacial conditions, then they should be similar in body size to the Divje babe I facies A and B cave bear assemblages. These hypotheses are predicated on the assumption that the Povsem drugačno sliko pa kaže gradivo iz faciesa C, kjer s 65,4 odstotka prevladujejo ostanki medvedk. Razlika med deležema samcev in samic pri najdbah iz posameznega faciesa je sicer pri metapodjih nekoliko manj izrazita kot pri dolgih kosteh, sam vzorec spolne strukture z zgoraj omenjenim obratom na prehodu iz faciesa C v B pa ostaja podoben (Toškan 2007b). V zvezi s tem bi se zdelo koristno opraviti ločeni tafonomski analizi ostankov samcev in samic. Toškan (2007b, 399 s) je tako v okviru gradiva iz MIS 3 ugotovil primanjkljaj podočnikov odraslih samcev glede na stanje pri metapodijih ter to komentiral kot domnevno posledico njihovega selektivnega pobiranja s strani paleolitskih ljudi. Preslikava tovrstnih razmišljanj na primer Krapine je seveda v tem trenutku neumestna - ne nazadnje je tu govor o prostorsko in časovno povsem različnih kontekstih. Je pa na tem mestu vsekakor vredno omeniti, da je prevlada ostankov samcev v gradivu iz Krapine še očitnejša, kot je bilo to ugotovljeno pri obeh mlajših faciesih v Divjih babah I, ter da takšne slike preprosto ni mogoče zadovoljivo razložiti zgolj z argumentom o pristranskosti izkopavalcev oz. kustosov zbirke. Spolna struktura se lahko spreminja tudi v odvisnosti od starosti ob poginu. Če namreč med starejšimi mladiči, subadultnimi živalmi in mladimi odraslimi medvedi iz Potočke zijalke opaznejših razlik v deležu zastopanosti obeh spolov ni bilo, pa predstavljajo v razredu starejših odraslih primerkov samci kar 83,3 odstotka vseh najdb (N = 54 podočnikov; Debeljak 2004, 179). Podoben vzorec spreminjanja spolne strukture populacije s starostjo je bil ugotovljen tudi v primeru Mokriške jame, čeprav tu delež samcev med starejšimi odraslimi medvedi ne presega 73 odstotkov (N = 293 podočnikov; Debeljak 2004, 178). V okviru krapinskega vzorca, ki v osnovi prav tako izkazuje podobno sliko, je ostankov mladih jamskih medvedov malo; rezultati analize starostne strukture so namreč izpostavili prevlado ostankov mladih odraslih živali (Miracle 2007, sl. 304). Od 36 podočnikov jih tako kar 29 (tj. 80,6 %) kaže zmerno do močno obrabo, medtem ko je bilo število najdenih zasnov zob zgolj dve (tj. 5,5 %). Če torej spolne strukture mladih in subadultnih živali ni mogoče oceniti, pa med odraslimi in starimi odraslimi tudi tu očitno prevladujejo prav samci. Poglejmo sedaj še nekoliko dlje. V okviru gradiva iz jame Herdengel je bil delež samcev med ostanki golenic kar 88,6-odstoten (N = 35, Reisinger, Hohenegger 1998, 113), v primeru najdišča Grotta lattaia je znašal podobno visokih 87,5 odstotka (ob upoštevanju zgolj lobanj; N = 8) oz. 81,5 odstotka (ob upoštevanju lobanj in dolgih kosti, tj. nadlahtnic, komolčnic, koželjnic, stegnenic in golenic; N = 27; Argenti, Mazza 2006, tab. 1). Čeprav drugi od obeh navedenih vzorcev sam po sebi ni primeren za detajlno analizo spolne strukture jamskih medvedov (Argenti, Mazza 2006; 1555), ostaja ugotovljena izrazita prevlada samcev vendarle pozornost body was primarily determined by ambient temperature and regional climatic conditions; one knows, of course, that body size is influenced by a wide range of factors in addition to ambient temperature (Damuth, MacFadden 1990). Pleistocene cave bear populations in the Croatian Zagorje might be larger or smaller than those in central Slovenia owing to other factors such as food availability, intra-specific competition, inter-specific competition, and so forth. Nonetheless, this simple comparison between Krapina and Divje babe I is a useful starting point for further analyses and research on this topic. The Krapina male cave bears are much smaller in canine breadth than are the remains identified as male cave bears from Mokriška jama, Potočka zijalka, and Divje babe I (Tab. 1). Mokriška jama is dated on the basis of associated "Aurignacian" artefacts to the "middle Wurmian period (OIS 3)", and the size difference in canine breadth is highly statistically significant (Mann-Whitney U = 286, Z = -5.72, p < 0.001).2 There is not enough information about the distribution of the Divje babe I canines to compare them statistically to the Krapina remains. There is, however, more detailed information about the small sample of upper canines associated with male cave bear skulls from interpleniglacial (OIS 3) deposits from Divje babe I (Toškan 2007a, 358, Tab. 15.1). The mean breadth of these upper canines from Divje babe I is 22.3 mm (N = 6, s.d. = 2.68), while that for upper canines from Krapina is 19.0 mm (N= 6, s.d. = 0.82). A two-tailed Mann-Whitney test shows this difference to be significant at the 1% level (U = 2, 1% critical value = 2). How does the size of cave bear long-bones from Krapina compare to assemblages from Divje babe I and other sites in the wider region? Given the strongly biased sex ratio from Krapina, it would be inappropriate to compare these assemblages without taking sexual dimorphism into account. Simple summary statistics show that long-bones sexed as "male" from Krapina are indeed larger than long-bones sexed as "female" from Divje babe I and from sites in the eastern Alps (Tab. 6). The lack of females cave bears at Krapina prevents a comparison of their long-bone lengths. Male cave bears from Krapina, however, have on average shorter long-bones than males from Divje babe I, with the exception of the tibia (Tab. 6). On the other hand, the Divje babe I male 2 The frequency of canines of different breadths from Mokriška jama was read off from the published histogram (Debeljak 2007, Fig. 2), and canines were identified as "male" or "female" using Debeljak's criteria. To calculate the U statistic, all canines from a single size division were assumed to have the size of the midpoint of the division - e.g. 6 canines from the size range "14.0-14.5" were all treated as having a breadth of 14.25 mm. While this procedure has slightly reduced the variance of the Mokriška jama sample, it does not affect the overall results. Tab. 6: Cave bear long-bone lengths from Krapina compared to Divje babe I (remains sexed in Tab. 4, calculated from data in jambrešic, Turk 2007) and sites in the eastern Alps (data from Reisinger, Hohenegger 1998). Tab. 6: Primerjava dolžine dolgih kosti jamskih medvedov iz Krapine s tistimi iz Divjih bab I (spol posameznih primerkov podan v tab. 4; izračunano na osnovi podatkov v jambrešic, Turk 2007) oz. z vzhodnoalpskih najdišč (vir podatkov: Reisinger, Hohenegger 1998). zbujajoča - sploh v primeru razmeroma velikega vzorca lobanj in dolgih kosti. Navedeno tako le še dodatno podkrepljuje tezo o tem, da do močno nesorazmerne zastopanosti obeh spolov v zbirkah ostankov jamskega medveda iz posameznih najdišč lahko pride tudi povsem neodvisno od morebitnih izkopavalčevih oz. kustosovih preferenc do določene skupine najdb. VELIKOST KRAPINSKIH JAMSKIH MEDVEDOV Časovna umestitev krapinskih jamskih medvedov je, kot je bilo zgoraj že omenjeno, do neke mere nejasna. Čeprav ESR-datacije in detajlna revizija vseh živalskih ostankov kažejo na to, da se je pretežni del tukaj obravnavanega gradiva odložil v interglacialnih (MIS 5) ali celo visokointerglacialnih (MIS 5e) razmerah (Rink et al. 1995; Miracle 2007), pa natančen časovni razpon vendarle še ni znan. Malez (1970b; 1978; Malez, M. in V. 1989) je tako predlagal, da so se najvišje plasti odložile v stadialu würm II (MIS 3), medtem ko naj bi po Heraku (1947) in Patou-Mathisovi (1997) te nastale nekoliko prej, tj. v zgodnjewürmskem glacialu (MIS 4). Čeprav favnistična sestava gradiva iz Krapine v okviru preučevanega profila sicer kaže na določen premik od visokoin-terglacialnih klimatskih razmer k nekoliko hladnejšim, sam celoten vzorec postavljam v MIS 5 (Miracle 2007, 216). Najbolj problematično je v tem smislu gradivo iz najvišje plasti (tj. plasti 9), od koder najbrž izvira tudi večina medvedjih najdb (Miracle 2007, 32, 211). Pri raz-jasnjevanju kronostratigrafskega vprašanja bi tako lahko bili koristni tudi podatki o velikosti krapinskh jamskih medvedov. Če je namreč čas nastanka plasti 9 dejansko mogoče postaviti v zgodnji würm, potem bi morali biti v njej zajeti medvedji ostanki po svoji velikosti najmanj primerljivi s tistimi iz glacialnih (MIS 3-4) kontekstov drugih najdišč v regiji. Če ni bilo tako in je torej plast 9 v resnici nastajala v interglacialnih razmerah (MIS 5), pa bi za krapinske jamske medvede pričakovali, da bodo po velikosti zaostajali za tistimi, ki so ta prostor naseljevali v kasnejšem glacialu. Na območju Hrvaškega Zagorja leži kar nekaj najdišč z bogatim gradivom velikih sesalcev pleistocenske Ji IS (U C ls > M z M z '■o