<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-ZE8P3KSB/85fe96df-d828-4b67-a78b-d26405d973ca/PDF"><dcterms:extent>2157 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-ZE8P3KSB/ca5bc27e-182a-4c3f-902c-ad13ffdea9be/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>62 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1965-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1965</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-ZE8P3KSB"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ETPSIC7M" /><dcterms:issued>2016</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Malnar, Brina</dc:creator><dc:creator>Šinko, Milan</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:53</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:posebna</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 42-63, 251</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0040-3598</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:34360413</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-ZE8P3KSB</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Visoka šola za politične vede</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Teorija in praksa</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Družboslovne ankete</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Evropska družboslovna raziskava</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Javno mnenje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Odprto objavljanje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Open access publishing</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Public opinion</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Social survey</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Uporabniki</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Users</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1965-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Potencial akademske in javnopolitične izrabe družboslovnih podatkov v Sloveniji| primer Evropske družboslovne raziskave|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The article reviews the possibilities and tools for systematic academic and policy utilisation of the European Social Survey findings (ESS) in an international and Slovenian context. The first part discusses the relevance of evidence-based policy and compares several analytical methods for summarising and synthesising the results from a large number of studies for non-academic end-users. Based on bibliographical data, the second part outlines the patterns of ESS academic use across countries, academic disciplines, topics and policy areas in the 2003-2014 period. It proceeds to examine the possibilities of a comparative review of the ESS findings from the perspective of a Slovenian analyst and concludes that the survey offers broad possibilities to evaluate policy orientations, goals and partly measures, particularly in the areas of welfare, economic, immigration and family policies. The article ends with a discussion of access to scientific publications, which continues to present a serious obstacle to non-academic users</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Članek analizira možnosti in mehanizme sistematične akademske in javnopolitične izrabe rezultatov Evropske družboslovne raziskave (ESS) v mednarodnem in slovenskem prostoru. V prvem delu izpostavi pomen z dokazi podprtega oblikovanja politik ter primerja različne metode zbiranja in sinteze velikega števila raziskovalnih izsledkov za potrebe neakademskih uporabnikov. V drugem delu na podlagi bibliografskih podatkov predstavi vzorce dosedanje izrabe podatkov ESS po državah, akademskih disciplinah ter tematskih in javnopolitičnih področjih v obdobju 2003-2014. Nato analizira, kje je z vidika slovenskih analitikov največji potencial pregledne izrabe rezultatov ESS, in ugotavlja, da raziskava ponuja široke možnosti za evaluacijo javnopolitičnih usmeritev, ciljev in deloma ukrepov predvsem na področju blaginjske, ekonomske, priseljenske in družinske politike. Na koncu se dotakne problematike dostopa do znanstvenih publikacij, ki za zdaj predstavlja veliko oviro neakademskim uporabnikom, ko gre za pregledne študije</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-ZE8P3KSB"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-ZE8P3KSB" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-ZE8P3KSB/85fe96df-d828-4b67-a78b-d26405d973ca/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-ZE8P3KSB/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-ZE8P3KSB" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>