{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-YPMRFYL6/73e37666-25b4-4f01-b282-887cdd97875d/PDF","dcterms:extent":"323 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-YPMRFYL6/421bc489-7999-4c9d-862b-0c55b0a7463a/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"42 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2013-2017","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2013"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2017"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-YPMRFYL6","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/urn:NBN:SI:spr-AX7YLI7J"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Mednarodna revija za javno upravo"}],"dcterms:issued":"2014","dc:creator":"Kovač, Polonca","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:12"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:2/3"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 31-45"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:2335-3414","COBISSID:4363950","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-YPMRFYL6"],"dc:language":"en","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Fakulteta za upravo"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"administrative procedure"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"appeal"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"comparative analysis"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"pravica do obveščenosti"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"preglednost"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"primerjalna analiza"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"pritožba"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"procedural law"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"procesno pravo"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"right to information"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"transparency"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"upravni postopek"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2013-2017"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Significance of and comparative trends in procedural regulation of right to information|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Any legal right is (more) efficiently pursued if sufficient procedural regulation supports its substantive setting. This article is dedicated to an analysis of procedural regulation of right to information (RTI) since its significance is increasing in terms of developing good governance and good administration within contemporary transparent, open and collaborative society. The comparative analysis of selected countries (USA, Ireland, Sweden, Austria, Germany, Slovenia, Croatia) included herein proves that selected procedural institutions, such as time limits and an appeal to an independent body or judicial review, contribute to a significantly higher level of implementation of the RTI in practice as also indicated by several international studies. In conclusion, the author recommends certain good practices, especially significance of RTI implementation in relation to different authorities in the context of administrative procedure guaranteeing constitutional and supranational transparency principles"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Vsaka pravica se (bolj) učinkovito uveljavlja, če njeno vsebinsko pravno ureditev podpirajo učinkovita postopkovna pravila. Članek je posvečen analizi procesno-pravne ureditve pravice do informiranja (RTI), saj se njen pomen povečuje pri razvoju dobrega vladanja in upravljanja znotraj sodobne pregledne, odprte in sodelovalne družbe. V članku vključena primerjalna analiza izbranih držav (ZDA, Irska, Švedska, Avstrija, Nemčija, Slovenija, Hrvaška) dokazuje, da izbrani postopkovni instituti, kot so roki in pritožba neodvisnemu organu ali sodni nadzor, prispevajo k znatno višji stopnji izvajanja RTI v praksi, kar navaja tudi več mednarodnih študij. V zaključku avtorica priporoča določene dobre prakse, zlasti pomen izvrševanja RTI s strani različnih organov oblasti v upravnem postopku, ki zagotavlja ustavna in nadnacionalna načela preglednosti"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-YPMRFYL6","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-YPMRFYL6"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-YPMRFYL6/73e37666-25b4-4f01-b282-887cdd97875d/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za upravo"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-YPMRFYL6/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-YPMRFYL6"}}}}