<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-YPMRFYL6/73e37666-25b4-4f01-b282-887cdd97875d/PDF"><dcterms:extent>323 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-YPMRFYL6/421bc489-7999-4c9d-862b-0c55b0a7463a/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>42 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="2013-2017"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">2013</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2017</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-YPMRFYL6"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/urn:NBN:SI:spr-AX7YLI7J" /><dcterms:issued>2014</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Kovač, Polonca</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:12</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:2/3</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 31-45</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:2335-3414</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:4363950</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-YPMRFYL6</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za upravo</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Mednarodna revija za javno upravo</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">administrative procedure</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">appeal</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">comparative analysis</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">pravica do obveščenosti</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">preglednost</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">primerjalna analiza</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">pritožba</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">procedural law</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">procesno pravo</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">right to information</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">transparency</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">upravni postopek</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="2013-2017" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Significance of and comparative trends in procedural regulation of right to information|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Any legal right is (more) efficiently pursued if sufficient procedural regulation supports its substantive setting. This article is dedicated to an analysis of procedural regulation of right to information (RTI) since its significance is increasing in terms of developing good governance and good administration within contemporary transparent, open and collaborative society. The comparative analysis of selected countries (USA, Ireland, Sweden, Austria, Germany, Slovenia, Croatia) included herein proves that selected procedural institutions, such as time limits and an appeal to an independent body or judicial review, contribute to a significantly higher level of implementation of the RTI in practice as also indicated by several international studies. In conclusion, the author recommends certain good practices, especially significance of RTI implementation in relation to different authorities in the context of administrative procedure guaranteeing constitutional and supranational transparency principles</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Vsaka pravica se (bolj) učinkovito uveljavlja, če njeno vsebinsko pravno ureditev podpirajo učinkovita postopkovna pravila. Članek je posvečen analizi procesno-pravne ureditve pravice do informiranja (RTI), saj se njen pomen povečuje pri razvoju dobrega vladanja in upravljanja znotraj sodobne pregledne, odprte in sodelovalne družbe. V članku vključena primerjalna analiza izbranih držav (ZDA, Irska, Švedska, Avstrija, Nemčija, Slovenija, Hrvaška) dokazuje, da izbrani postopkovni instituti, kot so roki in pritožba neodvisnemu organu ali sodni nadzor, prispevajo k znatno višji stopnji izvajanja RTI v praksi, kar navaja tudi več mednarodnih študij. V zaključku avtorica priporoča določene dobre prakse, zlasti pomen izvrševanja RTI s strani različnih organov oblasti v upravnem postopku, ki zagotavlja ustavna in nadnacionalna načela preglednosti</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-YPMRFYL6"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-YPMRFYL6" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-YPMRFYL6/73e37666-25b4-4f01-b282-887cdd97875d/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za upravo</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-YPMRFYL6/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-YPMRFYL6" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>