389 KB0 KB199220252021Martinčević, MarinaPrpić, VedranVranić, Andreaštevilka:letn. 30str. 129-137ISSN:2350-5141COBISSID_HOST:69453059URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-YOP6RI06enDruštvo psihologov SlovenijePsihološka obzorja (Ljubljana)brain trainingCattell's culture fair intelligence test, scale 3 CFT-3cognitive abilitycognitive processescognitive psychologydelovni spominInternational personality item pool-100 IPIP-100kognitivna psihologijakognitivni procesikognitivni treningOperational span task OSPANosebnostne lastnostipersonality traitsspoznavne sposobnostiVprašalnik IPIP-100working memoryPredictors of training efficacy during n-back training| Napovedniki učinkovitosti treninga v različnih fazah treninga n-nazaj|Numerous studies have investigated the efficacy of various cognitive trainings, with working memory being the most often trained cognitive aspect. In this regard, executive aspects of working memory have received the most attention, with updating training being vastly explored. In this study, we aimed to examine the differential contribution of some individual characteristics to the efficacy of updating training using a well-established n-back training paradigm. More specifically, we examined the contribution of fluid reasoning (gf), and personality (neuroticism, conscientiousness) to training efficacy. Participants (N = 47) took part in a 15-session, dual n-back training, spread over 4 weeks. They were pretested for fluid reasoning (CFT-3), personality (IPIP-100), and performed the initial testing on the OSPAN task. OSPAN was measured in three additional measurement points (after 5th, 10th, 15th session). The data was analyzed within the multilevel modeling approach. Initial hypotheses were partly confirmed, in that: 1) training was efficient in terms of OSPAN score, which grew linearly over time and the trajectory was similar between participants, 2) although the growth was similar for all participants, differences were found in intercepts, and 3) these differences could be partly explained by differences in fluid reasoning, but not with personality traits of conscientiousness and neuroticismŠtevilne raziskave so preučevale učinkovitost različnih kognitivnih treningov, pri čemer je bil delovni spomin najpogosteje trenirana kognitivna funkcija. Največ pozornosti so bili deležni izvršilni vidiki delovnega spomina in pri tem je bilo še posebej temeljito raziskano posodabljanje informacij. V pričujoči raziskavi smo z uporabo dobro uveljavljene paradigme, tj. paradigme n-nazaj, želeli preučiti, kakšen je prispevek fluidne inteligentnosti oz. sklepanja (gf) in osebnosti (nevroticizma in vestnosti) k učinkovitosti treninga posodabljanja informacij. Udeleženci (N = 47) so v 15 seansah skozi 4 tedne izvajali trening z nalogo dvojnega n-nazaj. Pred treningom smo s testom CFT-3 izmerili njihovo sposobnost fluidnega sklepanja, s testom IPIP-100 njihovo osebnost, reševali pa so tudi nalogo obsega operativnega spomina (t. i. nalogo OSPAN). OSPAN smo izmerili še v treh dodatnih časovnih točkah (po 5., 10. in 15. seansi treninga). Podatke smo analizirali s postopki večnivojskega modeliranja. Prvotna hipoteza je bila delno potrjena: (1) trening je bil učinkovit, saj je dosežek na nalogi OSPAN s časom linearno naraščal, naraščanje pa je bilo podobno pri različnih udeležencih; (2) čeprav je bila funkcija naraščanja dosežka pri različnih udeležencih podobna, smo našli medosebne razlike v presečiščih; (3) te razlike smo lahko delno pojasnili z medosebnimi razlikami v sposobnosti fluidnega sklepanja, ne pa tudi z razlikami v osebnostnih potezah vestnosti in nevroticizmaTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaDruštvo psihologov Slovenije