<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-Y3MQCWBN/8e313230-b028-48bc-8d44-1b4aed26395f/PDF"><dcterms:extent>754 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-Y3MQCWBN/9f2be703-e46c-42c9-a26e-d053a0e59d8d/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>128 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1965-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1965</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-Y3MQCWBN"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ETPSIC7M" /><dcterms:issued>2011</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Kirn, Andrej</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:48</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:jubilejna</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 1095-1138, 1383</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0040-3598</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:30731613</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-Y3MQCWBN</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo v Ljubljani</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Teorija in praksa</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Družbena kriza</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">družbene spremembe</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Ecological crisis</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Ekološka kriza</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Filozofija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Heidegger, Martin, 1889-1976</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Humanism</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Humanizem</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Philosophy</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Social crisis</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">zgodovinskost</dc:subject><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q7150" /><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1965-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Heidegger in naraščajoča sodobna družbeno-ekološka kriza|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Rather than aiming to give the most proper interpretation of Heidegger, the author's objective is to discover the ecological dimensions of his thinking. This dimension lies particularly in the broad frame of his understanding of humanism and of technology. Heidegger's understanding of metaphysics, technology, and humanism can be linked with the eco-social sustainability paradigm, the idea of the limits to growth and the abandonment of the paradigm of permanent economic growth. Heidegger does not link the understanding of being with the social being. Similarly, he does not link the origin and the development of modern natural sciences and technology with the capitalist society, but with the development of the productionistic metaphysics. A 'relaxed' attitude towards technology will not alter its ecological consequences. In the existing intellectual and practical circumstances, a thorough analysis of the relation between Heidegger and Marx would be more productive than the analysis of the relation between Heidegger and Nazism</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Osnovni cilj avtorja ni, da čimbolj korektno interpretira Heideggerja, ampak da odkrije ekološke razsežnosti njegovega mišljenja. Ta razsežnost je zlasti v širokem okviru njegovega razumevanja humanizma in tehnike. Heideggerjevo razumevanje metafizike, tehnike in humanizma je mogoče povezati z ekosocialno trajnostno paradigmo, z idejo meje rasti in opustitvijo paradigme trajne ekonomske rasti. Heidegger ne povezuje mišljenja biti z družbeno bitjo, prav tako ne nastanka in razvoja moderne naravoslovne znanosti in tehnike s kapitalistično družbo, pač pa z razvojem produkcionistične metafizike. 'Sproščen' odnos do tehnike ne bo spremenil njenih ekoloških posledic. Pri obstoječih miselnih in praktičnih razmerah bi bila bolj produktivna temeljita analiza razmerja med Heideggerjem in Marxom kot pa med Heideggerjem in nacizmom</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-Y3MQCWBN"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-Y3MQCWBN" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-Y3MQCWBN/8e313230-b028-48bc-8d44-1b4aed26395f/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-Y3MQCWBN/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-Y3MQCWBN" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>