537 KB59 KB199120252025Novak, AnaSlovenc Grasselli, MatejaŠumrada, Tanjaštevilka:letn. 35str. 157-175ISSN:0354-0316COBISSID_HOST:267441411URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-XQ6GKYJWslSlovenski etnografski muzejEtnolog. Nova vrsta (Ljubljana)agricultural landscapeagriculturebiodiversity conservationcultural heritageidentitetaidentitykmetijska krajinakmetijstvoKraskulturna dediščinaLjubljansko barjenaravna dediščinanatural heritageohranjanje biotske pestrostiprotected areaszavarovana območjaOhranjanje narave v kmetijski praksi – ovira, nuja ali priložnost?|In the article, the authors examine how farmers from Kras (the Karst) and Ljubljansko barje (Ljubljana Marshes) perceive the notion of the “good farmer” and “good landscape” with the purpose of better understanding their relationship towards nature conservation in agriculture. The study found that most respondents highly value the natural and cultural heritage of the area, which is mainly preserved through extensive farming, but for most farmers intensive farming is the ideal approach. They generally identify themselves as custodians of nature, but mainly in the context of the preservation of nature suitable for long-term, economically viable agricultural production, and rarely in relation to the protection of wild plant and animal speciesPrispevek analizira predstave kmetov s Krasa in Ljubljanskega barja o »dobrem kmetu« in »dobri krajini« z namenom boljšega razumevanja njihovega odnosa do varstva narave v kmetijstvu. Sogovorniki so visoko vrednotili naravno in kulturno dediščino prostora, ki se ohranja predvsem z ekstenzivnimi praksami, a je za večino ideal predstavljalo intenzivno kmetijstvo. Sebe so prepoznavali kot skrbnike narave, vendar bolj v kontekstu ohranjanja narave, primerne za dolgoročno in ekonomsko uspešno kmetijsko pridelavo, redkeje pa za varstvo prostoživečih rastlinskih in živalskih vrstTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaSlovenski etnografski muzej