625 KB54 KB199220252025Borek, Filipštevilka:134/135letnik:34str. 215-237DOI:10.32022/PHI34.2025.134-135.9ISSN:1318-3362COBISSID_HOST:264495619URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-XOB4KNKWenInštitut Nove revije - Zavod za humanistikoPhainomena (Ljubljana)Blausteinfenomenologijafenomenski svethiletikaHusserlhyleticsphenomenal worldphenomenologypsihologijapsychologyStumpfBlaustein’s phenomenological psychology| between Husserl and Stumpf|The article explores the idea of psychology and phenomenology in Blaustein’s writings as well as its relation to two conceptions of phenomenology: Husserl’s and Stumpf ’s, respectively. The article is divided into five sections. In section 1, a historical background of the reception of Husserl’s and Stumpf ’s ideas in Blaustein is discussed. Section 2 concerns the conception of phenomenology in Husserl and in Stumpf regarding its subject matter. Section 3 discusses the ambivalent status of phenomenology in Blaustein’s theoretical project. Section 4 confronts Blaustein’s understanding of phenomenology with that of Husserl and of Stumpf. Section 5 summarizes the discussion of the similarities and differences between Blaustein, on the one hand, and Husserl and Stumpf, on the other hand. I argue that with regard to the question of the subject matter of phenomenology, Blaustein is closer to Husserl’s phenomenology rather than Stumpf ’sTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaInštitut Nove revije - Zavod za humanistiko