95 KB22788 KB75 KB199820252006Bánffy, Eszterštevilka:33letnik:33str. 125-142ISSN:1408-967XCOBISSID:33017698URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-X1JA10N8enOddelek za arheologijo Filozofske fakultete Univerze v LjubljaniDocumenta Praehistoricaarchaeologyarheologijadružbeni razvojHungaryKarpatiKárpátikulturna zgodovinaMadžarskamezolitikneolitiktranzicijaEastern, central and western Hungary - variations of neolithisation models|Until recent times, the Carpathian Basin was regarded as a uniform zone of neolithization. In the last few years it has become clear that at least three different types of transitions can be distinguished in the Eastern Plain (Alföld) region: one in the Jászság area with authentic Mesolithic sites, one in the northern, one in the northeastern fringes of the Körös distribution area, and a further one in the southern part of the Danube-Tisza Interfluve where the impact of the formative Vinča culture must also be reckoned with. All regions differ from each other, concerning the contacts with Mesolithic population and the phases of neolithisation. Regarding Transdanubia, the picture becomes even more complex. The transitionto the Neolithic obviously differed in each region: in the Drava valley where the Starčevo presence was very intensive, in the marshland aroundLake Balaton, in the Rába valley lying close to the Alpine foreland, inthe northern Transdanubian Danube valley and in the Little Hungarian Plain.Rejecting the simplifying model the assumption of a mosaic-like seriesof variations in the neolithisation process is offered. The process of Neolithisation is thus is far from being unified in the various regions. Thisshort study tries to seek different models of neolithisation behind the differencesDo nedavnega so Karpatski bazen smatrali za enotno področje neolitizacije. V zadnjih nekaj letih pa je postalo jasno, da lahko na področju Vzhodne ravnice (Alföld) ločimo vsaj tri različne tipe tranzicije: prvega na področju Jászság, s prvotnimi mezolitskimi najdišči, drugega na severnem intretjega na severovzhodnem obrobju področja Körös, še enega pa na južnem delu Donavskotiškega porečja, kjer je potrebno računati tudi z vplivom kulture Vinča. Regije se v procesu neolitizacije med seboj razlikujejo tudiv odnosih med mezolitskimi in neolitskimi populacijami. V Transdanubijije ta podoba še bolj kompleksna. Tu je neolitizacije v vsaki regiji potekala drugače: v Dravski dolini, kjer je bila močno navzoča kultura Starčevo, na močvirnatem področju okrog Balatonskega jezera, v dolini Rabe, ki leži blizu alpskega predgorja, v severni Transdanubijski donavski dolini in na Mali madžarski ravnini. V članku zavrnemo poenostavljen model neolitizacije in ponudimo domnevo o mozaični seriji regionalnih procesov neolitizacijeTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Filozofska fakulteta