428 KB77 KB201320252016Plavšak, NinaVrenčur, Renatoletnik:42številka:8str. 1407-1430ISSN:0353-6521COBISSID:15351889URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-X08BL3GKslIUS SOFTWAREPodjetje in delojavno dobrostvarne služnostistvarno pravoPrenosljivost in časovna omejenost nepravih stvarnih služnosti in služnosti v javno korist|The relatively tight regulation of quasi in rem easements and easements in the public interest in the practice causes problems with (correct, reasonable) application of certain general rules the Law of Property Code. In the article, authors analyze all aspects of (non)transferability and temporal limitation of these types of easements. Both types of easements have in common that they are non-transferable in the meaning that their beneficiary (the holder of easement) cannot effectively transfer this easement to a new beneficiary. Since both types of easements are established for the benefit of a particular person, they are bound to that person or in the case of a legal person to carrying out the undertaking of that legal person. Therefore, they only cease if the legal person (the beneficiary) ceases without legal succession. An easement in the public interest has an additional feature of being tied to the right to manage the performance of public infrastructure. Therefore, the legal fact that results in a specific person acquiring the right to manage a public infrastructure networks and devices of the corresponding type, at the same time causes the transfer of the easement in the public interest, created for the purposes of management of this infrastructureRazmeroma skopa ureditev nepravih stvarnih služnosti in služnosti v javno korist v praksi povzroča težave pri (pravilni, smiselni) uporabi nekaterih splošnih pravil SPZ. V prispevku avtorja obravnavata vse vidike (ne)prenosljivosti in časovne omejenosti teh vrst služnosti. Obema vrstama služnosti je skupno, da sta samostojno neprenosljivi v tem pomenu, da ju njun imetnik z razpolagalnim pravnim poslom ne more pravno učinkovito prenesti na novega imetnika. Ker sta obe vrsti služnosti ustanovljeni v korist določene osebe, sta vezani na to osebo oziroma dosledneje v primeru pravne osebe na opravljanje podjema te pravne osebe. Zato prenehata samo takrat, kadar preneha ta pravna oseba (služnostni upravičenec) brez pravnega nasledstva. Služnost v javno korist ima dodatno značilnost, da je vezana na pravico upravljati gospodarsko javno infrastrukturo. Zato pravno dejstvo, ki povzroči, da določena oseba pridobi pravico upravljati omrežja in naprave gospodarske javne infrastrukture ustrezne vrste, hkrati povzroči, da nanjo preide služnost v javno korist, ustanovljena za potrebe upravljanja te infrastruktureTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of Slovenia