555 KB55 KB198220252015Leskošek, VesnaZidar, Romanaštevilka:3/4letnik:54str. 205-219ISSN:0352-7956COBISSID:4431717URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-WRUMUDOYslFakulteta za socialno deloSocialno delocommunity social workconsumerismdohodekfoodhranaincomepotrošništvopresežkisamooskrbaself-sufficiencyskupnostno socialno delosurplusPrehranska revščina med skupnostjo in korporacijami|Discourses about food and poverty are being created that directly influence our understanding of causes, consequences and ways of solving the problem of poverty. The article deals with two issues relevant for social work: the discourse about what to do with food surplus, and the discourse about food self-sufficiency in relation to our attitude towards the poor (the unemployed, precarious workers, the retired, the employed poor etc.). It is shown that instruments of public social policies are being replaced by food surplus distribution through the ecology rhetoric. This hides inequalities, encourages invasion of business practices on the field of social security, and divides people on the basis of consuming practices to consumers and non-consumers. The authors show that those who are more well-off can much easier affort to be food self-sufficient. Food production via gardening doesn't have very pronounced economic benefits (compared with buying cheap food in supermarkets), but has an important social, collective aspects. Gardening can also be understood as an ideological space where like-minded people meet. This can have some negative sides as well, as community gardens can become places with no physical borders, but with visible systems of exclusion and controlO hrani in revščini se oblikujejo diskurzi, ki neposredno vplivajo na razumevanje vzrokov, posledic in načinov reševanja problema revščine. Članek obravnava dve, za socialno delo relevantni vprašanji: diskurz o ravnanju s presežki in diskurz o samooskrbi s hrano v odnosu do revnih (brezposelnih, prekarnih delavk in delavcev, upokojenih in zaposlenih revnih ipd.). Prikaže, da razdeljevanje presežkov hrane nadomešča instrumente javnih socialnih politik in prek retorike ekologije. To prikriva neenakosti, spodbuja vnos poslovnih praks in poslovne logike na področje socialnega varstva ter ljudi ločuje na podlagi potrošniških praks na potrošnike in nepotrošnike. Pri samooskrbi je delež samooskrbe s hrano večji v premožnejših gospodinjstvih; to je mogoče povezati s tem, da skrb za vrtiček zahteva stabilno življenjsko situacijo, kot je redna in varna zaposlitev, da je bolj kot pridelava hrane pomemben socialni vidik kolektivnega vrtnarjenja in da je to treba razumeti tudi kot ideološki prostor, v katerem se združujejo ljudje s sorodnimi interesi in pogledi. To prinaša tudi nevarnost, saj lahko vrtički postanejo skupnosti brez fizičnih mej, vendar z zelo opaznim sistemom izključevanja in nadziranjaTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za socialno delo