25 KB2047 KB23 KB194820251997Verč, Ivanštevilka:1/2letnik:45str. 323-330ISSN:0350-6894COBISSID:4286818URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-WPS4AEJYslSlavistično društvo SlovenijeSlavistična revijaangleška dramatikaDostoevskij, Fedor Mihajlovič, 1821-1881literarne študijeliterarni vpliviruska književnostRussian literatureShakespeare, William, 1564-1616Shakespeare, William: HamletTolstoj, Lev Nikolaevič, 1820-1910Turgenev, Ivan SergeevičSolze za Hekubo| (Dostojevski, Turgenjev, Tolstoj)|In Russian literature the reception of Hamlet as a literary character and of Shakespeare as stage director depends on the special culturological status of intertextuality. The Russian writer needs a "foreign" model as a confirmation of "his own" world: in Hamlet's words Dostoevsky discovers the falseness of life, based only on the image of reality expressed in words ("the tears for Hecuba"); Turgenev needs a Shakespearean character to complement Russian "Don Quixotes"; Tolstoy's entirely negative attitude towards Shakespeare can be understood as a demand for the "spiritualization" of society originating in the peasant and religious consciousness ot the Russian peopleV ruski književnosti je recepcija Hamleta kot junaka in Shakespeara kot dramaturga povezana s posebnim kulturološkim statusom intertekstualnosti. "Tuji" vzorec je ruskemu pisatelju namreč potreben kot potrjevanje "svojega" sveta: v Hamletovih besedah Dostojevski odkriva lažnost življenja, ki sloni zgolj na ubesedeni predstavi stvarnosti ("solze za Hekubo"), Turgenjevu je Shakespearov junak potreben kot dopolnilo ruskim "Don Kihotom", popolnoma odklonilni odnos Tolstoja do Shakespeara pa je mogoče razumeti kot zahtevo po "poduhovljenju" družbe z izhodiščem v kmečki in verski zavesti ruskega narodaTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of Slovenia