140 KB64 KB200420202014Erjavec, EmilLovec, Markoštevilka:1letnik:48str. 15-28ISSN:1318-2803COBISSID:32695645URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-WLEDMP9XslZavod Republike Slovenije za makroekonomske analize in razvojIB revija (Ljubljana)Agricultural policyagricultureBudgetCAPEUEuropean UnionEvropska unijaKmetijska politikakmetijstvoProračunskupna kmetijska politikaskupni proračunzelena reformaZelena reforma skupne kmetijske politike pod proračunskim pritiskom| analiza procesa odločanja in primerjalna analiza dejavnikov spremembe politike v letu 2013|In 2013, the EU adopted the "greening" reform of the Common Agricultural Policy, which introduced regionalized direct payments with partial convergence and green payment in an amount of 30% of direct support. In addressing the question as to which factors have shaped reform and how they have done so, the article proposes that seven historical mechanisms are observed, of which three are contextual (external trade, budget costs and paradigm change), and four are institutional (policy network, path dependency, decision-making processes and the quality of the agency). Based on process tracing and a comparative analysis of the causal mechanisms in place, the article deduces that, among the contextual mechanisms, the key role was played by budgetary costs and, among the institutional mechanisms, the key role was played by decision making on the budget which required the consent of all the member states, thereby strengthening the position of the past beneficiaries of the policyLeta 2013 je Evropska unija sprejela "zeleno reformo" skupne kmetijske politike, ki uvaja regionalizacijo z delnim poenotenjem neposrednih plačil in zeleno podporo v obsegu 30 % neposrednih plačil. Članek skuša odgovoriti na vprašanje, kateri dejavniki in kako so oblikovali reformo. Pri tem opazuje sedem zgodovinskih mehanizmov, in sicer tri kontekstualne (zunanja trgovina, proračunski stroški, sprememba paradigme) ter štiri institucionalne (omrežje politike, utirjenost politike, postopki odločanja, individualna vloga odločevalcev). Na podlagi analize procesa odločanja in primerjalne analize vzročnih mehanizmov članek zaključuje, da so ključno vlogo med kontekstualnimi dejavniki imeli proračunski stroški članic, med institucionalnimi pa odločanje s soglasjem o skupnem proračunu, ki daje prednost dosedanjim prejemnikom sredstevTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUrad RS za makroekonomske analize in razvoj