168 KB54 KB201320252022Prostor, Jernejaštevilka:3/4letnik:48str. 409-427ISSN:0353-6521COBISSID_HOST:114996227URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-W6YX4Y1NslLexperaPodjetje in deloamendment ZGD-1Iamendment ZGD-1Kdružba z omejeno odgovornostjoentry of a member in the registerinvitation to the general meetinglimited liability companynovela ZGD-1Inovela ZGD-1Kprenos poslovnega deležatransfer of business sharevabilo na skupščinovpis družbenika v registerPravni učinek vpisa družbenika v register|With the amendment ZGD-1I, the legislator has tried to ensure that the register entries of limited liability companies' members are up to date. Therefore, it changed the assumption as to who is considered to be the holder of the business share in relation to the company. According to the amendment, this is only the person who is entered in the court register. In this article, the author explains some of the views that have been expressed in literature and case law regarding this change. She concludes that the entry of a member in the register is still declaratory and does not affect the circumstance of who is the legitimate holder of a business share and corporate rights. This also means that the company must invite members to the general meeting, which does not necessarily mean those who are registered as members in the court register. Namely, the assumption can be contested. Furthermore, the author also addresses the deficiencies in the regulation that result from the mentioned change of the assumptionZ novelo ZGD-1I je skušal zakonodajalec zagotoviti ažurnost registrskih vpisov družbenikov družb z omejeno odgovornostjo. S tem ciljem je spremenil domnevo, kdo se v razmerju do družbe šteje za imetnika poslovnega deleža. Po noveli je to le tisti, ki je vpisan v sodni register. Avtorica se v prispevku opredeli do nekaj stališč, sprejetih v zvezi s to spremembo v literaturi in sodni praksi. Ugotovi, da ima vpis družbenika v register še vedno deklaratorni učinek in da ne vpliva niti na imetništvo poslovnega deleža niti na okoliščino, kdo je upravičeni nosilec korporacijskih pravic. To tudi pomeni, da mora družba na skupščino vabiti družbenike, kar ne pomeni nujno tistih, ki so kot družbeniki vpisani v sodni register. Domneva je namreč izpodbojna. V nadaljevanju avtorica obravnava tudi pomanjkljivosti v pravni ureditvi, ki so posledica omenjene spremembe domneveTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of Slovenia