{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-VTN2CFV0/e493a06b-87fa-4640-81a5-ae722e73a062/PDF","dcterms:extent":"1787 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-VTN2CFV0/2e0aef00-d3f2-4077-b745-dd801b0e7642/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"72 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2013-2024","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2013"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2024"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-VTN2CFV0","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-CFT6PFGK"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Pravnik"}],"dcterms:issued":"2013","dc:creator":["Ocepek, France","Pahor, Marko"],"dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:5/6"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:68"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 345-372, 447-448"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0032-6976","COBISSID:13238609","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-VTN2CFV0"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Zveza društev pravnikov Slovenije"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"človekove pravice"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"human rights"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"pravdni postopek"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Slovenia"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Slovenija"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"sodišča"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"sodni postopek"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"trajanje"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2013-2024"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Trajanje pravdnega postopka, končanega pred pravdnim oddelkom Okrožnega sodišča v Ljubljani, v luči Lukende|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"One of the most burning problems of the modern Slovenian society is the judiciary system's efficiency, within which the process time of resolving court disputes is evidently exposed. This got its formal and impartial judgment with the European Court of Human Rights' ruling in the case Lukenda vs. Slovenia on 6 October 2005, according to which Slovenia was sentenced to damages for excessive length of civil litigation trial. Authors were looking for the elements impacting the duration of civil litigation trial by analysing cases that proceeded In Ljubljana District court civil Litigation department (the largest department of its kind in Slovenia). Research frame is limited by microelements that are available in particular lawsuit court file and are main basis for establishing state liability for court backlogging.This statistical research was the first to cover classical lawsuit proceedings in Slovenia; previously Bošnjak and others (2005) have been researching criminal case proceedings"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Ena najbolj perečih problematik sodobne slovenske družbe je učinkovitost delovanja sodnega sistema, pri čemer je v ospredju čas reševanja sodnih sporov. Predolgo trajanje sodnega postopka je formalno in nepristransko obsodilo Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice v zadevi Lukenda proti Sloveniji z dne 6. oktobra 2005, v kateri je bilo državi Sloveniji zaradi sodnega postopka v pravdnem postopku iz civilnega pravnega razmerja, vodenega v nerazumnem roku, naloženo plačilo odškodnine. V raziskavi smo iskali elemente vpliva na trajanje civilnega pravdnega postopka na primeru pravd, ki so na prvi stopnji sojenja potekale pred pravdnim oddelkom Okrožnega sodišča v Ljubljani (največji tovrstni oddelek v državi). Pri trajanju je okvir raziskave vplivov omejen na mikroelemente, ki jih ponuja posamezni pravdni spis in ki so poglavitna podlaga za ugotavljanje odškodninske odgovornosti države za sodni zaostanek. Statistična analiza je prva tovrstna za klasične pravdne postopke v Sloveniji, pred tem pa so Bošnjak in drugi (2005) raziskovali kazenske postopke"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-VTN2CFV0","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-VTN2CFV0"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-VTN2CFV0/e493a06b-87fa-4640-81a5-ae722e73a062/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-VTN2CFV0/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-VTN2CFV0"}}}}