<Record><identifier xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">URN:NBN:SI:doc-VG0YQM6Z</identifier><date>2012</date><creator>Sardo, Alessio</creator><relation>documents/doc/V/URN_NBN_SI_doc-VG0YQM6Z_001.pdf</relation><relation>documents/doc/V/URN_NBN_SI_doc-VG0YQM6Z_001.txt</relation><format format_type="issue">53/54</format><format format_type="type">article</format><format format_type="extent">str. 60-95, 402-403</format><identifier identifier_type="ISSN">1408-9653</identifier><identifier identifier_type="COBISSID">74791681</identifier><identifier identifier_type="URN">URN:NBN:SI:doc-VG0YQM6Z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher publisher_location="Ljubljana">Fakulteta za slovenske in mednarodne študije</publisher><source>Dignitas (Ljubljana)</source><rights>BY-ND</rights><subject language_type_id="slv">Primerjalno pravo</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">sodno uravnoteženje</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">Teorije</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">ustavnost</subject><title>Three theories of judicial balancing</title><title>a comparison</title></Record>