<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-VAPGOWMF/934f13dc18b-8e44--a95445c5e-c7cf914f/PDF"><dcterms:extent>344 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-VAPGOWMF/45341d5e-9b4f-4e91-9f84-5c7cf43acc81/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>57 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="2013-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">2013</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-VAPGOWMF"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-2XUGOISV" /><dcterms:issued>2016</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Drnovšek, Klemen</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:42</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:8</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 1486-1503</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0353-6521</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:5268011</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-VAPGOWMF</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">IUS SOFTWARE</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Podjetje in delo</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">pogodbe</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">prenehanje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">sodišča</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">sodna praksa</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="2013-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Institut spremenjenih okoliščin v novejši sodni praksi|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The change of circumstances institution enables the rescission of a contract if, after the contract is concluded, circumstances arise that render the performance of obligations by one party more difficult or owing to which the purpose of the contract cannot be achieved. The author introduces an overview of recent case law relating to usage of the change of circumstances institution. Firstly, the author analyses the case law in relation to substantive issues of the changed circumstances institution and defines his position towards the question of which are the changed circumstances that allow the rescission of a contract. He answers whether a party can request the rescission of a contract also when referring to the real estate market breakdown and in case of economic or financial crisis. In the second part, the author uses the newest case law examples to analyse the appropriate manners of exercising the recession of a contract and the most common mistakes by parties, which have consequences in refuting of claims without consideration of their substantive justification. With regard to the fact that the parties may waive any reference to specific changed circumstances in advance, the author concludes his article with an overview of limitations and discusses the permission of this type of contract termination</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Institut spremenjenih okoliščin omogoča razvezo pogodbe, če po njeni sklenitvi nastanejo okoliščine, ki otežujejo izpolnitev obveznosti ene stranke ali onemogočajo dosego pogodbenega namena. Avtor v prispevku predstavi pregled novejše sodne prakse glede uporabe instituta spremenjenih okoliščin. Najprej analizira sodno prakso, ki se nanaša na vsebinsko presojo predpostavk instituta, in se opredeli do vprašanja, katere so tiste spremenjene okoliščine, ki omogočajo razvezo pogodbe. Med drugim odgovori na vprašanje, ali se razveza pogodbe lahko zahteva tudi zaradi zloma nepremičninskega trga ter v primeru finančne in gospodarske krize. V drugem delu prek najnovejše sodne prakse analizira ustrezne načine uveljavljanja razveze pogodbe in najpogostejše napake strank, katerih posledica je zavrnitev zahtevkov brez presojanja njihove vsebinske utemeljenosti. Glede na to, da se sklicevanju na spremenjene okoliščine stranke lahko vnaprej odpovejo, avtor prispevek zaključi s pregledom omejitev in dopustnosti tovrstne odpovedi</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-VAPGOWMF"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-VAPGOWMF" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-VAPGOWMF/934f13dc18b-8e44--a95445c5e-c7cf914f/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-VAPGOWMF/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-VAPGOWMF" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>