{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-UXTVL18S/0eed0cc8-bb7b-426f-94f1-bcf39c489a72/PDF","dcterms:extent":"2127 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-UXTVL18S/fcd86754-162c-4bff-a63f-078129a954e2/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"95 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2013-2024","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2013"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2024"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-UXTVL18S","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-CFT6PFGK"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Pravnik"}],"dcterms:issued":"2013","dc:creator":"Drenik, Simona","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:11/12"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:68"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 867-901, 939-940"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0032-6976","COBISSID:13526865","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-UXTVL18S"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Zveza društev pravnikov Slovenije"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"mednarodna sodišča"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"mednarodno pravo"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"pravosodje"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"pristojnosti"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2013-2024"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Mednarodno sodstvo: bric-a-brac ali sistem?|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"The purpose of this article is trying to answer a question whether international judiciary is merely bric-a-brac a series of unrelated institutions, or whether it forms a system. The author is taking a broad and practical approach to international judiciary. According to the author the criteria for the definition of international judiciary are the following: (a) the creation by an international instrument, (b) deciding on the basis of international law, (c) legally binding nature of the decision, and (d) the decision-making power in cases where at least one party is state or international organization. This approach does not exclude ad hoc courts and arbitrations. It is supported also by case-law analyses of the coherency of international law, which concern permanent international courts, ad hoc tribunals, international arbitrations and regional courts. In this regard proliferation and decentralization are identified as two general characteristics of international judiciary. Particularly exposed is the issue of guaranteeing coherence of international law by the decentralized international judiciary, as this is also one of the aims of every national judicial system. The author concludes that international judiciary cannot be characterized as a (single) system or as a bric-a-brac. It is accurate, if the current stage of international justice is defined as a system in progress (in statu nescendi). While no formal hierarchy among international courts exists, there is a legal awareness of the need for cooperation and of the potential problems, but such awareness has not been reflected in concrete actions yet"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Namen prispevka je poskus odgovoriti na vprašanje, ali je mednarodno sodstvo zgolj bric-a-brac skupek nepovezanih institucij ali pa tvori sistem. Avtorica zavzame širok in praktičen pristop do mednarodnega sodstva. Po njenem mnenju so merila za opredelitev mednarodnega sodstva ta: a) ustanovitev na podlagi mednarodnega instrumenta, b) odločanje na podlagi mednarodnega prava, c) pravno obvezujoča narava odločitve in d) pristojnost odločanja v primerih, da je vsaj ena stranka država ali mednarodna organizacija. Ta pristop iz pojma mednarodnega sodstva ne izključuje ad hoc sodišč in arbitraž. Podprt je z analizami koherentnosti mednarodnega prava prek sodne prakse, ki vključuje stalna mednarodna sodišča, ad hoc sodišča, mednarodno arbitražo in regionalna sodišča. Tako sta kot temeljni značilnosti mednarodnega sodstva poudarjeni njegova proliferacija in decentralizacija. V ospredju je zlasti zagotavljanje notranje usklajenosti mednarodnega prava s strani decentraliziranega mednarodnega sodstva, kar je tudi eden od ciljev vsakega nacionalnega sodnega sistema. Avtorica sklene, da mednarodnega sodstva ni mogoče označiti niti za (en) sistem niti za bric-a-brac. Korektno je, če je mednarodno sodstvo, kakršno je zdaj, opredeljeno kot sistem v nastajanju (in statu nescendi). In čeprav ni formalne hierarhije med mednarodnimi sodišči, obstaja pravno zavedanje o potrebnem sodelovanju in potencialnih težavah, vendar pa se to še ne kaže v konkretnih ukrepih"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-UXTVL18S","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-UXTVL18S"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-UXTVL18S/0eed0cc8-bb7b-426f-94f1-bcf39c489a72/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-UXTVL18S/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-UXTVL18S"}}}}