<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-UVYGQEIV/a7ee80b4-7f26-4f0f-a6da-a7f18347dfdd/PDF"><dcterms:extent>367 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-UVYGQEIV/21e4976e-434a-4695-a59d-0850d0207621/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>27 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1992-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1992</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-UVYGQEIV"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-FNIFVE9S" /><dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Ahčan, Uroš</dc:creator><dc:creator>Cencelj-Arnež, Romi</dc:creator><dc:creator>Perhavec, Andraž</dc:creator><dc:contributor>Perhavec, Andraž</dc:contributor><dc:creator>Perić, Barbara</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pišlar, Nina</dc:creator><dc:creator>Žgajnar, Janez</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:1</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:57</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 80-85</dc:format><dc:identifier>DOI:10.2478/raon-2022-0026</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN:1318-2099</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:146435075</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-UVYGQEIV</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Croatian Medical Association - Croatian Society of Radiology</dc:publisher><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Slovenian Medical Society - Section of Radiology</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Radiology and oncology (Ljubljana)</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">breast cancer</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">implant-based reconstruction</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">infectious complications</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">infekcijski zapleti</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">rak na dojki</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">rekonstrukcija z vsadki</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1992-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Does concurrent gynaecological surgery affect infectious complications rate after mastectomy with implant-based reconstruction?|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Background. Women who undergo breast cancer surgery often have an indication for gynaecological procedure. The aim of our study was to compare infectious complications rate after mastectomy with implant-based reconstruc-tion in patients with and without concurrent gynaecological procedure.Patients and methods. We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of 159 consecutively operated patients after mastectomy with implant-based reconstruction. The patients were divided in 2 groups: 102 patients without (Group 1) and 57 with (Group 2) concurrent gynaecological procedure. Infectious complications rates between the groups were compared using ?2-test. Logistic regression was performed to test for association of different variables with infec-tious complications.Results. There were240 breast reconstructions performed. Median follow-up time was 297 days (10–1061 days). Mean patient age was 47.2 years (95% CI 32.8–65.9); 48.2 years (95% CI 46.1–50.3) in Group 1 and 45.8 years (95% CI 43.2–48.3) in Group 2; p = 0.002). Infectious complications rate was 17.6% (17.6% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.987), implant loss occurred in 5.7% (4.9% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.58). Obesity (body mass indexBMI &gt; 30 kg/m2), age, previous breast conserv-ing treatment (BCT) with radiotherapy (RT) were identified as risk factors for infectious complications in univariate analysis. Obesity (adjusted odds ratio aOR 3.319, 95% CI 1.085–10.157, p = 0.036) and BCT with RT (aOR 7.481, 95% CI 2.230–25.101, p = 0.001) were independently associated with infectious complications in multivariate model.Conclusions. Concurrent gynaecological procedure for patients undergoing mastectomy with implant-based re-construction did not carry an increased risk for infectious complications</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-UVYGQEIV"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-UVYGQEIV" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-UVYGQEIV/a7ee80b4-7f26-4f0f-a6da-a7f18347dfdd/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Društvo radiologije in onkologije</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-UVYGQEIV/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-UVYGQEIV" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>