1187 KB48 KB196520252020Kumer, Peterštevilka:1letnik:57str. 389-406, 419-420ISSN:0040-3598COBISSID_HOST:36673373URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-UQSAT3K7enVisoka šola za politične vedeTeorija in praksakreativno soustvarjanje prostorakulturne soseskekulturni grozdiobčutenje prostorautemeljevalna teorijaSelf-governance and social inclusion in a post-socialist city| contradictions between city-designated and naturally-occurring arts districts|The tendency of artists and creative professionals, ranging from non-profit and for-profit firms, individual artists, and cultural participants, to cluster in a specific area is observed and discussed in a large body of literature. However, the ways these districts are internally organised has received much less attention. In Ljubljana, one can find five different arts districts that emerged via grass-roots and top-down planning approaches. The article explores their community through the concepts of self-governance, social inclusion, and the right to the city. Our examination of the collective activities in these districts shows that the naturally-occurring districts reflect a spatial political agenda. Those active in such areas are resistant to heteronomy, formal regulation and hierarchy while being engaged in activism, social justice advocacy and artistic self-expression. In contrast, a city designation allows less freedom in management and organisation of the space and does not conflict with authorities over control of the land. While both district types reveal a strong desire to constantly change and produce novelty, the naturally-occurring districts are evolving at a faster pace. The article highlights the value of self-organisation and informal networks in the construction and development of arts districtsTežnjo umetnikov in drugih ustvarjalcev, ki so zastopani v obliki neprofitnih in v dobiček usmerjenih organizacij, samostojnih umetnikov ter kulturnih delavcev, da se združujejo na določenem območju, so že v veliki meri obravnavali v literaturi. Oblike notranje organiziranosti teh sosesk niso bile deležne tolikšne pozornosti. V Ljubljani je moč najti pet različnih kulturnih sosesk, ki so nastale kot rezultat dveh različnih načrtovalskih pristopov: neformalne pobude ali pobude mestnih oblasti. Ta članek raziskuje njihove skupnosti skozi koncepte, kot so avtonomno upravljanje, socialna vključenost in pravica do mesta. Ob preučevanju skupnostnih praks v teh soseskah smo ugotovili, da samonikle soseske odražajo prostorsko politično agendo. Akterji sosesk se bojujejo proti heteronomiji, formalnim ureditvam in hierarhiji. So aktivisti in zagovorniki socialne pravičnosti in umetniškega samoizražanja. Na drugi strani načrtovane soseske dovoljujejo manj svobode pri upravljanju in organizaciji prostora in ne ustvarjajo konfliktov z mestnimi oblastmi glede nadzora nad prostorom. Medtem ko oba tipa sosesk stremita k neprestanim spremembam in novostim, se samonikle soseske razvijajo hitreje. Članek izpostavlja pomen samoorganiziranja in neformalnih mrež pri nastajanju in razvoju kulturnih soseskTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede