<Record><identifier xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">URN:NBN:SI:doc-U4E2K3V0</identifier><date>2004</date><creator>Lipovšek, Frančiška</creator><relation>documents/doc/U/URN_NBN_SI_doc-U4E2K3V0_001.pdf</relation><relation>documents/doc/U/URN_NBN_SI_doc-U4E2K3V0_001.txt</relation><format format_type="volume">1</format><format format_type="issue">1/2</format><format format_type="type">article</format><format format_type="extent">str. 15-22</format><identifier identifier_type="ISSN">1581-8918</identifier><identifier identifier_type="COBISSID">25210466</identifier><identifier identifier_type="URN">URN:NBN:SI:doc-U4E2K3V0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Slovensko društvo za angleške študije</publisher><source>ELOPE (Ljubljana)</source><rights>BY-SA</rights><subject language_type_id="slv">angleščina</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">členek (ling.)</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">določni člen</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">generativna slovnica</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">kazalni zaimek</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">kontrastivna lingvistika</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">slovenščina</subject><title>Why English exhibits determiner-possessor complementarity and Slovene doesn't</title></Record>