<Record><identifier xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">URN:NBN:SI:doc-U2WFWF2I</identifier><date>2020</date><creator>Portocarrero, Marta</creator><relation>documents/doc/U/URN_NBN_SI_doc-U2WFWF2I_001.pdf</relation><relation>documents/doc/U/URN_NBN_SI_doc-U2WFWF2I_001.txt</relation><format format_type="issue">1</format><format format_type="volume">18</format><format format_type="type">article</format><format format_type="extent">str. 203-218</format><identifier identifier_type="COBISSID_HOST">12980995</identifier><identifier identifier_type="ISSN">2591-2240</identifier><identifier identifier_type="URN">URN:NBN:SI:doc-U2WFWF2I</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Fakulteta za upravo</publisher><source>Central European Public Administration Review</source><rights>BY-NC-ND</rights><subject language_type_id="eng">administrative arbitration</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">alternative dispute resolution</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">arbitration procedure</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">objective arbitrability</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">Portugal</subject><title>Arbitration in administrative affairs</title><title>The enlargement scope of ratione materiae in Portugal</title></Record>