375 KB34 KB201320172014Brink, BarbaraMarseille, A. T.letnik:12številka:3/4str. 47-61ISSN:2335-3414COBISSID:4364206URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-U1RROH49enFakulteta za upravoMednarodna revija za javno upravoadministrative law proceduresDutch Central Appeals Tribunalnew case managementNizozemskanovi javni managementOsrednji pritožbeni tribunalpostopki upravnega pravareševanje sporovParticipation of citizens in pre-trial hearings| review of an experiment in the Netherlands|In 2011 the Dutch Central Appeals Tribunal, the highest Dutch court of appeal in legal areas pertaining to social security and the civil service, started consulting the parties of a dispute at an early stage in the procedure, in order to include them in the decisions about the procedural steps to be taken in the settlement of the appeal. One of the underlying rationales is that the involvement of the parties will lead to more acceptance of and contentment with the result. Since the acceptance of court decisions is considered as a criterion for the quality of the procedure, this approach should result in a better quality of the case treatment. In this article the initial results of this new case treatment are presented in the light of expectations from the literature on citizen participation in policy processes of public agencies. The data indicate that the New Case Management Procedure at the Central Appeals Tribunal can lead to an improvement of the quality of the case treatment, by inviting citizens to discuss with the judge about the case treatment. However, the procedure itself does not guarantee this increased qualityLeta 2011 je nizozemski Osrednji pritožbeni tribunal, najvišje nizozemsko pritožbeno sodišče za pravna področja, ki se nanašajo na socialno varnost in sistem javnih uslužbencev, v zgodnji fazi postopka začelo svetovati strankam v sporu, z namenom da bi jih vključilo v odločitve o postopkovnih korakih pri reševanju pritožbe v smislu poravnave. To utemeljuje s pričakovanjem, da bo vključitev strank pripeljala do boljšega sprejetja in večjega zadovoljstva z izidom. Ker je sprejetje sodnih odločitev merilo kakovosti postopka, bi posledica tega pristopa morala biti kakovostnejša obravnava primera. V članku so predstavljeni prvi rezultati tega novega načina obravnave v luči pričakovanj iz literature o udeležbi državljanov v procesih obravnave javnih politik. Ti podatki kažejo, da novi postopek upravljanja primerov Osrednjega pritožbenega tribunala, ki državljane povabi k razpravi o obravnavi primera s sodnikom, lahko pripelje do izboljšanja kakovosti obravnave. Kljub temu sam postopek ne zagotavlja večje kakovostiTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za upravo